Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2017 Sep 29;7:429. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00429

Deciphering Babesia-Vector Interactions

Sandra Antunes 1, Catarina Rosa 2, Joana Couto 1, Joana Ferrolho 1, Ana Domingos 1,*
PMCID: PMC5627281  PMID: 29034218

Abstract

Understanding host-pathogen-tick interactions remains a vitally important issue that might be better understood by basic research focused on each of the dyad interplays. Pathogens gain access to either the vector or host during tick feeding when ticks are confronted with strong hemostatic, inflammatory and immune responses. A prominent example of this is the Babesia spp.—tick—vertebrate host relationship. Babesia spp. are intraerythrocytic apicomplexan organisms spread worldwide, with a complex life cycle. The presence of transovarial transmission in almost all the Babesia species is the main difference between their life cycle and that of other piroplasmida. With more than 100 species described so far, Babesia are the second most commonly found blood parasite of mammals after trypanosomes. The prevalence of Babesia spp. infection is increasing worldwide and is currently classified as an emerging zoonosis. Babesia microti and Babesia divergens are the most frequent etiological agents associated with human babesiosis in North America and Europe, respectively. Although the Babesia-tick system has been extensively researched, the currently available prophylactic and control methods are not efficient, and chemotherapeutic treatment is limited. Studying the molecular changes induced by the presence of Babesia in the vector will not only elucidate the strategies used by the protozoa to overcome mechanical and immune barriers, but will also contribute toward the discovery of important tick molecules that have a role in vector capacity. This review provides an overview of the identified molecules involved in Babesia-tick interactions, with an emphasis on the fundamentally important ones for pathogen acquisition and transmission.

Keywords: tick-pathogen interaction, Babesia spp., vector, babesiosis, tick-borne diseases

Introduction

Parasites from the genus Babesia are responsible for causing an emerging zoonotic disease called babesiosis. Transmission occurs mainly through the bite of a Babesia-infected tick and, less commonly, by blood transfusion (Leiby, 2006; Ord and Lobo, 2015).

At least four Ixodidae genus are recognized as Babesia vectors: Rhipicephalus, Ixodes, Haemaphysalis, and Hyalomma (Sonenshine and Michael Roe, 2014). This disease has a considerable impact on the health and economy of the livestock industry, mainly in tropical and subtropical climates, with Rhipicephalus microplus and Rhipicephalus annulatus the main vectors of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina, the etiological agents of bovine babesiosis (Bock et al., 2004). In small ruminants, infections can be caused by several Babesia species, such as B. ovis, transmitted to sheep usually by the tick R. bursa (Shayan et al., 2007; Ranjbar-Bahadori et al., 2012; Ferrolho et al., 2016). Dogs are susceptible of infection by B. canis vogeli and B. gibsoni, primarily transmitted by R. sanguineus (Solano-Gallego et al., 2016; Chao et al., 2017). Human babesiosis, caused largely by Babesia microti and Babesia divergens, is not acknowledged as a tropical neglected disease, but there is a growing concern globally regarding this emerging zoonosis (Ord and Lobo, 2015).

Despite the fact that Babesia infections tend to impair tick development, an adaptive tolerance to Babesia has been described in R. microplus suggesting a balance between tick defense mechanisms and tick-pathogen mutual interaction(s) (Cen-Aguilar et al., 1998; Chauvin et al., 2009; Florin-Christensen and Schnittger, 2009; Lack et al., 2012; Gou et al., 2013; de la Fuente et al., 2016).

The development of improved tick and tick-borne disease control measures are essential to overcome the lack of data regarding which tick molecules are important and how they may be suitable as study targets. Based on this, herein we will discuss the functional roles of several molecules involved during the infection of tick tissues by Babesia spp.

Tick midgut molecules with a role in Babesia acquisition

Once ingested Babesia-infected red-blood cells reach the tick midgut many parasites will be destroyed or degenerate, but a small number will evolve to gametocytes, essential for zygote fusion and penetration of the midgut peritrophic membrane (Sonenshine and Hynes, 2008; Chauvin et al., 2009; Maeda et al., 2017). Recently, it was proposed that during the Babesia spp. sexual phase, some specific proteins with known functional roles in recognition and adhesion are expressed, including glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored proteins that interact with specific targets in the epithelial cells (Bastos et al., 2013; Alzan et al., 2016).

In the R. microplus midgut, proteomic analysis has identified a mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion-selective channel (BmVDAC) polypeptide, also known as mitochondria porin that binds to B. bigemina sexual stage proteins (Mosqueda et al., 2004; Rodríguez-Hernández et al., 2012). VDAC was first described as located in the external mitochondrial membrane that regulates the flux of small molecules into the mitochondrial space membrane having a role in cell metabolism and apoptosis (Young et al., 2007). In mosquitoes, VDAC plays a role during Plasmodium sp. invasion of the midgut; likewise, the dissemination of B. burgdorferi through the tick midgut might be associated with the ability of VDAC to bind a tissue-type plasminogen activator (Coleman et al., 1997; Ghosh et al., 2011). Under Babesia invasion this protein was found over-represented in the R. microplus midgut (Rodríguez-Hernández et al., 2012).

