Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of propranolol on the regression of hemangiomas. Propranolol-treated hemangioma tissues were collected and the expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) was examined. We also established HIF-1α overexpression and knockdown hemangioma cells, and determined the effects of HIF-1α on the hemangioma cells proliferation, apoptosis, migration and tube formation. Significantly increased HIF-1α level was found in the hemangioma tissues compared to that in normal vascular tissues, whereas propranolol treatment decreased the HIF-1α level in hemangioma tissues in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Moreover, propranolol treatment significantly decreased cell proliferation, migration and tube formation as well as promoted cell apoptosis in HIF-1α overexpression and knockdown hemangioma cells. Propranolol suppressed the cells proliferation, migration and tube formation of hemangioma cells through HIF-1α dependent mechanisms. HIF-1α could serve as a novel target in the treatment of hemangiomas.
Keywords: Propranolol, Hemangiomas, Hypoxia inducible factor-1α, Knockdown, Regression
Introduction
Infantile hemangioma (IH), one of the most common vascular tumors in infants, is composed of disorganized blood vessels and immature endothelial cells (ECs) (1,2). The prevalence of IH is about 5–10% and it occurs more frequently in female, premature, and low-birth-weight newborns (3,4). Clinicopathologically, IH is a unique category of benign tumors, characterized by abnormal ECs proliferation without a regular vascular architecture during the first year of life, and spontaneous regression of the neovasculature in early childhood. Most IH have a simple course and a general watchful waiting policy is often recommended (5). However, 10% of IHs may grow dramatically, destroy tissue, and impair function, resulting in long-term cutaneous residua, permanent disfigurement, and even danger to life (6). Hence, it is necessary to clarify the relevant mechanism for IH and develop rational therapeutic strategies.
In clinical practice, corticosteroids have been considered the first-line medical management for aggressive IH with local or systemic complications (7). However, the recent advent of propranolol for treatment of severe cases (8) following the unexpected discovery of its effects on hemangioma regression has led to its subsequent popularization of this drug as first-line treatment (9,10). Although some possible explanations for propranolol’s regression have been proposed, there is still no evidence to support this conclusion in hemangiomas. Despite the remarkable effects of propranolol on hemangiomas regression, little is known about its mechanism.
In this study, we collected tissue samples from IH patients and isolated the hemangioma cells for investigating the mechanism of propranolol on the regression of hemangiomas.
Material and Methods
Sample collection
From March 2015 to February 2016, 10 IH patients in the present study were recruited for this study and were orally treated with propranolol (Tianjin Lisheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Patients had received no surgery or drug treatments prior to the propranolol treatment. Before and after the propranolol treatment, hemangioma tissues were collected from the patients. The vascular tissues from surgical operations were used as normal control. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University and the written informed consents were provided by family members.
Isolation of hemangioma cells
According to a previous description, hemangioma cells were isolated from patient tissues (11). Cells were cultured under standard conditions in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.25% fungizone (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 1% gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were passaged up to a maximum of five times before use in experiments.
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturers' instruction. cDNA was synthesized using the first-strand synthesis and qPCR kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT-qPCR detection was performed using SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). RT-qPCR conditions were an initial 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 70°C for 30 s. PCR products were subsequently analyzed by a melting curve analysis. Human β-actin mRNA was used as the internal control to normalize the HIF-1α expression and the ΔΔCt method was used to analyze the data as described previously (12).
Western blotting
Cells and tissue samples were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors cocktail, followed by high-speed centrifugation at 16,000 g at 4oC for 30 min and protein quantification using a bicinchoninic acid assay. The proteins were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and the separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, Millipore, USA) membranes. After blocking, the membranes were immunostained with anti-HIF-1α monoclonal primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) overnight, and then the membranes were incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature. The protein bands were developed with SuperSignal Ultra Chemiluminescent Substrate (USA). GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) was used as the loading control.
Cell treatment
Hemangioma cells were treated with concentrations of propranolol (0, 5, 50, and 200 μM) for 48 h or treated with 50 μM propranolol for different time courses (24, 48, and 72 h). To overexpress or knockdown HIF-1α protein, hemangioma cells were infected with lentivirus particles overexpressing or with knockdown HIF-1α plasmids (Hanbio, China) for 48 h according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Cell proliferation
Hemangioma cells (1×104 cells) were seeded onto 96-well plates and cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS until they reached 80% confluence. Thereafter, the cells were infected with lentivirus particles overexpressing or with knockdown HIF-1α plasmids with or without propranolol treatment. After 48 h, cellular proliferation was evaluated by CCK-8 kit (Dojindo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions using a microplate reader (Biotek ELX-800, USA) to measure the absorbance.
Cell apoptosis
Hemangioma cells (1×105 cells) were trypsinized and seeded into 6-well plates in 2 ml of culture medium for attachment. The cells infected with lentivirus particles for 48 h were trypsinized, collected, washed and then stained with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI; BD Bioscience, USA) for 10 min at 4°C in dark according to a standard protocol. Apoptotic cells were determined by flow cytometry analysis (Becton-Dickinson FACScan, BD Biosciences, USA).
Transwell migration assay
Hemangioma cells migration assay was determined by transwell system. Briefly, resuspended hemangioma cells (2×105 cells) were seeded onto the upper chamber of the insert (BD Biosciences, 8-µm pore size) coated with matrigel (BD Biosciences), and the lower chamber was filled with α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS. After maintaining in a cell culture incubator for 12 h the membranes of the upper chamber were stained by crystal violet and 3 random fields (200× magnification) of each membrane were picked for cell counting. All treatments were performed in triplicates.
Tube formation assay
In vitro tube formation assay was performed for assessing the neovascularization capacity. Thawed matrigel (BD Biosciences) was plated onto 96-well plates at 37°C for up to 1 h to form a reconstituted basement membrane. Trypsinized hemangioma cells were harvested and resuspended (1×104 cells/100 µL medium), seeded into matrigel, then incubated at 37°C for 6 h. Tube structures were inspected under an inverted light microscope (200× magnification). The images were quantified using the Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software from Media Cybernetics (USA), as previously described (13). The quantified values are reported as the fold of control.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v18 (USA). Data are reported as means±SD. The Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance was used to determine differences among groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Results
Increased expression of HIF-1α in hemangioma tissues
Significantly increased levels of HIF-1α mRNA and protein were found in hemangioma tissues compared with normal vascular tissues. However, HIF-1α mRNA and protein levels remarkably decreased in the propranolol-treated hemangiomas (Figure 1A and B).
Propranolol treatment decreased the expression of HIF-1α protein in a dose- and time-dependent manner
The treatment with gradient concentrations of propranolol (0, 5, 50, and 200 μM) showed that it gradually decreased the expression of HIF-1α protein in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A). Next, 50 μM propranolol used to treat the hemangioma cells for 24, 48, and 72 h showed that the propranolol gradually decreased the expression of HIF-1α level in a time-dependent manner (Figure 2B).
Overexpression of HIF-1α abolished the inhibitory effects of propranolol on hemangioma cells proliferation
To further validate the role of HIF-1α in the propranolol-treated cells, we established HIF-1α overexpressed and knockdown hemangioma cells. The results showed that cell proliferation was significantly inhibited by propranolol treatment of hemangiomas and significantly increased by HIF-1α overexpression, whereas propranolol treatment completely abolished HIF-1α overexpression-induced hemangioma cells proliferation (Figure 3A). Differently, HIF-1α knockdown remarkably inhibited hemangioma cells proliferation (Figure 3B).
Propranolol treatment promoted hemangioma cell apoptosis
As shown in Figure 4, the cell apoptotic percentage in propranolol treatment accounted for 17.9% (9.2+8.7%), almost 2-fold than control group (8.4%, 4.1+4.3%), suggesting that propranolol treatment induced hemangioma cell apoptosis. On the other hand, the cell apoptotic percentage accounted for 9.1% (3.9+5.2%) in HIF-1α overexpression group and 16.7% (8.2+8.5%) in HIF-1α knockdown group, suggesting that HIF-1α overexpression abrogated propranolol-induced hemangioma cells apoptosis.
Overexpression of HIF-1α abrogated the inhibitory effects of propranolol on hemangioma cells migration
The results showed that propranolol treatment decreased the number of migrated cells. Contrarily, HIF-1α overexpression significantly increased the cell migration and HIF-1α knockdown significantly decreased cell migration. Propranolol treatment completely abrogated the HIF-1α overexpression-increase in migrated cells (Figure 5A and B).
Overexpression of HIF-1α abrogated the inhibitory effects of propranolol on tube formation in hemangioma cells
The tube formation test results showed that propranolol treatment slightly decreased the level of tube formation. HIF-1α overexpression, on the other hand, significantly increased the level of tube formation and HIF-1α knockdown decreased the level of tube formation. Propranolol treatment completely abrogated the HIF-1α overexpression-increase in tube formation (Figure 6A and B).
Discussion
In the present study, we demonstrated that significantly increased HIF-1α levels were found in hemangioma tissues compared to normal vascular tissues, and its levels were decreased by propranolol treatment. The in vitro study demonstrated that propranolol treatment decreased the expression of HIF-1α protein in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Moreover, propranolol treatment significantly decreased hemangioma cell proliferation, migration and tube formation in HIF-1α-overexpressed and knockdown cells.
Traditionally, corticosteroids as well as other drugs such as interferon α and vincristine have been considered as first-line therapeutic approaches for the treatment of IH. However, multiple and serious side-effects that are very painful accompany these drugs. Recent evidence shows that propranolol effectively regressed IH in a patient with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Further evidence has shown that the use of propranolol in the treatment of IH can achieve satisfactory outcomes and no serious side-effects. Furthermore, propranolol may be effective in IH patients who are allergic to corticosteroids and interferon or in severe IH. It has been suggested that propranolol exerts its effects as a non-selective β-adrenergic receptor (AR) blocker that inhibits cell growth and induces cell apoptosis of the endothelial cells (14). Our results confirmed the cytotoxic effect of propranolol with an annexin V-FITC apoptosis assay, which demonstrated that high concentrations of propranolol resulted in increased apoptosis. However, the precise molecular mechanism of its action remains poorly understood.
Studies have shown that a causal relationship are observed between the expressions of β-AR and HIF-1α in pancreatic, breast and prostate cancer cells (15,16). Accumulation of HIF-1α was found to correlate with β-adrenergic agonists treatment, whereas norepinephrine-induced expressions of HIF-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are blocked by propranolol treatment. Besides HIF-1α, there are numbers of other VEGF regulators. Several other non-canonical pathways are not dependent on hypoxia and HIF-1α also regulate VEGF and angiogenesis (17,18). However, several studies have demonstrated that children with proliferative hemangiomas showed upregulation and stabilization of HIF-1α compared to normal controls (19–21), suggesting that these lesions may be intrinsically hypoxic, resulting in hemangioma endothelial cell proliferation through VEGF-mediated downstream signaling. This intrinsic difference in HIF-1α expression between hemangiomas and normal tissues could result in predominance of the canonical HIF-1α pathway in VEGF signaling. A reliance on HIF-1α signaling and dependence on VEGF (22) for survival could explain the specific response of hemangiomas rather than other tissues treated with propranolol.
In conclusion, significantly increased HIF-1α levels were found in the hemangioma tissues. Propranolol treatment inhibited cell proliferation, migration, tube formation and promoted apoptosis in the hemangioma cells, suggesting that HIF-1α could serve as a therapeutic target in the treatment of IH.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 8167080540) and Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2015HL012).
References
- 1.Bruckner AL, Frieden IJ. Hemangiomas of infancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:477–493. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.122. quiz 494-496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Drolet BA, Esterly NB, Frieden IJ. Hemangiomas in children. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:173–181. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907153410307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zou HX, Jia J, Zhang WF, Sun ZJ, Zhao YF. Propranolol inhibits endothelial progenitor cell homing: a possible treatment mechanism of infantile hemangioma. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2013;22:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2012.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Frieden IJ, Eichenfield LF, Esterly NB, Geronemus R, Mallory SB. Guidelines of care for hemangiomas of infancy. American Academy of Dermatology Guidelines/Outcomes Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:631–637. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70183-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga E, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC, Horii KA, et al. Prospective study of infantile hemangiomas: clinical characteristics predicting complications and treatment. Pediatrics. 2006;118:882–887. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lin RL, Schwartz RA. Hemangiomas of infancy - a clinical review. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2006;14:109–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gampper TJ, Morgan RF. Vascular anomalies: hemangiomas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:572–585. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00032. quiz 586; discussion 587-578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leaute-Labreze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taieb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2649–2651. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0708819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arneja JS, Pappas PN, Shwayder TA, Cullen ML, Becker CJ, Hamzavi FH, et al. Management of complicated facial hemangiomas with beta-blocker (propranolol) therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:889–895. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e5f8b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sans V, de la Roque ED, Berge J, Grenier N, Boralevi F, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, et al. Propranolol for severe infantile hemangiomas: follow-up report. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e423–e431. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li P, Xiao XE, Xu Q, Guo ZT. [Establishment of human infancy hemangioma-derived endothelial cell line XPTS-1 and animal model of human infancy hemangioma) Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011;46:129–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jing Z, Xu H, Chen X, Zhong Q, Huang J, Zhang Y, et al. The proton-sensing G-protein coupled receptor GPR4 promotes angiogenesis in head and neck cancer. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Storch CH, Hoeger PH. Propranolol for infantile haemangiomas: insights into the molecular mechanisms of action. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:269–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hu HT, Ma QY, Zhang D, Shen SG, Han L, Ma YD, et al. HIF-1alpha links beta-adrenoceptor agonists and pancreatic cancer cells under normoxic condition. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2010;31:102–110. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Park SY, Kang JH, Jeong KJ, Lee J, Han JW, Choi WS, et al. Norepinephrine induces VEGF expression and angiogenesis by a hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha protein-dependent mechanism. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2306–2316. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hu YL, Tee MK, Goetzl EJ, Auersperg N, Mills GB, Ferrara N, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid induction of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human ovarian cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:762–768. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.10.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Arany Z, Foo SY, Ma Y, Ruas JL, Bommi-Reddy A, Girnun G, et al. HIF-independent regulation of VEGF and angiogenesis by the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1alpha. Nature. 2008;451:1008–1012. doi: 10.1038/nature06613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Comati A, Beck H, Halliday W, Snipes GJ, Plate KH, Acker T. Upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in leptomeningeal vascular malformations of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66:86–97. doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e31802d9011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang EI, Thangarajah H, Hamou C, Gurtner GC. Hypoxia, hormones, and endothelial progenitor cells in hemangioma. Lymphat Res Biol. 2007;5:237–243. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2007.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kelly BD, Hackett SF, Hirota K, Oshima Y, Cai Z, Berg-Dixon S, et al. Cell type-specific regulation of angiogenic growth factor gene expression and induction of angiogenesis in nonischemic tissue by a constitutively active form of hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Circ Res. 2003;93:1074–1081. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000102937.50486.1B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boye E, Olsen BR. Signaling mechanisms in infantile hemangioma. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16:202–208. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32832a07ff. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]