Abstract
The sulfation at the 3-OH position of glucosamine is an important modification in forming structural domains for heparan sulfate to enable its biological functions. Seven 3-O-sulfotransferase isoforms in the human genome are involved in the biosynthesis of 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate. As a rare modification present in heparan sulfate, the availability of 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharides is very limited. Here, we report the use of a chemoenzymatic synthetic approach to synthesize six 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharides, including three hexasaccharides and three octasaccharides. The synthesis was achieved by rearranging the enzymatic modification sequence to accommodate the substrate specificity of 3-O-sulfotransferase 3. We studied the impact of 3-O-sulfation on the conformation of the pyranose ring of 2-O-sulfated iduronic acid using NMR, and on the correlation between ring conformation and anticoagulant activity. We identified a novel octasaccharide that interacts with antithrombin and displays anti factor Xa activity. Interestingly, the octasaccharide displays a faster clearance rate than fondaparinux, an FDA approved pentasaccharide drug, in a rat model, making this octasaccharide a potential short acting anticoagulant drug candidate that could reduce bleeding risk. Having access to a set of critically important 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharides offers the potential to develop new heparan sulfate-based therapeutics.
TOC image

Introduction
Heparan sulfate (HS) is a polysaccharide comprising disaccharide repeating units of a glucuronic acid (GlcA) or iduronic acid (IdoA) residue linked to a glucosamine (GlcN) residue, with each capable of being modified by sulfation. HS exhibits important physiological and pathological functions, including regulating embryonic development, inflammatory responses, blood coagulation and viral/bacterial infections1–3. Most notably, heparin, a highly sulfated form of HS, is a widely used anticoagulant drug in clinics for the treatment of patients with thrombotic disorders 4
The functional selectivity of HS and heparin is governed by the sulfation types and the location of GlcA and IdoA residues 5 Sulfation is found at the 2-OH of IdoA (and to a lesser extent, GlcA) and the N-, 3-OH and 6-OH positions of GlcN residues. Moreover, the conformation of the IdoA and IdoA2S residues adopt both chair (1C4) and skew boat (2SO) conformations 6. The conformations of GlcA, GlcA2S and GlcN residues exist in the chair (4C1) conformation 7–8. The conformational flexibility of IdoA2S residues is known to be essential for binding to antithrombin to display anticoagulant activity 9 and fibroblast growth factors to regulate cell growth 10.
The synthesis of HS oligosaccharides remains a challenge. A number of oligosaccharides are synthesized via a purely organic synthetic approach 11–15, but it is still very difficult to synthesize oligosaccharides larger than hexasaccharides with complex sulfation patterns. As an alternative approach, a chemoenzymatic method to synthesize HS oligosaccharides has emerged, using HS biosynthetic enzymes involving glycosyltransferases, C5-epimerase, and sulfotransferases 16–17. The method offers high-efficiency synthesis for a wide range of oligosaccharides; however, the synthesis of certain oligosaccharide sequences is not yet possible due to a lack of understanding of the substrate specificities of HS biosynthetic enzymes.
The 3-O-sulfation occurs infrequently in HS, but this sulfation type is intimately linked to its biological functions 18. The 3-O-sulfation is critically important for anticoagulant activity 19, facilitates the entry of herpes simplex virus into host cells to establish infection 20, regulates axon guidance and growth of neurons 18 and controls the progenitor cell expansion for salivary gland development 3. Effects in model organisms were also reported, including neurogenesis in Drosophila 21, neurite branching in C. elegans 22 and cardiac contraction in zebra fish 23. Precisely how the 3-O-sulfated glucosamine (GlcNS3S±6S) residues play critical roles in contributing to the biological activity of HS is currently unknown. The GlcNS3S±6S residue is known to be surrounded by other monosaccharide residues to form a unique sulfated saccharide sequence domain, enabling HS to exert its biological effects. For example, the GlcNS3S±6S residue existing in a pentasaccharide domain enables HS to bind to antithrombin (AT) 24. An octasaccharide carrying the GlcNS3S±6S residue interacts with herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D 25. Seven isoforms of 3-OST are present in the human genome that may potentially be used to prepare different 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharides 26.
Results
Chemoenzymatic synthesis of oligosaccharides carrying GlcNS3S and GlcNS3S6S residues
The synthesis of hexasaccharides (compound 1 to 3, Fig 1A) and octasaccharides (compound 4 to 6, Fig 1A) was accomplished in the current study. Two 3-O-sulfotransferase (3-OST) isoforms, 3-OST-1 and 3-OST-3, were employed to install the GlcNS3S±6S residue into different saccharide sequences. The 3-OST-1 enzyme introduces a sulfation to form a GlcNS3S6S residue that is linked to a GlcA residue at the nonreducing end, forming the disaccharide unit of -GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-; whereas the 3-OST-3 enzyme introduces a sulfation to form a GlcNS3S residue that is linked to an IdoA2S residue at the nonreducing end, forming the disaccharide unit of – IdoA2S-GlcNS3S-. Although 3-OST-1 has been successfully used to synthesize oligosaccharides in numerous studies 16–17, 27–28, the use of 3-OST-3 to synthesize oligosaccharides consisting of the -IdoA2S-GlcNS3S- disaccharide units has not been reported.
Fig 1. Structures and synthetic schemes for different HS oligosaccharides.

Panel A shows the structures of 11 oligosaccharides used in this study. The synthesis of Compound 1 to 6 was accomplished for the first time. Subsequently, these compounds were subjected to purity and structural analysis as described in the text. The synthesis of Compound 7* to 11* was reported in previous publications 17, 45. Panel B shows the schemes for the syntheses of compound 1 to 6. Both starting materials, NS2S 6-mer substrate and NS2S 8-mer substrate, were synthesized in a previous publication 17. 6-OSTs represent 6-O-sulfotransferase isoform 1 and isoform 3. Panel C depicts the structures of three conformers of an IdoA2S residue.
Here, we discovered that 3-OST-3 and 3-OST-1 have different substrate requirements. The 3-OST-1 enzyme sulfates oligosaccharide substrates that carry 6-O-sulfation, while displaying very low reactivity towards the oligosaccharide substrates that lack 6-O-sulfation (Supplementary Fig S1), which is consistent with the conclusions described previously 16. In contrast, 3-OST-3 preferentially sulfates oligosaccharides that do not carry 6-O-sulfation (Supplementary Fig S1), but the reactivity of those 6-O-sulfated oligosaccharide substrates to 3-OST-3 modification was low (Supplementary Fig S1). Results from kinetic analysis demonstrate that 3-OST-3 has higher catalytic efficiency for oligosaccharide substrates without 6-O-sulfation as determined by the values of kcat/Km (Supplementary Fig S2).
The discovery of distinct substrate requirements for 3-OST-1 and 3-OST-3 led us devise two separate schemes to synthesize oligosaccharides that contain different 3-O-sulfated saccharide sequences. For the synthesis of oligosaccharides containing the IdoA2S-GlcNS3S±6S disaccharide unit (compound 1, 2, 4 and 5), 3-O-sulfation by 3-OST-3 was introduced prior to the 6-O-sulfation step (Fig 1B), whereas for the synthesis of oligosaccharides containing the GlcA-GlcNS3S6S disaccharide unit, the 3-O-sulfation by 3-OST-1 was performed after the 6-O-sulfation step (Fig 1B) (compound 3 and 6). The AT-binding domain consists of a pentasaccharide unit of –GlcNS(or Ac)6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S±6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-, of which the 3-O-sulfation on the central glucosamine residue of this pentasaccharide domain is critical for high binding affinity 24, 29 (Supplementary Fig S3). Among all the oligosaccharides tested in this study, only compounds 8* and 11* contain the pentasaccharide unit (Supplementary Fig S3).
Structural and conformational analysis of oligosaccharides
The purity and structural analysis of compounds 1 to 6 was conducted; representative data for the analysis of compound 6 is shown in Fig 2. Compound 6 was eluted as a single peak from high resolution anion exchange HPLC, suggesting that the compound is pure (Fig 2B). The molecular mass of compound 6 was determined to be 2449.43 ± 0.74 by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), which is very close to the calculated molecular mass of 2448.92 (Fig 2C). The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 6 clearly shows eight anomeric protons, confirming that the product is an octasaccharide (Supplementary Fig S24). The 13C-NMR and full NMR assignment for compound 6 are shown in Supplementary Fig S25 and Supplementary Table S1 respectively. The additional structural characterization including full NMR assignments for compound 1 to 5 are shown in Supplementary Figs S4 to S26 and Supplementary Table S1. To locate the 3-O-sulfo group in compound 4, tandem MS analysis was carried out. In this analysis, a stable isotopically labeled [34S]sulfo group was introduced by the 3-OST-3 enzyme, allowing us to unambiguously identify the presence of the 3-O-sulfo group at residue d in compound 4 (Supplementary Fig S27). Given the fact that 3-OST-3 prefers sulfating the GlcNS residue that resides internally (residue d) over the one that is close to the reducing end (residue b) of the octasaccharide substrate, the enzyme possibly preferentially modifies the GlcNS residues in the middle of HS polysaccharide chains during the biosynthesis. As compound 4 was the intermediate for compound 5 and 6, the tandem MS analysis of compound 4 also helped to locate the IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S disaccharide unit in compound 5 and 6.
Fig 2. Purity and structural analysis compound 6.

Panel A shows the structure of the compound 6. Panel B shows the chromatogram of DEAE-HPLC analysis. Panel C shows the ESI-MS spectrum of compound 6. The molecular ions carrying 5, 6, and 7 negative charges are indicated.
The pyranose rings of IdoA2S residues interconvert between different conformations, including chair forms (1C4 and 4C1) and the skew boat form (2SO) (Fig 1C). Previously, we demonstrated that 2-O-sulfation, 6-O-sulfation and 3-O-sulfation (made by 3-OST-1 enzyme) pushes the equilibrium for IdoA2S residues towards the 2SO conformer, while these sulfations drive the equilibrium for IdoA residues towards the 1C4 conformer 30. In the present study, the impact of 3-O-sulfation on the conformation of neighboring IdoA2S residues was investigated. The conformational analysis was completed by NMR through measuring the three bond proton proton coupling constants (3JH-H) 30. The 3-O-sulfation increases the population of 2SO conformer of the IdoA2S residue in hexasaccharides (compound 1 to 3, Table 1 and Fig 1A), compared to that of the IdoA2S residue in a hexasaccharide without the GlcNS3S6S residue (compound 7*). In compound 3, the IdoA2S residue almost exclusively displays the 2SO conformation. For octasaccharides (compound 4 to 6, Table 1 and Fig 1A), two IdoA2S residues exist, designated as residue c and e. The effect of 3-O-sulfation on the 2SO population varies. For example, 3-O-sulfation increases the 2SO population for both flanked IdoA2S residues as displayed in compound 5, compared with those of IdoA2S residues in an octasaccharide without the GlcNS3S6S residue (compound 10*). In compound 11*, the 3-O-sulfation on residue f increases 2SO population of the adjacent IdoA2S residue (residue e), but has no effect on a distant IdoA2S residue (residue c), compared with corresponding residues in compound 10*. In compound 6, 3-O-sulfation on residue d and f increases the 2SO population of residue e, but decreases 2SO population of residue c to 58% from 71% (Table 1), compared with the corresponding residues from compound 5. Our observations raise the possibility that 3-O-sulfation could regulate the structure of HS through its effect on the conformation of IdoA2S residues. It has been reported that the IdoA2S residue adjusts its conformation as HS interacts with proteins because of the structural flexibility 31.
Table 1.
Effects of the GlcNS3S6S or GlcNS3S residue on the population of conformers for IdoA2S in oligosaccharides
| Compounds: Abbreviated oligosaccharide structures | Site of IdoA2S residue |
Measured 3JH-H couplings (Hz) (Calculated 3JH-H couplings) |
Population of conformersb | Sum of square differencec |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3JH1-H2 | 3JH2-H3 | 3JH3-H4 | 3JH4-H5 | 1C4 | 2SO | 4C1 | ||||
| Hexasaccharides | Comp 7*: GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-pNPd | c | 2.2 (2.7)a | 4.3 (4.1) | 3.2 (3.0) | 2.3 (2.2) | 68 % | 32 % | – | 0.34 |
| Comp 1: GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S-GlcA-pNPe | c | 2.6 (3.1) | 5.0 (4.7) | 3.3 (3.3) | 2.5 (2.3) | 58 % | 42 % | – | 0.38 | |
| Comp 2: GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-GlcA-pNP | c | 4.1 (4.8) | 7.8 (7.3) | 3.9 (4.3) | 3.2 (2.9) | 19 % | 81 % | – | 0.99 | |
| Comp 3: GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-GlcA-pNP | c | 4.8(5.5) | 9.0 (8.4) | 4.3 (4.8) | 3.5 (3.1) | – (1 %) | 99 % | – | 1.26 | |
| Octasaccharides | Comp 9*: GlcNAc-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-pNP |
c e |
2.5 (3.0) 2.1 (2.5) |
4.7 (4.6) 4.0 (3.7) |
3.5 (3.3) 3.3 (3.0) |
2.5 (2.3) 2.3 (2.1) |
62 % 72 % |
37 % 24 % |
– (2 %) – (3 %) |
0.34 0.38 |
| Comp 4: GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-pNP |
c e |
2.8(3.3) 2.2(2.7) |
5.3 (5.1) 4.4 (4.2) |
3.5 (3.4) 3.3 (3.1) |
2.7 (2.4) 2.5 (2.2) |
53 % 67 % |
47 % 33 % |
– – |
0.39 0.42 |
|
| Comp 10*: GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP |
c e |
3.1 (3.8) 3.2 (3.8) |
6.1 (5.8) 6.1 (5.8) |
3.8(3.7) 3.8(3.7) |
2.8 (2.5) 2.9 (2.5) |
42 % 41 % |
58 % 59 % |
– – |
0.68 0.62 |
|
| Comp 5: GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP |
c e |
3.6 (4.3) 3.9 (4.5) |
7.0(6.6) 7.3 (6.9) |
4.0(4.1) 4.0(4.2) |
3.1 (2.7) 3.0 (2.8) |
29 % 25 % |
71 % 75 % |
– – |
0.82 0.60 |
|
| Comp 6: GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP |
c e |
3.0 (3.8) 4.1 (4.8) |
6.1 (5.8) 7.8 (7.3) |
3.9 (3.7) 3.9 (4.3) |
2.9 (2.5) 3.2 (2.9) |
42 % 19 % |
58 % 81 % |
– – |
0.93 0.99 |
|
| Comp 11*: GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP |
c e |
3.1 (3.7) 3.6 (4.4) |
6.1 (5.7) 7.2 (6.7) |
3.7 (3.7) 4.1 (4.1) |
2.8 (2.5) 3.1 (2.7) |
43 % 27 % |
57 % 73 % |
– – |
0.61 1.05 |
|
The calculated values (presented in parentheses) were obtained using Amber 14 with GLYCAM06 parameters 46.
The conversion of the measured values of coupling constant to population of different conformers was described in a previous publication 30.
The residual sum of squares (RSS) was used to determine how well the calculated population ratios fit the experimental data.
The population of conformation of comp 7* was reported in a paper published previously 30.
The position of 3-O-sulfated glucosamine (GlcNS3S or GlcNS3S6S) is bolded and underlined.
The presence of the -GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S- disaccharide unit is required for anticoagulant activity
HS oligosaccharides achieve their anticoagulant activity by interacting with AT, therefore oligosaccharides displaying anti-FXa activity should bind to AT. The effects of saccharide residues surrounding the GlcNS3S6S residue on AT-binding as well as anti-FXa activity were examined. Our data revealed that the presence of a -GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S- disaccharide unit, i.e. an IdoA2S located at the reducing end of the GlcNS3S6S residue, is critical in determining anticoagulant activity (Table 2). Compounds 2 and 8* have six residues, eight sulfo groups, one IdoA2S and two GlcA residues, but only compound 8* displayed anti-FXa activity (Fig 3A and Table 2). As expected, AT binds to compound 8* tightly with a Kd value of 7 ± 2 nM, but not to compound 2 (Table 2). Structurally, the compounds differ in the location of the IdoA2S residue. In compound 8*, the 3-O-sulfated glucosamine (GlcNS3S6S) residue is flanked by an IdoA2S residue at the reducing end such that it possesses the –GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S- disaccharide unit, whereas the GlcNS3S6S in compound 2 is flanked by a GlcA residue at the reducing end such that it possesses the –GlcNS3S6S-GlcA- disaccharide unit.
Table 2.
Correlation between the disaccharide domain (–GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-) and AT-binding constant (Kd) as well as anti-FXa activity (IC50)
| Abbreviated structures | Binding affinity (Kd) to AT (nM) | Anti-FXa activity (IC50, nM) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fondaparinux, 5-mer | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-OMea | 14.8 ± 1.4 nM | 12.2 nM |
| 6 – mers (hexasaccharides) | |||
| Comp 8*b | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP | 7 ± 2 nMb | 9.1 nM |
| Comp 2 | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-GlcA-pNP | No binding | No inhibition |
| Comp 3 | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-GlcA-pNP | Not measured | 11.0 nM |
| IdoA-containing 6-mer | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNPc | 32.6 ± 5.3 nMd | 29.2 nMd |
| GlcA2S-containing 6-mer | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-GlcA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP4 | No bindingd | Not measured |
| 8 – mers (octasaccharides) | |||
| Comp 4 | GlcNS-GlcA-GlcNS-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S-IdoA2S-GlcNS-GlcA-pNP | No bindingc | No inhibition |
| Comp 5 | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S | 5.1 ± 1.4 nM | 7.7 nM |
| Comp 6 | GlcNS6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP | 5.6 ± 2.6 nM | 10.9 nM |
| Comp 11 * | GlcNAc6S-GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-IdoA2S-GlcNS6S-GlcA-pNP | 8 ± 3 nM1 | 9.4 nM |
Fondaparinux, an FDA-approved anticoagulant, was used as a positive control for anti-FXa activity measurement and the binding to AT. The -GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S- disaccharide units are presented in bold face and underlined.
The binding constants for comp 8* and comp 11* were determined by affinity coelectrophoresis as reported in a previous publication 17.
Comp 4 did not bind to AT nor display anti-FXa activity, due to the fact that it does not contain 6-O-sulfo groups at the GlcNS residues at the nonreducing end 29.
Fig 3. Biochemical and biological evaluation of synthesized oligosaccharides.

Panel A shows the in vitro inhibition curve of the activity of FXa. The data is represented as the mean ± S.D. (n =3). Panel B shows the representative data for the ITC analysis of compound 5. Panel C shows the anti-FXa effects of compound 5, compound 11* and fondaparinux in a rat model. The Xa activity measurements at different time points are presented as mean ± S.D. (n =4). Compared with the control group (treated with saline), statistical analysis was conducted on each experimental group using a two-tailed Student’s t-test, where * represents a p-value of < 0.05. Panel D shows the blood concentrations of compound 5, 11* and fondaparinux at different time points in the animals after injection. The concentrations of compound 5, compound 11* and fondaparinux were obtained based on the anti-Xa activity, which was converted into the concentration of drugs by standard curves as shown in Supplementary Fig S29. The data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n= 2).
Our findings are consistent with the previously published conclusion that the 2SO conformation is essential for anticoagulant activity 9. The IdoA2S residue in compound 8* displays the 2SO conformation; whereas in compound 2, this position is occupied by a GlcA residue that adopts the 4C1 conformation. The X-ray crystal structure and NMR solution structure of the complex of AT and fondaparinux demonstrate that the IdoA2S residue is present in 2SO conformation in the complex 32–33. We reported that an IdoA-containing 6-mer, where the IdoA2S residue was substituted with an IdoA residue displaying 2SO conformation, exhibited anti-FXa activity 30 (Table 2). However, a GlcA2S-containing 6-mer, where the IdoA2S residue was substituted with a GlcA2S residue displaying 4C1 conformation, did not display anti-FXa activity 8 (Table 2). Compound 3 displayed strong anti-FXa activity as the 6-mer consists of two GlcNS3S6S residues (Fig 3A and Table 2), consistent with previously published results for an octasaccharide containing a similar pentasaccharide domain 33. Residues d and c in compound 3 constitute the –GlcNS3S6S-IdoA2S-disaccharide unit.
The GlcA residue in the AT-binding domain is substitutable by an IdoA2S residue
Our studies uncovered a new AT-binding saccharide sequence. The currently known AT-binding sequence comprises a disaccharide –GlcA-GlcNS3S±6S-unit 34 (Supplementary Fig S3). The substitution of the –GlcA-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide unit with the –IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide unit in HS was perceived to abolish AT-binding affinity 35–36. The data from the anti-FXa activity and AT-binding analysis of the 8-mers clearly challenged this assertion. Compound 5, which contains the -IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S- (but not –GlcA-GlcNS3S6S-) disaccharide unit, displays strong anti-FXa activity (Table 2). The AT-binding affinity analysis using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) also demonstrated that compound 5 binds to AT tightly (Fig 3B and Table 2). It is unsurprising to see compound 6 displaying anti-FXa activity and high AT-binding affinity (Table 2) as this 8-mer contains the –GlcA-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide unit.
The anticoagulant activity of compound 5 was further confirmed in an in vivo experiment using a rat model. To this end, compound 5 was administered and its anti-FXa effect was compared to that of fondaparinux and compound 11*, an anticoagulant octasaccharide reported previously 17. The results demonstrated that compound 5 has comparable anti-FXa potency to that of fondaparinux and compound 11* (Fig 3C) within 30 min after the drug was administered. However, the anti-FXa effect from compound 5 diminished after 4 hours, while the anti-FXa effect from fondaparinux and compound 11* persisted after 8 hours (Fig 3C). The drug concentrations in the blood sample were also obtained to determine the clearance rate of each compound in vivo (Fig 3D). In comparison with fondaparinux and compound 11*, compound 5 was cleared faster from the animal in the first 2 hours.
The structural promiscuity for residue d in the AT-binding site (Fig 4A) is supported by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of AT in complex with variously modified HS pentasaccharides. The computational technique was first validated by substituting moieties that are known to be essential for AT-binding within an existing co-crystal structure of AT and fondaparinux 24, 37. Calculations for the free energy of binding confirmed that removal of the 3-O-sulfate on residue c or substitution of residue b with GlcA destabilized the complex, indicated by significantly weakened interaction energy by 29% and 17%, respectively, which was qualitatively consistent with experimental data. In contrast, substitution of GlcA (residue d) with an IdoA2S in 1C4 conformation had no effect on free energy (Fig 4B). Interestingly, substitution with an IdoA2S residue in 2SO conformation modestly enhanced the binding energy by 12% (Fig 4B and Supplementary Fig S27), suggesting the possibility of a more stable AT/pentasaccharide complex if residue d is IdoA2S in 2SO conformation. IdoA2S in both conformations were capable of maintaining a similar position of the carboxyl moiety with respect to the protein as was found for the GlcA residue in the simulation of fondaparinux (Fig 4C). Collectively, the MD data support the conclusion that substitution of residue d with an IdoA2S residue does not diminish the binding affinity to AT (Fig 4C), and explain how Compound 5 acts as an active anticoagulant despite lacking the canonical pentasaccharide sequence for AT.
Fig 4. Molecular Dynamic (MD) analysis of the interaction between AT and fondaparinux.

Panel A shows the structure of AT-binding pentasaccharide. The critical sulfo groups for AT-binding affinity and the IdoA2S residue (residue b) are highlighted in blue. The 2SO conformation at residue b position is required for binding to AT. The structural requirement for residue d is promiscuous. Panel B depicts the interaction energy (ΔΔG) of the five MD simulations of AT complexed with fondaparinux and its derivatives. The graphical representation is expressed as mean ± SD (*p ≤ 0.0001 compared to fondaparinux). Panel C presents an image from three simulations of AT in which residue d of fondaparinux is either GlcA (purple), IdoA2S-1C4 (orange), or IdoA2S-2SO (green). The simulations were aligned on AT (grey), and the carboxyl groups of residue d are depicted at multiple time points during the simulations (10 frames each from the latter 150 ns).
Discussion
Here, we describe schemes using the chemoenzymatic approach to prepare a 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharide library. We demonstrate that 3-OST-3 modification, to synthesize oligosaccharides comprising the -IdoA2S-GlcNS3S- or –IdoA2S-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide unit, must precede the 6-O-sulfation step, whereas 3-OST-1 modification can occur only after 6-O-sulfation in order to generate the –GlcA-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide unit. Our finding is supported by the ternary cocrystal structures of 3-OST-1/heptasaccharide/PAP 38 and 3-OST-3/tetrasaccharide/PAP 39. There were no interactions between 3-OST-3 and the 6-O-sulfo groups from the tetrasaccharide substrate, consistent with our conclusion that oligosaccharide substrates for 3-OST-3 do not require 6-O-sulfation. In contrast, interactions between 3-OST-1 and the 6-O-sulfo groups from the heptasaccharide substrate were observed, suggesting that 6-O-sulfation is required to bind to 3-OST-1. The distinct and unique substrate requirements between 3-OST-1 and 3-OST-3 raise a possibility that 3-O-sulfated HS modified by different isoforms of 3-OST are biosynthesized through different pathways.
It was widely accepted that the 3-OST-1 enzyme is responsible for synthesizing anticoagulant HS, whereas the 3-OST-3 enzyme is not 35–36. The AT-binding sequences isolated so far all consist of the –GlcA-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide repeating unit, which is a product of 3-OST-1 enzyme modification 34, 40. Although Compound 5, which is a product of 3-OST-3 enzyme modification, does not contain the –GlcA-GlcNS3S6S- disaccharide unit, it binds to AT and displays anticoagulant activity. Our findings suggest that 3-OST-3 is capable of synthesizing anticoagulant HS, as long as the HS comprises the structural domain similar to that of compound 5. Interestingly, HS isolated from the liver of 3ost1−/− null mice displayed anticoagulant activity, suggesting that an alternative pathway for the biosynthesis of anticoagulant HS exists 41. The authors suggested that 3-OST-3 contributed to the synthesis of anticoagulant HS in those mice.
The fast clearance of compound 5 offers a potential new short-acting anticoagulant drug candidate with reduced bleeding risk. A short-acting anticoagulant drug, which can be cleared from the circulation quickly before major bleeding effects develop, would be particularly beneficial to those patients with high bleeding risk 42. Although unfractionated heparin is an anticoagulant with a short half-life, the concern is that the drug causes heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a life-threatening side effect 43. It has been found that short oligosaccharides smaller than 12-mers 44 do not bind to platelet factor 4, and thus display no risk of causing HIT. As an octasaccharide, compound 5 is hence expected to have very low risk of causing HIT.
The availability of 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharides also opens the opportunity to investigate the casual relationship between saccharide sulfation/conformation and biological functions, a major step forward in dissecting the structure and function relationship of HS. HS 3-OST exists in seven different isoforms. In the present study, we demonstrate that different chemoenzymatic schemes are required for 3-OST-1 and 3-OST-3 to prepare different 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharide sequences. The conclusion from this study will guide others to develop the chemoenzymatic method using different 3-OST isoforms, allowing the preparation of more complex HS saccharides with more extensive sulfation patterns involving 3-O-sulfated glucosamine residues. These studies will enrich the HS oligosaccharide library to assist HS-related research.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Drs. Katy Garrett and Susan Woody (UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy) for assisting with the interpretation of data from the pharmacodynamics studies. This work is supported in part by grants from National Institutes of Health (GM102137, and HL094463) and by a grant from Eshelman Innovation Institute. R.J.W. is supported by the National Institutes of Health grant (P41 GM103390). L.C. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21472115). Z.W. is supported by a grant from China Scholarship Council. E.J.E.C. is a recipient of a scholarship from the Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
Detailed experimental procedures, HPLC chromatograms, MS spectra as well as NMR spectra of synthesized oligosaccharides and additional data figures. This information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at http://pubs.acs.org.
Competing Interest
J.L. and Y.X. are founders of Glycan Therapeutics, LLC. The other authors declare no competing interest.
References
- 1.Xu D, Esko J. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:129–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xu D, Olson J, Cole JN, van Wijk XM, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A, Nizet V, Esko JD, Chang YC. Infect Immun. 2015;83:3648–3656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00545-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Patel VN, Lombaert IMA, Cowherd SN, Shworak N, Xu Y, Liu J, Hoffman MP. Develop Cell. 2014;29:662–673. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu J, Linhardt RJ. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:1676–1685. doi: 10.1039/c4np00076e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kreuger J, Spillmann D, Li J-p, Lindahl U. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:323–327. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sattelle BM, Hansen SU, Gardiner JM, Almond A. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13132–13134. doi: 10.1021/ja1054143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sattelle BM, Almond A. Glycobiology. 2011;21:1651–1662. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hsieh P, Xu Y, Keire DA, Liu J. Glycobiology. 2014;24:681–692. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Das S, Mallet J, J E, Driguez P, Duchaussoy P, Sizun P, Herault J, Herbert J, M P, P S. Chemistry. 2001;7:4821–4834. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20011119)7:22<4821::aid-chem4821>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raman R, Venkataraman G, Ernst S, Sasisekharan R. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100:2357–2362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437842100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hu YP, Lin SY, Huang CY, Zulueta MML, Liu JY, Chang W, Hung SC. Nat Chem. 2011;3:557–563. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arungundram S, Al-Mafraji K, Asong J, Leach FE, III, Amster IJ, Venot A, JE T, Boons GJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17394–17405. doi: 10.1021/ja907358k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schworer R, Zubkova OV, Turnbull JE, Tyler PC. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:6817–6823. doi: 10.1002/chem.201204519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zong C, Huang R, Condac E, Chiu Y, Xiao W, Li ZQ, Lu W, Ishihara M, Wang S, Ramiah A, Stickney M, Azadi P, Amster IJ, Moremen KW, Wang L, Sharp JS, Boons GJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:13059–13067. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hansen SU, Miller GJ, Cole C, Rushton G, Avizienyte E, Jayson GC, Gardiner JM. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2016. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu Y, Masuko S, Takieddin M, Xu H, Liu R, Jing J, Mousa SA, Linhardt RJ, Liu J. Science. 2011;334:498–501. doi: 10.1126/science.1207478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xu Y, Cai C, Chandarajoti K, Hsieh P, Lin Y, Pham TQ, Sparkenbaugh EM, Sheng J, Key NS, Pawlinski RL, Harris EN, Linhardt RJ, Liu J. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:248–250. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thacker BE, Seamen E, Lawrence R, Parker MW, Xu Y, Liu J, Vander KCW, Esko JD. ACS Chem Biol. 2016;11:971–980. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lindahl U, Backstrom G, Thunberg L, Leder IG. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1980;77:6551–6555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shukla D, Liu J, Blaiklock P, Shworak NW, Bai X, Esko JD, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Rosenberg RD, Spear PG. Cell. 1999;99:13–22. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80058-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kamimura K, Rhodes JM, Ueda R, McNeely M, Shukla D, Kimata K, Spear PG, Shworak NW, Nakato H. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:1069–1079. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200403077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tecle E, Diaz-Balzac CA, Bulow HE. G3 (Bethesda) 2013;3:541–542. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.005199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsau C, Ito M, Gromova A, Hoffman MP, Meech R, Makarenkova HP. Development. 2011;138:3307–3317. doi: 10.1242/dev.066241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Petitou M, van Boeckel CAA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:3118–3133. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu J, Shriver Z, Pope RM, Thorp SC, Duncan MB, Copeland RJ, Raska CS, Yoshida K, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen G, Linhardt RJ, Sasisekharan R. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:33456–33467. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202034200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu J, Pedersen LC. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:263–272. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0722-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen J, Avci FY, Muñoz EM, McDowell LM, Chen M, Pedersen LC, Zhang L, Linhardt RJ, Liu J. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:42817–42825. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504338200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Z, McCallum SA, Xie J, Nieto L, Corzana F, Jiménez-Barbero J, Chen M, Liu J, Linhardt RJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12998–13007. doi: 10.1021/ja8026345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Atha DH, Lormeau JC, Petitou M, Rosenberg RD, Choay J. Biochemistry. 1985;24:6723–6729. doi: 10.1021/bi00344a063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hsieh PH, Thieker DF, Guerrini M, Woods RJ, Liu J. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29602. doi: 10.1038/srep29602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nieto L, Canales A, Gimenez-Gallego G, Nieto PM, Jimenez-Barnero J. Chem Eur J. 2011;17:11204–11209. doi: 10.1002/chem.201101000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jin L, Abrahams P, Skinner R, Petitou M, Pike RN, Carrell RW. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94:14683–14688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guerrini M, Elli S, Mourier P, Rudd TR, Gaudesi D, Casu B, Boudier C, Torri G, Viskov C. Biochem J. 2013;449:343–351. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guerrini M, Mourier PA, Torri G, Viskov C. Glycoconj J. 2014;31:409–416. doi: 10.1007/s10719-014-9543-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu J, Shworak NW, Sinaÿ P, Schwartz JJ, Zhang L, Fritze LMS, Rosenberg RD. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:5185–5192. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.5185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xu D, Moon A, Song D, Pedersen LC, Liu J. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:200–202. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Langdown J, Belzar KJ, Savory WJ, Baglin TP, Huntington JA. J Mol Biol. 2009;386:1278–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moon AF, Xu Y, Woody S, Krahn JM, Linhardt RJ, Liu J, Pedersen LC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5256–5270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117923109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moon A, Edavettal SC, Krahn JX, Munoz EM, Negishi M, Linhardt RJ, Liu J, Pedersen LC. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:45185–45193. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405013200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.deAgostini AI, Dong J-C, de Vantery Arrighi C, Ramus M-A, Dentand-Quadri I, Thanlmann S, Ventura P, Ibecheole V, Monge F, Fischer A-M, HajMohammadi S, Shworak N, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Linhardt RJ. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:28115–28124. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805338200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.HajMohammadi S, Enjyoji K, Princivalle M, Christi P, Lech M, Beeler DL, Rayburn H, Schwartz JJ, Barzegar S, de Agostini AI, Post MJ, Rosenberg RD, Shworak NW. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:989–999. doi: 10.1172/JCI15809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mahe I, Chidac J, Helfer H, Nobel S. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:2017–2113. doi: 10.1111/jth.13483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.McGowan KE, Makari J, Diamantouros A, Bucci C, Rempel P, Selby R, Geerts W. Blood. 2016;127:1954–1959. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-660001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kreimann M, Brandt S, Krauel K, Block S, Helm C, Weitschies W, Greinacher A, Delcea M. Blood. 2014;124:2442–2449. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-559518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang J, Hsieh P, Liu X, Zhou W, Zhang X, Zhao J, Xu Y, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ, Liu J. Chem Comm. 2017;53:1743–1746. doi: 10.1039/c6cc08204a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kirschner KN, Yongye AB, Tschampel SM, Gonzalez-Outeirino J, Daniels CR, Foley BL, Woods RJ. J Comput Chem. 2008;29:622–655. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
