Skip to main content
PMC home page
European Journal of Psychotraumatology logoLink to European Journal of Psychotraumatology
. 2017 Sep 13;8(1):1369832. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1369832

Posttraumatic growth and recovery from addiction

Eyal Haroosh a, Sara Freedman a,✉
PMCID: PMC5632763  PMID: 29038678

ABSTRACT

Background: It is well documented that individuals coping with adverse events report both negative outcomes, such as posttraumatic stress symptoms, as well as positive changes, described as posttraumatic growth. Positive changes are also reported in people who have recovered from substance abuse. It seems plausible from the literature that both of these types of positive changes have elements in common. To date, no published studies have examined positive outcomes among people who have recovered from addiction.

Objectives: In this study, posttraumatic growth in individuals who were formerly addicted to alcohol or substances, termed ‘addiction-related growth,’ was examined. Addiction-related growth refers to the growth that an individual undergoes as a result of the addiction itself, and the recovery from the addiction. A successful recovery from addiction is associated with positive changes, particularly regarding spirituality and meaning-making, and the construct of addiction-related growth may explain why.

Method: This cross-sectional study examined growth among 104 individuals who had recovered from addiction who were recruited from addiction treatment programmes, between February and July 2012. Questionnaires assessed demographics and substance abuse use and treatment, posttraumatic growth (PTGI); social support (Perceived Social Support Questionnaire); and help-seeking (Willingness to Seek Help Scale). Data was analysed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlations, and multiple regression.

Results: Results indicated that addiction-related growth is a phenomenon that accurately captures the positive changes experienced as a result of an individual’s struggle with addiction and recovery. This growth was found to be associated with participation in 12-steps programmes, and to be predicted by levels of perceived social support.

Conclusions: The results show that recovery from addiction is associated with addiction-related growth. These positive changes, along with the importance of communal social support, resemble the changes that take place as a result of processes described in 12-steps programmes.

KEYWORDS: Addiction-related growth, recovery, social support

1. Introduction

Positive psychology emphasizes the adaptive ways in which individuals interact with their environment (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000), and a growing literature has in recent years examined the positive impact of coping with extremely difficult events. Studies have shown that 30–70% of individuals report positive outcomes subsequent to a traumatic event (Linley & Joseph, 2004). Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is a result of the process of change that takes place in the aftermath of challenging events (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004) and has been reported after traumatic events such as sexual assault (Grubaugh & Resick, 2007), medical conditions such as cancer or HIV, and even significant positive life events, such as becoming a parent (Ben-Ari, Shlomo, Sivan, & Dolizki, 2009).

A separate body of studies regarding addiction have shown that traumatic events are related to the use of drugs, the likelihood of becoming dependent on them, and the process of recovery from addiction. Before, during, and after the use of drugs (i.e. in recovery), individuals are likely to experience many potentially traumatic events. In addition, the struggle with recovery is in and of itself a daunting challenge (Fullilove et al., 1993).

However, some of the literature on substance abuse pertains to the positive changes wrought by this abuse. As studies have shown that a feeling of existential emptiness may contribute to the initial use of drugs (Roos, Kirouac, Pearson, Fink, & Witkiewitz, 2015), it is perhaps not surprising that increased faith and spiritual levels have been shown to be related to one’s recovery from substance abuse (Jarusiewicz, 1999). Some substance abuse treatment programmes, particularly the 12-steps programmes, emphasize many aspects of personal growth, such as the need for faith (Minehan, Newcomb, & Galaif, 2000) and the adoption of daily spiritual activities. These are seen as allowing the individual to disengage from any discomfort (Dermatis & Galanter, 2016). From this perspective, recovery is seen as requiring the adoption of a new way of life that is meant to sustain this recovery, manifested in changes in lifestyle, habits, values, and gradual spiritual growth. It should also be said that social support has been found to be essential for recovery, particularly from individuals who themselves are recovered from former addiction (Subbaraman, Kaskutas, & Zemore, 2011). Social support therefore should be defined as including both perceived social support – on the individual level – as well as active giving support to others and receiving support from others – on the group level. This latter type of support, that is typical in substance abuse programmes, is perhaps an example of communal coping, where a group or community recognizes a problem as a shared issue that requires joint coping (Rossetto, 2015).

The changes that an individual needs to make during recovery, in terms of spirituality and values, echo PTG. The process of change, via the individual’s receipt of social support from others who have experienced similar challenges, is also reminiscent of the PTG model. As such, it seems likely that PTG might be a relevant concept for those recovering from substance abuse. As far as the authors of the current study are aware, only one unpublished study has examined posttraumatic growth among this population. In that study, individuals who had recovered from addiction were shown to have rates of PTG (or, as they termed it, addiction-related growth) that are similar to those of people who experienced traumatic events (Washton, 2007).

The current study attempts to further the knowledge in this area by way of examining PTG as well as two other factors that are related both to successful recovery and to PTG – social support and willingness to seek help (Bischof, Rumpf, Meyer, Hapke, & John, 2007; Grella & Stein, 2013) – among a population of people who had recovered from addiction. The study also assesses whether participation in 12-steps programmes, with their emphasis on spiritual change, is related to PTG. The study hypothesized that increased participation in NA/AA (measured by frequency of attendance, 12-steps programme participation, and work as a sponsor), as well as length of abstinence, social support, and willingness to seek help would be related to higher levels of PTG.

2. Method

2.1. Participants

Subjects were 104 individuals who were formerly addicted who were currently participating in addiction treatment programmes. These programmes help individuals whose primary issue is addiction; individuals who have comorbidity with a psychiatric diagnosis were excluded as they are treated in different centres. Inclusion criteria were attendance at one of these treatment programmes. The subjects included 89 men (86%), 11 women (11%), and four individuals (3.8%) who did not specify their gender. Twenty-six (25%) were married, 33 (31.7%) were single, 37(35.6%) were divorced, and three (2.9%) were widowed or separated. Subjects’ ages ranged from 21 to 62 years of age (mean age 40.2). All subjects were Israeli nationals, with 52.8% born in Israel; the remainder were immigrants, with 34.6% born in the former Soviet Union, 3.8% born in Europe or America, and 3.8% born in Asia and Africa.

2.2. Data collection

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University and the Division of Research of the Ministry of Social Affairs, and was conducted between February and July 2012. The researcher (EH) contacted administrators at public health service addiction treatment centres throughout Israel, and received permission to carry out the study. Questionnaires were then distributed to participants in a group setting.

2.3. Materials

Measures were administered either in Hebrew or Russian, depending on the participant’s first language. All questionnaires were translated into Hebrew and Russian, and back-translated.

2.3.1. Demographic and background information

Information regarding gender, age, marital status, and birthplace was gathered. In addition, items covered substance use, addiction recovery, treatment, and level of involvement in Narcotics Anonymous/Alcoholics Anonymous (NA/AA). Substance abuse was assessed by asking participants which substances they had used that impacted them. Recovery was assessed by asking participants about time periods they considered themselves clean. Both these variables were assessed subjectively.

2.3.1.1. Willingness to seek help scale (Cohen, 2016)

This 30-item questionnaire consists of three parts: the individual’s recognition of the existence of a problem s/he cannot cope with alone; his/her willingness to share this problem with another person; his/her willingness to hand over some of the control of his/her life to someone else. Questions are scored on a 4-point score, 0 to 3. Cronbach’s alpha for the current study was 0.75.

2.3.1.2. Perceived social support questionnaire (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, & Farley, 1988)

This 12-item questionnaire examines the perception of social support relating to three sources of support: family, friends, and significant others. Items are answered on a 7-point scale, 1 to 7. Cronbach’s alpha for the current study was 0.805.

2.3.1.3. Posttraumatic growth inventory (PTGI, Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996)

This is a 21-item questionnaire relating to the change experienced by a person since the time of the traumatic event, and is divided into five dimensions: (1) a recognition of new possibilities in life and changing priorities; (2) changing relationships with others; (3) attributing meaning to the personal strength of the body; (4) personal and spiritual development, and (5) a greater appreciation of life. Questions are answered on a 6-point scale, 1 to 6. Cronbach’s alpha for the current study was 0.92.

2.4. Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version No. 21. Differences between groups were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relationships between the study variables were calculated using Pearson correlations. The relative contribution of each variable to explain the variance of posttraumatic growth was calculated using a stepwise multiple regression.

3. Results

3.1. Substance abuse

As can be seen in Table 1, a wide range of substances had been abused, with most participants reporting their use of more than one substance. In addition, the majority had participated in NA or AA, two to three times per week. Table 1 also presents statistics regarding recovery from substance abuse. Half of the participants had participated in a 12-steps programme, although most had not been sponsors. The majority reported the current period of being drug-free as the first significant period of remission.

Table 1.

Substance abuse and recovery.

    N (%)
Substance Alcohol 67 (66.3)
  Marijuana 75 (74.3)
  LSD and/or Ecstasy 53 (51)
  Sleeping pills 41 (40.6)
  Energy pills 36 (35.6)
  Heroin, opium and coke 66 (65.3)
  Cocaine and crack 60 (60.6)
  Other 49 (49.5)
Participated in NA or AA Yes 85 (81.7)
Frequency of participation in NA or AA Once a month 8 (9.8)
  Once a fortnight 20 (24.4)
  2–3 times per week 42 (51.2)
  Almost every day 12 (14.6)
12-steps programme Yes 51 (50)
Sponsor Yes 22 (21.4)
  No 81 (78.6)
Significant period/s of being clean 0 2 (2)
  First 59 (59.6)
  Second 22 (22.2)
  Third 9 (9.1)
  Four or more 7 (7.1)
Open in a new tab

Correlations between study variables are shown in Table 2; as can be seen, PTG (M = 99.88, SD = 17.57) was significantly correlated with frequency of NA/AA attendance (M = 2.24, SD = 1.28; p = .002), help-seeking, (M = 1.81, SD = 0.29, p = .011), and social support (M = 4.91, SD = 1.06, p = .00) but not length of abstinence.

Table 2.

Correlations.

  PTGI Abstinence length NA.AA frequency Help seeking Social support
PTGI 1 .125 .313a .259b .467a
Abstinence length   1 −.001 −.060 .035
NA AA frequency     1 .169 .231b
Help seeking       1 .244b
Social support         1
Open in a new tab

aCorrelation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). bCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

An analysis of variance compared those who had participated in a 12-steps programme (N = 50) with those who had not (N = 50). Participants in 12-steps programmes had been abstinent significantly longer, F(1,98) = 7.70, p = .007, ηp 2 = .07; reported significantly higher social support, F(1,90) = 7.005, p = .01, ηp 2 = .06; and showed higher PTG in the new possibilities subscale, F(1,85) = 6.59, p = .01, ηp 2 = .07, and the spiritual change subscale, F(1,91) = 11.85, p = .001, ηp 2 = .11.

Participants who had served as a sponsor (N = 20) were compared with those who had not served as a sponsor (N = 81) in regard to length of abstinence, PTG subscales, help-seeking, and social support. A one-way ANOVA showed that sponsors, as compared with those who had not taken on this role, had been abstinent significantly longer, F(1,99) = 32.92, p = .00, ηp 2 = .25, and reported significantly higher levels of PTG in three subscales: personal strength, F(1,914) = 4.1, p = .04, ηp 2 = .04; spiritual change, F(1,92) = 6.29, p = .01, ηp 2 = .06; and appreciation of life, F(1,92) = 7.94, p = .006, ηp 2 = .07.

To test the hypothesis that the total level of PTG was a function of frequency of NA/AA meeting attendance, 12-steps programme participation, acting as a sponsor, length of abstinence, help-seeking, and social support, a multiple regression analysis was performed. The results of the regression indicated that social support explained 21.8% of the variance in PTG (adj R2 = .218, F(6,79) = 4.9, p < .01; beta = 0.4, p < .01), no other variables were significant.

4. Discussion

This study examined posttraumatic growth in treatment seeking patients who had been addicted to alcohol or substances. The results support the existence of addiction-related growth, replicating the findings of the one previous study that was conducted on this subject (Washton, 2007). Although growth has often been found to occur in the aftermath of various traumatic, stressful, and life-changing events, the results of the current study suggest that addiction recovery might be an additional antecedent for such growth.

The path to recovery following addiction has been thoroughly studied and described, and successful recovery from addictions has been found to be associated with changes in priorities and increased self-awareness (McMillen, Howard, Nower, & Chung, 2001). Participation in self-help groups includes a number of processes and mechanisms of change that support the individual while s/he remains drug-free, and the intent of these processes is to assist the individual in maintaining his/her personal growth. Twelve-steps programmes emphasize the belief that recovery from addiction is a spiritual journey.

