Abstract
Although the incidence of ET increases with advancing age, the disease may begin at any age, including childhood. The question arises as to whether childhood-onset ET cases manifest the same sets of pathological changes in the cerebellum as those whose onset is during adult life. We quantified a broad range of postmortem features (Purkinje cell [PC] counts, PC axonal torpedoes, a host of associated axonal changes [PC axonal recurrent collateral count, PC thickened axonal profile count, PC axonal branching count], heterotopic PCs, and basket cell rating) in 60 ET cases (11 childhood-onset and 49 adult-onset) and 30 controls. Compared to controls, childhood-onset ET cases had lower PC counts, higher torpedo counts, higher heterotopic PC counts, higher basket cell plexus rating, and marginally higher PC axonal recurrent collateral counts. The median PC thickened axonal profile count and median PC axonal branching count were two to five times higher in childhood-onset ET than controls, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Childhood-onset and adult-onset ET had similar PC counts, torpedo counts, heterotopic PC counts, basket cell plexus rating, PC axonal recurrent collateral counts, PC thickened axonal profile count and PC axonal branching count. In conclusion, we found that childhood-onset and adult-onset ET shared similar pathological changes in the cerebellum. The data suggest that pathological changes we have observed in the cerebellum in ET are a part of the pathophysiological cascade of events in both forms of the disease and that both groups seem to reach the same pathological endpoints at a similar age of death.
Keywords: essential tremor, cerebellum, neurodegenerative, Purkinje cell, pathology, childhood-onset
Introduction
Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common movement disorders as well as the most common tremor disorder [1; 2]. Despite its high prevalence, disease mechanisms are not completely understood [3; 4]. Clinical [5; 6; 7; 8; 9] and neuroimaging [3; 10; 11; 12] studies suggest that the cerebellum plays an important role in the generation of tremor in ET. Furthermore, in recent years we have observed a constellation of pathological changes in the ET cerebellum, present mainly in the cerebellar cortex and involving the Purkinje cell (PC) and its neighboring neuronal populations, and distinguishing ET from control brains. These changes include an increase in the number of torpedoes and associated PC axonal pathologies [13; 14], an increase in heterotopic PCs [15], and abnormal basket cell axons with a dense and tangled appearance (“hairiness”) surrounding the PC soma and elongated processes extending past the PC axon initial segment [16; 17]. In addition to these changes we have reported PC loss [13; 18], a finding that has been variably reproduced [19; 20; 21]. These pathological changes support the concept that the cerebellum is of mechanistic importance in ET [4; 22; 23]. They also support the concept that ET may be a neurodegenerative disease [4; 22; 23; 24].
Although the incidence of ET increases with advancing age [25], the disease may begin at any age. Indeed, ET cases may arise during childhood [26; 27; 28; 29; 30], with one study reporting that 5.3% of cases began prior to age 20 years [25]. Studies indicate that the familial form of ET is enriched for earlier onset cases, many of which arise during childhood [29; 31; 32].
With the notion that ET could be degenerative [4; 22; 23; 24], the question arises as to whether childhood-onset cases, whose disease duration is generally very long, are also degenerative. Whether they manifest the same sets of pathological changes as those whose onset is during adult life has yet to be examined. We capitalized on a large, prospectively-assembled collection of ET brains, including both childhood-onset and adult-onset forms, to investigate whether the postmortem changes in the cerebellum differ between childhood-onset and adult-onset cases.
Methods
Brain repository, study subjects, sample size
ET brains were from the Essential Tremor Centralized Brain Repository (ETCBR), a joint effort between investigators at Yale and Columbia Universities [33; 34]. ET diagnoses were all carefully assigned using three sequential methods, as described at length [14]. Briefly, the clinical diagnosis of ET was initially assigned by treating neurologists, and then confirmed by an ETCBR study neurologist (EDL) using clinical questionnaires, review of medical records and examination of Archimedes spirals. Third, a detailed, videotaped, neurological examination was performed, and published diagnostic criteria applied, as described [35]. A total tremor score (range = 0 – 36) was assigned to each ET case based on the severity of postural and kinetic tremor (pouring, drinking, using spoon, drawing spirals, finger-nose-finger) on videotaped examination [33; 34]. None of the ET cases had a history of (1) traumatic brain injury, (2) exposure to medications known to cause cerebellar damage, or (3) heavy ethanol use, as previously defined [33; 34; 36].
Childhood-onset ET was defined as ET whose age of onset was less than or equal to 18 years of age [26].
Most of the control brains were obtained from the New York Brain Bank (NYBB) (n = 21) and were from individuals followed at the Alzheimer disease (AD) Research Center or the Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project at Columbia University [33; 34]. They had been followed prospectively with serial neurological examinations, and were clinically free of AD, ET, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Lewy body dementia, or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Nine control brains were from Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA) [33; 34]. During life, all cases and controls signed informed consent approved by these University Ethics Boards.
These analyses were performed on a sample of 90 brains comprising a 2:1 age-match of 60 ET cases and 30 controls [33; 34]. We performed a power analysis that utilized data from our previous publications on PC counts [13] and torpedo counts [7]. Our sample (11 childhood-onset ET cases, 49 adult-onset ET cases, and 30 controls) was powered at > 80% to detect differences between study groups (childhood-onset ET vs. controls, childhood-onset ET vs. adult-onset ET) of the magnitudes previously detected.
Neuropathological assessment
All ET and control brains had a complete neuropathological assessment at the NYBB and Harvard Brain Bank [33; 34]. Each brain had a standardized measurement of brain weight (grams), postmortem interval (PMI, hours between death and placement of brain in a cold room or upon ice), Braak and Braak AD staging for neurofibrillary tangles [37; 38], and Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD (CERAD) ratings for neuritic plaques [39]. We did not include any ET cases with either Lewy body pathology (α-synuclein staining) or PSP pathology [40].
Characterization of cerebellar pathology
A standard 3 × 20 × 25 mm parasagittal, formalin-fixed, tissue block was harvested from the neocerebellum; this block included cerebellar cortex, white matter and dentate nucleus [33; 34]. A senior neuropathologist (P.L.F.), blinded to clinical information, counted torpedoes and heterotopic PCs (i.e., a PC whose cell body was completely surrounded by the molecular layer and that did not contact the granule layer) throughout a single Luxol fast blue Hematoxylin & Eosin (LH&E) stained 7-μm thick section from this block [15]. PCs were counted and averaged from 15 microscopic fields at 100x magnification (LH&E) [33; 34].
We have previously shown that examination of a single, standard section provides an adequate representation of the pathology within that sample block. Using a systematic uniform random (SUR) sampling approach, one of every five sections obtained from a series of 40 collected paraffin sections from the standard cerebellar block was stained with LH&E. We determined that there was little variation in torpedo and PC counts among sampled sections within this block in 11 ET and 9 control brains. The agreement between these counts was very high (for torpedo counts, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96, p < 0.001; for PC counts, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94, p < 0.001).
In addition, a single 7-μm thick paraffin section was stained by modified Bielschowsky silver technique and a semi-quantitative basket cell plexus rating scale was applied: 0 (few, or no discernible processes); 1 (sparse number of processes); 2 (moderate number of processes); and 3 (dense tangle of processes). In some instances, as described, the rater used intermediate values (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5) [17; 33; 34].
CalbindinD28k immunohistochemistry was performed in free-floating 100 μm thick, formalin-fixed vibratome sections of cerebellar cortex to visualize PC axonal morphology. The sections were heated at 37°C for 10 min in 20 μg/ml Proteinase K (Roche Applied Science) in 10 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8, followed by 1% hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 30 min and serum blocking solution (10% normal goat serum, 1% IgG-free bovine serum albumin [Jackson Immunoresearch], 1% Triton™X-100, in PBS) for 1 hour. Rabbit polyclonal anti-calbindin D28k (1:1000, Swant) was applied overnight at 4°C in antibody diluent (1% IgG-free bovine serum albumin, 1% Triton™X-100 in PBS). Secondary antibody (1:200, 2 hours, biotin-SP goat-anti-rabbit [Fisher Scientific]), followed by streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (1:200, 1 h, AbD Serotec, for biotinlyated antibodies) was developed with 3,3′ diaminobenzidene chromogen solution (Dako). PC axonal morphology in 10 randomly-selected 100X images from three sections was quantified in each brain: axon recurrent collaterals (an axon with at least a 90° turn back towards the PC layer from its initial trajectory), thickened PC axonal profiles (an axon with at least double the width of other apparently normal axons), and PC axonal branching (any PC axon with at least one branch point; multiple bifurcations on the same axon were not separately counted). The raw counts of Purkinje cell axonal features were normalized to the total length of the Purkinje cell layer length [14; 33; 34].
Statistical analyses
We first compared clinical and pathological characteristics between ET cases and controls (Table 1), but our main analyses were to compare childhood-onset ET to controls and then childhood-onset ET to adult-onset ET (Table 2). Clinical characteristics such as gender were compared using chi-square tests. Age at death, total tremor score, and PC counts were normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p values > 0.05); thus, we compared groups using Student’s t tests. Age of tremor onset, duration of tremor, torpedo counts, heterotopic PC counts, basket cell plexus rating, PC axonal recurrent collateral counts, PC thickened axon counts, and PC axonal branching counts were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test p values < 0.05). Therefore, we used Mann-Whitney tests. Data were analyzed in SPSS (version 24).
Table 1.
Clinical and pathological features of controls and ET cases
| Variables | Controls | ET cases | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 30 | 60 | |
| Age at death (years) | 85.2 ± 5.7 | 86.0 ± 6.6 | 0.57 a |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 44.0 ± 21.6 Median = 47.5 |
NA |
| Duration of tremor (years) | NA | 42.0 ± 21.5 Median = 39.0 |
NA |
| Gender | 0.23 b | ||
| Male | 15 (50.0%) | 22 (36.7%) | |
| Female | 15 (50.0%) | 38 (63.3%) | |
| Total tremor scores | NA | 24.9 ± 6.4 | NA |
| Purkinje cell counts 1 | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.82 ± 1.48 | <0.001 a |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 Median = 3.00 |
15.38 ± 15.02 Median = 12.00 |
<0.001 c |
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts | 6.23 ± 11.45 Median = 2.00 |
7.65 ± 9.14 Median = 4.50 |
0.020 c |
| Basket cell plexus rating | 1.57 ± 0.61 Median = 1.50 |
2.00 ± 0.78 Median = 2.00 |
0.004 c |
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts | 1.01 ± 1.16 Median = 0.60 |
1.88 ± 1.53 Median = 1.42 |
0.006 c |
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts | 0.96 ± 1.60 Median = 0.55 |
1.76 ± 2.32 Median = 1.09 |
0.017 c |
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts | 0.09 ± 0.10 Median = 0.07 |
0.37 ± 0.40 Median = 0.27 |
<0.001 c |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well.
Mean number of Purkinje Cell Counts (PCs) per 100x microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields.
Independent samples t-test
Chi-square test
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
NA = not applicable.
Table 2.
Clinical and pathological features of ET cases grouped by age of onset
| Variables | Controls | ET | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Childhood-Onset ET | Adult-Onset ET | Childhood-Onset ET vs. Controls | Childhood-Onset ET vs. Adult-Onset ET | ||
| n | 30 | 11 | 49 | ||
| Age at death (years) | 85.2 ± 5.7 | 84.0 ± 9.4 | 86.5 ± 5.9 | 0.61 a | 0.26 a |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 12.1 ± 3.9 Median = 13.0 |
51.2 ± 16.9 Median = 55.0 |
NA | <0.001 c |
| Duration of tremor (years) | NA | 71.9 ± 10.2 Median = 74.0 |
35.3 ± 17.2 Median = 32.0 |
NA | <0.001 c |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 15 (50.0%) | 4 (36.4%) | 18 (36.7%) | 0.44 b | 1.00 d |
| Female | 15 (15.0%) | 7 (63.6%) | 31 (63.3%) | ||
| Total tremor scores | NA | 23.4 ± 5.6 | 25.3 ± 6.6 | NA | 0.45 a |
| Purkinje cell counts | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.99 ± 1.22 | 8.62 ± 1.98 | 0.004 a | 0.55 a |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 Median = 3.00 |
18.73 ± 22.71 Median = 13.00 |
14.63 ± 12.92 Median = 9.00 |
<0.001 c | 0.78 c |
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts | 6.23 ± 11.45 Median = 2.00 |
10.45 ± 13.94 Median = 6.00 |
7.02 ± 7.74 Median = 4.00 |
0.04 c | 0.45 c |
| Basket cell plexus rating | 1.57 ± 0.61 Median = 1.50 |
2.10 ± 0.58 Median = 2.00 |
1.98 ± 0.82 Median = 2.00 |
0.03 c | 0.80 c |
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts | 1.01 ± 1.16 Median = 0.60 |
1.66 ± 1.14 Median = 1.28 |
1.94 ± 1.63 Median = 1.51 |
0.059 c | 0.78 c |
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts | 0.96 ± 1.60 Median = 0.55 |
1.08 ± 0.82 Median = 0.99 |
1.94 ± 2.56 Median = 1.09 |
0.24 c | 0.49 c |
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts | 0.09 ± 0.10 Median = 0.07 |
0.30 ± 0.27 Median = 0.34 |
0.39 ± 0.43 Median = 0.27 |
0.14 c | 0.64 c |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well.
Mean number of Purkinje Cell Counts (PCs) per 100x microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields.
Student’s t test
Chi-square test
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
Fisher’s exact test
Results
The 60 ET cases and 30 controls were similar in age at death and gender (Table 1). When compared with controls, ET cases had lower PC counts, more torpedoes, more heterotopic PCs, a higher basket cell plexus rating, an increase in PC axonal collaterals, an increase in PC thickened axonal profiles, and an increase in PC axonal branching (Table 1).
We compared the clinical characteristics of cases with childhood-onset ET to controls (Table 2). There were no differences in age at death or gender (Table 2). Childhood-onset ET cases had lower PC counts, higher torpedo counts, higher heterotopic PC counts, higher basket cell plexus rating, and marginally higher (p = 0.059) PC axonal recurrent collateral counts than controls (Table 2). The median PC thickened axonal profile count and median PC axonal branching count were two to five times higher in childhood-onset ET than controls, but the differences did not reach statistical significance in this small sample (Table 2).
We compared the clinical characteristics of cases with childhood-onset ET to cases with adult-onset ET (Table 2). There were no differences in age at death or gender (Table 2). As expected, childhood-onset ET cases had a younger mean age of tremor onset and a longer duration of tremor than adult-onset ET cases. The two groups did not differ with respect to total tremor score. The two groups were similar in terms of PC counts, torpedo counts, heterotopic PC counts, basket cell plexus rating, PC axonal recurrent collateral counts, PC thickened axonal profile count and PC axonal branching count (Table 2, Figure 1).
Figure 1.
(A–D) Childhood-Onset essential tremor (ET) cases, (E–H) Adult-Onset ET cases, (I–L) Controls.
A,E. Purkinje cell (PC) axonal torpedo (arrow) in ET cases, Luxol fast blue Hematoxylin & Eosin (LH&E) x 400. No torpedo is seen in the control (I).
B,F. Heterotopic PC (arrow) mislocalized in the molecular layer, LH&E x200. A heterotopic PC is not visualized in the control (J).
C,G. Dense tangle of processes (basket plexus), Bielschowsky x200. No dense tangle is seen in the control (K).
D,H. Calbindin PC axonal branching (arrows) and recurrent collaterals (carets), x200. The axons appear normal in the control (L).
Discussion
We investigated whether postmortem changes in the cerebellum differ in childhood-onset vs. adult-onset ET. To our knowledge, this specific issue has not been addressed in the literature in prior analyses. We found that childhood-onset and adult-onset ET shared similar pathological changes in cerebellum. The data suggest that pathological changes we have observed in the cerebellum in ET are a part of the pathophysiological cascade of events in both forms of the disease. The data also suggest that both groups seem to reach the same pathological endpoints at a similar age of death.
Is it possible that a disease can begin in childhood, and then continue with a slow form of degeneration over 50 – 70 years into adulthood? There are certainly several examples of this in the cerebellar degenerations. For example, some forms of SCA, such as SCA13, SCA14 and SCA28 [41; 42; 43; 44], begin in childhood and/or early adult life, progress very slowly and may be associated with a normal lifespan. In some (e.g., SCA13), the disease, which begins in childhood, is even considered degenerative yet non-progressive [41; 42].
Clinically, while childhood-onset ET cases are more often familial than adult-onset cases [32], there have been no consistently reported clinical differences between childhood-onset and adult-onset ET cases. Hence, it is possible that postmortem features are overall similar as well. It is also possible that the postmortem changes we have observed are non-specific cellular changes rather than disease-specific molecular changes that are more proximate to the underlying cause of ET. It may be that the differences between childhood-onset and adult-onset ET will eventually become more apparent on a molecular level, once the molecular bases for ET are better explored.
One may ask, in other neurodegenerative disease, how juvenile and adult-onset cases compare with one another in terms of postmortem features. In Huntington’s disease, a number of postmortem features are more likely to occur in individuals with juvenile-onset than adult-onset disease, including the presence of greater diffuse atrophy, the presence of severe atrophy of the internal segment of the globus pallidum, and the blurring of the striatal gradient of severity of neuronal loss and reactive gliosis (e.g., the relative preservation of the nucleus accumbens is no longer visible or identifiable) [45]. Individuals with juvenile-onset Parkinson’s disease have been classified into three groups: (1) cases whose pathological features do not differ from those with adult-onset disease, (2) cases with more severe neuronal degeneration with more widespread Lewy bodies, and (3) familial cases with deficient or absent melanin in the substantia nigra, in the presence of nigral Lewy bodies [46]. However, other patterns exist - other familial juvenile Parkinson’s disease cases do not have Lewy bodies [47]. In summary, some juvenile onset Parkinson’s disease cases seem to exhibit postmortem changes that differ from adult-onset Parkinson’s disease cases whereas others do not.
This study should be interpreted within the context of several potential limitations. First, we did not directly compare pathological features in other relevant brain areas that are connected to the cerebellar cortex as part of functional-physiological loops (e.g., thalamus, inferior olivary nucleus). Nonetheless, we have not observed any changes in these brain regions in ET to date. With specific regards to the inferior olivary nucleus, in our study comparing a range of microscopic changes in this brain region in ET cases and controls, there were no differences [48]. Second, we did not employ stereological methods for PC counts; nonetheless, we have previously validated PC counting with a random sampling approach [19]. Third, age of onset was based on self-report. Prior studies have indicated that age of tremor onset is reliably reported by ET patients [49]. Indeed, the test-retest reliability for reported age of onset in ET, r, was 0.91, and among individuals with younger age of onset it was even higher, with r = 0.99 [49]. In 75% of cases, the difference in reported ages was ± 5 years. Fourth, the number of childhood-onset cases was small; nonetheless, we were able to detect significant differences between childhood-onset ET and controls for most postmortem features, even with this small sample. Finally, future studies comparing molecular markers would be of value and could be more sensitive; at the moment, however, none have been identified for ET.
Our study had several strengths. First, we investigated a carefully-diagnosed ET cohort. Second, we studied a broad range of postmortem features. Third, our sample included not only comparison of ET groups but a control group as well.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we found that childhood-onset and adult-onset ET shared similar pathological changes in the cerebellum. The data suggest that pathological changes we have observed in the cerebellum in ET are a part of the pathophysiological cascade of events in both forms of the disease and that both groups seem to reach the same pathological endpoints at a similar age of death.
Highlights.
Little is known about the underlying pathology of childhood onset ET
Do childhood- and adult-onset ET share the same degenerative cerebellar pathology?
We quantified a range of postmortem changes in childhood- and adult-onset ET cases
In all measures, both forms of this disease shared similar cerebellar pathology
Childhood- and adult-onset ET both exhibit degenerative changes in the cerebellum
Acknowledgments
Dr. Louis has received research support from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS #R01 NS094607 (principal investigator), NINDS #R01 NS085136 (principal investigator), NINDS #R01 NS073872 (principal investigator), NINDS #R01 NS085136 (principal investigator) and NINDS #R01 NS088257 (principal investigator). He has also received support from the Claire O’Neil Essential Tremor Research Fund (Yale University). Dr. Kuo has received funding from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS #K08 NS083738 (principal investigator), and the Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Scholar Award, Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, and International Essential Tremor Foundation. Dr. Faust has received funding from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS #R01 NS088257 (principal investigator) and NINDS #R01 NS085136 (principal investigator). The sponsor had no role in the conduct of the research or the preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
The authors had no conflicts of interest. Each of the authors participated in a substantive manner with the research and in the preparation of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010;25:534–541. doi: 10.1002/mds.22838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Seijo-Martinez M, Del Rio MC, Alvarez JR, Prado RS, Salgado ET, Esquete JP, Sobrido-Gomez MJ. Prevalence of essential tremor on Arosa Island, Spain: a community-based, door-to-door survey. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2013;3 doi: 10.7916/D89P30BB. pii: tre-03-192-4299-1. eCollection 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bhalsing KS, Saini J, Pal PK. Understanding the pathophysiology of essential tremor through advanced neuroimaging: A review. J Neurol Sci. 2013;335:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grimaldi G, Manto M. Is essential tremor a Purkinjopathy? The role of the cerebellar cortex in its pathogenesis. Mov Disord. 2013;28:1759–1761. doi: 10.1002/mds.25645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Helmchen C, Hagenow A, Miesner J, Sprenger A, Rambold H, Wenzelburger R, Heide W, Deuschl G. Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor may indicate cerebellar dysfunction. Brain. 2003;126:1319–1332. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bares M, Husarova I, Lungu OV. Essential tremor, the cerebellum, and motor timing: towards integrating them into one complex entity. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2012;2 pii: tre-02-93-653-1. Epub 2012 Sep 12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gitchel GT, Wetzel PA, Baron MS. Slowed saccades and increased square wave jerks in essential tremor. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2013;3 doi: 10.7916/D8251GXN. pii: tre-03-178-4116-2. eCollection 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Louis ED, Frucht SJ, Rios E. Intention tremor in essential tremor: Prevalence and association with disease duration. Mov Disord. 2009;24:626–627. doi: 10.1002/mds.22370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Benito-Leon J, Labiano-Fontcuberta A. Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum: clinical evidence. Cerebellum. 2016;15:253–262. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0741-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cerasa A, Quattrone A. Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum-neuroimaging evidence. Cerebellum. 2016;15:263–275. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0739-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shin DH, Han BS, Kim HS, Lee PH. Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with essential tremor. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:151–153. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Quattrone A, Cerasa A, Messina D, Nicoletti G, Hagberg GE, Lemieux L, Novellino F, Lanza P, Arabia G, Salsone M. Essential head tremor is associated with cerebellar vermis atrophy: a volumetric and voxel-based morphometry MR imaging study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1692–1697. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Rajput A, Robinson CA, Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Ross GW, Borden S, Moskowitz CB, Lawton A, Hernandez N. Neuropathological changes in essential tremor: 33 cases compared with 21 controls. Brain. 2007;130:3297–3307. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Babij R, Lee M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL, Louis ED. Purkinje cell axonal anatomy: quantifying morphometric changes in essential tremor versus control brains. Brain. 2013;136:3051–3061. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuo SH, Erickson-Davis C, Gillman A, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Louis ED. Increased number of heterotopic Purkinje cells in essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:1038–1040. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.213330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kuo SH, Tang G, Louis ED, Ma K, Babji R, Balatbat M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Yamamoto A, Sulzer D, Faust PL. Lingo-1 expression is increased in essential tremor cerebellum and is present in the basket cell pinceau. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:879–889. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1108-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Erickson-Davis CR, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Gupta S, Honig LS, Louis ED. “Hairy baskets” associated with degenerative Purkinje cell changes in essential tremor. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69:262–271. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181d1ad04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Axelrad JE, Louis ED, Honig LS, Flores I, Ross GW, Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP. Reduced purkinje cell number in essential tremor: a postmortem study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:101–107. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Choe M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JG, Kuo SH, Faust PL, Louis ED. Purkinje cell loss in essential tremor: Random sampling quantification and nearest neighbor analysis. Mov Disord. 2016;31:393–401. doi: 10.1002/mds.26490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Symanski C, Shill HA, Dugger B, Hentz JG, Adler CH, Jacobson SA, Driver-Dunckley E, Beach TG. Essential tremor is not associated with cerebellar Purkinje cell loss. Mov Disord. 2014;29:496–500. doi: 10.1002/mds.25845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rajput AH, Robinson CA, Rajput ML, Robinson SL, Rajput A. Essential tremor is not dependent upon cerebellar Purkinje cell loss. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:626–628. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Louis ED. Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum: Neuropathological Evidence. Cerebellum. 2016;15:235–242. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0692-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Benito-Leon J. Essential tremor: a neurodegenerative disease? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014;4:252. doi: 10.7916/D8765CG0. eCollection 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bonuccelli U. Essential tremor is a neurodegenerative disease. J Neural Transm. 2012;119:1383–1387. doi: 10.1007/s00702-012-0878-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rajput AH, Offord KP, Beard CM, Kurland LT. Essential tremor in Rochester, Minnesota: a 45-year study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:466–470. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.5.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Louis ED, St Dure L, Pullman S. Essential tremor in childhood: a series of nineteen cases. Mov Disord. 2001;16:921–923. doi: 10.1002/mds.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jankovic J, Madisetty J, Vuong KD. Essential tremor among children. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1203–1205. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tan EK, Lum SY, Prakash KM. Clinical features of childhood onset essential tremor. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:1302–1305. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01471.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Louis ED, Dogu O. Does age of onset in essential tremor have a bimodal distribution? Data from a tertiary referral setting and a population-based study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29:208–212. doi: 10.1159/000111584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Paulson GW. Benign essential tremor in childhood: Symptoms, pathogenesis, treatment. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1976;15:67–70. doi: 10.1177/000992287601500112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Louis ED, Hernandez N, Rabinowitz D, Ottman R, Clark LN. Predicting age of onset in familial essential tremor: how much does age of onset run in families? Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40:269–273. doi: 10.1159/000345253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Louis ED, Clark LN, Ottman R. Familial versus sporadic essential tremor: what patterns can one decipher in age of onset? Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44:166–172. doi: 10.1159/000381807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuo SH, Wang J, Tate WJ, Pan MK, Kelly GC, Gutierrez J, Cortes EP, Vonsattel JG, Louis ED, Faust PL. Cerebellar Pathology in early onset and late onset essential tremor. Cerebellum. 2016;16:473–482. doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0826-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Louis ED, Kuo SH, Wang J, Tate WJ, Pan MK, Kelly GC, Gutierrez J, Cortes EP, Vonsattel JG, Faust PL. Cerebellar pathology in familial vs. sporadic essential tremor. Cerebellum. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s12311-017-0853-x. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Louis ED, Ottman R, Ford B, Pullman S, Martinez M, Fahn S, Hauser WA. The Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor: methodologic issues in essential-tremor research. Neuroepidemiology. 1997;16:124–133. doi: 10.1159/000109681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Harasymiw JW, Bean P. Identification of heavy drinkers by using the early detection of alcohol consumption score. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25:228–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Braak H, Braak E. Diagnostic criteria for neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:S85–88. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112:389–404. doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mirra SS. The CERAD neuropathology protocol and consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a commentary. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:S91–94. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Louis ED, Babij R, Ma K, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP. Essential tremor followed by progressive supranuclear palsy: postmortem reports of 11 patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:8–17. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31827ae56e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Montaut S, Apartis E, Chanson JB, Ewenczyk C, Renaud M, Guissart C, Muller J, Legrand AP, Durr A, Laugel V, Koenig M, Tranchant C, Anheim M. SCA13 causes dominantly inherited non-progressive myoclonus ataxia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;38:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Khare S, Nick JA, Zhang Y, Galeano K, Butler B, Khoshbouei H, Rayaprolu S, Hathorn T, Ranum LPW, Smithson L, Golde TE, Paucar M, Morse R, Raff M, Simon J, Nordenskjold M, Wirdefeldt K, Rincon-Limas DE, Lewis J, Kaczmarek LK, Fernandez-Funez P, Nick HS, Waters MF. A KCNC3 mutation causes a neurodevelopmental, non-progressive SCA13 subtype associated with dominant negative effects and aberrant EGFR trafficking. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zuhlke C, Mikat B, Timmann D, Wieczorek D, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Burk K. Spinocerebellar ataxia 28: a novel AFG3L2 mutation in a German family with young onset, slow progression and saccadic slowing. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2015;2:19. doi: 10.1186/s40673-015-0038-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen DH, Raskind WH, Bird TD. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;103:555–559. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51892-7.00036-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vonsattel JP, Keller C, Cortes Ramirez EP. Huntington’s disease - neuropathology. Handb Clin Neurol. 2011;100:83–100. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52014-2.00004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yoshimura N, Yoshimura I, Asada M, Hayashi S, Fukushima Y, Sato T, Kudo H. Juvenile Parkinson’s disease with widespread Lewy bodies in the brain. Acta Neuropathol. 1988;77:213–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00687434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Takahashi H, Ohama E, Suzuki S, Horikawa Y, Ishikawa A, Morita T, Tsuji S, Ikuta F. Familial juvenile parkinsonism: clinical and pathologic study in a family. Neurology. 1994;44:437–441. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.3_part_1.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Louis ED, Babij R, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL. The inferior olivary nucleus: a postmortem study of essential tremor cases versus controls. Mov Disord. 2013;28:779–786. doi: 10.1002/mds.25400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Louis ED, Schonberger RB, Parides M, Ford B, Barnes LF. Test-retest reliability of patient information on age of onset in essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2000;15:738–741. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200007)15:4<738::aid-mds1024>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

