Abstract
We present the case of a young pregnant woman with cardiopulmonary arrest due to acute coronary syndrome. Emergent coronary angiography (CAG) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) showed extensive coronary artery dissection in the left anterior descending artery, which was treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. After managing the heart failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation, a dead fetus was delivered via caesarean section 4 days after admission to the hospital. Follow-up CAG and IVUS at 18 months showed persistent dissection in the non-stented site; hence, another stent was implanted. Dual antiplatelet therapy was discontinued 6 months later; however, aspirin and beta-blockers were continued lifelong.
Keywords: Interventional cardiology, Ischaemic heart disease, Pregnancy
Background
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is likely to occur in young women without any cardiovascular risk factors, especially during pregnancy and the early postpartum period. When a catastrophic event due to SCAD occurs during pregnancy, the treatment to save the lives of both mother and fetus is complicated.
Case presentation
A 32-year-old pregnant woman at 38 weeks of gestation was brought to the emergency department by ambulance due to sudden onset of chest pain. She had been healthy except for a history of miscarriage when she was 31 years old. No problems had been observed during her prenatal check-up. Electrocardiography (ECG) showed ST segment elevation in leads V2-6 (figure 1), and there were positive findings for heart-type fatty acid binding protein and troponin T. She was diagnosed with anterior ST segment elevated myocardial infarction. Her haemodynamics were stable on arrival (blood pressure: 159/102 mm Hg, regular sinus rhythm: 75 beats/min and oxygen saturation: 100% on room air). Twenty-four minutes after arrival, her consciousness level suddenly dropped due to ventricular fibrillation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started immediately and the emergency team called for cardiologists. It took 19 min to recover her haemodynamic status and heart rhythm after three rounds of electrical defibrillation and tracheal intubation. Since we lacked experience on handling perimortem caesarean delivery (PMCD) in the emergency department, we consulted an obstetrician with the objective of saving the mother’s life.
Figure 1.
The electrocardiography showed ST segment elevation in lead V2-6.
Differential diagnosis
A young woman who did not have any cardiovascular risk factors presented with acute chest pain and cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Since the ECG showed ST segment elevation, we suspected ACS caused by coronary vasospasm or thrombus due to a hypercoagulable state. ACS, acute pulmonary embolism or both were considered the reasons of CPA.
Treatment
After obtaining informed consent from the patient’s husband, we transferred her to the catheterisation laboratory 17 min after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The obstetrician confirmed a critical drop of the fetal heartbeat to 40–50/min through an ultrasound scan. We performed coronary angiography (CAG), which revealed 99% stenosis of the middle left anterior descending artery (LAD) and gradual narrowing to complete occlusion without any hazy images (figure 2). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was subsequently performed with the support of an intra-aortic balloon pump to restore the stable haemodynamics. We tried to advance a SION blue guide wire (Asahi Intecc, Aichi, Japan) through the lesion; however, we failed and the wire was stuck in the lesion. Subsequently, we crossed an Athlete Joker guide wire (Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan) to the distal LAD using a multifunctional probing catheter (Crusade, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan; figure 3A). Intravascular ultrasound (OptiCross, Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) showed an intimal-medial flap and intramural haematoma without any atherosclerotic change (figure 3B), which are characteristic findings of SCAD. An enlarged haematoma compressed the true lumen, causing ongoing ischaemia (figure 3C). We first used a semicompliant balloon (Tazuna 2.5×15 mm, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) for dilation of the true lumen. Subsequently, we used a cutting balloon (Flextome 3.0×10 mm, Boston Scientific) to attempt a re-entry of the pseudo lumen to the true lumen, which enabled us to perform thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 2 with transient flow. As it was difficult to maintain sufficient coronary flow due to the recoil of the true lumen, we implanted a bare metal stent (MULTI-LINK 8 3.0×23 mm, Abbott Vascular, California, USA) in the middle LAD, at the point of entry of the dissected site. However, distal coronary flow was not maintained despite several balloon dilations and additional stent implantation (Integrity 2.5×14 mm, Medtronic, California, USA). Since the spiral dissection reached the end of the LAD, it was not effective to implant more stents or attempt balloon dilation. We completed the PCI procedure in 3 hours and 30 min. Unfortunately, fetal cardiac arrest was confirmed after 2 hours and 45 min of initial ultrasound scan in the catheterisation laboratory.
Figure 2.

Emergent coronary angiography. Cranial views of right (A) and left (B) anterior oblique projections. The left anterior descending artery was narrowing from the middle site and occluded at the distal site (arrows).
Figure 3.

(A) Coronary angiography after balloon dilation and (B) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in the middle left anterior descending artery (LAD) corresponding to the arrow (a), which demonstrated intramural haematoma without any atherosclerotic change. (C) IVUS in the distal LAD corresponding to the arrow (b), which showed a compression of the true lumen with haematoma.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient had severe pulmonary congestion with a low left ventricular ejection fraction (30%) due to myocardial infarction. Peak creatine kinase (CK) level was 6215 IU/L and CK muscle-brain level was 265 IU/L. We hesitated to deliver the fetus immediately because of the mother’s serious general condition. Since her heart failure and consciousness recovered rapidly, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) had progressed due to the retained dead fetus syndrome, we delivered the fetus via caesarean section on the fourth day. DIC resolved after the delivery and her general condition improved rapidly without any neurological deficit. After she was extubated on the fifth day, we informed her of the death of the fetus following the caesarean section. It was hard for her to accept the fate of the fetus while she survived. The medical staff, including obstetricians and midwives, provided puerperal and mental care. In addition, her husband and parents showed compassion and cooperated well. Fortunately, she did not show any significant post-traumatic stress disorder. She stayed in the hospital for 29 days and regained general exercise tolerance. Bisoprolol 2.5 mg, aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg were continued even after discharge.
Follow-up CAG (figure 4A) and optical frequency domain imaging (Fastview, Terumo) at 18 months revealed intimal healing of the stented sites (figure 4B) and distal LAD; however, there was a remnant dissection in the non-stented site between the implanted stents (figure 4C). Therefore, a drug-eluting stent (DES) (Ultimaster 2.5×15 mm, Terumo) was implanted, and clopidogrel was discontinued 6 months later.
Figure 4.

(A) Follow-up coronary angiography at 18 months. The coronary dissection had still remained between the two implanted stents. (B) Optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) corresponding to the arrow (a) showed concentric neointimal proliferation in the stent. (C) OFDI image corresponding to the arrow (b) demonstrated both true and pseudo lumen at non-stented site between the two stents. An OFDI catheter was located in the true lumen.
Discussion
Pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) occurs in 0.7–10 per 100 000 pregnancies.1–3 It is complicated to manage and save the lives of both mother and fetus. To the best of our knowledge, 13 cases of patients surviving AMI due to SCAD during pregnancy have been reported (table 1).4–16 Including the present case, all mothers and eight infants had survived (60%). AMI due to SCAD during pregnancy is likely to occur in women over 30 years old (71%) and after more than 8 months of gestation (71%). The LAD was the most frequently involved artery (79%) and the involvement of multiple vessels was observed in 36% cases. Six cases, including the present case (43%), had survived ventricular fibrillation and maternal cardiopulmonary collapse. Only one case (case 4 in table 1) has been reported where both mother and fetus had survived.
Table 1.
14 cases of acute myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection during pregnancy
| Case no | Age | Gestation period | Culprit vessel | CPA due to Vf | PCI | Special treatment | CABG | Caesarean section | Infant | ||
| (years) | (weeks) | Situation | Timing | ||||||||
| 1 | 43 | 38 | LAD | P | P | POBA | N | Emergent | After PCI | ND | |
| 2 | 37 | 21 | LAD | P | P | BMS | N | Elective | 6 days later | Abortion | |
| 3 | 32 | 7 | LAD, LCX | P | N | N | Elective | 2 weeks later | Abortion | ||
| 4 | 27 | 37 | LAD, LCX | P | N | N | Emergent | After CPR | Survive | ||
| 5 | ND | 36 | RCA | P | P | Stent | ECMO | N | ND | ND | ND |
| 6 | 21 | 6 | LAD | N | P | DES | N | Elective | 8 months later | Survive | |
| 7 | 28 | 36 | LAD, LCX | N | P | POBA | P | Emergent | After CABG | Survive | |
| 8 | 45 | 25 | LAD | N | P | BMS | N | Elective | 13 weeks later | ND | |
| 9 | 31 | 36 | LAD | N | P | POBA | IABP | P | Emergent | After PCI | Survive |
| 10 | 36 | 36 | LAD, LCX | N | N | IABP | P | Emergent | After CAG | Survive | |
| 11 | 33 | 36 | LAD, LCX | N | N | IABP | P | Emergent | After CAG | Survive | |
| 12 | 34 | 34 | LMT | N | N | P | Emergent | After CAG | Survive | ||
| 13 | 34 | 32 | RCA | N | P | BMS | N | Elective | 1 month later | Survive | |
| 14 (present) | 32 | 38 | LAD | P | P | BMS | IABP | N | Elective | 4 days later | Abortion |
BMS, bare metal stent; CAG, coronary angiography; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CPA, cardiopulmonary arrest; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DES, drug-eluting stent; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; LMT, left main trunk; N, negative; ND, not described; P, positive; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; POBA, plain old balloon angioplasty; RCA, right coronary artery; Vf, ventricular fibrillation.
According to the guidelines, PMCD should be considered within 4 min of the onset of maternal cardiac arrest or failure of resuscitative efforts, if there is no ROSC.17 18 The indication of PMCD varies depending on the gestational age. For the mother, PMCD should be considered after 20 weeks of gestation because maternal cardiac output reduction due to IVC compression by the gravid uterus may occur. On the other hand, 22 weeks of gestation is necessary for the fetus to be alive, and gestational age is closely related to fetal outcome.19 The MBRRACE-UK (mother and babies: reducing risk through audits and confidential enquiries in the UK) programme reported that 75% babies died if delivered by PMCD at less than 37 weeks of gestation.20 Therefore, PMCD is not indicated in the first trimester and the early second trimester (16–21 weeks). Fetal outcome is related to maturity of preterm births in the late-second to the early-third trimester (22–36 weeks). After 37 weeks of gestation, PMCD is recommended because positive outcomes for both mother and fetus are expected.
While guidelines suggest that PMCD should be considered within 4 min and delivery within 5 min of the onset of maternal cardiac arrest, there are cases of good fetal outcome with PMCD performed after 15 min as well. The average time elapsed from arrest to PMCD was shorter in fetal survivors than in non-survivors. The mean time of elapse was 14±11 min.21 Nonga et al22 reported that the reason a fetus can survive long periods of maternal hypotension was that the fetus has an intrinsic autoregulation mechanism to survive poor conditions. The fetal and the maternal condition as well as the possibility of caesarean section should be considered whenever fetal distress appears. Ideally, independent teams cooperating with each other for the safety of both maternal and fetal lives should be established for these emergencies. Immediate caesarean section after CPA due to AMI caused by SCAD has been reported in only one case (case 4), which showed stable haemodynamics after CPR. In this case, we performed PCI first because of the instability of maternal haemodynamics due to ongoing myocardial ischaemia. We knew that caesarean section under cardiogenic shock posed a high risk for maternal death.
Although standard therapy for SCAD in a pregnant woman has not been established, there are several case reports of its successful management with medical therapy, coronary artery bypass grafting and PCI. In this case, we considered that immediate revascularisation by PCI was better to manage ongoing ischaemia with unstable haemodynamics. Since cardiac surgeons or their medical staff are not always available during night at our hospital, initiation of bypass surgery would require more than 1 hour. Although maternal mortality in emergent surgery is 9.8 times as high as in elective surgeries,23 mortality from cardiac surgery in pregnant women is 1.5%–5%, which is similar to that in non-pregnant women.24 Several successful cases of cardiac surgery in different gestational periods have been reported.22 25 26 A case of successful survival of both lives in unstable haemodynamics with type A acute aortic dissection was similar to the present case.22 However, cardiac arrest in pregnancy is rare and PMCD has been performed in 0.004% of 24 883 deliveries in Canadian tertiary care centre over 22 years.27 The lack of knowledge and experience on PMCD in hospital systems28 29 may result in hesitation to perform this procedure. Because our staff at the emergency room, including the obstetrician, had never experienced CPA due to cardiovascular emergency in pregnant women, we decided to prioritise the maternal resuscitation. Recently, PMCD was introduced in the Netherlands, and its utilisation has increased during the last 15 years, but it is still not so frequent. PMCD was performed in 12 out of 55 women with cardiac arrests (12 per 2 929 289 deliveries (0.000004%)).30 Since such complicated situations are rarely observed, an international collaboration may play an important role in sharing advanced knowledge to prevent any unfortunate incidents.
Another serious concern is the high rate of recurrence of SCAD (13%–22%).31–33 The probability of its recurrence depends on the interval between prior AMI and pregnancy. Nakashima et al31 reported that the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is seven times higher in SCAD than in atherosclerosis. It was also reported that the rate of MACE was highest in the first 30 days (17%) and increased slowly during the following 5 years (37%). A pregnancy should not be planned within 1 year after vessel revascularisation or AMI due to the requirement of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and frequent MACE.11 In this case, aspirin, clopidogrel and bisoprolol were continued after the first PCI. We discontinued clopidogrel 6 months after the implantation of a DES in the remaining dissection site at the 18-month follow-up visit. Since data on the safety of thienopyridines during pregnancy are limited, they should only be used for the shortest possible duration. In this case, angioplasty using a scoring balloon catheter or a bare metal stent implantation is advantageous over DES implantation, which requires a long DAPT period in pregnant women. A successful delivery of healthy infants via elective caesarean surgery was reported in cases where clopidogrel was withdrawn and there was a limited duration of DAPT use (cases 6, 8 and 13 in table 1). Because of the high frequency of recurrence and necessity of DAPT, we advised her to avoid conception in the following year. She was married and had had a miscarriage before. Although she and her husband wanted a child, they did not want to encounter such threatening complication again. Finally, they adopted a child, and they have been happy since then.
Although standard therapy for SCAD in pregnant women has not been established, primary PCI may be one of the best methods to manage the ongoing ischaemia and improve patient outcomes. We succeeded in saving maternal life by performing CPR and subsequent PCI. After surviving the catastrophic event, we should consider reducing the duration of DAPT and using medication without any significant adverse effects on the mother or fetus. The next pregnancy should be postponed for at least a year after AMI considering the frequent recurrence of SCAD and prolonged DAPT therapy.
Finally, it is important to note that management of pregnancy involves taking care of both mother and fetus. All physicians in the emergency team, as well as obstetricians, should have the skills to manage CPA during pregnancy and be aware of the indications of PMCD. Taking careful and timely decisions with a multidisciplinary collaboration can help to provide an optimal treatment to such patients.
Learning points.
The patients survived from cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) due to acute coronary syndrome that occurred at 38 weeks of gestation.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for spontaneous coronary artery is one of the best methods to manage ongoing myocardial ischaemia.
Minimal medication should be continued, and physicians should follow up carefully due to the high rate of recurrence.
As CPA in pregnancy can be catastrophic for mother and fetus, the medical team should always make efforts to save both lives.
Knowledge and experience on the critical care in pregnancy should be disseminated, and the emergency team should be trained for such situations, which can occur any time.
Acknowledgments
Reprinted from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Volume 65, Issue 17, Supplement, Emiko Ejima, Yoshinobu Murasato, Acute Coronary Syndrome Caused by Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a 32-Year-Old Pregnant Woman, Pages S320-S321, Copyright 2017, with permission from Elsevier.
Footnotes
Contributors: All the authors contributed in patient care. EE, the corresponding author, wrote the first version of the manuscript. YM, the coauthor, supervised and finished this manuscript.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Roth A, Elkayam U. Acute myocardial infarction associated with pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:751–62. 10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.James AH, Jamison MG, Biswas MS, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy: a United States population-based study. Circulation 2006;113:1564–71. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.576751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brace V, Penney G, Hall M. Quantifying severe maternal morbidity: a Scottish population study. BJOG 2004;111:481–4. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00101.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tokura M, Taguchi I, Kageyama M, et al. Clinical features of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Cardiol 2014;63:119–22. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hasegawa T, Tabata H, Kagoshima M, et al. A case of pregnancy-associated acute myocardial infarction with refractory ventricular fibrillation and heart failure. J Cardiol Cases 2016;14:13–16. 10.1016/j.jccase.2016.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yilmaz S, Sahinkus S, Kilic H, et al. Acute Coronary Syndrome During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review. Turk J Emerg Med 2014;14:135–8. 10.5505/1304.7361.2014.05924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Emori T, Goto Y, Maeda T, et al. Multiple coronary artery dissections diagnosed in vivo in a pregnant woman. Chest 1993;104:289–90. 10.1378/chest.104.1.289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McKechnie RS, Patel D, Eitzman DT, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a pregnant woman. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:899–902. 10.1097/00006250-200111001-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vilas M, Pravir L. A case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in early pregnancy managed bi PCI. Indian Heart J 2016;68:25–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martins RP, Leurent G, Corbineau H, et al. Coronary angiography of pregnancy-associated coronary artery dissection: a high-risk procedure. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2010;11:182–5. 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jaiswal A, Rashid M, Balek M, et al. Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy: a clinical checkmate. Indian Heart J 2013;65:464–8. 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sundaram V, Chaudhry SP, Reddy YN, et al. Emergent cesarean section in the catheterization laboratory for spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Am J Cardiol 2015;115:1777–8. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aliyary S, Mariani MA, Verhorst PM, et al. Staged therapeutic approach in spontaneous coronary dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1879–81. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharma N, Seevanayagam S, Rayoo R, et al. Spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection in pregnancy. Int J Cardiol 2012;159:e11–e13. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sherif HM, Nguyen HC, Sarter BH, et al. Spontaneous coronary dissection in late pregnancy: a multidisciplinary approach to management. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1793–4. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schiff JH, Gries A, Ehehalt R, et al. A pregnant woman with acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery dissection: pre-hospital and in-hospital management. Resuscitation 2007;73:467–74. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al. American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 10: Special Circumstances of Resuscitation. Circulation 2015;132:501–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Truhlář A, Deakin CD, Soar J, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation 2015;95:148–201. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Berger TM, Bernet V, El Alama S, et al. Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;141:w13280 10.4414/smw.2011.13280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eldridge AJ, Ford R. Perimortem caesarean deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2016;27:46–54. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Einav S, Kaufman N, Sela HY. Maternal cardiac arrest and perimortem caesarean delivery: evidence or expert-based? Resuscitation 2012;83:1191–200. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nonga BN, Pasquet A, Noirhomme P, et al. Successful bovine arch replacement for a type A acute aortic dissection in a pregnant woman with severe haemodynamic compromise. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012;15:309–10. 10.1093/icvts/ivs143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Avila WS, Gouveia AM, Pomerantzeff P, et al. Maternal-fetal outcome and prognosis of cardiac surgery during pregnancy. Arq Bras Cardiol 2009;93:8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mahli A, Izdes S, Coskun D. Cardiac operations during pregnancy: review of factors influencing fetal outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1622–6. 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01178-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ngo Nonga B, Pasquet A, De Kherkove L, et al. Emergent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in early pregnancy: report of four cases. Res Cardiovasc Med 2013;2:140–4. 10.5812/cardiovascmed.11281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Motomatsu Y, Sonoda H, Oishi Y, et al. Emergent Redo-Mitral Valve Replacement during Pregnancy at 23 Weeks and 4 Days of Gestation due to Bioprosthetic Valve Deterioration. Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2013;42:425–9. 10.4326/jjcvs.42.425 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Baghirzada L, Balki M. Maternal cardiac arrest in a tertiary care centre during 1989-2011: a case series. Can J Anaesth 2013;60:1077–84. 10.1007/s12630-013-0021-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cohen SE, Andes LC, Carvalho B. Assessment of knowledge regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation of pregnant women. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17:20–5. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Berkenstadt H, Ben-Menachem E, Dach R, et al. Deficits in the provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simulated obstetric crises: results from the Israeli Board of Anesthesiolog201ists. Anesth Analg 2012;115:1122–6. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182691977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dijkman A, Huisman CM, Smit M, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training? BJOG 2010;117:282–7. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02461.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakashima T, Noguchi T, Haruta S, et al. Prognostic impact of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report from the Angina Pectoris-Myocardial Infarction Multicenter Investigators in Japan. Int J Cardiol 2016;207:341–8. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, et al. Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Circulation 2012;126:579–88. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:645–55. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

