Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Sep 29;7:12416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12759-9

Global nickel anomaly links Siberian Traps eruptions and the latest Permian mass extinction

Michael R Rampino 1,2,3,, Sedelia Rodriguez 4, Eva Baransky 4, Yue Cai 5
PMCID: PMC5622041  PMID: 28963524

Abstract

Anomalous peaks of nickel abundance have been reported in Permian-Triassic boundary sections in China, Israel, Eastern Europe, Spitzbergen, and the Austrian Carnic Alps. New solution ICP-MS results of enhanced nickel from P-T boundary sections in Hungary, Japan, and Spiti, India suggest that the nickel anomalies at the end of the Permian were a worldwide phenomenon. We propose that the source of the nickel anomalies at the P-T boundary were Ni-rich volatiles released by the Siberian volcanism, and by coeval Ni-rich magma intrusions. The peaks in nickel abundance correlate with negative δ13C and δ18O anomalies, suggesting that explosive reactions between magma and coal during the Siberian flood-basalt eruptions released large amounts of CO2 and CH4 into the atmosphere, causing severe global warming and subsequent mass extinction. The nickel anomalies may provide a timeline in P-T boundary sections, and the timing of the peaks supports the Siberian Traps as a contributor to the latest Permian mass extinction.

Introduction

The end-Permian mass extinction (252 Myr ago) was the most severe in the geologic record, devastating both marine and terrestrial fauna and flora1. The Global Stratigraphic Section and Point (GSSP) for the Permian/Triassic boundary is the Meishan section in southeast China2. The latest Permian at Meishan is marked by a negative shift in carbon-isotope values in carbonates and organic carbon, which is seen worldwide in P-T boundary sections3. The carbon-isotope anomaly has been attributed by some to the release of volcanogenic carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere and oceans, from the Siberian Traps eruptions, and from explosive interactions of magma intruding carbon-rich sediments4,5.

Kaiho et al.6 reported a spike of nickel abundance (up to about 90 ppm, over a background of about 20 ppm) at the Permian-Triassic GSSP, coincident with the latest Permian negative carbon-isotope shift, and extinction level. A more recent study by Rothman et al.7 found nickel concentrations in the latest Permian at Meishan up to 250 ppm over a background of around 40 ppm (on a carbonate-free basis) at the same stratigraphic level (Fig. 1a). The Shangsi section in southern China shows a similar Ni anomaly (92 ppm over a background of less than ~30 ppm) near the latest Permian extinction level8. In addition to the Chinese sections, a search of the literature turned up similar nickel-abundance anomalies at the end of the Permian in Israel9; Western Slovenia10; Spitzbergen11; and the Gartnerkoefel GK-1 core from the Carnic Alps12 (Fig. 1b–e). We propose a relationship between the nickel anomaly and the timing of the Siberian Traps eruptions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nickel concentrations in latest Permian sediments. C marks the position of the latest Permian negative shifts in δ13C. (a) Meishan, China (zero is the latest Permian mass extinction level) (17 pts.); (b) Spitzbergen (zero is the end-Permian extinction level) (123 pts.); (c) Western Slovenia (zero is the latest Permian extinction level) (14 pts.); (d) Southern Israel (the nickel anomaly is just below the fungal event and the negative shift in δ13C that mark the P-T boundary)9 (18 pts.); (e) The Gartnerkoefel GK-1 core from the Carnic Alps in Austria (positions of nickel anomalies match two negative δ13C anomalies that bracket the P-T boundary)12 (305 pts.).

In Spitzbergen, (Fig. 1b) nickel spikes of ~100 ppm over a background of about 50 ppm occur at the latest Permian extinction level11. Nickel levels in Spitzbergen are generally greater in the early Triassic than in the latest Permian. In the Idrijka Valley, Slovenian section, the latest Permian extinction level is represented by a clayey marl layer with a maximum thickness of 0.8 cm. Nickel is somewhat enriched in the layer to 12 ppm, over a background averaging about 3 ppm10 (Fig. 1c). A core section in southern Israel shows greatly enhanced nickel (800 ppm over a background of only about 45 ppm) just below the palynological turnover and fungal event and a negative shift in δ13C that mark the P-T boundary9 (Fig. 1d). In the Gartnerkoefel GK-1 core, there are two nickel peaks, 110 ppm and 107 ppm, that occur at the times of two negative excursions of δ13C that bracket the P-T boundary12. Background Ni concentrations in that section of the core are as low as 7 ppm (Fig. 1e) (see Supplementary Information).

In these sections, as well as others, peak nickel values may have been missed as a result of relatively wide sampling of narrow peaks. Absolute values of the peaks vary, possibly because of inhomogeneous areal distribution of nickel-rich volatiles4, differences in sedimentation rates and bioturbation13, and oxic vs. anoxic depositional conditions14. For example, in several of the sections Ni may be secondarily concentrated at redox boundaries, as other redox-sensitive elements (e.g., V, Cr, Co) are also elevated at the nickel peaks1012. Under anoxic or dysoxic conditions (such as indicated by pyrite deposition), nickel will be quickly scavenged from seawater and enriched in the sediments12. Other probable volcanogenic elements (e.g., As, Cu, Pb, Sb, Zn) also show peaks correlating with the Ni peak1012. Recent study of Zn concentrations and zinc-isotopic data from the Meishan locality gives further evidence for massive volcanism at the time of the end-Permian extinction. The rapid shift in zinc isotopes suggest that zinc (along with other metals such as nickel) might be coming from volcanic ashes, hydrothermal input and/or extremely fast weathering of Siberian basalts15.

Results

Using solution ICP-MS, with standard addition method (see Methods section), we analyzed samples from P-T boundary sections in Japan (Sasayama), Hungary (Bukk Mountains), and from Spiti, India (Fig. 2). In Japan, the latest Permian extinction level (as determined by radiolarians and other taxa) is marked by a sudden shift from radiolarian cherts to organic-rich black mudstone1618. This sharp transition is close to the P-T boundary as defined by conodonts and radiolarians16. At Sasayama, there are two closely spaced nickel peaks of about 86 and 96 ppm over a background of about 20 ppm, within 10 cm of the chert/black shale contact (Fig. 2c). The Hungary section19,20 has a thin reddish clay layer at the level of the extinctions and δ13C anomaly, with elevated nickel concentrations of 45 ppm over a background of about 20 ppm (Fig. 2b). In India, the boundary interval is marked by a 1 to 5-cm thick ferruginous layer21,22, and a negative excursion in δ13C (ref.23). We found a nickel anomaly of 85 ppm just below the iron-rich layer, over a background of 25 to 50 ppm (Fig. 2a). This suggests a worldwide distribution of the nickel, as India was in the Southern Hemisphere at the time. In these sections, Cr, V and Co also show elevated concentrations at the Ni peak, suggesting deposition under anoxic conditions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Nickel concentrations at the end of the Permian as determined by ICP-MS analyses by the authors. C marks the position of the end-Permian negative shift in δ13C. (a) Spiti, India (zero marks the latest Permian extinction layer just below the iron-rich layer and the negative shift in δ13C) (4 pts.); (b) Bukk Mountains, Hungary (zero marks the latest Permian extinction layer and the negative shift in δ13C) (9 pts.); and (c) Sasayama, Japan (zero marks the latest Permian extinction level, and the transition from radiolarian chert to black mudstone) (7 pts.). No carbon-isotope data are available for this section (see text for details).

Nickel anomalies and the Siberian Traps

The Ni increases are interpreted here as reflecting input from volcanic activity of the Siberian Traps24, with volatile plumes that may have exhibited a Ni-rich signature25,26. The nickel-rich intrusions associated with the Siberian Traps eruptions contain some of the largest deposits of that metal in the world. The release of nickel-rich volatiles is supported by the fact that some Siberian basaltic flows are depleted in Ni and PGEs25. This may be a function of segregation of co-existing sulfide liquids in the magma chamber. The sulfides become enriched in the metals, while the silicate magma left behind is depleted in PGEs and Ni. Sulfur volatiles, along with the trace metals would be released in the explosive volcanic plumes26,27. Models suggest that explosive gas emissions from the Siberian Traps26, and from reactions between related nickel-rich intrusions and coal deposits5, could have had a global, though irregular distribution4. Widespread dissemination of the volcanic emissions is also supported by the presence of mercury28, and fly ash29, inferred to be from coal combustion in Siberia, in Permian-Triassic boundary sections far from the eruption site.

Platinum group elements

Platinum group elements are also somewhat elevated near the P-T boundary. The nickel abundance anomaly at Spiti is associated with a small iridium anomaly (73 ppt) in the ferruginous layer marking the P-T boundary, and another small iridium anomaly (110 ppt) has been detected 70 cm below that layer21. A similar double iridium anomaly bracketing the Permian-Triassic boundary is found in the GK-1 core30. In that core, the iridium peaks of 165 and 230 ppt, coincide with the two Ni-rich layers, and with two negative δ13C anomalies, separated by an estimated 300 to 400 kyr (ref.31) (Fig. 1). In a study of osmium-isotopes in the GK-1 core, Koeberl et al.32 confirmed that these PGE anomalies are most likely terrestrial, not cosmic, in origin. The elevated platinum group metals at the P-T boundary have been attributed to emissions from the Siberian Traps33 and such relatively small iridium anomalies could be created by volcanic plumes somewhat enriched in iridium34,35.

Nickel anomalies and isotope shifts

The Ni anomalies are correlated with negative shifts in carbon isotopes in carbonates and organic carbon. These negative δ13C anomalies may partly reflect massive releases of light 12C (possibly as methane) into the atmosphere, from reactions of magmatic intrusions with carbon-rich sediments26,36. It has also been suggested that additional methane came from the successful evolution and rapid expansion of certain methanogenic archaea (e.g., Methanosarcina) in the latest Permian seas, driven in part by the increased availability of dissolved nickel in the oceans (which is necessary for methanogenic activities)7,37. Negative shifts in δ18O at the same time may indicate methane-greenhouse driven increases in global surface temperatures (increases estimated at 8°C) (refs38,39). The nickel anomalies may also provide a timeline for correlating the various Permian-Triassic boundary sections.

Furthermore, residence times of volcanogenic methane in the atmosphere and oceans could have been enhanced in the latest Permian. In the modern ocean, the major sinks for methane are reaction with dissolved oxygen, and anaerobic oxidation by sulfate. In the latest Permian, it seems that large portions of the oceans were anoxic or dysoxic (reflected in widespread deposition of organic-rich sediments)14,40,41, and atmospheric oxygen is reported to have been less than 16% (ref.42). Oceanic sulfate may have been reduced as a result of the widespread formation of pyrite in the anoxic marine environments43. Thus, the decrease of the two major oxidants in seawater (oxygen and sulfate), would have decreased aerobic and anaerobic CH4 oxidation, and allowed for the enhanced accumulation of CH4 in the oceans and atmosphere, contributing to the observed severe global warming at the time of the latest Permian extinction38,39.

Methods

Sample preparation and analyses were performed at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. Samples were powdered using a ball mill with alumina vessels. Precisely weighed sample powders were dissolved at 175 °C in Savillex Teflon beakers on the hotplate in a PicoTrace ® ultra clean laboratory with a mixture of ultrapure nitric, hydrofluoric and perchloric acids. After overnight heating, additional perchloric acid was added if any dark precipitates were observed, which could indicate un-dissolved organic matter. After all sample powders have fully reacted with the acids, the solution was evaporated to dryness at 200 °C in a laminar flow dry-down box. The samples were re-dissolved in nitric acid and evaporated again to convert insoluble fluorides into soluble nitrates. Millipore water was used to rinse perchloric acid condensates down from the inside walls of the beakers, and the resulting slurry was evaporated until the samples dried to flat cakes, and no perchloric acid condensates were observed in the beakers. Finally, 4 N nitric acid was added to the samples to generate a clear solution with no observable precipitates.

Following dissolution, the samples, procedural blanks and international standards, were diluted 2,000 times using 3% nitric acid spiked with 1ppb Indium (In), and analyzed for elemental concentrations using a VG-ExCell® quadrupole ICP-MS. In-run oxide formation was monitored using CeO/Ce, and maintained below 3%. Interference of BaO ions on Eu is corrected using the observed correlation between 153Eu and 137Ba measured on pure Ba solutions, during the same run session. Drift corrections were made based on repeated measurements of a drift solution mixed from representative sample solutions. After external drift correction, a secondary internal drift correction was applied using In. Final elemental concentrations are determined using the standard addition method. One SD relative uncertainties for all elements are better than 2%. While procedural blanks are generally below 2%, the minimum counts for 6 procedural blank solutions were subtracted from the raw counts of the unknowns.

Electronic supplementary material

Dataset 1 (144KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Bhandari for the supplying the Spiti, India samples; J. Hanley and A. Corley for sample preparation and training of E.B. in the lab; and L. Bolge for assistance in ICP-MS analyses. Y. Miura, and M. Miono helped in the field in Japan. Conversations with Y. Eshet were helpful in interpreting the Israel section. J. Deutscher prepared the figures. The research made use of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory/American Museum of Natural History ICP-MS facilities. This research was funded by a Research Challenge Grant from New York University (M.R.R), by grants from Barnard College (S.R., E.B.) and a research grant from the Climate Center (Y.C.).

Author Contributions

M.R.R. conceived the study, provided the samples, interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. S.R. prepared samples for analysis and interpreted data. Y.C. and E.B. performed the analyses and interpreted data. All authors revised and approved the manuscr.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-12759-9.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Erwin, D. H. Extinction: How Life on Earth Nearly Ended 250 Million Years Ago. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006).
  • 2.Kaiho K, Chen ZQ, Sawada K. Possible causes for a negative shift in the stable carbon isotope ratio before, during and after the end-Permian mass extinction in Meishan, South China. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2009;56:799–808. doi: 10.1080/08120090903002615. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Korte C, et al. Massive volcanism at the Permian-Triassic boundary and its impact on the isotopic composition of the ocean and atmosphere. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2010;37:293–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iacon-Marziano G, et al. Gas emissions due to magma-sediment interactions during flood magmatism at the Siberian Traps: Gas dispersion and environmental consequences. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2012;357-358:308–318. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.09.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ogden DE, Sleep NH. Explosive eruption of coal and basalt and the end-Permian extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2012;109:59–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118675109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaiho K, et al. End-Permian catastrophe by a bolide impact: Evidence of a gigantic release of sulfur from the mantle. Geology. 2001;29:815–818. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0815:EPCBAB>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rothman DH, et al. Methanogenic burst in the end-Permian carbon cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2014;111:5462–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318106111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xiang L, et al. Oceanic redox evolution across the end-Permian mass extinction at Shangsi, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology. Palaeoecology. 2016;448:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.10.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sandler A, Eshet Y, Schilman B. Evidence for a fungal event, methane hydrate release and soil erosion at the Permian-Triassic boundary in southern Israel. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2006;241:68–89. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dolenec T, Lojen S, Ramovs A. The Permian-Triassic boundary in Western Slovenia (Idrijca Valley section): magnetostratigraphy, stable isotopes, and elemental variations. Chemical Geology. 2001;175:175–190. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00368-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grasby SE, et al. Progressive environmental deterioration in northwestern Pangea leading to the latest Permian extinction. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 2015;127:1331–1347. doi: 10.1130/B31197.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Attrep M, Orth CJ, Quintana LR., Jr. The Permian-Triassic of the Gartnerkoefel-1 core (Carnic Alps, Austria): Geochemistry of common and trace elements II—INAA and RNAA. Abhandlung der Geologischen Bundesanstalt. 1991;45:123–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boudreau BP. Is burial velocity a master parameter for bioturbation? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1994;58:1243–1249. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90378-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Isozaki Y. Permo-Triassic boundary superanoxia and stratified superocean: records from lost deep sea. Science. 1997;276:235–238. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5310.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu S-A, et al. Zinc isotope evidence for intensive magmatism immediately before the end-Permian extinction. Geology. 2017;45:343–346. doi: 10.1130/G38644.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamakita S, et al. Confirmation of the Permian/Triassic boundary in deep-sea sedimentary rocks: earliest Triassic conodonts from black carbonaceous claystone of the Ubara section in the Tamba Belt, Southwestern Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan. 1999;105:895–898. doi: 10.5575/geosoc.105.895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sano H, Wada T, Naraoka H. Late Permian to Early Triassic environmental changes in the Panthalassic Ocean: Record from seamount-associated deep-marine rocks, central Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2012;363-364:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.07.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kakuwa Y. Permian-Triassic mass extinction event recorded in bedded chert sequence in southwest Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 1996;121:35–51. doi: 10.1016/0031-0182(95)00070-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haas J, et al. Biotic and environmental changes in the Permian-Triassic boundary interval recorded on a western Tethys ramp in the Bukk Mountains, Hungary. Global and Planetary Change. 2007;55:136–154. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haas J, et al. Carbon isotope excursions and microfacies changes in marine Permian-Triassic boundary sections in Hungary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2006;237:160–181. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.11.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bhandari N, Shukla PN, Azmi RJ. Positive Europium anomaly at the Permo-Triassic boundary, Spiti, India. Geophysical Research Letters. 1992;19:1531–1534. doi: 10.1029/92GL01071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shukla AD, et al. Chemical signatures of the Permian-Triassic transitional environment in Spiti valley, India. Geological Society of America Special Paper. 2002;356:445–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghosh P, et al. Negative δ13C excursion and anoxia at the Permo-Triassic boundary in the Tethys Sea. Current Science. 2002;83:498–502. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reichow MK, et al. The timing and extent of the eruption of the Siberian Traps large igneous province: Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2009;277:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brugmann GE, et al. Siderophile and chalcophile metals as tracers of the evolution of the Siberian Trap in the Noril’sk region, Russia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1993;57:2001–2018. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90089-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Svensen H, et al. Siberian gas venting and the end-Permian environmental crisis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2009;277:490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walker RJ, et al. Re-Os isotopic evidence for an enriched mantle source for the Noril’sk-type, ore-bearing intrusions, Siberia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1994;58:4179–4197. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90272-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grasby SE, et al. Mercury deposition through the Permo-Triassic biotic crisis. Chemical Geology. 2013;351:209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Grasby SE, Sanei H, Beauchamp B. Catastrophic dispersion of coal fly ash into oceans during the latest Permian extinction. Nature Geoscience. 2011;4:104–107. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holser WT, Schonlaub HP, Boeckelmann K, Magaritz M. The Permian-Triassic of the Gartnerkoefel-1 core (Carnic Alps, Austria): Synthesis and conclusions. Abhandlung der Geologischen Bundesanstalt. 1991;45:213–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rampino MR, Prokoph A, Adler AC, Schwindt DM. Abruptness of the end-Permian mass extinction as determined from biostratigraphic and cyclostratigraphic analyses of European western Tethys sections. Geological Society of America Special Paper. 2002;356:415–427. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Koeberl C, Farley KA, Peucker-Ehrenbrink B, Sephton MA. Geochemistry of the end-Permian extinction event in Austria and Italy: No evidence for an extraterrestrial component. Geology. 2004;32:1053–1056. doi: 10.1130/G20907.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu L, et al. Platinum-group elements of the Meishan Permian-Triassic boundary section: Evidence for flood basalt volcanism. Chemical Geology. 2007;246:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.08.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Olmez I, Finnegan DL, Zoller WH. Iridium emissions from Kilauea volcano. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1986;912:653–663. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB01p00653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Toutain J-P, Meyer G. Iridium-bearing sublimates at a hot-spot volcano (Piton de la Fournaise, Indian Ocean) Geophysical Research Letters. 1989;16:1391–1394. doi: 10.1029/GL016i012p01391. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Heydari E, Arzani N, Hassanzadeh J. Mantle plume: The invisible serial killer—Application to the Permian-Triassic boundary mass extinction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2008;264:147–162. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kornhauser KO, et al. The Archean nickel famine revisited. Astrobiology. 2015;15:804–815. doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Joachimski MM, et al. Climate warming in the latest Permian and the Permian- Triassic mass extinction. Geology. 2012;40:195–198. doi: 10.1130/G32707.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stordal F, et al. Global temperature response to century-scale degassing from the Siberian Traps large igneous province. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology. Palaeoecology. 2017;471:96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grice K, et al. Photic zone euxinia during the Permian-Triassic superanoxic event. Science. 2005;307:706–709. doi: 10.1126/science.1104323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li G, et al. Fluctuations of redox conditions across the Permian-Triassic boundary—New evidence from the GSSP section in Meishan of South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2016;448:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.09.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huey RB, Ward PD. Hypoxia, global warming, and terrestrial Late Permian extinctions. Science. 2005;308:398–401. doi: 10.1126/science.1108019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Luo G, et al. Evidence for an anomalously low sulfate concentration following end-Permian mass extinction. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2010;300:101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.09.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Dataset 1 (144KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES