Skip to main content
Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences logoLink to Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
. 2010 Apr;10(Suppl 1):S44–S50. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2010.2648

RISK FACTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RENAL DISEASE AND DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY

Amra Mataradžija 1,*, Halima Resić 2, Senija Rašić 1, Nihad Kukavica 2, Fahrudin Masnić 2
PMCID: PMC5627713  PMID: 20433431

Abstract

Introduction:

Cardiovascular diseases are the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic renal disease. The aim of our paper is to evaluate the risk factors of cardiovascular complications in patients with various stages of chronic renal disease (CRD), with or without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Patients and methods:

The study included 98 patients with different stages of the CRD, with creatinine clearance <60 ml/min/1,73m2, and laboratory parameters monitored: homocysteine, BNP, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, HbA1c, Body Mass Index (BMI). First group comprised 49 patients with DM, age 50-82 years, M 28/F 21. Second group comprised 49 patients without DM, age 35-80 years, M 18/F 31. The IMT (intima media thickness) was measured by B-mode ultrasonography, and all patients had echocardiography examination done by 2D Doppler ultrasonography.

Results:

The IMT values in diabetic patients had statistically significant positive correlation with homocysteine values of r=0,9393, p<0,034, and cholesterol r=0,289, p<0,05, compared to non-diabetics. A significant negative correlation was found between the ejection fraction (EF) and BMI in both groups, more prominent in non-diabetics r=0,289, p<0,044 (diabetics r=0,162, p>0,05). 47,4% of diabetics had arteriosclerotic changes on carotid arteries, 8,5% had stenosis of ACC, and 22,0% had rhythm abnormalities on ECG. A positive correlation between IMT and BMI was found in diabetics, but was not statistically significant r=0,111, p>0,05. In the diabetics group a significantly higher (p<0,05) values of BNP, HbA1c, proteinuria, BMI, and cholesterol were found, and significantly lowered EF (p<0,0001).

Conclusion:

Risk factors for cardiovascular complications in patients with DM are various, and the most pronounced significance was found in the values of homocystein, BNP and cholesterol.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, cardiovascular complications

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the most significant complications of diabetes mellitus and also the most frequent cause of end-stage renal insufficiency. The number of patients who end up on an active haemodialysis treatment increased by 20% in the last 10 years. Cardiovascular complications, induced by accelerating arteriosclerosis, comprise almost 50% of all morbidity and mortality causes in diabetics, and patients with renal insufficiency caused by diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular complications (1). It is well-known fact that the traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease are: diabetes mellitus, anemia, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, azothemia, hyperlipidemia, obesity, smoking, physical inactivity, and non-traditional factors are: metabolic and hemodynamic disturbances. Combined impact of diabetes mellitus and a renal disorder increased the risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications and offer poorer prognosis for survival of these patients compared to general population. There are a number of hemodynamic and metabolic disorders in diabetic nephropathy, which disturb the structure and function of myocardium, and the progressive hypertrophy of the left ventricle (LVH) starts in the early stage of renal insufficiency with still normal secretory function. It starts with the lowering of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), combined with arterial hypertension and anemia, which mark the future LVH.

Aim

The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with various stages of renal disease, with or without diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised 98 patients with different stages of chronic renal disease (CRD) with creatinine clearance (Clc) < 60ml/min/1,73 m2. The first group consisted of 49 patients with diabetes (DM), mean age 64,20±9,39 years. There were 28 (57,1 %) males and 21 (42%) females. 28 (47,4%) patients received the insulin therapy. All patients received antidiabetic, antihypertensive, antilipemic, diuretic and cardio protector medication. The second group consisted of 49 non-diabetic patients, mean age 63,67±10,36 years. There were 18 (36,7%) males and 31 (42,9%) females. The causes of CRD were: Chronic pyelonephritis - 18 patients (36,7%), chronic glomerulonephritis - 10 patients (20,4%), polycystic kidney disease - 10 patients (20,4%), uric arthritis - 3 patients (6,1%), nephroangiosclerosis - 2 patients (4,1%), obstructive nephropathy - 2 patients (4,1%), Renal cancer - 2 patients (4,1%), kidney agenesis - 1 patient (2%), amyloidosis - 1 patient (2%). All patients received anti hypertension medication, antilipemics, antianemics, diuretics and cardio protectors. The standard laboratory methods, used by the central laboratory at the Clinical Center, were used: Hb, Hct, Fe, ferritin, urinary proteins, creatinine clearance, total cholesterol, HDLC, LDLC, triglycerides, blood glucose, HbA1c, homocysteine, BNP. The values of systolic and diastolic pressures were measured, and also ECG, heart ultrasound, and Doppler of carotid arteries were obtained. The following statistical methods were used in data processing: number, percentage, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, standard error, range, Chi-square test (χ2), ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) and Spear correlation coefficient (p<0,05).

RESULTS

It can be seen in table 1 and on chart 1, respectively, that in diabetics group there were 42,9% (21) of females and 57,1% (28) of males. Mean age was 64,2±9,39 years. Chart 2. shows that in the non-diabetic group there were significantly more females 63,3% (31) than males 36,7% (18). Mean age was 63,67±10,36 years.

TABLE 1.

Distribution of patients by sex

graphic file with name BJBMS-10-S44-g001.jpg

CHART 1.

CHART 1

Distribution of diabetic patients by sex

CHART 2.

CHART 2

Distribution of non-diabetics by sex

Chart 3 shows the distribution of causes of CRD in non-diabetic group: chronic pyelonephritis - 18 patients (36,7%), polycystic kidney disease - 20,4% (10 patients), chronic glomerulonephritis - 20,4% (10 patients), renal cancer - 4,1% (2 patients), obstructive nephropathy - 4,1% (2 patients), uric arthritis - 6,1% (3 patients), kidney agenesis - 2% (1 patient), amyloidosis - 2% (1 patient). nephroangiosclerosis - 4,1% (2 patients). Table 2 shows that diabetics have significantly higher values (p<0,001) of BMI, urinary proteins, blood glucose, HbA1c, BNP and IMT, and significantly lower values of EF. Mean value of homocysteine in the groups were also increased, but ranges between minimal and maximal values were much higher in diabetics group. Correlation between IMT and LDLC in diabetics is statistically significant R0=0,064; p<0,05. In non-diabetics there was no significant correlation. (Chart 4)

CHART 3.

CHART 3

Causes of the CRD in non-diabetics

TABLE 2.

Laboratory values by the groups

graphic file with name BJBMS-10-S44-g005.jpg

CHART 4.

CHART 4

Graphical presentation of correlation between IMT and LDLC by the groups

There is a positive, statistically significant correlation between IMT and BNP in diabetics R0=0,0303; p<0,034. There was no significant correlation in non-diabetics. (Chart 5)

CHART 5.

CHART 5

Graphical presentation of correlation between IMT and LDLC by the groups

There is negative statistical correlation between EF and BMI in both groups, more pronounced in non-diabetics R0=0,289; p<0,044, than in diabetics R0=0,162; p>0,05. (Chart 6)

CHART 6.

CHART 6

Correlation between EF and BMI by the groups

Table 3. shows that in the diabetic group there was more patients with hypertension 36,7% (18 patients), myocardiopathy 28,6% (14 patients), healed myocardial infarction 24,5% (12 patients), implanted electro stimulator 8,2% (4 patients), and rhythm disorders 22% (13 patients). Equal number of patients in both groups had angina pectoris 14,3% (7 patients) and performed aortic-coronary by-passes 18,4% (9 patients). Two patients from the second group (non-diabetics) had aortic aneurism surgery. Table 4. shows that in diabetic group there was a larger number of patients with atherosclerotic changes on carotid arteries 47,40% (28 patients), and ACC-ACI 40-70% stenosis had 8,5% (5 patients) diabetics. It can be seen in table 5 that the thickness of all measured ventricular walls in diastole LA, LV, posterior wall and the septum was significantly higher in diabetics, while the ejection fraction (EF) was lower. The LV mass index was significantly higher in the diabetics group.

TABLE 3.

Distribution of heart diseases in the two groups, diabetics and non-diabetics

graphic file with name BJBMS-10-S44-g009.jpg

TABLE 4.

Changes in Common Carotid Artery (ACC) by the groups

graphic file with name BJBMS-10-S44-g010.jpg

TABLE 5.

Mean values of ventricular walls and the septum thickness

graphic file with name BJBMS-10-S44-g011.jpg

DISCUSSION

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the most frequent complications of type 2 diabetes and in more than 60% of diabetics constitute the cause of death (1, 3, 7, 9). Our study shows that patients with diabetic nephropathy had more risk factors, both traditional and non-traditional, for the development of cardiovascular complications compared with non-diabetic patients. Increased body weight was more frequent in diabetics group, which is confirmed by significantly higher BMI values. The obesity is directly to blame for the occurrence of insulin resistance. The higher BMI further induces metabolic disturbances of lipids and blood glucose levels, which combined with hypertension, directly jeopardize the architecture and function of the heart muscle, and contribute to the development of arteriosclerosis (13, 14, 15). We have stressed that obesity and unregulated glycemia are directly reflected on lipid metabolism disorder, which further causes the development of arteriosclerosis and changes in peripheral and blood vessels of the heart. The diabetic group had higher mean values of HDLC cholesterol, while LDLC and total cholesterol were a bit higher in the non-diabetic group, which is consistent with the data from the literature (8, 18). Comparing the mean cholesterol values by the groups with carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), we have found statistically significant positive correlation between the IMT and LDLC cholesterol R0=0,289; p<0,05, in the diabetics group. Mean values of Hct and Fe in diabetics group were somewhat lower; a significant anemia syndrome has not been found in neither studied group, probably because a large number of patients were receiving substitution therapy of erythropoietin and iron supplements, as suggested in some studies (6). Metabolic disorders in diabetics associated with increased body weight induce not only systemic, but also glomerular hypertension (although there are accounts of hypertension as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular occurrence), which affect the occurrence of microalbuminuria, proteinuria, and also represents a significant cardiovascular risk (9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 21). We have found higher mean values of systolic and diastolic arterial pressures in the diabetics group, and significantly higher mean value of proteinuria, which other authors also suggest (1, 2, 21). Evaluation of cardiovascular risks in the studied groups was based on ECG and echocardiography findings. Risk factors inducing the development of future disorders in the heart are microangiopathies of coronary blood vessels, neuropathies of the heart nervous system, metabolic disorders and fatty degeneration of the myocardium (2, 7, 8). All of these changes occur as a consequence of high blood glucose and HbA1C levels in unregulated diabetes (1, 3, 7, 19). There were significantly higher mean values of blood glucose and HbA1C in our study, and a higher number of diabetics with left ventricular hypertrophy (22%) and heart rhythm abnormalities (1, 3). Also, a higher number of diabetics had implanted electro stimulator (8,2%), and higher number of patients had healed myocardial infarction (24,5%,), compared to non-diabetics. The number of patients with angina pectoris and performed aortic-coronary by-passes was equal in both groups. It is known that hyper-homocysteinemia, identified as a possible cause of cardiovascular disease, causes arteriosclerosis (12), and increased heart mass (13), and represents a significant risk factor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (13). We have found increased mean values of homocysteine in both groups, but the range between the lowest and the highest values was more significant in diabetics group (4). Significant arteriosclerotic changes were found in carotid arteries in 47,4% of patients, and 40-70% stenosis in one of the ACC in 8,5% of patients in diabetics group. As a newer marker that can be used for identification of cardiovascular complications is BNP (Brain Natriuretic Peptide), which is synthesized as a pre-pro BNP, mostly in myocardium of the ventricles, and whose value depends on heart contractility and load-pressure in the heart (overload). Increased serum values of the BNP is seen in patients with dysfunction of the left ventricle, correlates with the increase of pulmonary capillary pressure, with the increase in the end-diastolic pressure in the left ventricle, and ejection fraction in patients with systolic dysfunction (3, 5, 16, 17, 20, 21). A significantly higher value of BNP was found in patients with diabetic nephropathy. A significantly lower ejection fraction was found by echocardiography in diabetics group, and negative correlation between EF and BMI (R0=0,162; p<0,05). We also found a significantly higher LV mass index in diabetics group as a sign of hypertrophy of the left ventricle (20, 21).

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher values of BMI, urinary proteins, blood glucose, HbA1C, BNP and IMT were found in the diabetics compared to the non-diabetics group, and significantly lower values of ejection fraction (EF).

There is a significant positive correlation between IMT and BNP and IMT and LDLC in diabetics group, and negative correlation between EF and BMI.

A higher number of patients with increased systolic and diastolic pressures, healed myocardial infarction, rhythm abnormalities, implanted electro stimulators, and arteriosclerosis of the ACC were found in the diabetics group. Our study showed that metabolic disorders in diabetic nephropathy, caused by an uncontrolled increase of blood glucose and HbA1C and other laboratory parameters, led to more frequent cardiovascular complications in the diabetics group, and that the regulation of their values was of strategic significance in the treatment of nephropathy. The results of the study are to a large extent limited by the fact that the patients in both groups were treated by reference therapies respectively.

List of Abbreviations

IMT intima-media thickness

LDLC low density lipoprotein cholesterol

HDLC high density lipoprotein cholesterol

trig triglyceride

BNP Brain Natriuretic Peptide

EF ejection fraction

BMI body mass index

ACC-ACI common carotid arteryinternal carotid artery

CVD cardiovascular diseases

AMI acute myocardial infarction

BP - HTA blood pressure - arterial hypertension

LVH left ventricle hypertrophy

ECG electrocardiograph

Hb haemoglobine

Hct hematocrit

Fe iron

HbA1c haemoglobine A1c

GFR glomerular filtration rate

CRD chronic renal disease

DM diabetes mellitus

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ritz E. Diabetic nephropathy. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2006;17:481–490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schram M.T, Chaturvedi N, Schalkwijk C.G. Vascular risk factors and markers of endothelias function as determinants of inflammatory markers in type 1 diabetes - The EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Diab Care. 2003;26:2165–2173. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.7.2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ritz E. Heart and kidney: fatal twins. Am. J. Med. 2006;119(Sup-4 pl-1):S31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blacher J, Demuth K, Guerin A.P. Association between plasma homocystein Concentrations and cardiac hypertrophy in end-stage renal disease. J. Nephrol. 1998;12:248–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Benedetto F. Cardiac natriuric peptides are related to left ventricular mass and function and predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2001;12:1508–1515. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1271508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ritz E. Anemia and diabetic nephropathy. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2006;6:469–472. doi: 10.1007/s11892-006-0081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Howard B.V, Magee M.F. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2000;2:476–481. doi: 10.1007/s11883-000-0046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ritz E, Wanner C. Lipid changes and statins in chronic renal insufficiency. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17(Suppl 3):S226–230. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Levin A, Thompson C.R, Ethier J. Left ventricular mass index increase in early renal disease: impact of decline in hemoglobin. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1999;34:125–134. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marchais S.J, Guerin A.P, Pannier B. Wave reflection and cardiac hypertrophy in chronic uremia: role of arterial wave reflections. Hypertension. 1193;22:876–883. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.22.6.876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guerin A.P, Pannier B, Marchais S.J. Arterial remodeling and cardiovascular function in end-stage renal disease. Adv. Nephrol. 1998;27:105–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goodman W.G, Salusky I.B. Non-invasive assessments of cardiovascular disease in patients with renal failure. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2001;10:365–369. doi: 10.1097/00041552-200105000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Levin A, Djurdjev Q, Barrett B. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease: getting to the heart of the matter. Am. J. Kid. Dis. 2991;38:1398–1407. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.29275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vaga G.L. Obesity, the metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. Am. Heart J. 2001;142:1108–1116. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.119790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rewers M, Zaccaro D, D'Agostino R, et al. Insulin sensitivity insulinaemia, and coronary artery disease: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care. 2004:781–787. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrannini E, Natali A, Capaldo B, Lehtovirta M, Jacob S, YkiJarvinen H. Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and blood pressure: role of age and obesity. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistence (EGIR) Hypertension. 1997;30:1144–1149. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.30.5.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Akiba T, Tachibana 1С, Hiroe M, Marumo F. Plasma human brain natriuretic peptide in chronic renal failure. Clin. Nephrology. 1995;44(Suppl 1):S61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stratton I.M, Adler A.I, Neil HAW, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405–412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ishimura E, Shoji T, Emoto M, et al. Renal insufficiency accelerates arhero-sclerosis in patients with type 2 diabete mellitus. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003;38(suppl 1):S11–S17. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.27440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yamamota 1С, Burnett J, Jougasaki M, et al. Supriority of brain natriuretic peptide as a hormonal marker of ventricular systoic and diastolic dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension. 1996;28:988–994. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.28.6.988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mancia G, de Backer G, Dominiczak A. Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J. Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–1187. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281fc975a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

RESOURCES