ABSTRACT
Here, we present the draft genome sequences of the Coxiella burnetii Dugway 7D77-80 and Dugway 7E65-68 strains, which were isolated from rodents in Dugway, UT, in the 1950s. The strains reside in a distinct genomic group of C. burnetii and are considered avirulent despite having the largest genomes of the Coxiella genus.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Coxiella burnetii, the bacterial cause of human Q fever, has an impressive range of animal hosts, with the majority of human infections acquired by inhalation of contaminated aerosols generated by infected domestic livestock (1). C. burnetii strains display a range of virulence in rodent models of infection (2, 3). There are also correlations between genetic content and disease outcome in humans (4, 5). Five strains (5J108-111, 7D77-80, 7E9-12, 7E22-57, and 7E65-68) were isolated in 1957 in Dugway, UT, from either a deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) or a kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii or Dipodomys microps) (2, 6). All were initially shown to be avirulent for guinea pigs via an intraperitoneal route of infection (2). More recently, it was demonstrated that the Dugway 5J108-111 strain is avirulent for guinea pigs via the aerosol route and that infection of CB-17 mice induces low levels of proinflammatory cytokines compared with those induced by infections by genomic group I strains, such as African (RSA334), a human acute disease isolate (3). The Dugway strains constitute a unique genomic group (group VI) (7–9). Genomic sequencing of Dugway 5J108-111 revealed the largest C. burnetii chromosome (2,158 kbp) and plasmid (54.2 kbp), which together contain 2,052 genes (excluding pseudogenes). This is 203 more genes than found in the highly virulent Nine Mile (RSA493) reference strain (8). Phylogenetically, the Dugway strains appear to represent a more primitive genomic group that has not undergone the genome reduction associated with pathogenic C. burnetii strains (8, 10). Dugway-like strains have not been isolated from human Q fever patients nor pathological animal infections, such as those causing abortions in sheep or goats (1, 10). Thus, it is interesting to speculate that the novel gene content of the Dugway isolates enables persistent subclinical infection of animal hosts with perhaps a specific tropism for rodents (10, 11). The purpose of this study was to expand our knowledge of the genome content of C. burnetii Dugway strains.
Strains were grown in acidified citrate cysteine medium-2 (ACCM-2) (12), and DNA was isolated using a Mo Bio PowerMicrobial DNA extraction kit. DNA was sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq instrument to generate 2 × 300-bp read pairs. Raw FASTQ reads for each sample were quality trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.3 (13). Quality-trimmed reads were then assembled into contiguous sequences (contigs) using SPAdes genome assembler version 3.9.1, with the -careful flag and k-mer lengths of 21, 33, 55, 77, 99, and 127. Contigs with coverage of less than 2 and shorter than 200 bp were discarded. The draft genomes were submitted to GenBank for annotation using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation pipeline (PGAP). The assembly properties and annotation statistics for each genome are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1 .
Strain | No. of contigs | Genome coverage (×) | Plasmid coverage (×) | GenBank accession no. | Chromosome size (bp) | Total no. of chromosome genesa | Plasmid size (bp) | Total no. of plasmid genes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dugway 7D77-80 | 33 | 75 | 168 | NOLN00000000 | 2,138,428 | 2,286 | 53,590 | 67 |
Dugway 7E65-68 | 35 | 114 | 185 | NOLM00000000 | 2,138,988 | 2,280 | 53,586 | 67 |
Total gene count includes coding genes, RNAs (tRNA, noncoding RNA [ncRNA], and rRNA), and pseudogenes.
Accession number(s).
The annotated draft whole-genome sequences of the chromosome and QpDG plasmid of Coxiella burnetii Dugway 7D77-80 and 7E65-68 strains have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers shown in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Footnotes
Citation Beare PA, Jeffrey BM, Martens CA, Heinzen RA. 2017. Draft genome sequences of the avirulent Coxiella burnetii Dugway 7D77-80 and Dugway 7E65-68 strains isolated from rodents in Dugway, Utah. Genome Announc 5:e00984-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00984-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Arricau-Bouvery N, Rodolakis A. 2005. Is Q fever an emerging or re-emerging zoonosis? Vet Res 36:327–349. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stoenner HG, Lackman DB. 1960. The biologic properties of Coxiella burnetii isolated from rodents collected in Utah. Am J Hyg 71:45–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Russell-Lodrigue KE, Andoh M, Poels MWJ, Shive HR, Weeks BR, Zhang GQ, Tersteeg C, Masegi T, Hotta A, Yamaguchi T, Fukushi H, Hirai K, McMurray DN, Samuel JE. 2009. Coxiella burnetii isolates cause genogroup-specific virulence in mouse and guinea pig models of acute Q fever. Infect Immun 77:5640–5650. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00851-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Glazunova O, Roux V, Freylikman O, Sekeyova Z, Fournous G, Tyczka J, Tokarevich N, Kovacava E, Marrie TJ, Raoult D. 2005. Coxiella burnetii genotyping. Emerg Infect Dis 11:1211–1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Angelakis E, Million M, D’Amato F, Rouli L, Richet H, Stein A, Rolain JM, Raoult D. 2013. Q fever and pregnancy: disease, prevention, and strain specificity. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:361–368. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1750-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stoenner HG, Holdenried R, Lackman D, Orsborn JS Jr. 1959. The occurrence of Coxiella burnetii, Brucella, and other pathogens among fauna of the Great Salt Lake Desert in Utah. Am J Trop Med Hyg 8:590–596. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1959.8.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hendrix LR, Samuel JE, Mallavia LP. 1991. Differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates by analysis of restriction-endonuclease-digested DNA separated by SDS-PAGE. J Gen Microbiol 137:269–276. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-2-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beare PA, Unsworth N, Andoh M, Voth DE, Omsland A, Gilk SD, Williams KP, Sobral BW, Kupko JJ III, Porcella SF, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA. 2009. Comparative genomics reveal extensive transposon-mediated genomic plasticity and diversity among potential effector proteins within the genus Coxiella. Infect Immun 77:642–656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01141-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hornstra HM, Priestley RA, Georgia SM, Kachur S, Birdsell DN, Hilsabeck R, Gates LT, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA, Kersh GJ, Keim P, Massung RF, Pearson T. 2011. Rapid typing of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS One 6:e26201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pearson T, Hornstra HM, Sahl JW, Schaack S, Schupp JM, Beckstrom-Sternberg SM, O’Neill MW, Priestley RA, Champion MD, Beckstrom-Sternberg JS, Kersh GJ, Samuel JE, Massung RF, Keim P. 2013. When outgroups fail; phylogenomics of rooting the emerging pathogen, Coxiella burnetii. Syst Biol 62:752–762. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bliven KA, Maurelli AT. 2012. Antivirulence genes: insights into pathogen evolution through gene loss. Infect Immun 80:4061–4070. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00740-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Omsland A, Beare PA, Hill J, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Hansen B, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA. 2011. Isolation from animal tissue and genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii are facilitated by an improved axenic growth medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3720–3725. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02826-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]