The tick receptor of the outer surface protein A (TROSPA) was firstly identified in the I. scapularis midgut epithelium as a receptor for B. burgdorferi, suggesting it has the potential to control bacterial infections in ticks (Pal et al., 2004; Konnai et al., 2012; Urbanowicz et al., 2016). In R. annulatus, an orthologue of trospa gene was over-expressed during B. bigemina infection and gene knockdown significantly reduced B. bigemina infection levels by 70 and 83% in R. microplus and R. annulatus, respectively (Antunes et al., 2012). In addition, B. bigemina-infected cattle vaccinated with TROSPA revealed close to an 80% decrease in pathogen transmission to ticks (Merino et al., 2013). In R. annulatus, this receptor was found not only in the midgut, but also in the salivary glands (SGs) and ovaries (Antunes et al., 2014).

During protozoal invasion, the tick innate immune response leads to the rapid, synthesis of defensins and tick antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). These constitute an important humoral defense mechanism, which is also active against intracellular bacteria and fungi (Antunes et al., 2012; Hajdusek et al., 2013; Tonk et al., 2015). The midgut defensin-like protein, longicin, was first identified in the tick Haemaphysalis longicornis and has a role in Theileria equi proliferation (Tsuji et al., 2007). Merozoite in vitro cultures were inhibited in the presence of recombinant longicin while the inoculation of this protein led to a reduction of B. microti parasitaemia in infected mice. Also, longicin silencing led to an increase in B. gibsoni parasitaemia in several tick tissues, including midgut, ovaries and eggs. Accumulated data on the function of this protein indicate that longicin has a babesiacidal effect. Microplusin was the first fully characterized member of a family of cysteine-rich AMPs in R. microplus (Fogaça et al., 2004); in R. annulatus, was found over represented in response to B. bigemina infection (Antunes et al., 2012).

Other molecules present in the midgut that also protect the tick from pathogen invasion are the MD-2-related lipid-recognition (ML)-domain containing proteins related with lipid recognition (Rudenko et al., 2005), proteases and protease inhibitors (Sonenshine and Hynes, 2008; Kopacek et al., 2010; Antunes et al., 2012; Hajdusek et al., 2013). Longipain, a H. longicornis midgut cysteine protease, has shown similar effects to longicin. Recombinant longipain was also able to inhibit the proliferation of T. equi merozoites, and gene silencing resulted in an increase of protozoa in the midgut lumen, ovaries and hatched larvae (Tsuji et al., 2008). Also in H. longicornis, a leucine-rich repeat domain-containing protein (LRR) has been identified as over represented in all tick tissues, with the exception of the ovary, where it is constitutively expressed. In vitro, a specific recombinant LRR has demonstrated a growth inhibitory effect on B. gibsoni with similar or better results than traditional anti-babesial drugs (Maeda et al., 2015).

Tick Kunitz-type protease inhibitors may restrict pathogen infection, presumably via the inhibition of microbial proteinases (Sasaki and Tanaka, 2008; Antunes et al., 2012). This group of genes was upregulated in response to infection (Antunes et al., 2012; Heekin et al., 2013), but its influence in Babesia acquisition was only related to ovary infection (Rachinsky et al., 2007; Bastos et al., 2009).

Bm86 is a glycoprotein, recognized for the first time in R. microplus, and present in midgut cells, that is likely to be involved in the endocytosis of the blood ingested by ticks (Gough and Kemp, 1993; Bastos et al., 2010; Rodríguez-Mallon, 2016). Regardless of the efficiency of Bm86 against tick infestation, some studies aimed to evaluate the role of Bm86 in Babesia infection (Bastos et al., 2010; Rodríguez-Mallon et al., 2013). RNA interference (RNAi) studies carried out in R. microplus females showed that Bm86 silencing significantly reduced the number of ticks; by contrast, silencing did not affect the efficiency of transovarial transmission of B. bovis (Bastos et al., 2010). In a different study using Gavac®, a vaccine based on the Bm86 antigen, naïve nymphs that co-fed on immunized dogs presented lower levels of B. canis, (Rodríguez-Mallon et al., 2013). It is conceivable that the lysis of midgut cells inhibited the entry of zygotes and/or their posterior differentiation into motile ookinetes, compromising B. canis acquisition by the nymphs.

Subolesin, firstly identified in I. scapularis ticks as an orthologue of akirin in insects and vertebrates (Almazán et al., 2003; Galindo et al., 2009), is a highly conserved protein in eukaryotes, including many tick species (Moreno-Cid et al., 2013; Antunes et al., 2014), suggesting its potential as a candidate antigen for an anti-tick and tick-borne pathogen (TTBP) vaccine. Subolesin family proteins are transcriptional factors, regulating protein expression in cellular pathways involved in the response to pathogen infection (de la Fuente et al., 2013; Sultana et al., 2015). Subolesin silencing mediated by RNAi led to a lower B. bigemina infection in R. microplus (Merino et al., 2011) but, in contrast, in R. annulatus, silencing did not lead to a significant decrease in B. bigemina levels (Antunes et al., 2012). Vaccination using subolesin and a chimera containing subolesin protective epitopes (Q38) revealed an effect on B. bigemina transmission to feeding ticks (Merino et al., 2013). Subolesin expression and subolesin-mediated innate immunity varies according to the pathogen and tissue (Zivkovic et al., 2010), which explains the variation in the results. However, it seems that targeting subolesin by vaccination or its gene by RNAi would result in lower Babesia infection levels.

The tick midgut is one of the few major organs that defines vector competence since it is the first obstacle that several pathogens, including Babesia, have to cross. Still, our understanding of the interplay between an infective pathogen and the tick midgut continues to be poor and requires further studies to better define this important interaction.

Tick haemolymph and ovary molecules acting in Babesia dissemination

After the successful invasion of the midgut epithelium, Babesia zygotes go through meiosis and differentiate into motile ookinetes that go across the haemocoel, with the help of haemolymph; in the haemocoel, the parasite undergoes asexual reproduction, resulting in several sporokinetes spread for all tick organs throughout all tick life stages (transstadial transmission) (Schnittger et al., 2012).

When a tick experiences microbial invasion, for example from a protozoa like Babesia spp., the hemocytes increase their circulating number to destroy and control the invader, phagocytizing small particles and microbes (Inoue et al., 2001; Villar et al., 2015). Besides phagocytosis, other processes including nodulation and encapsulation, and molecules like AMPs, lysozymes, proteases, protease inhibitors, and lectins, that exist in the haemolymph act directly on the pathogen (Esteves et al., 2008; Kotsyfakis et al., 2015). B. bigemina exhibits motility when reaching the haemolymph and adheres to R. microplus haemocyte membranes (de Rezende et al., 2015), however there is no information about how Babesia spp. invasion is controlled at the haemolymph level.

In female ticks, effective infection of ovaries and the eggs allow transovarial transmission of almost all Babesia species, a distinctive characteristic of this genus (Homer et al., 2000; Chauvin et al., 2009) that can be interpreted as an adaptation to efficiently persist in the ecosystem (Chauvin et al., 2009). The first ovarian proteomic profile of R. microplus infected with B. bovis identified a small number of differentially represented proteins. Among these proteins were calreticulin, glutamine synthetase and a family of Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitors; whereas between the less represented proteins were a tick lysozyme and a group of small proteins that may belong to a family of AMPs (Rachinsky et al., 2007). Ovarian genes involved in the stress response, detoxification and immune responses were found potentially regulated by B. bovis infection (Heekin et al., 2013); many of these genes translate into proteases and protease inhibitors that participate in the ovarian immune response. A putative immunophilin (Imnp) and a putative Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor (Spi) genes were found to be up regulated when tick ovaries were infected (Rachinsky et al., 2007) and the Imnp knockdown revealed a significant increase of larval infection, suggesting that this molecule might control the protozoan invasion of tick ovaries, and subsequent larval progeny. Immunophilin proteins, also known as cyclophilins, are associated with multiple cellular processes, like protein folding, trafficking and defense mechanisms (Wang and Heitman, 2005), however their role(s) during Babesia infection is still unknown.

The H. longicornis vitellogenin receptor (VgR) has been associated with the transovarial transmission of B. gibsoni. VgR silencing results in the absence of B. gibsoni infection and development of abnormal eggs (Boldbaatar et al., 2008) confirming its influence on oogenesis acting on heme detoxification and egg maturation (Boldbaatar et al., 2010; Perner et al., 2016). These results may suggest that Babesia molecules have ligand-binding activity for tick VgR, consequently invading the developing oocyte (Boldbaatar et al., 2008).

Ovarian proteins can affect tick biology by decreasing oogenesis and embryogenesis, which reduce tick reproduction rates and TBP transmission by blocking transovarial transmission, making these molecules promising targets for vaccine development.

Tick salivary gland molecules that intervene in Babesia transmission

When Babesia kinetes reach the SGs they undergo a final step of multiplication to produce sporozoites, the vertebrate host-infective stage. SGs can be considered as the last barrier that parasites must overcome to complete their life cycle in the vector, facing similar obstacles to those of the midgut (Chauvin et al., 2009).

Different SGs transcriptomes, commonly referred to as sialomes, from soft and hard ticks have been published (Francischetti et al., 2008, 2011; Anatriello et al., 2010; Karim et al., 2011; Ribeiro et al., 2011; Garcia et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2015; de Castro et al., 2016), showing genes encoding AMPs, such as defensins, microplusin/hebraein, Kunitz domain-containing proteins, lipocalins, proteases and other molecules related to tick defense mechanisms. Despite their importance for transmission, reports describing the influence of SG molecules on Babesia infection are absent.

The sialome of the soft tick Ornithodoros parkeri contains a putative serum amyloid A protein, whose orthologue was also found in the I. scapularis genome. In vertebrates, this protein is involved in the acute phase of an inflammatory response (Francischetti et al., 2008; Antunes et al., 2012). Vertebrate serum amyloid A protein was found increased in cattle with more resistance to tick infections, suggesting its involvement in the stress response induced by tick infestations (Ferreira et al., 2004). The expression of a putative serum amyloid A gene was increased in response to B. bigemina infection in R. annulatus and gene knockdown resulted in a reduction of 66 and 86% of the infection levels, in R. microplus and R. annulatus, respectively (Antunes et al., 2012).

Calreticulin, has been identified in tick ovaries, midgut and SGs (Antunes et al., 2012, 2015). The role of this molecule in ticks is still not clear but some studies support its presence in the SGs and saliva is presumably related to a mechanism to avoid vertebrate host defense responses (Jaworski et al., 1995; Ferreira et al., 2004; Antunes et al., 2015) and may lack the anti-thrombotic and complement-inhibiting characteristics that suppress host defense actions (Kim et al., 2015). The gene encoding this protein was found to be over expressed in R. annulatus infected with B. bigemina. Calreticulin knockdown had a significant effect on pathogen infection in R. microplus, but not in R. annulatus ticks, affecting the body weight in both tick species (Antunes et al., 2012). According to this and to other reports, it is thought that calreticulin acts during blood feeding (Ferreira et al., 2002; Antunes et al., 2012) and may alter calcium metabolism during Babesia infection. Babesia sp. may need calcium ions to invade tick cells as shown for T. equi (previously classified as B. equi). A pilot immunization trial in cattle using recombinant calreticulin failed to reduce tick infestation, probably due to the low immunogenicity of the protein (Ferreira et al., 2002). More recently, serum with anti-calreticulin antibodies also failed to promote a significant decrease in B. bigemina infection in R. microplus (Antunes et al., 2015). In this study, calreticulin immunolocalization assays have shown that this molecule can be found in the tick midgut, ovaries and SGs, suggesting that it might have a role in Babesia infection in all these tissues.

Other molecules, such as TROSPA, already discussed, have been also identified in tick SGs, where it may function as a receptor for Babesia parasites. Tick SG proteins are of extreme importance during Babesia-vector-host interactions and it seems likely that more molecules will emerge as key players in these vector-parasite networks in the near future.

Figure 1, Table 1 summarizes the so far identified tick molecules networking with Babesia spp. showing their localization and suggested interaction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Diagram representing tick molecules implicated in Babesia spp. acquisition and transmission by the vector. When ticks feed on Babesia-infected animals, parasites within red blood cellsreach and penetrate the tick midgut peritrophic membrane to invade the epithelial cells (in the figure center). Once these cells are infected, transcriptional factors, such as subolesin, can regulate protein expression in several cellular pathways, facilitating Babesia infection. In the microvilli of the midgut cells, parasite zygotes will probably interact with a tick glycoprotein (Bm86) and a tick receptor of the outer surface protein A (TROSPA). Inside the epithelial cells, mitochondria porins (VDAC) can bind to Babesia kinete proteins promoting plasminogen activation in the cell surface, allowing their passage to the haemolymph. Once here, the haemocytes can phagocyte circulating parasites and the tick antimicrobial molecules such as, longicin, micropulsin, longipain, LRR-domain and Kunitz-type protease inhibitors are activated potentially reducing the infection in the vector. If the infectious parasites surpass these barriers of defense, they will be capable to spread across the tissues and invade ovaries (represented in the bottom of the figure) and SGs (represented in the top of the figure). In the ovary, the interaction of Babesia molecules with tick vitellogenin and TROSPA receptors may contribute for the occurrence of transovarial transmission; while in the SGs, Babesia interacts with TROSPA and calreticulin.

Table 1.

Tick molecules interfering with Babesia spp. infection.

Protein name Assigned function Proteins localization Described effect in Babesia spp. infection References
MD HL OV SG
Mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion-selective channel (BmVDAC) Cell metabolism and apoptosis regulation X Enhance acquisition Rodríguez-Hernández et al., 2012, 2015
Tick receptor of the outer surface protein A (TROSPA) Factor for tick gut colonization X X X Enhance acquisition Antunes et al., 2012; Merino et al., 2013; Urbanowicz et al., 2016
Longicin Defensin X Control acquisition and transovarial transmission Tsuji et al., 2007
Microplusin Antimicrobial peptide X Antunes et al., 2012
Longipain Cysteine protease X Tsuji et al., 2008
Leucine-rich repeat domain-containing proteins Component of the innate immune system X X X X Control infection Maeda et al., 2015
Kunitz-type protease inhibitors Blood coagulation X X Enhance transovarial transmission Rachinsky et al., 2007; Bastos et al., 2009; Antunes et al., 2012
Bm86 Blood coagulation and cell growth X X Enhance acquisition Bastos et al., 2010
Subolesin Transcriptional factor involved in the immune signaling pathways X Enhance acquisition Merino et al., 2011; de la Fuente et al., 2013
Immunophilin Protein folding, trafficking and defense X Control transovarial transmission Rachinsky et al., 2007; Wang and Heitman, 2005
Vitellogenin receptor (VgR) Vitellogenin uptake X Enhance transovarial transmission Boldbaatar et al., 2008, 2010
Serum amyloid A Response to inflammation X Enhance acquisition Antunes et al., 2012
Calreticulin Protein folding and signaling X X X Enhance acquisition. Antunes et al., 2012
Open in a new tab

MD, Midgut; HL, Haemolymph; OV, Ovaries; SG, Salivary Glands.

Conclusions

The major critical point for the development of vaccines is the identification of new targets. In this review, our objective was to gather relevant information about the tick molecules involved with Babesia parasite infections. During the last decade, several studies using “omics” and systems biology approaches have greatly improved our knowledge of the interactions taking place at the tick-pathogen interface. The Babesia-tick interactome is still neglected with scattered information, and only a few tick proteins have been shown to influence the acquisition, dissemination and transmission of the parasite. From this short list, subolesin, having a role in the tick innate immune response, stands out as a potential candidate antigen for a universal anti-vector vaccine. During Babesia infection, this molecule produced positive results, making it a candidate antigen for a transmission-blocking vaccine. Other proteins involved in Babesia acquisition, including the TROSPA receptor, are also promising candidates for a multi-antigenic vaccine. Some of these datasets were obtained through use of transcriptomic, proteomic, and systems biology approaches. These and future technologies will be fundamental to the improvement and development of new control strategies and more effective vaccines.

Author contributions

SA, JF, CR, and AD conducted the literature research and wrote the paper. SA and CR prepared the table and JC prepared the figure. All authors critically read and revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Sarah Bonnet for the valuable suggestions and comments to the present review and also Mark Gibson for the English revision. Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) for funds to GHTM–UID/Multi/04413/2013 and project PTDC/CVT-EPI/4339/2012.

References

  1. Almazán C., Kocan K. M., Bergman D. K., Garcia-Garcia J. C., Blouin E. F., de la Fuente J. (2003). Identification of protective antigens for the control of Ixodes scapularis infestations using cDNA expression library immunization. Vaccine 21, 1492–1501. 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00683-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alzan H. F., Lau A. O., Knowles D. P., Herndon D. R., Ueti M. W., Scoles G. A., et al. (2016). Expression of 6-Cys gene superfamily defines Babesia bovis sexual stage development within Rhipicephalus microplus. PLoS ONE 11:e0163791. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anatriello E., Ribeiro J. M. C., de Miranda-Santos I. K. F., Brandao L. G., Anderson J. M., Valenzuela J. G., et al. (2010). An insight into the sialotranscriptome of the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. BMC Genomics 11:450. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Antunes S., Galindo R. C., Almazan C., Rudenko N., Golovchenko M., Grubhoffer L., et al. (2012). Functional genomics studies of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus ticks in response to infection with the cattle protozoan parasite, Babesia bigemina. Int. J. Parasitol. 42, 187–195. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Antunes S., Merino O., Lerias J., Domingues N., Mosqueda J., de la Fuente J., et al. (2015). Artificial feeding of Rhipicephalus microplus female ticks with anti calreticulin serum do not influence tick and Babesia bigemina acquisition. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 6, 47–55. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Antunes S., Merino O., Mosqueda J., Moreno-Cid J. A., Bell-Sakyi L., Fragkoudis R., et al. (2014). Tick capillary feeding for the study of proteins involved in tick-pathogen interactions as potential antigens for the control of tick infestation and pathogen infection. Parasit. Vectors 7:42. 10.1186/1756-3305-7-42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bastos R. G., Suarez C. E., Laughery J. M., Johnson W. C., Ueti M. W., Knowles D. P. (2013). Differential expression of three members of the multidomain adhesion CCp family in Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis and Theileria equi. PLoS ONE 8:e67765. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bastos R. G., Ueti M. W., Guerrero F. D., Knowles D. P., Scoles G. A. (2009). Silencing of a putative immunophilin gene in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus increases the infection rate of Babesia bovis in larval progeny. Parasit. Vectors 2:57. 10.1186/1756-3305-2-57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bastos R. G., Ueti M. W., Knowles D. P., Scoles G. A. (2010). The Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Bm86 gene plays a critical role in the fitness of ticks fed on cattle during acute Babesia bovis infection. Parasit. Vectors 3:111. 10.1186/1756-3305-3-111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bock R., Jackson L., De Vos A., Jorgensen W. (2004). Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 129, S247–S269. 10.1017/S0031182004005190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boldbaatar D., Battsetseg B., Matsuo T., Hatta T., Umemiya-Shirafuji R., Xuan X., et al. (2008). Tick vitellogenin receptor reveals critical role in oocyte development and transovarial transmission of Babesia parasite. Biochem. Cell Biol. 86, 331–344. 10.1139/O08-071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boldbaatar D., Umemiya-Shirafuji R., Liao M., Tanaka T., Xuan X. N., Fujisaki K. (2010). Multiple vitellogenins from the Haemaphysalis longicornis tick are crucial for ovarian development. J. Insect Physiol. 56, 1587–1598. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cen-Aguilar J. F., Rodriguez-Vivas R. I., Dominguez-Alpizar J. L., Wagner G. G. (1998). Studies on the effect of infection by Babesia sp. on oviposition of Boophilus microplus engorged females naturally infected in the Mexican tropics. Vet. Parasitol. 78, 253–257. 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00148-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chao L. L., Liao H. T., Ho T. Y., Shih C. M. (2017). First detection and molecular identification of Babesia gibsoni from Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks. Acta Trop. 166, 356–362. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chauvin A., Moreau E., Bonnet S., Plantard O., Malandrin L. (2009). Babesia and its hosts: adaptation to long-lasting interactions as a way to achieve efficient transmission. Vet. Res. 40:37. 10.1051/vetres/2009020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Coleman J. L., Gebbia J. A., Piesman J., Degen J. L., Bugge T. H., Benach J. L. (1997). Plasminogen is required for efficient dissemination of B. burgdorferi in ticks and for enhancement of spirochetemia in mice. Cell 89, 1111–1119. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80298-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Castro M. H., de Klerk D., Pienaar R., Latif A. A., Rees D. J. G., Mans B. J. (2016). De novo assembly and annotation of the salivary gland transcriptome of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus male and female ticks during blood feeding. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 7, 536–548. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de la Fuente J., Moreno-Cid J. A., Galindo R. C., Almazan C., Kocan K. M., Merino O., et al. (2013). Subolesin/Akirin vaccines for the control of arthropod vectors and vectorborne pathogens. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 60, 172–178. 10.1111/tbed.12146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de la Fuente J., Villar M., Cabezas-Cruz A., Estrada-Pena A., Ayllon N., Alberdi P. (2016). Tick-host-pathogen interactions: conflict and cooperation. PLoS Pathog. 12:e1005488. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Rezende J., Rangel C. P., McIntosh D., Silveira J. A., Cunha N. C., Ramos C. A., et al. (2015). In vitro cultivation and cryopreservation of Babesia bigemina sporokinetes in hemocytes of Rhipicephalus microplus. Vet. Parasitol. 212, 400–403. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Esteves E., Lara F. A., Lorenzini D. M., Costa G. H., Fukuzawa A. H., Pressinotti L. N., et al. (2008). Cellular and molecular characterization of an embryonic cell line (BME26) from the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 568–580. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferreira C. A. S., Vaz I. D., da Silva S. S., Haag K. L., Valenzuela J. G., Masuda A. (2002). Cloning and partial characterization of a Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) calreticulin. Exp. Parasitol. 101, 25–34. 10.1016/S0014-4894(02)00032-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferreira V., Molina M. C., Valck C., Rojas A., Aguilar L., Ramirez G., et al. (2004). Role of calreticulin from parasites in its interaction with vertebrate hosts. Mol. Immunol. 40, 1279–1291. 10.1016/j.molimm.2003.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferrolho J., Antunes S., Santos A. S., Velez R., Padre L., Cabezas-Cruz A., et al. (2016). Detection and phylogenetic characterization of Theileria spp. and Anaplasma marginale in Rhipicephalus bursa in Portugal. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 7, 443–438. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Florin-Christensen M., Schnittger L. (2009). Piroplasmids and ticks: a long-lasting intimate relationship. Front. Biosci. 14:3435. 10.2741/3435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fogaça A. C., Lorenzini D. M., Kaku L. M., Esteves E., Bulet P., Daffre S. (2004). Cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus: isolation, structural characterization and tissue expression profile. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 28, 191–200. 10.1016/j.dci.2003.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Francischetti I. M. B., Anderson J. M., Manoukis N., Pham V. M., Ribeiro J. M. C. (2011). An insight into the sialotranscriptome and proteome of the coarse bontlegged tick, Hyalomma marginatum rufipes. J. Proteomics 74, 2892–2908. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Francischetti I. M., Mans B. J., Meng Z., Gudderra N., Veenstra T. D., Pham V. M., et al. (2008). An insight into the sialome of the soft tick, Ornithodorus parkeri. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 1–21. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Galindo R. C., Doncel-Perez E., Zivkovic Z., Naranjo V., Gortazar C., Mangold A. J., et al. (2009). Tick subolesin is an ortholog of the akirins described in insects and vertebrates. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 33, 612–617. 10.1016/j.dci.2008.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Garcia G. R., Gardinassi L. G., Ribeiro J. M., Anatriello E., Ferreira B. R., Moreira H. N., et al. (2014). The sialotranscriptome of Amblyomma triste, Amblyomma parvum and Amblyomma cajennense ticks, uncovered by 454-based RNA-seq. Parasit. Vectors 7:430. 10.1186/1756-3305-7-430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ghosh A. K., Coppens I., Gårdsvoll H., Ploug M., Jacobs-Lorena M. (2011). Plasmodium ookinetes coopt mammalian plasminogen to invade the mosquito midgut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 17153–17158. 10.1073/pnas.1103657108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gou H., Guan G., Liu A., Ma M., Chen Z., Liu Z., et al. (2013). Coevolutionary analyses of the relationships between piroplasmids and their hard tick hosts. Ecol. Evol. 3, 2985–2993. 10.1002/ece3.685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gough J. M., Kemp D. H. (1993). Localization of a low abundance membrane protein (Bm86) on the gut cells of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus by immunogold labeling. J. Parasitol. 79, 900–907. 10.2307/3283728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hajdusek O., Sima R., Ayllon N., Jalovecka M., Perner J., de la Fuente J., et al. (2013). Interaction of the tick immune system with transmitted pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 3:26. 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Heekin A. M., Guerrero F. D., Bendele K. G., Saldivar L., Scoles G. A., Dowd S. E., et al. (2013). Gut transcriptome of replete adult female cattle ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, feeding upon a Babesia bovis-infected bovine host. Parasitol. Res. 112, 3075–3090. 10.1007/s00436-013-3482-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Homer M. J., Aguilar-Delfin I., Telford S. R., Krause P. J., Persing D. H. (2000). Babesiosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 451–469. 10.1128/CMR.13.3.451-469.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Inoue N., Hanada K., Tsuji N., Igarashi I., Nagasawa H., Mikami T., et al. (2001). Characterization of phagocytic hemocytes in Ornithodoros moubata (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 38, 514–519. 10.1603/0022-2585-38.4.514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jaworski D. C., Simmen F. A., Lamoreaux W., Coons L. B., Muller M. T., Needham G. R. (1995). A secreted calreticulin protein in ixodid tick (Amblyomma americanum) saliva. J. Insect Physiol. 41, 369–375. 10.1016/0022-1910(94)00107-R [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Karim S., Singh P., Ribeiro J. M. C. (2011). A Deep insight into the Sialotranscriptome of the gulf coast tick, Amblyomma maculatum. PLoS ONE 6:e28525. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim T. K., Guaratini Ibelli A. M., Mulenga A. (2015). Amblyomma americanum tick calreticulin binds C1q but does not inhibit activation of the classical complement cascade. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 6, 91–101. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Konnai S., Yamada S., Imamura S., Nishikado H., Githaka N., Ito T., et al. (2012). Identification of TROSPA homologue in Ixodes persulcatus Schulze, the specific vector for human Lyme borreliosis in Japan. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 3, 75–77. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kopacek P., Hajdusek O., Buresova V., Daffre S. (2010). Tick innate immunity. Invertebr. Immun. 708, 137–162. 10.1007/978-1-4419-8059-5_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kotsyfakis M., Kopácek P., Franta Z., Pedra J. H., Ribeiro J. M. (2015). Deep sequencing analysis of the Ixodes ricinus haemocytome. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9:e0003754 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lack J. B., Reichard M. V., Van Den Bussche R. A. (2012). Phylogeny and evolution of the Piroplasmida as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Int. J. Parasitol. 42, 353–363. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leiby D. A. (2006). Babesiosis and blood transfusion: flying under the radar. Vox Sang. 90, 157–165. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00740.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Maeda H., Hatta T., Alim M. A., Tsubokawa D., Mikami F., Kusakisako K., et al. (2017). Initial development of Babesia ovata in the tick midgut. Vet. Parasitol. 233, 39–42. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Maeda H., Kurisu K., Miyata T., Kusakisako K., Galay R. L., Rio T. M., et al. (2015). Identification of the Babesia-responsive leucine-rich repeat domain-containing protein from the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasitol. Res. 114, 1793–1802. 10.1007/s00436-015-4365-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Merino O., Almazan C., Canales M., Villar M., Moreno-Cid J. A., Galindo R. C., et al. (2011). Targeting the tick protective antigen subolesin reduces vector infestations and pathogen infection by Anaplasma marginale and Babesia bigemina. Vaccine 29, 8575–8579. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Merino O., Antunes S., Mosqueda J., Moreno-Cid J. A., Perez de la Lastra J. M., Rosario-Cruz R., et al. (2013). Vaccination with proteins involved in tick-pathogen interactions reduces vector infestations and pathogen infection. Vaccine 31, 5889–5896. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Moreno-Cid J. A., Perez de la Lastra J. M., Villar M., Jimenez M., Pinal R., Estrada-Pena A., et al. (2013). Control of multiple arthropod vector infestations with subolesin/akirin vaccines. Vaccine 31, 1187–1196. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mosqueda J., Falcon A., Antonio Alvarez J., Alberto Ramos J., Oropeza-Hernandez L. F., Figueroa J. V. (2004). Babesia bigemina sexual stages are induced in vitro and are specifically recognized by antibodies in the midgut of infected Boophilus microplus ticks. Int. J. Parasitol. 34, 1229–1236. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ord R. L., Lobo C. A. (2015). Human babesiosis: pathogens, prevalence, diagnosis and treatment. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2, 173–181. 10.1007/s40588-015-0025-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pal U., Li X., Wang T., Montgomery R. R., Ramamoorthi N., deSilva A. M., et al. (2004). TROSPA, an Ixodes scapularis receptor for Borrelia burgdorferi. Cell 119, 457–468. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Perner J., Sobotka R., Sima R., Konvickova J., Sojka D., Oliveira P. L., et al. (2016). Acquisition of exogenous haem is essential for tick reproduction. Elife 5:e12318. 10.7554/eLife.12318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rachinsky A., Guerrero F. D., Scoles G. A. (2007). Differential protein expression in ovaries of uninfected and Babesia-infected southern cattle ticks, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 37, 1291–1308. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ranjbar-Bahadori S., Eckert B., Omidian Z., Shirazi N. S., Shayan P. (2012). Babesia ovis as the main causative agent of sheep babesiosis in Iran. Parasitol. Res. 110, 1531–1536. 10.1007/s00436-011-2658-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ribeiro J. M., Anderson J. M., Manoukis N. C., Meng Z., Francischetti I. M. (2011). A further insight into the sialome of the tropical bont tick, Amblyomma variegatum. BMC Genomics 12:136. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Rodríguez-Hernández E., Mosqueda J., Alvarez-Sánchez M. E., Neri A. F., Mendoza-Hernández G., Camacho-Nuez M. (2012). The identification of a VDAC-like protein involved in the interaction of Babesia bigemina sexual stages with Rhipicephalus microplus midgut cells. Vet. Parasitol. 187, 538–541. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rodríguez-Hernández E., Mosqueda J., León-Ávila G., Castañeda-Ortiz E. J., Álvarez-Sánchez M. E., Camacho A. D., et al. (2015). BmVDAC upregulation in the midgut of Rhipicephalus microplus, during infection with Babesia bigemina. Vet. Parasitol. 212, 368–374. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rodríguez-Mallon A. (2016). Developing Anti-tick Vaccines. Methods Mol. Biol. 1404, 243–259. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3389-1_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rodríguez-Mallon A., Bechara G., Zacarias R., Benavides-Ortiz E., Soto-Rivas J., Gómez-Ramírez A., et al. (2013). Inhibition of Ehrlichia canis and Babesia canis transmission among ticks fed together on dogs vaccinated with Bm86 antigen. Open J. Anim. Sci. 3:24 10.4236/ojas.2013.33A004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rudenko N., Golovchenko M., Edwards M. J., Grubhoffer L. (2005). Differential expression of Ixodes ricinus tick genes induced by blood feeding or Borrelia burgdorferi infection. J. Med. Entomol. 42, 36–41. 10.1093/jmedent/42.1.36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sasaki S. D., Tanaka A. S. (2008). rBmTI-6, a Kunitz-BPTI domain protease inhibitor from the tick Boophilus microplus, its cloning, expression and biochemical characterization. Vet. Parasitol. 155, 133–141. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Schnittger L., Rodriguez A. E., Florin-Christensen M., Morrison D. A. (2012). Babesia: a world emerging. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12, 1788–1809. 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shayan P., Hooshmand E., Rahbari S., Nabian S. (2007). Determination of Rhipicephalus spp. as vectors for Babesia ovis in Iran. Parasitol. Res. 101, 1029–1033. 10.1007/s00436-007-0581-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Solano-Gallego L., Sainz Á., Roura X., Estrada-Peña A., Miró G. (2016). A review of canine babesiosis: the European perspective. Parasit. Vectors 9, 336. 10.1186/s13071-016-1596-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sonenshine D. E., Hynes W. L. (2008). Molecular characterization and related aspects of the innate immune response in ticks. Front. Biosci. 13:3209. 10.2741/3209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sonenshine D. E., Michael Roe R. (2014). Biology of Ticks, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sultana H., Patel U., Sonenshine D. E., Neelakanta G. (2015). Identification and comparative analysis of subolesin/akirin ortholog from Ornithodoros turicata ticks. Parasit. Vectors 8:132. 10.1186/s13071-015-0749-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tonk M., Cabezas-Cruz A., Valdés J. J., Rego R. O., Grubhoffer L., Estrada-Peña A., et al. (2015). Ixodes ricinus defensins attack distantly-related pathogens. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 53, 358–365. 10.1016/j.dci.2015.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tsuji N., Battsetseg B., Boldbaatar D., Miyoshi T., Xuan X., Oliver J. H., Jr., et al. (2007). Babesial vector tick defensin against Babesia sp. parasites. Infect. Immun. 75, 3633–3640. 10.1128/IAI.00256-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Tsuji N., Miyoshi T., Battsetseg B., Matsuo T., Xuan X., Fujisaki K. (2008). A cysteine protease is critical for Babesia spp. transmission in Haemaphysalis ticks. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000062. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Urbanowicz A., Lewandowski D., Szpotkowski K., Figlerowicz M. (2016). Tick receptor for outer surface protein A from Ixodes ricinus-the first intrinsically disordered protein involved in vector-microbe recognition. Sci. Rep. 6:25205. 10.1038/srep25205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Villar M., Ayllon N., Alberdi P., Moreno A., Moreno M., Tobes R., et al. (2015). Integrated metabolomics, transcriptomics and proteomics identifies metabolic pathways affected by Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection in tick cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 3154–3172. 10.1074/mcp.M115.051938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang P., Heitman J. (2005). The cyclophilins. Genome Biol. 6:226. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-7-226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Young M. J., Bay D. C., Hausner G., Court D. A. (2007). The evolutionary history of mitochondrial porins. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:31. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yu X., Gong H., Zhou Y., Zhang H., Cao J., Zhou J. (2015). Differential sialotranscriptomes of unfed and fed Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides, with particular regard to differentially expressed genes of cysteine proteases. Parasit. Vectors 8:597. 10.1186/s13071-015-1213-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Zivkovic Z., Torina A., Mitra R., Alongi A., Scimeca S., Kocan K. M., et al. (2010). Subolesin expression in response to pathogen infection in ticks. BMC Immunol. 11:7. 10.1186/1471-2172-11-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES