Abstract
Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a rare genetic form of isolated gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) deficiency caused by mutations in > 30 genes. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is the most frequently mutated gene in CHH and is implicated in GnRH neuron development and maintenance. We note that a CHH FGFR1 mutation (p.L342S) decreases signaling of the metabolic regulator FGF21 by impairing the association of FGFR1 with β‐Klotho (KLB), the obligate co‐receptor for FGF21. We thus hypothesized that the metabolic FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 pathway is involved in CHH. Genetic screening of 334 CHH patients identified seven heterozygous loss‐of‐function KLB mutations in 13 patients (4%). Most patients with KLB mutations (9/13) exhibited metabolic defects. In mice, lack of Klb led to delayed puberty, altered estrous cyclicity, and subfertility due to a hypothalamic defect associated with inability of GnRH neurons to release GnRH in response to FGF21. Peripheral FGF21 administration could indeed reach GnRH neurons through circumventricular organs in the hypothalamus. We conclude that FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 signaling plays an essential role in GnRH biology, potentially linking metabolism with reproduction.
Keywords: beta‐klotho, congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, fibroblast growth factor 21, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1
Subject Categories: Genetics, Gene Therapy & Genetic Disease; Metabolism
Introduction
Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a disorder characterized by absent or partial puberty and infertility due to isolated gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) deficiency. When CHH is associated with anosmia, the term Kallmann syndrome (KS) is used. The genetics of CHH is complex with mutations in over 30 genes known to be involved, and with both classical and complex modes of inheritance, such as oligogenicity (Boehm et al, 2015; Stamou et al, 2016).
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is essential for cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration during embryonic development. Gain‐of‐function mutations in FGFR1 cause several skeletal disorders such as Pfeiffer syndrome (MIM: 101600) and Jackson–Weiss syndrome (MIM: 123150). In 2003, FGFR1 was identified as the first gene underlying the autosomal dominant form of KS (Dode et al, 2003), and subsequently, loss‐of‐function FGFR1 mutations were identified in CHH patients with normal olfaction (Pitteloud et al, 2006). Altogether, FGFR1 mutations are present in approximately 10% of CHH cases and are often associated with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity (Miraoui et al, 2011). Non‐reproductive defects associated with FGFR1 mutations in CHH patients include anosmia, cleft lip/palate, dental agenesis and split‐hand/foot malformation (Costa‐Barbosa et al, 2013; Villanueva et al, 2015).
The identification of a KS patient carrying an FGFR1 p.L342S mutation was informative in identifying FGF8 as a critical ligand of FGFR1 in GnRH biology and in documenting FGF8 as a gene mutated in CHH. The FGFR1 L342S mutant selectively disrupts FGF8 signaling leaving FGF1 or FGF2 signaling unaffected (Pitteloud et al, 2007). This observation led to the identification of FGF8 as a critical morphogen for GnRH neuron ontogenesis (Pitteloud et al, 2007; Chung et al, 2008; Falardeau et al, 2008). Subsequently, several other mutations were identified in genes within the FGF8 genetic network (e.g. IL17RD and FGF17), thus reinforcing the importance of the FGF8/FGFR1 pathway in CHH pathogenesis (Miraoui et al, 2013).
Murine studies have documented and characterized the role of FGFR1, not only in GnRH neuron fate specification, but also in GnRH network homeostasis. Mice with dominant‐negative FGF receptor (dnFGFR) targeted to GnRH neurons exhibit delayed puberty, early reproductive senescence, and loss of > 50% of GnRH neurons in adulthood (Tsai et al, 2005). Furthermore, intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of anti‐FGFR1 antibodies induces rapid and significant weight loss, indicating a role of Fgfr1 in the central regulation of metabolism (Sun et al, 2007). Because Fgf8 expression is mostly restricted to embryonic development (Fon Tacer et al, 2010), we hypothesized that a different ligand for FGFR1 might be implicated in postnatal GnRH biology. FGF21, an endocrine FGF mainly secreted by the liver, has been identified as a major peripheral and central metabolic regulator (Owen et al, 2015). FGF21 binds with low affinity to heparan sulfate and requires β‐Klotho as co‐receptor to signal preferentially through its receptor, FGFR1 isoform c (FGFR1c; Goetz et al, 2007; Kurosu et al, 2007; Ogawa et al, 2007). Notably, β‐Klotho competes with FGF8 for the same binding site in the immunoglobulin D3 domain of FGFR1c (Goetz et al, 2012). We thus hypothesized that defects in the FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 signaling pathway may underlie GnRH deficiency in both humans and rodents.
Results
The CHH‐associated FGFR1 L342S mutation alters FGF21 signaling
The FGFR1 p.L342S mutation identified in a KS proband (Pitteloud et al, 2007) disrupted not only FGF8 signaling, but also FGF21 signaling (Fig 1A and B), consistent with the same binding pocket on FGFR1c competed between FGF8 and β‐Klotho (Goetz et al, 2012). These data led to the hypothesis that FGF21 signaling through FGFR1c and β‐Klotho might be important for GnRH neuron biology. Interestingly, the KS patient harboring the p.L342S mutation also exhibits metabolic phenotypes: he is obese (BMI of 30 kg/m2) with increased fat mass (40% by DEXA, > 97th percentile; Kelly et al, 2009), and severe insulin resistance (evaluated by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp study, low glucose disposal rate at 1.5 mg/kg/min; Bergman et al, 1985).
CHH patients harbor putative pathogenic variants in KLB, encoding the FGF21 co‐receptor β‐Klotho
Targeted sequencing in an unselected cohort of CHH patients (n = 334) revealed no rare sequencing variants (RSVs) in FGF21. In contrast, seven heterozygous putative pathogenic RSVs in KLB were identified among 13 CHH probands: p.R309W, p.R309Q, p.R424C, p.A574T, p.F777delF, p.K815E, p.L1011P (Fig EV1A, Table 1). None of these variants were predicted to affect splicing. The inframe deletion (p.F777delF) was identified in seven unrelated patients of European ancestry and was not seen in our in‐house reproductively normal controls (n = 191). Recurrent pathogenic variants are uncommon in CHH, except for a few founder mutations such as PROKR2 p.L173R, GNRH1 c.18‐19insA, and GNRHR p.R139H (Bouligand et al, 2009; Avbelj Stefanija et al, 2012; Beneduzzi et al, 2014; Choi et al, 2015). Haplotype analysis based on sequence variants within KLB was insufficiently informative to distinguish between a founder effect and a mutational hot spot for p.F777delF. This variant is significantly more frequent in the CHH cohort compared to ethnically matched controls from ExAC database (P = 0.01), as are the other KLB mutations except p.R309W and p.K815E (Table 1). In addition, none of the identified KLB variants were found in a homozygous status in the ExAC database.
Table 1.
KLB mutations | Nucleotide change | Number of subjects | MAF ExAC | P‐value | SIFT/PPH2 | In vitro studies | Rescue assay in Caenorhabditis elegans | Interpretation ACMG guidelines | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHH (n = 334) | Control (n = 191) | FGF21 signaling | Cell surface expression | Overall expression | Maturation level | |||||||
p.R309W | c.925C>T | 1 | 0 | 8.9e10−5 | 0.07 | 2/2 | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | None | Likely pathogenic |
p.R309Q | c.926G>A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 1/2 | ↓ | ↓ | NS | NS | Partial | Likely pathogenic |
p.R424C | c.1270C>T | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 1/2 | ↓ | NS | NS | ↓ | Partial | Likely pathogenic |
p.A574T | c.1720G>A | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 1/2 | ↓ | ↑ | NS | NS | Partial | Likely pathogenic |
p.F777delF | c.2329delTTC | 7 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.01 | NA | ↓ | ↓ | NS | NS | None | Pathogenic |
p.K815E | c.2443A>G | 1 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.57 | 2/2 | ↓ | ↓ | NS | ↓ | Partial | Likely pathogenic |
p.L1011P | c.3032T>C | 1 | 0 | 6.0e10−5 | 0.049 | 2/2 | ↓ | ↓ | NS | ↓ | None | Uncertain significance |
CHH, congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; MAF, minor allele frequency; P‐value, Fisher's exact test of allele frequency in CHH cohort versus ethnically matched controls from ExAC database; PPH2, polyphen‐2; ↓, decreased; ↑, increased; NS, not significant. ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (Richards et al, 2015).
KLB variants have impaired functionality in vitro
The functional effect of the identified KLB variants on FGF21 signaling was tested via cell‐based reporter gene assay (Raivio et al, 2009). L6 myoblast cells expressing wild‐type (WT) FGFR1c and KLB showed a typical sigmoid dose–response curve and elicited a fourfold increase in the activity of the osteocalcin reporter when treated with increasing doses of rFGF21 (0–20 nM; Fig 2A and B). All mutants, except R309W, exhibited significantly decreased maximal response to FGF21 compared to WT (P < 0.05; Fig 2A and B); R309W exhibited a threefold increase in EC50 compared to WT (0.52 M vs. 0.15 M, P < 0.001), suggesting a decreased affinity for FGF21.
Through biochemical studies, we have previously shown that KLB enhances FGF21‐FGFR1c binding and hence promotes FGF21 signaling by simultaneously tethering FGF21 and FGFR1c to itself through two distinct sites (Goetz et al, 2012). To test whether the reduced FGF21 signaling was due to a significant defect in the receptor complex formation, we tested the interaction between KLB mutants and FGFR1c through a co‐immunoprecipitation (co‐IP) assay. All of the KLB mutants co‐precipitated with FGFR1c to the same extent as the wild‐type KLB (Fig 2C), indicating that the KLB mutants do not exhibit a major defect in the binding to FGFR1.
Overall expression levels of the KLB mutants were similar to WT except for R309W which was slightly decreased vs. WT (Fig EV1B). However, the mature KLB fractions of R309W, R424C, K815E, and L1011P were decreased (Fig EV1B), suggesting defects in protein glycosylation. The R309W, R309Q, F777delF, K815E, and L1011P mutants exhibited significantly less cell surface expression compared to WT (Fig 2D), consistent with their impaired signaling (Fig 2A and B). Collectively, our in vitro studies showed decreased function of the KLB mutants either through reduction in signaling, ligand affinity, or expression. Furthermore, the KLB F777delF and FGFR1 R78C mutants co‐occurring in Subject 9 (Table 2) were further tested using the same FGF reporter assay to model the effect of digenicity in the FGFR1 pathway. While the individual KLB F777delF or FGFR1 R78C mutants each evoked a decreased response (15 and 20%, respectively, P < 0.05), the pairing of the co‐receptor/receptor mutants showed further decreased activity (35%), confirming an additive effect of the digenic mutation (P < 0.05, Fig 2E).
Table 2.
Subject | KLB mutation | Sex | Age at Dx | Inheritance | Puberty | Olfaction | Additional reproductive phenotypes | BMI (kg/m2) | Metabolic phenotypes | Other CHH gene mutations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1a | p.R309W | M | 25 | F | A | A | Cryptorchidism | 40 | Obesity, insulin resistance | None |
2 | p.R309Q | M | 28 | F | P | A | None | 25 | Impaired fasting glucose | FGF8 p.P26L |
3 | p.R424C | M | 31 | F | A | A | Cryptorchidism | 28 | Overweight | None |
4 | p.A574T | M | 19 | F | A | N | Micropenis | 22 | Impaired fasting glucose, dyslipidemia | PROKR2 p.S188L |
5 | p.F777delF | F | 18 | F | A | N | None | 23 | NA | GNRHR p.Q106R |
6 | p.F777delF | F | 16 | F | A | H | None | 17 | Underweight | None |
7 | p.F777delF | M | 18 | F | A | A | Cryptorchidism, micropenis | 43 | Obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia | None |
8 | p.F777delF | M | 19 | S | P | A | Reversal | 21 | Dyslipidemia | None |
9 | p.F777delF | M | 16 | S | A | A | Micropenis, retractile testes | 25 | Overweight, dyslipidemia | FGFR1 p.R78C |
10 | p.F777delF | M | 25 | S | A | A | Cryptorchidism | 26 | Overweight | None |
11a | p.F777delF | M | 16 | S | A | A | Hypospadias, cryptorchidism | 20 | Insulin resistance | PROKR2 p.L173R |
12 | p.K815E | M | 53 | S | P | A | Fertile eunuch | 22 | None | None |
13 | p.L1011P | M | 19 | F | P | A | Micropenis | 20 | NA | None |
Sex: F, female; M, male; Dx, diagnosis; Inheritance: F, familial; S, sporadic; Puberty: A, absent; P, partial; Olfaction: A, anosmia; N, normosmia; H, hyposmia; NA, not available.
Subjects from the exome cohort..
KLB mutants fail to rescue KLB homolog function in Caenorhabditis elegans
To investigate the functional effect of KLB mutations in vivo, we performed rescue assays in C. elegans (Neumann‐Haefelin et al, 2010). The role of FGFR and klotho proteins as regulators of metabolic homeostasis is evolutionarily conserved in the nematode C. elegans (Kokel et al, 1998; Polanska et al, 2011). Caenorhabditis elegans has a single FGFR homolog, egl‐15 (DeVore et al, 1995) and two Klotho/KLB homologs, klo‐1 and klo‐2 (Polanska et al, 2011). Double mutants of klo‐1 (ok2925) and klo‐2 (ok1862) are viable but subfertile with a reduction of ~40% in egg laying compared to WT. In addition, these worms display a fluid homeostasis phenotype, manifesting as the appearance of hollow cysts within the body cavity in 31% of animals (n = 174, Fig 2F and G); this phenotype is presumably related to the role of klo‐1 in excretory canal development in C. elegans (Polanska et al, 2011). Transgenic expression of wild‐type human KLB under the control of 5ʹ upstream sequences (referred to as “promoter”) of either the C. elegans klo‐1 or klo‐2 was able to rescue the worm klo‐2; klo‐1 double mutant phenotype (Fig 2F and G). In contrast, transgenic expression of human KLB containing F777delF, R309W, or L1011P mutations under the control of the klo‐1 promoter failed to rescue the cyst phenotype (Fig 2G). All other mutants displayed decreased rescue ability (Fig 2G).
In summary, all KLB variants have impaired functionality in vitro and in vivo, and can thus be considered mutations (Table 1). Integrating evidence from population data, computational algorithms, functional assays, and segregation data according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG; Richards et al, 2015; Li & Wang, 2017), all KLB variants except p.L1011P were classified as “pathogenic” or “probably pathogenic”, while p.L1011P as “variant of uncertain significance” (Table 1).
Genotype–Phenotype correlations
The clinical data of the 11 male and two female CHH patients with KLB mutations are summarized in Table 2 and Fig 3. Five cases were sporadic while the remainder (8/13, 62%) exhibited a familial inheritance, which is twice the known overall frequency of familial cases in CHH (30%; Raivio et al, 2009).
The majority of patients (7 males, 2 females) presented with absent puberty and micropenis and/or cryptorchidism in males—phenotypes consistent with severe GnRH deficiency; four patients exhibited partial puberty, indicating less severe GnRH deficiency. One patient underwent spontaneous reversal after discontinuing testosterone treatment (Patient 8; Raivio et al, 2007). The majority of patients (11/13) had abnormal olfaction and were thus diagnosed as KS. In addition, nine of 13 of these young CHH patients had metabolic phenotypes, including overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and/or insulin resistance; one patient was underweight at diagnosis (Table 2). Among the seven patients carrying the p.F777delF mutation, only one had partial puberty and reversal of HH. This patient carries only the KLB mutation (Table 2). Additional CHH‐associated phenotypes were highly variable with polydactyly, renal phenotypes, synkinesia, or cleft lip and palate present in one patient each (Appendix Case Reports).
DNA from family members was available for 10 pedigrees, none of which revealed de novo mutations. Variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance, common features in CHH, were observed in families harboring KLB mutations: family members in pedigrees 2, 4, and 6 carry the same KLB mutation as the proband yet exhibit attenuated phenotypes (delayed puberty or isolated anosmia), indicating variable expressivity. Asymptomatic carriers are present in families 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 13. Five probands (35%) were found to carry another heterozygous mutation in a known CHH gene in addition to the KLB mutation (Fig 3, Table 2), comprising FGF8 (Subject 2), PROKR2 (Subjects 4 and 11), GNRHR (Subject 5), and FGFR1 (Subject 9). Additional mutations were not observed in our in‐house control subjects (n = 191). The additional mutations are predicted to be deleterious in silico and four of five have been previously shown to be loss of function in vitro (Appendix Case Reports). Within the families with mutations in two different genes (Pedigree 4 and 5), we observed a more severe phenotype in the probands with digenic mutations compared to their parents with single gene defects. Further, among the four probands with partial GnRH deficiency, three patients carry heterozygous KLB mutation alone. These observations suggest that some degree of oligogenicity is present in this population and that the genetic load may impact the phenotypic severity. Metabolic data were not available for family members, and therefore, we are unable to assess these features in family members carrying KLB mutations.
Considering the broader FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 gene network in this CHH cohort, 38 FGFR1 mutations were identified (including a homozygous one) in 45 of 334 (13%) of patients (Appendix Table S1); these include the patient (Subject 9) carrying heterozygous mutations in KLB and FGFR1 mentioned above (Table 2). Thus, in total, 57 of 334 (17%) of CHH patients harbor mutation(s) in FGF21/KLB/FGFR1, either as monoallelic mutations or as digenic combinations.
Klb‐deficient mice exhibit delayed puberty and subfertility due to a hypothalamic defect
To further establish the role of Klb in GnRH biology, we studied the reproductive phenotype of Klb knockout mice (KlbKO). In the C57BL/6J pure background, we observed a high neonatal mortality of KlbKO mice (KlbKO represented 5–10% of the litters versus the 25% expected from heterozygous breeding pairs). The KlbKO mice exhibited marked delay of vaginal opening and first estrus (Fig 4A and B), measures of the initiation and completion of puberty, respectively. Notably, KlbKO mice displayed reduced growth, with a lower weight that persists in adulthood (Fig 4C and D). However, the reduced weight alone did not explain the delayed puberty, as KlbKO females reached puberty at a significantly lower weight than WT (Fig EV2A and B). Uterine weight, body composition, food intake, energy expenditure, and glucose tolerance were similar to WT (Figs 4E and EV2C–J). Serum insulin, leptin, and cholesterol levels were normal (Fig EV2K–L).
In accordance with their reduced ovarian weight (normalized to total body weight) and their decreased number of corpora lutea (Fig 4F–I), KlbKO adult females of 3–4 months old had irregular estrous cycles compared to their WT counterparts, with a significant decrease of the time spent in estrous (Fig 4J–K). In addition, KlbKO mice displayed reduced fertility compared to WT mice, yielding significantly fewer litters in the continuous mating protocol fertility test breeding with WT males (Fig 4L).
The exposure of WT female mice to sexually mature male pheromones leads to the initiation of proestrus, including increased hypothalamic secretion of GnRH and a preovulatory LH surge (Bronson & Stetson, 1973). In contrast, KlbKO females exhibit a substantially blunted LH surge compared to WT (Fig 4M). Intraperitoneal (IP) GnRH injections elicited a robust rise in LH in both WT and KlbKO mice, excluding a pituitary defect (Fig 4N). Furthermore, IP Kisspeptin (Kp‐10) injections also induced LH secretion in both in WT and KlbKO females, suggesting that GnRH neurons are present and can respond to stimulation (Fig 4O). These results illustrate an implication of Klb in hypothalamic GnRH secretion, consistent with a contribution of Klb to the central regulation of reproduction.
As KLB mutations are heterozygous in CHH patients, we further tested whether Klb heterozygous (KlbHET) female mice display a reproductive phenotype. We observed that KlbHET exhibited similar reproductive defects as KlbKO mice: disrupted estrous cycle (Fig EV3A and B) and blunted LH surge at the estrus stage (Fig EV3C–F). In addition, the short‐term fertility test showed a reduced pregnancy rate in KlbHET females, indicating a fertility defect (Fig EV3G). These findings indicate that haploinsufficiency for Klb leads to significant reproductive defects in mice.
Klb is implicated in GnRH biology in the postnatal period but not during embryonic development
To further explore the defect of GnRH secretion in KlbKO mice, we first localized and quantified the GnRH neuron population in adult brains (P90–180). A normal complement of hypothalamic GnRH neurons and axonal projections to the median eminence (ME) was found in KlbKO mice (Fig 5A–C), indicating normal embryonic GnRH neurons development. We next investigated the hypothalamic expression of Gnrh and other genes known to be important for puberty and GnRH biology (i.e., Kiss1, Npy, Pomc, and Lepr); expression of these genes was not altered in KlbKO mice (Fig EV4A and B). Finally, we found no alteration in GnRH vesicular pool at the nerve terminals in KlbKO mice (Fig EV4C), indicating that GnRH peptide synthesis and transport are not affected. These results indicate that Klb deficiency cause a defect in GnRH neuron homeostasis rather than development.
We further characterized the spatiotemporal expression pattern of Fgfr1 and Klb in embryonic and postnatal tissues critical for GnRH neuron biology, as well as in immortalized GnRH cell lines (Gn11 and GT1‐7 cells; Fig 5D and E). As expected, Fgfr1 expression was high in the immature Gn11 cells as well as in embryonic tissues. Postnatally, Fgfr1 expression increased in the POA at weaning and persisted into adulthood (Fig 5D). Notably, Klb expression did not parallel Fgfr1 expression, in that it was very low to absent in the embryonic brain and nose (Fig 5E). In contrast, higher levels of Klb were identified in the POA at birth and persisted until weaning with a further increase in adulthood (Fig 5E). These results further support a role of FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 signaling in the postnatal modulation of GnRH biology rather than embryonic development, which has previously been associated with FGF8/FGFR1 signaling.
FGF21 stimulates neurite outgrowth in mature GnRH neurons in vitro and induces GnRH secretion in ME explants ex vivo
The cyclic release of GnRH peptide during the ovarian cycle in the pituitary portal system requires periodic neuroglial remodeling by molecules such as semaphorins and nitric oxide in the adult ME (De Seranno et al, 2004; Prevot et al, 2010; Giacobini et al, 2014; Parkash et al, 2015). FGF21 has recently been shown to be able to promote neurite outgrowth in vitro (Huang et al, 2013). Consistently, we found that recombinant FGF21 (rFGF21) increased neurite length in mature immortalized GnRH neurons (GT1‐7) in vitro (Fig 6A–C). To investigate the possibility that FGF21 may also act directly on GnRH neurons to modulate their function in vivo, we isolated GnRH neurons from adult Gnrh::gfp mice using fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) and analyzed Klb expression. A twofold enrichment of Klb transcripts was found in GnRH neurons (Fig 6D). To further explore the role of FGF21 on GnRH neuronal function, we studied the effects of rFGF21 treatment on GnRH secretion in living ME explants obtained from WT and KlbKO mice. Exogenous rFGF21 promoted robust GnRH release in a dose‐dependent manner in WT mice, but not in KlbKO mice (Fig 6E). These results thus raise the possibility that peripheral FGF21 modulates GnRH secretion by acting directly on GnRH neuroendocrine terminals in the ME.
Peripheral FGF21 reaches GnRH neurons through fenestrated vessels of ME or OVLT in vivo
We next examined whether peripheral FGF21 could reach hypothalamic GnRH neurons in vivo. Fluorescently labeled rFGF21 was injected intravenously to Gnrh::gfp mice 1 min before sacrifice. At this short interval, fluorescent rFGF21 was seen in the parenchyma of the ME and the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT; Figs 6F and G, and EV5), where GnRH nerve terminals and GnRH dendrites are, respectively, distributed and extend beyond the blood–brain barrier (BBB; Ciofi et al, 2009; Herde et al, 2011). While circulating fluorescent rFGF21 remained trapped in the capillaries of the BBB (empty arrowheads, Fig 6F and G), it extravasated from the fenestrated vessels of the OVLT and the ME (Figs 6F and G, and EV5). GnRH neuroendocrine terminals in the external zone of the ME were seen to be surrounded by bloodborne fluorescent rFGF21 flooding the ME (arrows, Figs 6G and EV5). GnRH dendrites in the OVLT were found to be able to capture this circulating fluorescent rFGF21 and transport it toward the respective GnRH cell bodies (arrows, Figs 6F and EV5). Altogether, morphological data suggest that hypothalamic GnRH neurons can readily have access to peripheral FGF21.
Discussion
Reproductive fitness is known to be tightly linked to energy availability, although the exact molecular mechanisms are still unknown (Bronson, 1986; Cahill, 2006). The hepatokine FGF21, a key central metabolic regulator (Liang et al, 2014; Owen et al, 2015), may constitute such a link between metabolism and reproduction. Our finding of KLB mutations impairing FGF21 signaling in patients with congenital GnRH deficiency with a high frequency of associated metabolic defects supports this concept. Studies of Klb‐deficient mice, which exhibit delayed puberty and subfertility partly due to a hypothalamic defect, are consistent with a role of Fgf21 in regulating reproduction. A previous report showed that Fgf21 transgenic mice exhibit GnRH deficiency with infertility by repressing the vasopressin–kisspeptin pathway (Owen et al, 2013). Thus, both deficiency and excesses of FGF21 may lead to defects in GnRH function, consistent with the concept that a tightly regulated energy balance is required for optimal reproductive capacity.
While no CHH patients were found to harbor mutation in FGF21, 4% exhibit heterozygous mutations in KLB. All KLB mutants were confirmed to be loss of function in vitro as well as in vivo using a rescue assay in C. elegans. Notably, the p.F777delF mutation is found in seven probands of European descent. Although this variant is present in one out of 133 non‐Finnish European controls (0.7%) in the ExAC database, it is significantly enriched in our CHH cohort versus controls. As most mutations in CHH are private, this occurrence suggests either a mutational hot spot or a founder effect (Avbelj Stefanija et al, 2012; Choi et al, 2015). The clinical spectrum ranges from severe GnRH deficiency with micropenis and cryptorchidism to milder forms such as CHH with reversal or fertile eunuch syndrome. This phenotypic variability is also observed among the seven CHH probands harboring the p.F777delF mutation, suggesting that other genetic or environmental factors may contribute to the phenotype. Additional mutations in other CHH genes were indeed found in five out of 13 patients (38%) including three patients with the p.F777delF mutation; this is compatible with an oligogenic model of inheritance that has been firmly established for other CHH genes (Sykiotis et al, 2010; Quaynor et al, 2011; Miraoui et al, 2013). To date, there remain 50% of CHH patients for whom no pathogenic mutation is known (Boehm et al, 2015), suggesting that additional mutations in currently unknown genes remain to be discovered.
Metabolic defects have been previously described in CHH patients and are thought to be secondary to sex steroid deficiency leading to unfavorable changes in body composition and inflammation (Zitzmann, 2009). Indeed, these metabolic parameters usually improve after initiation of sex hormone replacement therapy (Tripathy et al, 1998; Naharci et al, 2007; Bayram et al, 2016). Further, short‐term discontinuation of androgen therapy in male CHH patients leads to mild insulin resistance and increased glucose levels (Yialamas et al, 2007). Thus, unlike neurosensory hearing loss or anosmia, metabolic defects are not typically considered as primary events in CHH, apart from syndromic CHH caused by LEP, LEPR, or PCSK1 mutations resulting in both GnRH deficiency and morbid obesity (Jackson et al, 1997; Farooqi et al, 2002, 2007). Leptin deficiency or resistance leads to a lack of metabolic cues that signal to the hypothalamus to regulate both energy homeostasis and fertility (Chehab, 2014). Here, we show that a majority of patients with KLB mutations (9/13) exhibit hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with some degree of metabolic defect (i.e. overweight, insulin resistance, and/or dyslipidemia), consistent with the metabolic role of FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 pathway. However, systematic metabolic phenotyping at diagnosis and after sex steroid replacement is required to firmly establish this association.
While Fgfr1 is widely expressed in the brain, Klb expression is more restricted spatially and temporally, thus delimiting Fgf21 signaling (Bookout et al, 2013). We found that Klb mRNA was barely detectable during embryonic development in the head and nose, but it increased significantly after birth and maintained in adult/mature GnRH neurons, supporting a postnatal role of FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 signaling in GnRH biology. Consistent with the temporal pattern of Klb expression, we found that KlbKO mice had normal embryonic GnRH neuron development but exhibited delay puberty, disrupted cyclicity, and subfertility with an impaired GnRH function. The reproductive defects in the KlbKO mice are less severe than the phenotypes observed in our CHH patients with heterozygous KLB mutations. This phenotypic discrepancy between human and mice has been previously reported for other CHH genes like TACR3 and NSMF (Yang et al, 2012; Quaynor et al, 2015). Notably, a similar reproductive phenotype was observed in KlbHET mice, indicating that Klb haploinsufficiency causes reproductive defects. This finding provides further evidence for a pathogenic role of the heterozygous KLB mutations in human, likely through the mechanism of haploinsufficiency.
In the adult hypothalamus, cyclic GnRH secretion is modulated by an interactive plasticity involving GnRH neuron terminals, tanycytes, and endothelial cells through locally secreted molecules such as semaphorins and nitric oxide (De Seranno et al, 2004; Giacobini et al, 2014; Parkash et al, 2015). While the role of FGF21 in the GnRH system was previously reported to suppress GnRH upstream signals such as vasopressin and kisspeptin (Owen et al, 2013), recent studies have shown that FGF21 may play a role in neuronal protection and neuronal plasticity (Huang et al, 2013; Leng et al, 2015). Our findings that FGF21 promotes neurite outgrowth in mature immortalized GnRH neurons (GT1‐7) and stimulates GnRH secretion in living ME explants suggest a novel role for FGF21 in controlling fertility by modulating GnRH neuron structural plasticity. Further studies are warranted to define the exact mechanism of FGF21 action on neuroglial–endothelial plasticity in vivo and its physiological relevance for the GnRH system. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)‐derived GnRH neurons (Lund et al, 2016; Poliandri et al, 2017) from CHH patients with KLB mutations would be an excellent model to elucidate how the human KLB mutants affect GnRH secretion.
Similar to leptin‐sensitive neurons in the arcuate nucleus (Djogo et al, 2016; Pan & Myers, 2016), GnRH neurons extend their dendrites and terminals outside the blood–brain barrier (Ciofi et al, 2009; Herde et al, 2011). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that GnRH neurons can also directly sense circulating metabolic signals. Leptin and insulin apparently do not act in this way, because GnRH neurons do not express leptin receptors (Quennell et al, 2009) and GnRH neuron‐specific deletion of the insulin receptor does not lead to any reproductive defects (Evans et al, 2014). Our diffusion studies show that peripheral Fgf21 does not freely cross the BBB, but rather extravasates quickly from the fenestrated capillaries in the ME and the OVLT to gain direct access to GnRH neuronal dendrites and terminals lying outside the BBB (Ciofi et al, 2009; Herde et al, 2011). Taken together with our findings that Klb and Fgfr1 are expressed in GnRH neurons, and that FGF21 stimulates GnRH secretion in ME ex vivo, it is likely that GnRH neuron terminals outside the BBB may perceive peripheral FGF21 promptly and efficiently to adapt GnRH secretion according to the metabolic state of the individual. It will thus be interesting to evaluate the FGF21 gene network for mutations in patients with functional hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (i.e., hypothalamic amenorrhea (Gordon, 2010) and obesity‐related hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; Giagulli et al, 1994), as environmental cues related to energy balance are critical for reproductive fitness.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
The cohort includes 334 unselected probands with CHH (227 KS and 107 normosmic CHH, with 3:1 male–female ratio) along with affected and unaffected family members when available. The diagnosis of CHH includes: (i) absent or incomplete puberty by age 16; (ii) low/normal gonadotropin levels in the setting of low serum testosterone/estradiol levels; and (iii) otherwise normal anterior pituitary function and normal imaging of the hypothalamic–pituitary area (Pitteloud et al, 2002). Olfaction was assessed by self‐report and/or formal testing (Lewkowitz‐Shpuntoff et al, 2012). Metabolic assessments include BMI, fasting glucose and insulin levels, homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR; Tam et al, 2012), and lipid profile at presentation. Additionally, one patient underwent a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp as previously described (Pitteloud et al, 2005). The controls include 191 in‐house reproductively healthy subjects of non‐Finnish European origin (Raivio et al, 2009).
Genetic studies
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using previously described methods (Miraoui et al, 2013). The coding exons and intronic splice regions (≤ 6 bp from the exons) of FGF21 (NM_019113.2) and KLB (NM_175737) were analyzed by exome (n = 83) or Sanger sequencing (n = 251). Exome capture was performed using the SureSelect All Exon capture (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA) and sequenced on the HiSeq2500 (Illumina, San Diego CA USA). Raw sequences (fastq files) were analyzed using an in‐house pipeline that utilizes published algorithms: the Burrows‐Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA; Li & Durbin, 2009) for mapping the reads to the human reference sequence (GRCh37), and the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK; DePristo et al, 2011) for the detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (Indels). The resulting variants for both exome and Sanger sequences were annotated using SnpEff version 4.0 (Cingolani et al, 2012) and dbNSFP version 2.9 (Liu et al, 2013) to calculate minor allele frequency (MAF) and protein functional predictions.
A putative pathogenic variant is defined as (i) non‐synonymous rare variant with MAF < 1% in both our in‐house controls (n = 191; Raivio et al, 2009) and ethnically matched controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org); (ii) nonsense, frameshift, inframe insertion/deletion, splicing variants (predicted to affect splicing by at least two out three programs including Human Splice Finder (Desmet et al, 2009), MaxEnt (Desmet et al, 2009), and NNSplice (Reese et al, 1997), or missense variants predicted to be damaging by either SIFT (Ng & Henikoff, 2001) and Polyphen‐2 (Adzhubei et al, 2010). A putative pathogenic variant is confirmed as a mutation when shown to be loss of function in functional assays (see below). ACMG guidelines for interpretation of sequencing variants (Richards et al, 2015; Li & Wang, 2017) were also applied to assess the pathogenicity of identified variants.
All subjects were also screened for known CHH genes via Sanger (n = 251) or by exome sequencing (n = 83): [KAL1 (NM_000216.2), FGFR1 (NM_023110.2), FGF8 (NM_033163.3), PROKR2 (NM_144773.2), PROK2 (NM_001126128.13), GNRHR (NM_000406.2), GNRH1 (NM_000825.3), KISS1R (NM_032551.4), KISS1 (NM_002256.3), TACR3 (NM_001059.2), TAC3 (NM_013251.3), NSMF (NM_001130969.1), HS6ST1 (NM_004807.2), DUSP6 (NM_001946.2), FGF17 (NM_003867.2), FLRT3 (NM_198391.2), IL17RD (NM_017563.3), and SPRY4 (NM_030964.3)]. Variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing of both strands and with duplicate PCRs, and are described according to HGVS nomenclature (den Dunnen & Antonarakis, 2000).
The clinical and genetic studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Partners Healthcare and the ethics committee of the University of Lausanne, and were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent prior to study participation. Our datasets were obtained from subjects who have consented to the use of their individual clinical and genetic data for biomedical research, but not for unlimited public data release. Therefore, we submitted the data to the European Genome‐phenome Archive (EGAS00001002568), and researchers can apply for access to the raw data.
Functional studies
Generation of KLB expression constructs
Human KLB cDNA in pCR4‐TOPO vector (Plasmid ID HsCD00341606, Harvard Medical School) was used to generate constructs with N‐terminus flag‐tagged and C‐terminus HA‐tagged KLB cDNA in pcDNA3.1 + vector, which were further used as template for mutagenesis using QuikChange II XL Site‐Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technology).
FGF8/FGF21 signaling studies
Signaling activity of FGFR1 and KLB mutants was assessed using the osteocalcin FGF response element luciferase in a L6 myoblast cell model. L6 cells (sourced from ATCC) were transiently transfected with N‐terminus myc‐tagged FGFR1 cDNA as previously described (Raivio et al, 2009), and HA‐tagged KLB cDNA expression vector was added to the DNA mix when appropriate. 24 h post‐transfection, cells were treated with recombinant FGF8 or FGF21 (16 h, 0–20 nM, except for double mutant assay 0–10 nM) as indicated and subsequently analyzed for luciferase activity. In each experiment, FGFR1 and KLB mutant values were expressed as a percentage of the maximal WT response and plotted with three‐parameter agonist dose–response curves using Prism software (version 7; GraphPad). Transfection assays were performed in triplicate and repeated three times. The activity of each KLB/FGFR1 mutant was compared to WT in terms of EC50 dose and the maximal FGF response.
Co‐immunoprecipitation assay
HEK293T cells (sourced from ATCC) were transiently transfected with N‐terminus flag‐tagged KLB and/or myc‐tagged FGFR1 using FuGENE® 6 Transfection Reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. 48 h after transfection cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH8, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X‐100) supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Clarified lysates were immunoprecipitated using monoclonal anti‐flag (Sigma‐Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Precipitated proteins were processed as previously described (Bouilly et al, 2014). KLB was revealed using mice monoclonal anti‐flag (Sigma‐Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and FGFR1 was detected using mice monoclonal anti‐myc (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Experiments were repeated twice with consistent results.
Ectopic protein expression and glycosylation analysis
The expression and maturation studies were performed in COS7 cells (sourced from ATCC) transiently transfected with C‐terminus HA‐tagged WT or mutated KLB constructs. As β‐Klotho is an N‐linked glycosylated protein, cell lysates were further subjected to enzymatic deglycosylation with peptide N‐glycosidase F (PNGase F) and endoglycosidase H (EndoH), as described (Raivio et al, 2009). After deglycosylation, cell lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis using anti‐HA primary antibody (1:2,000; Sigma‐Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and rabbit anti‐mouse HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody (1:20,000, Invitrogen). Total protein abundance was calculated from the PNGase F‐treated samples (~120 kDa), and the maturity index was calculated as the fraction of the mature (i.e. EndoH‐resistant band, 140‐kDa) to the total protein using the ImageJ program (Wayne Rasband, NIH, USA). Three independent experiments were performed in quadruplicate.
Cell surface antibody binding assay
COS7 cells were transiently transfected with N‐terminus flag‐tagged KLB constructs and analyzed for KLB expression on the cell surface using an anti‐flag antibody (1:1,500) and [125I]‐rabbit anti‐mouse IgG (300,000 cpm/well; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) as previously reported (Raivio et al, 2009). Samples were run in quadruplicate and the experiment repeated three times.
Caenorhabditis elegans studies
Caenorhabditis elegans strains were maintained at 20°C as described (Brenner, 1974). The single mutant alleles klo‐2 (ok1862; Polanska et al, 2011) and klo‐1 (ok2925) were generated by the C. elegans Knockout Consortium, and strains carrying these alleles were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Centre (CGC), and backcrossed at least three to five times prior to analysis. Both alleles are presumed null. TC446 is a double mutant of ok1862 and ok2925 and was generated by standard genetic crossing.
The huKLB constructs were derived from the plasmids pTK37 (pklo‐1::gfp) and pTK53 (pklo‐2::gfp; Polanska et al, 2011). Sequences encoding for wild‐type human KLB and the F777del variant cDNAs were cloned downstream of klo‐1 and klo‐2 promoter sequences, removing sequences encoding for GFP present in the original plasmids pTK37 and pTK53, but retaining the unc‐54 3'UTR. Since both promoters gave similar results, the rest of the mutant human KLB cDNAs were cloned similarly downstream of the klo‐1 promoter in pTK37. All DNA constructs were confirmed by sequencing. Transgenic arrays were generated using standard germ line transformation techniques (Mello et al, 1991). DNA constructs were injected to klo‐2 (ok1862); klo‐1 (ok2925) double mutant C. elegans, at 20 ng/μl with Ptph‐1::mCherry at 40 ng/μl as injection marker and pBluescript. Two to five independent transgenic lines were analyzed for each DNA construct. Fluorescent and DIC images were acquired using Zeiss AxioCam MRm camera mounted on Zeiss Axioskop2 or Zeiss Axioimager Z1 microscopes equipped with epifluorescence and DIC optics. Images were captured using Axiovision/Zen and further cropped and scaled using Adobe Photoshop CS4.
Mouse studies
Housing
The generation and genotyping of KlbKO mice, kindly provided by Prof. Nabeshima, was previously described (Ito et al, 2005), and all animals used in this study were backcrossed onto a pure C57BL/6J background for more than 10 generations. KlbKO mice were obtained from heterozygous breeding pairs, and KlbHET mice were obtained from heterozygous wild‐type breeding pairs. After weaning at 21 days of age, all mice were housed at room temperature (22°C) with a 12‐h‐light/12‐h‐dark cycle and free access to water and food.
Reproductive assessment
To assess puberty, post‐weaning female mice were inspected daily to measure body weight and determine vaginal opening. Day of first estrus was determined after vaginal opening by daily cytological analysis of vaginal smears under an inverted microscope.
To study reproductive capacity, estrous cyclicity was monitored in 3‐month‐old females for 4 consecutive weeks by daily cytological analysis of vaginal smears. Blood samples were collected at different estrous cycle stages for LH measurement. To study fertility, a continuous mating protocol was used to measure the number of litters per females and litter size on KlbKO and WT littermates housed in a cage with a confirmed fertile WT male for 7 months. The reproductive capacity of KlbHET mice was assessed by a short‐term fertility test. Briefly, WT and KlbHET females housed together (1:1) were exposed to a confirmed fertile male for 2 nights. To induce proestrus with a preovulatory LH surge, KlbKO and WT females were exposed to bedding enriched with sexually experienced male urine, and sacrificed the evening of the third day of exposure. Blood was collected by intracardiac puncture and immediately placed on ice until plasma separation, and then stored at −80°C until LH measurement by ELISA.
Females underwent GnRH and Kisspeptin testings on the day of first diestrus, and blood samples were collected before and after IP injection of either 0.25 μg GnRH or 1 nmole Kisspeptin (Kp‐10) per mouse. Briefly, 4 μl blood was collected by tail puncture, diluted in PBS Tween 0.05%, immediately frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80°C until LH measurements by ELISA.
To assess ovarian morphology, ovaries from 3‐ to 6‐month‐old KlbKO and WT littermates were collected and weighed, fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution and stored at 4°C until tissue processing. Paraffin‐embedded ovaries were serially sectioned at 5 μm thickness and stained with hematoxylin–eosin (histology facility, University of Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland). Fresh and regressing corpora lutea were counted in every 5th section of an ovary by comparing the section with the preceding and following sections.
Metabolic assessment
Food intake was measured for mice placed in individual cages during at least 3 consecutive days. Lean mass, fat mass, and percent fat were determined on awake mice using an Echo MRI analyzer (Whole Body Composition Analyzer, Echo medical systems, Houston, TX, USA). Females underwent a glucose tolerance test (GTT) after an overnight fast. Glucose (2 mg/g b.w.) was administered intraperitoneally, and glucose levels were determined in tail blood using an ACCU‐CHEK® Aviva blood glucose monitor and appropriate test strip (Roche Diagnostics). Oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and spontaneous locomotor activity were determined using indirect, open‐circuit calorimetry in an Oxymax Metabolic Chamber system (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA). The mice (with free access to food and water) were housed in separate chambers for 48 h for acclimatization before starting 48 h measurements. The average VO2 was calculated during 48 h—two light cycles and two dark cycles (Somm et al, 2005, 2014).
Biochemical studies
Plasma total, HDL‐, and LDL‐cholesterol levels were analyzed using the Cobas C111 automated platform (Roche Diagnostics). Plasma insulin and leptin were measured with the metabolic Milliplex kit (MADKMAG‐71K, Merck Millipore). LH was measured with an in‐house, sensitive, two‐site sandwich immunoassay as previously described (Steyn et al, 2013).
GnRH neuron neuroanatomical analysis
Brains were obtained from adult females by decapitation under deep general anesthesia (100 mg/kg of ketamine HCl and 10 mg/kg xylazine HCl) and preserved as previously described (Messina et al, 2011). Coronal hypothalamic sections were immunofluorescently stained for GnRH neurons using rabbit anti‐GnRH (1:1,000; Immunostar) as primary antibody following a previously reported protocol (Messina et al, 2011). Confocal immunofluorescent imaging was performed using an inverted microscope (Zeiss LSM 780 Quasar), and images were processed using ImageJ and Adobe Photoshop CS5. All slides were coded to blind sample identification prior to analysis of GnRH neurons number and distribution. Neurons were manually counted in each section along the rostro‐caudal axis from the medial septum to the ME. For quantification of GnRH neuron distribution, serial sections were aligned at the OVLT as a common anatomical landmark between samples.
Gene expression analysis
Brain tissues were micro‐dissected on a standard stereo‐microscope under RNase‐free conditions. Total RNA from tissues and cell cultures was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen). Standard protocols were followed for quantifying gene expression. Primers for detecting Hprt, Rps29, Klb, Fgfr1, Gnrh1, Lepr, Kiss1r, Kiss1, Pomc, Avp, and Npy are available in Appendix Table S2. GnRH neurons were isolated by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) from adult GnRH::GFP transgenic mice and gene expression performed as previously reported (Messina et al, 2016) using exon‐boundary‐specific TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems): Gnrh1 (Gnrh1‐Mm01315605_m1), Klb (Klb‐Mm00473122_m1). Control housekeeping genes: r18S (18S‐Hs99999901_s1); Actb (Actb‐Mm00607939_s1).
Median eminence explant cultures and GnRH secretion determination
Adult female mice were sacrificed on the day of diestrus and ME explants were dissected and processed as previously described (Prevot et al, 1999). Conditioned medium was collected after explants were treated with increasing doses of rFGF21 (20 min) or with KCl 0.05 M in order to induce the release of the entire GnRH vesicle pool. Collected media were analyzed for GnRH content following a GnRH ELISA protocol (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals Inc., California, Catalog no. #FEK‐040‐02).
Immortalized GnRH neuron culture and neurite outgrowth assay
Gn11 and GT1‐7 cells (Mellon et al, 1990) were cultured as previously described (Messina et al, 2011). For neurite outgrowth assay, GT1‐7 cells were plated at low density (2.5 × 104 cells/cm2) on poly‐L‐lysine‐coated 24‐well culture plates and treated after adhesion with rFGF21. After 48 h, cells were fixed for 10 min in 4% PFA and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue prior to image acquisition. Neurite tracing was performed following recommended procedures using the ImageJ plugin, NeuronJ (Meijering et al, 2004; Meijering, 2010).
Peripheral injections of fluorescent FGF‐21
Five nanomoles of fluorescent rFGF‐21 (Cisbio Bioassays) were injected into the jugular vein of anesthetized Gnrh::gfp mice. Mice were decapitated 1 min after the injection, and the brain immersion fixed in 4% PFA (0.1 M PBS pH 7.4) for 2 h then placed in the same fixative + 20% sucrose overnight at 4°C. Brains were frozen in liquid nitrogen‐cooled isopentane, and 30‐micrometer‐thick cryostat sections were collected on superfrost glass slides. Blood vessel staining was performed using rabbit anti‐laminin antibody (Sigma AB19012, 1:100).
The mice experimental protocols were performed in accordance with the Swiss animal welfare laws under the authorization of the Service de la consummation et des affaires vétérinaire Vaud (no. VD 2659) and with the approval of Institutional Ethics Committees for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals of the Universities of Lille.
Statistical analysis
For in vitro and in vivo experiments, sample sizes were chosen according to the standard practice in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, all analyses were performed using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software), assessed for normality and variance, and log‐transformed when appropriate. The analysis of differences between the allele frequency of KLB mutations in CHH patients and ExAC controls was performed by Fisher's exact test. For in vitro reporter gene assays, the activity of each FGFR1 or KLB mutant was compared to WT in terms of EC50 dose and the maximal FGF response by F‐test. Expression levels of WT and KLB mutants were compared using an unpaired t‐test. In the C. elegans assay, a two‐tailed Fisher's exact test was used to determine significance between human KLB WT vs. mutants rescue. For comparison of multiple groups with one or two independent variables, statistical significance was determined using one‐ or two‐way ANOVA followed by Fisher's least significant difference post hoc analysis or Sidak's multiple comparisons test. For comparison between two groups of normally distributed data, a paired or unpaired t‐test was used when appropriate. For comparison of event/time curves (i.e. timing of puberty), the Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test was used. Pregnancy frequencies from the short‐term fertility test were compared using chi‐squared test. Unless otherwise indicated, the significance level was set at P < 0.05. Data groups are indicated as mean ± SEM. The exact P‐values of each analysis are listed in Appendix Table S3.
Author contributions
NP, AM, VP, and MT‐S designed research studies. CX, AAD, RQ, CDG, MD, VS, TRC, AAT, JMWK, and WFC participated in patient recruitment and the clinical studies. In addition, WFC contributed data and DNA samples from the Boston patient cohort. CX, JA, DC, GPS, and LP participated in the genetic study and data analysis. CX, HM, NJN, YS, and JB performed in vitro experiments and data analysis. TK performed C. elegans study and data analysis. AM, ES, UA, and VP performed mouse studies and data analysis. MM provided recombinant FGF21. NP, CX, AM, JA, GPS, AAD, MT‐S, VP, and MM participated in writing the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The paper explained.
Problem
Reproduction is regulated by the hypothalamic secretion of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH). Absence of GnRH secretion or action results in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH), a rare genetic disorder characterized by lack of puberty and infertility. Multiple causative genes have been identified for CHH including fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1). FGF21 signals through a receptor complex comprised of FGFR1 and β‐Klotho (encoded by KLB) and acts as a potent regulator of metabolism. Given the close association between energy balance and reproductive fitness, we hypothesize that FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 signaling is implicated in GnRH biology and that mutations in FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 gene network underlie CHH.
Results
Combining human genetics, mouse models, and molecular biology, we identified that 13 of 334 (4%) of CHH probands harbor a heterozygous loss‐of‐function mutation in KLB. No mutations were identified in FGF21. The majority of CHH probands with KLB mutations exhibit metabolic defects. Mice deficient in Klb have delayed sexual maturation and impaired fertility due to a hypothalamic defect. FGF21 enhances GnRH release in vitro. Peripheral FGF21 have a potential to reach the hypothalamic GnRH neuron terminals residing outside of the blood–brain barrier.
Impact
We demonstrate that FGF21/KLB/FGFR1 signaling plays an essential role in GnRH biology and is a novel link between metabolism and reproduction in humans.
For more information
Web resources
GnRH network, http://www.gnrhnetwork.eu/
ExAC database, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/
Ensembl, http://www.ensembl.org/index.html
UCSC Genome Bioinformatics, http://genome.ucsc.edu/
Genome Browser (NCBI), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=Genome
Mouse Genome Informatics website, http://www.informatics.jax.org/
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.omim.org/
Uniprot, http://www.uniprot.org/
Polyphen‐2, http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/
SIFT, http://sift.jcvi.org/
Human Splice Finder, http://www.umd.be/HSF3/
InterVar, http://wintervar.wglab.org/
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the patients and families who contributed their time, medical information, and DNA samples to this study. We thank Prof. Nabeshima (Kyoto University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan) for providing the KlbKO mice, Sarah Gallet and Emilie Caron (Inserm U1172) for expert technical assistance, and Sue Stewart (Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust) for the assistance in patient recruitment. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Sinergia Grant (CRSII3_141960, N. Pitteloud, U. Albrecht and M. Mohammadi); the Swiss National Science Foundation grant (SNF 31003A 153328, N. Pitteloud); the Agence National pour la Recherche (ANR, France) Grant GlioShuttles4Metabolism (ANR‐15‐CE14‐0025, V. Prévot); the grant BFU2014‐57581‐P (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain; co‐funded with EU funds from FEDER Program, M. Tena‐Sempere); the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research at the National Institutes of Health Grant (R01 DE‐13686 to M. Mohammadi); the Harvard Reproductive Endocrine Sciences Center of Excellence in Translational Research in Reproduction & Infertility: The Eunice Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD P50 HD‐28138, W. Crowley).
See also: M Misrahi (October 2017)
References
- Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7: 248–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avbelj Stefanija M, Jeanpierre M, Sykiotis GP, Young J, Quinton R, Abreu AP, Plummer L, Au MG, Balasubramanian R, Dwyer AA et al (2012) An ancient founder mutation in PROKR2 impairs human reproduction. Hum Mol Genet 21: 4314–4324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bayram F, Elbuken G, Korkmaz C, Aydogdu A, Karaca Z, Cakir I (2016) The effects of gonadotropin replacement therapy on metabolic parameters and body composition in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Horm Metab Res 48: 112–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beneduzzi D, Trarbach EB, Min L, Jorge AA, Garmes HM, Renk AC, Fichna M, Fichna P, Arantes KA, Costa EM et al (2014) Role of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor mutations in patients with a wide spectrum of pubertal delay. Fertil Steril 102:838–846.e832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergman RN, Finegood DT, Ader M (1985) Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo . Endocr Rev 6: 45–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boehm U, Bouloux PM, Dattani MT, de Roux N, Dode C, Dunkel L, Dwyer AA, Giacobini P, Hardelin JP, Juul A et al (2015) Expert consensus document: European consensus statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism‐pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11: 547–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bookout AL, de Groot MH, Owen BM, Lee S, Gautron L, Lawrence HL, Ding X, Elmquist JK, Takahashi JS, Mangelsdorf DJ et al (2013) FGF21 regulates metabolism and circadian behavior by acting on the nervous system. Nat Med 19: 1147–1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouilly J, Veitia RA, Binart N (2014) NOBOX is a key FOXL2 partner involved in ovarian folliculogenesis. J Mol Cell Biol 6: 175–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouligand J, Ghervan C, Tello JA, Brailly‐Tabard S, Salenave S, Chanson P, Lombes M, Millar RP, Guiochon‐Mantel A, Young J (2009) Isolated familial hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and a GNRH1 mutation. N Engl J Med 360: 2742–2748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetics 77: 71–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bronson FH, Stetson MH (1973) Gonadotropin release in prepubertal female mice following male exposure: a comparison with the adult cycle. Biol Reprod 9: 449–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bronson FH (1986) Food‐restricted, prepubertal, female rats: rapid recovery of luteinizing hormone pulsing with excess food, and full recovery of pubertal development with gonadotropin‐releasing hormone. Endocrinology 118: 2483–2487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cahill GF Jr (2006) Fuel metabolism in starvation. Annu Rev Nutr 26: 1–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chehab FF (2014) 20 years of leptin: leptin and reproduction: past milestones, present undertakings, and future endeavors. J Endocrinol 223: T37–T48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi JH, Balasubramanian R, Lee PH, Shaw ND, Hall JE, Plummer L, Buck CL, Kottler ML, Jarzabek K, Wolczynski S et al (2015) Expanding the spectrum of founder mutations causing isolated gonadotropin‐releasing hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100: E1378–E1385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chung WC, Moyle SS, Tsai PS (2008) Fibroblast growth factor 8 signaling through fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 is required for the emergence of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology 149: 4997–5003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cingolani P, Platts A, le Wang L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM (2012) A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso‐2; iso‐3. Fly 6: 80–92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciofi P, Garret M, Lapirot O, Lafon P, Loyens A, Prevot V, Levine JE (2009) Brain‐endocrine interactions: a microvascular route in the mediobasal hypothalamus. Endocrinology 150: 5509–5519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa‐Barbosa FA, Balasubramanian R, Keefe KW, Shaw ND, Al‐Tassan N, Plummer L, Dwyer AA, Buck CL, Choi JH, Seminara SB et al (2013) Prioritizing genetic testing in patients with Kallmann syndrome using clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: E943–E953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Seranno S, Estrella C, Loyens A, Cornea A, Ojeda SR, Beauvillain JC, Prevot V (2004) Vascular endothelial cells promote acute plasticity in ependymoglial cells of the neuroendocrine brain. J Neurosci 24: 10353–10363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M et al (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next‐generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43: 491–498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod‐Beroud G, Claustres M, Beroud C (2009) Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 37: e67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeVore DL, Horvitz HR, Stern MJ (1995) An FGF receptor signaling pathway is required for the normal cell migrations of the sex myoblasts in C. elegans hermaphrodites. Cell 83: 611–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djogo T, Robins SC, Schneider S, Kryzskaya D, Liu X, Mingay A, Gillon CJ, Kim JH, Storch KF, Boehm U et al (2016) Adult NG2‐Glia are required for median eminence‐mediated leptin sensing and body weight control. Cell Metab 23: 797–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dode C, Levilliers J, Dupont JM, De Paepe A, Le Du N, Soussi‐Yanicostas N, Coimbra RS, Delmaghani S, Compain‐Nouaille S, Baverel F et al (2003) Loss‐of‐function mutations in FGFR1 cause autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome. Nat Genet 33: 463–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- den Dunnen JT, Antonarakis SE (2000) Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat 15: 7–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans MC, Rizwan M, Mayer C, Boehm U, Anderson GM (2014) Evidence that insulin signalling in gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone and kisspeptin neurones does not play an essential role in metabolic regulation of fertility in mice. J Neuroendocrinol 26: 468–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falardeau J, Chung WC, Beenken A, Raivio T, Plummer L, Sidis Y, Jacobson‐Dickman EE, Eliseenkova AV, Ma J, Dwyer A et al (2008) Decreased FGF8 signaling causes deficiency of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone in humans and mice. J Clin Investig 118: 2822–2831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farooqi IS, Matarese G, Lord GM, Keogh JM, Lawrence E, Agwu C, Sanna V, Jebb SA, Perna F, Fontana S et al (2002) Beneficial effects of leptin on obesity, T cell hyporesponsiveness, and neuroendocrine/metabolic dysfunction of human congenital leptin deficiency. J Clin Investig 110: 1093–1103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farooqi IS, Wangensteen T, Collins S, Kimber W, Matarese G, Keogh JM, Lank E, Bottomley B, Lopez‐Fernandez J, Ferraz‐Amaro I et al (2007) Clinical and molecular genetic spectrum of congenital deficiency of the leptin receptor. N Engl J Med 356: 237–247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fon Tacer K, Bookout AL, Ding X, Kurosu H, John GB, Wang L, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Kuro‐o M, Mangelsdorf DJ et al (2010) Research resource: comprehensive expression atlas of the fibroblast growth factor system in adult mouse. Mol Endocrinol 24: 2050–2064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giacobini P, Parkash J, Campagne C, Messina A, Casoni F, Vanacker C, Langlet F, Hobo B, Cagnoni G, Gallet S et al (2014) Brain endothelial cells control fertility through ovarian‐steroid‐dependent release of semaphorin 3A. PLoS Biol 12: e1001808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giagulli VA, Kaufman JM, Vermeulen A (1994) Pathogenesis of the decreased androgen levels in obese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 997–1000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goetz R, Beenken A, Ibrahimi OA, Kalinina J, Olsen SK, Eliseenkova AV, Xu C, Neubert TA, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ et al (2007) Molecular insights into the klotho‐dependent, endocrine mode of action of fibroblast growth factor 19 subfamily members. Mol Cell Biol 27: 3417–3428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goetz R, Ohnishi M, Ding X, Kurosu H, Wang L, Akiyoshi J, Ma J, Gai W, Sidis Y, Pitteloud N et al (2012) Klotho coreceptors inhibit signaling by paracrine fibroblast growth factor 8 subfamily ligands. Mol Cell Biol 32: 1944–1954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon CM (2010) Clinical practice. Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. N Engl J Med 363: 365–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herde MK, Geist K, Campbell RE, Herbison AE (2011) Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone neurons extend complex highly branched dendritic trees outside the blood‐brain barrier. Endocrinology 152: 3832–3841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X, Hu J, Li Y, Zhuyun Yang Z, Zhu H, Zhou L, Ma K, Schachner M, Xiao Z, Li Y (2013) The cell adhesion molecule L1 regulates the expression of FGF21 and enhances neurite outgrowth. Brain Res 1530: 13–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito S, Fujimori T, Furuya A, Satoh J, Nabeshima Y, Nabeshima Y (2005) Impaired negative feedback suppression of bile acid synthesis in mice lacking betaKlotho. J Clin Investig 115: 2202–2208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson RS, Creemers JW, Ohagi S, Raffin‐Sanson ML, Sanders L, Montague CT, Hutton JC, O'Rahilly S (1997) Obesity and impaired prohormone processing associated with mutations in the human prohormone convertase 1 gene. Nat Genet 16: 303–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly TL, Wilson KE, Heymsfield SB (2009) Dual energy X‐Ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES. PLoS One 4: e7038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokel M, Borland CZ, DeLong L, Horvitz HR, Stern MJ (1998) clr‐1 encodes a receptor tyrosine phosphatase that negatively regulates an FGF receptor signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genes Dev 12: 1425–1437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurosu H, Choi M, Ogawa Y, Dickson AS, Goetz R, Eliseenkova AV, Mohammadi M, Rosenblatt KP, Kliewer SA, Kuro‐o M (2007) Tissue‐specific expression of betaKlotho and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor isoforms determines metabolic activity of FGF19 and FGF21. J Biol Chem 282: 26687–26695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leng Y, Wang Z, Tsai LK, Leeds P, Fessler EB, Wang J, Chuang DM (2015) FGF‐21, a novel metabolic regulator, has a robust neuroprotective role and is markedly elevated in neurons by mood stabilizers. Mol Psychiatry 20: 215–223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewkowitz‐Shpuntoff HM, Hughes VA, Plummer L, Au MG, Doty RL, Seminara SB, Chan YM, Pitteloud N, Crowley WF Jr, Balasubramanian R (2012) Olfactory phenotypic spectrum in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: pathophysiological and genetic implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: E136–E144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows‐Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q, Wang K (2017) InterVar: clinical interpretation of genetic variants by the 2015 ACMG‐AMP Guidelines. Am J Hum Genet 100: 267–280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Q, Zhong L, Zhang J, Wang Y, Bornstein SR, Triggle CR, Ding H, Lam KS, Xu A (2014) FGF21 maintains glucose homeostasis by mediating the cross talk between liver and brain during prolonged fasting. Diabetes 63: 4064–4075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Jian X, Boerwinkle E (2013) dbNSFP v2.0: a database of human non‐synonymous SNVs and their functional predictions and annotations. Hum Mutat 34: E2393–E2402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lund C, Pulli K, Yellapragada V, Giacobini P, Lundin K, Vuoristo S, Tuuri T, Noisa P, Raivio T (2016) Development of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone‐secreting neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 7: 149–157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meijering E, Jacob M, Sarria JC, Steiner P, Hirling H, Unser M (2004) Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry A 58: 167–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meijering E (2010) Neuron tracing in perspective. Cytometry A 77: 693–704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mello CC, Kramer JM, Stinchcomb D, Ambros V (1991) Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J 10: 3959–3970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mellon PL, Windle JJ, Goldsmith PC, Padula CA, Roberts JL, Weiner RI (1990) Immortalization of hypothalamic GnRH neurons by genetically targeted tumorigenesis. Neuron 5: 1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Messina A, Ferraris N, Wray S, Cagnoni G, Donohue DE, Casoni F, Kramer PR, Derijck AA, Adolfs Y, Fasolo A et al (2011) Dysregulation of Semaphorin7A/beta1‐integrin signaling leads to defective GnRH‐1 cell migration, abnormal gonadal development and altered fertility. Hum Mol Genet 20: 4759–4774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Messina A, Langlet F, Chachlaki K, Roa J, Rasika S, Jouy N, Gallet S, Gaytan F, Parkash J, Tena‐Sempere M et al (2016) A microRNA switch regulates the rise in hypothalamic GnRH production before puberty. Nat Neurosci 19: 835–844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miraoui H, Dwyer A, Pitteloud N (2011) Role of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in the neuroendocrine control of human reproduction. Mol Cell Endocrinol 346: 37–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miraoui H, Dwyer AA, Sykiotis GP, Plummer L, Chung W, Feng B, Beenken A, Clarke J, Pers TH, Dworzynski P et al (2013) Mutations in FGF17, IL17RD, DUSP6, SPRY4, and FLRT3 are identified in individuals with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Am J Hum Genet 92: 725–743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naharci MI, Pinar M, Bolu E, Olgun A (2007) Effect of testosterone on insulin sensitivity in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Endocr Pract 13: 629–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neumann‐Haefelin E, Kramer‐Zucker A, Slanchev K, Hartleben B, Noutsou F, Martin K, Wanner N, Ritter A, Godel M, Pagel P et al (2010) A model organism approach: defining the role of Neph proteins as regulators of neuron and kidney morphogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 19: 2347–2359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ng PC, Henikoff S (2001) Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res 11: 863–874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogawa Y, Kurosu H, Yamamoto M, Nandi A, Rosenblatt KP, Goetz R, Eliseenkova AV, Mohammadi M, Kuro‐o M (2007) BetaKlotho is required for metabolic activity of fibroblast growth factor 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 7432–7437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owen BM, Bookout AL, Ding X, Lin VY, Atkin SD, Gautron L, Kliewer SA, Mangelsdorf DJ (2013) FGF21 contributes to neuroendocrine control of female reproduction. Nat Med 19: 1153–1156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owen BM, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA (2015) Tissue‐specific actions of the metabolic hormones FGF15/19 and FGF21. Trends Endocrinol Metab 26: 22–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan W, Myers MG Jr (2016) A new role for glia in leptin action and energy balance. Cell Metab 23: 969–970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkash J, Messina A, Langlet F, Cimino I, Loyens A, Mazur D, Gallet S, Balland E, Malone SA, Pralong F et al (2015) Semaphorin7A regulates neuroglial plasticity in the adult hypothalamic median eminence. Nat Commun 6: 6385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitteloud N, Hayes FJ, Dwyer A, Boepple PA, Lee H, Crowley WF Jr (2002) Predictors of outcome of long‐term GnRH therapy in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 4128–4136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitteloud N, Mootha VK, Dwyer AA, Hardin M, Lee H, Eriksson KF, Tripathy D, Yialamas M, Groop L, Elahi D et al (2005) Relationship between testosterone levels, insulin sensitivity, and mitochondrial function in men. Diabetes Care 28: 1636–1642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitteloud N, Acierno JS Jr, Meysing A, Eliseenkova AV, Ma J, Ibrahimi OA, Metzger DL, Hayes FJ, Dwyer AA, Hughes VA et al (2006) Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 cause both Kallmann syndrome and normosmic idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6281–6286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitteloud N, Quinton R, Pearce S, Raivio T, Acierno J, Dwyer A, Plummer L, Hughes V, Seminara S, Cheng YZ et al (2007) Digenic mutations account for variable phenotypes in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Investig 117: 457–463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polanska UM, Edwards E, Fernig DG, Kinnunen TK (2011) The cooperation of FGF receptor and Klotho is involved in excretory canal development and regulation of metabolic homeostasis in Caenorhabditis elegans . J Biol Chem 286: 5657–5666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poliandri A, Miller D, Howard S, Nobles M, Ruiz‐Babot G, Harmer S, Tinker A, McKay T, Guasti L, Dunkel L (2017) Generation of kisspeptin‐responsive GnRH neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 447: 12–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prevot V, Croix D, Rialas CM, Poulain P, Fricchione GL, Stefano GB, Beauvillain JC (1999) Estradiol coupling to endothelial nitric oxide stimulates gonadotropin‐releasing hormone release from rat median eminence via a membrane receptor. Endocrinology 140: 652–659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prevot V, Hanchate NK, Bellefontaine N, Sharif A, Parkash J, Estrella C, Allet C, de Seranno S, Campagne C, de Tassigny X et al (2010) Function‐related structural plasticity of the GnRH system: a role for neuronal‐glial‐endothelial interactions. Front Neuroendocrinol 31: 241–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quaynor SD, Kim HG, Cappello EM, Williams T, Chorich LP, Bick DP, Sherins RJ, Layman LC (2011) The prevalence of digenic mutations in patients with normosmic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and Kallmann syndrome. Fertil Steril 96:1424–1430.e1426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quaynor SD, Ko EK, Chorich LP, Sullivan ME, Demir D, Waller JL, Kim HG, Cameron RS, Layman LC (2015) NELF knockout is associated with impaired pubertal development and subfertility. Mol Cell Endocrinol 407: 26–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quennell JH, Mulligan AC, Tups A, Liu X, Phipps SJ, Kemp CJ, Herbison AE, Grattan DR, Anderson GM (2009) Leptin indirectly regulates gonadotropin‐releasing hormone neuronal function. Endocrinology 150: 2805–2812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raivio T, Falardeau J, Dwyer A, Quinton R, Hayes FJ, Hughes VA, Cole LW, Pearce SH, Lee H, Boepple P et al (2007) Reversal of idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. N Engl J Med 357: 863–873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raivio T, Sidis Y, Plummer L, Chen H, Ma J, Mukherjee A, Jacobson‐Dickman E, Quinton R, Van Vliet G, Lavoie H et al (2009) Impaired fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 signaling as a cause of normosmic idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94: 4380–4390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D, Haussler D (1997) Improved splice site detection in Genie. J Comput Biol 4: 311–323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier‐Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17: 405–424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Somm E, Henrichot E, Pernin A, Juge‐Aubry CE, Muzzin P, Dayer JM, Nicklin MJ, Meier CA (2005) Decreased fat mass in interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist‐deficient mice: impact on adipogenesis, food intake, and energy expenditure. Diabetes 54: 3503–3509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Somm E, Guerardel A, Maouche K, Toulotte A, Veyrat‐Durebex C, Rohner‐Jeanrenaud F, Maskos U, Huppi PS, Schwitzgebel VM (2014) Concomitant alpha7 and beta2 nicotinic AChR subunit deficiency leads to impaired energy homeostasis and increased physical activity in mice. Mol Genet Metab 112: 64–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamou MI, Cox KH, Crowley WF Jr (2016) Discovering genes essential to the hypothalamic regulation of human reproduction using a human disease model: adjusting to life in the “‐Omics” Era. Endocr Rev 2016: 4–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Steyn FJ, Wan Y, Clarkson J, Veldhuis JD, Herbison AE, Chen C (2013) Development of a methodology for and assessment of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in juvenile and adult male mice. Endocrinology 154: 4939–4945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun HD, Malabunga M, Tonra JR, DiRenzo R, Carrick FE, Zheng H, Berthoud HR, McGuinness OP, Shen J, Bohlen P et al (2007) Monoclonal antibody antagonists of hypothalamic FGFR1 cause potent but reversible hypophagia and weight loss in rodents and monkeys. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292: E964–E976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sykiotis GP, Plummer L, Hughes VA, Au M, Durrani S, Nayak‐Young S, Dwyer AA, Quinton R, Hall JE, Gusella JF et al (2010) Oligogenic basis of isolated gonadotropin‐releasing hormone deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 15140–15144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tam CS, Xie W, Johnson WD, Cefalu WT, Redman LM, Ravussin E (2012) Defining insulin resistance from hyperinsulinemic‐euglycemic clamps. Diabetes Care 35: 1605–1610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tripathy D, Shah P, Lakshmy R, Reddy KS (1998) Effect of testosterone replacement on whole body glucose utilisation and other cardiovascular risk factors in males with idiopathic hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Horm Metab Res 30: 642–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsai PS, Moenter SM, Postigo HR, El Majdoubi M, Pak TR, Gill JC, Paruthiyil S, Werner S, Weiner RI (2005) Targeted expression of a dominant‐negative fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor in gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons reduces FGF responsiveness and the size of GnRH neuronal population. Mol Endocrinol 19: 225–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Villanueva C, Jacobson‐Dickman E, Xu C, Manouvrier S, Dwyer AA, Sykiotis GP, Beenken A, Liu Y, Tommiska J, Hu Y et al (2015) Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with split hand/foot malformation: a clinical entity with a high frequency of FGFR1 mutations. Genet Med 17: 651–659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang JJ, Caligioni CS, Chan YM, Seminara SB (2012) Uncovering novel reproductive defects in neurokinin B receptor null mice: closing the gap between mice and men. Endocrinology 153: 1498–1508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yialamas MA, Dwyer AA, Hanley E, Lee H, Pitteloud N, Hayes FJ (2007) Acute sex steroid withdrawal reduces insulin sensitivity in healthy men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92: 4254–4259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zitzmann M (2009) Testosterone deficiency, insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol 5: 673–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.