Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Aug 7;32(11):1591–1596. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2853-1

Socioeconomic characteristics and comorbidities of diverticular disease in Sweden 1997–2012

Maziar Nikberg 1,2,, Jianguang Ji 3, Jerzy Leppert 2,4, Kristina Sundquist 3, Abbas Chabok 1,2
PMCID: PMC5635093  PMID: 28785818

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the association of socioeconomic status and comorbidities with uncomplicated and complicated diverticular disease (DD) in Sweden.

Methods

We identified all individuals aged ≥30 years in Sweden diagnosed with DD between 1997 and 2012 using the Swedish National Population and Housing Census and the Hospital Discharge Register. Data were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression, with individual-level characteristics as covariates.

Results

A total of 79,481 patients (median age 66 [range 30–86] years) were hospitalized for DD, 15,878 (20%) of whom for complicated DD. Admissions for both uncomplicated and complicated DD were more common in women (p < 0.001). A low education level was identified as a risk factor for uncomplicated (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75–1.82; adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.19–1.24) and complicated DD (unadjusted HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.77–1.92; adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21–1.32). Patients with the lowest income had a lower risk of hospitalization for uncomplicated (adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91–0.96) and complicated DD (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) than those with the highest income. The correlation coefficient between income and education was 0.25. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease were identified as protective factors against uncomplicated DD (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66–0.69 and HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74–0.84, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients with the lowest education level had an increased risk of hospitalization for DD. Further studies are needed to explore the association of diabetes and cardiovascular disease with uncomplicated DD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00384-017-2853-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Diverticular disease, Socioeconomic status, Education, Income, Comorbidity

Introduction

The clinical burden of colonic diverticular disease (DD) is impressive. It is responsible for 312,000 hospital admissions per year in the USA alone, with the incidence of acute diverticulitis increasing and the average age of the patients declining. The severity of the disease varies, and DD presents with a wide spectrum of symptoms ranging from acute uncomplicated to complicated DD [1].

The etiopathogenesis of DD is not well clarified. Epidemiological studies have analyzed the associations between DD and obesity, smoking, alcohol intake, and physical activity [2, 3]. In addition, comorbidities and the use of specific medications can influence the risk of DD. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids have been shown to be a risk factor for complicated and uncomplicated DD, while cardiovascular disease has been found to be a risk factor for complicated DD [35]. Socioeconomic variables such as education, income, and access to healthcare have been shown to influence the severity of a range of medical conditions [610]. Socioeconomic characteristics such as education, income, and urbanization, together with comorbidities and in addition to known risk factors such as sex and age, may also explain the risk of hospitalization for both uncomplicated and complicated DD.

The relationship of socioeconomic characteristics and comorbidity with disease is of special interest in Sweden, where access to healthcare is equal for all residents, and differences in socioeconomic status (SES) are less apparent compared with many other countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of SES and comorbidities with uncomplicated and complicated DD in Sweden.

Methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Lund University, Sweden. All individuals ≥30 years of age living in Sweden in 1997 were included. The data sources used included the Swedish National Population and Housing Census, the Total Population Register, and the Hospital Discharge Register. Access to these registers was provided by Statistics Sweden and the National Board of Health and Welfare. The Swedish Hospital Discharge Register, which was created by the National Board of Health and Welfare in 1964, contains hospital discharge records for all residents of Sweden. From 1987 onwards, the register includes complete nationwide data with information on dates of admission and discharge, together with principal causes of hospitalization [11]. Data in these registers were linked using individual lifetime personal identification numbers assigned to all people living in Sweden. These numbers were replaced with serial numbers to maintain anonymity.

Outcome variable

DD was identified from the Hospital Discharge Register according to the tenth revision of the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10 from 1997 onwards). Only principal diagnoses of DD were considered to ensure high validity. Complicated DD was defined as ICD-10 codes K572, K574, and K578, where uncomplicated DD was defined as ICD-10 codes K573, K575, and K579.

Predictor variables

The SES variables, individual disposable income and years of education in 1997, were identified from the Total Population Register. Individual disposable income was categorized as lowest, middle-low, middle-high, and highest according to the quartile range. Years of education were categorized as 0–9, 10–11, and ≥12.

Adjustment variables

Adjustments were made for sex, age (30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80+), geographic region of residence (large cities, mid-sized cities, and small cities), and comorbidities (inpatient diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis [RA]/systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]). Comorbidities were defined by the following ICD-10 codes: I00–I99 (cardiovascular diseases), M32, M05, and M06 (RA/SLE), E10–E14 (diabetes), and J40–J47 (COPD). Geographic region of residence was included to adjust for possible regional differences in hospital admissions. Large cities were defined as cities with a population of >200,000 and comprised the three largest cities in Sweden: Stockholm, Gothenburg, and Malmö. Small cities were defined as cities with a population of <90,000.

Statistical analysis

Cox regression models were applied to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for admission to hospital with a diagnosis of uncomplicated or complicated DD. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed including the selected demographic characteristics (age, sex, and geographic region of residence) and comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, RA/SLE, and COPD). All of these confounding factors were defined at baseline. We censored individuals (that is, we treated them as no longer under observation or at risk of the study outcome) at the time of death from any cause, at the end of the follow-up period (December 31, 2012), or at the time of emigration. Data are accurate to two decimal places. A multivariable Cox regression analysis stratified by age was also performed with a cutoff of 65 years. The temporal trend for DD was calculated separately for different age groups. We also tested the polychoric correlation between income and education. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Of 79,481 patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of DD, 15,878 (20%) were admitted for complicated DD. The median age for patients with both uncomplicated and complicated DD was 66.0 (range 30–86) years. The age distribution for uncomplicated and complicated DD was the same for both sexes. Admission for uncomplicated (64%) and complicated (61%) DD was more common in women than in men (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Uncomplicated and complicated diverticular disease in Sweden between 1997 and 2012

Subtype Uncomplicated Complicated Total
No. % No. % No.
Total 63,603 1.19 15,878 0.30 5,325,811
Age (years)
 30–39 6567 0.54 1560 0.13 1,220,826
 40–49 11,529 0.97 2797 0.24 1,189,676
 50–59 14,952 1.31 3908 0.34 1,137,815
 60–69 13,444 1.71 3522 0.45 786,630
 70–79 13,167 1.88 3155 0.45 701,505
 80+ 3944 1.36 936 0.32 289,359
Sex
 Men 22,654 0.87 6175 0.24 2,602,304
 Women 40,949 1.50 9703 0.36 2,723,507
Education (years)
 ≤9 27,538 1.43 6969 0.36 1,927,780
 10–11 19,664 1.21 4895 0.30 1,622,085
 12+ 16,401 0.92 4014 0.23 1,775,946
Income
 Lowest 12,943 1.02 3070 0.24 1,272,026
 Middle-low 16,836 1.28 4157 0.32 1,318,012
 Middle-high 17,518 1.28 4468 0.33 1,365,639
 Highest 16,306 1.19 4183 0.31 1,370,134
Region
 Large cities 8808 1.03 2391 0.28 851,816
 Mid-sized cities 21,876 1.20 5356 0.29 1,826,708
 Small cities 32,919 1.24 8131 0.31 2,647,287
Cardiovascular disease
 No 49,116 1.21 10,784 0.27 4,058,948
 Yes 14,487 1.14 5094 0.40 1,266,863
Diabetes
 No 62,674 1.20 15,553 0.30 5,226,323
 Yes 929 0.93 325 0.33 99,488
Rheumatoid arthritis/systemic lupus erythematosus
 No 62,960 1.19 15,484 0.29 5,296,627
 Yes 643 2.20 394 1.35 29,184
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma
 No 62,095 1.19 15,252 0.29 5,227,515
 Yes 1508 1.53 626 0.64 98,296

Cardiovascular disease, RA/SLE, and asthma/COPD were more common in patients with complicated than in those with uncomplicated DD (32 vs. 23%, 2.5 vs. 1%, and 3.9 vs. 2.9%; p < 0.001 for all) (Table 1).

In the univariable analysis, a low level of education was identified as a risk factor for uncomplicated and complicated DD (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.75–1.82 and HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.77–1.92, respectively). Those with the lowest income had a lower risk of hospital admission for uncomplicated and complicated DD (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87–0.92 and HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.79–0.86, respectively) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Hazard ratios of uncomplicated and complicated diverticular disease by socioeconomic status

Subtype Uncomplicated Complicated
Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Education (years)
 12+ 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 10–11 1.34 1.31 1.37 1.24 1.21 1.27 1.36 1.31 1.42 1.27 1.22 1.33
 ≤9 1.79 1.75 1.82 1.22 1.19 1.24 1.84 1.77 1.92 1.26 1.21 1.32
Income
 Lowest 0.89 0.87 0.92 0.94 0.91 0.96 0.82 0.79 0.86 0.87 0.83 0.92
 Middle-low 1.16 1.14 1.19 1.03 1.00 1.05 1.12 1.07 1.17 0.98 0.94 1.03
 Middle-high 1.12 1.09 1.14 1.02 1.00 1.04 1.11 1.06 1.16 1.00 1.96 1.04
 Highest 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
Age (years)
 30–39 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 40–49 1.84 1.79 1.90 1.81 1.70 1.93
 50–59 2.60 2.52 2.68 2.55 2.40 2.71
 60–69 3.74 3.63 3.86 3.34 3.14 3.56
 70–79 5.34 5.17 5.51 4.04 3.78 4.32
 80+ 5.72 5.49 5.97 4.33 3.98 4.73
Sex
 Men 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Women 1.51 1.49 1.54 1.36 1.32 1.40
Region
 Large cities 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Mid-sized cities 1.13 1.10 1.16 1.01 0.96 1.06
 Small cities 1.14 1.12 1.17 1.02 0.98 1.07
Cardiovascular disease
 No 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Yes 0.68 0.66 0.69 1.14 1.10 1.18
Diabetes
 No 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Yes 0.79 0.74 0.84 0.96 0.86 1.08
Rheumatoid arthritis/systemic lupus erythematosus
 No 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Yes 1.53 1.42 1.66 3.60 3.26 3.98
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma
 No 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Yes 1.13 1.08 1.19 1.74 1.60 1.89

In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, age was identified as the strongest independent risk factor for both uncomplicated and complicated DD. The correlation between income and education in Sweden was tested using the polychoric correlation test, which gave a correlation coefficient of 0.25. Forty-one percent of individuals in the middle-high and highest income categories in Sweden had the lowest level of education. For both uncomplicated and complicated DD, female sex (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.49–1.54 and HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32–1.40), RA/SLE (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.42–1.66 and HR 3.60, 95% CI 3.26–3.98), COPD/asthma (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08–1.19 and HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.60–1.89), and low level of education (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.19–1.24 and HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21–1.32) were associated with increased risks. Residency in small cities was found to be a risk factor for uncomplicated DD (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.12–1.17). Patients with the lowest level of income had a lower risk of hospitalization for uncomplicated or complicated DD than those with the highest level of income (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91–0.96 and HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.92). Cardiovascular disease was identified as a protective factor against uncomplicated DD (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66–0.69), but as a risk factor for complicated DD (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10–1.18). Diabetes was identified as a protective factor against uncomplicated DD (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74–0.84) (Table 2).

In an additional multivariable logistic analysis stratified according to the general Swedish retirement age of 65 years, the identified risk factors including income did not differ from the results of the main analysis (Table S1).

Discussion

This population-based study based on the Swedish national inpatient register showed that patients with the lowest level of education had an increased risk of being hospitalized for DD. The most important risk factor for both uncomplicated and complicated DD was identified as increased age. Interestingly, patients with the highest income level had an increased risk for DD compared with those with the lowest income level, which was unexpected because a higher education level is usually associated with higher income. Because the retirement age in Sweden is 65 years, a separate multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the discrepancy between income and the risk of DD. However, in this analysis, higher income was still associated with an increased risk. This discrepancy could be explained by the low correlation (0.25) between high education and high income found in the general Swedish population.

A study from the USA reported that patients with a low SES were more often admitted to the emergency department with a diagnosis of DD, but it was unclear whether this DD had a complicated history [6]. Furthermore, the subcategories of SES were not presented. Substantial structural differences exist in health care between the USA and Sweden. In a previous study of a Swedish cohort focusing on migration, where SES was defined according to a classification used by Statistics Sweden that is based on occupation but also considers the educational level of the head of household’s occupation, type of production, and position at work, SES did not influence the risk of hospitalization for DD [12]. That study used ICD 9 to identify patients diagnosed with DD between 1991 and 1996 [12]. In ICD 9, in contrast to ICD10, it is not possible to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated DD. Furthermore, no adjustments were made for income or comorbidities. In the present study, when the analyses were adjusted for comorbidities, low education was still found to increase the risk of admission for both uncomplicated and complicated DD.

Patients with asthma/COPD and RA/SLE were found to have an increased risk of admission for DD, especially complicated DD. As previously suggested, this increased risk is probably because of treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppression [13, 14]. Patients with diabetes have been reported to present with more advanced DD [15]. However, in the present study, diabetes was not predictive of more severe DD, and surprisingly, both diabetes and cardiovascular disease were associated with a reduced risk of uncomplicated DD. Although one can speculate that medication or lifestyle changes may explain the protective effect of cardiovascular disease in uncomplicated DD, the mechanism of this effect is unknown and cannot be explained by the increased use of statins by patients with cardiovascular disease [16].

The retrospective design of the present study has some inherent limitations. Patients were included at their first admission with DD, and subsequent admissions were not considered. Furthermore, because of the large sample size (5.3 million), even small differences between the study groups may be statistically significant. However, the study does have several strengths, including the large number of patients who were diagnosed by clinicians and the use of ICD-10 coding, which is more precise compared with ICD-9. The diagnosis of DD is not always based on explicit criteria, but the increased use of CT in the acute setting should improve diagnostic accuracy. Another important key strength in the assessment of SES status is the avoidance of self-reporting. The novelty of this study is that we had access to SES measures individually linked with almost complete clinical data over a long time period.

Conclusion

The results of the present exploratory population-based study using the national inpatient register suggest that patients with the lowest level of education have an increased risk of being hospitalized for both uncomplicated and complicated DD. Future studies are needed to verify and explore the association between diabetes and cardiovascular disease with uncomplicated DD.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1 (20.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 20 kb)

Acknowledgments

Contributors

All authors made substantial contribution to the conception of the work including analysis and interpretation of the data. JJ and KS made substantial contribution for data acquisition. MN and AC drafted the work and all authors have critically revised the work. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and ensured the accuracy of the work.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Lund University, Sweden.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by grants to Dr. Kristina Sundquist from the Swedish Research Council (K2012-70X-15428-08-3), as well as ALF funding from Region Skåne. This work was also supported by grants awarded to Dr. Jianguang Ji by the Swedish Research Council (2016-02373) and by Crafoordska stiftelsen and ALF funding from Region Skåne.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00384-017-2853-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Etzioni DA, Mack TM, Beart RW, Jr, Kaiser AM. Diverticulitis in the United States: 1998–2005: changing patterns of disease and treatment. Ann Surg. 2009;249(2):210–217. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181952888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hjern F, Wolk A, Hakansson N. Obesity, physical inactivity, and colonic diverticular disease requiring hospitalization in women: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(2):296–302. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosemar A, Angeras U, Rosengren A. Body mass index and diverticular disease: a 28-year follow-up study in men. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(4):450–455. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Strate LL, Liu YL, Huang ES, Giovannucci EL, Chan AT. Use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases risk for diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(5):1427–1433. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weiner HL, Rezai AR, Cooper PR. Sigmoid diverticular perforation in neurosurgical patients receiving high-dose corticosteroids. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(1):40–43. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199307000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Csikesz NG, Singla A, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA. The impact of socioeconomic status on presentation and treatment of diverticular disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(11):1993–2001. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA. High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center? J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(10):1709–1716. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0627-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000;283(19):2579–2584. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.19.2579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Funakoshi M, Azami Y, Matsumoto H, Ikota A, Ito K, Okimoto H, Shimizu N, Tsujimura F, Fukuda H, Miyagi C, et al. Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes complications among young adult patients in Japan. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lutfiyya MN, Ng L, Asner N, Lipsky MS. Disparities in stroke symptomology knowledge among US midlife women: an analysis of population survey data. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;18(2):150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, Heurgren M, Olausson PO. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hjern F, Johansson C, Mellgren A, Baxter NN, Hjern A. Diverticular disease and migration—the influence of acculturation to a Western lifestyle on diverticular disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23(6):797–805. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hjern F, Mahmood MW, Abraham-Nordling M, Wolk A, Hakansson N. Cohort study of corticosteroid use and risk of hospital admission for diverticular disease. Br J Surg. 2015;102(1):119–124. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hwang SS, Cannom RR, Abbas MA, Etzioni D. Diverticulitis in transplant patients and patients on chronic corticosteroid therapy: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1699–1707. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f5643c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cologne KG, Skiada D, Beale E, Inaba K, Senagore AJ, Demetriades D. Effects of diabetes mellitus in patients presenting with diverticulitis: clinical correlations and disease characteristics in more than 1,000 patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):704–709. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Skoldberg F, Svensson T, Olen O, Hjern F, Schmidt PT, Ljung R. A population-based case-control study on statin exposure and risk of acute diverticular disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(2):203–210. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1081274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1 (20.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 20 kb)


Articles from International Journal of Colorectal Disease are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES