Skip to main content
Genome Biology and Evolution logoLink to Genome Biology and Evolution
. 2015 Oct 15;7(11):3062–3069. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv198

Genome Sequencing of Multiple Isolates Highlights Subtelomeric Genomic Diversity within Fusarium fujikuroi

Matteo Chiara 1,2,1, Francesca Fanelli 3,2, Giuseppina Mulè 3, Antonio F Logrieco 3, Graziano Pesole 2,4,5,6, John F Leslie 7, David S Horner 1,*, Christopher Toomajian 7
PMCID: PMC5635591  PMID: 26475319

Abstract

Comparisons of draft genome sequences of three geographically distinct isolates of Fusarium fujikuroi with two recently published genome sequences from the same species suggest diverse profiles of secondary metabolite production within F. fujikuroi. Species- and lineage-specific genes, many of which appear to exhibit expression profiles that are consistent with roles in host–pathogen interactions and adaptation to environmental changes, are concentrated in subtelomeric regions. These genomic compartments also exhibit distinct gene densities and compositional characteristics with respect to other genomic partitions, and likely play a role in the generation of molecular diversity. Our data provide additional evidence that gene duplication, divergence, and differential loss play important roles in F. fujikuroi genome evolution and suggest that hundreds of lineage-specific genes might have been acquired through horizontal gene transfer.

Keywords: mycotoxin, comparative genomics, secondary metabolites

Introduction

Fusarium fujikuroi ([Hsieh et al. 1977] synonym, Gibberella fujikuroi mating population C) is the causal agent of the rice disease bakanae (Leslie and Summerell 2006) which, due to fungal production and secretion of gibberellic acids, is characterized by the formation of excessively elongated seedlings with chlorotic stems and leaves (Sunder 1998).

In addition to plant hormones (Rademacher 1997; Tudzynski 1999, 2005), F. fujikuroi can potentially produce a broad spectrum of secondary metabolites (SMs), including pigments (Linnemannstons et al. 2002; Prado et al. 2004; Rodriguez-Ortiz et al. 2013), mycotoxins, such as fumonisins (Proctor et al. 2004), moniliformin (Harvey et al. 1997), fusaric acid, beauvericin and fusarin C (Marasas et al. 1988; Barrero et al. 1991;Desjardins et al. 2000; Leslie, Zeller, Logrieco, et al. 2004), as well as other compounds of biological interest (Avalos et al. 2007).

Here, we present draft genome sequences of three geographically distinct F. fujikuroi isolates and summarize the results of comparative genomic analyses incorporating two other recently published complete F. fujikuroi genome sequences (Jeong et al. 2013; Wiemann et al. 2013) and that of the closely related species Fusarium verticillioides ITEM 7600 (Ma et al. 2013) (table 1) focusing on genome-wide evolutionary patterns as well as characterized and candidate SM biosynthesis genes and gene clusters.

Table 1.

Strains Used in This Study

Strain Number Species Origin Reference
KSU 3368 F. fujikuroi Thailand, rice (1990) This Study
KSU X-10626 F. fujikuroi Konza Prairie (USA), Schizachyrium scoparium (1997) This Study, Leslie, Zeller, Logrieco, et al. 2004; Leslie, Zeller, Wohler, et al. 2004
FGSC 8932 F. fujikuroi Taiwan, rice This Study, Kuhlman 1982; Leslie, Zeller, Wohler, et al. 2004
B14 F. fujikuroi South Korea, rice Jeong et al. 2013
IMI58289 F. fujikuroi Taiwan, rice Wiemann et al. 2013
ITEM 7600 F. verticillioides California, maize Leslie and Dickman 1991

Materials and Methods

Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

For F. fujikuroi FGSC 8932 and KSU X-10626 strains both paired-end and large insert mate pair libraries were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 machine at the University of Missouri’s DNA Core Facility. For (KSU 3668), a single paired-end library was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq machine. Reads were subjected to quality trimming using the Trimmomatic program (Bolger et al. 2014) with default parameters.

Assembly was performed using the Velvet software (Zerbino and Birney 2008) with a comprehensive grid-search employed to optimize assembly parameters. Scaffolding was performed, where mate-pair data were available, using SSPACE (Boetzer and Pirovano 2014).

Gene annotation was performed using the Augustus software (Stanke et al. 2006) with a model trained on Fusarium graminearum (Cuomo et al. 2007) and predicted transcript sequences from F. fujikuroi IMI58289 (Wiemann et al. 2013).

tRNAs were annotated using tRNAscan-SE (Lowe and Eddy 1997) with default parameters. TransposonPsi (available at http://transposonpsi.sourceforge.net/, last accessed February 2015) was used to predict transposons. RepeatMasker (available at http://www.repeatmasker.org, last accessed February 2015) and RepeatScout (Price et al. 2005) were used with standard parameters to predict repeats.

Clusters of Orthologous Genes

All against all BLASTp (Altschul et al. 1990) searches were performed using the BLOSUM80 matrix. Orthology was defined where pairs of genes were each others best reciprocal hits with P value ≤ 1E-5 and where “second-best” hits produce bit scores less than 90% of that associated with the best match.

Genome Alignment, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, and Structural Variation

Genome alignment and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling were performed using MAUVE (Darling et al. 2004) with block size = 50,000, using the IMI58289 (Wiemann et al. 2013) assembly as reference. SNP densities and identity rates were estimated using custom scripts. For analyses of chr IV, MUMmer (Delcher et al. 2002) was used with default parameters other than the minimal match length (50 bp). Inversion frequencies were estimated using MegaBLAST and ad hoc scripts.

Recombination and Phylogenetic Analyses

Hierarchical clustering was performed using the R implementation of the neighbor joining algorithm. The Phi test for recombination was performed on 100 kb windows (sliding by 50 kb) using the profile program from the PhiPack package (Bruen et al. 2006).

Functional Enrichment Analyses

Pfam domains were annotated using the PfamScan script (ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/databases/Pfam/Tools/, last accessed February 2015) with default parameters. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were performed using a custom script implementing a Fisher exact test with the Benjamini–Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction.

Codon Usage

Codon usage analyses were performed using the CodonW suite (Peden 1999).

Results

Genome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

Standard paired-end and mate-pair libraries prepared from strains FGSC 8932 and KSU X-10626 were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument. For KSU 3368, a single paired-end library was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. In all cases, reads were subjected to quality trimming. Contig assembly and scaffolding were performed using Velvet (Zerbino and Birney 2008) and SSPACE (Boetzer and Pirovano 2014) respectively. Assembly, scaffolding, and annotation statistics are presented in table 2, and the final theoretical coverages (number of bases submitted to the assembler divided by published assembly length) were 169× for KSU 3368, 176× for KSU X-10626, and 27× for KSU 3368. The genome sequences are available from GenBank under the accession numbers JRVH00000000 (KSU 3368), JRVG00000000 (KSU X-10626), and JRVF00000000 (FGSC 8932).

Table 2.

Genome Assembly Statistics

FGSC 8932 KSU X-10626 KSU 3368
No. of PE reads 52,460,000 55,010,000 6,343,126
PE insert size (bp) 389 586 410
No. of MP reads 61,332,000 60,803,000 na
MP insert size (kb) 3.09 3.21 na
No. of contigs 1,286 636 2,964
N50 contigs (kb) 27 75 4.5
No. of scaffolds 291 167 2,309
N50 scaffolds (kb) 180 1,020 5.2
Total assembly size (Mb) 43.096 43.11 43.199
No. of predicted protein-coding genes 14,832 14,801 15,188
No. of intact TE 35 38 25
Recently duplicated (Mb) 1.89 1.92 1.91
Alignable with IMI58289 (Mb) 40.9 40.5 41.2
% identity with IMI58289 98.94 98.08 99.4
No. of genes shared with IMI58289 14,566 14,245 14,557
No. of genes shared with B14 14,386 14,574 14,406

Recombination and Sequence Similarity in the Genealogy of F. fujikuroi Genomes

Fusarium fujikuroi is capable of sexual reproduction, and consequently meiotic recombination. However, some isolated F. fujikuroi populations have been reported to undergo predominantly asexual reproduction (Carter et al. 2008). Accordingly, the IMI58289 anchored multiple genome alignment was subjected to the Phi test for recombination, as implemented in the PhiPack software (Bruen et al. 2006). These analyses (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online) strongly suggest that extensive recombination has occurred since the divergence of the isolates under study.

Character-based phylogenetic reconstruction methods are unsuitable for the analysis of data sets where extensive recombination is expected, although hierarchical clustering based on average identity of aligned genome regions (fig. 1) indicates KSU X-10626 is most similar to B14, whereas the Thai isolate KSU 3368 and the FGSC 8932 isolate are more similar to IMI58289. Although both KSU X-10626 and FGSC 8932 are cross-fertile with isolates from both F. fujikuroi and Fusarium proliferatum (Leslie, Zeller, Logrieco, et al. 2004; Leslie, Zeller, Wohler, et al. 2004), our analyses provide no direct support for the hypothesis that these strains are hybrids between these two species. Further resolution of this issue awaits the availability of whole-genome sequences from F. proliferatum.

Fig. 1.—

Fig. 1.—

Hierarchical clustering based on average identity of aligned genome regions. Neighbor Joining tree based on raw genetic distances between alignable regions of F. fujikuroi and F. verticillioides genomes. All internal branches received a 100% bootstrap support.

Synteny and Structural Variation among F. fujikuroi Genomes

Synteny between F. fujikuroi isolates is high, indeed for FGSC 8932 and KSU X-10626, less than 0.30% and 0.43% respectively of the aligned sequence displays inversions or translocations longer than 1 kb with respect to IMI58289. Similar statistics were not generated for KSU 3368 given the fragmented nature of the assembly. Aligned regions show 98.1% (KSU X-10626) to 99.4% (KSU 3368) identity with IMI58289 (table 2).

Although F. fujikuroi IMI58289 is highly syntenous with F. verticillioides, it lacks both extremities of chr IV (for a total of around 1 Mb of DNA encoding around 400 genes) with respect to the latter (Wiemann et al. 2013). While the F. fujikuroi genomes sequenced here, and the B14 strain (Jeong et al. 2013) all have different subtelomeric deletions in chr IV (fig. 2), 80 genes present in these regions in F. verticillioides but absent in IMI58289 are found widely dispersed in the subtelomeric regions of the other available F. fujikuroi genomes. Additional smaller deletions in chr III and VII of IMI58289 (Wiemann et al. 2013) with respect to F. verticillioides are conserved in all F. fujikuroi isolates. A chr V telomeric deletion in IMI58289 has a more complex and interesting pattern of conservation between isolates (see below). Supernumerary chr XII (Wiemann et al. 2013) is present in all of the strains sequenced in this study.

Fig. 2.—

Fig. 2.—

Dot plot representation of alignments between chr IV of F. verticillioides ITEM 7600 and homologous supercontigs from F. fujikuroi isolates. (A) F. fujikuroi IMI58289, (B) F. fujikuroi FGSC 8932, (C) F. fujikuroi KSU X-10626, and (D) F. fujikuroi B14. The plots illustrate the variability of deletions at the termini of chr IV of various F. fujikuroi isolates relative to F. verticillioides. Fusarium fujikuroi KSU 3368 is not represented due to the fragmented nature of the genome assembly.

The mating type genes are conserved in order and orientation in all the isolates on chromosome VI. B14, FGSC 8932, KSU 3368, and IMI58289 are identified as MAT-2 while X-10626 carries the MAT-1 idiomorph.

Duplications and Compositional Patterns

Subtelomeric regions (within 350 kb of the termini of each IMI58289 chromosome) constitute about 18% of the genomes and yet contain 32% of the intraspecific SNPs (0.0625 SNPs per site vs. 0.0225 for the rest of the genome, P (hypergeometric) ≤ 10E-308). They exhibit a marginal (53% vs. 51%), but highly significant (P (hypergeometric) ≤ 10E-308) increase in AT content with respect to the rest of the genome as well as a reduced gene density (0.25 genes per kb vs. 0.38 genes per kb, P (hypergeometric) ≤ 1E-140); 36.7% of subtelomeric DNA is “genic,” while the corresponding figure for the rest of the genome is 47.72%.

