Summary
Silicon nanocrystals of the average diameter of 5 nm, functionalized with 4,7-di(2-thienyl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole chromophores (TBT) and dodecyl chains, exhibit near-infrared emission upon one-photon (1P) excitation at 515 nm and two-photon (2P) excitation at 960 nm. By using TBT chromophores as an antenna we were able to enhance both 1P and 2P absorption cross-sections of the silicon nanocrystals to more efficiently excite their long-lived luminescence. These results chart a path to two-photon-excitable imaging probes with long-lived oxygen-independent luminescence - a rare combination of properties that should allow for a substantial increase in imaging contrast.
ETOC Blurb
Silicon nanocrystals with an average diameter of 5 nm have been functionalized with dye molecules at their surfaces. The resulting nanostructures work as molecular light-harvesting antennae: upon one-photon (1P) excitation at 515 nm or two-photon (2P) excitation at 960 nm of the peripheral dyes, the excitation energy is funneled to the silicon core and results in the sensitized emission in the near-infrared spectral region. The resulting emission is long-lived and oxygen-independent: two important properties for a substantial increase in imaging contrast.
Introduction
Silicon nanocrystals (SiNCs) are an emerging class of luminescent materials,[1–5] whose optical properties can be tuned by varying the nanocrystal size.[1,2,6] The key features that inspire interest in SiNCs include the high natural abundance of silicon, lack of any known biological toxicity of Si nanoparticles [7–11] and ease of their surface passivation, which is necessary to prevent nanocrystals’ oxidation and can be achieved by covalently linking protecting layers directly to silicon.[12,13] The most interesting and perhaps the most potentially useful feature of SiNCs is their bright long-lived (tens-to-hundreds of microseconds) luminescence.[14–17] Presently, there are only three other types of luminescent materials possessing this property: 1) phosphorescent complexes of some transition metals (e.g. Pt and Pd porphyrins, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and alike etc); 2) molecular complexes of lanthanides; and 3) lanthanide-based upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs). The emission of the first group of compounds is highly oxygen-sensitive, as it originates in the triplet spin states. Consequently, the emission intensities and decay times vary greatly with oxygenation, complicating quantitative imaging of probes’ distributions in hetergeneously oxygenated biological environments. In addition, triplet emitters are potentially phototoxic, since their excitation leads to generation of singlet oxygen. Emission from lanthanide ions is oxygen-insensitive, but it is highly quenched by OH, NH and CH vibrations. The luminescence of UCNPs is oxygen-insensitive and is much less quenched than that of naked lanthanide ions, but the emission quantum yields of UCNPs are extremely low (in the order of 10−3–10−4). It follows that SiNCs occupy a unique niche,[1,5,18] possessing simultaneously microsecond lifetimes, high emission quantum yields and being insensitive to quenching neither by oxygen nor by bond vibrations. This rare combination of properties provides a strong incentive for further development of SiNCs as a platform for construction of imaging materials.
While having useful emission properties, SiNCs are rather weak light absorbers, which is explained by the indirect nature of the band gap in silicon-based materials.[19,20] Low absorption limits the luminescence brightness of Si nanocrystals, i.e. the product of the molar absorption coefficient at the excitation wavelength and the emission quantum yield. SiNCs are most efficiently excited in the UV region (300–400 nm; ε = 5 × 105 M−1 cm−1 at 400 nm for SiNCs of 5 nm diameter),[6] while emitting in the red (λmax = 650 nm). To enhance the absorption cross-sections, SiNCs can be decorated at the surface by antenna chromophores capable of funneling excitation energy to the SiNC core. Molecular light-harvesting antennae have been widely explored in the area of colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals, e.g. CdSe.[21,22] However, up to now only a few studies have examined energy transfer as a means to induce light emission from SiNCs.[14,18,23,24]
Because UV radiation is damaging to biological tissues, development of methods for excitation of SiNCs in the near-infrared (NIR) region of the spectrum is a necessary step towards their application in bioimaging. To this end, one attractive possibility is presented by two-photon (2P) excitation[25–28] - a non-linear optical technique, whose main advantages include increased depth of imaging, higher spatial resolution and reduced tissue photodamage. Unfortunately, SiNCs exhibit quite low two-photon absorption (2PA) cross sections, as one would expect based on the indirect band gap nature of their electronic transitions. For example, the 2PA spectrum observed for SiNCs (average diameter 3 nm) in hexane (Figure S8) shows rather moderate 2PA cross-section values (σ(2)), which are comparable to those of conventional fluorescent dyes,[29,30] while being 3–4 orders of magnitude lower than the cross-sections of colloidal nanocrystals.[31–35]
One approach to increase 2PA cross-sections of SiNCs is to attach multiple two-photon absorbing chromophores to their surfaces, forming a 2P light-harvesting antenna. This approach has been successfully employed, for example, in construction of 2P-ehanced dendrimeric scaffolds,[36–41] or porous silicon nanoparticles.[42,43] To the best of our knowledge, no example exists today of emission of SiNCs sensitized by 2P antennae. In the present paper, we demonstrate that covalently linking 2PA chromophores based on 4,7-di(2-thienyl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (hereafter named TBT) to SiNCs is a viable route to enhance their luminescence upon NIR excitation. As a result, multiphoton excitation becomes combined in SiNCs with their microsecond-scale luminescence, paving a path to imaging probes with unprecendently high imaging contrast.
Results and discussion
Synthesis and structural characterization
TBT was synthesized and characterized as described in the Supporting Information (Figure S1 and S2).
SiNCs can be conveniently synthesized by thermal decomposition of hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ) at 1200°C to give oxide-embedded silicon nanocrystals that are liberated by etching and then passivated by thermal hydrosilylation using terminal alkenes (Scheme 1).[44,45] Thus produced SiNCs have controllable size, high monodispersity, passivated surface, good dispersibility in organic solvents and high stability.[14,45,46] In the present study, the SiNCs were passivated with a mixture of 1-dodecene and TBT (dodecene:TBT molar ratio of 52:1), giving modified nanocrystals (hereafter named Si-TBT). The length of the bridge which links the chromophore to the silicon nanocrystal is a key parameter for the energy transfer efficiency, as we have previously investigated in the case of pyrene chromophores.[23] The current length represents a good compromise to obtain a high efficiency of energy transfer (see below) and a good degree of functionalization of SiNC surface. Indeed, chromophore molecules are bulkier than alkyl chains, and when connecting linkers are short, coverage of the SiNC surfaces may be poor due to the steric constraints, and the luminescence quantum yield may be strongly diminished as a consequence.
For control and comparison, SiNCs were also passivated using 1-dodecene only (hereafter named Si). The resulting materials were purified by centrifugation (8000 rpm for 5 min, corresponding to a relative centrifugal force of 8230 G), after which the precipitate, containing poorly capped and thus less soluble SiNCs was removed. The supernatant was purified by several centrifugation/precipitation cycles using toluene/ethanol solvent-antisolvent pair. The final samples were dispersed in toluene. A sample of SiNCs capped by dodecyl chains and dispersed in hexane was used for measurements of 2P absorption spectrum and it was available from previous studies.[23] Characterization of the silicon nanocrystals was performed by transmission electron microscopy and FTIR spectroscopy (see Figure S3 and S4).
Photophysical properties of TBT
Compound TBT is a π-conjugated donor-acceptor-donor chromophore comprising two thiophene donor units and a benzothiadiazole acceptor unit. The symmetry of TBT is broken, since one of the thiophenes carries an additional electron-donating methoxyphenyl substituent. TBT has high molar absorption coefficient in the blue region of the spectrum (Figure 1a, black line) and strong fluorescence, e.g. in toluene with maximum at 620 nm and the quantum yield of 83%. Upon increase in the solvent polarity, TBT exhibits a small shift of the absorption band (Figure S7) and a large red-shift of the emission (Figure 1b), e.g. from 580 to 674 nm in going from hexane to dimethylsulfoxide. This red shift of the fluorescence is accompanied by a decrease in the quantum yield: from 92% to 42% in going from hexane to dimethylsulfoxide. Such strong solvatofluorism as well as the large Stokes shift between the absorption and emission maxima are an indication of a strongly polar excited state.
2PA spectra were measured by the two-photon excitation method, whereby the sample was excited by a continuous train of femtosecond pulses from a tunable Ti:sapphire laser oscillator (80 MHz rep. rate), and the emission was registered by a CCD-based spectrometer (see SI and ref. [47] for details). After normalization and correction (see SI for details), the plot of the integrated emission intensity vs excitation wavelength gave the relative 2PA absorption spectrum. The latter was referenced to the 2PA spectrum of a standard (Rhodamine B in MeOH), for which 2PA cross-sections was known from the literature.[48,49] At each excitation wavelength, the dependence of the emission signal on the excitation flux was confirmed to be quadratic (see Figure S9).
The 2PA spectrum of TBT is shown in Figure 1a, red line. The lowest energy transition (S0→S1, 480 nm) shows a small 2PA cross-section (σ(2)<10 GM), while there is a much stronger 2P band (σ(2) = 150 GM) at 365 nm (λ2P=730 nm).
Modeling structural and optical properties of TBT
To assist the analysis of the 1P and 2P spectra of TBT, quantum chemical calculations were carried out on a symmetric model, which lacks the alkoxybenzene moiety (hereafter named mTBT), and on the target molecule (see Scheme 2).
To inspect the nature of the excited states and to evaluate the excitation energies, TD-CAM-B3LYP/6-31G** calculations were carried out for mTBT and TBT. According to the calculations, the lowest energy absorption band in the spectra of both chromophores is dominated by the HOMO-LUMO (H→L) single-electron excitation. As shown in Figure S5, the HOMO is substantially delocalized over the entire chromophore, while the LUMO is localized primarily on the acceptor moiety, thereby conveying a partial charge transfer character to the lowest excited state (S1). For TBT the static dipole moment of S1 is calculated to be 7.25 D at the ground state geometry, compared to 1.97 D in the ground state. The equilibrium structure of the lowest excited state of TBT was also computed (see Figure S6), and the dipole moment in this geometry retains the large value of 6.69 D. Therefore, the strong sensitivity to solvent polarity of the TBT emission energy can be associated with the higher polarity of the lowest excited state compared to the ground state.[50]
For both mTBT and TBT, the second singlet excited state (S2) was found to be dominated by (H-1→L) excitation. For TBT this excited state also exhibits charge transfer character and a large static dipole moment of 6.77 D (computed for ground state geometry). The computed oscillator strength f (S0→S2) is negligible for mTBT (Table S1) and quite small also for TBT (Table 1). The second experimentally observed intense transition in the linear (one-photon) absorption spectrum of TBT is therefore attributed to a higher excited singlet state (S3) and similarly in mTBT. The S1→S3 transition is dominated by the (H→L+1) excitation, having a weaker charge transfer character. The static dipole moment of TBT in S3 is computed to be 4.60 D at the ground state geometry. A comparison of the experimental and computed one-photon absorption spectra of TBT is shown in Figure 2.
Table 1.
Excited state | λabs/nma | σ(2)/GMb | fc | Wavefunction composition |
---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 494 | 54 | 0.74 | (H→L) |
S2 | 340 | 1010 | 0.26 | (H-1→L) |
S3 | 318 | 1710 | 0.56 | (H→L+1) |
S4 | 292 | 620 | 0.07 | (H-2→L) |
Owing to the well know overestimate of the CAM-B3LYP functional, the computed excitation energies were red shifted by 0,25 eV to facilitate the comparison with experiment.
Two photon absorption cross-section for linearly polarized light (both photon with parallel polarization).
One photon oscillator strength.
Thus, the second absorption band in the 1P spectrum of TBT encompasses two electronic transitions. In light of this observation we note that the maximum of the 2P transition (Figure 1) overlaps with the shoulder of the broad 1P band (λmax=335 nm), suggesting that the second of the three lowest excited states of TBT (and mTBT) can be more 2P-active.
Considering a chromophore with a centrosymmetrical structure, its 2PA properties may be described by the well-known three-state model,[51] whereby the S1 state plays the role of the key intermediate state promoting 2P transition to a higher two-photon active state (presumably S0→S2).[52] The large value of the transition dipole moment for S0→S1 excitation and the proximity of the laser energy to the S1 energy when the laser is at resonance with the 2P state (presumably S2) would both contribute to the enhancement of 2PA in symmetrical dyes, such as mTBT.[53,54] In addition, large difference between the static dipole moments in the ground and final 2P states may also be a factor increasing the strength of the corresponding transition as shown by the following simplified equation for 2PA:[55]
(1) |
where ħω is the photon energy, μff and μii are permanent moments of the final and initial states and μpi and μfp are transition dipole moments involving the intermediate state p whose excitation energy is Epi.
The computed 2PA cross-sections for the four lowest excited states are collected in Table 1 for TBT and Table S1 for mTBT. The lowest excited states of both TBT and mTBT display modest 2P activity, which agrees with our experiments. The transition to the second excited state (S2), which is characterized by a low oscillator strength, shows quite large 2PA activity, that is further enhanced in going from symmetrical mTBT to less symmetrical TBT system. The four lowest energy transitions of mTBT exhibit alternating 1PA/2PA pattern,[53] indicating that the selection rules for centrosymmetrical molecules still prevails in spite of the lack of an inversion center, as observed for other non-centrosymmetrical chromophores.[56] The enhancement of the 2PA of S2 in TBT vs mTBT may be attributed to the contribution of the static dipole moment terms in eq. (1) considering that the transition dipole moment to S2 is negligible for mTBT and not for TBT.
Photophysical properties of Si-TBT
Given that a large number of TBT moieties are attached to each nanocrystal in Si-TBT conjugates, we set out to investigate whether TBT arrays can act as an antenna, capable of sensitizing emission of SiNCs. The linear absorption spectrum of Si-TBT in toluene (black line in Figure 3a) is nearly a superposition of the TBT features (Figure 1a) and the typical featureless absorption of SiNCs (red line in Figure 3a), suggesting that these two electronic systems are not strongly coupled neither in the ground nor in the excited states. Based on the molar absorption coefficients of the two components, on average eighteen TBT chromophores were estimated to be associated with each nanocrystal.[6]
Upon excitation of the TBT chromophore at 515 nm, strong quenching (ca. 95%) of the TBT fluorescence at 640 nm was observed in the Si-TBT system (black line in Figure 3b), as compared to the TBT in an optically matched mixture containing TBT and Si (green line in Figure 3b). Furthermore, the lifetime of the fluorescent excited state of TBT was found to be strongly decreased (ca. 95%), i.e. from 7.9 ns for the free chromophore in toluene to 0.4 ns when TBT was bound to SiNCs.⊥ Concomitantly, sensitized NIR long-lived emission of SiNCs was observed (Figure 3b, τ=160 μs at 800 nm), confirming that the light absorbed by TBT sensitizes emission of the SiNC core. The sensitization was further confirmed by running time-delayed excitation spectra (λem=800 nm) with emission collected 40 μs after the excitation pulse, when all the prompt signals have already decayed (inset of Figure 3a), and only the long-lived emission signals last. The efficiency of the sensitization was estimated to be ca. 75% (see Supporting Information and Figure S11 for details).
Excitation of Si-TBT at 390 nm, where most (>95%) of the light is absorbed by the silicon core, resulted in the near-infrared emission with the quantum yield of 23%, as compared to 45% for dodecyl-capped Si.≠ A decrease in the quantum yield has been reported previously for silicon nanocrystals modified with other organic dyes,[14,24] and it can be related to an increase in the number of defects at the nanocrystals’ surfaces due to the steric bulk of the chromophore moieties that preclude homogeneous passivation by an alkyl layer.
Upon excitation at 515 nm, the brightness of Si-TBT is 2 times higher compared to Si.
It is worth a note that TBT chromophore is not only an efficient sensitizer of the SiNC emission, but also its fluorescence maximum is indicative of the polarity of the environment, e.g. shifting from 590 to 640 nm in going from hexane to dichloromethane.
Sensitization of the SiNC emission upon excitation of Si-TBT near the maximum of the 2PA spectrum (730 nm) turned out to be impossible to quantify because of the strongly interfering one-photon absorption by the silicon core itself. Although the linear absorption cross-section of SiNC at 730 nm is very small, extremely high excitation flux produced by the ultrafast laser pulses made the contribution of this linear absorption dominant and the power dependence of the emission strictly linear. In contrast, excitation of Si-TBT at 960 nm (Figure S12), despite the low 2PA cross-section at that wavelength, resulted in a clearly observable luminescence, characterized by a close to quadratic power dependence (see inset in Figure 4). The decay of the luminescence intensity of the SiNC core (emission integrated for λem<900 nm) upon excitation of Si-TBT at 960 nm is shown in Figure 4 (black line) along with the decay of the luminescence of Si alone (red line). Although the latter emission is observable, the luminescence of Si-TBT is much stronger due to the enhancement effect of the TBT antenna. The average decay times of the luminescence of Si and Si-TBT were found to be different, whereby the luminescence of Si-TBT was decaying faster, reflecting its lower quantum yield.
In order to quantify the antenna effect, the decays were measured using sample solutions containing equal concentrations of SiNCs, i.e. solutions isoabsorbing at 390 nm (Figure 3a). Upon excitation by pulses of equal power, the initial intensities of the luminescence signals of Si and Si-TBT in such samples should be proportional to the initially created excited state populations and therefore to the absorption rate constants. The initial intensity of the luminescence of Si-TBT was found to be two times higher than that of Si, demonstrating two-fold increase in the 2PA. The increase in the power dependence slope in going from Si to Si-TBT (Figure 4) indicates higher contribution of 2PA in the case of Si-TBT as result of this antenna effect.
Because of the instrument limitations, it was not possible to measure the 2PA spectrum of the Si and Si-TBT samples in order to make a comparison of 2P cross sections in a wide spectral range. However, the low 2P cross-section of SiNCs[25] is confirmed by the 2PA spectrum measured from a sample of dodecyl capped SiNCs with 3 nm diameter dispersed in hexane (Figure S8).
Conclusions
Silicon nanocrsytals have recently emerged as a new class of luminescent materials for light-emitting diodes, sensing and bioimaging. In order to make them suitable for biomedical applications a number of requirements have to be met, starting with increasing their efficiency in absorbing light at the visible-NIR range limit as well as proving their stability in water. Here, we demonstrated that surface functionalization of luminescent SiNCs with multiple (18 per nanoparticle, as an average) dithienyl-benzothiadiazole chromophores (TBT) effectively increases the SiNCs apparent 1P and 2P absorption cross-sections. Upon excitation of the TBT antenna in the visible spectral region (λmax = 480 nm) efficient energy transfer (η=75%) sensitizes NIR emission of SiNC (λmax= 920 nm). Moreover, because TBT has relatively high two-photon absorption cross section in the red and NIR spectral region, emission of the SiNC core can be sensitized also upon 2P excitation at 960 nm. In contrast, direct 2P excitation of SiNC is inefficient.
To the best of our knowledge, the present system is the first example of a light-harvesting two-photon antenna used to sensitize emission of SiNCs. This result opens up the potential for bioimaging applications, such as increased depth of imaging, higher resolution and reduced risk of photodamage, can be coupled with the bright, long-lived and oxygen-insensitive NIR luminescence of SiNCs. It is thus a rare combination of properties that allow for microsecond-scale time-gate detection: background autofluorescence and scattered excitation light can be removed by low-cost equipment, resulting in an increase of contrast and signal-to-noise ratio in images. Further studies will be devoted to optimization of the antenna system for better emission sensitization as well as to obtaining solubility of SiNCs in aqueous environments.
Supplementary Material
The bigger picture.
Silicon nanocrystals (SiNCs) occupy a niche in the realm of quantum dots, offering several advantages: silicon is abundant, essentially non-toxic and can form robust chemical bonds with ligands at the nanocrystal surface. From the optical point of view, SiNCs are strong light emitters, but weak absorbers. The latter drawback was circumvented by their surface functionalization with chromophores that are strong light absorbers and are able to efficiently transfer the excitation energy to the silicon core. Here, we present a step further: functionalization of SiNCs with multiple two-photon absorbing chromophores, forming a 2P light-harvesting antenna. The 2P antenna enables excitation of SiNCs in the near-infrared (NIR) region of the spectrum, charting a path to applications in bioimaging. Long-lived oxygen-insensitive luminescence and two-photon excitability is a rare combination of properties, which may allow unprecedentedly high contrast in images from scattering biological tissues.
Highligths.
Silicon nanocrystals (SiNCs) are weak light absorbers, but highly luminescent
Excitation of benzothiadiazole chromophores attached to SiNCs sensitizes core emission
An antenna by 2-photon excitation is coupled to long-lived SiNC luminescence
Acknowledgments
LR, ML, GB and PC gratefully acknowledge financial support by the European Commission ERC Starting Grant (PhotoSi, 278912). SAV acknowledges financial support of the grants EB018464 and NS092986 from the National Institutes of Health, USA. YY and BAK acknowledge financial support from the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-1464) and the US National Science Foundation (CHE-1308813).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
The fluorescence decay of Si-TBT was fitted by a biexponential curve since a small fraction of free TBT was present in the sample (ca. 10%).
In order to compare the photophysical properties as a function of the dimension of the silicon core, the same experiments were performed also for SiNC with average diameter of 3 nm (see SI and Figure S10 for details).
Experimental Procedures. Full experimental procedures are provided in the Supplemental Information.
Author Contributions. P.C., S. A. V. and B. A. K. conceived the project. Q. C. and Y. M. synthesized the dye. M. L., Y. Y. and B. A. K. synthesized the Si nanocrystals. L. R., G. B. and P. C. conducted photophysical characterization and analysis. L. R., S. A. V. and P. C. performed 2P excitation experiments. F. N. performed the computational studies. All authors participated in writing the manuscript.
References
- 1.McVey BFP, Tilley RD. Solution Synthesis, Optical Properties, and Bioimaging Applications of Silicon Nanocrystals. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47:3045–3051. doi: 10.1021/ar500215v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mastronardi ML, Henderson EJ, Puzzo DP, Ozin GA. Small Silicon, Big Opportunities: The Development and Future of Colloidally-Stable Monodisperse Silicon Nanocrystals. Adv Mater. 2012;24:5890–8. doi: 10.1002/adma.201202846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gonzalez CM, Iqbal M, Dasog M, Piercey DG, Lockwood R, Klapotke TM, et al. Detection of high-energy compounds using photoluminescent silicon nanocrystal paper based sensors. Nanoscale. 2014;6:2608–12. doi: 10.1039/C3NR06271F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yi Y, Zhu G, Liu C, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Li H, et al. A Label-Free Silicon Quantum Dots-Based Photoluminescence Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Pesticides. Anal Chem. 2013;85:11464–70. doi: 10.1021/ac403257p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dasog M, Kehrle J, Rieger B, Veinot JGC. Silicon nanocrystals and silicon-polymer hybrids: Synthesis, surface engineering, and applications. Angew Chemie - Int Ed. 2016;55:2322–39. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hessel CM, Reid D, Panthani MG, Rasch MR, Goodfellow BW, Wei J, et al. Synthesis of Ligand-Stabilized Silicon Nanocrystals with Size-Dependent Photoluminescence Spanning Visible to Near-Infrared Wavelengths. Chem Mater. 2012;24:393–401. doi: 10.1021/cm2032866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alsharif NH, Berger CEM, Varanasi SS, Chao Y, Horrocks BR, Datta HK. Alkyl-capped silicon nanocrystals lack cytotoxicity and have enhanced intracellular accumulation in malignant cells via cholesterol-dependent endocytosis. Small. 2009;5:221–8. doi: 10.1002/smll.200800903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ruizendaal L, Bhattacharjee S, Pournazari K, Rosso-Vasic M, de Haan LHJ, Alink GM, et al. Synthesis and cytotoxicity of silicon nanoparticles with covalently attached organic monolayers. Nanotoxicology. 2009;3:339–47. doi: 10.3109/17435390903288896. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park J-H, Gu L, von Maltzahn G, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ. Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nat Mater. 2009;8:331–6. doi: 10.1038/nmat2398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhattacharjee S, Rietjens IMCM, Singh MP, Atkins TM, Purkait TK, Xu Z, et al. Cytotoxicity of surface-functionalized silicon and germanium nanoparticles: the dominant role of surface charges. Nanoscale. 2013;5:4870. doi: 10.1039/c3nr34266b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McVey BFP, Prabakar S, Gooding JJ, Tilley RD. Solution Synthesis, Surface Passivation, Optical Properties, Biomedical Applications, and Cytotoxicity of Silicon and Germanium Nanocrystals. Chempluschem. 2016 doi: 10.1002/cplu.201600207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buriak JM. Illuminating Silicon Surface Hydrosilylation: An Unexpected Plurality of Mechanisms. Chem Mater. 2014;26:763–72. doi: 10.1021/cm402120f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kelly JA, Henderson EJ, Veinot JGC. Sol-gel precursors for group 14 nanocrystals. Chem Commun. 2010;46:8704–18. doi: 10.1039/C0CC02609C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Locritani M, Yu Y, Bergamini G, Baroncini M, Molloy JK, Korgel BA, et al. Silicon Nanocrystals Functionalized with Pyrene Units: Efficient Light-Harvesting Antennae with Bright Near-Infrared Emission. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5:3325–9. doi: 10.1021/jz501609e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rowland CE, Hannah DC, Demortière A, Yang J, Cook RE, Prakapenka VB, et al. Silicon Nanocrystals at Elevated Temperatures: Retention of Photoluminescence and Diamond Silicon to β-Silicon Carbide Phase Transition. ACS Nano. 2014;8:9219–23. doi: 10.1021/nn5029967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou Z, Brus L, Friesner R. Electronic Structure and Luminescence of 1.1- and 1.4-nm Silicon Nanocrystals: Oxide Shell versus Hydrogen Passivation. Nano Lett. 2003;3:163–7. doi: 10.1021/nl025890q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beard MC, Knutsen KP, Yu P, Luther JM, Song Q, Metzger WK, et al. Multiple Exciton Generation in Colloidal Silicon Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2007;7:2506–12. doi: 10.1021/nl071486l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Romano F, Yu Y, Korgel BA, Bergamini G, Ceroni P. Light-Harvesting Antennae Based on Silicon Nanocrystals. Top Curr Chem. 2016;374:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s41061-016-0056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hodes G. When Small Is Different: Some Recent Advances in Concepts and Applications of Nanoscale Phenomena. Adv Mater. 2007;19:639–55. doi: 10.1002/adma.200601173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kovalev D, Diener J, Heckler H, Polisski G, Künzner N, Koch F. Optical absorption cross sections of Si nanocrystals. Phys Rev B. 2000;61:4485–7. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Algar WR, Kim H, Medintz IL, Hildebrandt N. Emerging non-traditional Förster resonance energy transfer configurations with semiconductor quantum dots: Investigations and applications. Coord Chem Rev. 2014;263–264:65–85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2013.07.015. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Medintz IL, Mattoussi H. Quantum dot-based resonance energy transfer and its growing application in biology. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:17–45. doi: 10.1039/B813919A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mazzaro R, Locritani M, Molloy JK, Montalti M, Yu Y, Korgel BA, et al. Photoinduced Processes between Pyrene-Functionalized Silicon Nanocrystals and Carbon Allotropes. Chem Mater. 2015;27:4390–7. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01769. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fermi A, Locritani M, Di Carlo G, Pizzotti M, Caramori S, Yu Y, et al. Light-harvesting antennae based on photoactive silicon nanocrystals functionalized with porphyrin chromophores. Faraday Discuss. 2015;185:481–95. doi: 10.1039/C5FD00098J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.He GS, Zheng Q, Yong K-T, Erogbogbo F, Swihart MT, Prasad PN. Two- and Three-Photon Absorption and Frequency Upconverted Emission of Silicon Quantum Dots. Nano Lett. 2008;8:2688–92. doi: 10.1021/nl800982z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tu C, Ma X, Pantazis P, Kauzlarich SM, Louie AY. Paramagnetic, Silicon Quantum Dots for Magnetic Resonance and Two-Photon Imaging of Macrophages. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:2016–23. doi: 10.1021/ja909303g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Henderson EJ, Shuhendler AJ, Prasad P, Baumann V, Maier-Flaig F, Faulkner DO, et al. Colloidally stable silicon nanocrystals with near-infrared photoluminescence for biological fluorescence imaging. Small. 2011;7:2507–16. doi: 10.1002/smll.201100845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chandra S, Ghosh B, Beaune G, Nagarajan U, Yasui T, Nakamura J, et al. Functional double-shelled silicon nanocrystals for two-photon fluorescence cell imaging: spectral evolution and tuning. Nanoscale. 2016;8:9009–19. doi: 10.1039/C6NR01437B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pawlicki M, Collins HA, Denning RG, Anderson HL. Two-Photon Absorption and the Design of Two-Photon Dyes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:3244–66. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Terenziani F, Katan C, Badaeva E, Tretiak S, Blanchard-Desce M. Enhanced Two-Photon Absorption of Organic Chromophores: Theoretical and Experimental Assessments. Adv Mater. 2008;20:4641–78. doi: 10.1002/adma.200800402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Larson DR, Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Clark SW, Bruchez MP, Wise FW, et al. Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo. Science. 2003;300:1434–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1083780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lemon CM, Karnas E, Han X, Bruns OT, Kempa TJ, Fukumura D, et al. Micelle-Encapsulated Quantum Dot-Porphyrin Assemblies as in Vivo Two-Photon Oxygen Sensors. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:9832–42. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qi Z-D, Li D-W, Jiang P, Jiang F-L, Li Y-S, Liu Y, et al. Biocompatible CdSe quantum dot-based photosensitizer under two-photon excitation for photodynamic therapy. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:2455. doi: 10.1039/c0jm03229h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Martinez Maestro L, Martin Rodriguez E, Sanz Rodriguez F, Iglesias-de la Cruz MC, Juarranz A, Naccache R, et al. CdSe Quantum Dots for Two-Photon Fluorescence Thermal Imaging. Nano Lett. 2010;10:5109–15. doi: 10.1021/nl1036098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jin H, Gui R, Sun J, Wang Y. Ratiometric two-photon excited photoluminescence of quantum dots triggered by near-infrared-light for real-time detection of nitric oxide release in situ. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;922:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.He GS, Lin T-C, Cui Y, Prasad PN, Brousmiche DW, Serin JM, et al. Two-photon excited intramolecular energy transfer and light-harvesting effect in novel dendritic systems. Opt Lett. 2003;28:768–70. doi: 10.1364/OL.28.000768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Briñas RP, Troxler T, Hochstrasser RM, Vinogradov SA. Phosphorescent Oxygen Sensor with Dendritic Protection and Two-Photon Absorbing Antenna. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:11851–62. doi: 10.1021/ja052947c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wan Y, Yan L, Zhao Z, Ma X, Guo Q, Jia M, et al. Gigantic two-photon absorption cross sections and strong two-photon excited fluorescence in pyrene core dendrimers with fluorene/carbazole as dendrons and acetylene as linkages. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:11737–45. doi: 10.1021/jp104868j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mongin O, Krishna TR, Werts MH, Caminade AM, Majoral JP, Blanchard-Desce M. A modular approach to two-photon absorbing organic nanodots: brilliant dendrimers as an alternative to semiconductor quantum dots? Chem Commun. 2006:915–7. doi: 10.1039/b517270e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roussakis E, Spencer JA, Lin CP, Vinogradov SA. Two-photon antenna-core oxygen probe with enhanced performance. Anal Chem. 2014;86:5937–45. doi: 10.1021/ac501028m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lin TC, Lin WL, Wang CM, Fu CW. Synthesis and characterization of highly soluble two-photon-absorbing chromophores with multi-branched and dendritic architectures. European J Org Chem. 2011:912–21. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201001165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Secret E, Maynadier M, Gallud A, Chaix A, Bouffard E, Gary-Bobo M, et al. Two-Photon Excitation of Porphyrin-Functionalized Porous Silicon Nanoparticles for Photodynamic Therapy. Adv Mater. 2014;26:7643–8. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Knežević NŽ, Stojanovic V, Chaix A, Bouffard E, Cheikh K El, Morère A, et al. Ruthenium(ii) complex-photosensitized multifunctionalized porous silicon nanoparticles for two-photon near-infrared light responsive imaging and photodynamic cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:1337–42. doi: 10.1039/C5TB02726H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hessel CM, Henderson EJ, Veinot JGC. Hydrogen Silsesquioxane: A Molecular Precursor for Nanocrystalline Si−SiO2 Composites and Freestanding Hydride-Surface-Terminated Silicon Nanoparticles. Chem Mater. 2006;18:6139–46. doi: 10.1021/cm0602803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hessel CM, Rasch MR, Hueso JL, Goodfellow BW, Akhavan VA, Puvanakrishnan P, et al. Alkyl Passivation and Amphiphilic Polymer Coating of Silicon Nanocrystals for Diagnostic Imaging. Small. 2010;6:2026–34. doi: 10.1002/smll.201000825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Panthani MG, Hessel CM, Reid D, Casillas G, José-Yacamán M, Korgel BA. Graphene-Supported High-Resolution TEM and STEM Imaging of Silicon Nanocrystals and their Capping Ligands. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:22463–8. doi: 10.1021/jp308545q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Esipova TV, Rivera-Jacquez HJ, Weber B, Masunov AE, Vinogradov SA. Two-Photon Absorbing Phosphorescent Metalloporphyrins: Effects of π-Extension and Peripheral Substitution. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:15648–62. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Makarov NS, Drobizhev M, Rebane A. Two-photon absorption standards in the 550–1600 nm excitation wavelength range. Opt Express. 2008;16:4029–47. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.004029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu C, Webb WW. Measurement of two-photon excitation cross sections of molecular fluorophores with data from 690 to 1050 nm. J Opt Soc Am B. 1996;13:481–91. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.13.000481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Reichardt C. Solvatochromic dyes as solvent polarity indicators. Chem Rev. 1994;94:2319–58. doi: 10.1021/cr00032a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Butcher PN, Cotter D. The Elements of Nonlinear Optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Albota M, Beljonne D, Brédas J-L, Ehrlich JE, Fu J-Y, Heikal AA, et al. Design of Organic Molecules with Large Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections. Science. 1998;(80-):281. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5383.1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ellinger S, Graham KR, Shi P, Farley RT, Steckler TT, Brookins RN, et al. Donor–Acceptor–Donor-based π-Conjugated Oligomers for Nonlinear Optics and Near-IR Emission. Chem Mater. 2011;23:3805–17. doi: 10.1021/cm201424a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kato S, Matsumoto T, Shigeiwa M, Gorohmaru H, Maeda S, Ishi-i T, et al. Novel 2,1,3-Benzothiadiazole-Based Red-Fluorescent Dyes with Enhanced Two-Photon Absorption Cross-Sections. Chem Eur J. 2006;12:2303–17. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Meath WJ, Power EA. On the importance of permanent moments in multiphoton absorption using perturbation theory. J Phys B. 1984;17:763–81. doi: 10.1088/0022-3700/17/5/017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Makarov NS, Drobizhev M, Wicks G, Makarova EA, Lukyanets EA, Rebane A. Alternative selection rules for one- and two-photon transitions in tribenzotetraazachlorin: quasi-centrosymmetrical π-conjugation pathway of formally non-centrosymmetrical molecule. J Chem Phys. 2013;138:214314. doi: 10.1063/1.4807594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.