Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2017 Sep 18;114(40):10560–10565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711493114

Copper nanoparticle ensembles for selective electroreduction of CO2 to C2–C3 products

Dohyung Kim a,b,c, Christopher S Kley d, Yifan Li b,c,d, Peidong Yang a,b,c,d,1
PMCID: PMC5635920  PMID: 28923930

Significance

Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to carbon-based products, which can be used directly as fuels or indirectly as fuel precursors, is suggested as one of the promising solutions for sustainability. Not only does this process allow using renewables such as solar electricity as energy input, but CO2 emitted from the consumption process can be recycled back into fuels. The success of this technology depends on the value added to the product that forms from CO2, and therefore it is important to facilitate multicarbon product generation. This work presents a copper-based catalyst, formed in situ from an ensemble of nanoparticles, that is able to selectively generate C2–C3 products at low overpotentials with good stability, where their efficient formation has been difficult to achieve.

Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis, electrocatalysis, CO2 reduction, copper nanoparticles, in situ structural transformation

Abstract

Direct conversion of carbon dioxide to multicarbon products remains as a grand challenge in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Various forms of oxidized copper have been demonstrated as electrocatalysts that still require large overpotentials. Here, we show that an ensemble of Cu nanoparticles (NPs) enables selective formation of C2–C3 products at low overpotentials. Densely packed Cu NP ensembles underwent structural transformation during electrolysis into electrocatalytically active cube-like particles intermixed with smaller nanoparticles. Ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol are the major C2–C3 products with onset potential at −0.53 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) and C2–C3 faradaic efficiency (FE) reaching 50% at only −0.75 V. Thus, the catalyst exhibits selective generation of C2–C3 hydrocarbons and oxygenates at considerably lowered overpotentials in neutral pH aqueous media. In addition, this approach suggests new opportunities in realizing multicarbon product formation from CO2, where the majority of efforts has been to use oxidized copper-based materials. Robust catalytic performance is demonstrated by 10 h of stable operation with C2–C3 current density 10 mA/cm2 (at −0.75 V), rendering it attractive for solar-to-fuel applications. Tafel analysis suggests reductive CO coupling as a rate determining step for C2 products, while n-propanol (C3) production seems to have a discrete pathway.


With rising concerns about the anthropogenic impacts of current trends in energy use, as well as the prospect of continuing these trends to meet future needs (1), we are at a stage where revolutionary change to our energy paradigm is a must. Various methods for effectively using solar energy are being developed to power and support the global population (24). Among them, artificial photosynthesis is considered vital to meeting our goal toward long-term global sustainability (5). The successful introduction of artificial photosynthesis technology will highly depend on the development of every functional component essential to the efficient operation of the overall system.

As energy from sunlight eventually ends up in chemical bonds by the photocatalytic or electrocatalytic component, development of an effective catalytic material to facilitate the conversion process becomes important. Over the past several decades, the focus has been on using water as the starting substrate and converting it to hydrogen gas (6). More recently, carbon dioxide has been considered as a promising substrate, and many efforts have been underway to find efficient electrocatalysts that can selectively operate for reducing CO2 in aqueous solutions against the competing hydrogen evolution (716). However, major progress has been limited to two-electron reduced products of CO and formate. Still, the formation of multicarbon products involving multiple proton and electron transfers remains as one of the biggest scientific challenges to be addressed.

Starting from the idea that element copper is a key component to forming multicarbon products (17, 18), there have been various studies so far where formation of products such as C2H4, C2H6, and C2H5OH has been observed often with the requirement of large overpotentials (potential applied ≤−1 V vs. RHE) (1935). These methods mostly rely on reducing certain forms of oxidized copper (1925, 2730, 3234) (either oxides or halides) and even this approach has been extended to reduce carbon monoxide instead (36), a common intermediate for CO2 reduction, to circumvent difficulties associated with C–C coupling starting from CO2. Furthermore, to instead create a favorable environment for multicarbon product formation, there have been attempts to use gas-diffusion electrodes with alkaline electrolytes (37). It would certainly be desirable to discover an electrocatalyst that can directly reduce CO2 to multicarbon products with high selectivity and energy efficiency (i.e., minimal energy loss from low overpotentials).

Here, we show that an ensemble of densely packed copper nanoparticles (NPs) could enable selective conversion of CO2 to multicarbon products, while significantly suppressing C1 formation. Catalytically active cube-like structures, capable of forming ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol, are formed during electrolysis by the structural transformation of the Cu NP ensemble. These structures can selectively generate C2 and C3 products together at low overpotentials in neutral pH aqueous media, illustrating the importance of in situ structural evolution in CO2 electrocatalysis. We also find that the catalyst support plays an important role for high multicarbon selectivity. This work suggests an alternative route to development of catalysts for multicarbon products and understanding of their formation, where the field has been heavily reliant on using oxidized copper as starting materials.

Results and Discussion

Monodisperse Cu NPs (size 6.7 nm) prepared (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) were directly deposited onto carbon paper support (1 cm2geo) to form densely packed NP ensembles. Cu NP loading was systematically increased (SI Appendix, Table S1) starting from the lowest loading of ∼2 μg of Cu (×1). Number density of NPs was determined based on the estimated surface area of the carbon paper support (24, 26) (SI Appendix, Fig. S2), which was at ∼5.9 cm2real/cm2geo (roughness factor ∼5.9). Most of the NPs are isolated at the lowest loading condition, and increased loadings resulted in densely packed arrangements of Cu NPs (Fig. 1A). In the case of ×22.5 loading, the surface was mostly covered with closely packed Cu NPs (SI Appendix, Fig. S3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Varied density of Cu NP ensembles and their electrocatalytic activity. (A) SEM images of Cu NPs loaded on carbon-paper support at ×1 loading, ×5 loading, and ×22.5 loading. (B) FEs (%) for C1, C2, and C3 products. (C) Relative ratio of the FEs. (D) Ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol FE with the dotted line showing the overall C2–C3 FE. Activity measured at −0.81 V vs. RHE, using 0.1 M KHCO3 saturated under 1 atm CO2. Error bars shown in BD are 1 SD from three independent measurements.

Cu NP ensembles with varied loading densities were tested for their electrocatalytic CO2 reduction activity, under identical conditions of 0.1 M KHCO3 at 1 atm CO2. From product analysis (SI Appendix, Fig. S4), we found that increased loadings resulted in a drastic rise of the C2–C3 faradaic efficiency (FE) (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Fig. S5 and Table S2). This trend is consistent with the observed loss of C1 products, indicating that carbon-based intermediates could be effectively coupled to yield multicarbon products. When plotting the relative ratio of the C2–C3 FE to C1 FE (Fig. 1C), charge consumed to reduce CO2 was mainly from the reaction pathways to C2–C3 products at increased loading conditions, reaching up to 76% out of the total CO2 reduction products. Similar trends can be seen with CO2 reduction dominating over the competing H2 evolution (Fig. 1C). Among various C2–C3 products, ethylene (C2H4), ethanol (EtOH), and n-propanol (n-PrOH) were the majority, constituting 94% out of the total C2–C3 products generated (Fig. 1D).

When probing the product distribution over time for the ×22.5 loading condition, an abrupt change occurred during the initial period (Fig. 2B). Hydrogen was the dominant product when gas products were measured 3 min after the start of electrolysis. Selectivity for C2H4 increased afterward. A similar trend was found for the liquid products as well (SI Appendix, Fig. S6), where liquids analyzed for the first 7 min had less multicarbon products relative to formate. Visual inspection of the electrode (SI Appendix, Fig. S7) also supported the fact that product distribution was shifting during its initial electrochemical testing, as more gas bubbles were observed at the beginning of electrolysis, probably due to the majority of charge being consumed for two-electron transfer products, such as hydrogen.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Structural transformation of Cu NP ensembles. (A) Schematic illustrating the transformation process of Cu NP ensembles to an active catalyst for C2–C3 product formation. (B) Total current density (based on geometric area) versus time plot for ×22.5 loading condition at −0.81 V vs. RHE. FE of gas products are shown at the time point of measurement. FE of CH4 and C2H6 are omitted because of their low values. (C) SEM image of ×22.5 loaded carbon-paper support electrode after 7 min of electrolysis at −0.81 V vs. RHE. (D) Investigation of the parameters affecting structural transformation of Cu NP ensembles and their catalytic activity. Three different conditions have been tested: (i) separation of the NPs from their initial densely packed assembly, (ii) use of Cu nanocubes as starting materials, and (iii) change of support to a low surface area carbon plate. FE of C1, C2, and C3 products obtained from trans-CuEn (left column, shaded, at −0.81 V vs. RHE) are compared with the activity measured for three different conditions [at (i) −0.84 V, (ii) −0.86 V, and (iii) −0.81 V vs. RHE, respectively]. Electrochemical tests were conducted using 0.1 M KHCO3 solution at 1 atm CO2.

This observation indicated that the NP ensemble may go through a structural transformation process during initial electrolysis. Instead of the starting densely packed Cu NPs (×22.5 loading, Fig. 1A), cube-like particles (10 ∼ 40 nm) mixed together with smaller NPs were observed on the carbon support after electrolysis (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Carbon-paper supports with lower loading were also checked after electrolysis and a trend could be observed: the more densely packed the Cu NPs, the more likely the formation of cube-like particles (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). When Cu NPs were sparsely covering the support, random aggregates of NPs together with the pristine NPs could be found after electrolysis. Surface-area analysis of Cu NP ensembles after electrolysis also showed that the densely packed NPs transformed to larger particles (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). As expected, loss of surface ligands during electrolysis and structural transformation was confirmed by elemental analysis (SI Appendix, Figs. S11 and S12). Structural transformation of the NP ensemble (Fig. 2A) occurred during the initial stage of electrolysis. This was confirmed from observation of the electrode 7 min after the start of electrolysis (Fig. 2C), which coincided with the shift in catalytic activity (Fig. 2B). Negligible catalytic activity of the underlying carbon paper (SI Appendix, Fig. S13) further supports that the structure derived from Cu NP ensembles is responsible for enhanced C2–C3 formation. This catalytically active structure formed starting from densely packed Cu NP ensembles (×22.5 loading on carbon-paper support in 0.1 M KHCO3), hereafter referred to as trans-CuEn, was further investigated.

As the initial loading density of Cu NP ensembles (and their densely “packed-ness”) tends to govern their structural transformation during electrolysis and resulting electrochemical activity, we tried to intentionally separate the Cu NPs in the precursor state to trans-CuEn. We expected the transformation process to cube-like structures to be disrupted, leading to diminished C2–C3 selectivity. Cu NPs (×22.5 loading) were mixed with carbon black before depositing on carbon-paper support (SI Appendix, Fig. S14), which led to NPs being spatially separated from each other. Under this condition, substantial loss of C2–C3 product selectivity (FE from 49 to 17%) was observed (Fig. 2D), while CO and HCOO became major products. When particles were examined after electrolysis, the structure more resembled what would be observed for low-density conditions (SI Appendix, Figs. S9 and S14). Cu NPs have been observed to electrically fuse into irregularly shaped large crystals under strong bias conditions (<−1.25 V vs. RHE), reaching a similar state irrespective of the initial conditions (38). Here, we find that structural transformation can be caused not only under low bias conditions, but controlled by the initial arrangement of NPs, and consequently catalytic behavior for multicarbon products can be significantly improved.

As trans-CuEn displays cubic-shaped particles, copper nanocubes loaded onto carbon-paper support were tested under identical conditions for comparison. We used Cu nanocubes that have been previously studied for CO2 reduction (26) (SI Appendix, Fig. S15). Specifically, cubes with edge length 25 nm were used (with copper loading mass identical to trans-CuEn) to approximately match the cubic-shaped particles that vary in size (10 ∼ 40 nm) for trans-CuEn. In contrast to trans-CuEn, observed structural changes were minimal where the cubes seem to have sintered or roughened (SI Appendix, Fig. S16). Furthermore, only small amounts of multicarbon products were detected (Fig. 2D). The result is consistent with the earlier report of Cu nanocubes, which claims multicarbon product formation at high overpotentials (<−1 V vs. RHE) (26). Therefore, we find that simple reproduction of the key morphological feature present in trans-CuEn is insufficient to reach high multicarbon selectivity.

This leads to the possibility of cube-like particles derived in situ during electrolysis featuring unique active sites for C2–C3 formation. Recently, scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of copper for carbon monoxide reduction has shown not only the reconstruction of a polycrystalline surface to a (100) surface, but also the additional structural transformation unique to the (100) reconstructed copper, leading to stepped surfaces which selectively generate ethanol (39, 40). While this observation may have been for reducing CO, together with the findings here, it brings into attention the importance of in situ structural transformation for multicarbon product formation in copper-based catalysts. In addition, we would like to point out that while the vast majority of research has been to use oxide-derived structures, with even some reports claiming the importance of remaining oxidized copper (29, 41), the catalytically active structure derived here is from pristine Cu NPs (with a thin layer of surface oxide naturally present). Furthermore, we find that the structural transformation observed is unique to the original Cu NPs (SI Appendix, Fig. S17). Therefore, it would be important to understand how this structural transformation proceeds and what type of active site motifs are present under working conditions. This is especially the case for copper, which may oxidize after electrolysis, possibly leading to the loss of surface atomic information (SI Appendix, Fig. S12). However, we also cannot rule out the possibility that high multicarbon selectivity stems from having a mixture of particles (42), which are the cube-like ones together with smaller particles. With all of these taken into consideration, further investigation into the structural origin of high multicarbon selectivity from Cu NP ensembles is needed.

Furthermore, we investigated the role of the catalyst support by depositing Cu NPs onto a highly polished graphite plate (1 cm2real, roughness factor ∼1), while keeping the NP density (/cm2real) identical to that of trans-CuEn. Structural transformation occurred in a similar way resulting in cubic-shaped particles (SI Appendix, Fig. S18). However, H2 and C1 products were the major products (Fig. 2D and SI Appendix, Fig. S18). We speculate that this difference is due to local pH effects discussed in earlier reports (32, 4346), as the loss in the real surface area of the underlying support led to a sharp decrease of the geometric current density (lowered to ≈1/5 of the original). The increased local pH by large current density of trans-CuEn (on carbon-paper support) could play a role in determining its catalytic behavior. Therefore, it seems that it is important to not only start from a high density of closely packed Cu NPs to facilitate the structural transformation, but also have the underlying support provide sufficient surface area. This shows why high C2–C3 selectivity was not observed from the previous report of Cu NP monolayers (16).

Catalytic activity of trans-CuEn was further probed at various potentials (Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Fig. S19) in 0.1 M KHCO3. The onset of C2–C3 formation was observed at only −0.57 V vs. RHE, with products mainly comprising C2H4, EtOH, and n-PrOH. Compared with that of the pristine copper foil (18), overpotentials were lowered by 180 mV for C2H4 and 390 mV for EtOH and n-PrOH, respectively (SI Appendix, Table S3). Beyond this potential, a substantial rise in C2–C3 FE was observed (SI Appendix, Table S4), with the highest selectivity toward C2–C3 products (55%) achieved at −0.86 V vs. RHE. The high selectivity for C2–C3 products, including oxygenates, is quite significant, compared with previously reported catalysts for C2–C3 product formation around similar overpotentials applied in neutral pH aqueous media (SI Appendix, Table S5). So far, catalysts for multicarbon products have been Cu-based (mostly derived from oxides or halides) and require bias applied close to and beyond −1 V vs. RHE (SI Appendix, Table S6), where even only some of them reach product distributions dominated by C2–C3 products (C2–C3 > C1 + H2). Furthermore, with major efforts in the field toward using oxidized Cu as a starting template, the discovery of this catalyst presents an approach to achieving high C2–C3 selectivity for electrochemical CO2 reduction. In contrast, FE for two-electron reduced products (CO and formate) could be lowered to ∼1%, implying that almost all of the CO2 interacting with the catalyst could undergo C–C coupling to yield more complex products (Fig. 3B). In assessing catalytic performance for multicarbon product formation, earlier reports have been using C2H4/CH4 FE ratio as a figure of merit and trans-CuEn exhibits significantly high values at low overpotentials (∼252 at −0.78 V vs. RHE) that are comparable or better than previous catalysts reported for selective formation of C2H4 (SI Appendix, Fig. S20 and Table S7). More negative bias applied leads to increase in CH4 formation and C1 FE.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Electrochemical CO2 reduction activity of trans-CuEn. (A) FE of C1, C2, and C3 products at various potentials for trans-CuEn. (B) FE of major products at various potentials for trans-CuEn. Electrochemical tests were conducted using 0.1 M KHCO3 solution at 1 atm CO2. Error bars shown are 1 SD from three independent measurements.

It has been suggested that larger cations promote higher concentrations of CO2 near the catalyst surface, leading to increased activity (17, 47). For further optimization, Cu NP ensembles were tested in 0.1 M CsHCO3 aqueous electrolyte saturated with 1 atm CO2 and a similar trend was observed where increased loading densities resulted in higher C2–C3 selectivity (SI Appendix, Fig. S21). Transformation of Cu NP ensembles (at optimized condition of ×32.5 loading in 0.1 M CsHCO3) consistently resulted in cube-shaped particles mixed together with smaller NPs (SI Appendix, Fig. S22), hereafter referred to as trans-CuEn 2. Activity of trans-CuEn 2 was measured at various potentials (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S23) and high C2–C3 selectivity was observed at more positive potentials with the onset of C2–C3 formation at only −0.53 V vs. RHE (SI Appendix, Table S3), which is 40 mV less of applied overpotential compared with that observed in 0.1 M KHCO3. Highest C2–C3 selectivity (∼50%) was observed at −0.75 V vs. RHE, shifting the potential 110 mV more positive relative to the point of maximum C2–C3 FE in 0.1 M KHCO3. Therefore, with this catalytic structure, selective electrocatalytic conversion CO2 to C2–C3 hydrocarbons and oxygenates could be achieved at significantly reduced overpotentials, compared with what have been demonstrated up to now (SI Appendix, Tables S5 and S6). Similarly, the main products were C2H4, EtOH, and n-PrOH (Fig. 4B and SI Appendix, Table S8) constituting up to 95% of total C2–C3 products (SI Appendix, Fig. S24). In addition, not only were FEs of CO and formate decreased to very low levels (1∼2%), but CH4 formation could also be suppressed (<1%) across the entire potential region, resulting in a significantly high C2H4/CH4 ratio (∼2,133 at −0.73 V vs. RHE) at low overpotentials (SI Appendix, Fig. S24 and Table S7). Owing to its high C2–C3 selectivity in 0.1 M CsHCO3, the proportion of C2–C3 products among the total CO2 reduced products reached up to 90% (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Electrocatalytic behavior of trans-CuEn 2 (×32.5 loading in 0.1 M CsHCO3). (A) FE of C1, C2, and C3 products at various potentials. (B) FE of major products at various potentials. (C) Relative ratio of the FE. (D) Logarithmic specific current density (corrected by the real surface area of the catalyst) plots for C2H4, EtOH, and n-PrOH. Electrochemical tests were conducted in 0.1 M CsHCO3 solution at 1 atm CO2. Error bars shown are 1 SD from three independent measurements. (E) Long-term electrolysis at −0.75 V vs. RHE with gas products measured every hour. Column graph on the right shows FE of EtOH and n-PrOH measured after electrolysis and C1, C2, and C3 product FEs for the overall run.

With the real surface area of trans-CuEn 2 measured (SI Appendix, Fig. S25), specific current density plots and Tafel slopes of the three major products could be obtained (Fig. 4D). Both C2H4 and EtOH exhibit similar slopes (∼120 mV/dec), indicative of a rate-determining step with a common intermediate. Furthermore, C2H4 and EtOH start forming in the potential region where CO evolution is dominant and increase while CO diminishes (Figs. 3B and 4B), suggesting that formation of these C2 products is essentially limited by the coupling of major C1 intermediates. It has been also shown that higher coverages of *CO can be expected in the region where CO formation is majorly observed (48). Therefore, with a slope close to 120 mV/dec suggesting a single electron transfer step, we expect the rate-determining step to be a reductive coupling (i.e., dimerization) step of adsorbed CO intermediates, predicted from theory and carbon monoxide reduction experiments on copper (43, 4951):

*CO+*CO+e*C2O2.

On the other hand, n-PrOH exhibits a different slope, suggesting a distinct rate-determining step from that of C2 products. Estimated value is rather close to that observed for CH4 on copper foil (86 mV/dec) (38). In addition, it has been reported that n-PrOH formation only occurs when reactants include both CO (carbon monoxide) and C2H4, while CO reduction solely leads to EtOH (28). If C3 products followed the same pathway as C2 products, n-PrOH should have been observed upon CO reduction. Instead, it may be that n-PrOH formation requires coupling between CO and hydrogenated carbon [e.g., carbene (*CH2)], which is a major intermediate in the pathway to CH4 (50). CH4 formation activity of trans-CuEn and -CuEn 2 supports this idea as well (Figs. 3B and 4B and SI Appendix, Tables S4 and S8). In contrast to C2H4 and EtOH, n-PrOH reaches peak selectivity at a more positive potential and the potential in which n-PrOH FE drops coincides well with the point where CH4 FE starts to rise. However, it is still unclear how formation of C3 products occur and an in-depth study of the mechanistic pathways to these products is needed.

Long-term stability was demonstrated by 10 h electrolysis of trans-CuEn 2 at −0.75 V vs. RHE (Fig. 4E). Average C2–C3 FE reached ∼50% for the overall run and structural features of trans-CuEn 2 were maintained as well (SI Appendix, Fig. S26). Furthermore, stable C2–C3 product current density of 10 mA/cm2geo was achieved, which is potentially attractive for solar-to-fuel applications. As long-term electrolysis accumulates significant amounts of liquid products, propionaldehyde, likely to be the precursor to n-PrOH, was detected (SI Appendix, Fig. S27).

Stable and selective C2–C3 product generation achieved by the structurally transformed Cu NP ensembles presents a promising future direction to renewables-powered artificial carbon cycle. Projected solar-to-fuel efficiencies of multicarbon products (SI Appendix, Fig. S28), assuming combination of commercial Si photovoltaic devices and electrolysis configurations recently demonstrated for effective syngas formation (52, 53), are comparable or better than natural photosynthesis (e.g., 2.8% for C2H4). Significant mass activities are achieved as well (SI Appendix, Fig. S29), desirable in terms of cost-effectiveness, due to extremely low mass (gCu) used compared with other methods that rely on bulk Cu oxidation.

Conclusions

We have shown how an ensemble of Cu NPs can enable selective electrocatalytic conversion of CO2 to C2–C3 hydrocarbons and oxygenates at significantly reduced overpotentials. Structural evolution of densely arranged Cu NPs resulted in C2–C3 active nanostructures and experimental investigation of the parameters affecting structural transformation and their catalytic behavior was performed. With the discovery of this active catalytic structure formed in situ, efforts in deepening the understanding of how NPs and atoms within evolve under electrically biased and chemically relevant conditions seem necessary, which will shed light on the key structural features for CO2 conversion to multicarbon products. Furthermore, we anticipate that the unique approach of using NPs as precursors to an active nanostructured material will lead to a wide expansion of the materials library for various catalytic applications.

Methods

Copper NPs in this work are synthesized by reducing copper precursors at high temperatures with tetradecylphosphonic acid used as surface ligands. Densely packed arrangement of copper NPs on carbon support is achieved by directly loading these particles in solution to a carbon-paper electrode. Copper NPs deposited electrodes are tested for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide in neutral pH aqueous environments (0.1 M KHCO3 or CsHCO3 at 1 atm CO2), with products measured by gas chromatography and NMR. Original copper NPs and the structures formed during electrolysis are characterized by various methods, including electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. Further details of the experimental methods are provided in SI Appendix.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, & Biosciences Division, of the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231, FWP CH030201 (Catalysis Research Program). Transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were conducted using facilities at the National Center for Electron Microscopy and Imaging and Nanofabrication facilities at the Molecular Foundry. Work at the Molecular Foundry was supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. This work made use of the facilities at the NMR Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy was supported by the Microanalytical Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley. D.K. acknowledges the support of Samsung Scholarship. C.S.K. acknowledges support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement: Provisional patent application filed based on the technology described in this work.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1711493114/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.EIA . International Energy Outlook 2016. US Energy Information Administration; Washington, DC: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lewis NS. Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Science. 2016;351:aad1920. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu C, Colón BC, Ziesack M, Silver PA, Nocera DG. Water splitting-biosynthetic system with CO2 reduction efficiencies exceeding photosynthesis. Science. 2016;352:1210–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luo J, et al. Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and Earth-abundant catalysts. Science. 2014;345:1593–1596. doi: 10.1126/science.1258307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim D, Sakimoto KK, Hong D, Yang P. Artificial photosynthesis for sustainable fuel and chemical production. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:3259–3266. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vesborg PCK, Seger B, Chorkendorff I. Recent development in hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts and their practical implementation. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:951–957. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luc W, et al. Ag-Sn bimetallic catalyst with a core-shell structure for CO2 reduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:1885–1893. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b10435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Z, Yang G, Zhang Z, Jin M, Yin Y. Selectivity on etching: Creation of high-energy facets on copper nanocrystals for CO2 electrochemical reduction. ACS Nano. 2016;10:4559–4564. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weng Z, et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to hydrocarbons on a heterogeneous molecular Cu catalyst in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:8076–8079. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hall AS, Yoon Y, Wuttig A, Surendranath Y. Mesostructure-induced selectivity in CO2 reduction catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:14834–14837. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asadi M, et al. Nanostructured transition metal dichalcogenide electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction in ionic liquid. Science. 2016;353:467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhu W, et al. Active and selective conversion of CO2 to CO on ultrathin Au nanowires. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:16132–16135. doi: 10.1021/ja5095099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen Y, Li CW, Kanan MW. Aqueous CO2 reduction at very low overpotential on oxide-derived Au nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:19969–19972. doi: 10.1021/ja309317u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gao S, et al. Partially oxidized atomic cobalt layers for carbon dioxide electroreduction to liquid fuel. Nature. 2016;529:68–71. doi: 10.1038/nature16455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu M, et al. Enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction via field-induced reagent concentration. Nature. 2016;537:382–386. doi: 10.1038/nature19060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim D, Resasco J, Yu Y, Asiri AM, Yang P. Synergistic geometric and electronic effects for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using gold-copper bimetallic nanoparticles. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4948. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hori Y. Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry. Springer; New York: 2008. Electrochemical CO2 reduction on metal electrodes; pp. 89–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuhl KP, Cave ER, Abram DN, Jaramillo TF. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:7050. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kas R, et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction on Cu2O-derived copper nanoparticles: Controlling the catalytic selectivity of hydrocarbons. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:12194–12201. doi: 10.1039/c4cp01520g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen CS, Wan JH, Yeo BS. Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethane using nanostructured Cu2O-derived copper catalyst and palladium(II) chloride. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:26875–26882. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim D, et al. Insights into an autonomously formed oxygen-evacuated Cu2O electrode for the selective production of C2H4 from CO2. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;17:824–830. doi: 10.1039/c4cp03172e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen CS, et al. Stable and selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene on copper mesocrystals. Catal Sci Technol. 2015;5:161–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee S, Kim D, Lee J. Electrocatalytic production of C3-C4 compounds by conversion of CO2 on a chloride-induced bi-phasic Cu2O-Cu catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:14701–14705. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dutta A, Rahaman M, Luedi NC, Mohos M, Broekmann P. Morphology matters: Tuning the product distribution of CO2 electroreduction on oxide-derived Cu foam catalysts. ACS Catal. 2016;6:3804–3814. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kwon Y, Lum Y, Clark EL, Ager JW, Bell AT. CO2 electroreduction with enhanced ethylene and ethanol selectivity by nanostructuring polycrystalline copper. ChemElectroChem. 2016;3:1012–1019. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Loiudice A, et al. Tailoring copper nanocrystals towards C2 products in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55:5789–5792. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ren D, et al. Selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene and ethanol on copper(I) oxide catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015;5:2814–2821. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ren D, Wong NT, Handoko AD, Huang Y, Yeo BS. Mechanistic insights into the enhanced activity and stability of agglomerated Cu nanocrystals for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to n-propanol. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7:20–24. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mistry H, et al. Highly selective plasma-activated copper catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12123. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Handoko AD, et al. Mechanistic insights into the selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene on Cu2O-derived copper catalysts. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:20058–20067. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Song Y, et al. High-selectivity electrochemical conversion of CO2 to ethanol using a copper nanoparticle/N-doped graphene electrode. ChemistrySelect. 2016;1:6055–6061. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Roberts FS, Kuhl KP, Nilsson A. High selectivity for ethylene from carbon dioxide reduction over copper nanocube electrocatalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:5179–5182. doi: 10.1002/anie.201412214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ren D, Ang BS-H, Yeo BS. Tuning the selectivity of carbon dioxide electroreduction toward ethanol on oxide-derived CuxZn catalysts. ACS Catal. 2016;6:8239–8247. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gao D, et al. Plasma-activated copper nanocube catalysts for efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction to hydrocarbons and alcohols. ACS Nano. 2017;11:4825–4831. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hori Y, Takahashi I, Koga O, Hoshi N. Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at various series of copper single crystal electrodes. J Mol Catal Chem. 2003;199:39–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li CW, Ciston J, Kanan MW. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature. 2014;508:504–507. doi: 10.1038/nature13249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hoang TTH, Ma S, Gold JI, Kenis PJA, Gewirth AA. Nanoporous copper films by additive-controlled electrodeposition: CO2 reduction catalysis. ACS Catal. 2017;7:3313–3321. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Manthiram K, Beberwyck BJ, Alivisatos AP. Enhanced electrochemical methanation of carbon dioxide with a dispersible nanoscale copper catalyst. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:13319–13325. doi: 10.1021/ja5065284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim Y-G, Javier A, Baricuatro JH, Soriaga MP. Regulating the product distribution of CO reduction by the atomic-level structural modification of the Cu electrode surface. Electrocatalysis. 2016;7:391–399. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim Y-G, et al. Surface reconstruction of pure-Cu single-crystal electrodes under CO-reduction potentials in alkaline solutions: A study by seriatim ECSTM-DEMS. J Electroanal Chem. 2016;780:290–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Eilert A, et al. Subsurface oxygen in oxide-derived copper electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide reduction. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:285–290. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mistry H, et al. Tuning catalytic selectivity at the mesoscale via interparticle interactions. ACS Catal. 2016;6:1075–1080. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Varela AS, Kroschel M, Reier T, Strasser P. Controlling the selectivity of CO2 electroreduction on copper: The effect of the electrolyte concentration and the importance of the local pH. Catal Today. 2016;260:8–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kas R, Kortlever R, Yılmaz H, Koper MTM, Mul G. Manipulating the hydrocarbon selectivity of copper nanoparticles in CO2 electroreduction by process conditions. ChemElectroChem. 2015;2:354–358. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ma S, et al. One-step electrosynthesis of ethylene and ethanol from CO2 in an alkaline electrolyzer. J Power Sources. 2016;301:219–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu J, et al. A metal-free electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction to multi-carbon hydrocarbons and oxygenates. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13869. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Singh MR, Kwon Y, Lum Y, Ager JW, 3rd, Bell AT. Hydrolysis of electrolyte cations enhances the electrochemical reduction of CO2 over Ag and Cu. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:13006–13012. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b07612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huang Y, Handoko AD, Hirunsit P, Yeo BS. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 using copper single-crystal surfaces: Effects of CO* coverage on the selective formation of ethylene. ACS Catal. 2017;7:1749–1756. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Calle-Vallejo F, Koper MTM. Theoretical considerations on the electroreduction of CO to C2 species on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:7282–7285. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kortlever R, Shen J, Schouten KJP, Calle-Vallejo F, Koper MTM. Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:4073–4082. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pérez-Gallent E, Figueiredo MC, Calle-Vallejo F, Koper MTM. Spectroscopic observation of a hydrogenated CO dimer intermediate during CO reduction on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:3621–3624. doi: 10.1002/anie.201700580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vermaas DA, Smith WA. Synergistic electrochemical CO2 reduction and water oxidation with a bipolar membrane. ACS Energy Lett. 2016;1:1143–1148. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li YC, et al. Electrolysis of CO2 to syngas in bipolar membrane-based electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2016;1:1149–1153. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES