Skip to main content
Bioscience Reports logoLink to Bioscience Reports
. 2017 Oct 11;37(5):BSR20170794. doi: 10.1042/BSR20170794

Neupogen and mesenchymal stem cells are the novel therapeutic agents in regeneration of induced endometrial fibrosis in experimental rats

Dina Sabry 1,, Abeer Mostafa 1, Samar Marzouk 1, Walaa Ibrahim 1, Hanan HM Ali 2, Aymen Hassan 3, Ashraf Shamaa 4
PMCID: PMC5635209  PMID: 28883083

Abstract

Endometrial fibrosis is the presence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after any uterine surgery or curettage and it results in infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. We evaluated the role of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) as a therapeutic agent of endometrial fibrosis. We also compared the effect of MSCs with the effect of estrogen and neupogen either each alone or as a combined therapy with MSCs. This experimental study was performed on 84 albino rats which were divided into seven groups (n=12 rats/group) as follows, group1: normal control rats, group 2: induced fibrosis, group 3: induced fibrosis that received oral estrogen, group 4: induced fibrosis that received hMSCs, group 5: induced fibrosis that received hMSCs and estrogen, group 6: induced fibrosis that received neupogen, and group 7: induced fibrosis that received hMSCs and neupogen. The extent of fibrosis, vascularization, and inflammation were evaluated by; qRT-PCR for interleukin 1 (IL-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), TNF, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and RUNX; ELISA for connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); Western blotting for collagen-I; immunohistochemistry examination for VEGF and RUNX-2; and histopathological assessment. In therapeutic groups either by hMSCs alone or combined with estrogen or neupogen; fibrosis and inflammation (IL-1, IL-6, TNF, TGF-β, RUNX, CTGF, and collagen-I) were significantly decreased but vascularization (VEGF) was significantly increased (P<0.05) compared with induced fibrosis group. The most significant result was obtained in fibrosis that received combined therapy of hMSCs and neupogen (P=0.000). Stem cells and neupogen are a highly effective alternative regenerative agents in endometrial fibrosis.

Keywords: endometrial fibrosis, mesenchymal stem cell, Neuopogen

Introduction

Endometrial fibrosis is the presence of intrauterine adhesion (IUA), which may follow uterine surgery, e.g. curettage done after miscarriage or due to infections such as TB [1]. In 2013, it was estimated that 171 million women were affected [2]. The fibrosis is progressive and a chronic process. It results from interaction of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), TNF, and fibrotic factors as TGF, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and collagen 1. This interaction allows excessive accumulation of ECM, which is a key step in fibrosis [3]. Traditional treatment of IUA is surgical removal of the adhesion followed by hormonal therapy. Estrogen is the most commonly used hormone in supraphysiological dose to allow the regeneration of the endometrium. However, this modality of treatment is characterized by high failure rate due to reformation of the adhesion [4]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide a novel method in the treatment of fibrotic disease due to their ability to evade the immune detection, secrete anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic mediators [5]. Neupogen is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) analog used to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of granulocytes and release stem cells into the bloodstream [6]. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of estrogen, neupogen, and MSCs separately or as a combined therapy in regeneration of induced endometrial fibrosis in rats.

Material and methods

Isolation of human umbilical cord MSCs

Human umbilical cord specimens were obtained using protocols approved by the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, in collaboration with the Labor and Delivery nursing staff. After obtaining patients’ informed consents, four fresh cord samples of women with healthy pregnancies were retrieved during casarean deliveries. Wharton jelly was harvested from term deliveries at the time of birth. Wharton jelly was minced and incubated with collagenase II enzyme (IgG, C. histoliticum, Biological life science, U.S.A.) at 37°C for 2 h. Strainer (Invitrogen, CA, U.S.A.) was applied to remove tissue debris. Isolated cells were cultured and propagated in 10% and 1× pen/strep (Invitrogen, CA, U.S.A.) at 5% CO2, 37°C until reaching 70–80% confluence. After 1 week of culture; cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized with 0.25% trypsin for 5 min at 37°C. After centrifugation, cell pellets were resuspended and propagated in RPMI-160 medium as first-passage cultures [7]. For MSCs characterization; 1 × 105 cells were incubated with 10 μl of monoclonal antibodies: CD105 PE, CD29 PE, and CD34 PE (Beckman Coulter, U.S.A.) at 4°C in the dark, same species isotypes served as a negative control. After incubation, 2 ml of PBS containing 2% FBS solution were added, centrifuged, and cells were resuspended with PBS. FACS analysis was performed using CYTOMICS FC 500 (Beckman Coulter, FL, U.S.A.) and CXP Software version 2.2 for interpretation. MSCs were further characterized by their differentiation into adipocytes. The differentiation was achieved by adipocytes StemPro® adipogenesis differentiation kit (Gibco, Life Technology) and they were stained by Oil Red O stain (Sigma, catalog# 0-0625). MSCs were labeled with GFP (pAcGFP1-N1 vector, Clontech Laboratories, Inc. (U.S.A.), catalog# 632469) for in vivo tracing and observed in unstained uterine tissues cryosections using Fluorescence Microscope (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Ernst-Leitz-Straße, Wetzlar D-35578, Germany).

Experimental animals

An approval from Institutional Animal Care was taken prior to study. The Animal House Unit of Cairo University provided the veterinary care. Preparation of the experimental animal model of induced endometrial fibrosis was done. Under flutothane inhalational anesthesia, laparotomy was done and the pelvic region was exposed. Then, 0.1 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid was injected into right uterine horn. One month after surgery, two rats were killed to confirm the induction of endometrial fibrosis [8]. Then, after establishing the model, the study started, with 84 female rats, recruited from the animal house at Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. The average weight of the animals was 170–230 g. The animals were housed in wire mesh cages at room temperature with 12:12-h light-dark cycles and were maintained on standard rat chow and tap water. Animals were randomly divided into seven groups (12 animals each): group 1: a negative control; group 2: induced endometrial fibrosis (pathological control); group 3: induced endometrial fibrosis that received human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) (2 × 106 cells/ml intraperitoneally/week) [8]; group 4: induced endometrial fibrosis that received 0.1 mg/kg daily oral estrogen [8], group 5: induced endometrial fibrosis that received 2 × 106 hMSCs + 0.1 mg/kg and daily oral estrogen; group 6: induced endometrial fibrosis that received neupogen (300 µg/ml IV injection in tail vein, three times/week) [9], and group 7: induced endometrial fibrosis that received 2 × 106 hMSCs + 300 µg/ml neupogen.

After 1 month of stem cell and drugs administration, the rats were killed and uterine tissues were harvested and subjected to histopathological and immunhistochemical evaluations and molecular study.

Histopathological evaluation

Uterine tissues of all the studied groups were separately collected and fixed overnight in 40 g/l paraformaldehyde at 4°C. The uterine horns were cut by serial transverse sections and put into processing cassette. Then, the paraffin blocks were prepared from each cassette separately. In brief, tissue dehydration carried out in ascending concentrations of ethanol (alcohol) with 70, 90, and 100% (three changes). Then, specimens were cleared by three changes of xylene. Thereafter, the specimens are ready to be infiltrated by wax and formation of paraffin blocks. Two slides of 4-μm thick sections were prepared: one for routine Hematoxylin–Eosin (H&E) staining and the other for Masson’s trichrome stain (for highlighting fibrosis). Then, these slides were examined for fibrosis, inflammation, and vascular proliferation graded on a semiquantitative, Table 1 [8].

Table 1. A modified semiquantitative histopathological scale for uterine tissue grades.

Grades Fibrosis Inflammation Vasculature Uterine gland
Grade 0 No fibrosis No inflammation No vascular proliferation No glandular proliferation
Grade 1 Minimal loose fibrosis Presence of occasional lymphocytes and plasma cells Mild vascular proliferation Mild glandular proliferation
Grade 2 Moderate fibrosis Presence of plasma cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils Moderate vascular proliferation Moderate glandular proliferation
Grade 3 Dense fibrosis Presence of many inflammatory cells and microabscesses Intense vascular proliferation Intense glandular proliferation

Immunhistochemical evaluation

After slide preparation as discussed above, antigen retrieval was performed using microwave heating (three times for 10 min in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH: 6.0) after inhibition of endogenous peroxidase for 15 min. The slides were incubated for 1 h with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (VEGF antibody (VG1) Novus Biologicals (NB100-664)), RUNX (RUNX2/CBFA1 antibody) Novus Biologicals (cat# L012V1) at room temperature, then washed using PBS and incubated with secondary antibody (Invitrogen, U.K.) for 15 min followed by PBS wash. Finally, the detection of bound antibody was accomplished using the avidin–biotin complex (ABC) reagent for 20 min, then PBS wash. A 0.1%-solution of diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Thermo Scientific, U.S.A.) was used for 5 min as a chromogen. Slides were counterstained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin for 5–10 min. All histopathological examinations were performed by a designated pathologist experienced in rat histology. To evaluate VEGF expression, the number of capillary vessels and proliferation cells were counted and averaged from at least four randomly selected fields under a magnification of 200×. For RUNX, the average optical density (mean density) represented the intensity of protein expression and was counted in four random fields under a magnification of 200×.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Real-time PCR was performed for quantitative genes expression of IL-1, interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), VEGF, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and Runt-related genes (RUNIX). Uterine samples of all the studied groups were lysed and total RNA was isolated with GeneJET Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Germany, #K0732). Ten nanograms of the total RNA from each sample were used for reverse transcription with subsequent amplification with Bioline, a median life science company, U.K. (SensiFAST™ SYBR® Hi-ROX) One-step Kit (catalog number PI-50217 V) in a 48-well plate using the Step-one instrument (Applied Biosystems, U.S.A.). Thermal profile was as follows: 45°C for 15 min in one cycle (for cDNA synthesis), 10 min at 95°C for reverse transcriptase enzyme inactivation, followed by 40 cycles of PCR amplification. Each cycle was carried out for : 10 s at 95°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 30 s at 72°C. Changes in the expression of each target gene were normalized relative to the mean critical threshold (CT) values of GAPDH as the housekeeping gene by the ΔΔCt method. Primers’ sequences for all the studied genes were demonstrated in Table 2.

Table 2. Primers sequences of all the studied genes.

Genes Primer sequence from 5′ to 3′ GenBank accession number
TGF-β Forward: CTACTGCTTCAGCTCCACAG XM016135677.1
Reverse: GCACTTGCAGGAGCGCAC
TNF-α Forward: GCCTCTTCTCATTCCTGCTT AF269160.1
Reverse: CACTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGA
VEGF Forward: CTCCGAAACCATGAACTTTCTGCTC NM031836.2
Reverse: CAGCCTGGCTCACCGCCTTGGCTT
IL-1 Forward: CTGTGGCAGCTACCTATGTCTTG NM031512.2
Reverse: AGGTCGTCATCATCCCACGAG
IL-6 Forward: TTCCATCCAGTTGCCTTCTT NM001314054.1
Reverse: ATTTCCACGATTTCCCAGAG
RUNX Forward: CCAGATGGGACTGTGGTTACC XR385272.3
Reverse: ACTTGGTGCAGAGTTCAGGG
GAPDH Forward: ACAGTCCATGCCATCACTGCC NG009348.3
Reverse: GCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTG

ELISA

Tissue CTGF was assessed to evaluate the fibrosis extent in uterine tissue of all the studied groups (pg/ml). Rat CTGF ELISA Kit (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei Province, catalog number E-EL-R0259) was used according to manual’s instructions.

Western blot

The collagen type І antibody used was purchased from Thermo Scientific (MA1-26771).

Protein from uterine tissue was extracted by RIPA lysis buffer which was provided by Bio Basic Inc. (Markham, Ontario L3R 8T4, Canada). Extracted protein was separated by SDS/PAGE on 4–20% polyacrylamide gradient gels. After incubation in 5% non-fat dry milk, Tris/HCl, 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h; collagen-I monoclonal antibody was added to one of the membranes containing specimen samples and incubated at 4°C overnight. Appropriate secondary antibodies were incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After being washed twice with 1× TBST, densitometric analyses of the immunoblots were performed to quantitate the amount of collagen-I against control sample by total protein normalization using image analysis software on the ChemiDoc MP imaging system (version 3) produced by Bio–Rad (Hercules, CA).

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered using the statistical package SPSS version 22. Data were summarized using mean and S.D. Comparisons between groups were done using ANOVA with multiple comparisons post-hoc test [10]. P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Data were expressed as mean ± S.D., P-value <0.05 was significant. *: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in normal control group. #: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis group °: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis and estrogen group @: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis and MSCs group. $: Statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis and neupogen group. ▪: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis + MSCs + estrogen group.

Results

The MSCs in culture were identified morphologically by assessing fusiform fibroblast like cells (Figure 1, panel I(A)), and then differentiated into adipocytes (Figure 1, panel I(B)). The differentiated adipocytes were stained with Oil Red O stain. MSCs were further characterized by cell surface phenotyping assessment. MSCs showed 99.82% positive expression for the β1-integrin CD29, 98.98% positive expression for the endoglin receptor CD105, and negative for CD 34 (Figure 1, panel II). MSCs were labeled in culture with GFP (Figure 1, panel III(A)). GFP-labeled MSCs were traced in uterine tissue (Figure 1, panel III(B)).

Figure 1. MSCs were assessed for propagation, differentiation, characterization, and labeling.

Figure 1

Panel I(A): MSCs were isolated as fibroblast-like cells. (B) MSCs were differentiated into adipocytes stained with Oil Red O stain. Panel II: FACS analysis characterized MSCs; they were positive for CD29 and CD105 surface markers and negative for CD34. Panel III(A) MSCs were labeled with GFP in vitro. (B) Uterine tissue showed in vivo GFP-labeled cells for tracing of MSCs in uterine tissue.

The uterine specimens were evaluated histopathologically for fibrosis, inflammation, vascular, and uterine glands proliferation according to grades in Table 1 The normal uterine tissue presented with intact endothelium and patent uterine cavity by the black arrow, no inflammatory cells (grade 0), normal vasculature, and normal uterine gland by the blue arrow (Figure 2.1A). The induced endometrial fibrosis presented with obliterated uterine cavity, grade 3 dense fibrosis, grade 2 inflammation, grade 1 mild vascular proliferation, and grade 0 no glandular proliferation (Figure 2.1B). The induced endometrial fibrosis treated with estrogen only showed necrotic endothelium, grade 3 dense fibrosis, grade 3 inflammation, grade 1 mild vascular proliferation, and grade 0 no glandular proliferation (Figure 2.1C). The induced endometrial fibrosis treated with stem cells only showed patent uterine cavity, grade 2 moderate fibrosis, grade 2 inflammation, grade 2 moderate vascular proliferation, and grade 2 moderate glandular proliferation (Figure 2.1D). The induced endometrial fibrosis treated with stem cells and estrogen with patent uterine cavity, grade 1 mild fibrosis, grade 2 inflammation, grade 2 moderate vascular proliferation, and grade 2 moderate glandular proliferation (Figure 2.1E). The induced endometrial fibrosis treated with stem cells and neupogen presented with patent uterine cavity, grade 0 no fibrosis, grade 0 no inflammation, grade 3 intense vascular proliferation, and grade 3 intense glandular proliferation(Figure 2.1F). The induced endometrial fibrosis treated with neupogen only were having patent uterine cavity, grade 1 mild fibrosis, grade 2 inflammation, grade 2 moderate vascular proliferation, and grade 2 moderate glandular proliferation (Figure 2.1G).

Figure 2.1. Histopathological assessment of uterine tissues in all the studied groups.

Figure 2.1

(A) Normal uterus, (B) induced endomertial fibrosis, (C) fibrosis treated with estrogen only, (D) fibrosis treated with MSCs only, (E) fibrosis treated with estrogen and MSCs, (F) fibrosis treated with neupogen and MSCs, and (G) fibrosis treated with neupogen only. Black arrow represents the uterine cavity and blue arrow the uterine gland.

Immunhistochemical staining of VEGF and RUNX were assessed by the presence of brown nuclear positive reactivity (Figure 2.2,2.3), respectively. Staining index was increased in uterine tissue of combined MSCs-treated groups with the highest significant index increase in MSCs + neupogen-treated group when compared with other groups.

Figure 2.2. The immunohistochemical assessment for VEGF of uterine tissues in the all studied groups.

Figure 2.2

(A) Normal uterus, (B) induced endomertial fibrosis, (C) fibrosis treated with estrogen only, (D) fibrosis treated with MSCs only, (E) fibrosis treated with estrogen and MSCs, (F) fibrosis treated with neupogen and MSCs, and (G) fibrosis treated with neupogen only. (H) Mean percent area for VEGF positive immune reaction.

Figure 2.3. The immunohistochemical assessment for RUNX of uterine tissues in all the studied groups.

Figure 2.3

(A) Normal uterus, (B) induced endomertial fibrosis, (C) fibrosis treated with estrogen only, (D) fibrosis treated with MSCs only, (E) fibrosis treated with estrogen and MSCs, (F) fibrosis treated with neupogen and MSCs, and (G) fibrosis treated with neupogen only. (H) Mean percent area for RUNX positive immune reaction.

Genes’ expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) showed statistical significant decrease in groups treated either with neupogen only or MSCs only (P<0.05), with highly significant decrease observed in MSCs and neupogen treated group compared with fibrosis group (P=0.000) (Figure 3A–C, respectively). VEGF expression level has a statistical significant increase in either MSCs treated groups or neupogen-treated group (P-value <0.05), with highest significant increase in MSCs and neupogen treated group compared with fibrosis group (P=0.015) (Figure 3D).

Figure 3. Quantitative genes’ expression of the target genes in all the studied groups.

Figure 3

(A) IL-1, (B) IL-6, (C) TNF-α, (D) VEGF, (E) RUNX, and (F) TGF-β.

RUNX as an antifibrotic factor showed a statistical significant increase in MSCs treated group (P-value <0.05), with highly significant increase observed in MSCs and neupogen treated group compared with fibrosis group (P=0.001) (Figure 3E).

As regarding markers of fibrosis (TGF-β, CTGF, and collagen-I), there was a statistical significant decrease in neupogen treated group and MSCs treated groups (P-value <0.05) with greater significant decrease observed in MSCs and neupogen treated group compared with fibrosis group (P=0.000) (Figures 3F,4,5 matched with Table 3, respectively).

Figure 4. CTGF expression levels in all the studied groups.

Figure 4

Figure 5. The quantitative scanning densitometry results of collagen-1 normalized compared with β-actin protein levels in different groups.

Figure 5

Table 3. Quantitative Western blot protein expression level of collagen-1 in all the studied groups.

Groups Normal Fibrosis Fibrosis + MSCs Fibrosis + estrogen Fibrosis + neupogen Fibrosis + MSCs + estrogen Fibrosis + MSCs + neupogen
Collagen-1 0.29 ± 0.05 1.60 ± 0.45* 1.21 ± 0.05* 1.59 ± 0.09* 0.34 ± 0.08#°@ 0.81 ± 0.09#° 0.20 ± 0.05#°@▪

*: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in normal control group. #: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis group °: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis and estrogen group @: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis and MSCs group. $: Statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis and neupogen group. ▪: statistically significant compared with corresponding value in fibrosis + MSCs + estrogen group.

No statistical significant effect of estrogen treatment compared with fibrosis group regarding either inflammatory cytokines or fibrotic factor. Thus, treatment with estrogen alone is not sufficiently an effective therapy.

Discussion

IUAs prevent the endometrium from growing, resulting in infertility. Many therapies have been attempted for these conditions, but none have proved to be effective [11]. The general idea is to encourage fast growth of any residual endometrium immediately after surgical removal of the adhesion with the dual purpose of preventing new scar formation and restoring a normal uterine environment. It is supposed that this goal can only be achieved with supraphysiological hormonal levels [12]. However, the efficacy is not same in every patient. Regenerative medicine offers the potential for replacement or repair of different types of cells within damaged tissues. In this work, estrogen therapy, stem cell releasing factor (neupogen) as well as MSCs were evaluated and compared regarding their efficacy in treatment of endometrial fibrosis. The current results revealed that there was a significant decrease in IL-1 gene expression level in all MSCs treated groups and the neupogen treated group compared with the fibrosis group. IL-1 gene expression and its relation with development of fibrosis have been stated in previous studies as it promotes hepatic stellate cell (HSC) proliferation, which plays a critical role in development of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis [13]. Similarly, systemic infusion of BMSCs reduced skin contracture, thickening, collagen deposition, and decreased expression of IL-1 in the irradiated skin [14]. In another study where, a model of endometriosis was established and up-regulation of fibrotic markers (TGF, CTGF, and collagen-1) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) were recorded [15]. Neupogen treatment reinforces innate immunity and enables prevention of inflammation, which is a preliminary step for development of fibrosis [16]. In the current study, there was no significant relation between estradiol administration and IL-1 level, in contrast with that, a down-regulation of the IL-1RtI in uterine epithelial cell line after incubation with estradiol for 72 h was previously reported [17]. Regarding IL-6, the current results revealed that a significant decrease in its expression in MSCs treated groups compared with the fibrosis group and the estrogen treated fibrosis group. Treatment with neupogen alone gives the same results. However, treatment with MSCs + neupogen showed the highest significant decrease in IL- 6 expression levels amongst all the studied groups. Supporting current results, researchers found significant increase in IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF in a mare model of endometritis with chronic pathological endometrial changes including fibrosis [18]. So, IL-6 causes compromised tissue repair by shifting acute inflammation into a more chronic profibrotic state [19]. Endogenous G-CSF may counter regulate the inflammatory cytokine cascade (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF) and implies a potential indication for filgrastim (recombinant methionyl human G-CSF) in chronic inflammatory conditions [20]. In consistence with the current results, the administration of uMSCs reduced inflammation and inhibited the expression of transforming growth factor-β, and the proinflammatory cytokines (IL- 1 and 6), collagen I, macrophage migratory inhibitory factor, and TNF in bleomycin induced lung fibrosis in mice [21]. Neupogen treatment significantly attenuated hyperoxia-induced lung injury in neonatal rats by down-modulating the gene expression of IL-6, TNF, and TGF [22]. The current results revealed that there was a significant decrease in TNF gene levels in the groups treated by MSCs, neupogen, and MSCs + neupogen compared with the untreated fibrosis group. The current results agreed with researchers who found increases in TNF, IL-1β, and IL-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pulmonary fibrosis rat model [23]. Estrogen can promote the growth of endometriotic lesions by increasing the TNF levels [24]. BMSCs treatment resulted in the regeneration of the endometrium via modulation of the expression of proinflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-1 in experimental rats [25]. Researchers suggested that neupogen shifts the proinflammatory responses to anti-inflammatory pattern to be used in chronic inflammatory conditions [26].

The current study revealed that there was a significant increase in VEGF gene expression in uterine tissues in neupogen, combined MSCs treated groups compared with the fibrosis group.

This work was matched with another work which reported that the immunohistochemical staining of VEGF was increased in endometrial fibrosis rats treated by MSCs alone and MSCs combined with estrogen [8]. Angiogenesis and the hypoxic changes in the endometrial glands and interstitium were also improved in endometrial fibrosis patient treated by hormonal therapy [27]. In consistence with the current results, researchers reported that neupogen increases the serum VEGF by 1.5-fold [28].

The present results revealed that MSCs combined groups showed significant decrease in TGF-β compared with estrogen alone or neupogen alone, which indicates the valuable role of MSCs in limitation of fibrosis though inhibition of TGF-β.

TGF-β cytokines might be involved in formation of IUAs [29]. TGF-β immunoreactivity was high in rats with adenomyosis [30]. A recent study suggested that exosomes derived from human umbilical cord stem cells (hucMSCs) could ameliorate carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) induced liver fibrosis through lowering of TGF-β gene expression [31]. Hyperstimulation with estrogen increases the expression of TGF-β [32]. Regarding CTGF, there was a statistical significant decrease in neupogen treated group and MSCs treated groups (P-value <0.05) with greater significant decrease observed in MSCs and neupogen treated group and decreased fibrosis in histologically examined sections compared with fibrosis group. This agreed with researchers who found that TGF-β and CTGF levels were significantly increased in association with endometrial fibrosis [33]. 17β-estradiol diminishes the development of myocardial fibrosis by decreasing the TGF-β and CTGF gene expression [34]. TGF-β and CTGF mRNA were strongly stimulated after estradiol administration in ovarectomized mice [35]. The current results also agreed with researchers who found that MSCs increased VEGF, decreased CTGF, TNF, and IL-6 levels and collagen density in perinatal rats exposed to hyperoxia induced pulmonary dysplasia [36]. Regarding the assessment of collagen I protein by Western blotting, MSCs combined with neupogen significantly decreased the collagen I content compared with all the treated groups. Moreover, neupogen alone significantly decreased the collagen I content compared with the untreated fibrosis group and the treated groups by estrogen alone or MSCs alone. This supported the anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effect of neupogen. Neupogen is a new therapeutic modality for schistosomiasis through stem cell mobilization, immunomodulation, or fibrosis remodeling [37]. These results support previously reported work which found that the expression levels of fibrotic markers TGF-β, CTGF, collagen I, and collagen III were elevated in IUA rat model [38,39]. In addition, the development of fibrosis in the irradiated lungs was limited after infusion of Ad-MSCs through decreasing the expression of collagen I and collagen III [39]. Estrogen administration alone showed no statistical significant effect to fibrosis group regarding either IL-1, IL-6, TGF-β, CTGF, collagen I levels (inflammatory cytokines or fibrotic factor). Thus, treatment with estrogen alone is not sufficiently an effective therapy. Furthermore, collagen biosynthesis is stimulated by low doses of estradiol in cultured leiomyoma cells [40].

The present results revealed that there was a significant increase in RUNX gene expression and antibody in MSCs treated groups either alone or combined with estrogen or neupogen compared with the fibrosis group. RUNX is a novel target for protection against fibrosis-related diseases [41]. RUNX knockout (−/−) mice had loss of leukocytic cell autonomous function and causes inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [42]. Another study using RUNX knockout mice found that collagen fibers are deposited in a disorganized manner amongst clusters of infiltrating inflammatory cells indicating airway fibrosis [43]. RUNX is required for MSCs cell cycle progression and proliferation and it inhibits their myofibroblastic differentiation [44]. RUNX knockdown models’ study revealed that MSCs exhibited a sharply reduced capacity for proliferation [45].

Conclusion

From the present study, we can conclude that combined treatment with MSCs and neupogen gives optimum results for reversing the endometrial fibrosis. In addition, estrogen, which is the current treatment of endometrial fibrosis to regenerate the endometrium after surgical removal of IUA, is not a sufficiently effective therapy.

Abbreviations

CTGF

connective tissue growth factor

G-CSF

granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

hMSC

human mesenchymal stem cell

IL-1

interleukin 1

IL-6

interleukin 6

IUA

intrauterine adhesion

RUNX

runt-related transcription factor

TGF-β

transforming growth factor-β

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-α

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Author contribution

Dina Sabry, Abeer Moustafa, Samar Marzouk and Walaa Ibrahim have designed the experiment, stem cell isolation, characterization and molecular practical laboratory work. Hanan Ali has done the histopathological immunohistochemistry examination. Aymen Hassan was responsible for human umbilical cord samples collection. Ashraf Shamaa was responsible for the surgical experimental induction of endometrial fibrosis. All authors have written and revised the research article.

Funding

This research article was funded by Cairo University.

References

  • 1.Bazoobandi S., Tanideh N., Rahmanifar F., Tamadon A., Keshtkar M., Mehrabani D. et al. (2016) Induction of Asherman’s syndrome in rabbit. J. Reprod. Infertil. 17, 10–16 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators (2015) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386, 743–800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Speca S., Giusti I., Rieder F. and Latella G. (2012) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of intestinal fibrosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 18, 3635–3661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Takai I., Kwayabura A., Ugwa E., Idrissa A., Obed J. and Bukar M. (2015) A 10-year review of the clinical presentation and treatment outcome of Asherman’s syndrome at a center with limited resources. Ann. Med. Health Sci. Res. 5, 442–446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Golpanian S., Wolf A., Hatzistergos K. and Hare J. (2016) Rebuilding the damaged heart: mesenchymal stem cells, cell-based therapy, and engineered heart tissue. Physiol. Rev. 96, 1127–1168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Couban S., Aljurf M., Lachance S., Walker I., Toze C., Rubinger M. et al. (2016) Filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow compared with filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood in myeloablative sibling allografting for patients with hematologic malignancies: a randomized Canadian Blood and Marrow Transplant Group Study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 22, 1410–1415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weiss M., Medicetty S., Bledsoe A., Rachakatla R., Choi M., Merchav S. et al. (2006) Human umbilical cord matrix stem cells: preliminary characterization and effect of transplantation in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. Stem Cells 24, 781–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kilic S., Yuksel B., Pinarli F., Albayrak A., Boztok B. and Delibasi T. (2014) Effect of stem cell application on Ashermansyndrome,an experimental rat model. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 31, 975–982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ross D., Maerz T., Kurdziel M., Hein J., Doshi S., Bedi A. et al. (2015) The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on rotator cuff healing after injury and repair. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 473, 1655–1664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chan Y. (2003) Biostatistics102: quantitative data–parametric & non-parametric tests. Singapore Med. J. 44, 391–396 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Santamaria X., Cabanillas S., Cervelló I., Arbona C., Raga F., Ferro J. et al. (2016) Autologus cell therapy with CD133+ bone marrow -derived stem cells for refractory Asherman’s syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a pilot cohort study. Hum. Reprod. 31, 1087–1096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Buda A., Marco C., Dolci C., Elisei F., Baldo R., Locatelli L. et al. (2013) Sentinel node mapping in high risk endometrial cancer after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 4, 809–812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reiter FP., Wimmer R., Wottke L., Artmann R., Nagel J.M., Carranza M.O. et al. (2016) Role of interleukin-1 and its antagonism of hepatic stellate cell proliferation and liver fibrosis in the Abcb4 (-/-) mouse model. World J. Hepatol. 18, 401–410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Horton J., Hudak K., Chung E.J., White A., Scroggins B.T., Burkeen J.F. et al. (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit cutaneous radiation-induced fibrosis by suppressing chronic inflammation. Stem Cells 31, 2231–2241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rebordão M., Galvão A., Szóstek A., Amaral A., Mateus L., Skarzynski D. et al. (2014) Physiopathologic mechanisms involved in mare endometrosis. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 49 (Suppl. 4), 82–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schneider C., von Aulock S., Zedler S., Schinkel C., Hartung T. and Faist E. (2004) Perioperative recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Filgrastim) treatment prevents immunoinflammatory dysfunction associated with major surgery. Ann. Surg. 239, 75–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schaefer T., Wright J., Pioli P. and Wira C. (2005) IL-1β-mediated proinflammatory responses are inhibited by estradiol via down-regulation of IL-1 receptor type I in uterine epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 175, 6509–6516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reilas T., Rivera Del Alamo M.M., Liepina E., Yeste M. and Katila T. (2016) Effects on the equine endometrium of cervical occlusion after insemination. Theriogenology 85, 617–624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fielding C., Jones G., McLoughlin R., McLeod L., Hammond V., Uceda J. et al. (2014) Interleukin-6 signaling drives fibrosis in unresolved inflammation. Immunity 40, 40–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kubyshkin A., Aliev L., Fomochkina I.I., Kovalenko Y.P., Litvinova S.V., Filonenko T.G. et al. (2016) Endometrial hyperplasia-related inflammation: its role in the development and progression of endometrial hyperplasia. Inflamm. Res. 65, 785–794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Moodley Y., Atienza D., Manuelpillai U., Samuel C.S., Tchongue J., Ilancheran S. et al. (2009) Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reduce fibrosis of bleomycin-induced lung injury. Am. J. Pathol. 175, 303–313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jeon G., Sung D., Jung Y., Koo S., Choi S., Chang Y. et al. (2011) Granulocyte colony stimulating factor attenuates hyperoxia-induced lung injury by down-modulating inflammatory esponses in neonatal rats. Yonsei Med. J. 52, 65–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu W., Sun L. and Yang H. (2016) Inhibitory effects of astragaloside IV on bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats via attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation. Inflammation 39, 1835–1841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Engelbrechtsen L., Langhoff-Roos J., Kjer J. and Istre O. (2015) Placenta accreta: adherent placenta due to Asherman syndrome. Clin. Case Reports 3, 175–178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao J., Zhang Q., Wang Y. and Li Y. (2015) Uterine infusion with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improves endometrium thickness in a rat model of thin endometrium. Reprod. Sci. 22, 181–188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hartung T., Doecke W., Bundschuh D., Foote M., Gantner F., Hermann C. et al. (1999) Effect of filgrastim treatment on inflammatory cytokines and lymphocyte functions. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther 66, 415–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen Y., Chang Y. and Yao S. (2013) Role of angiogenesis in endometrial repair of patients with severe intrauterine adhesion. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 6, 1343–1350 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fujii K., Ishimaru F., Kozuka T., Matsuo K., Nakase K., Kataoka I. et al. (2004) Elevation of serum hepatocyte growth factor during granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. Br. J. Haematol. 124, 190–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tao Z. and Duan H. (2012) Expression of adhesion-related cytokines in the uterine fluid after transcervical resection of adhesion. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 47, 734–737 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shen M., Liu X., Zhang H. and Guo S. (2016) Transforming growth factor β1 signaling coincides with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the development of adenomyosis in mice. Hum. Reprod. 31, 355–369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li T., Yan Y., Wang B., Qian H., Zhang X., Shen L. et al. (2013) Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate liver fibrosis. Stem Cells Dev. 22, 845–854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jovanović A. and Kramer B. (2010) The effect of hyperstimulation on transforming growth factor beta(1) and beta(2) in the rat uterus: possible consequences for embryo implantation. Fertil. Steril. 93, 1509–1517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xue X., Chen Q., Zhao G., Zhao J.-Y., Duan Z. and Zheng P. (2015) The overexpression of TGF-β and CCN2 in intrauterine adhesions involves the NF-κβ signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 10, e0146159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Westphal C., Schubert C., Prelle K., Penkalla A., Fliegner D., Petrov G. et al. (2012) Effects of estrogen, an ERα agonist and raloxifene on pressure overload induced cardiac hypertrophy. PLoS ONE 7, e50802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rageh M.A.E., Moussad E.E.-D.A., Wilson A.K. and Brigstock D.R. (2001) Steroidal regulation of connective tissue growth factor (CCN2; CTGF) synthesis in the mouse uterus. Mol. Pathol. 54, 338–346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chou H., Li Y. and Chen C.M. (2016) Human mesenchymal stem cells attenuate experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia induced by perinatal inflammation and hyperoxia. Am. J. Transl. Res. 8, 342–353 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ghanem L.Y., Dahmen U., Dirsch O., Nosseir M.M., Mahmoud S.S. and Mansour W.A. (2010) Does granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration induce damage or repair response in schistosomiasis? World J. Hepatol. 2, 434–441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hu J., Zeng B., Jiang X., Hu L., Meng Y., Zhu Y. et al. (2015) The expression of marker for endometrial stem cell and fibrosis was increased in intrauterine adhesions. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 1, 1525–1534 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li J., Cen B., Chen S. and He Y. (2016) MicroRNA-29b inhibits TGF-β1-induced fibrosis via regulation of the TGF-β1/Smad pathway in primary human endometrial stromal cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 13, 4229–4237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zbucka M., Miltyk W., Bielawski T., Surazynski A., Palka J. and Wolczynski S. (2007) Mechanism of collagen biosynthesis up-regulation in cultured leiomyoma cells. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 45 (Suppl. 1), S181–S185 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim J., Jang H.S., Jeong J.H., Noh M.R., Choi J.Y. and Park K.M. (2013) Defect in Runx2 gene accelerates ureteral obstruction-induced kidney fibrosis via increased TGF-β signaling pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832, 1520–1527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brenner O., Levanon D., Negreanu V., Golubkov O., Fainaru O., Woolf E. et al. (2004) Loss of Runx3 function in leukocytes is associated with spontaneously developed colitis and gastric mucosal hyperplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16016–16021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fainaru O., Woolf E., Lotem J., Yarmus M., Brenner O., Goldenberg D. et al. (2004) Runx3 regulates mouse TGF‐β‐mediated dendritic cell function and its absence results in airway inflammation. EMBO J. 23, 969–979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee K.S., Kim H.J., Li Q.L., Chi X.Z., Ueta C., Komori T. et al. (2000) Runx2 is a common target of transforming growth factor beta1 and bone morphogenetic protein 2, and cooperation between Runx2 and Smad5 induces osteoblast-specific gene expression in the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 8783–8792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Reference deleted. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioscience Reports are provided here courtesy of Portland Press Ltd

RESOURCES