Skip to main content
Dementia & Neuropsychologia logoLink to Dementia & Neuropsychologia
. 2010 Apr-Jun;4(2):86–90. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40200002

Cognitive impairment in clinically isolated syndrome: A systematic review

Prejuízo cognitivo na síndrome clínica isolada: uma revisão sistemática

Carolina Fiorin Anhoque 1, Simone Cristina Aires Domingues 2, Antônio Lúcio Teixeira 3, Renan Barros Domingues 4,
PMCID: PMC5619164  PMID: 29213668

Abstract

The pattern of cognitive abnormalities in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been extensively studied and well characterized. However, little is known about the cognitive involvement in patients with the clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Objectives

To perform a systematic review of the results of the studies on cognitive dysfunction in CIS patients.

Methods

Cochrane, Lilacs, PubMed/Medline and SciELO databases were searched for studies involving patients with clinically isolated syndrome submitted to neuropsychological evaluation.

Results

Seven studies fulfilled the selection criteria adopted in this review. The pattern of cognitive abnormalities in CIS resembles that found in patients with MS and is characterized by attention deficit, reduced information processing speed and impaired working memory and executive functions. The frequency of cognitive impairment in CIS seems to be lower than in MS.

Conclusions

Cognition should be evaluated in patients with CIS. Future studies are required to evaluate the impact of cognitive abnormalities and to correlate them with axonal damage findings in patients with CIS.

Keywords: cognition, cognitive impairment, clinically isolated syndrome, demyelinating disease


Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is defined as the first episode of a demyelinating and inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Several patients with CIS convert to multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic demyelinating disorder characterized by CNS lesions disseminated in time and space.1 The most frequent CIS presentation is optic neuritis (ON). Only 22% patients with CIS without lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) convert to MS while 56% of those with MRI lesions will develop MS.2 Therefore, the risk of conversion to MS increases in CIS patients with MRI lesions in the CNS.

In recent years, evaluation of patients with MS has taken into account only motor and visual disability. However, recent studies have demonstrated that emotional, social, psychological and cognitive aspects have a tremendous impact on the quality of life of such patients.3,4 Consequently, the study of cognitive function in MS has gained great importance. Cognitive dysfunction in MS is found in 40 to 65% of patients5 and seems to be related with the number and localization of the demyelinating plaques, axonal loss, and brain atrophy typically found in MS.6 Considering that these pathological elements are progressive, it is important to establish in which phase of the disease the cognitive abnormalities began. Along these lines, some studies have assessed cognitive functions in early MS and CIS.7-9

In the present study a systematic review of the literature was conducted on cognitive dysfunction in patients with CIS, taking into account the neuropsychological tests used in these studies, the evaluation of potentially confounding variables such as depression and fatigue, and correlation with neuroimaging.

Methods

The search strategy used the key words “clinically isolated syndrome”, “cognition”, and “cognitive impairment” to search the following database systems: Cochrane, Lilacs, Pubmed/Medline, and Scielo from January 1990 to December 2009.

Of the articles found, those which included patients with CIS characterized by the occurrence of a single attack of a clinical lesion suggestive of CNS demyelination and with MRI abnormalities, were selected. Articles that did not use a clear definition of ClS were excluded. Also, articles that did not present the cognitive assessment procedure were also excluded. The search was performed independently by three researchers.

A description of each study selected is first presented. Each study was analyzed according to the following pre-established parameters: study type, number of CIS patients included, inclusion of a control group, time between CIS and cognitive evaluation, percentage of CIS patients with cognitive impairment, main neuropsychological findings, correlation with imaging, and evaluation of psychiatric co-morbidities such as depression, anxiety, and fatigue.

Results

Seventeen references were found, three in the Cochrane Library and fourteen on Pubmed/Medline. The search in the other databases retrieved no articles. Ten of the articles found were excluded for not meeting the inclusion and/or exclusion criteria established by the authors. The remaining 7 studies are presented below and in Table 1.

Table 1.

Studies evaluating cognitive function in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).

Reference Study type Number of CIS patients Control group Time between CIS and cognitive evaluation % of cognitive
impaired
CIS patients
Neuropsychological
findings
Correlation
between cognitive
findings and
neuroimaging
Psychiatric
co-morbidities
evaluation
Feinstein et al. 19924 Cohort 16 No 4 and ½ years Not available Attention Positive: T1
relaxation times
Yes (fatigue and depression)
Audoin et al. 200510 Cross-sectional 18 18 controls 3 to 24 months 50 Processing speed Positive:
different pattern of functional
MRI activation
No
Nilsson et al. 200812 Cross-sectional 22 No 24-31 years 68 - 1 cognitive
domain
31.8 - 2 or more
cognitive domains
Visual spatial skillsExecutive functionsProcessing speed Negative No
Potagas et al. 20089 Cross-sectional 33 43 controls Not shown 27.3 Processing speedWorking memory Not evaluated Yes
(depression)
Summers et al. 200813 Cohort 25 No 7 years 48 AttentionProcessing speed Positive: number
of T2 lesions
Yes (anxiety and depression)
Feuillet et al. 20078 Cross-sectional 40 30 controls 2.8 ± 0.5 years 80 - 1 cognitive
domain
57.5 - two or more cognitive domais
Working and short term memoryProcessing speedAttention Executive functions Not evaluated Yes
(depression)
Glanz et al. 200714 Cross-sectional 15 27 controls Not mentioned 49 - 1 cognitive
domain
29 - 2 or more
cognitive domains
Working memoryProcessing speedVerbal memory Negative Yes
(depression)

The first published study included 48 patients with an isolated lesion of the type seen in MS.4 An initial cognitive evaluation was done after the first clinical manifestation and included Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale (WAIS); Recognition memory tests for words and faces; Wisconsin card sorting test; speed of letter counting; auditory attention test; graded naming test; paired-associate learning test and the Story recall test. The authors found an attention decline but did not report the percentage of patients with this decline. After a 4.5-year follow up, 19 of the patients had converted to MS and 16 had not. Those patients who had converted to MS had greater visual memory impairment compared with those who had not converted. The attention scores remained unchanged, except in the group of MS patients classified as chronic progressive in whom the auditory attention tasks had deteriorated. The potential confounding effect of fatigue and psychiatric comorbidities was assessed in this study. The authors concluded that cognitive abnormalities can be seen in patients with an isolated lesion and that these abnormalities may worsen as conversion to MS occurs. In the MRI evaluation, T1 relaxation times in normal-appearing white matter correlated positively with cognitive impairment.

Audoin et al.10 compared 18 CIS patients with 18 healthy controls using the Paced Auditory Serial Attention Test (PASAT) and neuroimaging with functional MRI. The mean PASAT performance was lower in the CIS group. Half of the CIS patients had an impaired PASAT performance. These authors had found similar results in a previous small study11 involving 10 patients.

Nilsson et al.12 used a neuropsychological battery including the Boston Naming Test, 16-Item Token Test, Logical Memory, Rey Complex Figure, Trail Making Test, PASAT, and Wiscosin Card Sorting Test in 22 CIS patients aged 24 to 31 years after optic neuritis. Most (15 patients, 68%) had at least one affected cognitive domain and 7 had two or more domains affected. The most frequent affected domains were visual spatial skills, executive functions and processing speed. There was not a control group and psychiatric co-morbidities were not evaluated. No apparent correlation was found between MRI findings and cognitive functions.

Potagas et al.9 evaluated 33 CIS patients. These authors used the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRBN) which includes Selective Reminding Test (SRT) - Long-term storage SRTL, consistent long-term SRTC and delayed recall SRTD; 10/36 Spatial Recall Test (SPART); Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), PASAT, and Word List Generation. Patients with impairment in three out of nine tests were considered as having cognitive impairment. The group also evaluated patients with relapsing remitting MS, secondary progressive MS, and healthy controls. The Beck Depression Inventory was used for depression screening. The percentage of cognitive impairment was 82.8% in patients with secondary progressive MS, 40% in the group of patients with relapsing remitting MS, and 27.3% in the CIS group. When comparing CIS and MS patients the authors found that CIS patients were less frequently impaired than patients with MS.

Summers et al.13 evaluated 62 patients, seven years after presenting CIS. The neuropsychological evaluation included the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, story and figure recall subtests of the Adult Memory and Information Battery, Spatial Working Memory - CANTAB and Hayling Sentence Completion Task, Brixton Spatial Anticipation Test, PASAT, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Those falling below the 5th percentile or < 2 SD below the mean were considered to have impairment. There was no control group and psychiatric co-morbidities were not evaluated. At the time of evaluation, 25 patients were still classified as having CIS, 12 of whom were cognitively impaired and 13 cognitively unimpaired. The most frequent cognitive impairment was attention/speed of information processing. There was a correlation between the number of T2 lesions 3 months after CIS episode and attention impairment.

Feuillet et al.8 evaluated 40 CIS patients with a mean of 2.8±0.5 years of disease. The authors used the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRBN). Thirty healthy controls were also evaluated. The Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale was used to assess depressive symptoms. A total of 80% of the CIS patients and 50% of controls obtained scores below the normal range on at least one test. Twenty three (57%) CIS patients and two controls (7%) failed at least two tests (p<0.0001). The most commonly affected cognitive abilities were working memory and short term memory, speed of information processing, attention, and executive functions. There was no correlation between depression and cognitive findings.

Glanz et al.14 evaluated 92 patients with CIS or newly diagnosed MS. Fifteen patients were classified as having CIS although the authors did not evaluate the findings of CIS and MS patients separately. Twenty seven healthy controls were also evaluated. The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRBN) was used. Depression was evaluated with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Fourty nine CIS/MS patients demonstrated impairment in at least one cognitive measure and 20% were impaired on at least two measures. The most common impairment was found in working memory and processing speed followed by verbal memory. No correlation was observed between depression and the cognitive deficits or between cognitive findings and MRI lesions.

In these seven studies, a total of one hundred sixty nine CIS patients were cognitively evaluated. Most of these studies were cross-sectional. The time of neuropsychological assessment varied from three months to 31 years after CIS onset. The percentage of cognitively impaired CIS patients ranged from 27% to 80% of the patients according to the neuropsychological battery and the normality threshold adopted in each study. The neuropsychological tests also varied considerably from study to study. Nevertheless, the pattern of affected cognitive domains was similar across the studies. The most affected neuropsychological domains were attention, processing speed, working memory and executive functions. Association between cognitive dysfunction and neuroimaging finding was determined in four out of five studies. Most of the studies evaluated a potential confounding effect of depression on cognitive functioning, but none found any association between depression and neuropsychological impairment. However, other psychiatric disorders and fatigue were not investigated.

Discussion

The cognitive domains principally affected in MS are memory, processing speed, attention, and executive functions. Fully developed dementia is rare in MS patients but the mild cognitive impairment may result in significant functional disability.15,16 According to the CIS selected studies cited above, the pattern of cognitive impairment found in CIS patients is the same as previously described for MS patients.5,9 Therefore, the cognitive findings in MS may appear from the first demyelinating attack or even before. However, little is known about how these cognitive abnormalities change with disease evolution. In two of the above-mentioned studies the cognitive findings of CIS patients were compared with cognitive findings of MS patients. Feinstein et al.4 found that attention deficit persisted 4 and ½ years after the first attack but memory declined in the group of patients who converted to MS yet not among those who still had CIS after that time. Potagas et al.9 found that cognitive disturbances were more frequent in MS patients than in CIS patients. These studies suggest that cognitive abnormalities are slightly more frequent and more pronounced in MS than in CIS patients. This issue is very important since several studies have demonstrated that the early introduction of immunomodulatory medications, such as interferons and glatiramer acetate, can delay the conversion of CIS to MS.15-18 Future studies should investigate whether the use of such medications in CIS patients influence the outcome of cognitive function.

There is not yet a clear explanation of why cognitive impairment occurs in CIS. The mechanisms of cognitive abnormalities in CIS are most likely the same as those in MS. The mechanisms that lead to the development of cognitive abnormalities in patients with multiple sclerosis have been studied. It has been shown that the burden of T-2 weighted lesions of some cerebral areas is associated with attention and working memory. This suggests that cognitive performance is affected by the number and the localization of demyelinating CNS lesions, affecting the functioning of brain circuits involved in these cognitive functions.19 Studies have also shown that cognitive deterioration increases in parallel with the decrease in brain parenchymal volume.20 Since brain atrophy is a marker of the neurodegenerative process in MS, this suggests that axonal loss is one of the determinants of cognitive impairment in MS.21 Considering that besides symptomatic lesions, patients with CIS have silent demyelinating lesions,3 it is possible that these lesions may interfere with the functioning of brain circuits related with cognition. Also, it has been demonstrated that axonal degeneration begins in early stages of MS and CIS.3 Thus, early neurodegeneration may be another explanation as to why these cognitive abnormalities are evident in patients with CIS. Further studies should analyze the precise role of the localization of brain lesions, the burden of white matter lesions, and the extent of axonal damage in the cognitive performance of CIS patients.

We conclude that there is sufficient evidence that cognitive impairment is present in CIS patients, resembling the cognitive findings of MS patients, albeit less frequent and less intense. Future studies are necessary to assess the impact of these abnormalities on quality of life of CIS patients. A more detailed investigation of the influence of psychiatric co-morbidities on the cognitive pattern of CIS patients is also warranted. Future studies should also address whether patients with CIS and distinct clinical presentations have different patterns of cognitive performance. The future studies in this field should take into account the high heterogeneity of this syndrome and therefore should include more homogeneous CIS populations in terms of time elapsed between clinical onset and neuropsychological evaluation, and with regard to clinical presentation. Cognitive impairment is highly disabling in MS patients3,5 given that it can be found when patients first present with CIS, the inclusion of neuropsychological evaluation in clinical and therapeutic studies will allow a better understanding of the initial stages of this disease.

Footnotes

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Tintoré M, Rovira A, Rio J, et al. Is optic neuritis more benign than other first attacks in multiple sclerosis? Ann Neurol. 2005;57:210–215. doi: 10.1002/ana.20363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thrower BW. Clinically isolated syndromes: predicting and delaying multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;68(24) Suppl 4:12–15. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277704.56189.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simioni S, Ruffieux C, Bruggimann L, Annoni JM, Schluep M. Cognition, mood and fatigue in patients in the early stage of multiple sclerosis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137(35-36):496–501. doi: 10.4414/smw.2007.11874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feinstein A, Kartsounis LD, Miller DH, Youl BD, Ron MA. Clinically isolate lesions of the type seen in multiple sclerosis: a cognitive, psychiatric and MRI follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:869–876. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.10.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Achiron A, Barak Y. Cognitive changes in early MS: a call for a common framework. J Neurol Sci. 2006;245:47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Stefano N, Narayanan S, Francis GS, Arnaoutelis R, Tartaglia MC, Antel JP. Evidence of axonal damage in the early stages of multiple sclerosis and its relevance to disability. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:65–70. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amato MP, Zipoli V, Goretti B, et al. Benign multiple sclerosis cognitive, psychological and social aspects in a clinical cohort. J Neurol. 2006;253:1054–1059. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Feuillet L, Reuter F, Audoin B, et al. Early cognitive impairment in patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007;13:124–127. doi: 10.1177/1352458506071196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Potagas C, Giogkaraki E, Koutsis G, et al. Cognitive impairment in different MS subtypes and clinically isolated syndromes. J Neurol Sci. 2008;267:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Audoin B, Au Duong MV, Ranjeva JP, et al. Magnetic resonance study of the influence of tissue damage and cortical reorganization on PASAT performance at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;24:216–228. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Audoin B, Ibarrola D, Ranjeva J, et al. Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003;20:51–58. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nilsson P, Rorsman I, Larsson EM, Norrving B, Sandberg-Wollheim M. Cognitive dysfunction 24-31 years after isolated optic neuritis. Mult Scler. 2008;14:913–918. doi: 10.1177/1352458508090669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Summers M, Swanton J, Fernando K, et al. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis can be predicted by imaging early in the disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:955–958. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.138685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Glanz BI, Holland CM, Gauthier SA, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with clinically isolated syndromes or newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007;13:1004–1010. doi: 10.1177/1352458507077943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, et al. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta-1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:987–997. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70237-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, et al. Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1503–1511. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61259-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Filippi M, Rovaris M, Inglese M, et al. ETOMS Study Group Interferon beta-1a for brain tissue loss in patients at presentation with syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:1489–1496. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17271-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beck RW, Chandler DL, Cole SR, et al. Interferon beta-1a for early multiple sclerosis: CHAMPS trial subgroup analyses. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:481–490. doi: 10.1002/ana.10148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sperling RA, Guttmann CR, Hohol MJ, et al. Regional magnetic resonance imaging lesion burden and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:115–121. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Amato MP, Portaccio E, Goretti B, et al. Association of neocortical volume changes with cognitive deterioration in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:1157–1161. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.8.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sepulcre J, Sastre-Garriga J, Cercignani M, Ingle GT, Miller DH, Thompson AJ. Regional gray matter atrophy in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a voxel-based morphometry study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1175–1180. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.8.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dementia & Neuropsychologia are provided here courtesy of Academia Brasileira de Neurologia

RESOURCES