Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;8(37):62358–62370. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18140

Table 1. Study features of 11 included studies.

Reference Study type Location Study period Age range Case (participation)/control (participation) Type of source Assessment of measures
Nordstrom 1997 [27] Case-control Sweden 1987-1992 --- 121(--)/484(--) National population registry Mailed questionnaire; telephone interview
Hughes 2004 [28] Case-control Australia 2000-2001 20-74 704(85%)/694(61%) Electoral rolls Self-administered questionnaire; telephone interview
Smedby 2005 [29] Case-control Denmark and Sweden 1999-2002 18-74 3055(81%)/3187(71%) Population Telephone interview
Morales 2006 [37] Case-control Europe 1995-1997 35-69 76(91.6%)/2094(--) Population registries or electoral rolls Face-to-face interview
Tavani 2006 [30] Case-control Northern Italy 1985-1997 18-79 446(>97%)/1295(>97%) Patients hospitalized with other conditions Personal interview
Karipidis 2007 [31] Case-control Australia 2000-2001 20-74 694(85%)/694(61%) Population, electoral rolls Self-administered questionnaire; telephone interview
Weihkopf 2007 [32] Case-control Germany 18-80 589(87.4%)/589(51.4%) Population registers Face-to-face interview
Zhang 2007 [33] Case-control USA 1996-2000 21-84 601(72%)/706(--) Population In person interview
Boffetta 2008 [34] Case-control Europe 1998-2003 >17 1518(88%)/2124(81% in hospital controls, 52% in population controls) Population registers; Patients hospitalized with other conditions In person interview
Wong 2012 [35] Case-control Singapore 2004-2008 >18 541(--)/830(--) Patients hospitalized with other conditions Face-to-face interview
Reference Study type Location Follow-up years Case/cohort Cohort source Assessment of measures
Hakansson 2001 [36] Cohort Sweden 1971-1993 484/323860 Nationwide occupational health service program of the Swedish construction industry Used data files from nationwide occupational health service organization