Abstract
Rationale:
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma with pelvic involvement is a rare entity. Diagnosis and treatment for such an uncommon disease are challenging. Here we report a special case of classic Hodgkin lymphoma in pelvis.
Patient Concerns:
A 20-year-old woman was admitted to our department due to left hip symptoms. The patient reported a history of drenching night sweats, low-grade fever, pruritic rash on the body, and an almost 15% weight loss during the previous 3 months.
Diagnoses:
Imaging studies revealed osteolytic destruction of the left hemi-pelvic with a huge soft-tissue mass. Open biopsy established the pathological diagnosis of classic Hodgkin lymphoma.
Interventions:
Considering the B symptom, bulky disease, and high risk of pathological fracture of the patient, we performed limb-salvage surgery and 6 cycles ABVD chemotherapy with 2 cycles before surgery.
Outcomes:
Up to now, at the 3-year follow-up, there is no sign of disease relapse and metastasis. Besides, her limb function recovered well.
Lessons:
Based on this case and literature we reviewed, diagnoses for primary bone Hodgkin lymphoma should be cautious. For the treatment, chemotherapy was the main treatment option. Classic Hodgkin lymphoma patients seldom received tumor resection surgery, but for the special bone classic Hodgkin lymphoma individual with a huge tumor volume and high risk of pathological fracture in our study, limb-salvage surgery based on ABVD chemotherapy provided a satisfying clinical outcome.
Keywords: ABVD chemotherapy, classic Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease, limb-salvage surgery, pelvis
1. Introduction
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a kind of lymphatic cancer that is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells. Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is one major type of HL and accounts for 95% of all HL cases.[1] In late stage HL, bone involvement has been found in 10% to 20% of cases with <2% of cases showing skeletal lesions as the initial presentation.[2–4] Primary bone lymphoma is referred to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) as WHO defined in 2013. However, primary bone HL actually exists and only very limited literatures reported no more than 30 cases of primary bone HL.[5–9] Discriminating solitary bone lesion in HL patients from “primary” to “secondary” is challenging as the diagnosis of primary bone HL should be made based on strict histological and clinical manifestation. Treatment strategies of such a rare entity depend on disease stage and prognostic factors. Primary solitary bone HL is considered as an early stage disease, but secondary bone involvement indicates that the disease has developed into an advanced stage. So, it is cautious to make a primary Hodgkin disease diagnosis when HL presents as a solitary bone lesion. Here we presented a CHL case with the subtype of nodular necrosis that initially presented as pelvic involvement. After the limb-salvage surgery and 6 cycles ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) chemotherapy, the patient got a satisfying clinical outcome to date. Meanwhile, we briefly reviewed the recent literatures about bony HL and discussed the diagnosis and current treatment options for such a rare case.
2. Case report
The patient provided informed consent for the publication of her clinical and radiological data. This study was approved by medical ethical committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
2.1. General information
A 20-year-old woman was admitted to our department with a chief complaint of 2 months of left hip pain. The patient reported a history of drenching night sweats, low-grade fever, pruritic rash on the body, and an almost 15% weight loss during the previous 3 months. Also, she found an enlarging mass in her left hip during the latest month. She did not report any previous surgical history. Physical examination suggested the compression of sciatic nerve. Standard blood test after admission showed that the WBC (white blood cell) count was 21.23 × 109 L−1 (normal 3.5–9.5 × 109 L−1) with the neutrophils rate of 84.3% (normal 40–75%) and lymphocyte rate of 11.2% (normal 20–50%), Hgb was 104 g/L (normal 115–150 g/L), platelet count was 491 × 109 L−1 (normal 125–350 × 109 L−1). Epstein-Barr virus test was negative. Bone marrow aspiration from other hospital revealed a hyperactive hyperplasia of karyocyte. Osteolytic erosion in the left hemipelvis (zone I-II-IV, defined by Enneking and Dunham)[10] was identified on pelvic x-ray. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) imaging showed a severe lytic lesion spreading from left ilium and acetabulum to sacroiliac joint and finally affecting part of the left sacrum (Fig. 1). Surprisingly, a huge soft-tissue mass almost 25.0 × 16.0 × 9.0 cm in size was found. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the mass had a slightly higher signal on T1-weighted spin-echo images compared with neighboring muscle groups and had a relatively long signal on T2-weighted spin-echo images in the left pelvis, zone I-II-IV (Fig. 2).