This study showed that greater frequency of participation in self-help addiction-recovery programmes was significantly correlated with PTG levels. Participants in 12-steps programmes reported a more successful recovery – in terms of length of abstinence – as well as higher levels of spiritual growth and the ability to recognize and consider new possibilities in life. Acting as a sponsor was also related to greater length of abstinence, spiritual growth, personal strength, and appreciation of life. Taken together, these findings confirm the study hypotheses and demonstrate that greater participation in self-help programmes, with their emphasis on growth, is related to greater PTG.

When an individual enters a self-help programme, s/he is by definition seeking help, and indeed help-seeking is seen as a key element – perhaps even the initial element – of these programmes. Seeking help indicates a readiness to accept assistance and a basic commitment to undergo change; by contrast, a reluctance to seek help is interpreted as a wish to deny the existence of a problem and a lack of motivation to change (Grella & Stein, 2013). In this study, help-seeking was positively correlated with PTG.

The major finding of this study regards the relationship found between social support and posttraumatic growth: i.e. social support increases as PTG increases, and it is the only significant predictor of PTG. Social support for traumatized individuals, particularly from other individuals who have experienced similar traumatic events, is a key concept in PTG development, and there is clear evidence that it helps mitigate the negative effects of traumatic events (Andrews, Brewin, & Rose, 2003). In line with these findings, social support has been shown to be related to PTG among cancer patients (Schroevers, Helgeson, Sanderman, & Ranchor, 2010) and among child survivors of World War II (Lev-Wiesel & Amir, 2003). The results reported here highlight another aspect of social support: communal support. Instead of understanding social support as something that happens on an individual level, communal support emphasizes the importance of conceptualizing a problem as something shared by a group or community, which is tackled by the group; communal support is a key feature of substance abuse programmes. Communal support has been shown to be related to levels of posttraumatic growth in flood survivors (Wlodarczyk et al., 2016), and individuals who survived armed conflict and participated to communal rites showed lower levels of PTSD and higher levels of growth (Gasparre, Bosco, & Bellelli, 2010).

As in the treatment of post-trauma victims, social support is also a key element in addiction treatment programmes. Individuals who are addicted come to understand that ‘loneliness is an enemy,’ and learn to give up the addictive substance in favour of intimacy, intimate interpersonal relationships, and trust (Ronel, 1995). Help giving is as important as receiving help. In summary, the findings indicate that addiction-related growth is one of the positive effects of recovery from addiction. The findings also reinforce the idea that social support is crucial in the process of withdrawal and recovery from substance abuse. It seems that these positive processes, long recognized by participants in 12-steps programmes, have a theoretical foundation in posttraumatic growth.

This study has several limitations. The research tools used may not have been optimal: the willingness to seek help scale is long, and it was difficult for the participants to complete. Additional information regarding background variables were omitted. In addition, the sample was a convenience sample, and was made up of a large preponderance of individuals who took part in NA/AA programmes and came from public care settings. As both groups receive a great deal of social support, in comparison with others recovering from addiction, the results found here should be replicated among a more heterogeneous group.

A third limitation is related to the reliability of research findings. Like many other studies on posttraumatic growth (Nishi, Matsuoka, & Kim, 2010), this study is based solely on self-report questionnaires and – as self-reports do not take into account subjects’ wish to please – the results may not reflect the reality of the situation in its entirety. Lastly, additional information regarding the subjects’ backgrounds, such as length of residence in Israel and social economic status, were not collected. Future studies would be well advised to consider the use of objective measures, such as urine tests, as well as staff evaluations.

5. Conclusions

This study indicates that although addiction, and recovery from addiction, are processes that are related to adversity, they can also result in positive psychological outcomes. Addiction-related growth as a concept allows for a better understanding of these positive changes, and how they are related to social support and treatment type. Finally, 12-steps programmes may yield positive results, due to their emphasis on social support.

Funding Statement

This study received no funding.

Highlights

  • Posttraumatic growth follows negative experiences

  • Positive outcomes have been described in recovery of substance abuse

  • Posttraumatic growth has not been previously examined in individuals who have recovered from addiction

  • These results show that posttraumatic growth is a relevant concept for individuals who have recovered from addiction

  • Social support is related to levels of posttraumatic growth in individuals who have recovered from addiction

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was given by the Ethics Committee of the School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, and the Division of Research of the Ministry of Social Affairs, Israel.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Andrews B., Brewin C. R., & Rose S. (2003). Gender, social support, and PTSD in victims of violent crime. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 421–6. doi: 10.1023/A:1024478305142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Ari O. T., Shlomo S. B., Sivan E., & Dolizki M. (2009). The transition to motherhood—a time for growth. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 943–970. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2009.28.8.943 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bischof G., Rumpf H. J., Meyer C., Hapke U., & John U. (2007). Stability of subtypes of natural recovery from alcohol dependence after two years. Addiction, 102(6), 904–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01834.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen B. (2016, November). Measuring the willingness to seek help. 8376. doi: 10.1300/J079v26n01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dermatis H., & Galanter M. (2016). The role of twelve-step-related spirituality in addiction recovery. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(2), 510–521. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0019-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fullilove M. T., Fullilove R. E., Winkler K., Michael C., Panzer P. G., & Wallaco R. (1993). Violence, trauma, and post. Traumatic Stress Disorder Among Women Drug Users, 6(4), 533–543. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gasparre A., Bosco S., & Bellelli G. (2010). Cognitive and social consequences of participation in social rituals: Collective coping, social support, and posttraumatic growth in the victims of Guatemala genocide. International Journal of Social Psychology [Revista de Psicología Social], 25, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Grella C. E., & Stein J. A. (2013). Remission from substance dependence: Differences between individuals in a general population longitudinal survey who do and do not seek help. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133(1), 146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grubaugh A. L., & Resick P. A. (2007). Posttraumatic growth in treatment-seeking female assault victims. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78, 145–155. doi: 10.1007/s11126-006-9034-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jarusiewicz B. P. (1999). Spirituality and addiction: Relationship to religion, abuse, gender, and multichemical use. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 59, 5781. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lev-Wiesel R., & Amir M. (2003). Posttraumatic growth among holocaust child survivors. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 8, 229–237. doi: 10.1080/15325020305884 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Linley P. A., & Joseph S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11–21. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McMillen C., Howard M. O., Nower L., & Chung S. (2001). Positive by-products of the struggle with chemical dependency. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(00)00151-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Minehan J. A., Newcomb M. D., & Galaif E. R. (2000). Predictors of adolescent drug use: Cognitive abilities, coping strategies, and purpose in life. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 10(2), 33–52. doi: 10.1300/J029v10n02_04 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nishi D., Matsuoka Y., & Kim Y. (2010). Posttraumatic growth, posttraumatic stress disorder and resilience of motor vehicle accident survivors. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 4, 7. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-4-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ronel, N (1995). Narcotic Anonymous in Israel: The process of self-help and religious beliefs among drug addicts (PhD dissertation). The Israel Anti Drug Authority, Jerusalem. [Google Scholar]
  17. Roos C. R., Kirouac M., Pearson M. R., Fink B. C., & Witkiewitz K. (2015). Examining temptation to drink from an existential perspective : Associations among temptation. Purpose in Life, and Drinking Outcomes, 29(3), 716–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rossetto K. R. (2015). Developing conceptual definitions and theoretical models of coping in military families during deployment. Journal of Family Communication, 15(3), 249–268. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1043737 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schroevers M. J., Helgeson V. S., Sanderman R., & Ranchor A. V. (2010). Type of social support matters for prediction of posttraumatic growth among cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 46–53. doi: 10.1002/pon.1501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Seligman M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Subbaraman M. S., Kaskutas L., & Zemore S. (2011). Sponsorship and service as mediators of the effects of Making Alcoholics Anonymous Easier (MAAEZ), a 12-step facilitation intervention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 116(1–3), 117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tedeschi R. G., & Calhoun L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8827649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tedeschi R. G., & Calhoun L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1501 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Washton L. J. (2007). The silver lining in the clouds: Factors influencing addiction-related growth. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304705455?accountid=14553%5Cnhttp://openurl.library.uiuc.edu/sfxlcl3?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+&+theses&sid=ProQ:ProQuest+Dissertations+&+Theses+Full+Text&atitle=
  25. Wlodarczyk A., Basabe N., Páez D., Amutio A., García F., Villagrán L., & Reyes C. (2016). Positive effects of communal coping in the aftermath of a collective trauma: The case of 2010 chilean earthquake. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 9(1), 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.08.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zimet G. D., Dahlem N. W., Zimet S. G., & Farley G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Psychotraumatology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES