Skip to main content
BJPsych International logoLink to BJPsych International
. 2017 Feb 1;14(1):1–4. doi: 10.1192/s2056474000001550

Involving patients, carers and families: an international perspective on emerging priorities

Afzal Javed 1,, Helen Herrman 2,
PMCID: PMC5618820  PMID: 29093923

Abstract

This paper focuses on the importance of involving patients, families and other carers when offering and deciding on treatment and care options. It highlights the activities of international and national organisations in facilitating collaboration with patients and families in treatment, research, teaching and training related to mental healthcare.


The treatment and care of a person living with mental illness require a comprehensive and evidence-based approach that includes support for the active participation of that patient and their family. The relationship among different stakeholders in this equation – patients, families and practitioners – is, however, perceived differently by each. The patients and their families often experience limited opportunity to offer information and have little power to influence decisions. Families and carers may feel isolated if left alone or not involved in the treatment of their loved ones. Practitioners sometimes feel ill equipped or unsupported, or lack the time to undertake this work. However, it is widely accepted that in order to improve services and care it is necessary to acknowledge the personal experiences of patients and of their families and friends, and to seek their inclusion in the planning and organising of care.

Historical context

Perceptions of psychiatry and mental health among professionals and general communities have changed significantly during the past century. There is strong evidence, however, that stigma, discrimination and failure to respect the human rights and dignity of people living with mental illnesses continue to exist all over the world (Collins et al, 2011). Until recent decades, in most countries a uni-professional approach to mental healthcare was dominant. Psychiatrists and big institutions were entrusted with the job of looking after patients with conditions recognised as mental illness in a protected environment. However, since the middle of the 20th century many other professionals, including psychologists, nurses, general physicians, occupational therapists, social workers, accommodation and employment workers, and advocacy services have become equal partners in providing health and social care. Although these trends are more evident in high-income countries, such ideas are also becoming more acceptable in low- and middle-income countries.

Another significant change is the growing acknowledgement within current practice of the need to involve the patients living with mental illnesses in their own care and treatment, as well as their families. The importance of patient empowerment and participation and of their human rights is increasingly recognised all over the world (Dhanda & Narayan, 2007; Sunkel, 2011). There is ample evidence that working with carers and families is not only beneficial for short-term outcomes but may also lead to long-lasting improvements in the mental health, function and quality of life of those with mental disorders. The literature documents the importance of developing and sustaining partnerships with patients and carers (Crawford et al, 2002).

Families were kept away from the care of psychiatric patients during the institutional era. Little attention was paid to the family’s supporting and expert roles. The closure of the institutions that started in many countries during the second half of the 20th century, however, resulted in many individuals with mental illnesses returning to live with their families or elsewhere in the community. Since that time, families have been involved along with professionals in helping patients to ameliorate the impact of mental illness. A strong movement has brought families and carers on board (Campbell, 2009). There has also been a promising shift in understanding the influence of families. Families and carers are no longer held responsible for the onset of patients’ problems. Instead, the mental illness and associated problems are now seen as arising from a combination of factors.

Empowerment

There is a growing interest in the movements supporting empowerment of patients and families. Their involvement is becoming a guiding principle in the UK, the USA, Australia and other countries. These changes are taking place with an understanding based on evidence and experience: that the development of patient and family groups and their active involvement in healthcare systems lead to more accessible and acceptable services and improvements in the quality of life of patients and families. This has been advocated by the World Health Organization (2001) and evidence is accumulating from the work of patient and family and carer groups in different parts of the world (Katantoka, 2007; Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009; Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2014).

Problems associated with caring roles

Family carers, however, often experience physical, psychological, social and financial problems as a consequence of caring for a relative. Stress, depression, anxiety and frustrations are common in the periods of acute care and for some they may continue for many years. A study conducted in Sri Lanka by an organisation called Basic Needs (Table 1) has shown that stigma, discrimination, exclusion, ‘livelihood hardship’ (economic burden) and difficulties in getting access to adequate treatment and care are salient features of the problems expressed by carers (Basic Needs, 2013). Families receive little recognition for their valuable work, and most countries, including high-income countries, fail to offer financial support for the care services that families provide.

Table 1. Common problems experienced by carers: numbers and proportions of survey respondents mentioning specific problems.

No. of respondents Proportion of respondents
Stigma, discrimination and exclusion 71 33%
Livelihood hardship/economic burden 33 15%
Carers’ burden 29 13%
Problems related to the mental illness 29 13%
Family relationships 17   8%
Mental health service issues 16   7%
Lack of rehabilitation   9   4%

Findings from the study Organisation of Mental Health Service Users and Carers: A Mapping in Sri Lanka, conducted by Basic Needs 2012–13 (Basic Needs, 2013).

Despite the significant evidence of benefits, the involvement of patients and families in mental health services remains patchy. There are a number of barriers to useful initiatives. These include carers’ understanding of the illness and expectations of services. Conversely, the awareness, acceptance and acknowledgement from professionals and the competencies of many professional groups in dealing with these issues have also been noted as major barriers and are neglected in many places.

The work of national, regional and international organisations

Despite these limitations, a great deal of work has been accomplished by a number of national, regional and international organisations.

The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), the representative organisation of psychiatrists globally, has raised the profile of this aspect of care. During the 2008–11 triennium, the WPA appointed a task force that included service users and family carers and representatives from Europe, Africa and Asia to develop best practices for working with service users and carers. The task force provided a set of recommendations for the international mental health community and direction for the member societies of the WPA, for implementation in their respective countries (Wallcraft et al, 2011).

The World Association for Psychosocial Rehabilitation (WAPR), another organisation that works in the field of psychiatric rehabilitation, emphasises the roles of patients, carers and families in treatment and rehabilitation programmes worldwide (see http://www.wapr.org). The WAPR has established a standing task force that sets and reviews guidelines for future work in this area.

Several national and regional associations have taken a lead in giving importance to the work of patients and carers, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the UK and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Royal College of Psychiatrists regularly invites local carers’ and users’ groups to contribute to the training programmes for psychiatrists. This strategy has increased the knowledge, awareness and responsiveness of the trainee psychiatrists at their workplaces. The College has also taken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Princess Royal Trust for Carers, including an approach known as the ‘triangle of care’ developed by carers and the professionals to improve carers’ engagement in treatment services. The guidelines supporting this approach outline key elements in achieving the partnership and give examples of good practice (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009); and they are supported by work from other organisations. The RANZCP has a Consumer and Care Committee that participates in governance of the College, including appointing service users and carers as members of the College Board. The RANZCP has developed guidelines for inclusive policy and practice (Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2014).

The World Health Organization’s (2013) Mental Health Action Plan 2013–20 was approved by all member states at the World Health Assembly in May 2013. It calls for more active involvement and support of service users in the reorganisation, delivery, evaluation and monitoring of services so that care and treatment become more responsive to their needs. The Plan also calls for greater collaboration with families and other ‘informal’ mental healthcare providers, such as religious leaders, faith healers, traditional healers, schoolteachers, police officers and local non-governmental organisations. The World Health Organization urges member states to:

Integrate and coordinate holistic prevention, promotion, rehabilitation, care and support that aims at meeting both mental and physical health care needs and facilitates the recovery of persons of all ages with mental disorders within and across general health and social services (including the promotion of the right to employment, housing, and education) through service user-driven treatment and recovery plans and, where appropriate, with the inputs of families and carers. (World Health Organization, 2013, p. 15)

The Plan urges the World Health Organization to:

Collate and disseminate evidence and best practices for the integration and multisectoral coordination of holistic care, emphasizing recovery and support needs for persons with mental disorders, including alternatives to coercive practices and strategies to engage service users, families and carers in service planning and treatment decisions. (World Health Organization, 2013, p. 16)

Several illustrative strategies for implementing the World Health Organization’s Plan involve service users and carers. The leaders of treatment and care services should engage and collaborate with people with mental disorders, carers and family members, and should advocate effectively for increased resource allocation and the development and implementation of policies, laws and services relating to mental health. This is likely to mean formalised structures and mechanisms and may require the building of capacity and awareness among local groups about mental health, law and human rights, and their responsibilities in relation to these. Alongside this is the need for the empowerment of people with mental disorders and related disabilities and their organisations, and ensuring they have a formal role and authority to influence the design, planning and implementation of policies, laws and services.

Providing logistic, technical and financial support to organisations at local, national and international levels, and involving people with mental disorders and their families in the training of health workers, as peer support workers and in the inspection and monitoring of mental health services are all cited in the Plan as strategies to be considered.

Conclusions

Mental health problems lead to personal, family, social and economic adversities. The roles and responsibilities of professionals, patients, families and carers in responding to these problems through treatment and care, teaching, research and policy-making need to be acknowledged and respected in a more noticeable way. The policies that shape the responses should be based on social inclusion and the participation of patients, professionals and families, and should place emphasis on the rights of people with mental illness, as well as on fairness, equality and justice. The experience of caring for a family member with mental ill health may bring rewards, but it is also known across countries and cultures to increase the suffering of family members and to heighten their risk of a number of physical, psychological, social and financial problems. These results have led to a call for action at national and international levels to reduce the adverse effects on the families as well as those with lived experience of illness (Gonzalez et al, 2011; World Health Organization, 2013).

Research and future work need to focus on supporting the resilience of patients and families, and on examining their strengths and the factors that protect them. The long-term consequences of caregiving and the support, information and training essential to patients and families at various stages of an illness need to be understood in depth and appropriate empowerment and communication with services formalised. There is, equally, a strong need for mental health professionals to make a thorough assessment of patient and family members’ strengths as well as their limitations. Mental health professionals must develop a reliable understanding of the needs of patients for respect, dignity and support during treatment and recovery. They need an equally good understanding of the resources that families have and do not have to support and live successfully with those who are mentally ill.

The continuing support of mental health professionals and policy makers and their positive attitudes towards patient and family participation in turn can give critical support to innovative programmes for patient, family and carer empowerment. Including patients and families as active members of healthcare teams and using their experiences by involving them as trainers and researchers can improve services as well as add support and ease their burdens (Simpson et al, 2002).

References

  1. Basic Needs (2013) Organizations of Mental Health Service Users and Carers: A Mapping in Sri Lanka Conducted by Basic Needs 2012–13. Basic Needs. [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell, J. (2009) Methods. In Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research (eds Wallcraft J., Schrank B. & Amering M.), pp. 113–138. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins, P. Y., Patel, V., Joestl, S. S., et al. (2011) Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature, 475 (7354), 27–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., Manley, C., et al. (2002) Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ, 325, 1263–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dhanda, A. & Narayan, T. (2007) Mental health and human rights. Lancet, 370, 1198–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gonzalez, E. W., Polansky, M., Lippa, C. F., et al. (2011) Family caregivers at risk: who are they? Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 32, 528–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Katantoka, S. (2007) Users’ networks for Africans with mental disorders. Lancet, 370, 919–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (2014) Consumer, Family/Whānau and Carer Engagement, Position Statement 62. Available at https://www.ranzcp.org/Files/Resources/College_Statements/Position_Statements/PS-62-PPC-Consumer-and-Carer-Engagement.aspx (accessed January 2016).
  9. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2009) Mental Health and Social Inclusion, Position Statement PS01/2009 RCPsych. [Google Scholar]
  10. Simpson, E. L., House, A. O. & Barkham, M. (2002) A Guide to Involving Users, Ex-users and Carers in Mental Health Service Planning, Delivery or Research: A Health Technology Approach. Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sunkel, S. (2011) Empowerment and partnership in mental health. Lancet, 379, 201–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wallcraft, J., Amering, M., Freidin, J., et al. (2011) Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry, 10, 229–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. World Health Organization (2001) Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. World Health Report. WHO. [Google Scholar]
  14. World Health Organization (2013) Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020. WHO. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BJPsych International are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Psychiatrists

RESOURCES