Abstract
Background
Both Panax ginseng Meyer and Panax quinquefolius are obligate shade-loving plants whose natural habitats are broadleaved forests of Eastern Asia and North America. Panax species are easily damaged by photoinhibition when they are exposed to high temperatures or insufficient shade. In this study, a cytohistological study of the leaf structures of two of the most well-known Panax species was performed to better understand the physiological processes that limit photosynthesis.
Methods
Leaves of ginseng plants grown in soil and hydroponic culture were sectioned for analysis. Leaf structures of both Panax species were observed using a light microscope, scanning electron microscope, and transmission electron microscope.
Results
The mesostructure of both P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius frequently had one layer of noncylindrical palisade cells and three or four layers of spongy parenchymal cells. P. quinquefolius contained a similar number of stomata in the abaxial leaf surface but more tightly appressed enlarged grana stacks than P. ginseng contained. The adaxial surface of the epidermis in P. quinquefolius showed cuticle ridges with a pattern similar to that of P. ginseng.
Conclusion
The anatomical leaf structure of both P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius shows that they are typical shade-loving sciophytes. Slight differences in chloroplast structure suggests that the two different species can be authenticated using transmission electron microscopy images, and light-resistant cultivar breeding can be performed via controlling photosynthesis efficiency.
Keywords: cytohistological study, leaf, Panax ginseng, Panax quinquefolius, thylakoid
1. Introduction
Ginseng (genus Panax; “cure-all” in Latin) is one of the most important perennial medicinal plants that belong to the family Araliaceae, and it has been cultivated for its highly valued medicinal properties for > 2000 yrs in East Asian countries like China, Japan, and Korea [1], [2].
The chromosome number of Korean ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) and American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) has been reported to be 2n = 48 [3], [4], [5], and the plants are tetraploid (2n = 4x). Some Panax species such as Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F. H. Chen have half the number of chromosomes (2n = 24). P. ginseng has an estimated genome size of 3.12 Gbp per haploid chromosome equivalent [6], whereas P. quinquefolius has an estimated genome size of 4.91 Gbp [7]. P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius (the closest relative of P. ginseng that recently diverged in the Panax lineage) [8] have been cultivated in shaded areas of Eastern Asia and forest canopies of Eastern North America, respectively [9], [10]. However, information on the physiological differences between both ginseng species, especially cytohistological leaf structures that may affect photosynthetic activity, is not well characterized.
Ginseng plants prefer north- and east-facing sites on well-drained slopes under a forest canopy with 70–90% shade. In Asia, ginseng plants have been traditionally cultivated under an impermeable straw hatch. In Korea, production was found to be higher when P. ginseng plants were grown in an experimental plot shaded with straw hatch than with a polyethylene net [11]. Several studies have tried to develop better shading materials for growing ginseng in Korea [12], [13], China [14], North America, and Ontario, Canada [15]. A physiological process that might limit photosynthesis was shown to be the result of smaller quantum yield of oxygen evolution in intact leaves of ginseng than in that of pea and spinach [16]. In this study, to investigate the differences between P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius, several morphological characteristics such as surface structure of the cuticle layer, number of stomata, and appressed versus nonappressed thylakoids were observed.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant materials and growth conditions
Different-aged P. ginseng cultivars “Chunpoong”, “Gumpoong”, “Yunpoong”, and “K-1” and P. quinquefolius were kindly provided by the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science (NIHHS) of the Rural Development Administration (RDA), Eumsung, Korea. Leaf tissue for stomata number counting was obtained from 3-wk-old ginseng plantlets. In addition, the ginseng plants were hydroponically grown in perlite and peatmoss at 23 ± 2°C under white fluorescent light (60–100 μmol/m2/s) in a controlled greenhouse. Ginseng cultivars grown in soil and under a polyethylene fabric cloth were obtained from a ginseng field (Suwon, Korea).
2.2. Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy
For light microscopy, samples embedded in LR White resin (London Resin Co., London, UK) were thin-sectioned, stained with 0.1% toluidine blue, and examined using a light microscope (Zeiss, Axiolba, Germany). For scanning electron microscopy, the samples were fixed with a mixture of 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde and were postfixed in 50mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1% OsO4. After dehydrating the samples with a series of alcohols (30% for 40 min, 50% for 40 min, 70% for 40 min, 80% for 40 min, 90% for 40 min, and 100% for 40 min twice), the samples were dried with a HCP-2 critical point dryer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), coated with gold in an Emitec K550 ion sputter, and observed using a scanning electron microscope (S-2400; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
2.3. Transmission electron microscopy
Two-yr-old ginseng leaf tips were fixed with a mixture of 2% glutaraldehyde (v/v) and 2% paraformaldehyde (v/v) in 0.05M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) at room temperature for 4 h. The samples were washed using the same buffer and postfixed with 1% OsO4 in 0.05M cacodylate buffer at room temperature for 1 h. The fixed samples were washed with the buffer and then dehydrated in an ethanol series of 30–100%. The samples were embedded in LR White resin at 50°C for 24 h, and ultrathin sections (80–100 nm thick) were prepared using an ultramicrotome with a diamond knife. The thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and then examined using a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Original cultivation areas and characteristics of P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius
USA and Canada, ranging from the southern part of Canada (Ontario and British Columbia) to Central Alabama and from the east coast to the west of the Mississippi River, are the major producers of P. quinquefolius [17]. In Korea, major P. ginseng cultivars have been cultivated in Daejon and Chuncheon between the latitudes of 36°N and 38°N [13] (Fig. 1). A previous study showed that P. quinquefolius is more tolerant against greater light intensity than P. ginseng [18]. Because plants that grow at higher latitudes receive greater light intensity than plants that grow at lower latitudes [14], this feature of P. quinquefolius seems possible. Cytohistological leaf structures of P. quinquefolius from Ontario and several P. ginseng cultivars [19], [20], Yunpoong, Chunpoong, Gumpoong, and K-1, were analyzed. Yunpoong is a high-yielding cultivar [21] with two to three more proliferated axillary shoots than the other P. ginseng cultivars [19]. Yunpoong has a relatively short stem length and a higher number of flower buds and seeds per plant [19]. Chunpoong is one of the best-fit cultivars for producing red-ginseng materials, with the longest main root length and an appropriate root diameter [19] for forming a human body shape. The lower half of the stem of Chunpoong is typically purple, and it has more curled leaves and exhibits a higher percentage of leaf burning than Yunpoong [19]. Disease resistance, especially against root rust, is the hallmark of the cultivar Gumpoong [21]. K-1 was recently registered as a high saponin producer and a high-yielding cultivar [21]. For detailed cytohistological observations on each ginseng species, P. ginseng cultivars and P. quinquefolius were grown in Suwon, Korea, under the same environmental conditions, and the leaf tips were analyzed (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 1.
Major Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius cultivation areas located worldwide.
Fig. 2.
Surface structure of ginseng leaves. (A) Schematic diagram of 2-yr-old ginseng and leaf tips used for surface structure analysis (left). Diagram of 3-wk-old ginseng plantlet (right). Five-leaf structure is additionally emerged as per age with no morphological changing in other organs. (B) Scanning electron microscopy image showing the adaxial (upper) surface of a ginseng leaf with wavy anticlinal cuticle ridges. Bar, 20 μm (left) and 10 μm (right). (C) In a diameter (1.28 mm × 0.94 mm) of 3-wk-old ginseng leaves, the total number of stomata is similar among Panax quinquefolius and three Panax ginseng cultivars in 1st and 2nd leaves depicted in Fig. 2A (right). Eight randomly selected different diameter images were used to count. (D) Scanning electron microscopy image showing the abaxial (lower) surface of a ginseng leaf with wavy epidermis and similar numbers of stomata. Bar, 20 μm (left) and 10 μm (right).
3.2. Abaxial and adaxial leaf-surface structures
Both ginseng species showed similar adaxial leaf-surface structures (Fig. 2A, left), and they had the same patterns of cuticle ridges (Fig. 2B). Two different ginseng species also exhibited similar numbers of stomata located in the abaxial surface of the leaves grown under the same environmental conditions (Fig. 2C). In a given diameter (1.28 mm × 0.94 mm), 3-wk-old P. quinquefolius with other analyzed P. ginseng cultivars did not show any significant difference in stomata number (Figs. 2C and 2D). A previous study showed that the density of stomata in young snake tomato leaves increased to 28% and 58% compared to the semi-old and old leaves [22]. Evaluation whether ginseng leaf also show a decreased number of stomata with an increase in age needs to be analyzed in the near future. Sebastiania myrtilloides (Euphorbiaceae) is a good example of a plant that shows differential changes in leaf surface area between sunny and shady habitats; the number of stomata per leaf in the shady habitat was significantly lower than that in the sunny habitat [23]. The similar structure of abaxial and adaxial leaf in P. quinquefolius and P. ginseng cultivars suggests that both species are evolved for shady habitat.
3.3. Internal leaf structure with spherical palisade cells
The internal space in leaves is composed of mesophyll cells, which are further divided into adaxial (upper) palisade and abaxial (lower) spongy cells in many dicotyledonous plants [24]. The skeleton of ginseng leaf shows reticulate venation with an elongated large vein, the midvein, per leaf. The midvein along the median longitudinal axis of the leaf in shaded field-grown 3-yr-old P. ginseng cultivars and 4-yr-old P. quinquefolius shows similar structural features with vascular bundle sheath cells in the center and collenchyma cells on both sides (Fig. 3A). The leaves of the four selected P. ginseng cultivars and P. quinquefolius consisted of a layer of epidermis in the upper and lower sides; a layer of spherical palisade cells, which are distinct when compared with other sun-type plant species such as Capsicum annuum and Arabidopsis thaliana [25]; and two or three layers of spongy cells (Fig. 3A). The structural features were confirmed using hydroponically cultured 3-yr-old P. ginseng cultivars and P. quinquefolius (Fig. 3B); this suggests that ginseng species of different ages have similar morphological internal leaf structures. One interesting aspect to be considered in ginseng leaf structure is that spherical palisade cells, rather than cylindrical palisade cells, are oriented perpendicular to the leaf surface [25] Phototropins (PHOT1 and PHOT2) are blue-light receptors [26], [27]. PHOT2 mediates blue-light-dependent development of cylindrical palisade cells [25]. When phot2 is mutated, spherical palisade cells, as observed in the ginseng leaves (Fig. 3), are formed. When plants are grown under high-light conditions, leaves develop palisade tissues in which cylindrical cells are perpendicularly aligned to the epidermis to maximize the efficiency of photosynthesis [28], [29], [30]. Further characterization of blue-light receptors in ginseng is required, especially to understand how ginseng species have evolved to adapt to the environment as shade-loving plants.
Fig. 3.
Internal leaf structures of ginseng. (A) Midvein, leaf (circled uppermost part of leaf from Fig. 2A), adaxial and abaxial side of the midvein, and vascular bundle structure of soil-grown Panax ginseng cultivars and Panax quinquefolius observed using light microscopy. Bar, 5 μm (uppermost row) and 20 μm. (B) Mesostructures of ginseng leaves from 3-yr-old hydroponically cultured ginseng species. Bar, 50 μm.
3.4. Chloroplast and thylakoid structures
Mesophyll cells of leaves have many chloroplasts, which contain the specialized light-absorbing green pigments, chlorophylls. Thus, the most active photosynthetic tissue in higher plants is the mesophyll in leaves. The most striking aspect of the structure of the chloroplast is the extensive system of internal membranes known as thylakoids. Chlorophyll is found within the thylakoid membrane system, which is the site of the light reaction of photosynthesis. Transmission electron microscopy images showed that the ultrastructure of the chloroplasts in P. quinquefolius was ellipsoidal, whereas that of the chloroplasts in the P. ginseng cultivars was spherical (Fig. 4A). In barley, the shape of the chloroplasts is ellipsoidal in the light and enlarged and round in the dark [31]. Thus, P. quinquefolius used in this study may have originated from a higher-latitude area than the P. ginseng cultivars, and it has evolved for less densely shaded habitats. We cannot exclude the possibility that P. quinquefolius used in this study might be acclimated to a given condition and may not represent its original habitat. Sun-type chloroplasts have more nonappressed thylakoids, and shade-type chloroplasts have more appressed thylakoids that comprise almost the entire chloroplast [32], [33]. Overall, the transmission electron microscopy ultrastructural images showed that both ginseng species were typical shade-adapted plants (Fig. 4). The chloroplast ultrastructure of the ginseng leaves showed large well-developed grana stacks that extended across the entire chloroplast (Fig. 4). The thylakoid membrane stacks of Yunpoong and Chunpoong were more loosely flattened than those of P. quinquefolius (Fig. 4B). The thylakoid structure of Gumpoong was more similar to that of P. quinquefolius (Fig. 4A) than that of Yunpoong and Chunpoong.
Fig. 4.
Chloroplast and magnified thylakoid membrane structures. (A) Chloroplast morphology of three Panax ginseng cultivars and Panax quinquefolius is different. Bar, 5 μm. (B) Magnified chloroplast structure shows differently stacked thylakoid membranes. Bar, 500 nm.
4. Conclusions
P. ginseng cultivars are derived from three lines, Jakyung, Chungkyung, and Hwangsook, by pure-line selection [20], and they are registered in the Korea Seed and Variety Service (http://www.seed.go.kr). Among nine cultivars, leaves of several superior P. ginseng cultivars, Yunpoong for a high-yielding variety from the Jakyung line, Chunpoong for red-ginseng manufacture from the Chungkyung line, and Gumpoong for disease resistance from the Hwangsook line were cytohistologically compared with the leaves of P. quinquefolius. As an obligate shade-loving plant, ginseng needs to be grown under an artificial cloth or under densely shaded forests. The most popularly used shade cloth in Korea is a lightweight knitted polyethylene fabric that protects plants from the sun. Thus, breeding ginseng cultivars to be grown under natural sunshine without any artificial shading will greatly reduce total cultivation expenses. Crossing two different ginseng species can result in more light-resistant cultivars. P. quinquefolius generally shows a more light-adapted phenotype than several P. ginseng cultivars. The anticlinal walls of the adaxial surface of leaf epidermal cells were wavy and showed similar patterned cuticle ridges in P. quinquefolius and P. ginseng cultivars (Fig. 2B). The microscopic characteristics of the surface view were the same as those of a previously characterized 5-yr-old P. quinquefolius plant [34]. The abaxial surface of the leaf epidermis was also wavy in the two different ginseng species with similar number of stomata (Figs. 2C and 2D). The density of stomata in leaves in a sunny habitat is significantly higher than that in leaves in a shady habitat [23]. Highly dividing cells from leaf tips showed similarly structured forms in the midvein, both sides of epidermis cells in the midvein, and vascular bundles (Fig. 3A). The most striking features in the mesostructure of the ginseng leaves were the one layer of palisade cells, which are commonly cylindrical but were rather spherical and oval (Fig. 3B). The leaf mesophyll consisted of three or four cell layers of spongy parenchymal cells (Fig. 3) in P. quinquefolius and P. ginseng cultivars. Overall surface and internal leaf structures suggest that P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius are both sciophytes with few cells and chloroplasts per unit leaf area. This finding corresponds with that of a previous study on P. quinquefolius grown in Russia [35]. An important feature of shade plants is their chloroplast size and ultrastructure. The density of grana stacks in shade plants is always higher than the density of those in chloroplasts from plants exposed to full sunlight [32], [33], [36], [37]. The shape of chloroplasts from P. ginseng was rounder than the ellipsoidal chloroplasts from P. quinquefolius (Fig. 4). A previous study showed that light-illuminated chloroplasts are ellipsoidal rather than round and enlarged during the dark period [31]. P. quinquefolius seemed more adapted to sunny conditions than the P. ginseng cultivars. The thylakoid membranes in P. quinquefolius were also appressed tightly with distinctly apparent grana stacks and decreased stroma volume. However, the most popular P. ginseng cultivars, Yunpoong and Chunpoong, showed relatively loosely stacked grana extended over the entire chloroplast body (Fig. 4B). Thus, the two different ginseng species are shade-loving sciophytic plants that share most ultrastructural features such as stacks of grana and stroma. The results obtained in this study can be useful not only for breeding light-adaptable cultivars but also for authentication of different widely cultivated species.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (SSAC, Grant No. PJ011129012016); Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
References
- 1.Attle A., Wu J., Yuan C. Ginseng pharmacology: multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;58:1685–1693. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00212-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee O.R., Sathiyaraj G., Kim Y.J., In J.G., Kwon W.S., Kim J.H., Yang D.C. Defense genes induced by pathogens and abiotic stresses in Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. J Ginseng Res. 2011;35:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yi T., Lowry P.P., Plunkett G.M., Wen J. Chromosomal evolution in Araliaceae and close relatives. Taxon. 2004;53:987–1005. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Choi H.W., Choi D.H., Bang K.H., Paek K.Y., Seong N.S., Bak J.W. FISH and GISH analysis of the genomic relationships among Panax species. Genes Genomics. 2009;31:99–105. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Choi H., Waminal N.E., Park H.M., Kim N.H., Choi B.S., Park M., Choi D., Lim Y.P., Kwon S.J., Park B.S. Major repeat components covering one-third of the ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) genome and evidence for allotetraploidy. Plant J. 2014;77:906–916. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hong C.P., Lee S.J., Park J.Y., Plaha P., Park Y.S., Lee Y.K., Choi J.E., Kim K.Y., Lee J.H., Jin H. Construction of a BAC library of Korean ginseng and initial analysis of BAC-end sequences. Mol Genet Genomics. 2004;271:709–716. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Obae S.G., West T.P. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of American ginseng. J Med Plants Res. 2012;6:4719–4723. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Choi H.I., Kim N.H., Lee J., Choi B.S., Kim K.D., Park J.Y., Lee S.C., Yang T.J. Evolutionary relationship of Panax ginseng and P. quinquefolius inferred from sequencing and comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2013;60:1377–1387. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bae H.W. Introduction. In: Bae H.W., editor. Korean ginseng. 2nd ed. Korean Ginseng Research Institute; Seoul: 1978. pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li S.C. Panax ginseng. In: Bliss B., editor. Chinese medicinal herbs. Georgetown Press; San Francisco: 1973. pp. 301–304. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim Y.H., Yu Y.H., Lee J.H., Park C.S., Ohh S.H. Effect of shading on the quality of raw, red, and white ginseng and the contents of some minerals in ginseng roots. Korean J Ginseng Sci. 1990;14:36–43. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheon S.K., Mob S.K., Lee S.S., Shin D.T. Effects of light intensity and quality on the growth and quality of Koreanginseng (Panaxginseng C.A. Meyer). 1. Effects of light intensity on growth and yield of ginseng plants. Korean J Ginseng Sci. 1991;15:21–30. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Proctor J.T.A., Lee J.C., Lee S.S. Ginseng production in Korea. Hort Sci. 1990;25:746–750. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu C.N. 1988. Cultural methods of ginseng (in Chinese) Wu-Chou Publ. Co., Taipei, Taiwan. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Persons W.S. Bright Mountain Books; Asheville, NC: 1986. American ginseng green gold. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miskell J.A., Parmenter G., Eaton-Rye J. Decreased Hill reaction rates and slow turnover of transitory starch in the obligate shade plant Panax quinquefolius L. (American ginseng) Planta. 2002;215:969–979. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0839-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li T.S.C. Vol. 5. 1995. Asian and American ginseng; pp. 27–34. (Hort Technology). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xiao P.G., Zhu Z.Y., Zhang F.Q., Zhu W.H., Chen J.T., Zhang G.D., Liu G.T. 1987. Ginseng research and cultivation Beijing: Agriculture Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee S.S., Lee J.H., Ahn I.O. Characteristics of new cultivars in Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. Kor Soc Ginseng. 2005;11:3–18. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee O.R., Kim Y.J., Devi B.S.R., Khorolragchaa A., Sathiyaraj G., Kim M.K., Yang D.C. Expression of the ginseng PgPR10-1 in Arabidopsis confers resistance against fungal and bacterial infection. Gene. 2012;506:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jo I.H., Kim Y.C., Kim J.U., Lee S.H., Lim J.Y., Moon J.Y., Noh B.S., Hyun D.Y., Kim D.H., Kim K.H. A rapid identification of Korean ginseng cultivar, Cheonryang, using specific DNA markers. Korean J Med Crop Sci. 2014;22:429–434. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Adebooye O.C., Hunsche M., Noga G., Lankes C. Morphology and density of trichomes and stomata of Trichosanthes cucumerica (Cucurbitaceae) as affected by leaf age and salinity. Turk J Bot. 2012;36:328–335. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marques A.R., Garcia Q.S., Fernandes G.W. Effects of sun and shade on leaf structure and sclerophylly of Sebastiania Myrtilloides (Euphorbiaceae) from Serra Do CiPo, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Bol Bot Univ Sao Paulo. 1999;18:21–27. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Haberlandt G. Macmillan; London: 1914. Physiological plant anatomy. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kozuka T., Kong S.G., Doi M., Shimazaki K., Nagatani A. Tissue-autonomous promotion of palisade cell development by phototropin 2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:3684–3695. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.085852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huala E., Oeller P.W., Liscum E., Han I.S., Larsen E., Briggs W.R. Arabidopsis NPH1: a protein kinase with a putative redox-sensing domain. Science. 1997;278:2120–2123. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kagawa T., Sakai T., Suetsugu N., Oikawa K., Ishguro S., Kato T., Tabata S., Okada K., Wada M. Arabidopsis NPL1:A phototropin homolog controlling the chloroplast high-light avoidance response. Science. 2001;291:2138–2141. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5511.2138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Esau K. 2nd ed. John Wiley; New York: 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tereshima I., Saeki T. Light environment within a leaf 1. Optical properties of paradermal sections of Camellia leaves with special reference to differences in the optical-properties of palisade and spongy tissues. Plant Cell Physiol. 1983;24:1493–1501. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Terashima I., Hanba Y.T., Tazoe Y., Vyas P., Yano S. Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:343–354. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pfeiffer S., Krupinska K. New insights in thylakoid membrane organization. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:1443–1451. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Anderson J.M. Photoregulation of the composition, function, and structure of thylakoid membranes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1986;37:93–136. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yano S., Terashima I. Separate localization of light signal perception for sun or shade type chloroplast and palisade tissue differentiation in Chenopodium album. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:1303–1310. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li B., Sun M., Wang J.X., Ren Y., Liu Y., Zhang Z.F., Lu L.Y., Zhang J.Z., Zeng R., Li L.M. Authentication of morphological and microscopic features of stem and leaf of Panax quinquefolius L. grown in Ontario, Canada. Adv Medicinal Plant Res. 2014;2:34–40. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khrolenko Y., Burundukova O., Burkovskaya E., Zhuravlev Y. Mesophyll structure and chloroplast density in Panax ginseng leaves from the Sikhote-Alin MTS. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica. 2012;54:54–60. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murakami S., Packer L. Light-induced changes in the conformation and configuration of the thylakoid membrane of Ulva and Porphyra chloroplasts in vivo. Plant Physiol. 1970;45:289–299. doi: 10.1104/pp.45.3.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Melis A., Harvey G.W. Regulation of photosystem stoichiometry, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content and relation to chloroplast ultrastructure. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981;637:138–145. [Google Scholar]




