Skip to main content
Oncoscience logoLink to Oncoscience
. 2017 Aug 23;4(7-8):95–105. doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.357

Beta-adrenergic receptors are expressed across diverse cancers

Steven L Rains 1, Clarissa N Amaya 1, Brad A Bryan 1
PMCID: PMC5616202  PMID: 28966942

Abstract

Based largely on retrospective analyses and a handful of prospective case reports, pharmacological inhibition of the beta adrenergic receptors using beta blockers has shown clinical anti-cancer efficacy in reproductive cancers, as well as angiosarcoma and multiple myeloma. Because of the potential promise of beta blockers as an adjunct to standard anti-cancer therapy, it is imperative to identify other tumor types expressing beta adrenergic (β-AR) receptors so future preclinical and clinical studies can be directed at the most promising tumor targets. We performed immunohistochemical detection of β1-AR, β2-AR, and β3-AR across 29 of the most common human cancer types (389 tissues total) and 19 matching non-diseased controls (100 tissues total). Our analysis revealed all three β-AR receptors were expressed most strongly in melanoma relative to other cancer types. Other malignancies that revealed relatively higher levels of β-AR receptors were esophagus, pancreas, kidney, and lung cancers. Moreover, particular β-AR receptors exhibited significant overexpression in tumor tissue relative to their matching normal tissue in urogenital/reproductive malignancies including breast, endometrium, ovarian, and urothelial cancer, as well as colon, lung, and thyroid cancer. This study identifies several cancer types expressing the β-AR receptors which should be evaluated in future studies for susceptibility to beta blockade.

Keywords: beta adrenergic, beta blocker, cancer

INTRODUCTION

Beta adrenergic (β-AR) receptors are G-protein coupled receptors responsible for mediating vasodilation following stimulation by the catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine [1, 2]. When activated, the β-AR receptors induce intracellular signal transduction pathways through triggering cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cAMP-dependent protein kinase A cascades [1, 2]. This leads to endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-mediated release of nitric oxide to induce vasodilation and synthesis of pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor to promote angiogenesis [1, 2].

Three different β-AR receptors have been identified in humans, and are widely expressed in vascular tissues [25]. β-AR1 receptors are primarily expressed in cardiac tissue where they perform vital roles in regulating cardiac output, and additional expression has been detected in the urinary bladder and cerebral cortex [6]. β-AR2 receptors are expressed at high density in the lung on bronchial smooth muscles, bronchial epithelial cells, and multiple immune cells [7, 8]. β-AR3 is abundant in brown adipose tissue and performs significant roles in lipolysis and thermogenesis [9].

The β-AR signaling pathway drives the pathogenesis of the benign vascular tumor infantile hemangioma [10, 11] and several malignant tumor types including angiosarcoma [1216], breast cancer [17], and ovarian cancer [18]. Pharmacological inhibition of the β-AR receptors with beta blockers has shown clinical efficacy against infantile hemangiomas and angiosarcomas [10, 12-15, 19] and based on retrospective studies of large patient cohorts, beta blockers contribute to improving overall survival and decreasing tumor proliferation across a several common cancer types [17, 18, 2022]. Due to these findings, in late 2016 the beta blocker propranolol was assigned Orphan Drug Designation in Europe for use in soft tissue sarcomas. With promises of a potentially low cost adjuvant therapy for certain cancers, it is imperative to determine if other more common cancers express the β-AR receptors, and thus could be clinically susceptible to beta blockade.

To accomplish this, we determined the expression of β-AR1, β-AR2, and β-AR3 receptors across 29 tumor types representing the most common cancers found in humans and 19 matching normal tissues using high density tissue microarrays. The knowledge gained from this study will allow researchers and clinicians to efficiently target the most promising cancer types that express the β-AR receptors.

RESULTS

Numerous studies have examined the expression of the β-AR receptors primarily in the heart, lung, and vascular tissues due to the effects of beta blockers on these tissues [23]. Interestingly, new databases such as GTEx Portal (www.gtexportal.org), BioGPS (www.biogps.org), and the Human Protein Atlas (www.proteinatlas.org) reveal that β-AR mRNA and protein are surprisingly expressed at variable levels across a large number of normal and diseased tissues.

We analyzed the expression of β-AR proteins across 19 normal tissues comprising epithelial, mesenchymal, and hematopoietic lineages (Figure 1). Relatively higher expression of β1-AR protein was found in brain, pancreas, and thyroid (Figure 1A); β2-AR was highest in pancreas, stomach, and thyroid (Figure 1B); and β3-AR was highest in colon, kidney, lymph nodes, pancreas, skin, and stomach (Figure 1C). Many normal tissues expressed little to no β-AR receptors, including colon, esophagus, lung, ovary, skeletal muscle and uterus for β1-AR; bladder, lymph node, skeletal muscle, uterus, and ovary for β2-AR; and bladder, skeletal muscle, and ovary for β3-AR. Representative images of β-AR staining across selected normal tissues is shown in Figure 1D-1F.

Figure 1. β-AR receptor protein expression in normal tissues.

Figure 1

(A-C) Bar and whiskers plots of IHC staining for β1-AR (A), β2-AR (B), and β3-AR (C) across 19 normal human tissues. The staining intensity was evaluated using the following criteria: 0 = undetectable staining, 1 = equivocal/diffuse staining, 2 = weak staining, 3 = moderate staining, and 4 = strong staining. (D) Representative images of relatively higher β1-AR staining in brain (a), kidney (b), and pancreas (c), and no staining in ovary (d). (E) Representative images of relatively higher β2-AR staining in pancreas (a), stomach (b), and skin (c), and no staining in ovary (d). (F) Representative images of relatively higher β3-AR staining in colon (a), pancreas (b), and testis (c), and no staining in bladder (d).

Within cancer tissues, β1-AR was detected most highly in pancreas adenocarcinoma, melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, and esophagus adenocarcinoma (Figure 2). β2-AR was detected most highly in pancreas adenocarcinoma, melanoma, and lung adenocarcinoma (Figure 3). β3-AR was detected most highly in melanoma, and moderate levels of staining were observed across numerous cancer tissues (Figure 4), though the higher levels of β3-AR staining could be attributed to a relatively high affinity of the antibody to its antigen. Across all cancer tissues tested, melanoma exhibited the highest level of β-AR receptor expression.

Figure 2. β1-AR receptor protein expression in cancer tissues.

Figure 2

(A) Bar and whiskers plots of IHC staining for β1-AR across 29 human cancer types. The staining intensity was evaluated using the following criteria: 0 = undetectable staining, 1 = equivocal/diffuse staining, 2 = weak staining, 3 = moderate staining, and 4 = strong staining. (B) Representative images of β1-AR staining in esophagus adenocarcinoma (a), melanoma (b), and pancreas adenocarcinoma (c), and little/no staining in fibrosarcoma (d).

Figure 3. β2-AR receptor protein expression in cancer tissues.

Figure 3

(A) Bar and whiskers plots of IHC staining for β2-AR across 29 human cancer types. The staining intensity was evaluated using the following criteria: 0 = undetectable staining, 1 = equivocal/diffuse staining, 2 = weak staining, 3 = moderate staining, and 4 = strong staining. (B) Representative images of β2-AR staining in melanoma (a), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (b), and lung adenocarcinoma (c), and little/no staining in astrocytoma (d).

Figure 4. β3-AR receptor protein expression in cancer tissues.

Figure 4

(A) Bar and whiskers plots of IHC staining for β3-AR across 29 human cancer types. The staining intensity was evaluated using the following criteria: 0 = undetectable staining, 1 = equivocal/diffuse staining, 2 = weak staining, 3 = moderate staining, and 4 = strong staining. (B) Representative images of β3-AR staining in melanoma (a), thyroid papillary carcinoma (b), and diffuse B-cell lymphoma (c), and little/no staining in fibrosarcoma (d).

To evaluate if the β-AR receptors are overexpressed in any of the cancers analyzed in this study, we performed the Mann-Whitney rank sum test to compare IHC scores between normal and cancer tissues. Using a very strict statistical cutoff (p<0.01), we identified a number of cancers that exhibited overexpression for individual β-AR receptors (Table 1). Interestingly, urogenital/reproductive cancers including breast, endometrium, ovarian, and urothelial cancers were overrepresented tumors exhibiting β-AR receptor overexpression.

Table 1. Overexpression of β-AR receptors in cancer.

Tissue type IHC score normal vs cancer p value
β1-AR
Colon adenocarcinoma 0.4 vs 1.9 0.001
β2-AR
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma 0.0 vs 1.1 0.01
Ovary mucinous adenocarcinoma 0.0 vs 1.6 <0.001
Urothelial carcinoma 0.2 vs 1.3 0.01
β3-AR
Breast invasive ductal carcinoma 0.8 vs 3.0 0.005
Lung squamous cell carcinoma 0.8 vs 2.7 0.01
Ovary mucinous adenocarcinoma 0.0 vs 2.4 <0.001
Ovary serous cystadenocarcinoma 0.0 vs 1.9 <0.001
Thyroid follicular carcinoma 0.0 vs 1.9 <0.001
Thyroid papillary carcinoma 0.0 vs 2.7 <0.001
Urothelial cancer 0.2 vs 2.2 <0.001

IHC scores are presented as the median score for each tissue type.

p value<0.01 (CI=95) was considered statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

In this study we evaluated the protein expression of the three β-AR receptors across a large panel of normal and cancer tissues, showing that these proteins are absent to weakly expressed across many tissues, with moderate to strong expression observed in select tissues. We additionally discovered that the β-AR receptors were overexpressed in several cancer types, particularly in urogenital and reproductive tumors. Although IHC detection of the β-AR receptors is not necessarily indicative of the level of tumor responsiveness to β-blockade, it does help identify β-AR positive cancers that may benefit from this emerging treatment, while excluding cancers from future studies that do not express these receptors.

The β-AR receptors are expressed in normal vessels [25] and have more recently been detected in various vascular tumors including hemangiomas, hemangioendotheliomas, and angiosarcomas [13, 16, 24, 25]. Indeed, beta blockade has shown remarkable efficacy in numerous clinical settings against infantile hemangiomas [10, 19], hemangioendothelioma [2628], and angiosarcoma [1215]. Due to the success of propranolol against angiosarcoma, this drug has recently received Orphan Drug Designation by the European Medicines Agency for use against soft tissue sarcomas.

In this study we demonstrated that the β-AR receptors are expressed across multiple cancers, thus it is possible that beta blockade could show efficacy against additional tumor types. Indeed, retrospective studies of individuals taking beta blockers have revealed remarkably improved survival outcomes for patients with multiple cancer types [18, 20, 22], decreased cancer recurrence in stage II breast cancer patients [21], and decreased tumor proliferation rates in stage I breast cancer patients [17]. Due to these findings, a number of clinical trials testing the efficacy of propranolol as an anticancer agent are currently ongoing. The benefit of this report lies in identifying cancer types that express the β-AR receptors which are most likely to benefit from beta blockade therapy, and to potentially exclude tumor types which do not express β-AR receptors and likely would show no benefit from beta blockade. Based on our findings, future studies should focus heavily on melanoma, as all three β-AR receptors were most highly expressed in this cancer type. Supporting evidence for use of beta blockers in melanoma comes from several recent studies, whereby propranolol induces cell cycle arrest of melanoma cells [29], promotes anti-tumor immunity in a melanoma tumor model [30], and inhibits B16F10 melanoma xenografts at low doses [31]. Based on moderate levels of β-AR expression, other tumor types of interest for future study would be cancers of the esophagus, pancreas, kidney, and lung.

Overexpression of the β-AR receptors has been reported in breast cancer [17, 32], and our analysis uncovered multiple cancers which exhibited overexpression of β-AR receptors relative to their normal non-diseased tissue counterparts. These included urogenital/reproductive malignancies including breast, endometrium, ovarian, and urothelial cancer, as well as colon, lung, and thyroid cancer. It is possible that overexpression of the β-AR receptors could impart tumor sensitivity to beta blockade, though a previous report in breast cancer has shown no correlation between the levels of β-AR receptor mRNA in the tumor cells and sensitivity to propranolol [17]. Moreover, β-AR receptors are expressed at high levels in multiple endothelial cell types [25], yet exhibit clinically effective selectivity against vascular tumors [10, 19]. Future preclinical and clinical studies should focus on clarifying this conundrum, and identifying reliable biomarkers of propranolol susceptibility in tumors.

The observations reported in this study will help to identify β-AR receptor positive tumors types so that future efforts evaluating the anti-cancer efficacy of beta blockade can be directed at the most promising targets. Furthermore, identification of tumor types with equivocal or non-detectable levels of β-AR receptors will guide future studies in avoiding tumors potentially non-responsive to beta blockade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue microarrays

Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was performed on a clinically annotated tissue microarray (US Biomax #MC5003b) containing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor (N=389) and normal (N=100) tissues from human patients. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to confirm the classification of all tumors. The clinicopathological features of these tissues are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Clinicopathological features of patient tissue samples.

Pathology Sample # Median Age Sex
Normal Tissues
Bladder 5 33.2 4M; 1F
Brain 5 36.8 4F; 1M
Breast 5 42.8 5F
Cervix 5 48.8 5F
Colon 5 31.8 5M
Esophagus 5 32.4 4M; 1F
Kidney 5 35.8 4M; 1F
Liver 5 38.8 4M; 1F
Lung 5 34.8 2M; 2F
Lymph node 5 32.0 3M; 2F
Ovary 5 36.8 5F
Pancreas 5 33.6 4M; 1F
Prostate 5 34.2 5M
Skin 10 32.6 6M; 4F
Skeletal Muscle 5 37.4 5M
Stomach 5 28.2 4M; 1F
Testis 5 40.6 5M
Thyroid 5 32.6 3M; 2F
Uterus 5 23.6 5F
Cancer Tissues
Astrocytoma 9 35.2 4M; 6F
Breast, Invasive ductal carcinoma 20 51.1 20F
Cervix, squamous cell carcinoma 20 44.0 20F
Colon adenocarcinoma 20 52.9 12M;8F
Diffuse B cell lymphoma 9 44.7 3M; 6F
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma 20 54.7 20F
Esophagus adenocarcinoma 10 62.6 9M; 1F
Fibrosarcoma 10 35.1 4M; 6F
Glioblastoma 11 48.9 6M; 5F
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 15 63.1 12M; 3F
Hepatocellular carcinoma 20 52.0 16M; 4F
Hodgkin's lymphoma 10 30.1 9M; 1F
Kidney, clear cell carcinoma 20 56.1 16M; 4F
Lung, adenocarcinoma 10 56.7 7M; 3F
Lung, squamous cell carcinoma 10 55.6 9M; 1F
Melanoma 20 55.8 14M; 6F
Myxoid liposarcoma 4 53.5 2M; 2F
Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma 5 49.4 4M; 1F
Ovary, mucinous adenocarcinoma 9 44.0 9F
Ovary, serous cystadenocarcinoma 11 45.0 11F
Pancreas, adenocarcinoma 20 55.3 12M; 8F
Prostate, adenocarcinoma 20 70.5 20M
Stomach adenocarcinoma 20 56.1 17M; 3F
Testicular embryonal carcinoma 5 27.6 5M
Testicular seminoma 15 42.4 15M
Thyroid, follicular carcinoma 10 50.5 1M; 9F
Thyroid, papillary carcinoma 10 41.6 2M; 8F
Urothelial carcinoma 20 59.8 15M; 5F
Well differentiated liposarcoma 6 51.5 4M; 2F

M = male; F = female.

Immunohistochemistry

Expression of the three β-AR receptors was evaluated using IHC for each tissue section. The primary antibodies used were anti-β1-AR (Abbiotech #250919; 1:100 dilution, citrate induced antigen retrieval), β2-AR (Abbiotech #251604; 1:100 dilution, citrate induced antigen retrieval), or β3-AR (Abbiotech #251434; 1:100 dilution, citrate induced antigen retrieval) under conditions previously reported [16, 17]. The β-AR IHC reactions were visualized using HRP/DAB (ABC) Detection IHC Kit (Abcam #ab64264). The staining intensity specifically in the normal and tumor cells was evaluated using the following criteria: 0 = undetectable staining, 1 = equivocal/diffuse staining, 2 = weak staining, 3 = moderate staining, and 4 = strong staining. The Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used to assess statistical analysis of β-AR expression between the normal and tumor tissues.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dolores Diaz and Jaime Rios from the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Pathology core for IHC staining of normal and cancer tissues.

Abbreviations

β-AR

beta adrenergic receptor

β-AR1

beta adrenergic receptor 1

β-AR2

beta adrenergic receptor 2

β-AR3

beta adrenergic receptor 3

cAMP

cyclic adenosine monophosphate

DAB

3,3′-diaminobenzidine

HRP

horse radish peroxidase

IHC

immunohistochemistry

NOS

nitric oxide synthase

Footnotes

Author contributions

SLR—quantification of tissue IHC, generation of graphs, review and agree to final manuscript

CAN—quantification of tissue IHC, review and agree to final manuscript

BAB—statistical analysis tissue IHC, review and agree to final manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

FUNDING

This study was supported by a grant from the Texas Emerging Technology Fund to BAB.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sorriento D, Trimarco B, Iaccarino G. Adrenergic mechanism in the control of endothelial function. Transl Med UniSa. 2011;1:213–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taira N, Yabuuchi Y, Yamashita S. Profile of beta-adrenoceptors in femoral, superior mesenteric and renal vascular beds of dogs. Br J Pharmacol. 1977;59:577–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1977.tb07724.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abdelrahman A, Tabrizchi R, Pang CC. Effects of beta 1-and beta 2-adrenoceptor stimulation on hemodynamics in the anesthetized rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15:720–8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199005000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lands AM, Arnold A, McAuliff JP, Luduena FP, Brown TG., Jr Differentiation of receptor systems activated by sympathomimetic amines. Nature. 1967;214:597–8. doi: 10.1038/214597a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zwaveling J, Winkler Prins EA, Pfaffendorf M, van Zwieten PA. The influence of hyperthyroidism on beta-adrenoceptor-mediated relaxation of isolated small mesenteric arteries. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1996;353:438–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00261441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Insel PA, Hammond HK. Beta-adrenergic receptors in heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:2564. doi: 10.1172/JCI116867. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McGraw DW, Forbes SL, Mak JC, Witte DP, Carrigan PE, Leikauf GD, Liggett SB. Transgenic overexpression of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors in airway epithelial cells decreases bronchoconstriction. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;279:L379–89. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.279.2.L379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Turki J, Green SA, Newman KB, Meyers MA, Liggett SB. Human lung cell beta 2-adrenergic receptors desensitize in response to in vivo administered beta-agonist. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:L709–14. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1995.269.5.L709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balligand JL. Beta3-adrenoreceptors in cardiovasular diseases: new roles for an “old” receptor. Curr Drug Deliv. 2013;10:64–6. doi: 10.2174/1567201811310010011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leaute-Labreze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taieb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2649–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0708819. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc0708819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stiles J, Amaya C, Pham R, Rowntree RK, Lacaze M, Mulne A, Bischoff J, Kokta V, Boucheron LE, Mitchell DC, Bryan BA. Propranolol treatment of infantile hemangioma endothelial cells: A molecular analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2012;4:594–604. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.654. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2012.654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Banavali S, Pasquier E, Andre N. Targeted therapy with propranolol and metronomic chemotherapy combination: sustained complete response of a relapsing metastatic angiosarcoma. Ecancermedicalscience. 2015;9:499. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.499. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2015.499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chow W, Amaya CN, Rains S, Chow M, Dickerson EB, Bryan BA. Growth Attenuation of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma With Propranolol-Mediated beta-Blockade. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:1226–9. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2554. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Daguze J, Saint-Jean M, Peuvrel L, Cassagnau E, Quereux G, Khammari A, Dreno B. Visceral metastatic angiosarcoma treated effectively with oral cyclophosphamide combined with propranolol. JAAD Case Rep. 2016;2:497–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.10.005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pasquier E, Andre N, Street J, Chougule A, Rekhi B, Ghosh J, Philip DS, Meurer M, MacKenzie KL, Kavallaris M, Banavali SD. Effective Management of Advanced Angiosarcoma by the Synergistic Combination of Propranolol and Vinblastine-based Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Bench to Bedside Study. EBioMedicine. 2016;6:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stiles JM, Amaya C, Rains S, Diaz D, Pham R, Battiste J, Modiano JF, Kokta V, Boucheron LE, Mitchell DC, Bryan BA. Targeting of beta adrenergic receptors results in therapeutic efficacy against models of hemangioendothelioma and angiosarcoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Montoya A, Amaya CN, Belmont A, Diab N, Trevino R, Villanueva G, Rains S, Sanchez LA, Badri N, Otoukesh S, Khammanivong A, Liss D, Baca ST, et al. Use of non-selective beta-blockers is associated with decreased tumor proliferative indices in early stage breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:6446–6460. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14119. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Watkins JL, Thaker PH, Nick AM, Ramondetta LM, Kumar S, Urbauer DL, Matsuo K, Squires KC, Coleman RL, Lutgendorf SK, Ramirez PT, Sood AK. Clinical impact of selective and nonselective beta-blockers on survival in patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2015;121:3444–51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29392. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leaute-Labreze C, Hoeger P, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Guibaud L, Baselga E, Posiunas G, Phillips RJ, Caceres H, Lopez Gutierrez JC, Ballona R, Friedlander SF, Powell J, Perek D, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:735–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404710. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1404710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Armaiz-Pena GN, Allen JK, Cruz A, Stone RL, Nick AM, Lin YG, Han LY, Mangala LS, Villares GJ, Vivas-Mejia P, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Nagaraja AS, Gharpure KM, et al. Src activation by beta-adrenoreceptors is a key switch for tumour metastasis. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1403. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2413. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Choy C, Raytis JL, Smith DD, Duenas M, Neman J, Jandial R, Lew MW. Inhibition of beta2-adrenergic receptor reduces triple-negative breast cancer brain metastases: The potential benefit of perioperative beta-blockade. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:3135–42. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4710. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hwa YL, Shi Q, Kumar SK, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Kapoor P, Buadi FK, Leung N, Dingli D, Go RS, Hayman SR, Gonsalves WI, Russell S, et al. Beta-blockers improve survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective evaluation. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:50–5. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24582. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Strosberg AD. Structure-function analysis of the three beta-adrenergic catecholamine receptors. Psychopharmacol Ser. 1993;10:9–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78010-3_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chisholm KM, Chang KW, Truong MT, Kwok S, West RB, Heerema-McKenney AE. beta-Adrenergic receptor expression in vascular tumors. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1446–51. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.108. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2012.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Phillips JD, Zhang H, Wei T, Richter GT. Expression of beta-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes in Proliferative, Involuted, and Propranolol-Responsive Infantile Hemangiomas. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1188. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chatmethakul T, Bhat R, Alkaabi M, Siddiqui A, Peevy K, Zayek M. Infantile Hepatic Hemangioendothelioma: An Uncommon Cause of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension in a Newborn Infant. AJP Rep. 2016;6:e260–3. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1585578. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1585578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Filippi L, Tamburini A, Berti E, Perrone A, Defilippi C, Favre C, Calvani M, Della Bona ML, la Marca G, Donzelli G. Successful Propranolol Treatment of a Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma Apparently Resistant to Propranolol. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63:1290–2. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25979. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Uppuluri R, Kumar V, Munirathnam D, Doss H, Ramachandrakurup S, Subburaj D, Raj R. Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma in a 3 Months Old Infant. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2016;32:370–1. doi: 10.1007/s12288-016-0674-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-016-0674-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou C, Chen X, Zeng W, Peng C, Huang G, Li X, Ouyang Z, Luo Y, Xu X, Xu B, Wang W, He R, Zhang X, et al. Propranolol induced G0/G1/S phase arrest and apoptosis in melanoma cells via AKT/MAPK pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7:68314–27. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11599. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jean Wrobel L, Bod L, Lengagne R, Kato M, Prevost-Blondel A, Le Gal FA. Propranolol induces a favourable shift of anti-tumor immunity in a murine spontaneous model of melanoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:77825–37. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12833. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maccari S, Buoncervello M, Rampin A, Spada M, Macchia D, Giordani L, Stati T, Bearzi C, Catalano L, Rizzi R, Gabriele L, Marano G. Biphasic effects of propranolol on tumour growth in B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174:139–49. doi: 10.1111/bph.13662. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gargiulo L, Copsel S, Rivero EM, Gales C, Senard JM, Luthy IA, Davio C, Bruzzone A. Differential beta(2)-adrenergic receptor expression defines the phenotype of non-tumorigenic and malignant human breast cell lines. Oncotarget. 2014;5:10058–69. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2460. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncoscience are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES