Significance
Oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are important drug targets in the clinical setting. While RTK inhibitors have become important tools in the clinic, as has been demonstrated with chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), drug resistance invariably develops. The tools and rationale for the treatment of RTK drug resistance are limited, and success is of short duration. The identification of secondary intracellular drug targets is thus of critical importance. By using new Kit-GIST mouse models in which specific Kit signaling cascades are inhibited, we show the importance of PI3 kinase signaling in tumor development, as well as the utility of PI3 kinase inhibition in the treatment of primary and imatinib-resistant GIST. These studies provide a rationale for targeting dominant molecular pathways in tumors driven by oncogenic kinases.
Keywords: GIST, Kit, PI3K, mouse
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) predominantly harbor activating mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT. To genetically dissect in vivo the requirement of different signal transduction pathways emanating from KIT for tumorigenesis, the oncogenic KitV558Δ mutation was combined with point mutations abrogating specific phosphorylation sites on KIT. Compared with single-mutant KitV558Δ/+ mice, double-mutant KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F knock-in mice lacking the SRC family kinase-binding site on KIT (pY567) exhibited attenuated MAPK signaling and tumor growth. Surprisingly, abrogation of the PI3K-binding site (pY719) in KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice prevented GIST development, although the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), the cells of origin of GIST, were normal. Pharmacologic inhibition of the PI3K pathway in tumor-bearing KitV558Δ/+ mice with the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib, the pan-PI3K inhibitor pilaralisib, and the PI3K-alpha–restricted inhibitor alpelisib each diminished tumor proliferation. The addition of the MEK inhibitor PD-325901 or binimetinib further decreased downstream KIT signaling. Moreover, combining PI3K and MEK inhibition was effective against imatinib-resistant KitV558Δ;T669I/+ tumors.
Targeted therapies have revolutionized cancer care, but the rapidity with which resistance to single-agent treatments develops has unsettled the field. Often the mechanism of resistance is further mutation of the originally targeted oncogene, as occurs with ABL1T315I, KITT670I, EGFRT790M, and ALKL1196M. Thus, key protumorigenic signals must be emanating from these “oncogenic drivers.” To date, however, the contribution of individual signal transduction sites on oncogenic drivers has not been dissected using endogenously encoded oncogenes in fully immunocompetent, genetically engineered models of cancer.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) derive from mesenchymal pacemaker cells of the gastrointestinal tract known as interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) or their progenitors (1, 2). The receptor tyrosine kinase KIT is essential for the development of ICCs, and KIT-activating mutations are detected in the majority of GISTs (1, 3, 4). The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate is approved for first-line treatment of advanced GIST. as well as for adjuvant treatment following resection of KIT-positive GIST (5). Despite the early clinical success of imatinib for the treatment of GIST, it is rarely curative, with the main outcome being partial response or stable disease, requiring lifelong therapy (6). In addition, imatinib resistance frequently arises from second-site mutations in Kit (7, 8).
We previously generated a mouse model of GIST that carries the KitV558Δ mutation, which is prototypical for Kit exon 11 mutations found in both spontaneous and familial GIST (9, 10). We also engineered imatinib-resistant KitV558Δ;T669I/+ mice that model the human “gatekeeper mutation” KitT670I (7, 8, 11). Both mouse models develop gastric and colonic ICC hyperplasia and cecal GIST by histology and aberrant activation of SRC family kinase (SFK), PI3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/S6, STAT3, and MAPK/ERK signal transduction pathways indistinguishable from human GIST (10–13). While these findings confirm the central and persistent role of KIT in the pathogenesis of GIST, they also highlight the need to identify other targets to improve clinical outcomes per se and provide the means to prevent or overcome the emergence of resistant clones. As aberrant KIT signaling is essential for most GISTs, we aimed to identify the proximal downstream targets critical for tumor development and/or maintenance.
Kit gain-of-function mutations are also found in neoplasms of the hematopoietic system, such as in mast cells and myeloid cells. In contrast to Kit mutations in GIST, which typically are weak gain-of-function mutations, Kit gain-of-function mutations in the hematopoietic system are strong mutations typically arising in the activation loop of the Kit kinase. This appears to be the result of the activation by KIT of a negative regulator of PI3K, SHIP1, in hematopoietic lineages. In agreement with this idea, SHIP1 loss-of-function mice display mast cell hyperplasia (14).
The receptor tyrosine kinase KIT contains 22 cytoplasmic tyrosine phosphorylation sites that are conserved between mouse and humans. Normal and oncogenic kinase activity of KIT results in their phosphorylation and the recruitment of a multitude of signal transducers to one or more of these docking sites on KIT. Depending on the cellular context, this signal transduction process elicits various biological responses, such as cell survival, proliferation, secretion, and migration. Two phosphorylation sites have been extensively studied in the nononcogenic setting. The phospho-Y567 (pY567) site, among other signaling intermediates, interacts with the SFKs (15, 16), STAT3, and GRB2 (17), while phospho-Y719 (pY719) is the sole site on KIT for the recruitment of PI3K family members (18, 19).
We and others have studied the individual contributions of pY567 and pY719 to nononcogenic KIT signal transduction and, ultimately, cellular fate decisions using knock-in mouse models. Generally, KIT is essential for melanogenesis, hematopoiesis, and gametogenesis. KitY567F/Y567F mice specifically lacking the KITY567 phosphorylation site exhibit minor pigmentation changes and an age-dependent differentiation block in pro-B and pro-T cells, an erythroblast-intrinsic defect in stress erythropoiesis, but normal fertility (20–22). In contrast, KitY719F/Y719F mice lacking the KITY719 phosphorylation site have normal pigmentation and hematopoiesis, but males are sterile and females have defective ovarian follicle maturation (20, 23–25). Importantly, while KIT signaling is required in the ICC lineage, KIT-mediated SFK or PI3K signaling is dispensable, since both KitY567F/Y567F and KitY719F/Y719F mice show normal ICC development (4, 22, 26).
The individual downstream KIT signaling pathways required for the oncogenic transformation of ICCs and GIST maintenance are unknown, however. Identification of vital pathways could provide additional strategies to enhance the efficacy of existing therapies or to circumvent imatinib resistance. Thus, double–knock-in mouse models were generated combining the oncogenic KitV558Δ mutation with either the KitY567F or the KitY719F mutation in the endogenous Kit locus. Vital pathways identified with this approach were then targeted by specific inhibitors in both our imatinib-sensitive and imatinib-resistant mouse models to translate the genetic findings.
Results
PI3K, but Not SFK, Is Required for ICC Hyperplasia and GIST Oncogenesis.
To dissect the in vivo contribution of individual signal transduction pathways emanating from oncogenic KIT, we genetically abrogated the SFK-binding site pY567 or the PI3-kinase binding site pY719 in the KITV558Δ oncoprotein by substituting the tyrosine to phenylalanine (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1). Heterozygosity for the KitV558Δ allele is sufficient to induce GIST development, while homozygosity causes perinatal lethality in mice (10). Because KIT dimerizes, homozygous phenylalanine substitutions were necessary to abrogate signaling from the specified tyrosines. KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F mice were viable and had longer survival than KitV558Δ/+ and KitV558Δ;T669I/+ mice, while KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice had a normal lifespan (Fig. 1B). KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F mice developed GIST in the cecum that was histologically similar to KitV558Δ/+ tumors, but significantly smaller. KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F mice had less ICC hyperplasia in the stomach and colon (Fig. 1C, compare d and f with g and i) and less distention of the ileum from tumor obstruction, likely accounting for their longer survival (Fig. 2 A–C). Meanwhile, KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice (n = 14) up to 29 mo of age did not develop GIST. Histological analysis revealed normal morphology of the stomach, cecum, and colon, with a normal density of ICCs in the myenteric plexus (Fig. 1C, j–l).
KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F Tumors Have Disrupted SFK Signaling.
While KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F mice had a smaller tumor and lived longer than KitV558Δ mice, KitV558Δ;Y567F/+ mice with a wild-type (WT) Kit allele had a shorter lifespan than KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F mice, indicating that one dose of KITY567 signaling affected survival (Fig. 2D). Similarly, increasing the oncogenic dose in KitV558Δ;Y567F/V558Δ ;Y567F mice further reduced survival despite disruption of KITY567 signaling, confirming that signaling from other KIT tyrosines contributed to KIT signaling in GIST (Fig. 2D).
To verify the impaired SFK signaling in KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors, we performed IHC and Western blot analysis. KIT staining was uniformly high in KitV558Δ/+ and KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors (Fig. 2E, b and c), while adjacent mucosal tissues, lymphoid follicles, and remaining intervening fibers of smooth muscles lacked KIT staining, as expected. Notably, KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors were more heterogeneous, with remaining muscle fibers and fibrotic areas present. Importantly, S6 phosphorylation, a downstream indicator of PI3K activation, was equally high in KitV558Δ/+ and KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors (Fig. 2E, e and f). In contrast, phosphorylation of MAPK, and to a lesser extent STAT3, was diminished in KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F GIST lesions (Fig. 2E, h, i, k, and l). Imatinib treatment of KitV558Δ/+ mice for 6 h reduced S6, MAPK1/3, and STAT3 phosphorylation without altering KIT expression (Fig. 2E, a, d, g, and j), consistent with our previous studies (11–13). In contrast, MAPK1/3 phosphorylation was at an intermediate level in untreated KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors, indicating that SFK partially contributed to MAPK activation (Fig. 2E, g–i).
Western blot analysis further confirmed similar PI3K pathway activation in untreated KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F and KitV558Δ/+ tumors, as demonstrated by phosphorylation of S6 and 4E-BP1 (Fig. 2 F and G). Again, phospho-MAPK1/3 (ERK1/2) was reduced in KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors. SFK pathway activation was greatly reduced, as expected, but phospho-STAT3 was greatly reduced as well (Fig. 2 F and G). Taken together, our findings indicate that the oncogenic KitV558Δ mutation combined with the KitY567F mutation did not affect PI3K signaling, but reduced the MAPK and STAT3 pathways and almost abrogated SFK activation.
Kit Kinase Is Functional in KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F Mice.
The gastrointestinal tract in KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice appeared normal, with normal stomach, cecum, and colon morphology. KIT immunohistochemistry revealed normal morphology and density of myenteric and intramuscular ICCs (Figs. 1C, j–l and 3 A and B). The absence of GIST in KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice explained their normal lifespan (Fig. 1B). Remarkably, KitV558Δ;Y719F/+ mice (harboring one WT Kit allele) also had a normal lifespan and did not develop GIST (Fig. 3C), which was surprising, given our assumption that mutant KIT protein could form heterodimers with WT KIT (KIT+-KITV558∆;Y719F) and activate the PI3K moiety of WT KIT. Furthermore, KitV558Δ;Y719F/V558Δ;Y719F mice homozygous for both mutations had an extended lifespan and failed to develop GIST. These results suggest that PI3K signaling is critical for GIST oncogenesis, and that even partial abrogation of PI3K recruitment to KIT is sufficient to prevent tumorigenesis, regardless of KIT oncogene dosage. Thus, PI3K may be a desirable candidate for pharmacologic targeting without the requirement for complete Kit inhibition.
While KitV558Δ/+, KitV558Δ;T669I/+, KitY567F/Y567F, and KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F mice are fertile, KitY719F/Y719F mice showed a distinct blockage in spermatogenesis (24). Thus, we asked whether addition of the gain-of-function mutation KitV558Δ to the KitY719F/Y719F mutation might rescue azoospermia. We found that KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice recapitulated the testis phenotype of KitY719F/Y719F mice. Matings with multiple WT females over more than 6 mo did not produce offspring, testicular volume was reduced, and testis cross-sections revealed empty tubules (Fig. 3D). As was the case with survival, increasing the oncogenic dose in KitV558Δ;Y719F/V558Δ;Y719F mice was not sufficient to compensate for the loss of KITY719, indicating the need for at least one Y719 phosphorylation site for spermatogenesis. KIT is also known to have roles in hematopoiesis and mast cell development, and Kit mutant mice often present with a blood and/or mast cell phenotype. Skin mast cell numbers are increased in KitV558Δ mice, while KitV558Δ;T669I/+ mice develop mast cell hyperplasia and microcytic erythrocytosis (10, 11). Nevertheless, in this study, the KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice had normal peripheral blood and skin mast cell levels.
Even though KitV558∆ is a potent oncogene and KitY719F only affects PI3K activation in mice, we cannot exclude the possibility that when both KitV558∆ and KitY719F mutations reside on the same allele, the protein does not fold properly, thereby inactivating KIT (10, 24). However, since KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice have normal ICCs and pigmentation, it is likely that KIT is functional. Given that Kit-null is perinatal lethal (27), the strongest in vivo evidence that this combination does not cause any severe KIT functional defects is our ability to derive viable adult mice homozygous for the KitV558Δ;Y719F allele. To confirm that the KIT kinase is functional in the KitV558Δ;Y719F mutation, we performed an in vitro kinase assay using cells expressing full-length KIT mutants. At baseline, without the addition of KIT ligand (KitL), KITV558∆;Y719F kinase activity was significantly higher than WT KIT activity and similar to that of the KITV558∆ mutant (Fig. 3E). Both mutants were hypersensitive to increasing doses of KitL compared with WT KIT.
To further confirm that KITV558∆;Y719F is functional, and to assess whether it is capable of canonical transphosphorylation, we transfected Kit constructs containing the WT, V558∆, or V558∆;Y719F mutations into 293T cells and measured KIT autophosphorylation by detection of specific KIT phosphotyrosine residues. The WT KIT receptor showed weak Y719 phosphorylation and barely detectable Y567/9 phosphorylation, similar to empty vector (Fig. 3F), consistent with the absence of KitL. The weak phosphorylation of Y719 was most likely due to KIT overexpression leading to random dimerization of receptors. In contrast, the KITV558∆ mutant had a net increase in both Y719 and Y567/9 phosphorylation, in accordance with its constitutive kinase activity. As expected, the KITV558∆;Y719F mutant lacked Y719 phosphorylation, but exhibited levels of Y567 and Y569 phosphorylation comparable to those of the KITV558∆ mutant (Fig. 3F), indicating functional kinase activity of KITV558∆;Y719F. Cotransfection of KITV558∆;Y719F with WT KIT showed weak phosphorylation of Y719 in addition to Y567/9, confirming that KITV558∆;Y719F has canonical kinase activity in trans. In this combination, only WT KIT possessed a Y719 site, and its phosphorylation, at least the lower band, resulted from the presence of the mutant KITV558∆;Y719F, since Y719 phosphorylation of the lower band did not occur in the “WT-only” KIT lane.
To confirm that KITV558∆;Y719F is functional when expressed at endogenous levels, primary cultures of bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) were derived from WT, KitV558/+, and KitV558Δ;Y719F/+ mice (Fig. 3G). At baseline, the WT and mutant KIT proteins were barely phosphorylated at KITY719 and KITY567/569. The addition of KitL increased phosphorylation to a greater degree in the mutants than in the WT, indicating that the mutants are hypersensitive to KitL stimulation and essentially confirming that the KITV558∆;Y719F mutant protein is functional.
Taken together, these results indicate that the kinase in the KITV558∆;Y719F mutant is functional and even constitutively active, like KITV558∆. Therefore, the absence of GIST in KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice is not due to a defect of the double-mutant KIT kinase, but rather must be explained by the lack of KIT pY719 signaling.
Response to Pharmacologic Inhibition of PI3K and MAPK in KitV558Δ/+ Mice.
Because PI3K signaling from KIT was required for GIST formation, we investigated whether selective pharmacologic inhibition of PI3K was effective against established tumors in KitV558Δ/+ mice. We first tested the broadly acting dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib (XL765). Tumor lysates from mice treated for 6 h showed decreased PI3K signaling, manifested by reductions in pAKT, pS6, and p4EBP1 (Fig. 4A). KIT and STAT3 phosphorylation were not affected, but, surprisingly, MAPK phosphorylation was increased. Seven days of treatment reduced tumor cell proliferation by 70% (Fig. 4B), although the histological response was minimal (Fig. 4C, c). To counteract MAPK activation by voxtalisib, we sought to use a MAPK inhibitor. The MEK inhibitor PD-325901 inhibited MAPK signaling without affecting PI3K and STAT signaling, but did not alter tumor proliferation (Fig. 4 B and D). Treatment with voxtalisib and PD325901 for 6 h reduced both PI3K and MAPK signaling, as well as phospho-STAT3 signaling (Fig. 4E). However, toxicity during 7 d of therapy required dosage reductions of both drugs to 5 mg/kg. Notably, low-dose voxtalisib and PD325901 therapy reduced tumor cell proliferation to a comparable degree as high-dose voxtalisib monotherapy (Fig. 4B), although the histological response was minimal (Fig. 4C, d). Taken together, these results indicate that targeting PI3K with the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib reduces tumor cell proliferation, but up-regulation of MAPK signaling might limit its efficacy.
The MAPK activation with voxtalisib therapy likely results from a feedback loop due to mTOR inhibition (28). Therefore, to avoid MAPK activation, we next assessed the pan-class I PI3K selective inhibitor pilaralisib (XL147), which does not inhibit mTOR and thus more closely resembles the genetic abrogation of PI3K signaling from KIT. Tumor lysates from KitV558Δ/+ mice treated for 4 h with pilaralisib showed decreased PI3K signaling with reduced pAKT, pS6, and p4EBP1 (Fig. 5A). In contrast, phosphorylated KIT, STAT3, and MAPK were unaffected (Fig. 5 A and B). IHC of tumors following 7 d of pilaralisib treatment revealed a lack of phosphorylated S6, no effect on MAPK1/3 or STAT3 activation (Fig. 5C), and reduced proliferation, yet only a minimal histological response (Fig. 4 B and C, e).
Because KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F tumors have less MAPK signaling and are smaller than KitV558Δ/+ tumors, we reasoned that pilaralisib might be more effective if combined with a MAPK inhibitor. Thus, we treated KitV558Δ/+ mice with the MEK inhibitor PD-325901 in addition to pilaralisib. After 6 h of treatment, PI3K and MAPK signaling were reduced, as was STAT3 signaling (Fig. 5D). Unfortunately, combination therapy was too toxic over 7 d of therapy.
Since voxtalisib and pilaralisib in combination with PD-325901 were not well tolerated, we evaluated other PI3K and MEK inhibitors. Alpelisib is a potent PIK3CA (PI3K-α) inhibitor, with minimal effects on PIK3CB (PI3K-β), PIK3CD (PI3K-δ), or PIK3CG (PI3K-γ). KitV558Δ/+ mice treated for 7 d with alpelisib had decreased PI3K signaling with reduced pAKT, pS6, and p4EBP1, while KIT, MAPK, and STAT3 activation were unchanged (Fig. 6A). Mice treated for 7 d with the ATP noncompetitive MEK inhibitor binimetinib had less pMAPK1/3 (Fig. 6B). pSTAT3 was also reduced, but PI3K signaling was unaltered. The combination of alpelisib and binimetinib was well tolerated and reduced PI3K pathway activation, pMAPK1/3, and pSTAT3 (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, tumor cell proliferation was reduced by 75%, while the histological response was slightly improved (Fig. 4 B and C, f).
Imatinib-Resistant KitV558Δ;T669I/+ Tumors Respond to Dual PI3K and MEK Inhibition.
Since alpelisib and binimetinib were found to target two major signaling pathways downstream of KIT and to lack toxicity in KitV558Δ/+ mice, we evaluated whether they could be used in combination to overcome imatinib resistance. For this purpose, imatinib-resistant KitV558Δ;T669I/+ mice (11) were treated for 7 d with alpelisib and binimetinib. Both PI3K and MAPK signaling were reduced, as was tumor cell proliferation (Fig. 7 A and B). Furthermore, the histological response was increased (Fig. 7C). Thus, targeting downstream components of KIT signaling was also effective in the setting of imatinib resistance.
Discussion
Here we engineered double-mutant mice carrying both the oncogenic KitV558∆ mutation and the KitY567F or the KitY719F mutation on the same allele. Mice carrying the KitV558∆;567F allele developed smaller GIST lesions than the KitV558∆ mutant mice, indicating that signal transducers that bind to KITY567 have a role in tumor growth. By crossing KitV558∆;567F/+ mice with our previously developed single-mutant KitY567F/+ mice, we generated double-mutant compound heterozygous KitV558∆;Y567F/Y567F mice that are homozygous for the Y567F mutation, to ensure that any signal that normally emanates from phospho-Y567 is abrogated. SFK activation was dramatically impaired in GIST of the KitV558∆;Y567F/Y567F mice compared with the KitV558∆/+ mice. This is consistent with an important role for SFKs in KIT-mediated activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway (15). In addition, we observed a partial reduction in STAT3 signaling in tumors of KitV558∆;Y567F/Y567F mice (29). In mast cell/myeloid cell transformation by oncogenic Kit, Y567F mutation accelerated tumorigenesis, presumably due to inhibited activation of SHIP1, a hematopoietic-specific negative regulator of PI3K (14, 17, 30). In contrast, in KitV558∆;Y567F/Y567F mice, the Y567F mutation diminished tumorigenesis, indicating that KITpY567 is a positive regulator of tumorigenesis in GIST. Since a mild hematopoietic pro-B/pro T-cell phenotype in KITY567F/Y567F mutant mice becomes apparent after age 8 mo, biochemical analysis of tumor tissue was performed in tumors from 3- to 4-mo-old mice (20, 22).
Importantly, our results provide in vivo evidence that the direct activation of the PI3K-pathway via KITY719 is required for GIST tumorigenesis. The KITY719 phosphorylation site also has been postulated to be of importance in myeloproliferative disease induced by the kinase domain mutation KITD814V (human KITD816V), based on experiments with chimeric proteins consisting of the extracellular domain of human M-CSFR and the intracellular domain of murine KIT (18, 31). We considered the possibility of defective ICC development in KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice, which would readily explain the absence of hyperplasia and tumor development, as ICCs or their progenitors are the presumed cells of origin of GIST (32). However, ICCs developed normally and stained positive for KIT. In addition, the kinase activity of the KITV558Δ;Y719F protein was not impaired, strengthening the idea that disruption of PI3K signaling is responsible for the lack of tumor development. The mutant KIT alleles were expressed under the control of the endogenous Kit transcription machinery and thus expressed continuously during ICC development; that is, the experiments did not distinguish whether the phenotypes derived were due to a failure in tumor initiation or a failure in maintaining an oncogenic state. Also, KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F mice lacked the PI3K-binding site in all KIT-expressing cells starting at fertilization. Thus, we cannot rule out that the absence of tumorigenesis in our model could be the result of a defect in tumor initiation.
In addition, it is possible that proteins other than PI3K-family members are being recruited to the phospho-KITY719 site and are necessary for transformation. Nevertheless, pharmacologic inhibitors of the PI3K pathway in tumor-bearing KitV558Δ/+ mice, including the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib, the pan-PI3K inhibitor pilaralisib, and the PI3K-alpha–restricted inhibitor alpelisib, each diminished tumor proliferation, indicating that PI3 kinase makes a major contribution to tumor cell proliferation in established GIST. The presumed selectivity of these inhibitors for PI3K was generally confirmed in our mice, since phosphorylation of S6 kinase and 4EBP1 were inhibited, while MAPK and STAT3 activation were unaffected. The dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib increased MAPK activation in GIST. This is consistent with reports that mTORC1 inhibition promotes MAPK activation in a mouse model of prostate cancer and in patients with metastatic disease subjected to mTOR inhibition therapy (28). The feedback activation of MAPK with voxtalisib provided a rationale for using an MEK inhibitor in combination with a PI3K inhibitor.
In contrast to mice carrying the KitV558Δ;Y719F/Y719F double mutation, mice carrying a KitV558Δ;Y567F/Y567F double mutation developed GIST, although tumor development was attenuated and the animals had an extended lifespan. In these animals, PI3K signaling was not affected, but SFK pathway activation was strongly diminished, and phospho-MAPK1/3 and phospho-STAT3 were reduced as well. In agreement with those observations, treatment of KitV558Δ/+ mice with the MEK inhibitors PD-325901 or binimetinib diminished MAPK1/3 and STAT3 phosphorylation/activation. These findings indicate a requirement for the direct engagement of distinct pathways by KIT for full tumor growth. Thus, dual inhibition of both the PI3K and MAPK branches in oncogenic KIT signaling was pursued. Whereas combination treatment with either voxtalisib plus PD-325901 or pilaralisib plus PD-325901 was too toxic, combination treatment with the PI3K-alpha inhibitor alpelisib and the MAPK inhibitor binimetinib was tolerated and shows promise for use in patients with GIST, particularly those with imatinib-resistant GIST, as demonstrated in imatinib-resistant gatekeeper KitV558Δ;T669I/+ mice. PI3K inhibitors alone and in combination with imatinib have shown antitumor effects in GIST xenograft models; however, the most common imatinib-resistant GIST mutations (KIT exons 11–13 and 11–14) have not been tested (33, 34). Targeting of the PI3K pathway with the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 has been shown to increase imatinib efficacy in cell culture and in xenografts with imatinib-sensitive and -resistant GIST cell lines (35). Our studies with immunocompetent mice carrying either the KitV558Δ or the common KIT imatinib-resistant gatekeeper mutation strengthen our argument that the combination of PI3K and MEK inhibition could be beneficial for treating patients with imatinib-resistant GIST.
In summary, our results suggest that a detailed analysis of distinct oncogenic signaling pathways mediated by oncogenic tyrosine kinases in specific cellular contexts may lead to new and improved treatment strategies.
Materials and Methods
Generation of Mouse Strains.
The V558Δ mutation was introduced by site-directed mutagenesis into a 2.1-kb EcoRI/MluI fragment across Kit exons 9–11 from a 129/SvJ mouse library (24) serving as the 5′ homology arm of the targeting vector. For the KitV558Δ;Y567F allele, the Y567F mutation was introduced into the same 5′ arm for homologous recombination (HR) (Fig. S1). The 5′ HR arm was linked 3′ to a floxed neomycin-resistance (NEO) gene expression cassette. The 3′ HR arm for the KitV558Δ;Y567F allele was a 1.3-kb MluI/BsrGI-NcoI fragment across exons 12–13 (Fig. S1). For the KitV558Δ;Y719F allele, this arm was elongated by the 3′ directly neighboring 129/SvJ genomic DNA, a 2.1-kb BsrGI-NcoI/BamHI fragment including exon 14, and a 3.8-kb BamHI fragment across exons 15–17 including the Y719F mutation in exon 15. The final targeting vector was completely sequenced before linearization and electroporation into CJ7 ES cells (36).
Screening of BamHI-digested genomic DNA from 288 ES cell clones each by Southern blot analysis with a 3′ external probe across Kit exon 14 or a 5′ external probe across Kit exon 8 yielded 17 (5.9%) and 19 (6.6%) positive clones for the KitV558Δ;Y567F and KitV558Δ;Y719F projects, respectively. Four ES cell clones carried both the V558Δ mutation and the nearby Y567F mutation, and two clones carried both the V558Δ mutation and the distant Y719F mutation, respectively, as assessed by sequencing, and showed a normal karyotype. C57BL/6J blastocyst injections of two of these clones each gave rise to 19/21 high-grade chimeras (>90% agouti coat color), one each of which gave germ line transmission of the double mutations. After crossing to C57BL/6J mice, in all agouti F1 animals heterozygous for the NEO allele, the presence of the V558Δ;Y56F and V558Δ;Y719F mutations, and the integrity of both loxP sites was confirmed by sequencing. To remove the floxed NEO cassette, F1 KitV558Δ;Y567F-NEO/+ and KitV558Δ;Y719F-NEO/+ males were bred to B6.FVB-Tg(EIIa-cre) C5379Lmgd/J females (The Jackson Laboratory).
Genotyping PCR was performed across the original intron 11 MluI site, which was replaced by a 134-bp loxP scar in the case of the targeted alleles. Of the two resulting fragments (WT allele, 643 bp; targeted allele, 777 bp), the longer one was isolated by gel purification, and the integrity of the V558Δ mutation (and in case of the KitV558Δ;Y567F allele, of the adjacent Y567F mutation), as well as of the remaining loxP site, was confirmed by sequencing. Only KitV558Δ;Y567F/+ and KitV558Δ;Y719F/+ animals that genotyped negative for the Cre allele were used for subsequent backcrosses to KitY567F/Y567F (20) and KitY719F/+ mice (24), respectively, which had been backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J background for at least 10 generations previously. To produce KitV558Δ;Y567F/567 mice, KitV558Δ;Y567F/+ mice were intercrossed with KitY567F/Y567F mice, and to produce KitV558Δ;Y719F/719 mice, KitV558Δ;Y719F/+ mice were intercrossed with KitY719F/+ mice, because KitY719F/Y719F mice are sterile (24). A PCR strategy bracketing the 134-bp loxP scar was used for routine genotyping thereafter (WT allele, 291 bp; targeted allele, 425 bp) with the primers mKitEx11F, 5′-CATAGACCCGACGCAACTTC-3′, and mKitIn11R, 5′-GGTTCCCAAATCAACAAGGC-3′. Initial experiments were done with backcross generation N3, and repetitions were done with generation N4–N10+ animals. No change in phenotype was observed in different backcross generations. KitV558Δ/+ and KitV558Δ;T669I/+ mice have been described previously (10, 11). All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Functional Assay.
This assay was performed using the PathHunter eXpress Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Assay Kit (DiscoveRx), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Custom-made U2OS cells expressing the large β-gal subunit fused to the SH2 domain of phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ) (enzyme acceptor) transiently expressing murine cDNA of Kit-WT, Kit-V558∆, or Kit-V558∆;Y719F were C-terminally tagged with a small β-gal subunit (ProLink tag) to assay full-length KIT functional autophosphorylation on tyrosine recruiting PLCγ (Y728), which is immediately adjacent to the PI3K recruitment site affected by the KITY719 mutation. Ligand and/or mutation activation of the KIT receptor causes its autophosphorylation and subsequent binding of PLCγ to KITPY728, resulting in complementation of the two fragments of β-gal and formation of a functional enzyme. β-gal activity was then quantitatively detected using the chemiluminescent substrate in the PathHunter Kit.
Western Blot Analysis.
Tumor lysates were prepared as described previously (13) with the following modifications. Snap-frozen tumor was first homogenized in a PowerGen 1000 homogenizer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then incubated on ice for 30 min. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 4 °C for 30 min and then fractionated by SDS/PAGE. Protein extracts were prepared from tumors of several mice to assess individual variability in the response to drugs. Proteins were visualized by Western blot analysis after incubation with appropriate antibodies. Phospho-KIT (Tyr719), KIT, Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204), p44/42 MAPKinase, phospho-S6 protein (Ser235/236), S6 protein, phospho-AKT (Ser473), AKT, phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, phospho-STAT5 (Tyr694), STAT5, phospho-SRC family (Tyr416), and SRC were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Phospho-KIT (Tyr568 + Tyr569) was obtained from Abcam.
Drug Treatment in Mice.
Mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free animal facility and used in accordance with an institutional approved protocol. Voxtalisib (XL765) and pilaralisib (XL147) were provided by Exelixis. Voxtalisib was suspended at 2 mg/mL in water/10 mM HCl. For the 6-h treatment, voxtalisib was administered once at 30 mg/kg by gavage. For the 7-d treatment, it was administered at 20 mg/kg by gavage twice a day (30 mg/kg was toxic). PD325901 was administered by gavage, once at 5 or 15 mg/kg for the 6-h treatment and once a day at 15 mg/kg for the 7-d treatment. For combination treatment with voxtalisib and PD325901, the dose had to be reduced to 5 mg/kg each and administered only once daily. Pilaralisib was solubilized in water, sonicated and administered at 100 mg/kg by gavage within 60min of formulation. It was administered once for the 4-h treatment, and once a day for the 7-d treatment. For combination treatment, pilaralisib and PD325901 were administered daily at 100 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg, respectively. Alpelisib (37) and binimetinib (38) were suspended at 4 mg/mL in 0.5% Tween 80 and 1% carboxymethyl cellulose in water. Alpelisib was administered at 20 mg/kg (Western blots), 40 mg/kg (Ki-67 and trichrome), or 65 (Ki-67) mg/kg by gavage once daily for 7 d. Binimetinib was administered at 3.5 mg/kg (Western blots) or 10 mg/kg (Ki-67 and trichrome) by gavage twice daily for 7 d. For combination treatment, alpelisib and binimetinib were administered for 7 d at 20 mg/kg (once daily) and 3.5 mg/kg (twice daily), respectively (Western blots) or at 40 mg/kg (once daily) and 10 mg/kg (twice daily), respectively (Ki-67 and trichrome). Imatinib mesylate (Novartis) was suspended in water and injected i.p. twice daily at 45 mg/kg. Sunitinib malate (LC Laboratories) was solubilized freshly in 30% Cremophor EL (Sigma-Aldrich), 30% polyethylene glycol 400, 10% ethanol, and 10% glucose every 4 d and was administered at 40 mg/kg once daily by gavage. The same formulation without sunitinib was used as vehicle control for the treatments shown in Fig. 5.
Histological and Immunohistochemical Analyses.
Microscopic and IHC analyses were performed as described previously (13). Given the differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the drugs used, treated mice were dissected for histological and IHC analyses on the following schedule: for imatinib, sunitinib, PD325901, and respective vehicle-treated animals, 6 h after the last injection; for voxtalisib, 5 h after the last injection; and for pilaralisb, alpelisib, and binimetinib, 4 h after the last injection. Tumors were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and/or fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde rotating at 4 °C overnight. After paraffin embedding, 5-μm sections of the tumors of at least three different animals per treatment group and of at least three different treatments were placed on microscopic slides next to one another to enable cross-comparison within a slide after IHC staining with the antibodies indicated. Antibodies used were Phospho(P)-ribosomal protein S6 (S235/236) (D57.2.2E), P-MAPK (ERK-1/2) (T202/204) (20G11), P-STAT3 (Y705) (D3A7), and cleaved caspase-3 (CC3, Asp175, 9961), all from Cell Signaling Technology; Ki-67 (Vector Laboratories); and KIT (Oncogene Science). Stained slides were scanned with a MIRAX slide scanner (Carl Zeiss) and Ki-67 staining was quantified by counting stained nuclei in nine 250 × 250 μm fields of at least three different tumors per genotype and treatment. Tissues for H&E staining were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin; 5-μm sections were stained with H&E for histological analysis.
Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism version 5.0. Comparisons between two groups was done by unpaired t test analysis assuming unequal variances using GraphPad Prism. Statistical significance was achieved when P < 0.05.
Acknowledgments
We thank Willie Mark and Antoinette Rookard from the Mouse Genetics Core facility for help with gene targeting experiments; Mesru Turkekul, Asfar Barlas, and Ning Fan from the Molecular Cytology core facility at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for help with histological analysis; Peterson Chao and Adriana Guevara for assistance with experiments; and Russell Holmes and John Burrowes for logistical and administrative support. This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grants R01 HL55748, to P.B.; CA102774, to P.B.; P50 CA140146, to P.B. and C.R.A.; R01 CA102613, to R.P.D.; and P30 CA008748) and the Starr Cancer Consortium (P.B. and C.R.A.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1711449114/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Hirota S, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 1998;279:577–580. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lorincz A, et al. Progenitors of interstitial cells of Cajal in the postnatal murine stomach. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1083–1093. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huizinga JD, et al. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature. 1995;373:347–349. doi: 10.1038/373347a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maeda H, et al. Requirement of c-kit for development of intestinal pacemaker system. Development. 1992;116:369–375. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dematteo RP, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1097–1104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60500-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blanke CD, et al. Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:620–625. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antonescu CR, et al. Acquired resistance to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor occurs through secondary gene mutation. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4182–4190. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tamborini E, et al. A new mutation in the KIT ATP pocket causes acquired resistance to imatinib in a gastrointestinal stromal tumor patient. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:294–299. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nishida T, et al. Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumours with germline mutation of the KIT gene. Nat Genet. 1998;19:323–324. doi: 10.1038/1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sommer G, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a mouse model by targeted mutation of the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:6706–6711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1037763100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bosbach B, et al. Imatinib resistance and microcytic erythrocytosis in a KitV558Delta;T669I/+ gatekeeper-mutant mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2276–E2283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115240109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rossi F, et al. Oncogenic Kit signaling and therapeutic intervention in a mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:12843–12848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511076103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rossi F, et al. Imatinib up-regulates compensatory integrin signaling in a mouse model of gastrointestinal stromal tumor and is more effective when combined with dasatinib. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8:1271–1283. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huber M, et al. Targeted disruption of SHIP leads to Steel factor-induced degranulation of mast cells. EMBO J. 1998;17:7311–7319. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lennartsson J, et al. Phosphorylation of Shc by Src family kinases is necessary for stem cell factor receptor/c-kit–mediated activation of the Ras/MAP kinase pathway and c-fos induction. Oncogene. 1999;18:5546–5553. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Timokhina I, Kissel H, Stella G, Besmer P. Kit signaling through PI 3-kinase and Src kinase pathways: An essential role for Rac1 and JNK activation in mast cell proliferation. EMBO J. 1998;17:6250–6262. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.21.6250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chaix A, et al. KIT-D816V oncogenic activity is controlled by the juxtamembrane docking site Y568-Y570. Oncogene. 2014;33:872–881. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mali RS, et al. Role of SHP2 phosphatase in KIT-induced transformation: Identification of SHP2 as a druggable target in diseases involving oncogenic KIT. Blood. 2012;120:2669–2678. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-375873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Serve H, Hsu YC, Besmer P. Tyrosine residue 719 of the c-kit receptor is essential for binding of the P85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase and for c-kit-associated PI 3-kinase activity in COS-1 cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:6026–6030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Agosti V, et al. Critical role for Kit-mediated Src kinase but not PI 3-kinase signaling in pro T and pro B cell development. J Exp Med. 2004;199:867–878. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Agosti V, Karur V, Sathyanarayana P, Besmer P, Wojchowski DM. A KIT juxtamembrane PY567 -directed pathway provides nonredundant signals for erythroid progenitor cell development and stress erythropoiesis. Exp Hematol. 2009;37:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kimura Y, et al. Targeted mutations of the juxtamembrane tyrosines in the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase selectively affect multiple cell lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:6015–6020. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0305363101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blume-Jensen P, et al. Kit/stem cell factor receptor-induced activation of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase is essential for male fertility. Nat Genet. 2000;24:157–162. doi: 10.1038/72814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kissel H, et al. Point mutation in kit receptor tyrosine kinase reveals essential roles for kit signaling in spermatogenesis and oogenesis without affecting other kit responses. EMBO J. 2000;19:1312–1326. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.6.1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.John GB, Shidler MJ, Besmer P, Castrillon DH. Kit signaling via PI3K promotes ovarian follicle maturation but is dispensable for primordial follicle activation. Dev Biol. 2009;331:292–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gibbons SJ, et al. Kit/stem cell factor receptor-induced phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase signalling is not required for normal development and function of interstitial cells of Cajal in mouse gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:643–653. doi: 10.1046/j.1350-1925.2003.00448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Russell ES. Hereditary anemias of the mouse: A review for geneticists. Adv Genet. 1979;20:357–459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Carracedo A, et al. Inhibition of mTORC1 leads to MAPK pathway activation through a PI3K-dependent feedback loop in human cancer. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3065–3074. doi: 10.1172/JCI34739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chaix A, et al. Mechanisms of STAT protein activation by oncogenic KIT mutants in neoplastic mast cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:5956–5966. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ma P, et al. Balanced interactions between Lyn, the p85alpha regulatory subunit of class I(A) phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, and SHIP are essential for mast cell growth and maturation. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:4052–4062. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05750-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ma P, et al. Role of intracellular tyrosines in activating KIT-induced myeloproliferative disease. Leukemia. 2012;26:1499–1506. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kwon JG, et al. Changes in the structure and function of ICC networks in ICC hyperplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:630–639. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Floris G, et al. A potent combination of the novel PI3K inhibitor, GDC-0941, with imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor xenografts: Long-lasting responses after treatment withdrawal. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:620–630. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Van Looy T, et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors combined with imatinib in patient-derived xenograft models of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Rationale and efficacy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6071–6082. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zook P, et al. Combination of imatinib mesylate and AKT inhibitor provides synergistic effects in preclinical study of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:171–180. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Swiatek PJ, Gridley T. Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox20. Genes Dev. 1993;7:2071–2084. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.11.2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fritsch C, et al. Characterization of the novel and specific PI3Kalpha inhibitor NVP-BYL719 and development of the patient stratification strategy for clinical trials. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:1117–1129. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen X, et al. Combined PKC and MEK inhibition in uveal melanoma with GNAQ and GNA11 mutations. Oncogene. 2014;33:4724–4734. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]