Potentially recently duplicated sequences (regions showing greater than 89% identity to other sequences in the same genome) were identified in a sliding window BLASTn analysis (400 bp windows) and constituted up to 2 Mb (5.9%) per genome (table 2). Approximately 42% of this genetic material was associated with genomic loci identified as Transposable Element (TE)-derived.

A distinctly nonuniform frequency distribution of sequence identity levels between duplicated loci (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online) is consistent with past bursts of gene duplication. However, a strong negative correlation between AT content and percentage identity of copies (R-Pearson = 0.5, P value≤ 1E-16)—with regions rich in TE-derived sequences often showing AT content ≥70%—might also be consistent with the action of a Repeat Induced Point mutation (RIP)-like mechanism (Galagan and Selker 2004) in F. fujikuroi genomes. Inactivation of duplicated genes, following meiosis, is known to occur in F. verticillioides (Leslie and Dickman 1991).

Lineage-Specific Genes

Fusarium verticillioides and all F. fujikuroi genomes share 8,199 genes. Another 1,017 genes are species specific (SS), or specific to, and universally present in, the five F. fujikuroi isolates with respect to other available Fusarium genomes. An additional 1,210 genes are lineage specific (LS)—specific to a subset of F. fujikuroi genomes or unique to a single genome, with a maximum of 96 genes being unique to a single F. fujikuroi isolate (FGSC 8932). Both SS and LS genes are enriched in transcription factors, transporters, and genes associated with SM production. Subtelomeric regions are significantly enriched in putative LS and SS genes for all F. fujikuroi isolates (P value (hypergeometric test) ≤1.0E-170). This observation is consistent with previous reports of a subtelomeric bias in LS genes in other fungal species including Aspergillus fumigatus (Nierman et al. 2005), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Zakian 1996), and Pichia stipitis (Jeffries et al. 2007). Codon usage indices suggest that subtelomeric genes use a lower frequency of optimal codons and display a lower codon adaptation index with a higher effective number of codons.

For 176 SS and 216 LS genes, best near full-length matches (covering >50% of the protein sequence) were obtained outside the genus Fusarium, with affinities to Colletotrichum spp. (81 genes), Trichoderma spp. (37 genes) and Aspergillus spp. (32 genes) being the most frequent. These findings are consistent either with widespread independent loss of ancestral genes in many fungal lineages or with recent SS and LS gene acquisition through horizontal gene transfer.

We also identified 496 SS and 547 LS genes with best Blast hits against F. fujikuroi genes previously assigned to other clusters of orthologous genes. Of these genes, 82% retain the same number of introns as their best match, suggesting that they originate from gene duplication rather than from retrotranscription-based mechanisms.

Wiemann et al. (2013) used a custom microarray to profile F. fujikuroi IMI58289 gene expression under varying pH and nitrogen concentrations and conditions designed to simulate plant infection. These data (GEO series accession: GSE43745) indicate that SS genes, with respect to core F. fujikuroi genes, tend to be upregulated under nitrogen-limiting conditions (both acidic and basic) (supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online), which is consistent with roles in infection-related processes (Coleman et al. 1997; Snoeijers et al. 2000).

Comparative Analysis of PKS, NRPS, and Putative Novel SM Biosynthetic Gene Clusters

Wiemann et al. (2013) recently identified gene clusters likely involved in SM production in F. fujikuroi IMI58289. The composition and arrangement of most of these clusters is conserved across all of the F. fujikuroi genomes compared here. All clusters predicted to be complete are potentially active, as they contain no deletions or premature stop codons. Table 3 provides a summary of within F. fujikuroi polymorphism in gene content or arrangement in putative SM gene clusters. The F. fujikuroi FGSC 8932 genome assembly lacks the entire PKS19 cluster. It also lacks seven genes from the fumonisin (PKS11) biosynthetic cluster, including FUM19, the ABC transporter required for toxin synthesis/export. This observation is consistent with the apparent lack of fumonisin production by this isolate (Studt et al. 2012). Fusarium fujikuroi FGSC 8932 also exhibits a rearrangement of the PKS6 (fusaric acid) cluster, whereby the PKS gene is inverted and moved 30 kb away from the rest of the cluster relative to other Fusarium species.

Table 3.

Variation of Putative SM Biosythentic Gene Clusters in F. fujikuroi Isolates

Acidic
Basic
Core Gene ID Gene Symbola SM Product B14 KSU X-10626 FGSC 8932 KSU 3368 IMI58289 UP DW UP DW
FFUJ_03506 NRPS10 Unknown 0b 0b 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
FFUJ_00003 NRPS31 Apicidin-like 2b 2b 11 11 11 0 11 3 3
FFUJ_02105 PKS6 Fusaric acid 5 5 5c 5 5 0 5 0 5
FFUJ_12239 PKS19 Unknown 6 6 0b 6 6 0 3 0 2
FFUJ_09241 PKS11 Fumonisin 15 15 8b 15 15 11 0 7 0
FFUJ_08113 NRPS4 Unknown 3 3 3 2d 3 0 0 0 0
FFUJ_11199 PKS16 Unknown 4 4 3d 4 4 3 0 3 0
LW93_15044 new PKS Unknown 7 7 4 0b 0 b NA NA NA NA

Note.—For each cluster, the number of genes present in each isolate is reported. The number of genes up- (UP) or down- (DW) regulated in IMI 58289 when nitrogen-limiting conditions were applied in acidic or basic media is reported (data from Wiemann et al. [2013]).

aDefined by Weimann et al. (2013) except for the new PKS (LW93_15044), the current work.

bCore gene is absent.

cCluster subject to genomic rearrangement.

dCore gene present, loss of single accessory gene.

Orthologs of the NRPS10 (functionally uncharacterized) and NRPS31 genes of F. fujikuroi IMI58289 (responsible for the production of an apicidin-like compound [Wiemann et al. 2013]) are absent from the F. fujikuroi KSU X-10626 and B14 genomes. The NRPS31 cluster genes, situated close to a telomere on chr I, show high identity with homologs from F. semitectum (Wiemann et al. 2013).

A deletion at the proximal subtelomeric region of chr V of IMI58289 noted by Wiemann et al. (2013), and not involving SM genes is conserved in all isolates studied here. Interestingly, in strains X-10626 and B14 the distal subtelomeric region of the same chromosome contains an additional PKS gene with an associated cluster of six genes, absent from the genome of F. verticillioides, but closely related to a homologous cluster in Fusarium oxysporum (fig. 3). FGSC 8932 retains only four of the genes from this PKS cluster.

Fig. 3.—

Fig. 3.—

Putative novel SM gene cluster present on the distal subtelomeric region of chr V of F. fujikuroi KSU X-10626 and B14. Conservation of a putative novel SM biosynthetic cluster between F. fujikuroi and F. oxysporum isolates, with lack of conservation apparent in F. verticillioides. Genes in blue are present at the subtelomere of all species; the PKS gene is shown in violet with yellow genes representing the presumed accessory components of the cluster. The gray gene in FGSC 8932 is a predicted partial PKS gene recovered as orthologous to the PKS of the novel cluster. The inferred telomeric location of this cluster was derived from synteny of flanking genes with the IMI58289 assembly.

The NRPS4 and PKS16 clusters exhibit apparent deletions of one gene in single isolates (although the NRPS and PKS genes, respectively, are present). Subtelomeric regions are enriched for SM clusters (P value ≤ 1E-22) and contain 23 clusters, (including five of the eight variable clusters displayed in table 3). Among these clusters, only PKS11 (fumonisin) and PKS16 (uncharacterized compound) show consistent upregulation under nitrogen-limiting conditions (table 3, data from Wiemann et al. [2013]). Fumonisin production by F. verticillioides is required for development of foliar disease symptoms on maize seedlings (Glenn et al. 2008). Wiemann et al. (2013) showed that F. fujikuroi can produce only very limited amounts of the toxin compared with F. verticillioides, suggesting that the production of fumonisin by F. fujikuroi may not be essential for its pathogenesis of rice. The PKS16 cluster contains only four genes and is poorly characterized with respect to its function and the SM it produces. FFUJ_11198, the gene which is absent from this cluster in FGSC 8932, contains a serine hydrolase domain (PFAM03959) and is upregulated in nitrogen-limiting conditions. Expression data from Wiemann et al. (2013) for the 37 conserved SM gene clusters are reported in supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online.

Discussion

Comparative genomic analyses of geographically distinct F. fujikuroi isolates reveal, as proposed for other phylogenetically distant fungi (Zakian 1996; Nierman et al. 2005; Jeffries et al. 2007) that both sequence variability and the presence of LS and SS genes are concentrated in subtelomeric regions. LS and SS gene sets are enriched in transcription factors, transporters, and genes associated with SM production. Furthermore, publicly available expression data indicate that many of these genes are upregulated under nitrogen-limiting conditions. Focused generation of genetic diversity in subtelomeric regions may thus be particularly important for allowing the fungus to rapidly adapt to changing environments and host colonization. Indeed, our analyses suggest that gene duplication events are concentrated in these genomic regions although rapid divergence of recently duplicated sequences is likely driven by a RIP-like mechanism. These observations notwithstanding, the identification of nearly 400 LS and SS genes that recover best matches outside the genus Fusarium may suggest a role for HGT in the evolution of F. fujikuroi.

Although SM clusters are for the most part conserved within the species, X-10626 and B14 strains possess a PKS cluster absent from both F. verticillioides and other F. fujikuroi strains but present in F. oxysporum. This and several other differences in SM cluster gene content are most parsimoniously explained by gene loss events. Our data confirm recent comparative genome analyses indicating that Fusarium and other filamentous fungi have the genetic potential to produce many more SMs than previously thought (Ma et al. 2013).

The novel F. fujikuroi genome sequences presented here will provide an important resource for comparative and gene expression studies in this economically important pathogen. More generally, our findings underline the likely importance of distinctive evolutionary mechanisms in the generation of diversity among pathogenic fungi. Additional investigations into these mechanisms represent high priorities from both basic and applied standpoints.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Ministero dell’Economia e Finanza (Italy) through the CNR project CISIA “Innovazione e sviluppo del Mezzogiorno-Conoscenze Integrate per la Sostenibilità ed Innovazione del Made in Italy Agroalimentare”—Legge n. 191/2009; by Ministero dell’Istruzione, Università e Ricerca (Italy), project PONa3_00025 “BioforIU: Infrastruttura multidisciplinare per lo studio e la valorizzazione della Biodiversità marina e terrestre nella prospettiva della Innovation Union”; and by the Molecular Biodiversity Laboratory (MoBiLab) of the LifeWatch ESFRI infrastructure, Bari, Italy. This is contribution no. 15-153-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and was supported by funding from the National Agricultural Biosecurity Center at Kansas State University.

Literature Cited

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215:403–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avalos J, Cerdá-Olmedo E, Reyes F, Barrero AF. 2007. Gibberellins and other metabolites of Fusarium fujikuroi and related fungi. Curr Org Chem. 11:721–737. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrero AF, et al. 1991. Fusarin C and 8Z-fusarin C from Gibberella fujikuroi. Phytochemistry 30:2259–2263. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boetzer M, Pirovano W. 2014. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15:211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic:a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–21120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruen T, Phillipe H, Bryant D. 2006. A quick and robust statistical test to detect the presence of recombination. Genetics 172:2665–2681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carter LLA, Leslie JF, Webster RK. 2008. Population structure of Fusarium fujikuroi from California rice and water grass. Phytopathology 98:992–998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coleman M, Henricot B, Arnau J, Oliver RP. 1997. Starvation-induced genes of the tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum are also induced during growth in planta. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 10:1106–1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cuomo CA, et al. 2007. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science 317:1400–1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 14:1394–1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Delcher AL, Phillippy A, Carlton J, Salzberg SL. 2002. Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2478–2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Desjardins AE, et al. 2000. Fusarium species from nepalese rice and production of mycotoxins and gibberellic acid by selected species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 66:1020–1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Galagan JE, Selker EU. 2004. RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defense. Trends Genet. 20:417–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glenn AE, et al. 2008. Transformation-mediated complementation of a FUM gene cluster deletion in Fusarium verticillioides restores both fumonisin production and pathogenicity on maize seedlings. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1:87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harvey RB, et al. 1997. Moniliformin from Fusarium fujikuroi culture material and deoxynivalenol from naturally contaminated wheat incorporated into diets of broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 41:957–963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hsieh WH, Smith SN, Snyder WC. 1977. Mating groups in Fusarium moniliforme .Phytopathology 67:1041–1043. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeffries TW, et al. 2007. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose-bioconverting and xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Nat Biotechnol. 25:319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeong H, Lee S, Choi GJ, Lee T, Yun SH. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Fusarium fujikuroi B14, the causal agent of the bakanae disease of rice. Genome Announc. 1:pii:e00035–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuhlman EG. 1982. Varieties of Gibberella fujikuroi with anamorphs in Fusarium section Liseola. Mycologia 74:759–768. [Google Scholar]
  20. Leslie JF, Dickman MB. 1991. Fate of DNA encoding hygromycin resistance after meiosis in transformed strains of Gibberella fujikuroi (Fusarium moniliforme). Appl Environ Microbiol. 57:1423–1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Leslie JF, Summerell BA. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Ames (IA): Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  22. Leslie JF, Zeller KA, Logrieco A, et al. 2004. Species diversity of and toxin production by Gibberella fujikuroi species complex strains isolated from native prairie grasses in Kansas. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:2254–2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leslie JF, Zeller KA, Wohler M, Summerell BA. 2004. Interfertility of two mating populations in the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex: molecular diversity and PCR-detection of toxigenic Fusarium species and Ochratoxigenic Fungi. Eur J Plant Pathol. 110:611–618. [Google Scholar]
  24. Linnemannstons P, et al. 2002. The polyketide synthase gene pks4 from Gibberella fujikuroi encodes a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of the red pigment bikaverin. Fungal Genet Biol. 37:134–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma LJ, et al. 2013. Fusarium pathogenomics. Annu Rev Microbiol. 67:399–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marasas WF, et al. 1988. Leukoencephalomalacia in a horse induced by fumonisin B1 isolated from Fusarium moniliforme. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 55:197–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nierman WC, et al. 2005. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 438:1151–1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peden JF. 1999. Analysis of codon usage. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham. [Google Scholar]
  30. Prado MM, Prado-Cabrero A, Fernandez-Martin R, Avalos J. 2004. A gene of the opsin family in the carotenoid gene cluster of Fusarium fujikuroi. Curr Genet. 46:47–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Price AL, Jones NC, Pevzner PA. 2005. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21 (Suppl 1):i351–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Proctor RH, Plattner RD, Brown DW, Seo JA, Lee YW. 2004. Discontinuous distribution of fumonisin biosynthetic genes in the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycol Res. 108:815–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rademacher W. 1997. Gibberellins. In: Anke T, editor. Fungal biotechnology. London (United Kingdom): Chapman and Hall; p. 193–205. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodriguez-Ortiz R, Limon MC, Avalos J. 2013. Functional analysis of the carS gene of Fusarium fujikuroi. Mol Genet Genomics. 288:157–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Snoeijers SS, Perez-Garcia A, Joosten MHAJ, De Wit PJGM. 2000. The effect of nitrogen on disease development and gene expression in bacterial and fungal pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol. 106:493–506. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stanke M, Tzvetkova A, Morgenstern B. 2006. AUGUSTUS at EGASP: using EST, protein and genomic alignments for improved gene prediction in the human genome. Genome Biol. 7(Suppl 1):S11 11–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Studt L, et al. 2012. Segregation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis in hybrids of Fusarium fujikuroi and Fusarium proliferatum. Fungal Genet Biol. 49:567–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sunder S, Satyavir 1998. Vegetative compatibility, biosynthesis of GA3 and virulence of Fusarium moniliforme isolates from bakanae disease of rice. Plant Pathol. 47:767–772. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tudzynski B. 1999. Biosynthesis of gibberellins in Gibberella fujikuroi: biomolecular aspects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 52:298–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tudzynski B. 2005. Gibberellin biosynthesis in fungi: genes, enzymes, evolution, and impact on biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 66:597–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wiemann P, et al. 2013. Deciphering the cryptic genome: genome-wide analyses of the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi reveal complex regulation of secondary metabolism and novel metabolites. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zakian VA. 1996. Structure, function, and replication of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. Annu Rev Genet. 30:141–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Genome Biology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES