Abstract
Background & Aims
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is associated with intestinal dysbiosis and symptoms of IBS develop following gastroenteritis. We aimed to study passage of live bacteria through the colonic epithelium, and determine the role of mast cells and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in barrier regulation in IBS and healthy individuals.
Methods
Colon biopsies from 32 women with IBS and 15 age-matched healthy women (controls) were mounted in Ussing chambers; we measured numbers of fluorescently labeled Escherichia coli HS and Salmonella typhimurium that passed through from the mucosal side to the serosal side of the tissue. Some biopsies were exposed to agents that block the VIP receptors (VPAC1 and VPAC2) or mast cells. Levels of VIP and tryptase were measured in plasma and biopsy lysates. Number of mast cells and mast cells that express VIP or VIP receptors were quantified by immunofluorescence. Biopsies from an additional 5 patients with IBS and 4 controls were mounted in chambers and Salmonella were added; we studied passage routes through the epithelium by transmission electron microscopy and expression of tight junctions by confocal microscopy
Results
In colon biopsies from patients with IBS, larger numbers of E coli HS and Salmonella passed through the epithelium than in biopsies from controls (P<.0005). In transmission electron microscopy analyses, bacteria were found to cross the epithelium via only the transcellular route. Bacterial passage was reduced in biopsies from patients with IBS and controls after addition of antibodies against VPACs or ketotifen, which inhibits mast cells. Plasma samples from patients with IBS had higher levels of VIP than plasma samples from controls. Biopsies from patients with IBS had higher levels of tryptase, larger numbers of mast cells, and a higher percentage of mast cells that express VPAC1 than biopsies from controls. In biopsies from patients with IBS, addition of Salmonella significantly reduced levels of occludin; subsequent addition of ketotifen significantly reversed this effect.
Conclusions
We found that colonic epithelium tissues from patients with IBS have increased translocation of commensal and pathogenic live bacteria, compared with controls. Mechanisms of increased translocation include mast cells and VIP.
Keywords: Intestinal permeability, bacteria, ketotifen, inflammation
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by chronically recurring abdominal pain and disturbed bowel habits and affects 10–15% of the general population in industrialized countries, with a 2:1 female predominance1. Even though the pathophysiology is incompletely understood, increasing evidence supports the concept of altered brain-gut microbiome interactions in IBS etiology2, 3.
For many years it has been known that IBS-like symptoms develop following an acute gastroenteritis in about 10% of affected individuals4, 5. Specifically, it has been confirmed in several studies that enteric infection with Salmonella, such as the foodborne pathogenic gram-negative Salmonella typhimurium, is a significant risk factor for the development of IBS6, 7. Evidence also suggests that IBS can be associated with an altered gut microbiota composition or dysbiosis8, including the presence of Escherichia (E.) coli9, 10. Some of the observed changes in species richness or community composition may reflect alterations in gastrointestinal transit11. There is increasing evidence demonstrating enhanced intestinal permeability and altered tight junction patterns12–14 both in colon and small bowel of IBS15–19. In intestinal barrier function studies, IBS patients typically have been divided into subgroups based on predominant bowel habit (IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D), IBS-constipation (IBS-C), IBS-mixed (IBS-M))20, but the association between bowel habit subtype and mucosal barrier function remains unclear15, 21. There is some evidence that visceral hypersensitivity, a common feature in IBS, may be linked to disturbances in barrier function22, and such changes have been observed in an animal model of gastrointestinal infection23.
The gut barrier function is controlled by several physiological mechanisms. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) is a neuropeptide found in both immune cells, including lymphocytes24 and mast cells (MCs)25, and in enteric neurons of the gastrointestinal tract. These neurons innervate the intestinal epithelium and regulate ion and fluid secretion, as well as epithelial homeostasis26, 27. A few studies have also implicated VIP in the regulation of intestinal permeability28–30. Our group previously showed that MCs and VIP regulate the ileal barrier of healthy humans and during stress in rats via VIP-receptors (VPAC1/VPAC2) on MCs25. Increased plasma levels of VIP have been reported in IBS patients31 and in an IBS-animal model32, and there appears to be a positive correlation between an increased intestinal transcellular permeability and amount of mucosal MCs in IBS-D33. In addition, increased MC numbers and tryptase levels have been found in biopsies of caecum34 and jejunum35 of IBS patients, and increased paracellular permeability and higher MC numbers were demonstrated in colon of IBS-D patients18. To our knowledge there are no reports exploring the intestinal epithelial response to live bacteria and its regulation by VIP and MCs in the colonic mucosa of IBS subjects.
The aims of the study were to investigate 1) the passage of live commensal and pathogenic microbes, through the colonic mucosa of women with IBS 2) the role of MCs and VIP in the regulation of bacterial passage, and 3) the distribution of MCs, VIP/VPACs in the colon of IBS subjects. We present evidence of increased bacterial passage through the colonic mucosa in IBS, with MCs and VIP involved as modulating factors. Our findings indicate a potential link between altered intestinal barrier function, and the increased transepithelial passage of bacteria in IBS, and suggest an involvement of VIP and MCs in this mechanism.
Material and Methods (See also Supplementary Methods)
Subjects and endoscopy
Subjects
Thirty-seven women with IBS, mean age 32.2 years (range 19–55), meeting Rome III criteria, were recruited from the Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital, Linköping. IBS patients had a moderate-severe IBS with mean symptom severity score of 347 (range 167–480)36. Twenty healthy age-matched women mean age 29.9 years (range 20–48) without medical history of gastrointestinal symptoms or complaints, were recruited as healthy controls (HCs). IBS subjects were classified according to predominant bowel habit into IBS-M (n=21), IBS-C (n=8) and IBS-D (n=8). Exclusion criteria for both groups included self-reported allergy, organic gastrointestinal disease, metabolic or neurological disorders and nicotine or NSAID intake. The committee of human ethics, Linköping, approved the study and all subjects gave their written informed consent.
IBS subgroups
IBS patients were subgrouped based on the predominant stool consistency according to the Rome III questionnaire20.
Sigmoidoscopy
A flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed after 8 hours of fasting without sedation and with scope insertion approximately 30–40 cm orally from linea dentata. Colonic biopsies were taken with a biopsy forceps without a central lance, and directly put in ice-cold oxygenated Krebs buffer37. Prior to sigmoidoscopy, venous blood samples were collected for measurements of VIP concentrations.
Ussing chamber experiments
Barrier function studies
Colonic biopsies from 32 IBS patients and 15 HCs were mounted in Ussing chambers38 as previously37. After 20 min biopsies were treated with 1 μM anti-VPAC, 1 μM of the MC-blocker ketotifen or vehicle (Krebs). After another 20 min, 34 μCi/ml of the paracellular probe51chromium (Cr)-EDTA was added to the mucosal side of each chamber. Live green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labelled E. coli HS or Salmonella typhimurium, prepared as previously37, was added to the mucosal sides of separate chambers at a final concentration of 108 CFU/ml. Serosal samples were collected and bacterial and 51Cr-EDTA passage was measured. The transepithelial potential difference (PD), short-circuit current (Isc) and the transepithelial resistance (TER) across the tissues were monitored throughout the experiments to ensure tissue viability.
Electron microscopy
To identify bacterial translocation and MC ultrastructure, colonic biopsies from 5 IBS patients and 4 HCs were mounted in Ussing chambers and exposed to bacteria. Anti-VPACs or ketotifen was added as described above followed by addition of GFP-labelled Salmonella. One biopsy was added Krebs, as control to evaluate the eventual effects on tissue structure during incubation. After 30 min, biopsies were fixed and processed following standard protocols for scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM). MC-degranulation was also quantified in basal biopsies, not mounted in Ussing chambers, from 20 IBS patients and 8 HCs.
Quantification of tight junctions
To study the effects of Salmonella, anti-VPACs and ketotifen on tight junctions, biopsies from 4 IBS patients and 4 HCs were mounted in Ussing chambers and added anti-VPACs, ketotifen and Salmonella. After 30 min, biopsies were fixed in the chambers and prepared for immunofluorescence of tight junctions (see below).
Giemsa staining of biopsies
To identify the presence of intestinal bacteria at baseline, one paraffin-embedded biopsy/individual, was stained with routine Giemsa according to a previous protocol39. Bacteria in 10 areas of 0.033 mm2/biopsy were counted and results are presented as bacteria/mm2.
Measurements in biopsies and plasma
Preparation of biopsy lysates
Lysates from frozen biopsies were prepared to a final concentration of 1 mg protein/ml, according to the procedure described in Supplementary Methods.
Quantification of VIP in plasma and biopsies by EIA
To examine VIP levels in plasma and biopsies from IBS patients and HCs, a VIP-EIA kit was used following manufacturer’s instructions (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Germany).
Quantification of MC-tryptase in biopsies by Western Blot
Biopsy lysates with protein concentrations of 20μg/μl were loaded on gels and further processed as described in Supplementary Methods. Values were normalized according to the β-actin loading control and values are given as fluorescence units.
Microscopy
Quantification of MC-tryptase, VIP and VPACs
Biopsies from 32 IBS patients and 15 HCs were stained following the same protocol previously described for tight junctions. Primary antibodies used were MC tryptase+ VPAC1/VPAC2 or VIP. The total number of MCs, and co-localization with either VPACs or VIP were quantified manually and results are presented as the percentages of VIP/VPAC1/VPAC2 positive MCs from patients with IBS and HCs respectively.
Evaluation of mucosal MC ultrastructure
MCs were identified based on morphological characteristics in a minimum of 20 ultrathin sections from each sample. Ultrastructural changes indicative of activation were described and a quantitative method was used to assess MC-activation, based on the degranulation area. For each MC, the cytoplasm and degranulated area (loss of granular content) were measured using the ImageJ Fiji software (NIH, Bethseda, MD). Degranulation was expressed as the percentage of degranulated area respect to the total area of the cytoplasm.
Evaluation of bacterial passage routes
After incubation, the presence of bacteria on the epithelial surface was observed by SEM and TEM. Interaction of Salmonella with epithelial cells and bacteria crossing through the colonocytes were identified by TEM.
Immunofluorescence of tight junctions
Biopsies were stained for occludin and ZO-1, evaluated by confocal microscopy and images were further processed in ImageJ Fiji software. Results were normalized and presented as % of the expression in vehicle biopsies set to 100%.
Statistic analysis
Parametric data are given as mean±SEM and comparisons between groups were done with Student t test and ANOVA test. Non-parametric data are given as median (25–75th interquartile range) and comparisons between groups were done with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used for paired comparisons. Differences with p<0.05 were considered significant. Correlation testing was done with Spearman Correlation test.
Results
Mucosal barrier function in IBS and HCs
Electrophysiology
Ussing chamber experiments showed stable PD after equilibration in all biopsies. The active net ion transport, assessed as Isc, was similar in IBS and HCs throughout the experiments. There were no effects on Isc of E. coli HS, Salmonella typhimurium, anti-VPACs or ketotifen (data not shown).
In vehicle chambers there was a lower TER in IBS compared to HCs when experiments were started (22 ohm/cm2 (19–27) vs. 25 (21–32), p<0.05), at 30 min (21 (18–25) vs. 24 (22–29), p<0.05), and at 60 min (20 (17–24) vs. 24 (20–26), p<0.05). At 90 min from start, TER remained lower in IBS (20 (17–25)) compared to HCs (24 (19–26)), however, this difference no longer reached statistical significance (p=0.07). In IBS biopsies added Salmonella there was a significantly decreased TER at 30, 60 and 90 min compared to vehicle, p<0.05 (Table 1). In chambers pre-incubated with ketotifen, the Salmonella-induced decrease in TER was inhibited, p<0.05, while anti-VPACs had no significant effect. In HC, Salmonella had no significant effect on TER, neither at 30, 60 or 90 min (data not shown). Biopsies mounted in chambers with added E. coli HS showed the same pattern for TER as vehicle chambers in both IBS and HC (data not shown).
Table 1.
Time after start | Vehicle |
Salmonella (% decrease from start) |
Salmonella+Anti-VPACs | Salmonella+ketotifen |
---|---|---|---|---|
30 min | 3.4 [1.0–6.6] | 12.4 [1.3–25.7]* | 8.1 [1.5–14.2] | 4.4 [0.0–11.8]# |
60 min | 5.1 [3.1–11.1] | 19.6 [4.8–33.6]* | 10.8 [0.0–17.8] | 7.8 [0.0–16.4]# |
90 min | 6.7 [3.5–10.4] | 15.1 [3.1–30.0]* | 10.0 [0.3–21.6] | 8.8 [2.8–19.9] |
Colonic biopsies from 32 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were mounted in Ussing chambers and added buffer (vehicle), Salmonella, Salmonella+vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor blocker (anti-VPACs) or Salmonella+ketotifen. Transepithelial resistance (TER) was monitored at 30, 60 and 90 min from start and values are given as % decrease in TER from start.
= p<0.05 vs. vehicle at 30, 60, 90 min, respectively,
=p<0.05 vs. Salmonella at 30 and 60 min, respectively. Comparisons were done with Mann–Whitney U test and values given as (median (25th–75th percentile)).
Increased bacterial and paracellular passage in IBS
The transepithelial passage in biopsies of IBS subjects was nearly 2 times higher for E. coli, and 2.8 times higher for Salmonella compared with HCs, p<0.0005, and fluorescence microscopy confirmed uptake of both E. coli and Salmonella in Ussing chambers (Fig. 1 A–B). The passage of the two bacteria strains was not significantly correlated.
Permeability to 51Cr-EDTA was higher in IBS compared to HCs (1.10 cm/s x10−6 (0.74–1.50) vs. 0.80 (0.53–1.10), p<0.05). Addition of E. coli or Salmonella had no significant effect on 51Cr-EDTA permeability. No significant correlations were identified between 51Cr-EDTA, Salmonella, and E coli passage.
Bacterial passage route
E coli and Salmonella were detected on the epithelial surface and in the lamina propia after incubation (Fig. 1B). Salmonella was observed to interact with the microvilli of colonocytes and translocation was identified by endocytosis through the transcellular pathway (Fig. 1C). No bacteria were observed to interact at the tight junctions in any sample. No differences were identified between groups and treatments, in terms of bacteria interaction with the epithelial surface and internalization to the colonocytes.
Intestinal bacteria identified by Giemsa
Giemsa staining of biopsies that had not been experimentally exposed to bacteria revealed that bacteria within the epithelium were only scarcely seen in both IBS and HCs (Fig. 1D).
Regulation of barrier function by VIP and MCs
Bacterial passage was significantly diminished in both IBS subjects and HCs after blocking with anti-VPACs and ketotifen (Fig. 2A–B).
Tight junction proteins
Confocal microscopy showed close to significantly decreased baseline levels of occludin in IBS (346.7 fluorescence units (308.2–371.9)) compared to HCs (420.8 (368.8–609.7)), p=0.057, but no difference in ZO-1 expressions (IBS: 530.4 (345.5–599.9), HCs: 398.7 (280.9–463.4)). The addition of Salmonella to the biopsies decreased occludin expression in the apical side of the colonocytes compared to vehicle (set to 100%) in both IBS (42.9 [21.8–80.1]) and HCs (47.3 [10.7–105.8]), but it did not reach statistical significance. Notably, in IBS biopsies pre-incubated with ketotifen, the Salmonella-induced decrease in occludin expression was significantly inhibited (130.5 [100.2–154.6], p<0.005), while anti-VPACs had no significant effect (61.6 [29.0–88.4]). There was no effect on expression or distribution of ZO-1 by Salmonella, ketotifen, or anti-VPACs. For more detailed results see Supplementary Table 1. Representative photographs of occludin staining during the different conditions are shown in Fig. 3 and for ZO-1 in Supplementary Fig. 1.
Increased VIP in plasma of IBS patients
VIP in plasma of IBS patients was higher than in HCs (2.1±0.09 ng/ml vs. 1.5±0.09, p<0.0005). However, there were no significant differences in biopsy lysates (0.57±0.10 ng/mg protein vs. 0.32±0.05). There was no significant correlation between VIP levels in plasma and in biopsies. No significant correlation was observed between E. coli/Salmonella and VIP levels and between 51Cr-EDTA and VIP levels.
Increased number of MCs, MCs expressing VPAC1, and MC-activation in IBS
Colonic IBS biopsies showed increased number of MCs compared to HCs (104.0±8.0 MCs/mm2 vs. 73.7±11.6, p<0.05). Furthermore, the percentage of MCs expressing VPAC1 was higher in IBS compared to HCs (46±4.2 % vs. 31±6.2, p<0.05). However, there was no difference in the percentage of MCs expressing VPAC2 (30±4.4 % vs. 26±6.1). When comparing microscopy results patient by patient it was revealed that only 75% of the IBS patients had elevated MC numbers compared to the mean of HCs, and 78% showed higher percentage of MCs expressing VPAC1. Representative photographs of MCs expressing VPAC1 in an IBS patient and HC are shown in Fig. 4A–B. MCs expressing VPAC2 in IBS colon is illustrated in Fig 4C. There was a trend to higher amounts of MCs containing VIP in IBS compared to HCs, however it did not reach statistical significance (24±1.0 % vs. 20±1.3, p=0.06). A VIP-containing MC of an IBS patient is shown in Fig. 5. In all subjects, MC density correlated with the percentage of MCs expressing VPAC1 (R=0.35, p=0.01). In addition, the percentage of MCs expressing VPAC1 strongly correlated with the percentage of MCs expressing VPAC2 (R=0.67 p<0.0001).
Analysis of biopsy lysates by Western blot revealed higher levels of MC-tryptase in IBS compared to HCs (2.26±0.46 fluorescence units vs. 1.42±0.46, p<0.05) (Fig. 6A).
In TEM, mucosal MCs showed signs of activation in samples from all subjects, with variable granular electron density and piecemeal degranulation. However, in MCs from IBS patients, distribution of the cytoplasmic granules to the periphery, close to the plasma membrane, was identified, together with higher frequency of membrane projections to the extracellular matrix, indicative of active release of granular content. Anaphylactic degranulation was not observed in any sample, although some MCs in the IBS-group also displayed fusion of several granules. MCs from IBS showed higher degree of degranulation, however this difference did not reach statistical significance, p=0.113 (Fig. 6B). Exposure to vehicle did not affect MC ultrastructure, as they were similar to MCs in non-incubated tissues. Salmonella increased MC degranulation, and pre-incubation with anti-VPACs or ketotifen maintained a more stable granular structure in IBS and HCs. However, degranulation was not statistically significant between experimental conditions (Fig. 6C–D).
There was no correlation between MC-tryptase in biopsy lysates and bacterial passage (E. coli and Salmonella), however in all subjects, MC density correlated with MC-tryptase expression in biopsy lysates (R=0.34, p=0.03).
Relation between gut findings and clinical data
There was no correlation between age of subjects with IBS/HC and any of the parameters investigated (results not shown).
There was no significant correlation between symptoms (severity scoring system, IBS-SSS) and bacterial passage, MC numbers, or MC-tryptase. There was a negative correlation between 51Cr-EDTA (R=−0.41, p<0.05) and MC degranulation (R=−0.59, p<0.01) with IBS-SSS. Significant differences were found between the subgroups IBS-M and IBS-C in terms of MCs. MC density was higher in IBS-M compared with IBS-C (127±48 MCs/mm2 vs. 75±23, p<0.005) and the proportion of MCs expressing VPAC1 and VPAC2 was significantly higher in IBS-M compared with IBS-C (VPAC1: 55.7±4.3 % vs. 21.5±6.3, p<0.005; VPAC2: 38.4±4.9 % vs. 8.4±3.2, p<0.0005). For IBS-D the numbers were 46.3±10.3% for VPAC1 and 32.1±12.9 % for VPAC2.
DISCUSSION
In the present study we demonstrated that female IBS subjects show a greater colonic epithelial permeability to live bacteria and that this barrier dysfunction may be associated with an upregulation of MCs- and VIP-related signalling mechanisms. IBS patients had an increased passage of both live E. coli HS, a commensal bacteria that normally colonize the colon,40 and of the pathogenic bacteria Salmonella typhimurium. In IBS and HCs, bacterial passage of both strains was diminished by blocking the VIP-receptors as well as after stabilizing MCs with ketotifen. Ketotifen is a histamin H1-receptor antagonist and it has been reported that thresholds for discomfort were increased in IBS when taking this drug compared with placebo41. We also found that the colonic mucosa of IBS patients had an enhanced number of MCs and that MCs of IBS patients expressed more VPAC1 than HCs. Further, biopsy lysates from IBS patients demonstrated elevated tryptase levels and the MCs displayed a more activated morphological/ultrastructural phenotype when compared with HCs. Even though disturbances of the epithelial barrier function have previously been described in IBS19, 42, to our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating an increased transepithelial passage of live bacteria in human subjects with IBS, and identifies VIP as a key regulatory molecule of this mechanism.
The role of immune activation and its involvement in IBS clinical symptoms remains unclear. Evidence for mucosal immune activation in IBS has been reported in some, but not all studies3, 43. Increased MC numbers, T-cell activation and cytokine polymorphism have also been reported in IBS colon by numerous groups44–46. For example, Cremon et al47 found increased MC and T cell numbers in the colon of 50% of IBS subjects. In the present study we found increased MC numbers in 75% of IBS subjects, however, we could not find any correlation between MC-infiltration and symptoms.
There is growing evidence for altered microbiota composition in some IBS patients48. The gut microbiota is involved in several aspects of gastrointestinal function, including motility, sensitivity and immune function2. Recent data also suggest that the human gastrointestinal microbiota is able to communicate with the central nervous system49. E. coli K12 and HB101 have been used as commensal-like bacteria to study luminal uptake/passage into the intestinal mucosa37, 39. In the present study we chose the human commensal E. coli HS as a non-pathogenic E. coli, which has similar properties as K12 and HB10150. Live E. coli HS passed through the colonic mucosa of IBS patients to a significantly higher extent compared with HCs. These results suggest that commensal bacteria and its metabolites can potentially affect and interact with intra- and submucosal targets in IBS to a greater degree than in HCs.
There are multiple pathways how bacteria and bacterial products can interact with immune-neuroendocrine or neural constituents5, 8, 49, 51. However, it is important to remember that gut permeability is determined not only by the transepithelial component, but also by the inner compartment of the mucus layer52. Ex vivo, this mucus layer is easily removed from the epithelial cells due to flow in the Ussing chambers53, which is important to take under consideration when interpreting the results and translating it to the clinical situation. As there was very little overlap between IBS and HCs in terms of transepithelial bacterial passage, and evidence for immune activation has not consistently been found in colon of IBS subjects, despite the fact that all IBS patients had moderate to severe symptoms, it is conceivable that in the intact colon, live bacteria such as E. coli gain access to the underlying submucosa only in those patients who also have a compromised mucus layer. This could also explain why we found IBS symptom severity to be inversely correlated with paracellular permeability, and why there were no significant correlation between symptom severity and bacterial passage and MCs, limited though by a small number of subjects when divided into IBS-subgroups. These findings strongly suggest that alterations in transepithelial permeability alone cannot explain the formation of symptoms in IBS.
Monitoring of electrophysiology showed no difference in Isc between IBS and HCs. Previous studies on Isc and IBS are mostly lacking, however, recently Peters et al54 showed a similar Isc in IBS-C and HCs, which is in line with our findings and indicates an increased bacterial uptake in IBS, even in circumstances where ion transport is unchanged. To further determine changes in permeability due to tight junction components, we chose to study occludin and ZO-1 expression, as main constituents of the apical junctions, based on previous reports demonstrating its deregulation in the colon of IBS13 Our study confirms previous data and extends its contribution to bacteria-mediated epithelial alterations. Although the role of occludin still remains unknown, our results suggest its regulation by mechanisms that involve MC-activation. Since bacteria was not observed entering the epithelium through the paracellular space, we can speculate that occludin deregulation is secondary to epithelial invasion and, probably, immune activation, by e.g. TNF-α which has been related with the internalization of occludin, inducing secretion of water, barrier dysfunction and diarrhea55
The well-described onset of IBS symptoms after gastroenteritis in a number of affected individuals is another strong indicator of the importance of microbial factors in IBS pathophysiology48, 56, 57. It has also been demonstrated that having Salmonella infection during childhood was a risk factor for the development of long-standing IBS symptoms in adulthood58. Salmonella typhimurium is a pathogenic gram-negative bacteria that is well known to cause gastroenteritis in humans and other mammals59. The toxicity is based on an outer membrane with lipopolysaccharides protecting the bacteria from the environment. In the present study we found an almost 3 times higher passage of live Salmonella typhimurium through IBS mucosa compared to HCs. This indicates that there is a disturbance in IBS patients leading to increased invasion of pathogenic bacteria into the epithelium and the underlying submucosa. One could speculate that the enhanced translocation of Salmonella could lead to increased antigen load and for example activation of MCs and other immune cells, which might facilitate local immune activation. Interestingly, the passage of E. coli and Salmonella did not correlate, indicating different uptake mechanisms and diverse translocation patterns.
Only a small decrease in baseline TER was found in IBS compared to HCs, which may be due to the fact that conventional TER measurements are not sensitive enough to fully detect differences between biopsies. Another noteworthy point is that neither Salmonella nor E. coli significantly affected 51Cr-EDTA permeability, even though Salmonella had a significant effect on TER. Several pathogenic E. coli strains have shown to affect the paracellular pathway in intestinal epithelia60; however, others and us observed no effects on paracellular permeability by non-pathogenic E. coli strains39,61. For Salmonella one could have expected an effect on 51Cr-EDTA permeability, since previous studies indicate that Salmonella decreases TER and cause tight junction redistribution in vitro62. Though, in the present study there was only a trend to increased 51Cr-EDTA permeability by Salmonella, despite a significant effect on TER, which probably refers to different regulations of permeability pathways i.e. the leak and the pore pathways63.
Functional experiments in the present study demonstrated that bacteria passage was significantly diminished after blocking the VPACs and after ketotifen administration, an effect that was not only seen in IBS patients, but also in HCs, suggesting the involvement of VIP and MCs in the physiological regulation of intestinal barrier function. However, the fact that both VIP levels, and MCs expressing VPACs, are increased in IBS relative to health, further points at a novel role of this mediator in bacterial translocation in IBS. There are only a few reports examining the influence of VIP in IBS. Zhang et al31 showed increased VIP levels in plasma of IBS patients compared to controls, and in an IBS-stress model, Wu et al32 showed colonic MC-activation and increased VIP levels in stressed animals. Interestingly, electro-acupuncture inhibited these events, indicating that the interactions of MCs and VIP could be key mechanisms in IBS pathophysiology.
In addition we found increased VIP levels in plasma of IBS patients compared to controls. In biopsy lysates there was only a trend to increased VIP levels, however, IBS patients showed almost 2 times higher VIP-concentrations compared to controls. Since IBS patients also had elevated VIP-receptor density on their MCs in combination with an increased MC density we presume that the physiological VIP-MC-dependent regulation of bacterial passage might be upregulated in IBS.
MCs are innate immune cells involved in protection against pathogens and in allergic responses. When activated, they undergo a degranulation process, which leads to the release of mediators, among which histamine and tryptase have proved to modulate visceral hypersensitivity and epithelial permeability. Our study identified increased MC-tryptase together with more pronounced ultrastructural signs of MC-activation from IBS, even though the quantification method used did not corroborate our observations, which might refer to a large variability within the IBS-group at baseline. Salmonella did induce MC degranulation from both IBS and HCs, and treatments used reduced MC-activation; however a larger cohort should be studied in order to better prove these effects. Most studies showing differences in MC-density. Moreover, in contrast to the majority of previous reports, subjects with known allergies or atopic diseases were excluded in the current study, reducing the risk of allergy and atopic disease as an important confounding factor when studying MCs in IBS64. In fact, a combination of allergic factors, such as positive skin tests, elevated IgE or eosinophil levels, personal or family history of allergy, significantly correlated with MC count and enhanced intestinal permeability65. Recently, a positive correlation between increased intestinal permeability and number of mucosal MCs was found in IBS-D patients33. However, in the present study we found no significant correlation between MC count and mucosal permeability.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates an increased transepithelial passage of live commensal and pathogenic bacteria in the colon of IBS subjects. Both MCs and VIP appear to be important factors in the regulation of this bacterial translocation through the mucosa, and theses mechanisms seem to be upregulated in IBS. Future studies are required to elucidate the relationship between these epithelial abnormalities, mucosal immune activation and symptom generation in IBS subjects.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Grant support: Stiftelsen Hälsofonden, County Council of Östergötland (AVK); Diarrheal Disease Research Centre, Linköping University (AVK); AFA research foundation (SAW); Bengt-Ihre fonden, County Council of Östergötland (SAW). Supported in part by Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Investigación Sanitaria, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad: FI12/00254 (ESR); CP10/00502, PI13/00935 and MV16/00028, CIBEREHD CB06/04/0021 (MV) and NIH R01 DK048351 (EAM).
Abbreviations
- 51Cr-EDTA
51chromium (Cr)-EDTA
- E. coli
Escherichia coli
- HCs
healthy controls
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- IBS
irritable bowel syndrome
- IBS-C
IBS with constipation
- IBS-D
IBS with diarrhea
- IBS-M
IBS with mixed stool consistency
- IBS-SSS
IBS severity scoring system
- Isc
short-circuit current
- MCs
mast cells
- Papp
apparent permeability coefficient
- PD
transepithelial potential difference
- RT
room temperature
- SEM
scanning electron microscopy
- TER
transepithelial resistance
- TEM
transmission electron microscopy
- VIP
vasoactive intestinal polypeptide
- VPAC1
VPAC2, VIP receptors types 1 and 2
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Author contributions:
O. Bednarska: Acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of manuscript
S. A. Walter: Study concept and design; acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting manuscript; statistical analysis; obtained funding; administrative, and material study supervision.
M. Casado-Bedmar: Acquisition, analysis and interpretation of immunofluorescence data
M. Ström: Study concept; analysis and interpretation of data; administrative support; revision of the manuscript.
E. Salvo-Romero: Analysis and interpretation of electron microscopy data; revision of the manuscript.
M. Vicario: Acquisition, analysis and interpretation of electron microscopy data; drafting and revision of the manuscript.
E. A. Mayer: Interpretation of data and review of manuscript.
Å. V. Keita: Study concept and design; acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting manuscript; statistical analysis; obtained funding; administrative, and material study supervision.
Disclosures: The authors have nothing to disclose.
References
- 1.Sperber AD, Dumitrascu D, Fukudo S, et al. The global prevalence of IBS in adults remains elusive due to the heterogeneity of studies: a Rome Foundation working team literature review. Gut. 2016 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311240. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Gupta A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:926–38. doi: 10.1172/JCI76304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ahn JY, Lee KH, Choi CH, et al. Colonic mucosal immune activity in irritable bowel syndrome: comparison with healthy controls and patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1001–11. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2930-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chaudhary NA, Truelove SC. The irritable colon syndrome. A study of the clinical features, predisposing causes, and prognosis in 130 cases. Q J Med. 1962;31:307–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barbara G, Feinle–Bisset C, Ghoshal UC, et al. The Intestinal Microenvironment and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.028. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mearin F, Perez-Oliveras M, Perello A, et al. Dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome after a Salmonella gastroenteritis outbreak: one-year follow-up cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:98–104. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keithlin J, Sargeant JM, Thomas MK, et al. Systematic review and meta–analysis of the proportion of non-typhoidal Salmonella cases that develop chronic sequelae. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1333–51. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814002829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ohman L, Tornblom H, Simren M. Crosstalk at the mucosal border: importance of the gut microenvironment in IBS. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:36–49. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Casen C, Vebo HC, Sekelja M, et al. Deviations in human gut microbiota: a novel diagnostic test for determining dysbiosis in patients with IBS or IBD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:71–83. doi: 10.1111/apt.13236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dior M, Delagreverie H, Duboc H, et al. Interplay between bile acid metabolism and microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:1339–40. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vandeputte D, Falony G, Vieira–Silva S, et al. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut. 2016;65:57–62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Coeffier M, Gloro R, Boukhettala N, et al. Increased proteasome–mediated degradation of occludin in irritable bowel syndrome. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2010;105:1181–8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bertiaux–Vandaele N, Youmba SB, Belmonte L, et al. The expression and the cellular distribution of the tight junction proteins are altered in irritable bowel syndrome patients with differences according to the disease subtype. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:2165–73. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vanheel H, Vicario M, Vanuytsel T, et al. Impaired duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation in functional dyspepsia. Gut. 2013 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dunlop SP, Hebden J, Campbell E, et al. Abnormal intestinal permeability in subgroups of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1288–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou Q, Zhang B, Verne GN. Intestinal membrane permeability and hypersensitivity in the irritable bowel syndrome. Pain. 2009;146:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shulman RJ, Eakin MN, Czyzewski DI, et al. Increased gastrointestinal permeability and gut inflammation in children with functional abdominal pain and irritable bowel syndrome. J Pediatr. 2008;153:646–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Piche T, Barbara G, Aubert P, et al. Impaired intestinal barrier integrity in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: involvement of soluble mediators. Gut. 2009;58:196–201. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.140806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matricon J, Meleine M, Gelot A, et al. Review article: Associations between immune activation, intestinal permeability and the irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:1009–31. doi: 10.1111/apt.12080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480–91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kerckhoffs AP, Akkermans LM, de Smet MB, et al. Intestinal permeability in irritable bowel syndrome patients: effects of NSAIDs. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:716–23. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0765-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Annahazi A, Ferrier L, Bezirard V, et al. Luminal cysteine-proteases degrade colonic tight junction structure and are responsible for abdominal pain in constipation-predominant IBS. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1322–31. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Halliez MC, Motta JP, Feener TD, et al. Giardia duodenalis induces paracellular bacterial translocation and causes postinfectious visceral hypersensitivity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310:G574–85. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00144.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ottaway CA, Lewis DL, Asa SL. Vasoactive intestinal peptide–containing nerves in Peyer’s patches. Brain Behav Immun. 1987;1:148–58. doi: 10.1016/0889-1591(87)90017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Keita AV, Carlsson AH, Cigehn M, et al. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide regulates barrier function via mast cells in human intestinal follicle-associated epithelium and during stress in rats. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:e406–17. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Quin JA, Sgambati SA, Goldenring JR, et al. PYY inhibition of VIP–stimulated ion transport in the rabbit distal ileum. J Surg Res. 1995;58:111–5. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1995.1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Izu LT, McCulle SL, Ferreri-Jacobia MT, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide-stimulated Cl-secretion: activation of cAMP-dependent K+ channels. J Membr Biol. 2002;186:145–57. doi: 10.1007/s00232-001-0145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Neunlist M, Toumi F, Oreschkova T, et al. Human ENS regulates the intestinal epithelial barrier permeability and a tight junction–associated protein ZO-1 via VIPergic pathways. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;285:G1028–36. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00066.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bakker R, Dekker K, De Jonge HR, et al. VIP, serotonin, and epinephrine modulate the ion selectivity of tight junctions of goldfish intestine. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:R362–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.264.2.R362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Conlin VS, Wu X, Nguyen C, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide ameliorates intestinal barrier disruption associated with Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G735–50. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90551.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang H, Yan Y, Shi R, et al. Correlation of gut hormones with irritable bowel syndrome. Digestion. 2008;78:72–6. doi: 10.1159/000165352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu HG, Jiang B, Zhou EH, et al. Regulatory mechanism of electroacupuncture in irritable bowel syndrome: preventing MC activation and decreasing SP VIP secretion. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1644–51. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee H, Park JH, Park DI, et al. Mucosal mast cell count is associated with intestinal permeability in patients with diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19:244–50. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.O’Sullivan M, Clayton N, Breslin NP, et al. Increased mast cells in the irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2000;12:449–57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.2000.00221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guilarte M, Santos J, de Torres I, et al. Diarrhoea-predominant IBS patients show mast cell activation and hyperplasia in the jejunum. Gut. 2007;56:203–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.100594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ. The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 1997;11:395–402. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.142318000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Keita AV, Gullberg E, Ericson AC, et al. Characterization of antigen and bacterial transport in the follicle-associated epithelium of human ileum. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology. 2006;86:504–16. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grass GM, Sweetana SA. In vitro measurement of gastrointestinal tissue permeability using a new diffusion cell. Pharm Res. 1988;5:372–6. doi: 10.1023/a:1015911712079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Keita AV, Salim SY, Jiang T, et al. Increased uptake of non-pathogenic E. coli via the follicle-associated epithelium in longstanding ileal Crohn’s disease. The Journal of pathology. 2008;215:135–44. doi: 10.1002/path.2337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rautava S, Luoto R, Salminen S, et al. Microbial contact during pregnancy, intestinal colonization and human disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9:565–76. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Klooker TK, Braak B, Koopman KE, et al. The mast cell stabiliser ketotifen decreases visceral hypersensitivity and improves intestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2010;59:1213–21. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.213108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hyland NP, Quigley EM, Brint E. Microbiota-host interactions in irritable bowel syndrome: epithelial barrier, immune regulation and brain-gut interactions. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:8859–66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.8859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Braak B, Klooker TK, Wouters MM, et al. Mucosal immune cell numbers and visceral sensitivity in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: is there any relationship? Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:715–26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.An S, Zong G, Wang Z, et al. Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in mast cells contributes to the regulation of inflammatory cytokines in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:1083–93. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ohman L, Isaksson S, Lindmark AC, et al. T–cell activation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1205–12. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Park JH, Rhee PL, Kim HS, et al. Mucosal mast cell counts correlate with visceral hypersensitivity in patients with diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:71–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cremon C, Gargano L, Morselli-Labate AM, et al. Mucosal immune activation in irritable bowel syndrome: gender-dependence and association with digestive symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:392–400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ohman L, Simren M. Intestinal microbiota and its role in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) Current gastroenterology reports. 2013;15:323. doi: 10.1007/s11894-013-0323-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tillisch K. The effects of gut microbiota on CNS function in humans. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:404–10. doi: 10.4161/gmic.29232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rasko DA, Rosovitz MJ, Myers GS, et al. The pangenome structure of Escherichia coli: comparative genomic analysis of E. coli commensal and pathogenic isolates. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:6881–93. doi: 10.1128/JB.00619-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mayer EA, Labus JS, Tillisch K, et al. Towards a systems view of IBS. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:592–605. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Johansson ME, Phillipson M, Petersson J, et al. The inner of the two Muc2 mucin-dependent mucus layers in colon is devoid of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15064–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803124105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ermund A, Gustafsson JK, Hansson GC, et al. Mucus properties and goblet cell quantification in mouse, rat and human ileal Peyer’s patches. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peters SA, Edogawa S, Sundt WJ, et al. Constipation–Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Females Have Normal Colonic Barrier and Secretory Function. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:913–923. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Marchiando AM, Shen L, Graham WV, et al. Caveolin-1-dependent occludin endocytosis is required for TNF-induced tight junction regulation in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:111–26. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200902153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Marshall JK, Thabane M, Garg AX, et al. Incidence and epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome after a large waterborne outbreak of bacterial dysentery. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:445–50. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.05.053. quiz 660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Halvorson HA, Schlett CD, Riddle MS. Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome–a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1894–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00654.x. quiz 1942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cremon C, Stanghellini V, Pallotti F, et al. Salmonella gastroenteritis during childhood is a risk factor for irritable bowel syndrome in adulthood. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:69–77. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Crowley SM, Knodler LA, Vallance BA. Salmonella and the Inflammasome: Battle for Intracellular Dominance. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2016;397:43–67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-41171-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Berkes J, Viswanathan VK, Savkovic SD, et al. Intestinal epithelial responses to enteric pathogens: effects on the tight junction barrier, ion transport, and inflammation. Gut. 2003;52:439–51. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.3.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zareie M, Riff J, Donato K, et al. Novel effects of the prototype translocating Escherichia coli, strain C25 on intestinal epithelial structure and barrier function. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:1782–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu Q, Yuan L, Deng J, et al. Lactobacillus protects the integrity of intestinal epithelial barrier damaged by pathogenic bacteria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:26. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Shen L, Weber CR, Raleigh DR, et al. Tight junction pore and leak pathways: a dynamic duo. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:283–309. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tobin MC, Moparty B, Farhadi A, et al. Atopic irritable bowel syndrome: a novel subgroup of irritable bowel syndrome with allergic manifestations. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100:49–53. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60404-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vivinus-Nebot M, Dainese R, Anty R, et al. Combination of allergic factors can worsen diarrheic irritable bowel syndrome: role of barrier defects and mast cells. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:75–81. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.