Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 27;8(37):61786–61799. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18692

Table 4. Association between potential prognostic factors, and RFS and DSS in the validation study of immunohistochemical staining.

Variable n RFS DSS
Hazed
ratio
95%CI P-value Hazard
ratio
95%CI P-value
Age (years)
 ≥45 101 Reference 0.687-2.111 0.515 Reference 0.279-1.441 0.276
 <45 26 1.205 0.634
Gender
 Male 97 Reference 0.449-1.347 0.369 Reference 0.545-2.020 0.886
 Female 30 0.777 1.049
Treatment
 Mono-modality* 112 Reference 0.276-1.193 0.137 Reference 0.257-1.506 0.293
 Multi-modality** 15 0.574 0.623
pTstage
 T1-2 36 Reference 0.655-1.758 0.780 Reference 0.657-2.160 0.564
 T3-4 91 1.073 1.191
pNstage
 N0-1 45 Reference 1.053-2.970 0.031 Reference 1.064-3.885 0.032
 N2-3 82 1.769 2.033
Positive Margin
 Absent 107 Reference 0.826-2.702 0.184 Reference 0.848-3.433 0.134
 Present 20 1.494 1.707
Extranodal spread of lymph node metastasis
 Absent 96 Reference 0.919-2.506 0.103 Reference 0.936-3.266 0.08
 Present 31 1.518 1.748
CK4
 Negative 87 Reference 0.354-0.988 0.045 Reference 0.159-0.697 0.004
 Positive 40 0.591 0.333

NOTE: Analysis uses a multivariate cox regression models for RFS and DSS using variables risk factors including CK4 protein expression. *Surgery alone **Surgery with adjuvant treatment. RFS, relapse-free survival; DSS, disease specific survival; CI, confidential interval; CK4, Cytokeratin 4.