Skip to main content
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2017 Jul 8;8(37):62111–62119. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19095

A patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model of a cisplatinum-resistant osteosarcoma lung metastasis that was sensitive to temozolomide and trabectedin: implications for precision oncology

Kentaro Igarashi 1,2,3, Takashi Murakami 1,2, Kei Kawaguchi 1,2, Tasuku Kiyuna 1,2, Kentaro Miyake 1,2, Yong Zhang 1, Scott D Nelson 5, Sarah M Dry 5, Yunfeng Li 5, Jane Yanagawa 6, Tara A Russell 6, Arun S Singh 4, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya 3, Irmina Elliott 6, Fritz C Eilber 6, Robert M Hoffman 1,2
PMCID: PMC5617490  PMID: 28977930

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of trabectedin (TRAB) and temozolomide (TEM) compared to cisplatinum (CDDP) on a patient-derived orthotopic xenogrraft (PDOX) of a lung-metastasis from an osteosarcoma of a patient who failed CDDP therapy. Osteosarcoma resected from the patient was implanted orthotopically in the distal femur of mice to establish PDOX models which were randomized into the following groups when tumor volume reached approximately 100 mm3: G1, control without treatment; G2, CDDP (6 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection, weekly, for 2 weeks); G3, TRAB (0.15 mg/kg, intravenous injection, weekly, for 2 weeks); G4, TEM (25 mg/kg, oral, daily, for 14 days). Tumor size and body weight were measured with calipers and a digital balance, respectively, twice a week. On day 14 after initiation of treatment, TEM and TRAB, but not CDDP, significantly inhibited tumor volume compared to untreated control: control (G1): 814.5±258.8 mm3; CDDP (G2): 608.6±126.9 mm3; TRAB (G3): 286.6±133.0 mm3; TEM (G4): 182.9±69.1 mm3. CDDP vs. control, p=0.07; TRAB vs. control, p=0.0004; TEM vs. control p =0.0002; TRAB vs. CDDP, p =0.0002; TEM vs. CDDP, p =0.00003. The results of the present study show that a PDOX model of an osteosarcoma lung-metastasis that recurred after adjuvant CDDP-treatment has identified potentially, highly-effective drugs for this recalcitrant disease, while accurately maintaining the CDDP resistance of the tumor in the patient, thereby demonstrating the potential of the osteosarcoma PDOX model for precision oncology.

Keywords: osteosarcoma, recurrence, lung metastasis, PDOX, chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Osteosarcoma is a mesenchymal tumor comprising spindle cells and osteoid formation. Osteosarcoma incidence is greatest in adolescence and again in the seventh and eighth decades. Osteosarcoma first-line therapy is high-dose methotrexate, cisplatinum (CDDP), doxorubicin, and ifosfamide. Metastatic osteosarcoma has a less than 20% long-term survival rate that has not improved for many years [17].

Temozolomide (TEM) has been used clinically against high-grade glioma [8], melanoma [9], and pediatric rhabdomyosarcomas [10]. TEM has been tested pre-clinically against osteosarcoma cells combined with a molecular targeting drug [11]. TEM has also been tested as a single-agent against 6 osteosarcoma xenograft models and achieved complete response in two and stable disease in one [12]. Methylation of the O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is correlated with sensitivity to TEM and may become as a biomarker for TEM. Methylation of the MGMT gene occurred in 23.5% of osteosarcoma patients in one study [13].

Trabectedin (TRAB) is an alkylating agent derived from the Caribbean tunicate, Ecteinascidia turbinate [14]. TRAB has been tested on patients with liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma [15, 16]. TRAB arrests cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle [17]. TRAB has shown efficacy against CDDP-resistant bone cancer in vitro [18]. TRAB is marketed as Yondelis (Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ) for leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma. (https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2015/fda-trabectedin-sarcoma).

TRAB has been used for recurrent osteosarcoma patients with a 12% partial response rate [19]. Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma that had the wild-type AAP1164 excision-repair cross-complementing 5 (ERCC5) gene had major responses to TRAB [20], suggesting this gene could be a biomarker for TRAB.

We previously reported that a subcutaneous transplant nude-mouse model of an ostoeosarcoma lung metastasis that occurred after adjuvant CDDP treatment of the patient, was regressed by tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R (S. typhimurium A1-R). The osteosarcoma was only partially sensitive to the molecular-targeting drug sorafenib, which did not arrest its growth. S. typhimurium A1-R was significantly more effective than sorafenib [21].

We previously developed the orthotopic intratibial-implantation model using a human osteosarcoma cell line in nude mice [22]. In the intratibial orthotopic osteosarcoma model, we observed by color-coded imaging, when high- and low-metastatic osteosarcoma cell lines were co-transplanted, there was gene exchange between the cell lines in vivo resulting in the conversion of the low-metastatic cell line to high-metastatic [23]. In another previous study from our laboratory, the intratibial orthotopic osteosarcoma model used fluorescent-protein-expressing human osteosarcoma cells in order to develop fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) which reduced multiple lung metastasis and thereby increased mouse survival time [24]. Echistatin, a cyclic RGD peptide, which is an antagonist of αvβ3 integrin (disintegrin), inhibited primary tumor growth as well as pulmonary metastases in a human osteosarcoma cell line in the intratibial orthotopic model used in a previous study in our laboratory [25].

Toward the goal of individualized precision oncology, our laboratory pioneered the patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model with the technique of surgical orthotopic implantation (SOI), including pancreatic [2629], breast [30], ovarian [31], lung [32], cervical [33], colon [3436], and stomach cancer [37], sarcoma [3842] and melanoma [4345].

In the present study, we tested a PDOX model established from an osteosarcoma lung metastasis that recurred after adjuvant cisplatinum treatment of the patient, for sensitivity to CDDP, TRAB and TEM.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Efficacy of CDDP, TRAB and TEM on the osteosarcoma PDOX mouse model

All drugs but CDDP significantly inhibited tumor volume compared to untreated control on day 14 after treatment initiation: control (G1): 814.5±258.8 mm3; CDDP (G2): 608.6±126.9 mm3; TRAB (G3): 286.6±133.0 mm3; TEM (G4): 182.9±69.1 mm3. CDDP vs. control, p=0.07; TRAB vs. control, p=0.0004; TEM vs. control, p =0.0002; TRAB vs. CDDP, p =0.0002; TEM vs. CDDP, p =0.00003; TEM vs. TRAB, p=0.025 (Figure 1). There were no animal deaths in any group. Body weight of the treated mice was not significantly different from untreated control in any group (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Efficacy of cisplatinum (CDDP), trabectedin (TRAB) and temozolomide (TEM) on the osteosarcoma PDOX.

Figure 1

Osteosarcoma tissue was grown orthotopically in the right distal femur of nude mice and allowed to form tumors. (A) Mice were treated with CDDP (6 mg/kg, i.p., qw×2); TRAB (0.15 mg/kg, i.v., qw×2); and TEM (25 mg/kg, p.o., qd×14). Tumor volume was measured at the indicated time points after the onset of treatment. n=8 mice/group. (B) Tumor growth curves of treated and untreated mice. (C) Photos of representative treated and untreated osteosarcoma PDOX models. * p< 0.05, **p< 0.001

Figure 2. Body weights after CDDP, TRAB and TEM treatment.

Figure 2

Bar graph shows body weight in each group at pre-treatment and 2 weeks after drug administration

Histology of original patient tumor and control and treated tumors

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections were made from the patient and mouse-grown tumors. The original patient osteosarcoma tumor had hypercellular areas populated by anaplastic cells displaying nuclear pleomorphism, coarse and hyperchromatic chromatin and abundant mitotic figures (Figure 3A). The subcutaneously-implanted mouse-grown tumor contained hypercellular areas with anaplastic cells displaying nuclear pleomorphism, coarse and hyperchromatic chromatin and mitotic figures. A chondroid matrix was less abundant compared to the original patient tumor (Figure 3B). The low magnification image of the untreated PDOX tumor shows cortical and medullary infiltration of tumor as well as muscle infiltration (Figure 3C). A high power photomicrograph of the untreated PDOX tumor shows a chondroblastic appearance similar to the patient’s original tumor with hypercellular areas filled with tumor cells displaying nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic figures (Figure 3D). PDOX tumors treated with CDDP were comprised of viable cells without apparent necrosis or inflammatory changes and almost the same features compared to the untreated control (Figure 3E). Tumors treated with TRAB showed changes in cancer-cell shape with slight necrosis (Figure 3F). TEM-treated tumors showed more extensive tumor necrosis (Figure 3G), which is consistent with the superior efficacy of TEM.

Figure 3. Osteosarcoma histology.

Figure 3

H&E-stained sections of (A) the original patient tumor (micro). (B) Subcutaneously-implanted tumor (micro). (C) Orthotopically-implanted tumor (macro). (D) Orthotopically-implanted tumor (micro). (E) PDOX tumor treated with CDDP. (F) PDOX tumor treated with TRAB. (G) PDOX tumor treated with TEM. Necrotic areas are indicated by yellow arrows. Scale bars: 100 μm for (A, B, D). Black scale bar: 2 mm for C. Scale bars: 80 μm for (E-G).

Recurrent metastatic osteosarcoma that has failed first-line therapy is a recalcitrant cancer. The results of the present study suggest that novel active drugs can be identified for this disease using the PDOX model. Further studies are necessary to determine the clinical significant of the present findings. The PDOX model of lung metastatic osteosarcoma that failed CDDP treatment replicated the clinical outcome of CDDP treatment of the patient.

Previously-developed concepts and strategies of highly-selective tumor targeting can take advantage of molecular targeting of tumors, including tissue-selective therapy which focuses on unique differences between normal and tumor tissues [4651].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

Athymic nu/nu nude mice (AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA), 4–6 weeks old, were used in this study. Animals were housed in a barrier facility on a high efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA)-filtered rack under standard conditions of 12-hour light/dark cycles. The animals were fed an autoclaved laboratory rodent diet. All animal studies were conducted with an AntiCancer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)-protocol specifically approved for this study and in accordance with the principles and procedures outlined in the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals under Assurance Number A3873-1. In order to minimize any suffering of the animals, anesthesia and analgesics were used for all surgical experiments. Animals were anesthetized by subcutaneous injection of a 0.02 ml solution of 20 mg/kg ketamine, 15.2 mg/kg xylazine, and 0.48 mg/kg acepromazine maleate. The response of animals during surgery was monitored to ensure adequate depth of anesthesia. The animals were observed on a daily basis and humanely sacrificed by CO2 inhalation when they met the following humane endpoint criteria: severe tumor burden (more than 20 mm in diameter), prostration, significant body weight loss, difficulty breathing, rotational motion and body temperature drop.

Patient-derived tumor

The study was previously reviewed and approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB #10-001857) [17]. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient as part of the above-mentioned UCLA Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. A 16-year old patient with localized left-distal-femoral high-grade osteosarcoma underwent CDDP-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and limb salvage with distal femoral replacement. One year later, the osteosarcoma recurred with three bilateral metachronous pulmonary metastases. The patient was treated with curative surgery at the Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The patient did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy after tumor occurrence prior to lung surgery [21].

Surgical orthotopic implantation (SOI) for establishment of the PDOX osteosarcoma model

A lung metastasis from the osteosarcoma patient was previously established subcutaneously in mice [21]. Subcutaneously grown tumors were harvested and cut into small fragments (3-4 mm). After nude mice were anesthetized, a 10 mm skin incision was made on the right thigh, the vastus lateralis muscle was opened and the biceps femoris muscle was split to reach the distal femur. An incision was made in the lateral patello-femoral ligament, sparing the knee joint and then the lateral condyle of the femur was resected. A single 3 to 4 mm tumor fragment was implanted orthotopically into the space to establish a PDOX model. The muscle and wound was closed with 6-0 nylon suture (Ethilon, Ethicon, Inc., NJ, USA) (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Establishment of the osteosarcoma PDOX model.

Figure 4

(A) A skin incision was made on the right thigh. (B) The vastas lateralis muscle and biceps femoris muscle were split to reach the distal femur. (C) The lateral condyle of the distal femur was resected. (D) A single 3 mm tumor fragment was implanted orthotopically into the space. (E) The muscle was closed with a 6-0 nylon suture. (F) The tumor fragment was totally covered by the muscle.

Treatment design

The PDOX models were randomized into the following groups when tumor volumes reached 100 mm3: G1, control without treatment, n=8; G2, CDDP (6 mg/kg, intraperitoneal [i.p.] qw×2, n=8); G3, TRAB (0.15 mg/kg, intravenous [i.v.], qw×2, n=8); G4, TEM (25 mg/kg, per oral [p.o.], qd×14, n=8). The schedule for TRAB and TEM, as well as CDDP, were obtained from previously published results [4345, 52]. Tumor length, width and mouse body weight were measured twice in a week. Tumor volume was calculated by following formula: Tumor volume (mm3) = length (mm) × width (mm) × width (mm) × 1/2. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Histological analysis

Fresh tumor samples were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin before sectioning and staining. Tissue sections (3 μm) were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in an ethanol series. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed according to standard protocol. Histological examination was performed with a BHS system microscope. Images were acquired with INFINITY ANALYZE software (Lumenera Corporation, Ottawa, Canada).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the PDOX model identified TEM and TRAB as potential effective drugs for a recurrent, recalcitrant, CDDP-resistant metastatic osteosarcoma. The PDOX model precisely replicated the CDDP resistance of the patients recurring lung metastasis, suggesting the patient will have a possibility to respond to TEM or TRAB, which were effective in the PDOX model. Our results are of particular importance for TRAB, which is marketed as Yondelis for leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma, since the results demonstrate activity of this drug in CDDP-resistant metastatic osteosarcoma. However, further studies are needed to determine the clinical potential of TRAB for this disease. In particular, more effective schedules of TRAB, as well as combination drugs need to be identified in the PDOX models at doses that can also be achieved clinically.

Future experiments will include mechanistic experiments on the differential activity of TRAB and TEM compared to CDDP as well as identifying molecular-signaling pathways that are activated by these compounds, especially in PDOX models of patients that express biomarkers for these drugs.

Our results show the potential of the PDOX model for refractory, recurrent osteosarcoma model for precision oncology.

Both TRAB and TEM showed strong inhibition (Figure 1B, 1C) almost arresting tumor growth and causing extensive tumor necrosis (Figure 3F, 3G). This very promising result will be used in future experiments to design combination drug experiments in order to obtain tumor regression in PDOX models and thereby be of potential use for clinical efficacy.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This study was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute grant CA213649.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bacci G, Ferrari S, Lari S, Mercuri M, Donati D, Longhi A, Forni C, Bertoni F, Versari M, Pignotti E. Osteosarcoma of the limb: amputation or limb salvage in patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:88–92. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ranalletta M. Partial epiphyseal preservation and intercalary allograft reconstruction in high-grade metaphyseal osteosarcoma of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2686–2693. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200412000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simon MA, Aschliman MA, Thomas N, Mankin HJ. Limb salvage treatment versus amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1331–1337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lewis VO. What’s new in musculoskeletal oncology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1399–1407. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meyers PA, Gorlick R, Heller G, Casper E, Lane J, Huvos AG, Healey JH. Intensification of preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: results of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering (T-12) protocol. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2452–2458. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fuchs N, Bielack SS, Epler D, Bieling P, Delling G, Körholz D, Graf N, Heise U, Jürgens H, Kotz R, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Weinel P, Werner M, et al. Long-term results of the cooperative German-Austrian-Swiss osteosarcoma study group’s protocol COSS-86 of intensive multidrug chemotherapy and surgery for osteosarcoma of the limbs. Ann Oncol. 1998;9:893–899. doi: 10.1023/a:1008391103132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bacci G, Briccoli A, Ferrari S, Longhi A, Mercuri M, Capanna R, Donati D, Lari S, Forni C, DePaolis M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremity: long-term results of the Rizzoli’s 4th protocol. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:2030–2039. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00229-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yung WK, Prados MD, Yaya-Tur R, Rosenfeld SS, Brada M, Friedman HS, Albright R, Olson J, Chang SM, O’Neill AM, Friedman AH, Bruner J, Yue N, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumor Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2762–2771. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bleehen NM, Newlands ES, Lee SM, Thatcher N, Selby P, Calvert AH, Rustin GJ, Brampton M, Stevens MF. Cancer Research Campaign phase II trial of temozolomide in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:910–913. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Winter S, Fasola S, Brisse H, Mosseri V, Orbach D. Relapse after localized rhabdomyosarcoma: evaluation of the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:1935–1941. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Engert F, Kovac M, Baumhoer D, Nathrath M, Fulda S. Osteosarcoma cells with genetic signatures of BRCAness are susceptible to the PARP inhibitor talazoparib alone or in combination with chemotherapeutics. Oncotarget. 2017;8:48794–48806. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Keir ST, Maris JM, Reynolds CP, Kang MH, Kolb EA, Gorlick R, Lock R, Carol H, Morton CL, Wu J, Kurmasheva RT, Houghton PJ, Smith MA. Initial testing (stage 1) of temozolomide by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:783–790. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cui Q, Jiang W, Guo J, Liu C, Li D, Wang X, Zeng Y. Relationship between hypermethylated MGMT gene and osteosarcoma necrosis rate after chemotherapy. Pathol Oncol Res. 2011;17:587–591. doi: 10.1007/s12253-010-9354-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cuevas C, Francesch A. Development of Yondelis (trabectedin, ET-743). A semisynthetic process solves the supply problem. Nat Prod Rep. 2009;26:322–337. doi: 10.1039/b808331m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Le Cesne A, Ray-Coquard I, Duffaud F, Chevreau C, Penel N, Bui Nguyen B, Piperno-Neumann S, Delcambre C, Rios M, Chaigneau L, Le Maignan C, Guillemet C, Bertucci F, et al. Trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective national analysis of the French Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:742–750. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Jones RL, Hensley ML, Schuetze S, Staddon AP, Milhem MM, Elias AD, Ganjoo KN, Tawbi HA, Van Tine BA, Spira AI, Dean AP, et al. A randomized phase III study of trabectedin (T) or dacarbazine (D) for the treatment of patients (pts) with advanced liposarcoma (LPS) or leiomyosarcoma (LMS) [abstract] J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:A10503. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Germano G, Frapolli R, Belgiovine C, Anselmo A, Pesce S, Liguori M, Erba E, Uboldi S, Zucchetti M, Pasqualini F, Nebuloni M, van Rooijen N, Mortarini R, et al. Role of macrophage targeting in the antitumor activity of trabectedin. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:249–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scotlandi K, Perdichizzi S, Manara MC, Serra M, Benini S, Cerisano V, Strammiello R, Mercuri M, Reverter-Branchat G, Faircloth G, D’Incalci M, Picci P. Effectiveness of Ecteinascidin-743 against drug-sensitive and -resistant bone tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:3893–3903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laverdiere C, Kolb EA, Supko JG, Gorlick R, Meyers PA, Maki RG, Wexler L, Demetri GD, Healey JH, Huvos AG, Goorin AM, Bagatell R, Ruiz-Casado A, et al. Phase II study of ecteinascidin 743 in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2003;98:832–840. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gastaud L, Saâda-Bouzid E, Le Morvan V, Pourquier P, Ianessi A, Thariat J, Italiano A, Thyss A. Major efficacy of trabectedin in 2 metastatic osteosarcoma patients with wild-type Asp1104 ERCC5 tumor status. Onkologie. 2013;36:670–673. doi: 10.1159/000355664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murakami T, Igarashi K, Kawaguchi K, Kiyuna T, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Hiroshima Y, Nelson SD, Dry SM, Li Y, Yanagawa J, Russell T, Federman N, et al. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R regresses an osteosarcoma in a patient-derived xenograft model resistant to a molecular-targeting drug. Oncotarget. 2017;8:8035–8042. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hayashi K, Zhao M, Yamauchi K, Yamamoto N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Kishimoto H, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. Systemic targeting of primary bone tumor and lung metastasis of high-grade osteosarcoma in nude mice with a tumor-selective strain of Salmonella typhimurium. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:870–875. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.6.7891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tome Y, Tsuchiya H, Hayashi K, Yamauchi K, Sugimoto N, Kanaya F, Tomita K, Hoffman RM. in vivo gene transfer between interacting human osteosarcoma cell lines is associated with acquisition of enhanced metastatic potential. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:362–367. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miwa S, Hiroshima Y, Yano S, Zhang Y, Matsumoto Y, Uehara F, Yamamoto M, Kimura H, Hayashi K, Bouvet M, Tsuchiya H, Hoffman RM. Fluorescence-guided surgery improves outcome in an orthotopic osteosarcoma nude-mouse model. J Orthop Res. 2014;32:1596–1601. doi: 10.1002/jor.22706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tome Y, Kimura H, Sugimoto N, Tsuchiya H, Kanaya F, Bouvet M, Hoffman RM. The disintegrin echistatin, in combination with doxorubicin targets high-metastastic human osteosarcoma overexpressing ανβ3 integrin in chick embryo and nude mouse models. Oncotarget. 2016;7:87031–87036. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Murakami T, Maawy A, Miwa S, Yamamoto M, Yano S, Sato S, Momiyama M, Mori R, Matsuyama R, Chishima T, Tanaka K, et al. Efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy on a pancreatic cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograph (PDOX) and cell line mouse models. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12346–12357. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fu X, Guadagni F, Hoffman RM. A metastatic nude-mouse model of human pancreatic cancer constructed orthotopically with histologically intact patient specimens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:5645–5649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Zhang Y, Murakami T, Momiyama M, Mori R, Matsuyama R, Katz MH, Fleming JB, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa Y, Endo I, et al. Metastatic recurrence in a pancreatic cancer patient derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model is inhibited by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with fluorescence-guided surgery with an anti-CA 19–9-conjugated fluorophore. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hiroshima Y, Maawy AA, Katz MH, Fleming JB, Bouvet M, Endo I, Hoffman RM. Selective efficacy of zoledronic acid on metastasis in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograph (PDOX) nude-mouse model of human pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:311–315. doi: 10.1002/jso.23816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fu X, Le P, Hoffma RM. A metastatic-orthotopic transplant nude-mouse model of human patient breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 1993;13:901–904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fu X, Hoffman RM. Human ovarian carcinoma metastatic models constructed in nude mice by orthotopic transplantation of histologically-intact patient specimens. Anticancer Res. 1993;13:283–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang X, Fu X, Hoffman RM. A new patient-like metastatic model of human lung cancer constructed orthotopically with intact tissue via thoracotomy in immunodeficient mice. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:992–995. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Maawy A, Mii S, Yamamoto M, Uehara F, Miwa S, Yano S, Murakami T, Momiyama M, Chishima T, Tanaka K, et al. Establishment of a patient-derived orthotopic xenograph (PDOX) model of HER-2-positive cervical cancer expressing the clinical metastatic pattern. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fu X, Besterman JM, Monosov A, Hoffman RM. Models of human metastatic colon cancer in nude mice orthotopically constructed by using histologically intact patient specimens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:9345–9349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Metildi CA, Kaushal S, Luiken GA, Talamini MA, Hoffman RM, Bouvet M. Fluorescently-labeled chimeric anti-CEA antibody improves detection and resection of human colon cancer in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109:451–458. doi: 10.1002/jso.23507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hiroshima Y, Maawy A, Metildi CA, Zhang Y, Uehara F, Miwa S, Yano S, Sato S, Murakami T, Momiyama M, Chishima T, Tanaka K, Bouvet M, et al. Successful fluorescence-guided surgery on human colon cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse models using a fluorophore-conjugated anti-CEA antibody and a portable imaging system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:241–247. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Furukawa T, Kubota T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M, Hoffman RM. Orthotopic transplantation of histologically intact clinical specimens of stomach cancer to nude mice: correlation of metastatic sites in mouse and individual patient donors. Int J Cancer. 1993;53:608–612. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murakami T, DeLong J, Eilber FC, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Singh A, Russell T, Deng S, Reynoso J, Quan C, Hiroshima Y, Matsuyama R, et al. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R in combination with doxorubicin eradicate soft tissue sarcoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft PDOX model. Oncotarget. 2016;7:12783–12790. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hiroshima Y, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Maawy A, Murakami T, Mii S, Uehara F, Yamamoto M, Miwa S, Yano S, Momiyama M, Mori R, et al. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R arrests a chemo-resistant patient soft-tissue sarcoma in nude mice. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kiyuna T, Murakami T, Tome Y, Kawaguchi K, Igarashi K, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Li Y, Bouvet M, Kanaya F, Singh A, Dry S, Eilber FC, et al. High efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on a doxorubicin- and dactolisib-resistant follicular dendritic-cell sarcoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft PDOX nude mouse model. Oncotarget. 2016;7:33046–33054. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Murakami T, Singh AS, Kiyuna T, Dry SM, Li Y, James AW, Igarashi K, Kawaguchi K, DeLong JC, Zhang Y, Hiroshima Y, Russell T, Eckardt MA, et al. Effective molecular targeting of CDK4/6 and IGF-1R in a rare FUS-ERG fusion CDKN2A-deletion doxorubicin-resistant Ewing’s sarcoma in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude-mouse model. Oncotarget. 2016;7:47556–47564. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Zhang N, Uehara F, Maawy A, Murakami T, Mii S, Yamamoto M, Miwa S, Yano S, Momiyama M, Mori R, Matsuyama R, et al. Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model of soft-tissue sarcoma more closely mimics the patient behavior in contrast to the subcutaneous ectopic model. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:697–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yamamoto M, Zhao M, Hiroshima Y, Zhang Y, Shurell E. Eilber F, C, Bouvet M, Noda M, Hoffman RM. Efficacy of tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on a melanoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude-mouse model. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kawaguchi K, Murakami T, Chmielowski B, Igarashi K, Kiyuna T, Unno M, Nelson SD, Russell TA, Dry SM, Li Y, Eilber FC, Hoffman RM. Vemurafenib-resistant BRAF-V600E mutated melanoma is regressed by MEK targeting drug trametinib, but not cobimetinib in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model. Oncotarget. 2016;7:71737–71743. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kawaguchi K, Igarashi K, Murakami T, Chmiewloski B, Kiyuna T, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Singh A, Unno M, Nelson SD, Russell T, Dry SM, Li Y, et al. Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R combined with Temozolomide regresses malignant melanoma with a BRAF-V600 mutation in a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. Oncotarget. 2016;7:85929–85936. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Blagosklonny MV. Matching targets for selective cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:1104–1107. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02806-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Blagosklonny MV. Teratogens as anti-cancer drugs. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1518–1521. doi: 10.4161/cc.4.11.2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Blagosklonny MV. Treatment with inhibitors of caspases, that are substrates of drug transporters, selectively permits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in multidrug-resistant cells but protects normal cells. Leukemia. 2001;15:936–941. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Blagosklonny MV. Target for cancer therapy: proliferating cells or stem cells. Leukemia. 2006;20:385–391. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Apontes P, Leontieva OV, Demidenko ZN, Li F, Blagosklonny MV. Exploring long-term protection of normal human fibroblasts and epithelial cells from chemotherapy in cell culture. Oncotarget. 2011;2:222–233. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Blagosklonny MV. Tissue-selective therapy of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1147–1151. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kawaguchi K, Igarashi K, Murakami T, Kiyuna T, Lwin T, Hwang HK, DeLong J, Clary B, Bouvet M, Unno M, Hoffman RM. MEK inhibitors cobimetinib and trametinib, regressed a gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) Oncotarget. 2017;8:47490–47496. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES