Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2017 Sep 12;54(11):3679–3688. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2830-2

κ-Casein as a source of short-chain bioactive peptides generated by Lactobacillus helveticus

Katarzyna Skrzypczak 1,, Waldemar Gustaw 1, Dominik Szwajgier 2, Emilia Fornal 3, Adam Waśko 2
PMCID: PMC5629177  PMID: 29051663

Abstract

This paper explores the ability of Lactobacillus helveticus strains to release sequences of short biologically active peptides (containing 2–10 amino acid residues) from casein. The proteolytic enzymes of the tested strains exhibit different patterns of cleavage of CN fractions. The modification of κ-casein (κ-CN) with pyrrolidone carboxylic acid inhibits the proteolytic activity of strains L. helveticus 141 and the reference strain (DSMZ 20075), while the modification with phosphothreonine inhibits enzymes of all the tested bacteria. The peptide sequencing analysis indicated that the examined strains produced functional peptides very efficiently. κ-CN proved to be the main source of short peptides released by bacterial enzymes, and the hydrolysis of κ-CN yielded eighty-two bioactive peptides. The hydrolysis of αS2-casein, αS1-casein, and β-casein yielded six, two, and one short-chain bioactive peptides, respectively. The isolated bioactive peptides exhibited antioxidative, opioid, stimulating, hypotensive, immunomodulating, antibacterial, and antithrombotic activities. A vast majority of the isolated bioactive peptides caused inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme and dipeptidyl peptidase IV. The role of hydrolysis products as neuropeptides is also pointed out. The highest number of cleavage sites in κ-casein and functional activities of short-chain peptides were obtained in hydrolyzates produced by L. helveticus strain T105.

Keywords: Lactobacillus helveticus, Biologically active peptides, κ-Casein (κ-CN)

Introduction

The development of functional foods and nutraceuticals is connected with the increasing consumers’ awareness of the impact of the diet on health. Considerable attention is being paid to biologically active food ingredients that contribute to beneficial health effects.

Therefore, a great effort has been made to study milk and whey proteins as valuable precursors of bioactive components. However, the active functional properties can be released from casein only by proteolytic degradation. This can be obtained through enzymatic hydrolysis during milk fermentation involving a complex proteolytic system of bacterial starter cultures (Michaelidou 2008). Casein proteolysis is initiated by bacterial extracellular proteases, while the transporting system enables intracellular peptidases inside the cell to conduct further hydrolysis (Savijoki et al. 2006).

The proteolysis process in food industry has particular importance during cheese ripening, where the texture and the sensory and organoleptic characteristics are developed.

Bioactive peptides are defined as fragments of proteins that exert a positive influence on body systems, improving their functioning and leading to health-promoting effects (Kitts and Weiler 2003). The size of the peptides is very diverse and ranges from 2 to 20 amino acid residues. However, their functional properties are associated with the composition and amino acid sequences; furthermore, many of these peptides exhibit simultaneously a wide range of very different bioactivities (Korhonen and Pihlanto 2006; Dziuba and Dziuba 2014; Bhat et al. 2015). Moreover, peptides released during the fermentation process and their functional properties are affected by the types of bacterial cultures used (Szwajkowska et al. 2011).

Due to their high proteolytic activity, lactic acid production, rate of milk acidification, and ability to form the flavor and texture, Lactobacillus helveticus are often used for the production of fermented milk beverages and hard cheeses. Furthermore, the great diversity of LAB proteolytic enzymes and the specificity of enzyme activity are still a wide field of study focusing on their biotechnological applications (Budiarto et al. 2016).

Moreover, lactic acid fermentation is a promising method for acquisition of bioactive peptides; therefore, analysis of the proteolytic profile exhibited by new strains sets a wide path to obtaining functional food (Dziuba and Dziuba 2014; Bhat et al. 2015; Pessione and Cirrincione 2016). Strains of L. helveticus exhibit strong extracellular proteinase activity and capacity to liberate a significant number of various peptides during milk fermentation (Pihlanto 2013).

The number of cell envelope proteinases (CEPs) varies among L. helveticus strains and ranges from 1 to 4 enzymes (Sadat-Mekmene et al. 2013). CEPs are very specific and differ among L. helveticus strains; moreover, casein cleavage sites depend on the primary structure of the protein fraction under hydrolysis (Jensen et al. 2009; Sadat-Mekmene et al. 2011a). So far, three different types of cell envelope proteinases have been identified: PI-type that exhibit preference to β-CN; PIII-type, which preferentially hydrolyze all casein fractions (but different patterns of β-CN hydrolysis have been noticed), and PI/III type, in which enzymes exhibiting intermediate properties of the PIII-type and PI-type have been classified (Visser et al. 1986; Exterkate et al. 1993; Juillard et al. 1995).

Identification of peptide sequences generated by L. helveticus as a result of casein hydrolysis may lead to selection of a particular strain able to produce peptides with defined bioactivity. This might yield new biologically active substances or contribute to a more efficient use of L. helveticus strains in the production of functional foods, nutraceuticals, or even pharmaceuticals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the sequence of peptides released from casein by selected L. helveticus strains. It should be mentioned that these strains have not been previously used for this purpose on an industrial scale. Another aim of the research was to analyze the potential biological activities of the short amino acid sequences obtained. Moreover, an attempt was made to analyze the ability of the bacterial strains to hydrolyze CN and to compare the patterns of κ-CN cleavages sites caused by the enzymes produced by the tested bacterial strains.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Two strains of L. helveticus 141 and T105 were kindly provided by Prof. Łucja Łaniewska-Trokenheim from the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland. The strains were deposited in the Polish Microorganism Collection (Wrocław, Poland). Both strains and L. helveticus DSMZ 20075 (Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany) used as a reference strain were cultured in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe broth (BTL, Poland) according to the method proposed by Waśko et al. (2014).

Casein hydrolysis

After 12 h of culture incubation, bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (10.000×g, 10 min, 4 °C) and washed twice with distilled sterile water. A volume of 200 μl of whole washed cell suspensions (OD600 = 1) were mixed with 5 ml of 1% (vol/vol) solution of casein from bovine milk (Sigma-Aldrich). The hydrolysis of proteins was carried out at 37 °C for 12 h. The hydrolyzates obtained were centrifuged (13.000×g, 8 min, 5 °C). Supernatants were immediately collected, filtered through 0.45 μm syringe filters, and gel filtration chromatography was directly performed as described below.

Gel filtration chromatography

The BioLogic DuoFlow system (Bio-Rad, USA) consisting of two BioLogic pumps, a QuadTec UV–Vis detector (280 nm), and a BioFrac fraction collector was used in the preparative mode. For separations, Sephacryl S-100 HR gel (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was packed in a Bio-Rad Econo glass column (2.5 × 50 cm); this was followed by equilibration with deionized water containing 0.01% sodium azide (0.85 cm3/min, 24 h). For separations, a volume of 4 cm3of the sample (casein hydrolyzate) was loaded onto the column and this was followed by separation using deionized water with 0.01% NaN3 (0.7 cm3/min). Collected fractions (2 mL) were dialyzed against deionized water, frozen at −80 °C for 2 h, and lyophilized (Labconco, Kansas City, USA).

Liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) and peptide sequencing

Twenty-five fractions from gel filtration were loaded onto the column and sequencing. The analyzes were performed using an Agilent nano-HPLC chromatograph series 1200 coupled to Agilent LC/MS QTOF 6538 equipped with a chip-cube ion source. Agilent HPLC-Chip G4240-62001 was composed of a 40 nl enrichment column and a 75 µm × 43 mm separation column packed with Zorbax 300 SB-C18 5 µm material, which was used for the separation of peptides. A linear gradient from 3 to 95% B over 9 min was applied with the mobile phase composed of solvent A: aqueous 0.1% formic acid and B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (0.5 µl min−1). The ion source fragmentor voltage was set at 200 V. Data were acquired in a full scan MS mode, and positive ions were generated and registered at the m/z range of 100–1700. Agilent Mass Hunter acquisition B.05.01 software was used for data acquisition, and Agilent Mass Hunter qualitative analysis B.07 with integrated Bioconfirm add-on software was used for data analysis and peptide mapping.

Assay of the biological activities of peptide sequences

The profiles of potential biological activities of the peptide sequences obtained were determined according the procedure included in the BIOPEP database (Perkins et al. 1999; Minkiewicz et al. 2008; Dziuba et al. 2009).

Results and discussion

Casein hydrolysis

The significance of casein in food industry is associated with its technological properties and presence of a wide range of bioactive sequence precursors in the native milk protein structure (Wang et al. 2013).

This study demonstrated that κ-CN was susceptible to the action of proteases produced by all examined strains. L. helveticus T105 was the most effective strain that hydrolyzed κ-CN at 73 cleavage sites (Fig. 1). 55 and 35 cleavage sites were identified strains L. helveticus 141 and DSMZ 20075, respectively. Furthermore, 18 different residue sites in position P1 (i.e. the residue on the primary sequence of the protein preceding the amino-terminal residue of the peptide) underwent cleavage, including hydrophobic residues (Ala, Leu, Phe, and Val), non-charged polar residues (Ser, Thr, and Gln), and negatively charged hydrophilic residues (Glu and Asp). Peptide bonds located after the residues of Cys, Trp, Asx, Glx, Gly, and His underwent few or no cut. In addition, in the case of T105 and DSMZ 20075 strains, most of the cleavage sites of κ-CN were located in the hydrophobic C-terminal fragment. Our results also revealed that the signal peptide of κ-CN was hydrolyzed by two strains: L. helveticus T105 and 141.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Peptide bonds of bovine κ-CN hydrolyzed after 12 h of incubation with the proteolytic system of Lactobacillus helveticus. a Strain T105, b strain 141, c strain DSMZ 20075

It has been suggested that the occurrence of various CEPs in L. helveticus (PrtH, PrtH2) is a strain-dependent property (Broadbent et al. 2011; Sadat-Mekmene et al. 2011a, b). It has been revealed that αs1-casein was hydrolyzed much more slowly by strains exhibiting the presence of only one CEP (Sadat-Mekmene et al. 2011a). In turn, L. helveticus BGRA43 possessing only PrtH was able to hydrolyze completely all casein fractions, but αs1-CN and β-CN were hydrolyzed faster than κ-CN (Strahinic et al. 2013). However, cell envelope proteinase may exhibit some differences in terms of affinity and specificity to particular casein fractions (Kunji et al. 1996). It was also concluded that CEPs involved in the formation of ACE inhibitory peptides are strain-specific (Xing et al. 2012). Therefore, it can be supposed that the affinity and specificity to different casein fractions exhibited by CEPs of L. helveticus strains might be related to the observed differences in the amounts of products obtained after hydrolysis as well as the variety of amino acid sequences. Our results confirm the high variability of the strains in terms of their ability to hydrolyze casein fractions.

The results also indicate that the glycosylated C-terminal fragment (called macropeptide or glycomacropeptide) is hydrolyzed by L. helveticus strains (Fig. 2). Moreover, the presence of modified phosphoserine as well as glycosylation of the protein did not affect the hydrolysis.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kappa casein sequence (Based on: http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P02668) with marked different types of modifications

Our study confirmed that the regions containing phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues were always very resistant to hydrolysis by CEP produced by the tested L. helveticus strains (Fig. 2).

Studies on the biological activities of obtained peptide sequences

Milk is a widespread food product and a valuable source of bioactive components that can be released by bacterial proteolysis (FitzGerald and Murray 2006; Jäkälä and Vapaatalo 2010).

Over the last two decades, increasing importance of protein in food science has been observed, which is connected with research on the properties of bioactive peptides and their functionalities (Chakrabarti et al. 2014; Dziuba and Dziuba 2014; Bhat et al. 2015).

The investigated L. helveticus strains exhibited a varied ability to hydrolyze casein, leading to the production of bioactive peptides. Out of the 1002 short peptides derived from casein enzymatic hydrolysis performed by the tested strains, 91 peptides were clearly identified as bioactive according to the BIOPEP database (Table 1). Short sequences (containing 2-10 amino acids) formed during 12 h of casein hydrolysis are summarized in Table 1. Two of the bioactive sequences derived from αS1-casein hydrolysis, 6 from αS2-casein, 1 from β-casein, and 82 from κ-casein.

Table 1.

Peptides identified in the casein hydrolysates released by the CEP activity of L. helveticus strains

Casein precursor Peptide identitya Mass (Da) Sequence Scoreb Activityc Strain
αS1-casein f(209–214) 747.3 TTMPLW 29.2 ACE inhibitor, immunomodulating, opioid, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSMd
f(106–115) 1266.6 YLGYLEQLLR 29.0 ACE inhibitor, opioid 141
αS2-casein f(130–140) 1194.6 NAVPITPTLNR 24.7 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(168–173) 743.3 LTEEEK 29.4 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(204–212) 1199.6 AMKPWIQPK 23.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(204–214) 1326.7 AMKPWIQPKTK 28.3 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor DSM
f(213–222) 1250.7 TKVIPYVRYL 29.0 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, neuropeptide, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(215–222) 1021.5 VIPYVRYL 29.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM, 141
β-casein f(218–224) 741,4 GPFPIIV 29.1 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
κ-Casein f(4–11) 924.5 SFFLVVTI 20.0 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM, 141
f(5–6) 312.1 FF 29.9 141
f(6–7) 278.1 FL 29.9 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(7–10) 430.2 LVVT 26.7 141
f(17–25) 1002.4 PFLGAQEQN 21.7 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(19–26) 886.4 LGAQEQNQ 21.5 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(22–23) 275.1 QE 29.9 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(25–32) 986.4 NQEQPIRC 25.1 ACE inhibitor, hypotensive 141
f(26–32) 872.4 QEQPIRC 25.2 ACE inhibitor, hypotensive DSM
f(26–34) 1129.5 QEQPIRCEK 19.5 ACE inhibitor, hypotensive, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(35–40) 799.3 DERFFS 29.9 ACE inhibitor T105
f(35–41) 914.3 DERFFSD 29.5 ACE inhibitor T105
f(35–44) 1226.5 DERFFSDKIA 29.8 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(37–38) 321.1 RF 29.6 ACE inhibitor 141
f(37–39) 468.2 RFF 29.9 ACE inhibitor T105
f(40–47) 936.5 SDKIAKYI 27.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(41–48) 946.5 DKIAKYIP 27.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(43–51) 1107.6 IAKYIPIQY 29.5 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor DSM
f(44–49) 703.4 AKYIPI 29.8 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(46–53) 1007.5 YIPIQYVL 21.2 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, stimulating, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(56–58) 365.3 YPS 27.2 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(57–58) 202.0 PS 29.1 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(59–62) 465.2 YGLN 27.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(59–69) 1371.6 YGLNYYQQKPV 28.0 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(66–72) 767.4 QKPVALI 23.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(67–73) 753.4 KPVALIN 27.1 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(74–80) 887.4 NQFLPYP 26.3 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(74–83) 1274.5 NQFLPYPYYA 30.0 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, opioid, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(76–86) 1328.0 FLPYPYYAKPA 27.1 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, opioid, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(77–82) 814.3 LPYPYY 28.8 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, 141
f(76–81) 798.3 FLPYPY 29.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(80–84) 640.3 PYYAK 30 ACE inhibitor 141
f(80–85) 737.3 PYYAKP 29.2 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(81–89) 1037.5 YYAKPAAVR 24.4 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(82–85) 477.2 YAKP 29.0 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(82–88) 718.3 YAKPAAV 24.1 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(89–92) 429.2 RSPA 25.6 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(100–106) 700.3 LSNTVPA 29.8 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(102–110) 946.4 NTVPAKSCQ 29.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(102–112) 1143.5 NTVPAKSCQAQ 28.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(103–111) 903.4 TVPAKSCQA 24.3 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(105–113) 928.4 PAKSCQAQP 27.9 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(110–119) 1139.5 QAQPTTMARH 26.8 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(114–118) 678.2 TTMAR 28.5 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM, 141
f(115–122) 945.4 TMARHPHP 19.9 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(116–121) 747.3 MARHPH 29.3 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(118–127) 1257.6 RHPHPHLSFM 28.1 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(119–127) 1101.5 HPHPHLSFM 20.1 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(121–132) 1373.7 HPHLSFMAIPPK 29.0 ACE inhibitor, antitrombotic, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(124–126) 365.1 LSF 29.6 ACE inhibitor 141
f(124–127) 496.2 LSFM 28.9 ACE inhibitor 141
f(130–135) 710.4 PPKKNQ 24.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(136–142) 802.4 DKTEIPT 29.8 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(136–147) 1315. 7 DKTEIPTINTIA 29.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(137–147) 1199.6 KTEIPTINTIA 29.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(138–144) 786.4 TEIPTIN 29.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(139–147) 970.5 EIPTINTIA 29.0 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(139–148) 1057.5 EIPTINTIAS 29.0 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(141–144) 443.2 PTIN 29.8 ACE inhibitor DSM
f(141–151) 1098.5 PTINTIASGEP 20.6 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(146–149) 346.6 IASG 29.3 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(154–164) 1133.5 TPTTEAVESTV 22.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor DSM
f(155–161) 745.3 PTTEAVE 30.0 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(155–162) 832.3 PTTEAVES 29.7 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(155–164) 1032.4 PTTEAVESTV 29.4 ACE inhibitor DSM
f(157–167) 1119.5 TEAVESTVATL 21.9 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(158–167) 1018.5 EAVESTVATL 29.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor 141
f(159–167) 889.9 AVESTVATL 29.3 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(164–169) 646.3 VATLED 26.8 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(168–178) 1197.5 EDSPEVIESPP 24.9 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(171–173) 343.1 PEV 29.4 141
f(171–180) 1108.5 PEVIESPPEI 24.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(173–181) 996.5 VIESPPEIN 29.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(173–182) 1097.5 VIESPPEINT 30.0 Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, 141
f(174–185) 1324.6 IESPPEINTVQV 28.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105
f(176–181) 655.3 SPPEIN 29.8 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(176–184) 983.4 SPPEINTVQ 29.0 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(176–186) 1183.6 SPPEINTVQVT 28.4 ACE inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(182–190) 904.4 TVQVTSTAV 29.8 ACE inhibitor, antibacterial, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(183–189) 704.3 VQVTSTA 29.6 Antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(183–190) 803.4 VQVTSTAV 29.8 ACE inhibitor DSM, 141
f(185–190) 576.3 VTSTAV 29.9 ACE inhibitor, antioxidative, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor T105, DSM
f(187–190) 376.1 STAV 29.1 ACE inhibitor DSM

aNumbers refer to amino acid positions in the casein protein sequence

bBased on Perkins et al. (1999)

cBased on Minkiewicz et al. (2008)

dReferring to strain L. helveticus DSMZ 20075

The analysis indicates that β-CN and αs1-CN were more resistant to hydrolysis than the other fractions, which can be related to the presence of phosphoserine in their structures (Chang et al. 2014; Ha et al. 2015).

The results indicate that κ-CN is a dominant precursor for short-chain peptides, which may be related to the casein structure. The κ-fraction is responsible for stabilization of the molecular structure of casein micelles (Horne 2006). The localization on the exterior surface of micelles might affect the susceptibility of κ-CN to proteolytic enzymes, leading to the release of a large number of short-chain peptides. Interestingly, only one bioactive sequence was generated from the β-CN region by L. helveticus 141, which suggests the lowest ability of the tested strains to generate short-chain peptides.

Several different functional activities have been identified in the products obtained (Table 1). A vast majority of the peptides exerted inhibitory activity towards the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and dipeptidyl peptidase IV.

High ACE inhibitory activities have been confirmed in peptides containing Phe, Pro, Tyr, or Trp at C-terminal amino acid sequences and Ser, Val, Ile, and Ala at the N-terminus (Jao et al. 2012). The analysis of the sequence indicates that the tested L. helveticus strains are able to release short fragments produced from αS1- and αS2-CN with preferences to the C-terminal regions (Table 1).

The identified sequences TTMPLW produced by strain T105 from αs1-CN and VIESPPEIN produced by strains DSMZ 20075 and T105 from κ-CN were also found in hydrolyzates obtained with the use of L. helveticus NCC 619 and were described as peptides inhibiting the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) (Robert et al. 2001). A strong antihypertensive effect of TTMPLW was observed in spontaneously hypertensive rats orally fed with a dose of 100 mg/kg (IC50 = 16 μM) of this peptide (Wakai and Yamamoto 2012). The analysis of the sequence of the peptide produced by strains T105 and DSMZ 20075 (Table 1) indicates a wider range of potential activities (inhibitory activity towards ACE and dipeptidyl peptidase IV as well as immunomodulating, opioid, and antioxidative activity).

The κ-CN-derived sequence VIESPPEIN was produced by all the analyzed L. helveticus strains. This peptide was previously detected in milk fermented by a Lactococcus lactis wild-type strain (Algaron et al. 2004). Similarly, Robert et al. (2001) obtained the VIESPPEIN peptide using L. helveticus NCC 619 and confirmed the ACE inhibitory activity of this sequence.

Among all the studied strains, L. helveticus T105 was able to produce the highest number of short peptides possessing the most diverse functional activities (Table 1).

Figure 3 presents an example of an LC/MS-extracted compound chromatogram of the TVQVTSTAV peptide. This peptide derived from κ-CN f(182–190) and was identified in samples containing casein and inoculated with strains T105 or DSMZ 20075 (Table 1). Interestingly, the same sequence was identified in whey protein concentrate hydrolyzed by the extract of Cynara cardunculus (Tavares et al. 2011) or in milk fermented by specific Lactococcus lactis wild type strains (Rodríguez-Figueroa et al. 2012).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

LC/MS-extracted compound chromatogram (ad) of peptide TVQVTSTAV

Conclusion

L. helveticus strains exhibit various caseinolytic activities as well as various patterns of casein degradation. The present investigation has demonstrated that κ-CN glycosylation or the presence of modified phosphoserine did not affect the hydrolysis.

The variety of cleavage patterns of the casein fractions resulted in a considerable number of peptide sequences generated during the study. After 12 h of casein incubation with the proteolytic system of L. helveticus strains, many different bioactive peptides were obtained. The potential biological properties include the inhibitory activity towards ACE and dipeptidyl peptidase IV as well as antibacterial, antioxidant, opioid, stimulating, hypotensive, immunomodulating, and antithrombotic activity. The role of the hydrolysis products as neuropeptides is also pointed out.

Among all the tested strains, L. helveticus T105 most efficiently hydrolyzed κ-casein most efficiently. This result suggests that strain T105 has great potential to be used in fermented dairy products with functional properties or for production of new pharmaceutical formulations. The presented results of the research have practical relevance. L. helveticus strain T105 can be used as an effective tool for production of bioactive peptides obtained from casein hydrolysis. Our results prompt the use of a new method for production of new health-oriented food products. Based on the promising findings presented in this paper, further investigations verifying the biological activity of the peptides obtained in vivo should be conducted.

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland (Research Grant No. 2014/15/N/NZ9/04042).

References

  1. Algaron F, Miranda G, Le Bars D, Monnet V. Milk fermentation by Lactococcus lactis with modified proteolytic systems to accumulate potentially bio-active peptides. Lait. 2004;84:115–123. doi: 10.1051/lait:2003034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhat ZF, Kumar S, Bhat HF. Bioactive peptides of animal origin: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52:5377–5392. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1731-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Broadbent JR, Cai H, Larsen RL, Hughes JE, Welker DL, de Carvalho VG, Tompkins TA, Ardö Y, Vogensen F, de Lorentiis A, Gatti M, Neviani E, Steele JL. Genetic diversity in proteolytic enzymes and amino acid metabolism among Lactobacillus helveticus strains. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:4313–4328. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Budiarto BR, Mustopa AZ, Idarmawan T. Characterization of partially extracellular proteases from bekasam-isolated Lactobacillus plantarum S31 and its application to hydrolyze skimmed-milk with antibacterial property. IFRJ. 2016;23:340–349. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chakrabarti S, Jahandideh F, Wu J. Food-derived bioactive peptides on inflammation and oxidative stress. Biomed Res. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/608979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang OK, Roux E, Awussi AA, Miclo L, Jardin J, Jameh N, Dary A, Humbert G, Perrin C. Use of a free form of the Streptococcus thermophilus cell envelope protease PrtS as a tool to produce bioactive peptides. Int Dairy J. 2014;38:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dziuba B, Dziuba M. Milk proteins-derived bioactive peptides in dairy products: molecular, biological and methodological aspects. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2014;13:5–25. doi: 10.17306/J.AFS.2014.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dziuba M, Dziuba B, Iwaniak A. Milk proteins as precursors of bioactive peptides. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2009;8:71–90. [Google Scholar]
  9. Exterkate FA, Alting AC, Bruinenberg PG. Diversity of cell envelope proteinase specificity among strains of Lactococcuslactis and its relationship to charge characteristics of the substrate-binding region. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:3640–3647. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.11.3640-3647.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FitzGerald RJ, Murray BA. Bioactive peptides and lactic fermentations. Int J Dairy Technol. 2006;59:118–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2006.00250.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ha GE, Chang OK, Jo SM, Han GS, Park BY, Ham JS, Jeong SG. Identification of antihypertensive peptides derived from low molecular weight casein hydrolysates generated during fermentation by Bifidobacterium longum KACC 91563. Korean J Food Sci Anim. 2015;35:738–747. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horne DS. Casein micelle structure: models and muddles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;11:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2005.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jäkälä P, Vapaatalo H. Antihypertensive peptides from milk proteins. Pharmaceuticals. 2010;3:251–272. doi: 10.3390/ph3010251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jao CL, Huang SL, Hsu KC. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides: inhibition mode, bioavailability, and antihypertensive effects. Biomedicine. 2012;2:130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.biomed.2012.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jensen MP, Vogensen FK, Ardo Y. Variation in caseinolytic properties of six cheese related Lactobacillus helveticus strains. Int Dairy J. 2009;19:661–668. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Juillard V, Laan H, Kunji ER, Jeronimus-Stratingh CM, Bruins AP, Konings WN. The extracellular P I-type proteinase of Lactococcuslactis hydrolyzes β-casein into more than one hundred different oligopeptides. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:3472–3478. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.12.3472-3478.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kitts DD, Weiler K. Bioactive proteins and peptides from food sources. Applications of bioprocesses used in isolation and recovery. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9:1309–1323. doi: 10.2174/1381612033454883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Korhonen H, Pihlanto A. Bioactive peptides: production and functionality. Int Dairy J. 2006;16:945–960. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kunji ERS, Mierau I, Hagting A, Poolman B, Konings WN. The proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1996;70:187–221. doi: 10.1007/BF00395933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Michaelidou AM. Factors influencing nutritional and health profile of milk and milk products. Small Rumin Res. 2008;79:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Minkiewicz P, Dziuba J, Iwaniak A, Dziuba M, Darewicz M. BIOPEP database and other programs for processing bioactive peptide sequences. J AOAC Int. 2008;91:965–980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20:3551–3567. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pessione E, Cirrincione S. Bioactive molecules released in food by lactic acid bacteria: encrypted peptides and biogenic amines. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:876. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pihlanto A. Lactic fermentation and bioactive peptides. In: Kongo M, editor. Lactic acid bacteria—R & D for food, health and livestock purposes. Croatia: InTech; 2013. pp. 309–333. [Google Scholar]
  25. Robert MC, Donnet-Hughes A, Juillerat MA (2001) Generation of bioactive peptides derived from caseins using a Lactobacillus helveticus strain. In: Peptides: the wave of the future: proceedings of the international and the american peptide symposium, 9 June 2001, pp 770–771
  26. Rodríguez-Figueroa JC, González-Córdova AF, Torres-Llanez MJ, Garcia HS, Vallejo-Cordoba B. Novel angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides produced in fermented milk by specific wild Lactococcuslactis strains. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:5536–5543. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sadat-Mekmene L, Genay M, Atlan D, Lortal S, Gagnaire V. Original features of cell-envelope proteinases of Lactobacillus helveticus: a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;146:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sadat-Mekmene L, Jardin J, Corre C, Mollé D, Richoux R, Delage MM, Lortal S, Gagnaire V. Simultaneous presence of PrtH and PrtH2 proteinases in strains improves breakdown of the pure αs1-casein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:179–186. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01466-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sadat-Mekmene L, Richoux R, Aubert-Frogerais L, Madec MN, Corre C, Piot M, et al. Lactobacillus helveticus as a tool to change proteolysis and functionality in Swiss-type cheeses. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:1455–1470. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Savijoki K, Ingmer H, Varmanen P. Proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;71:394–406. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0427-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Strahinic I, Lozo J, Terzic-Vidojevic A, Fira D, Kojic M, Golic N, Begovic J, Topisirovic L. Technological and probiotic potential of BGRA43 a natural isolate of Lactobacillus helveticus. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:2. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Szwajkowska M, Wolanciuk A, Barłowska J, Król J, Litwińczuk Z. Bovine milk protein as the source of bioactive peptides influencing the consumers’ immune system. Anim Sci Pap Rep. 2011;29:269–280. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tavares TG, Contreras MM, Amorim M, Martín-Álvarez PJ, Pintado ME, Recio I, Malcata FX. Optimisation, by response surface methodology, of degree of hydrolysis and antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activities of whey protein hydrolysates obtained with cardoon extract. Int Dairy J. 2011;21:926–933. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2011.05.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Visser S, Exterkate FA, Slangen CJ, de Veer GJCM. Comparative study of action of cell wall proteinases from various strains of Streptococcus cremoris on bovine α s1-, β- and κ-casein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986;52:1162–1166. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.5.1162-1166.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wakai T, Yamamoto N. Antihypertensive peptides specific to Lactobacillus helveticus fermented milk. In: Sammour RH, editor. Chapter 10 in biotechnology—molecular studies and novel applications for improved quality of human life. Rijeka: InTech Europe; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang J, Su Y, Jia F, Jin H. Characterization of casein hydrolysates derived from enzymatic hydrolysis. Chem Cent J. 2013;7:62. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Waśko A, Szwajgier D, Polak-Berecka M. The role of ferulic acid esterase in the growth of Lactobacillus helveticus in the presence of phenolic acids and their derivatives. Euro Food Res Technol. 2014;238:236–299. [Google Scholar]
  38. Xing G, Pan D, Tong M, Zeng X. Purification and characterization of cell-envelope proteinase from Lactobacillus casei DI-1. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;84:15060–15067. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES