Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Sep 4;274(11):3993–3996. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4729-y

Early results of a safety and feasibility clinical trial of a novel single-port flexible robot for transoral robotic surgery

Jason Y K Chan 1,, Eddy W Y Wong 1, Raymond K Tsang 2, F Christopher Holsinger 3, Michael C F Tong 1, Philip W Y Chiu 4, Simon S M Ng 4
PMCID: PMC5633617  PMID: 28871410

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the early results of a phase 1 safety and feasibility clinical trial of the first clinical use of a novel robot for transoral robotic surgery (TORS)—the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Study design of this study is prospective clinical trial. The methods used in this study are prospective innovation, development, exploration, assessment, and long-term study phase 1 clinical trial. Early results of six patients underwent TORS with the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) demonstrate access the nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. There were no conversions of the robotic surgical system. There were no serious adverse events or adverse events related to the use of the robot at 30-day follow-up for all six patients. The early results of this safety and feasibility trial of the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) clearly demonstrate that the device is safe and that it is feasible in performing TORS to access the nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4729-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Flexible robot; Transoral robotic surgery, TORS; da Vinci; Clinical trial; Transoral

Introduction

Since the first description of a novel, flexible, single-arm robotic surgical system (da Vinci SP Surgical system, Model SP999; Intuitive Surgical Inc.) was first evaluated clinically in 2010 on 19 patients undergoing urological surgery [1]. Further technical refinements have been developed in this robotic system with recent publications containing a detailed description of the current design of the robot and cadaveric applications in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) [2, 3]. In brief, this next generation system incorporates a stereoscopic binocular camera and three 6 mm flexible instruments in a cannula of 2.5 cm diameter. The flexible robotic arms allow the instruments to be deployed from the oral cavity to the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. Here, we describe the early results of the first ever clinical investigation into the feasibility and safety of this updated flexible single-arm robot, da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc.), in TORS.

Methods

Study design

This was a prospective institutional review board approved, innovation, development, exploration, assessment, long-term study (IDEAL) phase 1 clinical trial conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki under the institutional review board and local regulatory body approval of The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The study was registered on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03010813).

Study population

Both benign and malignant lesions of the head and neck were included with the first six cases, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographics, diagnosis, and procedure of the first six cases for transoral robotic surgery utilizing the da Vinci SP

Case Gender Age Previous radiotherapy Diagnosis Procedure Retractor Time to exposure (min) Time to dock robot (min) Estimated blood loss (ml)
1 M 72 Yes Tongue base papilloma TORS excision of the tongue base CD 16 3 5
2 F 52 Yes Second primary T1 oropharyngeal SCC TORS examination under anaesthesia of the OP and NP Dingman 10 4 5
3 M 53 Yes Recurrent T2 Supraglottic Carcinoma TORS examination under anaesthesia of the larynx CD 43 1 0
4 M 75 Yes Pharyngeal stricture TORS dilatation of pharyngeal stricture CD 4 3 10
5 M 64 No Supraglottic inflammatory mass TORS excision of supraglottis FK 35 5 50
6 M 54 No Unknown primary SCC, P16 +ve TORS excision of the tongue base CD 20 4 20

M male, F female, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, OP oropharynx, NP nasopharynx, CD Crowe–Davis, FK Feyh–Kastenbauer

Study endpoints

Primary endpoint included conversion rates and perioperative complications within 30 days following surgery. Secondary endpoints included operative time, blood loss, and pain scores as documented with a visual analogue scale.

Statistical analysis

The Fisher’s exact test and Mann–Whitney U test will be used to compare categorical, and non-parametric data for the trial. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Among the first six enrolled patients, there were no conversions to alternative surgical approaches. Figures 1, 2 show the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) being utilized in case 3 to examine the larynx (Supplementary video 1). The procedures underwent are listed in Table 1, demonstrating that with the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) we could reach the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx utilizing even just a simple daily Crowe–Davis retractor. The main use of time was in obtaining adequate exposure with the initial use of the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), mean 21.3 min (range 4–43 min). The initial time to dock the robot was negligible with a mean of 3.3 min (range 1–5 min). There were no conversions of the robotic surgical system. Mean visual analogue scale pain scores preoperatively, at 2 week and 30 day postop, were 0.16 (range 0–1), 0.67 (range 0–4), and 0.16 (range 0–1). There were no serious adverse events or adverse events related to the use of the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). There were surgical complications in two patients unrelated to the robot use. Case number four, a patient who had previous radiotherapy and poor dentition had a fractured right lower molar that required a dental consultation. Case number five had a 1 cm laceration of the tongue from the mouthgag that resolved by itself on follow-up visits.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

da Vinci SP in use for examination of the supraglottis with the camera arm and all three instrument arms deployed transorally as seen in the insetted figure. The mouth is opened and suspended with a Crowe–Davis mouthgag. The cannula is located about 10 cm from the oral opening

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

da Vinci SP in use for examination of the supraglottis through an internal view. The monopolar spatula tip is seen on the left, the Maryland bipolars are opened at the right aryepiglottic fold exposing the tumor, while the fenestrated bipolar is retracting the epiglottis superiorly. The insetted figure shows the assistant holding a Yankaur suction and the location of the port about 10 cm from the oral opening

Discussion

The early results of this safety and feasibility trial of the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) clearly demonstrate that the device is safe and that it is feasible in performing transoral surgery to access the nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharyngeal region. This has been achieved in a predominantly Southern Chinese population despite significantly different, in particular smaller cranio-facial measurements as compared to Caucasians [4].

A significant advantage offered by the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is the option to use three instruments to perform transoral endoscopic surgery. The working space within the instruments and camera is roughly the size of a tennis ball. This third arm replaces the need of an assistant to provide traction and counter traction and allows the surgeon to control these maneuvers to better dissect critical neurovascular structures. Other distinct advantages include the flexible camera enabled with digital zoom that allows magnification and easier visualization of lesions and the different compartments of the pharynx.

There are some limitations to the system; now, with the extra arm, there is less working space for an assistant to, in particular, aid with suction. However, this can be largely overcome with a suction catheter placed through the nasal cavity into the desired location. Another limitation is the lack of bone instrumentation to resect, in particular tumors of the nasopharynx and skull base.

Conclusion

The early results of the use of the novel single-port flexible robotic system, the da Vinci SP (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale CA, USA) demonstrate that the device is safe and feasible to use for TORS to access the nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Paul Lilagan, Michael Ikeda, Christie Draper, Melanie Yuan, Holly Liske, and the da Vinci SP Engineering Team.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

Jason Y. K. Chan, Eddy W. Y. Wong, Raymond K. Tsang, and Simon S. M. Ng received travel grants from Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there is no competing interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong—New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research ethics committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was registered on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03010813).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-017-4729-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, et al. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol. 2014;66(6):1033–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holsinger FC. A flexible, single-arm robotic surgical system for transoral resection of the tonsil and lateral pharyngeal wall: next-generation robotic head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(4):864–869. doi: 10.1002/lary.25724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tsang RK, Holsinger FC. Transoral endoscopic nasopharyngectomy with a flexible next-generation robotic surgical system. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(10):2257–2262. doi: 10.1002/lary.25970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee RW, Vasudavan S, Hui DS, et al. Differences in craniofacial structures and obesity in caucasian and Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 2010;33(8):1075–1080. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.8.1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES