ABSTRACT
Escherichia coli KRX is a strain offering both a high transformation efficiency and the possibility to produce the target protein to high yields in one host, avoiding additional cloning steps. Here, the draft genome sequence of E. coli KRX is presented and provides the genetic basis for additional biotechnological applications.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Escherichia coli KRX is a commercially available derivate of E. coli K-12, created by Promega (catalog no. L3002 [Madison, WI, USA]). It combines characteristics that make it a suitable host for efficient plasmid transformation and propagation, as well as high-yield protein production with tight regulation. KRX is widely used for protein expression and protein evolution experiments, e.g., for cytochrome P450, peptide synthases, laccases, and Argonaute proteins (1–4), in certain cases showing markedly higher yields than other E. coli strains (5).
KRX enables high transformation efficiencies via the popular recA1, endA1, hsdr17, and e14− gene alleles, preventing the degradation of plasmid DNA and unwanted recombination events (6).
Using the T7 RNA polymerase under control of the rhamnose-inducible promoter (rhaPBAD), high protein yields can be achieved. rhaPBAD is activated by rhamnose and subjected to catabolite repression by glucose, enabling the use of autoinduction media. In E. coli KRX, the genes involved in the rhamnose metabolism have been deleted, ensuring a long induction phase.
While the genome of E. coli K-12 MG1655 is already publicly available (7), the genome of E. coli KRX shows some concise differences. Therefore, in this study, the draft genome sequence of E. coli KRX was established on the Illumina MiSeq system. A paired-end MiSeq sequencing run (2 × 300 bases) yielded 757,408 reads, accounting for 227.22 Mb of total sequence information. Assembly of all sequence reads applying the GS De Novo Assembler software (version 2.8) and reference mapping using r2cat (8) resulted in the draft sequences of the chromosome and the F plasmid of E. coli KRX, comprising 68 scaffolds and 110 contigs. Annotation of the chromosome was accomplished within the GenDB platform (9). The total size for the chromosome was determined to be 4,531,656 bp, featuring a G+C content of 50.78%. Gene prediction revealed 4,232 coding sequences (CDSs), 79 tRNA genes, and 5 rRNA genes. The F plasmid draft sequence has a size of 94,304 bp, features a G+C content of 48.01%, and contains 97 predicted protein-coding genes.
Analysis and interpretation of the E. coli KRX genome sequence within GenDB resulted in the identification of most described changes in comparison to E. coli K-12 MG1655. In contrast to the published genotype ([F′ traD36 ΔompP proA+ B+ lacIq Δ(lacZ)M15] ΔompT endA1 recA1 gyrA96 (nalr) thi-1 hsdR17 (rK− mK+) e14− (mcrA–) relA1 supE44 Δ(lac-proAB) Δ(rhaBAD)::T7 RNA polymerase), no mutations in the hsdR and relA genes were detected. Interestingly, E. coli DH1 (GenBank accession no. CP001637), a strain that should harbor the same hsdR17 and relA1 alleles as KRX, also displays the native forms of these genes. This indicates that in a step leading to the creation of E. coli DH1 and E. coli KRX, these mutations were lost or incorrectly attributed. E. coli KRX contains a different mutation (Leu232Pro) instead of the one described in the literature for the recA1 allele (Gly160Asp) (6). The genes proA and proB were located on the chromosome rather than on the F plasmid, potentially as a result of a reinsertion of these genes via homologous recombination.
Accession number(s).
The E. coli KRX draft genome sequence was deposited in the EMBL database under the accession numbers CYPX01000001 to CYPX01000103.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by grants from the Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia for the CLIB-Graduate Cluster Industrial Biotechnology and from Bielefeld University. The bioinformatics support of the BMBF-funded project “Bielefeld-Gießen Center for Microbial Bioinformatics–BiGi” (grant 031A533) within the German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (de.NBI) is gratefully acknowledged. We acknowledge support for the article processing charge by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
Footnotes
Citation Schwarzhans J-P, Wibberg D, Winkler A, Kalinowski J, Friehs K. 2017. Complete draft genome sequence of Escherichia coli KRX, a strain for efficient cloning and high-yield expression of proteins under control of the T7 RNA polymerase. Genome Announc 5:e00933-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00933-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brissos V, Pereira L, Munteanu FD, Cavaco-Paulo A, Martins LO. 2009. Expression system of CotA-laccase for directed evolution and high-throughput screenings for the oxidation of high-redox potential dyes. Biotechnol J 4:558–563. doi: 10.1002/biot.200800248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haslinger K, Maximowitsch E, Brieke C, Koch A, Cryle MJ. 2014. Cytochrome P450 OxyBtei catalyzes the first phenolic coupling step in teicoplanin biosynthesis. Chembiochem 15:2719–2728. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kalb D, Heinekamp T, Lackner G, Scharf DH, Dahse HM, Brakhage AA, Hoffmeister D. 2015. Genetic engineering activates biosynthesis of aromatic fumaric acid amides in the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1594–1600. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03268-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Swarts DC, Jore MM, Westra ER, Zhu Y, Janssen JH, Snijders AP, Wang Y, Patel DJ, Berenguer J, Brouns SJJ, van der Oost J. 2014. DNA-guided DNA interference by a prokaryotic Argonaute. Nature 507:258–261. doi: 10.1038/nature12971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brissos V, Gonçalves N, Melo EP, Martins LO. 2014. Improving kinetic or thermodynamic stability of an azoreductase by directed evolution. PLoS One 9:e87209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Durfee T, Nelson R, Baldwin S, Plunkett G III, Burland V, Mau B, Petrosino JF, Qin X, Muzny DM, Ayele M, Gibbs RA, Csörgo B, Pósfai G, Weinstock GM, Blattner FR. 2008. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli DH10B: insights into the biology of a laboratory workhorse. J Bacteriol 190:2597–2606. doi: 10.1128/JB.01695-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blattner FR, Plunkett G III, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Husemann P, Stoye J. 2010. r2cat: synteny plots and comparative assembly. Bioinformatics 26:570–571. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC, Bartels D, Bekel T, Clausen J, Kalinowski J, Linke B, Rupp O, Giegerich R, Pühler A. 2003. GenDB—an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31:2187–2195. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
