Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Oct 2;7:12519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12801-w

Local disorder in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-piezoceramic determined by 3D electron diffuse scattering

Alexandra Neagu 1,, Cheuk-Wai Tai 1,
PMCID: PMC5624983  PMID: 28970571

Abstract

Local structural distortions in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-based solid solutions have been proved to play a crucial role in understanding and tuning their enhanced piezoelectric properties near the morphotropic phase boundary. In this work all local structural disorders in a lead-free ternary system, namely 85%Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-10%Bi0.5K0.5TiO3-5%BaTiO3, were mapped in reciprocal space by 3D electron diffraction. Furthermore, a comprehensive model of the local disorder was developed by analysing the intensity and morphology of the observed weak diffuse scattering. We found that the studied ceramics consists of plate-like in-phase oxygen octahedral nanoscale domains randomly distributed in an antiphase tilted matrix. In addition, A-site chemical short-range order of Na/Bi and polar displacements contribute to different kinds of diffuse scattering. The proposed model explains all the observed diffraction features and offers insight into the ongoing controversy over the nature of local structural distortions in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-based solid solutions.

Introduction

Recent environmental regulations have questioned the use of lead-based piezoceramics in electronic applications owing to the high toxicity of lead and its derivatives, particularly lead oxide1,2. This has caused a recent surge in finding new lead-free piezoceramics3,4. One common ion used as a replacement for Pb2+ is Bi3+, a similarly heavy ion with a lone pair5. The majority of studies have focused on binary systems like Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3 (NBT-BT) and Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-Bi0.5K0.5TiO3 (NBT-BKT) which present improved dielectric and piezoelectric properties6,7. Recently, a ternary compound (NBT-BKT-BT), which has comparable dielectric and piezoelectric properties to those of lead-based piezoceramics, has been proposed. Similar to Pb-based piezoceramics, the enhanced properties of these Pb-free compounds are found at the MPB boundary6,811 and are of interest for electrical and electromechanical applications.

Despite a significant number of studies there is still an ongoing debate over the average and local structures of NBT and its solid solutions. Early diffraction studies1214 suggest a rhombohedral R3c symmetry for NBT with polar cation displacements combined with antiphase oxygen octahedral rotations (a ¯ a ¯ a ¯ tilt system in Glazer notation15). More recent high-resolution X-ray studies16,17 propose, on the other hand, a monoclinic Cc symmetry with a a c octahedral tilting. Another proposed structure suggests that the equilibrium state of NBT at room temperature consists of a coexistence of R3c and Cc phases18. The existing controversy over the average structure of NBT was further enhanced by several TEM studies that confirmed both the rhombohedral19 and monoclinic20 symmetries. Moreover, there is also a mismatch between the macroscopic properties and the temperature-dependent phase transitions. Structural studies propose two phase transitions. One at ~296 °C from a ferroelectric rhombohedral R3c structure to a ferroelectric tetragonal P4bm structure and one at ~566 °C from a ferroelectric tetragonal P4bm structure to a paraelectric cubic Pm3¯m structure14. However, the piezoelectricity in poled NBT ceramics is lost upon heating at ~187 °C 21,22, so called depolarization temperature. The difficulty in assigning a definitive average structure for NBT-based materials and the mismatch with the macroscopic properties stems from the short range order/disorder present in these types of materials. Several studies have tried to tackle this problem using EXAFS23,24, NMR25, X-ray diffuse scattering2631, TEM3235, pair-distribution function (PDF)5,36 or DFT calculations3741. EXAFS measurements23 suggest a highly distorted local coordination for Bi with a shorter minimum Bi-O bond of 2.2 Å than the one proposed by diffraction experiments, which is 2.5 Å. RMC refinement of PDF data reveals an anisotropic Bi-O bonding5,36 which suggest that Bi is strongly displaced off-center in the oxygen polyhedron. Most X-ray diffuse scattering studies2628,31 report two types of diffuse features: (i) broad diffuse regions around all Bragg peaks that have been modelled using a pseudorandom occupation of the A-site by Na/Bi together with an atomic size effect26 and (ii) “L-shaped” diffuse streaks that emanate from the Bragg peaks and extend towards lower q-values which have been explained by assuming the presence of nanometer-scale platelet structures of highly correlated Na/Bi atomic positions, analogous to Guinier Preston zones (GPZs)26. From TEM studies two models have been proposed in order to explain the observed superstructure reflections and diffuse scattering intensity. One consists of tetragonal platelets with a 0 a 0 c + oxygen octahedral tilt distributed in a rhombohedral matrix with a a a octahedral tilt33,34 while the second one consists of pseudo-rhombohedral assemblages of nanoscale orthorhombic domains that present a a c + octahedral tilting35.

Even though NBT and its solid solutions with BT and BKT have been intensively studied a deep understanding of the local structure in NBT-based compounds is still lacking. In this work a novel rotation electron diffraction (RED) method42,43 was used to investigate the long- and short-range structure for a NBT-ternary ceramic, namely 85%Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-10%Bi0.5K0.5TiO3-5%BaTiO3 (85NBT-10BKT-5BT) with optimized composition near the MPB911,44,45. The RED method has already been applied with success for determination of the average structure in complex materials such as zeolites46. The use of electrons instead of X-rays or neutrons for diffuse scattering studies has a significant advantage since electrons interact stronger with matter (106 stronger than X-rays). The strong electron-matter interaction makes it possible to easily record superstructure reflections and weak diffuse scattering intensity with good signal-to-noise ratio. Also the fact that the RED method provides a 3D reciprocal-space volume makes the analysis of diffuse scattering intensity more straight forward than in the case of 2D electron diffraction patterns. Furthermore DISCUS47,48 software was used to generate disordered atomic structures and compute the corresponding calculated data, i.e. electron diffraction patterns. Here, we propose a structural model to explain all the observed electron diffuse scattering intensity and superstructure reflections. To our knowledge this is the first time 3D electron diffuse scattering result together with a comprehensive structural model for understanding the local disorder in a NBT-ternary compound are reported.

Results

3D electron diffuse scattering

Due to the strong electron-mater interaction the RED method is well suited for studying small local structural deviations. Our approach is to use this technique to finely map the reciprocal-space for materials with disordered structures and record simultaneously both Bragg reflections and diffuse scattering intensity. Earlier studies of both pure NBT26,28,33,35 and NBT-BT2931 have revealed a highly disordered structure for these materials, so 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ternary solid solution represents a good candidate for the study of short-range order/disorder by 3D electron diffraction. Figure 1a displays a TEM image of the grain used for RED data collection. Care was taken to avoid the damaged amorphous edge, so the SAED aperture was placed in the middle of the grain during the entire data collection. A general view of the reconstructed 3D reciprocal-space volume displaying both Bragg reflections and diffuse scattering intensity is shown in Fig. 1b. Since the reconstruction of the 3D reciprocal-space volume implies simply combining the individual 2D SAED patterns, the reconstructed result does not suffer from distortions produced by the missing wedge as is the case for tomography where back-projection algorithm is used. In Fig. 1(c–e) a schematic representation of the 3D reciprocal-space is shown in order to differentiate between a slice/volume-section through the 3D reciprocal-space volume and the whole reciprocal-space volume. A slice along a certain plane is equivalent to a typical SAED pattern. A big advantage of the RED method is that one can cut slices that are not at zero Laue-zone which simplifies the analysis of diffuse scattering intensity. A thin volume-section, centered along a particular slice, was generally used to highlight certain diffuse scattering features that were not clearly visible in the single slice. The lack of visibility of diffuse scattering intensity at low order ZAs is discussed later in the section. On the other hand, viewing the whole reciprocal-space volume oriented along different directions enabled a 3D analysis of the diffuse scattering features. In Fig. 2(a–c) the whole 3D reciprocal-space volume for 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ternary ceramic was projected along the three main pseudocubic directions [001]pc, [010]pc and [001]pc, respectively. Besides the fundamental perovskite reflections three extra features have been observed. The first feature comprises of two types of superstructure reflections ½(ooe) and ½(ooo) (where o stands for odd and e for even). All three variants of the ½(ooe) superstructure reflection, namely ½(ooe) ½(oeo) and ½(eoo), are present as confirmed by the fact that they can be seen along all three main pseudocubic directions (Fig. 2(a–c)). Moreover all three variants can be simultaneously observed in the [111]pc zone axis (Supplementary Fig. S1c). The ½(ooo) superstructure reflections were observed for [011]pc zone axis as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1b. The second feature is broad diffuse scattering intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections. This feature can be clearly seen for reflections close to the direct beam i.e. 110, −110, 1-10, -1-10 (Fig. 2a) and tends to be concentrated at positions in between fundamental perovskite reflections. The third feature comprises of continuous diffuse scattering rods (Fig. 2(a–c)) along all 3 main pseudocubic directions [00 l]pc *, [0k0]pc * and [h00]pc * respectively. For simplicity and convenience of comparison pseudocubic axes (Pm3¯m) have been used for indexing throughout the paper. Figure 3 shows the projection of the whole reciprocal-space volume along [100]pc direction together with a volume-section centered on the hk0 plane and the hk0.5 slice. A closer look reveals the fact that the diffuse scattering rods are present only in hk0.5-type slices, as can be seen in Fig. 3c. Moreover, increased intensity can be observed at positions of ½(ooe) reflections as indicated by white arrows. In order to highlight the weak broad diffuse intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections instead of a slice, a volume-section was cut around the hk0 plane (Fig. 3b). The projection centered on the hk0 slice does not contain any diffuse scattering rods but broad diffuse intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections can be clearly observed (i.e. the region centered on the direct beam depicted by the white square). A closer look at the individual electron diffraction frames reveals the fact that broad diffuse intensity can be easily observed for SAED patterns slightly away from exact ZA while close to ZA this feature seems to disappear (Supplementary Fig. S2). The lack of visibility for diffuse scattering intensity at low order ZAs has been reported before for a number of different materials4951. One proposed explanation is that at exact ZA compositional and/or displacive disorder is averaged out along the atomic columns leading to no net modulation49,50. Another explanation is that for crystals ≥ 200 nm thick a strong channeling effect at low order ZAs leads to a smearing into the background of any diffuse scattering intensity51.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

3D reciprocal-space volume. (a) TEM image of the 85NBT-10BKT-5BT grain used for RED data collection i.e. the area delimited by the red contour. (b) General view of the reconstructed 3D reciprocal-space volume displaying both Bragg reflections and diffuse scattering intensity. (c) Schematic representation of a slice through the 3D reciprocal-space volume. (d) Schematic representation of a volume-section through the 3D reciprocal-space volume. (e) Schematic representation of the whole reciprocal-space volume.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

3D reciprocal-space volume projected along the 3 main perovskite pseudocubic directions. The whole reciprocal-space volume projected along (a) [001]pc direction, (b) [010]pc direction and (c) [100]pc direction, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Separating different diffuse scattering features using slices/volume-sections through the 3D reciprocal-space volume. (a) The whole 3D reciprocal-space volume projected along [100]pc. (b) The volume-section centered on the hk0 slice, outlined by the red dash rectangle in (a), reveals ½(ooe) superstructure reflections and broad diffuse scattering intensity around the fundamental perovskite reflections. (c) hk0.5 slice outlined by the blue dotted line in (a). Continuous diffuse scattering rods can be observed along [h00]pc * and [0k0]pc * directions with increased intensity at positions of ½(ooe) reflections as indicated by white arrows.

