Abstract
Macrophages are central to inflammatory response and become polarized towards the M1 or M2 states upon activation by immunostimulants. In this study, we investigated the effects of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and interleukin (IL)-17A on the activation of macrophages in in vivo mouse skin. We examined whether macrophages are activated in the skin of imiquimod (IMQ)-treated mice, a model for IL-17A-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation, and flaky-tail (Flg ft) mice, a model for IL-17A-induced chronic atopic dermatitis-like skin inflammation. LPS and IL-17A independently increased the expression levels of iNOS, CX3CR1, CD206, phospho-STAT1 and phospho-STAT3 proteins in the skin of B6 mice, and the effects of LPS was not altered by IL-17A. The expression levels of these proteins were increased in the skin of IMQ-treated and Flg ft mice. IL-17A neutralization increased the expressions of iNOS and phospho-STAT1 in the IMQ-treated skin, but it decreased the expressions of CD206 and phospho-STAT3 proteins in the skin of Flg ft mice, suggesting that macrophages to change from the M2 to the M1 state in the skin of these mice. These results suggest that IL-17A is involved in the activation of macrophages that are in the process of adopting the heterogeneous profiles of both the M1 and M2 states.
Introduction
In skin, various immune cells are activated by invading pathogens or skin damage. Macrophages are vital to innate immunity, and their activation leads to an increased capacity to regulate other cells through the release of cytokines and chemokines that is induced in adaptive immunity1. Persistent macrophage activity results in the development of chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD)2. Abnormal immune conditions of tissues affects the activation and plasticity/polarization of macrophages (i.e. their maturation towards the M1 or M2 state)3. The classical pathway is defined as the interferon (IFN)-γ-dependent activation of M1 type macrophages by T helper 1 (Th1)-type responses. The alternative pathway is defined as the M2 type macrophage activation by Th2-type cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13. However, recent studies have shown that the macrophage lineages are diverse and heterogeneous as demonstrated by the presence of unique M1/M2 heterogeneous macrophages in IL-17 immunity.
IL-17 family members play an active role in inflammatory diseases and autoimmune diseases4. IL-17A is the prototype pro-inflammatory cytokine of the IL-17 family5, which is largely produced by activated memory T lymphocytes, and functions to stimulate innate immunity. A well-known IL-17A-related skin disease is psoriasis. The association between IL-17A and psoriasis is well established in humans, mouse and in vitro models6. The roles of IL-17A are also implicated in the pathogenesis of AD7,8. IL-17A is highly expressed in flaky-tail (Flg ft) mouse, a murine AD model, that carries mutations in the filaggrin gene9,10. Moreover, IL-17A is involved in infectious, inflammatory, neutrophilic, granulomatous, bullous and malignant skin diseases11. However, there are few reports regarding the direct effects of IL-17A on the macrophage function in the skin.
To clarify whether macrophages act as effectors of Th17 immunity, we investigated the effects of IL-17A injection on the macrophage activation in the skin of B6 wild-type mice. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) is known to activate macrophages via Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) related classical pathway. IL-17A in addition to LPS enhances proinflammatory cytokine expression in human carotid plaques, suggesting the synergistic effects of IL-17A and LPS on macrophage activation12. However, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which could be elevated in IL-17A-induced inflammation condition, induces a tolerant state in macrophages with less cytokine production by LPS13. These reports lead us to investigate an additive effect of LPS on the IL-17A-mediated inflammatory condition in in vivo skin.
Next, we examined whether macrophages are activated in the skin of a murine psoriasis model (imiquimod (IMQ)-treated mouse) and a murine AD model (Flg ft mouse), and we examined the effects of LPS on macrophage activations in these model mice. We also treated these model mice with IL-17A neutralization.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies
The anti-F4/80 antibody was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). The anti-iNOS antibody was purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories (San Jose, CA, USA), Thermo Scientific (Fremont, CA, USA) or Abcam (Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, UK). CX3CR1 was obtained from Bioss (Woburn, Massachusetts, USA). CD68 was obtained from Abcam and CD206 from Bioss, BIO-RAD (Hercules, CA, California) or R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Antibodies against phospho-STAT1, STAT1, phospho-STAT3, STAT3 and β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).
Mice and Treatments
All animal experiments and methods were approved by the Kagawa University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were handled in compliance with the guidelines for conducting Animal Experiments at Kagawa University. The Flg ft mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME USA), and the C57BL/6 J (B6) mice were obtained from CLEA Japan (Megro, Tokyo, Japan). The Flg ft mice were backcrossed three generations into a B6 strain background. The mice were housed in a SPF facility at the Health Science Center of Kagawa University under controlled temperature (23 °C) and humidity (55%). The mice were given food and water ad libitum (MF: Oriental Yeast Co., Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan). Mouse IL-17A (ProSpec, East Brunswick, NJ, USA) was administered intraperitoneally (0.25 μg) once a day for a week or subcutaneously (3 μg) in the skin of B6 mice once 24 hours before LPS injection. A daily topical dose of 60 mg of commercially available IMQ cream (5%) (Beselna Cream®; Mochida Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to the shaved back skin once a day for a week. Mouse anti-mouse IL-17A antibody (clone: 17F3; Bio X Cell, West Lebanon, NH, USA) was administered intraperitoneally (50 μg) once a day for a week. LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, 0.1 mg) was injected subcutaneously into the dorsal area of the mice. Six hours later, the mice were sacrificed by intraperitoneal sodium pentobarbital (1 g/kg) injection, and the full thickness sections of the dorsal skin were subsequently dissected. Mice were sacrificed within 5–12 weeks in age. Groups of four to six mice were used in each experiment. Each experiment was repeated a minimum of two times.
Immunohistochemical analysis
Skin samples (1–2 cm2) that were removed from the mid-dorsum of mice were directly fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Tissues were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin prior to cutting 2–5-μm thick sections. The samples were subsequently deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated and immunostained with primary antibodies (1:200 dilution) using the Histofine simple stain reagent (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating the sections with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min. After a wash with PBS, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h, washed in PBS and subsequently incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. After wash, sections were incubated in a 3–3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride solution and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. The number of positively stained cells was counted in 4 different high-power fields (HPF; ×400).
Human atopic dermatitis and psoriasis samples
All human specimens and all experimental protocols were studied after approval by the Kagawa University and University of Chicago Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were obtained from the tissue bank archives at the Kagawa University. AD and psoriasis specimens were used for immunohistochemical analysis of CD68, CD206 and iNOS protein expression. TripleStain IHC kit (Abcam) was utilized to examine the colocalization of CD206 and iNOS protein.
Immunofluorescence microscopy on frozen tissue sections
Frozen tissue sections (30 µm) were cut and placed onto Superfrost plus slides. Sections were pre-blocked in a solution containing 1% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1% gelatin in PBS. Primary antibodies (1:200 dilution) were then added to a fresh solution and incubated with the samples at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the slides 3 times with PBS for 10 min each, the sections were incubated with fresh solution containing secondary FITC-conjugated antibodies (1:400 dilution) or Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated antibodies (1:400 dilution) for 30 min before washing and mounting. Nuclei were stained with TO-PRO-3. Sections were examined using a confocal microscope (LSM 700; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Thüringen, Germany).
Western blot analysis
Skin tissue specimens were homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer in RIPA buffer containing 1% v/v NP40, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.7), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and a mixture of protease inhibitors (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA). After incubation at 4 °C for 20 min, the samples were sonicated on ice and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The protein concentration of the supernatants was analyzed using the BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). An equal amount of protein was separated on reducing NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris or 7% Tris-acetate gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Alternatively, the protein was separated on SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was then probed with primary antibodies. Membrane-bound primary antibodies were visualized using the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and a chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The immunoreactive signals from the chemiluminescent substrate were visualized by exposure to standard X-ray films. Images were subjected to densitometric analysis using the Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the skin tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed using a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the Taqman gene expression assay system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The following probes were used: Mm0045259_m1 (IL-4), Mm00446190_m1 (IL-6), Mm01288386_m1 (IL-10), Mm00434204_m1 (IL-13), Mm00439618_m1 (IL-17a), Mm01160011_g1 (IL-23), Mm00439552_s1 (IFN-β), Mm01168134_m1 (IFN-γ), Mm00443258_m1 (TNF-α), Mm00436450_m1 (CXCL2), and Mm99999915_g1 (GAPDH). Probes for GAPDH were used as an endogenous control. Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system. Gene expression values were calculated based on the comparative threshold cycle method, normalized to GAPDH expression, and displayed as a fold induction relative to the control.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. Statistical analysis was performed by an analysis of variance followed by Mann-Whitney’s U-test. P-values of <0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Treatment with subcutaneous IL-17A injection activated macrophages in the skin of B6 mice
To test the hypothesis that IL-17A activates resident macrophages, we injected IL-17A only or in combination with subsequent LPS subcutaneously (Fig. 1A). LPS significantly increased the number of iNOS+, CX3CR1+ and CD206+ cells in the skin of B6 mice (Fig. 1B,C). Furthermore, the protein expression levels of iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 increased after LPS injection (Fig. 1D,E). LPS also increased the expression levels of both STAT1 and STAT3 and their phosphorylation (Fig. 1F,G,H) in the mouse skin tissue. Subcutaneous local IL-17A injection significantly increased the number of F4/80+ cells, suggesting an increase in the number of matured resident macrophages (Fig. 1B,C). Furthermore, the number of iNOS+, CX3CR1+, and CD206+ cells increased in the skin of IL-17A-treated B6 mice (Fig. 1B,C). The protein expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 in the mouse skin tissue were also elevated after the subcutaneous injection of IL-17A (Fig. 1D,E). Both STAT1 and STAT3 are phosphorylated in the F4/80+ cells of the IL-17A-injected mouse skin (Fig. 1F). The expression levels of both STAT1 and STAT3 and their phosphorylation were increased in the IL-17A-injected mouse skin tissue (Fig. 1G,H).
Subcutaneous local IL-17A did not alter the effects of LPS on macrophage activation. These results suggest that subcutaneous local IL-17A and LPS non-redundantly activated skin macrophages into the M1/M2 heterogeneous phenotype.
Treatment with systemic IL-17A-activated macrophages in the skin of B6 mice
To determine the effects of systemic IL-17A on macrophages in the skin, we treated the B6 mice with a daily intraperitoneal IL-17A injection for a week and examined whether the macrophages were activated in the skin (Fig. 2A). Intraperitoneal systemic IL-17A injection significantly increased the number of F4/80+, iNOS+, CX3CR1+ and CD206+ cells (Fig. 2B,C) and their respective protein expression in the mouse skin tissue (Fig. 2D,E). Both STAT1 and STAT3 were phosphorylated in the F4/80+ cells of the mouse skin by intraperitoneal IL-17A injection (Fig. 2F). Systemic IL-17A increased the expression levels of both STAT1 and STAT3 and their phosphorylation in the mouse skin tissue (Fig. 2G,H). Systemic IL-17A did not alter the effects of LPS on macrophage activation. These results suggest that long-term treatment with systemic IL-17A also activates macrophages in the skin of B6 mice in a different way from the LPS-induced macrophage activation.
Macrophages were activated in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice
To determine whether macrophages are activated in the skin of psoriasis, we treated mouse skin with topical IMQ to induce transient psoriatic skin inflammation that is heavily dependent on IL-17 immunity (Fig. 3A)14. The protein expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 increased, and the number of F4/80+, iNOS+, CX3CR1+ and CD206+ cells markedly increased in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice (Fig. 3B–E). Both STAT1 and STAT3 were phosphorylated in the F4/80+ cells of the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice (Fig. 3F). Both STAT1 and STAT3 proteins were increased and phosphorylated in the IMQ-treated skin tissue of B6 mice (Fig. 3G,H). These results suggest that macrophages are spontaneously activated in the skin of murine psoriasis models.
IL-17A neutralization increased the protein expression levels of iNOS in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice
To determine whether the suppression of IL-17A can affect the phenotype of macrophages, we treated the B6 mice with IMQ and anti-IL-17A antibody for a week (Fig. 3A). Treatment with anti-IL-17A antibody did not alter the number of F4/80+, iNOS+, CX3CR1+ and CD206+ cells in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice (Fig. 3B,C). Although the protein expression levels of F4/80, CX3CR1 and CD206 were not altered, the protein expression levels of iNOS were increased in the mouse skin tissue (Fig. 3D,E). Furthermore, anti-IL-17A antibody treatment increased the activation of STAT1 in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice, but it did not alter the activation of STAT3 (Fig. 3G,H). We examined proinflammatory and proresolving mediators that may alter the macrophage phenotype in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice. The expression levels of IL-6, IL-17A, IL-23, IFN-β, TNF-α and CXCL2 were increased in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice (Fig. 4). After treatment with anti-IL-17A antibodies, the expression levels of IL-23 and CXCL2 were decreased in the IMQ-treated skin of B6 mice. These results suggest that the IMQ-induced modification of the macrophage phenotype is mostly independent of IL-17A itself in the skin of mice.
Macrophages were activated in the skin of Flgft mice
Flg ft mouse is a murine model for AD that has IL-17-dependent chronic skin inflammation. The protein expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 increased, and the number of F4/80+, iNOS+, CX3CR1+ and CD206+ cells is markedly increased in the skin of Flg ft mice (Fig. 5A–E). STAT1 was only weakly phosphorylated, and STAT3 was only modestly phosphorylated in the F4/80+ cells of the skin of Flg ft mice (Fig. 5F). STAT1 protein was increased and slightly phosphorylated, and STAT3 protein was increased and phosphorylated in the skin tissue of Flg ft mice (Fig. 5G,H). The LPS-induced macrophage activation was not deranged in the skin of Flg ft mice. These results suggest that macrophages are spontaneously activated in the skin of a murine AD model in a different way from the LPS-induced macrophage activation.
IL-17A neutralization decreased the protein expression levels of CD206 in the skin of Flgft mice
To determine whether the inhibition of IL-17A affects the phenotype of macrophages, we treated the Flg ft mice with anti-IL-17A antibody for a week. Treatment with anti-IL-17A antibody did not decrease the number of F4/80+, iNOS+, CX3CR1+ and CD206+ cells in the skin of Flg ft mice (Fig. 6B,C). Although the protein expression levels of F4/80, iNOS and CX3CR1 were not altered, the protein expression levels of CD206 were suppressed (Fig. 6D,E). Anti-IL-17A antibody treatment did not alter the activation of STAT1, but it reduced the activation of STAT3 in the skin of Flg ft mice (Fig. 6F,G,H). Although not statistically significant, anti-IL-17A moderately reduced the activation of STAT3 in the skin of LPS-injected Flg ft mice. We examined proinflammatory and proresolving mediators that may alter the macrophage phenotype in the skin of Flg ft mice. The expression levels of IL-6, IL-17A, IL-23 and CXCL2 were increased, and the expression levels of IL-10 and IFN-β were decreased in the skin of Flg ft mice (Fig. 7). After treatment with anti-IL-17A antibodies, the expression levels of IL-6, IL-13, IL-23 and CXCL2 were decreased in the skin of Flg ft mice (Fig. 7). These results suggest that the deranged phenotype of macrophage is mostly independent of IL-17A itself in the skin of Flg ft mice.
iNOS- and CD206-expressing cells in the dermis of psoriasis and AD patients
To determine the relevance of the effects of IL-17A in human skin diseases, we evaluated iNOS- and CD206-expressing cells in human psoriasis and AD samples. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed the presence of both iNOS- and CD206-expressing cells in the dermis of psoriasis and AD patients. Some CD206-expressing cells were positive for CD68 and iNOS (Fig. 8).
Discussion
IL-17 is a key mediator in inflammatory skin diseases. Since macrophages are involved in the IL-17-induced inflammation, we examined the effects of IL-17A on the expression of macrophage activation markers in the skin of mice. Local treatment with subcutaneous injection or systemic treatment with intraperitoneal injection of IL-17A increased the expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 proteins in the skin of B6 mice. IL-17A activated both STAT1 and STAT3 in macrophages in the skin of B6 mice. Likewise, the expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 increased and both STAT1 and STAT3 were activated in the IMQ-treated skin and the skin of Flg ft mice. IL-17A neutralization increased iNOS expression and enhanced phosphorylation of STAT1 in the IMQ-treated skin, but it partially decreased CD206 protein expression and prevented phosphorylation of STAT3 in the skin of Flg ft mice. No synergistic effects or cross-inhibition of IL-17A and LPS on macrophage activation was observed in the skin of mouse. In the human skin, iNOS+ and CD206+ macrophages existed in the dermis of psoriasis and AD patients.
Common terms in macrophage phenotyping are ‘classically activated M1 macrophages’ and ‘alternatively activated M2 macrophages’. The F4/80 antigen is a mature mouse cell surface glycoprotein that is highly expressed in macrophages15 and can be expressed by both M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages express iNOS and CX3CR1, and M2 macrophages express CD20616. These protein expressions are accompanied by the activation of STAT proteins in macrophages. In general, STAT1 is activated in response to M1-polarizing signals (IL-23, IFN-β and IFN-γ) whereas STAT3 is activated by M2–polarizing signals (IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13) in macrophage17,18. LPS, the major structural component of the outer wall of Gram-negative bacteria, is a potent activator of macrophages. It was shown that LPS generated free radicals via iNOS and xanthine oxidase in the skin of mice19. In this study, we showed that macrophages in the skin of mice were activated by LPS treatment, suggesting that the main source of free radicals is produced from iNOS expressed by LPS-activated macrophages. In general, LPS activates macrophages by TLR4 signaling to direct the macrophage towards the M1 phenotype16. However, LPS is known to induce type 2 cytokines, such as IL-6, in macrophages20. It is possible that LPS polarizes macrophages directly M1 toward and indirectly M2 toward via IL-6 in the skin of mice. Therefore, it may be reasonable that LPS induced both M1- and M2-related protein expressions in the skin of B6 wild-type mice in our study. A previous report demonstrated synergistic or cross-tolerant effects of IL-17A and LPS on macrophage activation12,13. In addition, cross-inhibition of STAT3 between IL-6 and IL10 was reported21. Thus, cross talk among different signaling pathways was proposed to affect macrophage phenotype in the skin of mouse. However, our results suggest that IL-17A did not alter the effects of LPS on the heterogeneous macrophage activation in the skin of mouse. These discrepancies may depend on experimental conditions: in vitro or in vivo, tissue type, dose of LPS, and treatment duration of LPS. Since a maximum dose of LPS was injected according to the previous reports, final conclusion needs further investigations.
Although the phenotypic and functional diversity of the macrophage lineages are becoming widely recognized22, there is little known regarding their phenotype in IL-17A-mediated inflammation. A previous report demonstrated the direct activation of macrophage by IL-17A23, but macrophage differentiation is mainly regulated by T cell-derived cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13. In our study, both M1 and M2 macrophage-related proteins were induced by IL-17A. In vivo IL-17A-induced inflammation may directly and indirectly involve the activations of these STAT proteins in macrophages. Previous reports demonstrated that IL-17A activated both STAT1 and STAT3 in human monocytic leukemia cells and keratinocytes and human keratinocytes24,25, implying that IL-17A can induce M1 and M2 macrophage-related proteins via direct activation of both STAT1 and STAT3 in the skin of mouse. On the other hand, IL-17A is known to act on a variety of in vivo cells and enhance both M1 macrophage-polarizing signal (IFN-γ) and M2 macrophage –polarizing signal (IL-6)26. These inflammatory cytokines could concomitantly activate both STAT1 and STAT3 in the macrophages. Previous studies outside the dermatological fields have demonstrated the controversial effects of IL-17 on macrophages. IL-17 expression was shown to increase the M1/M2 macrophage ratio at the local mucosal site of both murine and human bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw lesion27. IL-17 induced an atypical M2-like macrophage to regulate intestinal inflammation28 but it induced an M1-like phenotype in in vitro human macrophages12. IL-17A monoclonal antibody treatment prevented the progression of advanced atherosclerotic lesions and induced plaque stability in mice by interfering with the activity of macrophages12. The direct treatment of in vitro mouse macrophages with IL-17A induced unique cytokine profiles that included GM-CSF, IL-3, IL-9, CCL4/MIP1β, CCL5/RANTES and IL-12p7023. The induction of IL12p70 favors the induction of Th1 differentiation in response to transgenic CD4+ T cells. These macrophage-derived cytokines may interfere with the M1/M2 macrophages ratio by an autocrine signaling pathway. Thus, the phenotype of macrophages under the influence of IL-17A may depend on the environment of the organ or tissue. We have shown for the first time that IL-17A induced M1/M2 heterogenous macrophages in the skin of mouse.
IMQ-induced skin inflammation mimics the symptoms of psoriasis such as skin thickening, scaling, erythema and microabscesses29. Topical application of IMQ activates TLR 7/8 of Th17 cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells and γδT cells to produce IL-17A30,31. We demonstrated that macrophages were activated in the IMQ-treated skin of mice. The direct activation of macrophages via TLR 7/8 by IMQ, a primary innate immune mechanism, occurs within 3–5 days after IMQ application. However, 7 days of consecutive application may elicit the cycle of antigen transport to drain the lymph nodes, promote antigen-presenting T-cell interactions, induce clonal expansion, and stimulate Th17 cells migration towards the damaged skin tissue. Thus, our data suggest that adaptive Th17 immunity contributes to the activation of macrophages in IMQ-induced skin inflammation. In our study, the protein expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206 were elevated in the IMQ-induced skin of mice. Furthermore, both STAT1 and STAT3 were activated in the skin of these mice. These results suggest that macrophages with a heterogeneous M1/M2 phenotype were activated in the IMQ-treated skin of adaptive Th17-induced inflammation. Morimura et al. also recently reported that CX3CR1+ macrophages were partially involved in the IMQ-induced skin inflammation32, suggesting the importance of macrophage activity in this psoriasis mouse model.
We used Flg ft mice as a model for IL-17A-induced chronic skin inflammation. Flg ft mice arose spontaneously in 1958 at the Jackson Laboratory and were first reported in 197233. A filaggrin deficiency in their epidermis was discovered in 2000 that were due to mutations in the filaggrin and matted genes9,34,35. Filaggrin deficiency causes the disruption of skin barrier functions36 and induces AD-like immune responses in the skin of Flg ft mice37. Human AD is classically characterized by a Th2-dominant condition. However, it has been reported that levels of IL-17A, but not IL-4 and IL-13, is elevated in the skin of Flg ft mice38. Thus, Flg ft mice have been used to investigate the effects of IL-17A in skin inflammation10. In our study, in addition to the elevated protein expression levels of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206, both STAT1 and STAT3 were activated in the skin of Flg ft mice. These results suggest that the activated macrophages had a M1/M2 heterogeneous phenotype in the skin of AD.
Real-time RT-PCR analysis indicated that the expression levels of IL-6, IL-17A, IL-23 and CXCL2 were elevated in the IMQ-treated skin and the skin of Flg ft mice. IL-23 promotes the development of an IL-17-producing CD4+ T cell subset39. Since IL-17A appeared to be a downstream factor of IL-23, we examined the effects of IL-17A on macrophages in the skin of B6 wild-type mice. Both intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injection of IL-17A induced the protein expression of F4/80, iNOS, CX3CR1 and CD206. Furthermore, STAT1 was slightly activated and STAT3 was markedly activated in the IL-17A-treated skin of B6 mice, mimicking the IMQ-treated skin and the skin of Flg ft mice. IL-17A neutralization suppressed the expression of IL-17A, IL-23 and CXCL2 in the IMQ-treated skin. On the contrary, in addition to suppressing the expression of IL-6, IL-13, IL-23 and CXCL2 in the skin of Flg ft mice, IL-17A neutralization reduced the LPS-induced IL-4 expression, normalized IL-23 expression and enhanced IFN-γ expression (data not shown). Along with the increase in iNOS protein expression and STAT1 phosphorylation in the skin of IMQ-treated mice or the decrease in CD206 protein expression and STAT3 dephosphorylation in the skin of Flg ft mice, IL-17A neutralization may shift macrophages from the M2 to the M1 phenotype in the skin of mouse. Moreover, these results suggest that IL-6 and IL-13 were important for activating STAT3 and M2-polarizing of the macrophages in the skin of mouse. The discrepant effects of IL-17A neutralization between IMQ-treated mice and Flg ft mice may be due to differences in the pathophysioloy of these models.
In human IL-17A-related skin diseases, such as psoriasis and AD, CD206 is a specific marker for mature macrophages in the skin. CD68+ and CD163+ macrophages express CD206 in the skin of AD40 and psoriasis patients41, respectively. We have demonstrated for the first time the presence of iNOS+ and CD206+ macrophages in the skin of patients with psoriasis and AD. However, correlations between mouse and human macrophages and their representative subtypes are poor and are major barriers to understanding human immunity42. Therefore, these results need to be further investigated in models that are more representative of the human physiology.
Our findings demonstrated the interactions between IL-17A signaling and inflammation-dependent regulation of macrophage function in the skin in vivo. We have provided evidence that there is a heterogeneous activation of macrophages in IL-17A-induced skin inflammation.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for scientific research for K. Nakai (15K09745) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan.
Author Contributions
Kozo Nakai Conception and design of the study. Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Drafting of the article. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. Final approval of the article. Yu-Ying He Conception and design of the study. Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Final approval of the article. Fumiko Nishiyama Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Fukiko Naruse Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Reiji Haba Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Yoshio Kushida Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Naomi Katsuki Analysis and interpretation of data. Collection and assembly of data. Tetsuya Moriue Conception and design of the study. Analysis and interpretation of data. Final approval of the article. Kozo Yoneda Conception and design of the study. Analysis and interpretation of data. Final approval of the article. Yasuo Kubota Conception and design of the study. Analysis and interpretation of data. Final approval of the article.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Janeway CA, Jr., Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:197–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Valledor AF, et al. Macrophage proinflammatory activation and deactivation: a question of balance. Adv Immunol. 2010;108:1–20. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380995-7.00001-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(1):23–25. doi: 10.1038/nri978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kolls JK, Linden A. Interleukin-17 family members and inflammation. Immunity. 2004;21(4):467–76. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aggarwal S, Gurney AL. IL-17: prototype member of an emerging cytokine family. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;71(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Speeckaert, R. et al. The many faces of interleukin-17 in inflammatory skin diseases. Br J Dermatol (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Toda M, et al. Polarized in vivo expression of IL-11 and IL-17 between acute and chronic skin lesions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(4):875–81. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koga C, et al. Possible pathogenic role of Th17 cells for atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(11):2625–30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fallon PG, et al. A homozygous frameshift mutation in the mouse Flg gene facilitates enhanced percutaneous allergen priming. Nat Genet. 2009;41(5):602–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakajima S, et al. IL-17A as an inducer for Th2 immune responses in murine atopic dermatitis models. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(8):2122–30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Speeckaert R, et al. The many faces of interleukin-17 in inflammatory skin diseases. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(5):892–901. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Erbel C, et al. IL-17A influences essential functions of the monocyte/macrophage lineage and is involved in advanced murine and human atherosclerosis. J Immunol. 2014;193(9):4344–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park SH, et al. Tumor necrosis factor induces GSK3 kinase-mediated cross-tolerance to endotoxin in macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(7):607–15. doi: 10.1038/ni.2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van der Fits L, et al. Imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice is mediated via the IL-23/IL-17 axis. J Immunol. 2009;182(9):5836–45. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Austyn JM, Gordon S. F4/80, a monoclonal antibody directed specifically against the mouse macrophage. Eur J Immunol. 1981;11(10):805–15. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830111013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(3):787–95. doi: 10.1172/JCI59643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bhattacharjee et al., IL-4 and IL-13 employ discrete signaling pathways for target gene expression in alternatively activated monocytes/macrophages. Free Radic Biol Med54, 1–16 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Tabas I, Bornfeldt KE. Macrophage Phenotype and Function in Different Stages of Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nakai K, et al. Free radical production requires both inducible nitric oxide synthase and xanthine oxidase in LPS-treated skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(12):4616–21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510352103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mukherjee S, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-driven Th2 cytokine production in macrophages is regulated by both MyD88 and TRAM. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(43):29391–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.005272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Niemand C, et al. Activation of STAT3 by IL-6 and IL-10 in primary human macrophages is differentially modulated by suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. J Immunol. 2003;170(6):3263. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958–69. doi: 10.1038/nri2448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barin JG, et al. Macrophages participate in IL-17-mediated inflammation. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(3):726–36. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Subramaniam SV, Cooper RS, Adunyah SE. Evidence for the involvement of JAK/STAT pathway in the signaling mechanism of interleukin-17. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;262(1):14. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shi X, et al. IL-17A upregulates keratin 17 expression in keratinocytes through STAT1- and STAT3-dependent mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(12):2401. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Onishi RM, Gaffen SL. Interleukin-17 and its target genes: mechanisms of interleukin-17 function in disease. Immunology. 2010;129(3):311. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Q, et al. IL-17-mediated M1/M2 macrophage alteration contributes to pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(12):3176–88. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nishikawa K, et al. Interleukin-17 induces an atypical M2-like macrophage subpopulation that regulates intestinal inflammation. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van der Fits L, et al. Imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation in mice is mediated via the IL-23/IL-17 axis. J Immunol. 2009;182(9):5836–45. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gilliet M, et al. Psoriasis triggered by toll-like receptor 7 agonist imiquimod in the presence of dermal plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(12):1490–5. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pantelyushin S, et al. Rorgammat + innate lymphocytes and gammadelta T cells initiate psoriasiform plaque formation in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(6):2252–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI61862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morimura S, Oka T, Sugaya M, Sato S. CX3CR1 deficiency attenuates imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation with decreased M1 macrophages. J Dermatol Sci. 2016;82(3):175–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lane PW. Two new mutations in linkage group XVI of the house mouse. Flaky tail and varitint-waddler-J. J Hered. 1972;63(3):135–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Presland RB, et al. Loss of normal profilaggrin and filaggrin in flaky tail (ft/ft) mice: an animal model for the filaggrin-deficient skin disease ichthyosis vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115(6):1072–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sasaki T, et al. A homozygous nonsense mutation in the gene for Tmem79, a component for the lamellar granule secretory system, produces spontaneous eczema in an experimental model of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(5):1111–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nakai K, et al. Reduced expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, E-cadherin, and occludin in the skin of flaky tail mice is due to filaggrin and loricrin deficiencies. Am J Pathol. 2012;181(3):969–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moniaga CS, et al. Flaky tail mouse denotes human atopic dermatitis in the steady state and by topical application with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(5):2385–93. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Oyoshi MK, Murphy GF, Geha RS. Filaggrin-deficient mice exhibit TH17-dominated skin inflammation and permissiveness to epicutaneous sensitization with protein antigen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(3):485–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Iwakura Y, Ishigame H. The IL-23/IL-17 axis in inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(5):1218–22. doi: 10.1172/JCI28508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kiekens RC, et al. Heterogeneity within tissue-specific macrophage and dendritic cell populations during cutaneous inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145(6):957–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fuentes-Duculan J, et al. A subpopulation of CD163-positive macrophages is classically activated in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(10):2412–22. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Obstacles and opportunities for understanding macrophage polarization. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89(4):557–63. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0710409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]