Figure 1.

CT scans of the patient. (A) Showing left pelvic acetabular involvement with a huge soft-tissue mass. (B) Showing sacroiliac joint and left sacrum was destructed. (C) Showing the lytic lesion spreading form left ilium to sacroiliac joint. (D) Showing severe lytic destruction lead to a high risk of pathologic fracture.
Figure 2.

MRI of the patient. (A) A huge soft-tissue mass with a slightly long T1 signal. (B) A huge soft-tissue mass with a relative long T2 signal. (C) Soft-tissue mass involving sacroiliac joint and left sacrum. (D) Showing the huge volume tumor had a relatively clear boundary but pushed the uterus to the opposite side.
To ascertain the histopathology of this lesion and give the guidance for formulating a therapeutic plan, an open biopsy was performed instead of core needle biopsy. The histopathology was consistent with a diagnosis of CHL. Enhanced CT of the neck, chest, and abdomen showed no evidence of involvement of the cervical, mediastinal, or retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Prognostic factors according to the adapted International Prognostic Score (IPS) were determined (Table 1). After discussing with hematologists and considering the patient's general condition, relative high IPS, high risk of pathologic fracture, and sciatic nerve compression symptoms, a treatment protocol of limb-salvage surgery using en bloc resection followed by modular hemipelvic prosthesis reconstruction and 6 cycles ABVD course chemotherapy (doxorubicin, 25 mg/m2, intravenous injection [iv] Day 1 and 15; bleomycin, 10,000 units/m2, iv Day 1 and 15; vinblastine, 6 mg/m2, iv Day 1 and 15; dacarbazine, 375 mg/m2, iv Day 1 and 15) with 2 cycles before surgery was performed for this patient.
Table 1.
IPS of this patient.

2.2. Surgical procedure
After 2 cycles ABVD chemotherapy in department of hematology, the limb-salvage surgery was performed until the patient got a relatively good condition. A standard iliofemoral approach was used, according to the classification of pelvic resections by Enneking and Dunham.[10] A lower abdominal aortic balloon occlusion was used during the resection procedure. Type I-II-IV left pelvic resection and total hip arthroplasty were performed to achieve clear margins. During the operation, a soft-tissue mass with a maximum volume of 26.0 × 16.5 × 9.0 cm was visualized. It was bounded by the rear of the sacrum, and extended down to the femoral head, with involvement of lumbar muscle, the gluteus medius, and part of the S1 nerve root. During the procedure, a modular hemipelvic replacement system (Chun Li Zheng Da Co. Beijing, China) was implanted to reconstruct the left hemipelvis (Fig. 3). Three enlarged lymph nodes in the left inguinal region were dissected for biopsy. Finally, the muscles and soft tissues were sutured into the femoral prosthesis stem and acetabulum with 2–0 nonabsorbable sutures (Ethibond∗ Excel, Polyester Suture, Green Braided, Johnson & Johnson, New Jersey) to complete the in situ restoration and functional reconstruction. The surgery lasted 4.5 hours and blood loss was approximately 1500 mL for the entire procedure.
Figure 3.

Patient's x-rays. (A) Preoperative plain film showing left hemipelvis: zone I-II-IV involvement. (B) Postoperative plain film showing that the prosthetic positioning is good, with no loosening, fracture, or dislocation.
2.3. Postoperative management
The final pathological diagnosis was CHL with a subtype of nodular sclerosis (Fig. 4). The lymph nodes showed no cancer involvement but were confirmed to have reactive hyperplasia. The patient recovered well and was discharged after 10 days with no postoperative complications. The patient was restricted to bed rest for the first 2 weeks after surgery but was to exercise with quadriceps relaxation and contraction before getting out of bed. She started to stand with a lumbar-pelvic-hip brace 2 weeks after surgery. Four weeks after surgery, she could walk with 2 crutches.
Figure 4.

Biopsy images. (A) HE × 50 showing sclerosis nodules divided by fibrous bundles. (B) HE × 200 showing R-S cells presenting with huge volume body, round or oval-shaped, thick nuclear membrane, and obvious nucleoli. (C) Immunohistochemical stains showing positivity for CD30. (D) Immunohistochemical stains showing positivity for CD15.
The patient commenced another 4 cycles of chemotherapy with ABVD 1 month after surgery. Patient follow-up visits occurred frequently over the first year, at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after discharge, and every 6 months thereafter. Imaging studies were focused on tumor recurrence and the stability of the prosthetic implant. By 6 months after surgery, the patient was capable of all activities of daily living needed for self-care. Up to now, 3 years after the treatment, there is no sign of cancer recurrence and metastasis. The patient had largely recuperated from the surgery with an ISOLS (International Society of Limb Salvage) score of 23.0. The prosthetic positioning is good, with no loosening, fracture, or dislocation (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.

Patient 3 y after surgery. (A) Postoperative plain film showing equal limb length with no loosening, fracture, or dislocation. (B, C) Showing the patient had a relatively satisfying limb function.
3. Discussion
HL typically involves the lymphatic systems at 1 or more sites. Bony involvement in HL occurs through hematogenous spread or direct spread from the contiguous involved lymph node. WHO 2013 classification of bone tumor defined the primary NHL of bone as a neoplasm composed of malignant lymphoid cells, producing 1 or more masses within bone, without any supraregional lymph-node involvement or other extranodal lesions.[11] After concluding the clinical and pathological characters of our case, the evidence supporting the diagnose of primary bone HL in our study are as follows: Bone involvement was the initial symptom and the CT showed lesion obviously spreading from ilium to sacral through sacroiliac joint, supporting the lesion coming from ilium. The typical necrosis nodular from the HE stain and the HRS cells in tumor demonstrated a typical immunohistochemical profile with CD30 and CD15 positive. Chest, neck, and abdomen radiological studies showed no involvement of lymph nodes in mediastinum, thoracic, and abdominal cavity. The lesion was predominant in bone with associated soft-tissue mass, without local positive adjacent lymph nodes, as the 3 enlarge lymph nodes in inguinal region were pathologically confirmed as reactive hyperplasia. No other extranodal lesions presented. But Dawson et al showed that primary extranodal HL should be diagnosed based on normal limits of the complete blood count and white cell differentiation.[12] This was supported by Yang et al who presented a primary bone HL with a normal level of the complete blood count and differentiation.[13] So, there are also 3 points that revealed a systemic disease of our case: first is the B symptom that the patient showed 3 months before being admitted to our hospital; Second, the high WBC count with relatively high neutrophils rate and low Hgb; lastly, the bone marrow aspiration revealed a hyperactive hyperplasia of karyocyte. Previous study showed stage IV included patients with multiple bone involvement without evidence of distant nodal or visceral disease.[14] However, the adjacent multifocal lesions like ours and nonadjacent multifocal lesions suggested different disease stage, as adjacent multifocal lesions mostly come from local invasion but distant multifocal lesions revealed a hematogenous spread or direct spread from the contiguous involved lymph node. So, further work should focus on more details of this disease's diagnosis standard. As our patient had B symptom and the sacroiliac joint destruction (revealed 2 bone sites involvement), a finally diagnosis of unfavorable stage IV bone CHL (Ann Arbor staging criteria) was made.
HRS cells of HL are almost 100% positive for CD30 and 85% positive for CD15 on immunohistochemical staining.[15] The differential diagnosis of CD30 positive neoplasms that show the similar clinical and pathologic features with CHL were primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and gray zone lymphoma. Hoeller et al found that BOB.1, CD79a, and cyclin E are applicable immunohistochemical markers that can help distinguishing CHL from PMBCL.[16] B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and CHL, was initially proposed in the 2008 WHO Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, which was afterward named gray zone lymphoma. There are mainly 2 type of gray zone lymphoma. One is similar to CHL in shape, but the immunophenotype of tumor cells was closer to DLBCL. Another was tumor morphology was similar to that of DLBCL, but immunophenotype of tumor cells was closer to CHL; CD30 and CD15 were diffuse positive whereas CD20 and PAX5 expression levels are down.[17,18]
It seems that primary bone HL most likely appears on spine or long bone, seldom occurs in pelvic (Table 2 ).[5,6,8,13,19–33] Nodular sclerosis CHL represents 70% of CHL in Europe and USA, and this figure in China is 32.6%.[34] Almost 54% of nodular sclerosis CHL cases present with a huge soft mass.[35] Fibrosis was another prominent feature in the nodular sclerosis case.[6] So, primary bone HL may be one differential diagnosis of osseous tumor which is with a fibrous stromal component. For example, the initial diagnosis of Hodgkin disease was malignant fibrous histiocytoma in a recent study.[36] The clinical manifestations and imaging are nonspecific with limitations to distinguish primary bone nodular sclerosis HL of pelvic involvement from other common primary pelvic sarcomas such as chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma sarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma[37–41] (Table 3). Although the image features are sometimes similar, clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment options have obvious difference between CHL and other pelvic primary sarcomas.[9,40,42–44]
Table 2.
Current bone HL cases reported in literatures.

Table 2 (Continued).
Current bone HL cases reported in literatures.

Table 3.
Clinic and imaging features of the primary pelvic sarcomas.

The IPS of our patient is 4, which indicates an unfavorable disease. IPS is the most widely accepted risk stratification model that can help to determine the clinical treatment as well as predict prognosis for stage III-IV cases.[45] It utilizes 7 adverse prognostic factors and each of these factors can decrease the survival rate by 7% to 8%.[45] According to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience, IPS ≥4 was a significant independent predictor of worse overall survival and progression-free survival for extensive or advanced HL.[46] The patient in our study received a total of 6 cycles ABVD chemotherapy. The NCCN (2016) guidance for stage III-IV CHL patients revealed that ABVD or Stanford V for selected patients with IPS <3, or escalated-dose BEACOPP in selected patients <60 years with an IPS ≥4 are included as options for primary treatment for patients with stage III-IV disease.[46–49] Patients with 1 or multiple bone lesions usually respond well to combined-modality treatment, including chemotherapy and local radiotherapy. Up to now, 2 largest series patients with primary bone lymphoma studies demonstrated that patients with primary bone lymphoma treated with combined-modality versus single-modality therapy were found to have a superior outcome, with a significantly better survival.[50,51] Ding et al evaluated the antitumor activity of bortezomib in combination with IGEV (ifosfamide, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and prednisone) chemotherapy in a young male with primary bone HL who achieved low response after ABVD and ECHOP chemotherapy. Complete response was achieved after 2 cycles. This event suggested that bortezomib in the therapy of young patient suffering from primary bone HL maybe effective and safe.[52] For many HL patients who relapse following a response to initial chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard care.[53] In addition, small target drugs therapy showed promising outcome for relapsed HL cases in recent years. CD30 is expressed on the HRS cell and antibodies like brentuximab vedotin targeting this molecule have shown activity in vitro.[54,55] Recently reported clinical trials have shown that blocking interactions between the cell surface receptor programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 results in very high clinical-response rates.[56] Other agents with promising activity for this patients group include histone deacetylase inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and immunomodulatory agents.[57,58]
Surgery resection and limb-salvage reconstruction are seldom performed for such a hematologic malignancy. In most contexts, surgery was strictly used for biopsy, especially when needle biopsy was limited to get a significant outcome for some special sites such as pulmonary.[45] For bony HL, surgery was necessary for the treatment of actual or possible pathological fractures or spine cord and nerve comprehension.[52,59,60] Limb-salvage surgery in some special individuals got a satisfying clinical outcome. In a large series study, Khodamorad and colleagues suggested that combined-modality therapy for stage IE primary bone lymphoma resulted in good survival rate. In case of local recurrence, wide excision and limb-salvage reconstruction improved the clinical outcomes.[61] Alper et al reported in a young male diagnosed with primary bone lymphoma located in distal femur, distal femoral resection prosthesis was performed to prevent the risk of fracture and the patient was in remission and continued to attend school.[60] From the CT scan of our patient, we can see that the ilium, acetabular, and sacroiliac joint are severe destructed making the patient meet high risk of pathologic fracture. Furthermore, the patient showed a sciatic nerve comprehension symptom which was confirmed during surgery procedure. To sum up, as pelvic-ring is the central part of weight-bearing of our body and no other organs showing diseases involvement, tumor resection following limb-salvage reconstruction can get good local tumor control as well as preserve limb function to the greatest extent for our special individual.
The limb function of the patient recovered well so that she can take care of herself, study, and do some special works at 3-year follow-up. There are some key tips for such an extensive surgery to improve surgery success rate and limb function. First, the application of lower abdominal aortic balloon occlusion technique can effectively reduce an average blood loss of 1500 mL for pelvic sarcoma surgery, which typically shortens operative time to only 4 hours.[62] Second, “no touch” resection of the tumor, with a surgical margin of normal tissue at least 1.0 cm wide from the tumor pseudocapsule are recommended to reduce risks of seeding of cancer cells into the circulation. Third, muscle and soft tissue in situ reconstruction was mainly designed to achieve sufficient soft tissue coverage and functional recuperation after the hemipelvic prosthetic reconstruction. Moreover, we adopted LARS (ligament advanced reinforcement system, R06 × 400/s, France) to reconstruct the hip capsule and supply the point of attachment for muscles and soft tissues during reconstruction in recent years. Fourth, functional exercise and the time to early ambulatory activity should be based on the extent of resection, the hip stability after reconstruction with the hemipelvic prostheses, and the reconstruction of the periacetabular muscles.[63] The application of limb brace can reduce dislocation risk and help the patient for function exercise after surgery.[64]
4. Conclusion
CHL initially presenting as pelvic involvement with such a huge tumor volume is indeed rare. The diagnosis of primary bone HL should be made by strict histological and clinical manifestation. Chemotherapy is still the main treatment option for bony HL patient. Limb-salvage surgical resection is required only when bony HL patient meets a high risk of pathological fracture like our case. Overall, limb-salvage surgery combining 6 cycles ABVD chemotherapy got a promising 3-year clinical outcome in our study for such a late stage unfavorable patient. Mastering the surgery indication and fully assessing different therapy options risk is necessary for such a challenging case.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CHL = classic Hodgkin lymphoma, CT = computed tomography, HL = Hodgkin lymphoma, HRS = Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg, IPS = International Prognostic Score, ISOLS = International Society of Limb Salvage, iv = intravenous injection, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, NCCN = National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma, PD-1 = programmed death 1, WBC = white blood cell.
We wish to acknowledge funding in support of Li Min by the New Teacher Fund of the Ministry of Education in China (No.20120181120028). Fan Tang is supported by a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (Award number 201606240118).
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
- [1].Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th ed. vol. 22013. World Health Organization; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Guermazi A, Brice P, de Kerviler EE, et al. Extranodal Hodgkin disease: spectrum of disease. RadioGraphics 2001;21:161–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Zucca E. Extranodal lymphoma: a reappraisal. Ann Oncol 2008;19(suppl 4):iv77–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Ma J, Wang Y, Zhao H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 26 patients with primary extranodal Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014;7:5045–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Binesh F, Mirjalili MR, Akhavan A, et al. Primary bony Hodgkin's lymphoma. BMJ Case Rep 2012;2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Ostrowski ML, Inwards CY, Strickler JG, et al. Osseous Hodgkin disease. Cancer 1999;85:1166–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Gandhi JS, Mehta A, Sharma A, et al. Primary Hodgkin lymphoma of the ileum. J Cancer Res Ther 2010;6:342–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ha-ou-nou FZ, Benjilali L, Essaadouni L. Sacral pain as the initial symptom in primary Hodgkin's lymphoma of bone. J Cancer Res Ther 2013;9:511–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Biswas A, Puri T, Goyal S, et al. Osseous Hodgkin's lymphoma-review of literature and report of an unusual case presenting as a large ulcerofungating sternal mass. Bone 2008;43:636–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1978;60:731–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, et al. WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, 4th ed. vol. 52013. World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [12].Dawson IM, Cornes JS, Morson BC. Primary malignant lymphoid tumours of the intestinal tract. Report of 37 cases with a study of factors influencing prognosis. Br J Surg 1961;49:80–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Li Y, Wang XB, Tian XY, et al. Unusual primary osseous Hodgkin lymphoma in rib with associated soft tissue mass: a case report and review of literature. Diagn Pathol 2012;7:64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Matikas A, Briasoulis A, Tzannou I, et al. Primary bone lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of 22 patients treated in a single tertiary center. Acta Haematol 2013;130:291–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Nam-Cha SH, Montes-Moreno S, Salcedo MT, et al. Lymphocyte-rich classical Hodgkin's lymphoma: distinctive tumor and microenvironment markers. Mod Pathol 2009;22:1006–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Hoeller S, Zihler D, Zlobec I, et al. BOB.1, CD79a and cyclin E are the most appropriate markers to discriminate classical Hodgkin's lymphoma from primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Histopathology 2010;56:217–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Rentas Torres Y, Rodriguez-Lopez JL, Valentin M, et al. Difficult diagnosis between B cell lymphoma and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico 2015;107:98–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Evens AM, Kanakry JA, Sehn LH, et al. Gray zone lymphoma with features intermediate between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: characteristics, outcomes, and prognostication among a large multicenter cohort. Am J Hematol 2015;90:778–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Spencer J, Dresser R. Lymphoblastoma (Hodgkin's and sarcoma type) of bone. N Engl J Med 1936;214:877–9. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Kooreman PJ, Haex AJC. Hodgkin's disease of the skeleton. Acta Med Scand 1943;115:177–96. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Gold RH, Mirra JM. Case report 101. Primary Hodgkin disease of humerus. Skeletal Radiol 1979;4:233–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Chan KW, Rosen G, Miller DR, et al. Hodgkin's diseases in adolescents presenting as a primary bone lesion. A report of four cases and review of literature. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1982;4:11–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].MacCormick R, Covert A, Gross M. Primary bony involvement in Hodgkin's disease. Can Med Assoc J [Journal de l’Association medicale canadienne] 1989;140:1059–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Cowie F, Benghiat A, Holgate C. Primary Hodgkin's disease of bone. Clin Oncol 1991;3:233–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Fried G, Ben Arieh Y, Haim N, et al. Primary Hodgkin's disease of the bone. Med Pediatr Oncol 1995;24:204–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Citow JS, Rini B, Wollmann R, et al. Isolated, primary extranodal Hodgkin's disease of the spine: case report. Neurosurgery 2001;49:453–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Nguyen BD, Roarke MC. Multicentric primary spinal Hodgkin's lymphoma: PET/CT and MR imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2005;30:702–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Gebert C, Hardes J, Ahrens H, et al. Primary multifocal osseous Hodgkin disease: a case report and review of the literature. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2005;131:163–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Langley CR, Garrett SJ, Urand J, et al. Primary multifocal osseous Hodgkin's lymphoma. World J Surg Oncol 2008;6:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Samadian M, Vahidi S, Khormaee F, et al. Isolated, primary spinal epidural Hodgkin's disease in a child. Pediatr Neurol 2009;40:480–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Nikolica G, Badnjar Z, Cadjenovic T, et al. Primary extra nodal Hodgkin disease: bone presentation. Pol J Radiol 2014;79:91–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Uehara M, Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, et al. Hodgkin's disease of the thoracic vertebrae. Spine J 2013;13:e59–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Luo W, Zhang F, Sun J, et al. Unusual primary osseous Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case report. Oncol Lett 2015;9:677–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Sun J, Yang Q, Lu Z, et al. Distribution of lymphoid neoplasms in China: analysis of 4,638 cases according to the World Health Organization classification. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;138:429–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Colby TV, Hoppe RT, Warnke RA. Hodgkin's disease: a clinicopathologic study of 659 cases. Cancer 1982;49:1848–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Ozdemirli M, Mankin HJ, Aisenberg AC, et al. Hodgkin's disease presenting as a solitary bone tumor. A report of four cases and review of the literature. Cancer 1996;77:79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Laitinen M, Parry M, Albergo JI, et al. Outcome of pelvic bone sarcomas in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Guder WK, Hardes J, Gosheger G, et al. Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and lower extremities. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 2015;86:993–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Rajiah P, Ilaslan H, Sundaram M. Imaging of sarcomas of pelvic bones. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2011;32:433–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Park SK, Lee IS, Cho KH, et al. Osteosarcoma of pelvic bones: imaging features. Clin Imaging 2017;41:59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Flores M, Caram A, Derrick E, et al. Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis with an atypical radiographic appearance: a mimicker of non-malignant etiologies. Cureus 2016;8:e787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:776–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Jawad MU, Haleem AA, Scully SP. Malignant sarcoma of the pelvic bones: treatment outcomes and prognostic factors vary by histopathology. Cancer 2011;117:1529–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Outani H, Hamada K, Imura Y, et al. Comparison of clinical and functional outcome between surgical treatment and carbon ion radiotherapy for pelvic chondrosarcoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2016;21:186–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Hasenclever D, Diehl V. A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1506–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Edwards-Bennett SM, Jacks LM, Moskowitz CH, et al. Stanford V program for locally extensive and advanced Hodgkin lymphoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Oncol 2010;21:574–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Engert A, Haverkamp H, Kobe C, et al. Reduced-intensity chemotherapy and PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD15 trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;379:1791–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Gordon LI, Hong F, Fisher RI, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ABVD versus Stanford V with or without radiation therapy in locally extensive and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: an intergroup study coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2496). J Clin Oncol 2013;31:684–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Duggan DB, Petroni GR, Johnson JL, et al. Randomized comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV hybrid for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease: report of an intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:607–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Beal K, Allen L, Yahalom J. Primary bone lymphoma: treatment results and prognostic factors with long-term follow-up of 82 patients. Cancer 2006;106:2652–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Tao R, Allen PK, Rodriguez A, et al. Benefit of consolidative radiation therapy for primary bone diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015;92:122–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Ding L, Wang HX, Xue M, et al. Bortezomib in combination with IGEV chemotherapy regimen for a primary refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma of bone. Leuk Res 2009;33:e170–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2016;91:434–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Younes A, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CD30-positive lymphomas. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1812–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Younes A, Gopal AK, Smith SE, et al. Results of a pivotal phase II study of brentuximab vedotin for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2183–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2015;372:311–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Younes A, Sureda A, Ben-Yehuda D, et al. Panobinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma after autologous stem-cell transplantation: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2197–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Meadows SA, Vega F, Kashishian A, et al. PI3Kdelta inhibitor, GS-1101 (CAL-101), attenuates pathway signalling, induces apoptosis, and overcomes signals from the microenvironment in cellular models of Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2012;119:1897–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Liu YC, Gau JP, Yu YB, et al. Prognostic factors and treatment efficacy in patients with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the bone: single institute experience over 11 years. Int Med 2014;53:95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Cirakli A, Elli M, Dabak N, et al. Evaluation of primary bone lymphoma and the importance of positron emission tomography. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48:371–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Jamshidi K, Jabalameli M, Hoseini MG, et al. Stage IE Primary Bone Lymphoma: Limb Salvage for Local Recurrence. Arch Bone Joint Surg 2015;3:39–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Luo Y, Duan H, Liu W, et al. Clinical evaluation for lower abdominal aorta balloon occluding in the pelvic and sacral tumor resection. J Surg Oncol 2013;108:148–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Guo W, Li D, Tang X, et al. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;461:180–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Zhou Y, Duan H, Liu Y, et al. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection and reconstruction with a modular hemipelvic prostheses. Int Orthop 2011;35:1839–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