The 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ternary compound has a composition near the MPB911,44,45 where a competition between rhombohedral (R3c) and tetragonal (P4bm) symmetries exists. The rhombohedral symmetry is characterized by a ¯ a ¯ a ¯ antiphase tilt system which produces ½(ooo) superstructure reflections while the tetragonal symmetry is characterized by a 0 a 0 c + in-phase tilt system which produces ½(ooe) superstructure reflections. Similar superstructure reflections have also been reported for NBT-BT binary compounds52,53 and other NBT-BKT-BT compositions11,54 near the MPB. Besides the superstructure reflections that can help us identify the type of octahedral tilting, the RED data contains diffuse scattering intensities that give insight into the short-range structure. Few synchrotron X-ray studies have reported similar diffuse scattering features for NBT26,28 and NBT-BT single crystals2931. The observed diffuse scattering intensities have been attributed to planar defects of highly correlated Na/Bi atomic positions analogous to GPZs26,29. However, no definitive structural model that explains both superstructure reflections and diffuse scattering intensities has been reported for this type of materials. In order to explain the observed superstructure reflections and diffuse scattering intensities three different mechanisms of structural distortion have been taken into consideration: (1) tilting of oxygen octahedra; (2) polar displacements of all ions; (3) short range chemical order on the A-site.

Dark-field imaging of antiphase and in-phase nanosized domains

In order to determine the size and distribution of a a a and a 0 a 0 c + domains, dark-field images taken using ½(ooo) and ½(ooe) superstructure reflections have been recorded. Figure 4b is a representative dark-field image of a a a domains (bright contrast), which was recorded using the -3/2 3/2 1/2 reflection along [110]pc ZA as highlighted by the red circle in Fig. 4a. A non-uniform distribution can be observed for the antiphase domains with regions of large and low concentration of bright speckles, indicating that some areas are highly populated by a a a domains (red circle in Fig. 4b) while in others few a a a domains are found. Figure 4d is a representative dark-field image of a 0 a 0 c + domains. The image was recorded using the -3/2 1/2 1 reflection along [111]pc ZA, as highlighted by the blue circle in Fig. 4c. In contrast to the a a a domains a uniform distribution of the a 0 a 0 c + domains could be observed. The size of the a a a domains was less than ~8 nm across while the size of a 0 a 0 c + domains was less than ~12 nm across which is in good agreement with other reported values55. The [111]pc ZA simultaneously presents ½(ooe) ½(oeo) and ½(eoo) superstructure reflections indicating that in the case of a 0 a 0 c + domains a given region consists of a mixture of three variants of in-phase oxygen octahedral tilted domains, of which tilting axes are along three orthogonal directions rather than a single domain tilted along a unique orientation. Moreover, these superstructure reflections are slightly elongated as can be seen in the inset in Fig. 4c, suggesting that the in-phase tilted domains have a plate-like shape. The dark contrast in both dark-field images corresponds to regions with octahedral tilting about a different axis than the antiphase/in-phase tilting or regions without octahedral tilting. Since the nanosized octahedral tilted domains do not follow the macroscopic polarization direction or ferroelectric domain wall, we can conclude that the octahedral tilting is confined to the nanoscale33,54,55 and the long-range order of octahedral tilting is absent.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Dark-field images of nanosized antiphase and in-phase octahedral tilted domains. SAED patterns taken along (a) [110]pc and (c) [111]pc zone axes, respectively. Dark-field images of these nanosized domains taken by (b) ½(ooo) superstructure reflection, as indicated by the red circle in (a) and (d) ½(ooe) superstructure reflection, as indicated by the blue circle in (c). The red circle in (b) highlights a region with a high concentration of a a a domains. The inset in (c) shows an enlarged view of the slightly elongated ½(ooe) superstructure reflection, highlighted by the blue circle.

Modeling of local disorder

Computer simulations of disordered structures can aid the interpretation of diffuse scattering data and both qualitative and quantitative models can be obtained in this way56,57. In the present work DISCUS47,48 was used to develop a model for the local disorder in 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ternary ceramic that explains the observed superstructure reflections and diffuse scattering intensities. The experimental data revealed the presence of two types of superstructure reflections: ½(ooe) and ½(ooo). This suggests a coexistence of two different oxygen octahedral tilting systems, one in-phase a 0 a 0 c + and the other one antiphase a ¯ a ¯ a ¯. Mixed octahedral tilting systems have been excluded since ½(oee) superstructure reflections have not been observed for this compound either by RED or SAED. Previous XRD studies911,44,45 of NBT-BKT-BT ternary compounds suggest that the studied composition is near the MPB where a competition between rhombohedral and tetragonal symmetries exists. Moreover, with the RED technique continuous diffuse scattering rods were recorded for hk0.5-type slices. The rods are along [00 l]pc *, [0k0]pc * and [h00]pc * directions with increased intensity at positions of ½(ooe) reflections. Diffuse scattering rods in reciprocal-space are commonly attributed to planar defects in real-space. Therefore, the observed diffuse scattering rods are consistent with the notion that plate-like nanoscale domains of in-phase octahedral tilting are embedded in a matrix with antiphase octahedral tilting3234. The model we developed builds on this idea. In addition polar displacements and short range chemical order have also been considered.

The model of local structural disorder in 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ceramic was constructed using the following methodology. First a matrix was created comprising of antiphase tilted oxygen octahedra. Further, nanometer-sized in-phase tilted domains were randomly introduced in the matrix. Last, different configurations of A-site short range chemical order and polar displacements were tested. In the case of scattering intensities DISCUS47,48 basically calculates the Fourier transform according to the standard formula for kinematic scattering given in equation (1).

F(h)=i=1Nfi(h)e2πhri 1

the sum is over all N atoms in the supercell, where f i is the atomic form factor for atom i and r i are the fractional coordinates of the atom. The sum is calculated over all points h in reciprocal space within the plane or volume of interest. The form factors are tabulated58 and calculated once at each h for all atoms present in the crystal. Once the structure factor F(h) is calculated, the scattering intensity is simply computed as I(h) = F(hF *(h).

As initial model a 3D supercell made up of 50 × 50 × 50 cubic unit cells (space group Pm3¯m and a = 3.8894 Å) was created. In the initial model all atoms occupy the ideal positions as in the cubic perovskite structure with Bi3+, Na+, Ba2+ and K+ sharing the (0.5, 0.5, 0.5) position, Ti4+ at the (0.0, 0.0, 0.0) position and O2- at (0.5, 0.0, 0.0) position. The antiphase matrix was created by tilting all oxygen octahedra according to the a ¯ a ¯ a ¯ octahedral tilt system. If the oxygen octahedra tilting is considered as a combination of individual tilts about three Cartesian axes the final structure depends on the order in which the tilts were applied15,59. To avoid this problem we have considered the antiphase tilting for a ¯ a ¯ a ¯ system as a single operation about <111>pc axis59. As required by the a ¯ a ¯ a ¯ antiphase system alternating layers have been tilted about the <111>pc axis with angles of 8° and −8° respectively, as schematically depicted in Fig. 5b. The value for the antiphase angle was chosen based on reported values for the octahedron tilt angle in pure NBT14. To ensure an anisotropic antiphase tilting the matrix was created from small antiphase tilted domains (6 × 6 × 6 unit cells) where alternating layers with 8° and −8° tilting angles were stacked along [001]pc, [010]pc and [100]pc directions. These a ¯ a ¯ a ¯ domains were randomly distributed and allowed to overlap. The size was less than ~10 nm across and is in good agreement with the size measured from dark-field images (less than ~8 nm across). The next step was to build the in-phase tilted domains. The ideal perovskite structure was again used as starting point followed by oxygen octahedra tilting. As enforced by in-phase tilting system (a 0 a 0 c +) all oxygen octahedra were tilted about [001]pc direction. For simplicity the same value of the tilting angle was chosen for both antiphase and in-phase tilting. The a 0 a 0 c + in-phase tilt system is schematically represented in Fig. 5a. Three in-phase tilted domain variants with a 0 a 0 c +, a 0 c + a 0 and c + a 0 a 0 tilt systems have been randomly embedded in the antiphase tilted matrix and allowed to overlap. Following parameters have also been thoroughly tested: antiphase/in-phase tilted system ratio, size of domains and shape of domains. The antiphase/in-phase tilt ratio is considered 100/0 when no in-phase domains are in the structure and 50/50 when 50% of the antiphase tilted matrix has been replaced by in-phase domains. Different ratios (100/0, 90/10, 70/30, 50/50, 30/70 and 10/90) have been tested as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S3. For these simulations three in-phase domain variants of 10 × 10 × 2, 10 × 2 × 10 and 2 × 10 × 10 unit cells large were used. The short dimension of tetragonal domains corresponds to the direction about which the oxygen octahedra were tilted, namely [001]pc, [010]pc and [100]pc. The experimental data revealed the presence of diffuse scattering rods in hk0.5 slice with increased intensity at positions of ½(ooe) reflections. This diffuse scattering feature is the most prominent one, so in order to compare different parameters the hk0.5 reciprocal-space plane was calculated using the kinematical approximation. Comparing the morphology and intensity of the diffuse scattering rods in the models with different antiphase/in-phase tilting ratios (Supplementary Fig. S3), one can conclude that the concentration of in-phase domains needs to be higher than 50% for a good match between the experimental and simulated data to be obtained. This indicates that the studied composition (85NBT-10BKT-5BT) is closer to the tetragonal side of the MPB rather than the rhombohedral side. This is in good agreement with the reported tetragonal average structure for this composition10.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic representation of local structural disorder in 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ceramic along [001]pc direction. (a) Schematic representation of in-phase a 0 a 0 c + tilt system. (b) Schematic representation of antiphase a a a tilt system. (c) A small region of a 2D slice cut from a 50 × 50 × 50 supercell showing the three in-phase variants randomly distributed in the antiphase tilted matrix (red octahedra tilted according to a a a tilt system). The blue octahedra are tilted according to a 0 a 0 c + tilt system while the green and magenta octahedra are tilted according to a 0 c + a 0 and c + a 0 a 0 tilt systems. The antiphase/in-phase ratio is 30/70 and the initial sizes of in-phase variants are 10 × 10 × 2, 10 × 2 × 10 and 2 × 10 × 10 unit cells large. Only the TiO6 octahedra are displayed. (d) A 2D slice through the 50 × 50 × 50 supercell along [001]pc direction illustrating the Na/Bi short range chemical order. For simplicity only the A-site cations are displayed: Na (red), Bi (blue), Ba (black) and K (green).

Another parameter that has been tested is the size of the in-phase domains, as can be seen in Fig. 6. For these simulations the antiphase/in-phase ratio was 30/70 and the initial size of the in-phase domains varied from 4 × 4 × 2, 6 × 6 × 2, 8 × 8 × 2 to 10 × 10 × 2 unit cells large. Similar with the previous simulations three in-phase domain variants were used for each different size i.e. 4 × 4 × 2, 4 × 2 × 4 and 2 × 4 × 4. The in-phase domains were randomly distributed and allowed to overlap. The initial size of the in-phase domains represents the minimum size of an isolated in-phase domain. A good match between experimental and calculated data was obtained for sizes higher than 4 × 4 × 2 unit cells. Since the in-phase domains were allowed to overlap, large domains (less than ~14 nm across) were created and this is in good agreement with the measured size from dark-field images (less than ~12 nm across). In Fig. 5c a small region of a 2D slice cut from a 50 × 50 × 50 supercell depicting the three in-phase variants (blue, green and magenta octahedra) randomly distributed in the antiphase tilted matrix (red octahedra) is shown. Due to the fact overlapping of domains is allowed, large in-phase domains are created. The high concentration of in-phase domains (70%) is indicated by the low numbers of antiphase tilted octahedra (red).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Simulated electron diffraction patterns in the reciprocal-space plane hk0.5 with different sizes of the in-phase domains. All patterns have been calculated from a 50 × 50 × 50 supercell with an antiphase/in-phase ratio of 30/70 but using different initial sizes for the in-phase domains: (a) 4 × 4 × 2 unit cells, (b) 6 × 6 × 2 unit cells, (c) 8 × 8 × 2 unit cells and (d) 10 × 10 × 2 unit cells. Electron diffraction patterns have been calculated using the kinematical approximation and by averaging the results from 20 different simulations, in order to reduce the anisotropic contribution to the diffraction intensities.

The last tested parameter was the shape of in-phase domains. By shape is meant that the short dimension of in-phase tilted domains was varied from 2 unit cells large up till 10 unit cells large (Supplementary Fig. S4). The short coherence length of in-phase tilting (~1 nm) seems to be crucial for obtaining a good match between experimental and simulated data. The diffuse scattering rods gradually transform into sharp ½(ooe) reflections with increasing the short dimension of in-phase tilted domains from 4 up till 10 unit cells large. Analyzing all simulations one can conclude that tetragonal platelets develop along the three equivalent pseudocubic directions and are randomly distributed within a rhombohedral matrix. Up till now this model only explains the diffuse scattering rods observed in hk0.5-slice of the RED data. To further check our model electron diffraction patterns were simulated along [001]pc, [011]pc and [111]pc zone axes (Supplementary Fig. S1(d–f)). When comparing to the experimental data a good agreement is obtained within the limits of the kinematical approximation. All superstructure reflections (½(ooe) and ½(ooo)) are accounted for with a model which has an antiphase/in-phase tilting ratio of 30/70 and in-phase tilted domains of 10 × 10 × 2 unit cells large. To this point the model explains two out of the three features observed experimentally, namely the diffuse scattering rods and superstructure reflections. In order to account for the broad diffuse intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections Na/Bi occupancy disorder and local cation displacements correlated along both <111>pc and <001>pc directions were included in the model. The degree of chemical short-range order (CSRO) is in fact very small but is significantly different from a random distribution. To obtain the CSRO a positive correlation of 0.1 was used in the <001>pc directions together with a negative correlation of −0.1 in the <111>pc directions. Ba and K atoms are randomly introduced in the structure which leads to a suppression of Na/Bi A-site CSRO. A 2D slice cut from the 50 × 50 × 50 supercell illustrating the Na/Bi occupancy disorder is shown in Fig. 5d. A small tendency of alternating rows with Na- and Bi-containing unit cells along <001>pc directions can be observed. Furthermore Bi-Bi distances along <111>pc and <001>pc directions have been increased by 1–2% while Na-Na distances have been decreased by 1–2%. Ba, K and Ti atoms were assumed to remain at their average positions. Figure 7 illustrates the simulated electron diffraction patterns in the hk0 and hk0.5 reciprocal-space planes calculated from the final model. Taking into consideration that the kinematical approximation was used for the simulations, a good match was obtained between the experimental patterns and the simulated ones as can be seen in Fig. 7(c–h). Both the morphology and intensity distribution (i.e. higher intensity at positions of ½(ooe) reflections) are accounted for by the model, in the case of the diffuse scattering rods present in hk0.5-slice. However, in the case of the broad diffuse scattering intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections (Fig. 7c,d), which is observed around the hk0 plane, the calculated diffuse scattering intensity (Fig. 7e,f) deviates slightly from the experimental one. This might be due to the fact that the broad diffuse intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections is affected more by dynamical effects and absorption. Moreover, the simulated patterns were calculated using the kinematical approximation and only one wavelength of 0.025 Å. In reality the electrons in the microscope present an energy spread (~0.9 eV) which was not taken into consideration and might affect the very weak diffuse scattering intensity.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Simulated electron diffraction patterns. (a) hk0 reciprocal-space plane. (b) hk0.5 reciprocal-space plane. (c), (d) Enlarged images of the regions depicted by white squares in the experimental hk0 pattern (Fig. 3b) compared with the corresponding calculated region (e), (f). (g) Enlarged image of the region depicted by the white square in the experimental hk0.5 pattern (Fig. 3c) compared with the corresponding calculated region (h). The diffraction patterns were calculated using the kinematical approximation from a 50 × 50 × 50 supercell with an antiphase/in-phase ratio of 30/70 and in-phase tilted domains of 10 × 10 × 2 unit cells large. A small degree of Na/Bi CSRO together with Na/Bi correlated displacements along <001>pc and <111>pc directions were also considered. The simulated electron diffraction patterns were obtained by averaging the results from 20 different simulations, in order to reduce the anisotropic contribution to the diffraction intensities.

The final model consists of three variants of in-phase domains tilted about the three pseudocubic axes randomly distributed into an antiphase tilted matrix (a a a ). In addition Na/Bi CSRO was introduced on the A-site together with correlated Na- and Bi-displacements along <111>pc and <001>pc directions. The two types of octahedral tilting are responsible for the two types of superstructure reflections while the plate-like shape of in-phase domains accounts for the diffuse scattering rods present in hk0.5-type slices. The broad diffuse intensity near the fundamental perovskite reflections can be explained by a small degree of CSRO on the A-site in combination with correlated Na- and Bi-displacements.

Discussion

So far, many structural investigations have reported local deviations from the long-range structure for NBT26,33 and NBT-based solid solutions2931 but the nature of these local deviations is still a matter of controversy. In this work a structural model of the local disorder in 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ceramic was developed by analyzing the intensity and morphology of Bragg reflections and diffuse scattering features in 3D. The RED method42,43 proved to be well suited for simultaneously recording sharp Bragg reflections and weak diffuse scattering intensity, uncovering new information in 3D. Three extra features besides the fundamental perovskite reflections were revealed by the RED data: (i) two types of superstructure reflections ½(ooe) and ½(ooo), (ii) broad diffuse scattering intensity around the fundamental perovskite reflections and (iii) continuous diffuse scattering rods present in hk0.5-type slices. The simultaneous analysis of intensity and morphology of both superstructure reflections and diffuse scattering intensity along different reciprocal-space planes facilitated the development of a complex structural model. The model we developed explains all observed features and consists of plate-like tetragonal domains (in-phase tilting) developed along the three equivalent pseudocubic directions which are randomly distributed within a rhombohedral matrix (antiphase tilting). In addition Na/Bi occupancy disorder on the A-site and correlated Na- and Bi-displacements along <111>pc and <001>pc directions have also been introduced in the final model. Our model suggests that the studied composition is situated on the tetragonal side of the MPB rather than the rhombohedral one with an approximate antiphase/in-phase tilt ratio of 30/70. The high concentration of in-phase tilted domains is in good agreement with the reported tetragonal average structure10. The size of the antiphase domains was less than ~10 nm across while for in-phase domains the size was less than ~14 nm across. Similar to other NBT-compounds54,55 the octahedral tilting for the studied composition is confined to the nanoscale which makes it difficult to assign a long-range octahedral tilt system. Several previous studies3234 have already reported the presence of nanosized tetragonal plate-like domains embedded in a rhombohedral matrix for pure NBT, but this is the first time when a comprehensive structural model is developed that explains all observed diffraction features. In the case of pure NBT these tetragonal plate-like domains are formed at high temperature and are associated with a residual tetragonal phase within the rhombohedral matrix. In our case the addition of Ba and K stabilizes the tetragonal domains which grow and are larger in size than the rhombohedral ones. Moreover the concentration of tetragonal domains is increased suggesting that the studied composition is closer to the tetragonal side of the MPB. On the other hand bond valence calculations14 showed that Bi3+ atoms are significantly underbonded while Na1+ atoms are slightly overbonded indicating a highly distorted local environment, especially for Bi3+ atoms. The requirement for Bi3+ to improve its coordination environment is the main drive for the local displacements along <111>pc and <001>pc directions. Similar behavior was also observed for Pb-based ferroelectrics in PZT and PMN60,61. CSRO on the A-site has also been reported for pure NBT and NBT-BT and was attributed to a tendency of reducing charge imbalance in the bulk structure26,29,31. The very small degree of Na/Bi chemical short range order might be the reason why it had eluded direct experimental evidence. Our model is also in good agreement with the GPZ-model26 for pure NBT which implies a low degree of A-site CRSO and correlated Na- and Bi-displacements along both <111>pc and <001>pc directions. Since the GPZs are planar defects which give rise to diffuse scattering rods in reciprocal-space they could be analogous to the plate-like in-phase domains from our model. The current study reveals the complexity of the local structure of 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ternary ceramic.

Methods

TEM characterization

The RED data and dark-field images were recorded at room temperature using a JEOL JEM-2100F microscope with ultra-high resolution pole-piece and Schottky-type field emission gun operated at 200 kV. For both experiments a Gatan Orius 200D CCD camera was used to record the electron diffraction patterns and dark-field images, respectively. The ceramics were prepared via conventional mixed oxide route. The detail was described in ref.10. TEM specimens were prepared via mechanical polishing till a thickness of about 30 μm, followed by Ar ion milling (Fishicone Model 1050).

RED method

An aperture with a diameter of 500 nm was used to select the region of interest during RED data collection. The data collection is semi-automated within the REDaquisition43 software. This method combines the mechanical tilt of the goniometer with a fine beam tilt which allows a very fine sampling of reciprocal-space. The goniometer tilting range was ±21° with a tilt step of 2° while the beam tilting range was ±1° with a beam tilt step of 0.1°. In total 440 electron diffraction frames were collected with 1.2 s acquisition time for each frame. Moreover, the collection of RED data does not require any alignment along exact zone axis patterns which means that diffuse scattering intensity is recorded in the presence of fewer Bragg reflections excited simultaneously. The reconstruction of 3D reciprocal-space volume was done using REDprocessing43 software while for the 3D visualization software Kitware VolView was used.

Simulations

The structural model for local disorder in 85NBT-10BKT-5BT ternary ceramic was developed using DISCUS47,48 software. In order to randomly distribute the origins of antiphase/in-phase domains an intrinsic function of the software was used, which returns Gaussian distributed pseudo random numbers with mean zero. To create chemical short-range order Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Within DISCUS software the occupancy of a site in the crystal is described using pseudo Ising spin variables: σi = +1 or σi = −1. If σi = +1 it means site i is occupied by atom A while if σi = −1 then site i is occupied by atom B. Using this variables the energy, E occ, takes the following form:

Eocc=iHσi+in,niJnσiσin 2

The sums are over all sites i and neighbors n in the supercell. The value σin refers to the occupancy (spin) of the neighboring site i-n of site i. J n are pair interaction energies corresponding to the neighboring vector defined by i and n. The quantity H is the energy of a single site and controls the overall concentration. If two neighboring sites are occupied by the same atom type the product σi·σin = 1 and if the energy term J n is positive alike pairs will lead to a larger energy and thus be avoided. On the contrary if J n is negative alike pairs will be favored. In the case of positive correlations two neighboring sites are occupied by the same atom type while a negative correlation will cause the two sites to be preferably occupied by different atom types. Na- and Bi-displacements were created also via Monte Carlo simulations using instead a Lennard‐Jones potential, as in the following equation:

Eij=in,niD[(τindin)122(τindin)6] 3

The sums are over all atom sites i in the supercell and all neighboring sites n. D represents the potential depth which must be negative, τin is the target distance where Lennard-Jones potential has its minimum and d in represents the user chosen distance between two neighboring atoms. The Monte Carlo algorithm is used to minimize the energy of a model system (i.e. our supercell) in order to create either CSRO or displacive disorder. The different energy terms for CSRO and displacive disorder are presented in equations (2) and (3), respectively. In the case of CSRO two different atoms are selected at random and their places are switched. In our case the constraints were a positive correlation of 0.1 in the <001>pc directions and a negative correlation of −0.1 in the <111>pc directions. For displacive disorder a randomly selected atom is shifted by a random amount along the user defined directions. In our case the displacements were limited to <111>pc and <001>pc directions. The energy difference of the configuration before and after a change is computed. The move is accepted if the energy difference is less than zero or if the probability P, given by eqn. (4), is less than a random number chosen uniformly in the range [0,1].

P=eΔEkT1+eΔEkT 4

where T is the temperature and k the Boltzmann’s constant. This process is repeated until the energy reaches a minimum.

Electronic supplementary material

Video 1 (11.8MB, mov)

Acknowledgements

The Knut and Alice Wallenberg (KAW) Foundation is acknowledged for funding for the electron microscopy facilities at Stockholm University and financial support for A.N. and C.W.T. under the project 3DEM- NATUR. We are grateful to Dr. S. H. Choy at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for providing the quality samples.

Author Contributions

C.W.T. conceived the idea of the study, designed the experiments, and supervised the project. A.N. designed and performed all experiments and computer simulations, and wrote the manuscript. Both authors contributed to data analysis and finalized the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-017-12801-w.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Alexandra Neagu, Email: alm.neagu@gmail.com.

Cheuk-Wai Tai, Email: cheuk-wai.tai@mmk.su.se.

References

  • 1.Shrout TR, Zhang SJ. Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics: Alternatives for PZT? J. Electroceram. 2007;19:113–126. doi: 10.1007/s10832-007-9047-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodel J, et al. Perspective on the development of lead-free piezoceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009;92:1153–1177. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03061.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Panda PK. Review: environmental friendly lead-free piezoelectric materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2009;44:5049–5062. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3643-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reichmann K, Feteira A, Li M. Bismuth sodium titanate based materials for piezoelectric actuators. Materials. 2015;8:8467–8495. doi: 10.3390/ma8125469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keeble DS, et al. Bifurcated polarization rotation in bismuth-based piezoelectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:185–190. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201201564. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takenaka T, Maruyama K, Sakata K. Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3 system for lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1. 1991;30:2236–2239. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.30.2236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parija B, Badapanda T, Panigrahi S, Sinha TP. Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of (1-x)(Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-xBaTiO3 ceramics. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Electron. 2013;24:402–410. doi: 10.1007/s10854-012-0764-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jo W, et al. On the phase identity and its thermal evolution of lead free (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-6 mol%BaTiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2011;110:074106. doi: 10.1063/1.3645054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nagata H, Yoshida M, Makiuchi Y, Takenaka T. Large piezoelectric constant and high Curie temperature of lead-free piezoelectric ceramic ternary system based on bismuth sodium titanate-bismuth potassium titanate-barium titanate near the morphotropic phase boundary. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1. 2003;42:7401–740. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.42.7401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang XX, Tang XG, Chan HLW. Electromechanical and ferroelectric properties of (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-(Bi1/2K1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004;85:91–93. doi: 10.1063/1.1767592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yan H, et al. Enhanced piezoelectric response and thermal stability in (1-x-y)(Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-y(K1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3 ternary ferroelectric single crystals. Scripta Mater. 2016;113:43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zvirgzds JA, Kapostins PP, Zvirgzde JV, Kruzina TV. X-ray study of phase-transitions in ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Ferroelectrics. 1982;40:75–77. doi: 10.1080/00150198208210600. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vakhrushev SB, et al. Phase-transitions and soft modes in sodium bismuth titanate. Ferroelectrics. 1985;63:153–160. doi: 10.1080/00150198508221396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jones GO, Thomas PA. Investigation of the structure and phase transitions in the novel A-site substituted distorted perovskite compound Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 2002;58:168–178. doi: 10.1107/S0108768101020845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Glazer AM. Classification of tilted octahedra in perovskites. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1972;28:3384. doi: 10.1107/S0567740872007976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gorfman S, Thomas PA. Evidence for a non-rhombohedral average structure in the lead-free piezoelectric material Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2010;43:1409–1414. doi: 10.1107/S002188981003342X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aksel E, et al. Monoclinic crystal structure of polycrystalline Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;98:152901. doi: 10.1063/1.3573826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rao BN, Fitch AN, Ranjan R. Ferroelectric-ferroelectric phase coexistence in Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. Phys. Rev. 2013;B 87:060102(R). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.060102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Beanland R, Thomas PA. Symmetry and defects in rhombohedral single-crystalline Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;89:174102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.174102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ma C, Guo H, Tan X. A new Phase boundary in (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3 revealed via a novel method of electron diffraction analysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:5261–5266. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201300640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hiruma Y, Nagata H, Takenaka T. Thermal depoling process and piezoelectric properties of bismuth sodium titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2009;105:084112. doi: 10.1063/1.3115409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aksel E, Forrester JS, Kowalski B, Jones JL, Thomas PA. Phase transition sequence in sodium bismuth titanate observed using high-resolution x-ray diffraction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;99:222901. doi: 10.1063/1.3664393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shuvaeva VA, et al. Local structure of the lead-free relaxor ferroelectric (KxNa1-x)0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;71:174114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.174114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rao BN, Olivi L, Sathe V, Ranjan R. Electric field and temperature dependence of the local structural disorder in the lead-free ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3: An EXAFS study. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:024106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.024106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Groszewicz PB, et al. Reconciling local structure disorder and the relaxor state in (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31739. doi: 10.1038/srep31739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kreisel J, et al. High-pressure x-ray scattering of oxides with a nanoscale local structure: Application to Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. Phys. Rev. B. 2003;68:014113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.014113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thomas PA, Trujillo S, Boudard M, Gorfman S, Kreisel J. Diffuse x-ray scattering in the lead-free piezoelectric crystals Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3 and Ba-doped Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. Solid State Sci. 2010;12:311–317. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gorfman S, Keeble DS, Bombardi A, Thomas PA. Topology and temperature dependence of the diffuse X-ray scattering in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 ferroelectric single crystals. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015;48:1543–1550. doi: 10.1107/S160057671501571X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daniels JE, Jo W, Roedel J, Rytz D, Donner W. Structural origins of relaxor behavior in a 0.96(Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-0.04BaTiO3 single crystal under electric field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;98:252904. doi: 10.1063/1.3602316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Daniels JE, Jo W, Donner W. High-energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction for in situ diffuse scattering studies of bulk single crystals. Jom. 2012;64:174–180. doi: 10.1007/s11837-011-0230-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ge W, et al. Direct evidence of correlations between relaxor behavior and polar nano-regions in relaxor ferroelectrics: A case study of lead-free piezoelectrics Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-x%BaTiO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103:241914. doi: 10.1063/1.4846655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dorcet V, Trolliard G, Boullay P. Reinvestigation of phase transitions in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 by TEM. Part I: First order rhombohedral to orthorhombic phase transition. Chem. Mater. 2008;20:5061–5073. doi: 10.1021/cm8004634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dorcet V, Trolliard G. A transmission electron microscopy study of the A-site disordered perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Acta Mater. 2008;56:1753–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Beanland R, Thomas PA. Imaging planar tetragonal sheets in rhombohedral Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 using transmission electron microscopy. Scripta Mater. 2011;65:440–443. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Levin I, Reaney IM. Nano- and mesoscale structure of Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3: A TEM perspective. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012;22:3445–3452. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aksel E, et al. Local atomic structure deviation from average structure of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3: Combined x-ray and neutron total scattering study. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87:104113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.104113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burton BP, Cockayne E. Prediction of the [Na1/2Bi1/2]TiO3 ground state. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2001;582:82–90. doi: 10.1063/1.1399692. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meyer K-C, Groeting M, Albe K. Octahedral tilt transitions in the relaxor ferroelectric Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. J. Solid State Chem. 2015;227:117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.03.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Groeting M, Kornev I, Dkhil B, Albe K. Pressure-induced phase transitions and structure of chemically ordered nanoregions in the lead-free relaxor ferroelectric Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;86:134118. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.134118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Groeting M, Hayn S, Albe K. Chemical order and local structure of the lead-free relaxor ferroelectric Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3. J. Solid State Chem. 2011;184:2041–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.05.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lu H, Wang S, Wang X. The electronic properties and lattice dynamics of (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3: From cubic to tetragonal and rhombohedral phases. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;115:124107. doi: 10.1063/1.4869733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang D, Oleynikov P, Hovmoller S, Zou X. Collecting 3D electron diffraction data by the rotation method. Z. Kristallogr. 2010;225:94–102. doi: 10.1524/zkri.2010.1202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wan W, Sun J, Su J, Hovmoller S, Zou X. Three-dimensional rotation electron diffraction: software RED for automated data collection and data processing. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2013;46:1863–1873. doi: 10.1107/S0021889813027714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Trelcat JF, et al. Morphotropic phase boundary in the BNT-BT-BKT system. Ceram. Int. 2012;38:2823–2827. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.11.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang SJ, Shrout TR, Nagata H, Hiruma Y, Takenaka T. Piezoelectric properties in (K0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-BaTiO3 lead-free ceramics. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Control. 2007;54:910–917. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2007.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Su J, et al. Structure analysis of zeolites by rotation electron diffraction (RED) Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014;187:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Proffen T, Neder RB. DISCUS: A program for diffuse scattering and defect-structure simulation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1997;30:171–175. doi: 10.1107/S002188989600934X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Neder, R. B. & Proffen, T. Diffuse Scattering and defect structure simulations: A cook book using the program discus. (Oxford University Press, 2008).
  • 49.Liu Y, Withers RL. Rigid unit modes (RUMs) of distortion, local crystal chemistry and the inherent displacive flexibility of microporous AlPO4-11. J. Solid State Chem. 2003;172:431–437. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4596(03)00024-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Withers RL. Disorder, structured diffuse scattering and the transmission electron microscope. Z. Kristallogr. 2005;220:1027–1034. doi: 10.1524/zkri.2005.220.12_2005.1027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baba-Kishi KZ, Welberry TR, Withers RL. An electron diffraction and Monte Carlo simulation study of diffuse scattering in Pb(Zr,Ti)O3. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008;41:930–938. doi: 10.1107/S0021889808026253. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yao JJ, et al. Role of coexisting tetragonal regions in the rhombohedral phase of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-xat.%BaTiO3 crystals on enhanced piezoelectric properties on approaching the morphotropic phase boundary. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012;100:012901. doi: 10.1063/1.3673832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ma C, Tan X. In situ transmission electron microscopy study on the phase transitions in lead-free (1-x)(Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011;94:4040–4044. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04670.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tai CW, Lereah Y. Nanoscale oxygen octahedral tilting in 0.90(Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-0.05(Bi1/2K1/2)TiO3-0.05BaTiO3 lead-free perovskite piezoelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009;95:062901. doi: 10.1063/1.3193544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tai CW, Choy SH, Chan HLW. Ferroelectric domain morphology evolution and octahedral tilting in lead-free (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-(Bi1/2K1/2)TiO3-(Bi1/2Li1/2)TiO3-BaTiO3 ceramics at different temperatures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008;91:3335–3341. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02592.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Welberry TR, Goossens DJ. Interpretation of diffuse scattering in the high-Tc superconductor HgBa2CuO4+δ. IUCRJ. 2016;3:309–318. doi: 10.1107/S2052252516010629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Welberry TR, Goossens DJ. Diffuse scattering and partial disorder in complex structures. IUCRKJ. 2014;1:550–562. doi: 10.1107/S205225251402065X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peng LM, Ren G, Dudarev SL, Whelan MJ. Robust parameterization of elastic and absorptive electron atomic scattering factors. Acta Crystallogr, Sect. A. 1996;52:257–276. doi: 10.1107/S0108767395014371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Woodward DI, Reaney IM. Electron diffraction of tilted perovskites. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 2005;61:387–399. doi: 10.1107/S0108768105015521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Noheda B. Structure and high-piezoelectricity in lead oxide solid solutions. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2002;6:27–34. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00015-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dkhil B, et al. Local and long range polar order in the relaxor-ferroelectric compounds PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3 and PbMg0.3Nb0.6Ti0.1O3. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;65:024104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.024104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video 1 (11.8MB, mov)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES