Skip to main content
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports logoLink to Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
. 2016 Aug 4;8:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.07.021

Murine model of hepatic breast cancer

Rishi Rikhi a,1, Elizabeth M Wilson b,1, Olivier Deas c, Matthew N Svalina a,d, John Bial b, Atiya Mansoor e, Stefano Cairo c,1, Charles Keller a,d,⁎,1
PMCID: PMC5613703  PMID: 28955934

Abstract

Background and aims

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in this population. Breast cancer related deaths have declined due to screening and adjuvant therapies, yet a driving clinical need exists to better understand the cause of the deadliest aspect of breast cancer, metastatic disease. Breast cancer metastasizes to several distant organs, the liver being the third most common site. To date, very few murine models of hepatic breast cancer exist.

Methods

In this study, a novel murine model of liver breast cancer using the MDA-MB-231 cell line is introduced as an experimental (preclinical) model.

Results

Histological typing revealed consistent hepatic breast cancer tumor foci. Common features of the murine model were vascular invasion, lung metastasis and peritoneal seeding.

Conclusions

The novel murine model of hepatic breast cancer established in this study provides a tool to be used to investigate mechanisms of hepatic metastasis and to test potential therapeutic interventions.

Abbreviations: HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; FRG™ KO, [ Fah(-/-) R ag2(-/-)Il2r g (-/-)]); NOD, Non-obese diabetic; Ad:uPA, Adenovirus Urokinase Plasminogen Activator; pfu, plaque forming units; DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium; HCM, Hepatocyte Culture Medium; IACUC, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee; AFP, Alpha Fetal Protein; Hep Par 1, Hepatocyte Paraffin 1; GPC3, Glypican-3

Keywords: Breast cancer, Preclinical model, Liver metastasis

Highlights

  • We present a novel murine model of hepatic breast cancer.

  • Histomorphology is uniform and consistent with the human disease.

  • This model can be used to test preclinical therapeutic regimens.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in this population. It is estimated that there will be 231,840 new cases of breast cancer and 40,290 breast cancer related deaths in women in 2015 [1]. The survival rate for patients diagnosed with breast cancer is a function of a variety of factors, the most important being metastasis. In fact, the survival rate for patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer to distant organs falls from 99% to 25% when compared to primary site-only cases [1]. Although 61% of breast cancers are localized, 10–15% of patients develop metastasis to distant organs [1], [2]. Predicting the risk of metastasis is often difficult due to a lack of biological markers and the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer [2]. Histological typing does not provide tremendous predictive value for metastasis, yet invasive ductal carcinoma is the most common invasive breast carcinoma and has one of the lowest survival rates [2]. At a molecular level, HER2-enriched and triple-negative (estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative and HER2 negative) tumors are associated with a higher rate of liver metastases [3]. The fact that metastasis does not respond well to traditional management techniques of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy is a key motivator to developing better research models [2], [4].

Murine models are a useful tool for researchers and oncologists in characterizing and understanding the spread of breast cancer. A summary of these models is presented in Table 1. Unto now, a model of primarily hepatic metastasis is lacking. In this study, we report the development of a novel murine model of hepatic breast cancer using the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, a triple-negative adenocarcinoma cell line derived from a 51-year-old Caucasian female [5].

Table 1.

Literature review of murine models of hepatic breast cancer. The table states the cell lines for various murine models of breast cancer hepatic metastasis as well as the purpose of each study.

Cell Line Mouse Inoculation site Liver met? Other met? Study purpose Reference
MDA-MB-435 Female nude Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Use of surgical orthotopic implantation [7]
MDA-MB-435 Female athymic NU/NU Right second mammary gland Yes Yes Optical imaging [8]
4T1 Female BALB/c Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of bisphosphonate [9]
4T1 Female BALB/c Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of factor 4 [10]
4T1 Female BALB/c Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Use of dabigatran [11]
4T1 Female BALB/c Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of R428 [12]
4T1 BALB/cfC3H Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Imaging [13]
4T1/luc BALB/c Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of zoledronic acid [14]
MDA-MB-231 Female NCr nu/nu Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2 [15]
MDA-MB-231 Female athymic nude Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of GLV-1h153 in TNBC [16]
MDA-MB-231 BALB/cAnN.CG-Foxn1 nu/CrINar Tail vein Yes No Effect of VP1 [17]
MDA-MB-231 Mammary pat Yes Yes Effect of PEDF [18]
MDA-MB-231 Female nude Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of CH50 [19]
MDA-MB-231/luc Female Rag2-/-II2rg-/- Mammary fat pad Yes Yes Effect of phenytoin on TNBC [20]
4TLM BALB-c Right upper mammary gland Yes Yes Multi metastatic model [21]
4THM BALB-c Second right chest mammary pad Yes Yes Effect of semapimod [22]

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Preconditioning with Ad:uPA

Cesium chloride banded and plaque assay titered Ad: uPA was diluted to 1.25×109 plaque forming units (pfu)/100 µL in sterile 0.9% saline and filtered using an Acrodisc syringe filter with 0.45 µM HT Tuffryn membrane. Each mouse was anesthetized using isoflurane and dosed via retro-orbital vein injection with 1.25×109 pfu per 25 g of body weight.

2.2. Transplant with human MDA-MB-231 cells

Cryopreserved human MDA-MB-231 cells (Xentech, France) were thawed and expanded in Advanced DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. After expansion, the cells were detached from the tissue culture plate by treatment with TryPLE, collected, and centrifuged at 150×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The MDA-MB-231 cells were resuspended in HCM (catalog# CC-3198, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) to a concentration of 1–2×106 cell/mL and diluted 1:1 in 0.4% trypan blue; the cell number and viability were determined using a hemocytometer. MDA-MB-231 cells were centrifuged again at 150×g for 10 min at 4 °C and reconstituted in HCM (Lonza) at 10×106 cells/mL. To counteract rapid vascular clearing and allow adequate time for liver engraftment, the MDA-MB-23 cells were then mixed 1:1 with Matrigel phenol red free (cat#356237, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA); this generated a 100 µL transplant solution. The mixture was kept on ice to prevent the Matrigel phenol red free from solidifying.

All animal studies were done with approval of the IACUC for Yecuris, Inc. FRG™ KO/NOD mice were anesthetized using isoflurane. Hair was removed from the lateral region and mid-line of each animal using Nair® hair removal cream, Then the 100 µL of transplant solution was delivered through the dermal layer into the frontal lobe of the liver 22–24 h after pretreatment with Ad:uPA. The mice were observed each day post-transplant and were provided water and food ad libitum. The transplanted mice were placed on the standard Nitisinone cycling for all xenografted mice.

2.3. Human AFP ELISA

Human alpha-1 fetoprotein (AFP) ELISA kit (cat#ab108838) was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Sera samples were collected at four weeks post-transplantation and stored at −80 °C until assayed. The human AFP levels from each mouse were assayed using 50 µL of sample at a 1:5, 1:20 or 1:100 dilution of sera according to the manufacturer's protocol.

2.4. Immunostaining

Immunohistochemical staining was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Four micron sections were prepared on charged slides. Staining was performed on Ventana XT automated instruments (Ventana, Tucson, AZ) with ultra-view polymer-based DAB detection system. Clone designations, working dilutions, and sources for the commercially available antibodies were as follows: AFP (Clone A0008, dilution 1:3000, Dako, Carpinteria, CA), Hep Par 1 (Clone M7158, dilution, 1:250, Dako), Glypican 3 (Clone 790-4564, predilute, Ventana, Tucson, AZ), Her 2-neu (Clone 790-2991, predilute, Ventana), p53 (Clone 790-2912, predilute, Ventana), Ki-57 (Clone 790-4286, predilute, Ventana) Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Appropriate positive and negative controls were present in every case. Negative controls were performed by replacing the primary antibody with normal mouse serum. Final interpretation of the staining results was performed by a surgical pathologist using light microscopy.

3. Results

To create a murine model of hepatic breast cancer, we preformed direct injection of MDA-MB-231 cells into the frontal lobe of the liver (Fig. 1A) of mice previously shown to have a capacity to be repopulated with primary human hepatocytes. This FRG™ KO [ Fah(-/-) R ag2(-/-)Il2r g (-/-)]) on the NOD mouse strain has been previously described [6]. In this model, however, co-injection of primary human hepatocytes offered no additional benefit to engraftment, but only increased the degree of necrosis (data not shown). Therefore analysis was restricted to FRG™ KO/NOD mice injected with MDA-MB-231 tumor cells only. Histological typing revealed exclusively breast cancer cells (and not murine hepatic tumors). Characteristic human breast cancer liver metastases are shown in Fig. 1B and Fig. 1C. The murine model approximated this histology (Fig 1D-1F). Common features of the model were vascular invasion (Fig. 1G), lung metastasis (Fig. 1H) and peritoneal seeding (not shown). There was no splenic disease seen in the model. The immunostains for intrinsic liver cancer markers AFP, Hep Par 1 and GPC3 were all negative (Fig. 2). The immunostain for Her-2 neu were negative, and immunostain for p53 was positive in 80% of tumor cells and the Ki-67 proliferation index was 60% (Fig. 2). An ELISA was done in order to measure serum AFP, but the level was below the limit of detection.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Murine model of hepatic breast cancer (A) Diagram of murine engraftment. (B, C) Photomicrograph of liver metastasis in a human patient. (D) Murine tumor of almost exclusively an undifferentiated cell component. (E, F) Additional histological features of the murine model. (G) Vascular invasion was a prominent (depicted with red arrows), and (H) lung metastasis was a consistent feature. Peritoneal seeding was common but no intrasplenic disease was seen (data now shown).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Immunostains for intrinsic hepatic and breast cancer markers (A) Intrinsic liver marker AFP. Serum AFP by ELISA was below the limit of detection (data not shown). (B) Liver marker Glypican-3. (C) Liver marker Hep Par 1. (D) Cancer marker HER2/Neu. (E) Cancer marker P53. (F) Cancer marker Ki-67 (nuclear).

4. Discussion

A strong clinical need exists to better understand breast cancer metastasis. The novel murine model of hepatic breast cancer established in this study provides a tool to be used to investigate mechanisms of hepatic metastasis and potential therapeutic interventions. Characteristics of this murine model are consistent with clinical features of breast cancer metastasis, such as vascular invasion and metastasis to the lung (the second most common organ affected by breast cancer metastasis) [2]. Furthermore, tumors in these FRG™ KO/NOD mice cannot be attributed to strain background, as the tumor markers in this model were not consistent with primary hepatic tumors. While a limitation of this model was that it was not generated with a HER2+ cell line, future studies may include this biological feature. However, the tumor samples were positive for well-established breast cancer cell markers p53 and Ki-67. It is also important to note that there was no control for the FAH phenotype in this experiment. Future studies will investigate the necessity and level of benefit of the FAH phenotype in engraftment. In summary, however, the procedure reported here represents a reproducible way to generate a hepatic breast cancer preclinical model to understand tumor-microenvironment interactions and to test preclinical therapeutic regimens.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Macy Easom Cancer Research Foundation. Contributions of authors: EMW performed animal studies. AM & CK performed histology & immunohistochemistry. OD contributed the MDA-MB-231 cell line. RR, EMW, MNS and CK wrote the manuscript. CK, JB and SC designed & supervised all studies.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.07.021.

Appendix A. Transparency document

Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc2.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc3.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc4.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc5.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc6.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc7.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc8.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc9.xlsx (33.2KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Alteri R., Bertaut T., Brooks D., Chambers W., Chang E., DeSantis C. Cancer facts & figures 2015. Am. Cancer Soc. 2015:9–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weigelt B., Peterse J.L., van ‘t Veer L.J. Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5:591–602. doi: 10.1038/nrc1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kennecke H., Yerushalmi R., Woods R., Cheang M.C., Voduc D., Speers C.H., Nielsen T.O., Gelmon K. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:3271–3277. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kozlowski J., Kozlowska A., Kocki J. Breast cancer metastasis – insight into selected molecular mechanisms of the phenomenon. Postep. Hig. MEd Dosw. (Online) 2015;69:447–451. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1148710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cailleau R., Olive M., Cruciger Q.V. Long-term human breast carcinoma cell lines of metastatic origin: preliminary characterization. In Vitro. 1978;14:911–915. doi: 10.1007/BF02616120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Azuma H., Paulk N., Ranade A., Dorrell C., Al-Dhalimy M., Ellis E., Strom S., Kay M.A., Finegold M., Grompe M. Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah-/-/Rag2-/-/Il2rg-/- mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:903–910. doi: 10.1038/nbt1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hoffman R.M. Orthotopic metastatic mouse models for anticancer drug discovery and evaluation: a bridge to the clinic. Investig. New Drugs. 1999;17:343–359. doi: 10.1023/a:1006326203858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li X., Wang J., An Z., Yang M., Baranov E., Jiang P., Sun F., Moossa A.R., Hoffman R.M. Optically imageable metastatic model of human breast cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2002;19:347–350. doi: 10.1023/a:1015510207431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yoneda T., Michigami T., Yi B., Williams P.J., Niewolna M., Hiraga T. Actions of bisphosphonate on bone metastasis in animal models of breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:2979–2988. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<2979::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yori J.L., Seachrist D.D., Johnson E., Lozada K.L., Abdul-Karim F.W., Chodosh L.A., Schiemann W.P., Keri R.A. Kruppel-like factor 4 inhibits tumorigenic progression and metastasis in a mouse model of breast cancer. Neoplasia. 2011;13:601–610. doi: 10.1593/neo.11260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DeFeo K., Hayes C., Chernick M., Ryn J.V., Gilmour S.K. Use of dabigatran etexilate to reduce breast cancer progression. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010;10:1001–1008. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.10.13236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Holland S.J., Pan A., Franci C., Hu Y., Chang B., Li W., Duan M., Torneros A., Yu J., Heckrodt T.J., Zhang J., Ding P., Apatira A., Chua J., Brandt R., Pine P., Goff D., Singh R., Payan D.G., Hitoshi Y. R428, a selective small molecule inhibitor of Axl kinase, blocks tumor spread and prolongs survival in models of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1544–1554. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baklaushev V.P., Grinenko N.F., Yusubalieva G.M., Abakumov M.A., Gubskii I.L., Cherepanov S.A., Kashparov I.A., Burenkov M.S., Rabinovich E.Z., Ivanova N.V., Antonova O.M., Chekhonin V.P. Modeling and integral X-ray, optical, and MRI visualization of multiorgan metastases of orthotopic 4T1 breast carcinoma in BALB/c mice. Bull. Exp. Biol. MEd. 2015;158:581–588. doi: 10.1007/s10517-015-2810-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hiraga T., Williams P.J., Ueda A., Tamura D., Yoneda T. Zoledronic acid inhibits visceral metastases in the 4T1/luc mouse breast cancer model. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:4559–4567. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tester A.M., Waltham M., Oh S.J., Bae S.N., Bills M.M., Walker E.C., Kern F.G., Stetler-Stevenson W.G., Lippman M.E., Thompson E.W. Pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2 transfection increases orthotopic primary growth and experimental metastasis of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells in nude mice. Cancer Res. 2004;64:652–658. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-0384-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gholami S., Chen C.H., Lou E., De Brot M., Fujisawa S., Chen N.G., Szalay A.A., Fong Y. Vaccinia virus GLV-1h153 is effective in treating and preventing metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann. Surg. 2012;256:437–445. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182654572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hung S.W., Chiu C.F., Chen T.A., Chu C.L., Huang C.C., Shyur L.F., Liang C.M., Liang S.M. Recombinant viral protein VP1 suppresses HER-2 expression and migration/metastasis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012;136:89–105. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2238-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hong H., Zhou T., Fang S., Jia M., Xu Z., Dai Z., Li C., Li S., Li L., Zhang T., Qi W., Bardeesi A.S., Yang Z., Cai W., Yang X., Gao G. Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) inhibits breast cancer metastasis by down-regulating fibronectin. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2014;148:61–72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3154-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.He Z.H., Lei Z., Zhen Y., Gong W., Huang B., Yuan Y., Zhang G.M., Wang X.J., Feng Z.H. Adeno-associated virus-mediated expression of recombinant CBD-HepII polypeptide of human fibronectin inhibits metastasis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2014;143:33–45. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2783-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nelson M., Yang M., Dowle A.A., Thomas J.R., Brackenbury W.J. The sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drug phenytoin inhibits breast tumour growth and metastasis. Mol. Cancer. 2015;14:13. doi: 10.1186/s12943-014-0277-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Erin N., Kale S., Tanriover G., Koksoy S., Duymus O., Korcum A.F. Differential characteristics of heart, liver, and brain metastatic subsets of murine breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013;139:677–689. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2584-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Erin N., Duymus O., Ozturk S., Demir N. Activation of vagus nerve by semapimod alters substance P levels and decreases breast cancer metastasis. Regul. Pept. 2012;179:101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc2.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc3.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc4.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc5.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc6.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc7.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc8.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc9.xlsx (33.2KB, xlsx)

Articles from Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES