Abstract
Over the past half a century, the structure and configuration of the rotenoids, a group of natural products showing multiple promising bioactivities, have been established by interpretation of their NMR and electronic circular dichroism spectra and confirmed by analysis of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. The chemical shift of the H-6' 1H NMR resonance has been found to be an indicator of either a cis or trans C/D ring system. In the present study, four structures representing the central rings of a cis-, a trans-, a dehydro-, and an oxadehydro-rotenoid have been plotted using the Mercury program based on X-ray crystal structures reported previously, with the conformations of the C/D ring system, the local bond lengths or interatomic distances, hydrogen bond angles, and the H-6' chemical shift of these compounds presented. It is shown for the first time that a trans-fused C/D ring system of rotenoids is preferred for the formation of a potential intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond, and that such H-bonding results in the 1H NMR resonance for H-6' being shifted downfield.
Keywords: Millettia caerulea, Fabaceae, rotenoids, intramolecular CAr–H•••O=C H-bond, NMR spectra and electronic effects, Conformation and configuration
Introduction
Rotenoid natural products, occurring mainly in species of the plant family Fabaceae, are the major active components of several botanical insecticides, miticides, and piscicides, including derris (the dried roots of Derris elliptica Benth.), cubé (the dried roots of Lonchocarpus utilis A. C. Smith), timbo (Lonchocarpus urucu Killip & A. C. Smith.), and barbasco (Lonchocarpus urucu Killip & A. C. Smith) [1]. These natural products have been characterized as a group of biogenetically advanced isoflavonoids [2, 3], with rotenone being a primary member that occurs in dried derris roots at concentration levels up to 12–15% [1]. Other predominant representatives are deguelin and tephrosin, of which tephrosin has been proposed as being an oxidized product of deguelin [1], a compound synthesized from rotenone and tephrosin [4, 5].
Over the past 100 years, rotenoids have been used as insecticides or piscicides to contribute to global farming [1], owing to their inhibitory activity against reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH):ubiquinone oxidoreductase (Complex I) [6, 7]. Beyond this property, rotenoids have shown antibacterial (against Helicobacter pylori) [8], antitumor [9], antiinflammatory [10], and antileishmanial and antimalarial activities [11, 12]. The antitumor propensity of rotenoids, which was reported to correlate with their Complex I inhibitory effects, has attracted an increasing interest [13–15]. In our previous work, (−)-rotenone and its analogues and (−)-tephrosin were found to exhibit cytotoxicity toward a small panel of human cancer cell lines [16–19], with similar effects observed for deguelin and 13-homo-13-oxa-2,3-dehydrodeguelin by other groups [20, 21]. Interestingly, deguelin was found to show in vivo cancer chemopreventive and antitumor effects [22, 23]. Tumor growth was inhibited, when thirty six-week-old male athymic BALB/c nu/nu mice bearing H460 human lung tumor xenografts were treated with deguelin (1 or 4 mg/kg, once every three days for 30 days) [23].
Their potent and promising bioactivities have triggered a wide interest in the search of new rotenoid analogues [24], and the need for their correct structural determinations has proved to be critically important for the further development of these agents. The structure of the parent compound, rotenone, has been ascertained by investigation of its NMR spectroscopic data [25, 26] and confirmed by X-ray crystallography [27], with its (2S, 3S, 2″R) absolute configuration established by a series of chemical reactions [28] and confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis for 5'-bromorotenone [29]. The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of rotenone and several analogues have been investigated, with the Cotton effects (CEs) characterized [19, 30]. Although the CEs above 300 nm were not suggested as reliable configurational assignments for some 3-substituted rotenoids [31], it has been well documented that these CEs are suitable for indicating the absolute configuration at C-2 and C-3 of 3-hydroxyrotenoids [19, 32].
Two different fusions, the thermodynamically favored cis-fused and the unfavored trans-fused C/D ring systems, occur in rotenoids [32], and a trans-C/D ring may be changed to its cis form by chemical synthesis [33]. It has been proved challenging on occasion to identify these different fusion modes, owing to the overlapped NMR resonances observed for their H-2 and H-3 protons and any methoxy groups present. Fortunately, the chemical shift value for H-6' of rotenoids was found to be strongly deshielded for a trans-C/D ring junction, when compared with this resonance for rotenoids containing a cis-C/D ring system [32, 33]. Accordingly, this value has been utilized as an effective indicator of the C/D fusion mode for rotenoids. Previous explanations for these observations have focused mainly on conformational and anisotropic effects from the C/D ring system [25, 26, 33]. In the present study, an alternative rationale for the H-6' chemical shift in serving as an indicator of the relative configuration of rotenoids has been presented, with an intramolecular CAr–H•••O=C hydrogen bond between H-6' and oxygen of the C-4 carbonyl group (C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bonding) being conjectured.
Results and Discussion
Based on their structural characteristics, naturally occurring rotenoids can be classified into six major sub-groups, comprising cis-rotenoids (with a cis-fused C/D ring), trans-rotenoids (with a trans-fused C/D ring), 2,3-di-epi-cis-rotenoids (with a reversal of the C-2 and C-3 positions when compared with the cis-rotenoids), dehydrorotenoids (with a 2,3-double bond), oxarotenoids (with an additional oxygen inserted between C-3 and C-1' of a cis- or a trans-rotenoid), and oxadehydrorotenoids (with an additional oxygen inserted between C-3 and C-1' of a dehydrorotenoid) (Fig. 1). In turn, most of these sub-groups of rotenoids can be divided further into two groups, “rotenone-like” rotenoids, containing a C-7 furan-fused 2-methyl-3-O-1-buten-4-yl unit, and “deguelin-like” rotenoids, incorporating a C-7 pyran-fused 3-methyl-3-O-1-buten-1-yl unit, respectively [19] (Fig. S1, Supporting Information). The “deguelin-like” rotenoids might be derived from “rotenone-like” rotenoids, as evidenced by successful synthesis of deguelin from rotenone and tephrosin [4, 5] (Fig. S1, Supporting Information) and the co-occurrence of both types of rotenoids in some plant species [13–19].
Fig. 1.
Structures of the rotoxen, isoflavonoid, and rotenoid skeletons.
Rotenoids have been postulated as being a group of biogenetically advanced isoflavonoids, with an additional ring D formed between C-2 and the C-2' methoxy group, as evidenced by biosynthesis of a rotenoid from an isoflavonoid precursor in plants and the chemical synthesis of (±)-[11-3H]-7-demethylmunduserone from 7,2'-dihydroxy-4',5'-dimethoxyisoflavone (Fig. S2, Supporting Information) [2, 3]. Such a hypothesis was also supported by the co-occurrence of rotenoids and isoflavonoids in some plants [19, 20]. Following their biogenetic origin, rotenoids can be numbered structurally following the same system as that used for isoflavonoids but different from the rotoxenoids (Fig. 1).
The bent structure of rotenone with a (2S, 3S, 2″R) absolute configuration has been determined unequivocally by analysis of its single-crystal X-ray diffraction data [27, 29], and its ECD spectrum showing the pronounced negative CEs around 209 and 276 nm and a positive CE at 237 nm, along with relatively weak negative CE around 307 nm and positive CEs at 333 and 352 nm, has been reported (Fig. S3, Supporting Information) [19, 30]. These ECD characteristics have been proved useful in a determination of the absolute configuration of other “rotenone-like” rotenoids, and, as mentioned above, the CEs above 300 nm have been suggested as a reliable reference to indicate the absolute configuration at C-2 and C-3 of 3-hydroxyrotenoids [19, 32], as exemplified by the ECD spectra of (+)-3-hydroxy-α-toxicarol and (−)-caeruleanone D (Fig. S4, Supporting Information) [19].
Both cis- and trans-rotenoids have been characterized from higher plants, and the structures of some representatives have been confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis [11, 15, 33]. Identification of the cis- or trans-fused C/D ring system is critically important in determining the absolute configuration of rotenoids, but overlapped NMR resonances for H-2, H-3, and any methoxy groups present may make this challenging. The 1H NMR chemical shift value for H-6' of cis-rotenoids (in the range δ 6.0–7.1) and for this same proton of trans-rotenoids (δ 7.5–8.5) has been proved sufficiently diagnostic, and the rationale for this has been proposed as resulting from the anisotropic effects of the C-4 carbonyl group and the conformational effects of the C/D ring system, based on analysis of Dreiding molecular models and the NMR spectroscopic data of various rotenoids [25, 26, 33].
To evaluate the conformational effects from the C/D ring system, plots showing the conformation of the central ring system of (−)-(2R,3R,1"R,2"S)-1",2"-dihydro-1",2"-dihydroxytephrosin (1, a cis-rotenoid) and (+)-usararotenoid A (2, a trans-rotenoid) have been generated in the present work (Fig. 2). These were based on their reported X-ray crystal structures [11, 15], using a crystal structure visualization program, Mercury version 3.8 [34], with the X-ray coordinates obtained from CIF files deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database [35]. As shown in Fig. 2, the conformation of the C/D ring system of 1 was found to be obviously different from that of 2, as supported by the different “torsion angles” for H5–C5•••C4–O4, C2'–C1'•••C4–O4, and H6'–C6'•••C4–O4 of both compounds. These “torsion angles” were found to be −2.4°, 168.4°, and −3.5°, respectively, for 1, and −20.3°, −129.1°, and 46.2°, respectively, for 2 (Table 1). The cis-C/D ring system in 1 was bent in a “roof-tile”-like shape, but the trans-fused C/D ring in 2 was geometrically more planar than that cis-fused in 1 (Fig. 2). The similarity of these conformations has been observed in the molecular modeling of all (−)-rotenone and its epimers, (−)-deguelin and its epimers, (−)-tephrosin and its epimers, (2R,3R,1"R,2"S)-1",2"-dihydro-1",2"-dihydroxytephrosin and its epimers, and (+)-usararotenoid A and its epimers (Figs. S5–S9, Supporting Information).
Fig. 2.
Structures of (−)-(2R,3R,1"R,2"S)-1",2"-dihydro-1",2"-dihydroxytephrosin (1) [(A)] and (+)-usararotenoid A (2) [(C)] and their partial crystal structures showing the conformation of the central ring system [(B) and (D)], which were generated by Mercury, version 3.8 [34], and based on reported X-ray crystallographic data [11, 15]. Chemical shift (δ) values were measured in CDCl3 for 1 [15] and in C5D5N for 2 [33], with the interatomic distances expressed in angstroms. A potential intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond may be formed in a trans rotenoid (2), which showed a planar-like conformation, but not in a cis rotenoid (1), which has a bent structure conformation.
Table 1.
“Torsion angles” of compounds 1 and 2a.
| Compound | H5–C5•••C4–O4 | C2'–C1'•••C4–O4 | H6'–C6'•••C4–O4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −2.4 | 168.4 | −3.5 |
| 2 | −20.3 | −129.1 | 46.2 |
“Torsion angles” expressed in degrees refers the angles between two bonds bonded to a third atom or bond.
To test the shielding effects from the C-4 carbonyl group, the interatomic distance between C-6' and oxygen of the C-4 carbonyl group (C6'•••O4) of 1 and 2 has been calculated, using the same Mercury program as mentioned above [34]. The value (3.169 Å) of 1 was found to be longer than that (2.940 Å) of 2 (Table 2). The chemical shift for H-6' of compounds 1 (δ 6.53 measured from CDCl3) [15] and 2 (δ 8.22 measured from C5D5N) [33] (Fig. 2), along with the same tendency of a more downfield signal for H-6' of trans-rotenoids than that of cis-rotenoids observed in the different deuterated solvents employed [33], indicated that the H-6' proton of trans-rotenoids is more deshielded than that of cis-rotenoids. Consistent with this observation, chemical shift values for H-6' of (−)-13-homo-13-oxa-2,3-dehydrorotenone (3) (δ 6.84) and of (−)-2,3-dehydrorotenone (δ 8.46) were reported in our previous study [19]. Inspection of the 1H NMR spectroscopic data of 3 and (−)-2,3-dehydrorotenone showed that an obviously different NMR resonance was observed only for the H-6' proton, with that for other protons found to be closely similar [19]. This indicates that an intramolecular H-bond between H-6' and the C-4 carbonyl group and not an anisotropic effect from the C-4 carbonyl group affects greatly the H-6' 1H NMR resonance of certain rotenoids.
Table 2.
Selected bond lengths, interatomic distances, and hydrogen bond angles for compounds 1–4.
| Compound | C4–O4a | C6'•••O4b | C6'–H6'•••O4c |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.235 | 3.169 | 118.8 |
| 2 | 1.216 | 2.940 | 107.6 |
| 3 | 1.235 | 4.405 | 108.9 |
| 4 | 1.269 | 2.881 | 124.5 |
Bond lengths expressed in angstroms (Å);
Interatomic distances expressed in angstroms (Å);
Hydrogen bond angles expressed in degrees.
To test this hypothesis, plots showing the conformation of the C/D ring system of (−)-13-homo-13-oxa-2,3-dehydrorotenone (3, an oxadehydrorotenoid) and 2,3-dehydrosermundone (4, a dehydrorotenoid) were drawn (Fig. 3), based on their X-ray crystal structures reported previously [36, 37], using the same procedure as mentioned above for compounds 1 and 2. A similar conformation with an almost planar C/D ring system was found for both 3 and 4, but the C6'•••O4 and O4•••H6' interatomic distances (4.405 and 4.005 Å, respectively) observed for 3 were found to be much longer than those (2.881 and 2.250 Å, respectively) calculated for 4 (Table 2 and Fig. 3). In turn, different chemical shifts for H-6' of 3 (δ 6.94) [36] and 4 (δ 8.24) [38] have been reported. This evidence strongly supports the formation of a potential intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond. The conformation of the C/D ring series of 3 and 4 has also been confirmed by their molecular modeling (Figs. S10 and S11, Supporting Information).
Fig. 3.
Structures of (−)-13-homo-13-oxa-2,3-dehydrorotenone (3) [(A)] and 2,3-dehydrosermundone (4) [(C)] and their partial crystal structures showing the conformation of the central ring system [(B) and (D)], which were generated by Mercury, version 3.8 [34], and based on reported X-ray crystallographic data [36, 37]. Chemical shift (δ) values were measured in CHCl3 for both compounds [36, 38], with the interatomic distances expressed in angstroms. A potential intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond may be formed in 4 but not in 3, owing to a “short” (2.250 Å) H6'•••O interatomic distance in 4, which is possible for the formation of an intramolecular H-bond.
Conformational effects on the NMR resonances observed for rotenoid compounds have been discussed [39], but an intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond has not been assumed for such an issue by any previous studies. The existence of non-classical C–H•••O H-bonds was confirmed by analysis of the total charge density method [40], and an intramolecular N–H•••O=C H-bond between the H atom of a cis thioamide and a carbonyl oxygen atom has been supported by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, with a trans–cis geometry of the almost planar thiourea unit found stabilized by this H-bonding [41]. Recently, an intramolecular CAr–H•••O=C H-bond has been reported, based on X-ray diffraction data [42], and the chemical shift of an intramolecular “non-classical” H-bonding C–H proton was found shifted downfield about 1 ppm [43]. This downfield chemical shift has been proposed as a potential means of evaluating the H-bond, and the “short” C•••O (<3.3 Å) and O•••H (<2.6 Å) interatomic distance and the favored orientation have been evidenced as consequence of such H-bonding [43].
A planar-like C/D ring system was shown in the trans-rotenoid 2 (Fig. 2), which provided a potential pseudo six-membered ring over the bonds O4–C4–C3–C1'–C6'–H6'•••O4, as indicated by a hydrogen bond angle 107.6° for C6'–H6'•••O4 (>90°) [42]. This conformation and the pseudo six-membered ring would be favored for an intramolecular CAr–H•••O=C H-bond between H-6' and O-4, as indicated by the “short” C6'•••O4 [2.940 Å (<3.3 Å)] and O4•••H6' [2.492 Å (<2.6 Å)] interatomic distances (Fig. 2 and Table 2) [43]. Such an intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond would lead to a strongly deshielded 1H NMR resonance at δ 8.22 for H-6' of 2 [33], when compared with that at δ 6.53 for the same proton of 1 [15]. However, the planar-like conformation of the C/D ring system is not apparent in the cis-rotenoid 1, and the non-planar C/D ring system is unfavored for the formation of an intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond, as implied by its “long” C6'•••O4 (3.169 Å) and O4•••H6' (2.601 Å) interatomic distances (longer than those of 2) (Fig. 2 and Table 2) [43].
Such a proposed intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond is supported by the plots drawn for compounds 3 and 4. As shown in Fig. 3, although a planar-like C/D ring system is evidenced for 3 and 4, the “long” C6'•••O4 [4.405 Å (>3.3 Å)] and O4•••H6' [4.242 Å (>2.6 Å)] [43] interatomic distances observed in 3 prohibit the formation of intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond. Thus, a normal aromatic 1H NMR resonance at δ 6.93 for H-6' is observed for 3 [36]. Differentially, the “short” C6'•••O4 [2.881 Å (<3.3 Å)] and O4•••H6' [2.250 Å (<2.6 Å)] [43] interatomic distances of 4 supported an intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bond, as indicated by the downfield signal at δ 8.24 for H-6' of 4 (Fig. 3) [38].
As summarized in Fig. S12 (Supporting Information), the downfield signal observed for the 1H NMR resonance for H-6' of trans-rotenoids is not influenced by the choice of solvents used, as supported by the data measured in the same or different deuterated solvents for several rotenoids and their epimers [15, 18, 19, 33, 36, 44, 45]. Comparison of the 1H NMR chemical shift values for H-5, H-6, H-3', and H-6' or other protons of 3 and (−)-2,3-dehydrorotenone showed that no obvious changes were observed for any protons other than H-6', and a similar observation was evidenced in other rotenoids (Fig. S12, Supporting Information) [15, 18, 19, 33, 36, 44, 45]. This indicates that an anisotropic effect from the C-4 carbonyl group is not a major contributor to the downfield signal for the 1H NMR resonance for H-6' of trans-rotenoids.
Recently, an intramolecular H-bond between the hydroxy group at C-5 (OH-5) and the C-4 carbonyl group (C4=O) of flavonoids and isoflavonoids has been reported, as indicated by a downfield signal around δ 12.5 for OH-5, when compared with those observed in the range δ 5.0–10.0 assigned for other aromatic hydroxy groups [46]. Also, a non-classical intramolecular CAr–H•••O=C H-bond has been demonstrated for some (diaryl)tetrahydrofuranones by their X-ray diffraction data [42]. Inspection of the partial structural units of C5-O-H•••O=C4 of flavonoids, isoflavonoids, or rotenoids and that for the H-bond of (diaryl)tetrahydrofuranones shows that these structural units are closely comparable, indicating a potential intramolecular C5–H5•••O=C4 H-bond for rotenoids and another C6'–H6'•••O=C4 H-bonds for trans-rotenoids. Such an assumption has been supported by the O4•••H6' interatomic distances, C6'-H6'•••O4 hydrogen bond angles, and the chemical shift values for H-5 and H-6′ 1H NMR resonances of trans-rotenoids (Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 3 and Fig. S12, Supporting Information), which are consistent with those calculated for other H-bonds [42, 43, 47].
The observations summarized herein are a consequence of the different conformations that occur in cis- and trans-rotenoids. The conformation of the trans-rotenoids is favored for the formation of an intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 bent H-bond, which leads a strongly deshielded 1H NMR resonance around δ 8.0 for their H-6' proton, with this resonance value used to differentiate the trans-rotenoids from their cis isomers.
Rotenoid natural products contain diverse structures and show multiple promising bioactivities. The correct determination of the conformation and configuration of these natural products plays a vital role for the further development of these compounds. The 1H NMR chemical shift of H-6' occurring in an unsubstituted manner in natural rotenoids has been used to indicate the presence of a cis- or a trans-rotenoid, and this is proposed to be due to an intramolecular C6'–H6'•••O=C4 bent H-bond. Moreover, this type of configuration determination involving intramolecular H-bond formation may be evident in other natural product structural classes.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and extraction and isolation
A fruit sample of Millettia caerulea (Graham) Baker (Fabaceae-Papilionoideae) was collected in Vietnam, as reported in our previous publication [19]. The rotenoids (−)-rotenone, (+)-3-hydroxy-α-toxicarol, and (−)-caeruleanone D were isolated from a methanol extract of the milled air-dried fruits of M. caerulea and determined structurally by analysis of their spectroscopic data [19].
Plots of crystal structure
The plots of various X-ray structures were drawn using the Mercury program, version 3.8, of the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC, Cambridge) [34], with bond lengths and angles and torsion angles calculated with this same program. The X-ray coordinates were obtained from the CIF files deposited in the Cambridge Structural Database CSD) [35].
3D Structural modeling
The 3D structural modeling showing the conformation of the central ring system of rotenoids was obtained using the PerkinElmer ChemBio3D Ultra 14.0 suites, with the stick mode displayed and molecule translated and rotated.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This investigation was supported by grant P01 CA125066 funded by the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD. The plant sample of Millettia caerulea was collected under a collaborative arrangement between the University of Illinois at Chicago, USA, and the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources of the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam. We thank Prof. Djaja D. Soejarto of the Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago and Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, for acquisition of the plant sample of Millettia caerulea. We thank Prof. David J. Hart, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, for helpful discussions about intramolecular H–bonds.
Footnotes
Structures of rotenone, deguelin, and tephrosin and synthesis of deguelin; synthesis of [11-3H]-7-demethylmunduserone from 7,2'-di-hydroxy-4',5'-di-methoxyisoflavone; chemical and crystal structures and ECD spectrum of (−)-rotenone; structures of (+)-3-hydroxy-α-toxicarol and (−)-caeruleanone D and their ECD spectra; structures and molecular models of (−)-rotenone, (−)-deguelin, (−)-tephrosin, (2R,3R,1"R,2"S)-1",2"-dihydro-1",2"-dihydroxytephrosin, and (+)-usararotenoid A, and their epimers; structures and molecular models of (−)-13-homo-13-oxa-2,3-dehydrorotenone and 2,3-dehydrosermundone; structures and selected δ values for several cis-rotenoids and their trans isomers.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- 1.Roark RC. Present status of rotenone and rotenoids. J Econ Entomol. 1941;34:684–691. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crombie L. Rotenoids and their biosynthesis. Nat Prod Rep. 1984;1:3–19. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crombie L, Whiting DA. Biosynthesis in the rotenoid group of natural products: Applications of isotope methodology. Phytochemistry. 1998;49:1479–1507. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Garcia J, Barluenga S, Beebe K, Neckers L, Winssinger N. Concise modular asymmetric synthesis of deguelin, tephrosin and investigation into their mode of action. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:9767–9771. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chang D-J, An H, Kim K, Kim HH, Jung J, Lee JM, Kim N-J, Han YT, Yun H, Lee S, Lee G, Lee S, Lee JS, Cha JH, Park J-H, Park JW, Lee S-C, Kim SG, Kim JH, Lee H-Y, Kim K-W, Suh Y-G. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel deguelin-based heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors targeting proliferation and angiogenesis. J Med Chem. 2012;55:10863–10884. doi: 10.1021/jm301488q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamamoto I. Mode of action of pyrethroids, nicotinoids, and rotenoids. Ann Rev Entomol. 1970;15:257–272. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hollingworth RM, Ahammadsahib KI. Inhibitors of respiratory complex I: mechanisms, pesticidal actions and toxicology. Rev Pestic Toxicol. 1995;3:277–302. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takashima J, Chiba N, Yoneda K, Ohsaki A. Derrisin, a new rotenoid from Derris malaccensis Plain and anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of its related constituents. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:611–613. doi: 10.1021/np010126p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fang N, Casida JE. Anticancer action of cubé insecticide: Correlation for rotenoid constituents between inhibition of NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase and induced ornithine decarboxylase activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:3380–3384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bairwa K, Jachak SM. Anti-inflammatory potential of a lipid-based formulation of a rotenoid-rich fraction prepared from Boerhavia diffusa. Pharm Biol. 2015;53:1231–1238. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2014.971382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yenesew A, Derese S, Midiwo JO, Oketch-Rabah HA, Lisgarten J, Palmer R, Heydenreich M, Peter MG, Akala H, Wangui J, Liyala P, Waters NC. Anti-plasmodial activities and X-ray crystal structures of rotenoids from Millettia usaramensis subspecies usaramensis. Phytochemistry. 2003;64:773–779. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(03)00373-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Upegui Y, Gil JF, Quiñones W, Torres F, Escobar G, Robledo SM, Echeverri F. Preparation of rotenone derivatives and in vitro analysis of their antimalarial, antileishmanial and selective cytotoxic activities. Molecules. 2014;19:18911–18922. doi: 10.3390/molecules191118911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fang N, Rowlands JC, Casida JE. Anomalous structure-activity relationships of 13-homo-13-oxarotenoids and 13-homo-13-oxadehydrorotenoids. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10:853–858. doi: 10.1021/tx9700432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rowlands JC, Casida JE. NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase inhibitors block induction of ornithine decarboxylase activity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;83:214–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1998.tb01471.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fang N, Casida JE. Cubé resin insecticide: Identification and biological activity of 29 rotenoid constituents. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:2130–2136. doi: 10.1021/jf981188x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blatt CTT, Chávez D, Chai HB, Graham JG, Cabieses F, Farnsworth NR, Cordell GA, Pezzuto JM, Kinghorn AD. Cytotoxic flavonoids from the stem bark of Lonchocarpus aff. fluvialis. Phytother Res. 2002;16:320–325. doi: 10.1002/ptr.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bueno Pérez L, Li J, Lantvit DD, Pan L, Ninh TN, Chai HB, Soejarto DD, Swanson SM, Lucas DM, Kinghorn AD. Bioactive constituents of Indigofera spicata. J Nat Prod. 2013;76:1498–1504. doi: 10.1021/np400567c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bueno Pérez L, Pan L, Muñoz Acuña U, Li J, Chai HB, Gallucci JC, Ninh TN, Carcache de Blanco EJ, Soejarto DD, Kinghorn AD. Caeruleanone A, a rotenoid with a new arrangement of the D-ring from the fruits of Millettia caerulea. Org Lett. 2014;16:1462–1465. doi: 10.1021/ol500266z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ren Y, Benatrehina PA, Muñoz Acuña U, Yuan C, Chai HB, Ninh TN, Carcache de Blanco EJ, Soejarto DD, Kinghorn AD. Isolation of bioactive rotenoids and isoflavonoids from the fruits of Millettia caerulea. Planta Med. 2016;82:1096–1104. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ye H, Fu A, Wu W, Li Y, Wang G, Tang M, Li S, He S, Zhong S, Lai H, Yang J, Xiang M, Peng A, Chen L. Cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of constituents from Millettia pachycarpa Benth. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:1402–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baba Y, Fujii M, Maeda T, Suzuki A, Yuzawa S, Kato Y. Deguelin induces apoptosis by targeting both EGFR-Akt and IGF1R-Akt pathways in head and neck squamous cell cancer cell lines. Bio Med Res Int. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/657179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Udeani GO, Gerhäuser C, Thomas CF, Moon RC, Kosmeder JW, Kinghorn AD, Moriarty RM, Pezzuto JM. Cancer chemopreventive activity mediated by deguelin, a naturally occurring rotenoid. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3424–3428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hsu YC, Chiang JH, Yu CS, Hsia TC, Wu RSC, Lien JC, Lai KC, Yu FS, Chung JG. Antitumor effects of deguelin on H460 human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo: Roles of apoptotic cell death and H460 tumor xenografts model. Environ Toxicol. 2017;32:84–98. doi: 10.1002/tox.22214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Parente JP, Pereira da Silva B. Naturally occurring rotenoids (1982–1999) Recent Res Dev Phytochem. 2001;5:153–167. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Crombie L, Lown JW. Proton magnetic studies of rotenone and related compounds. J Chem Soc. 1962;1962:775–781. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abidi SL, Abidi MS. 13C NMR spectral characterization of epimeric rotenone and some related tetrahydrobenzopyranofurobenzopyranones. J Heterocyclic Chem. 1983;20:1687–1692. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang SP, Chen HM, Zhang F, Chen QQ, Yu XB, Huang JG, Xu HH. Rotenone-acetic acid (2/1) Acta Cryst. 2004;E60:o532–o534. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Büchi G, Crombie L, Godin PJ, Kaltenbronn JS, Siddalingaiah KS, Whiting DA. The absolute configuration of rotenone. J Chem Soc. 1961;1961:2843–2860. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Begley MJ, Crombie L, Whiting DA. Conformation and absolute configuration of rotenone: Examination of 8'-bromorotenone by X-ray methods. J Chem Soc Chem Commu. 1975;1975:850–851. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Verbit L, Clark-Lewis JW. Optically active aromatic chromophores–VIII. Studies in the isoflavanoid and rotenoid series. Tetrahedron. 1968;24:5519–5527. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kostova I, Berova N, Ivanov P, Mikhova B, Rakovska R. Stereochemical studies of some 12a-substituted rotenoid derivatives. Croatica Chem Acta. 1991;64:637–647. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Slade D, Ferreira D, Marais JPJ. Circular dichroism, a powerful tool for the assessment of absolute configuration of flavonoids. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:2177–2215. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yenesew A, Midiwo JO, Waterman PG. Rotenoids, isoflavones and chalcones from the stem bark of Millettia usaramensis subspecies usaramensis. Phytochemistry. 1998;47:295–300. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Macrae CF, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Shields GP, Taylor R, Towler M, van de Streek J. Mercury: Visualization and analysis of crystal structures. J Appl Cryst. 2006;39:453–457. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Groom CR, Bruno IJ, Lightfoot MP, Ward SC. The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Cryst. 2016;B72:171–179. doi: 10.1107/S2052520616003954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fang N, Casida JE. Novel bioactive cube insecticide constituents: Isolation and preparation of 13-homo-13-oxa-6a,12a-dehydrorotenoids. J Org Chem. 1997;62:350–353. doi: 10.1021/jo961604h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Teerawatananond T, Chaichit N, Muangsin N. Co-crystal structure of 11-hydroxy-2,3,9-trimethoxy-6H-chromeno[3,4-b]chromen-12-one and 11-hydroxy-2,3,9-trimethoxy-chromeno[3,4-b]chromene-6,12-dione. J Chem Crystallogr. 2010;40:591–596. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bai L, Jiang H, Kang T, Zhang H, Jiang Z, Zhao Z. Pharmacognostical evaluation of Arctii Fructus (5). Chemical constituents from fruits of Amorpha fruticosa. Nat Med. 2004;58:275–277. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Carlson DG, Weisleder D, Tallent WH. NMR investigations of rotenoids. Tetrahedron. 1973;29:2731–2741. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koch U, Popelier PLA. Characterization of C–H–O hydrogen bonds on the basis of the charge density. J Phys Chem. 1995;99:9747–9754. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cairo RR, Stevens AMP, de Oliveira TD, Batista AA, Castellano EE, Duque J, Soria DB, Fantoni AC, Corrêa RS, Erben MF. Understanding the conformational changes and molecular structure of furoyl thioureas upon substitution. Spectrochim Acta A: Mol Biomol Spect. 2017;176:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Semenok DV, Medvedev JJ, Avdontceva MS, Selivanov SI, Sieler J, Mereshchenko AS, Nikolaev VA. Experimental evidence of intramolecular CAr–H•••O=C hydrogen bonds in the structure of (diaryl)tetrahydrofuranones using spectroscopic tools. Helv Chim Acta. 2016;99:716–723. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ash EL, Sudmeier JL, Day RM, Vincent M, Torchilin EV, Haddad KC, Bradshaw EM, Sanford DG, Bachovchin WW. Unusual 1H NMR chemical shifts support (His) Cε1–H•••O=C H-bond: Proposal for reaction-driven ring flip mechanism in serine protease catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10371–10376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Begley MJ, Crombie L, Hadi HBA, Josephs JL. Synthesis of trans-B/C-rotenoids: X-ray and NMR data for cis- and trans-forms of isorotenone. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1. 1993:2605–2613. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Andrei CC, Vieira PC, Fernandes JB, da Silva MFDGF, Fo ER. Dimethylchromene rotenoids from Tephrosia candida. Phytochemistry. 1997;46:1081–1085. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Abraham MH, Acree WE, Earp CE, Vladimirova A, Whaley WL. Studies on the hydrogen bond acidity, and other descriptors and properties for hydroxyflavones and hydroxyisoflavones. J. Mol Liq. 2015;208:363–372. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Taylor R, Kennard O, Versichel W. The geometry of the N-H…O:C hydrogen bond. 3. Hydrogen-bond distances and angles. Acta Cryst. 1984;B40:280–288. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



