Skip to main content
Neuroscience Bulletin logoLink to Neuroscience Bulletin
. 2017 Mar 24;33(5):510–514. doi: 10.1007/s12264-017-0122-5

Genetic Analysis of FBXO2, FBXO6, FBXO12, and FBXO41 Variants in Han Chinese Patients with Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease

Lamei Yuan 1,2, Zhi Song 2, Xiong Deng 1, Zhijian Yang 1, Yan Yang 2, Yi Guo 3, Hongwei Lu 1,, Hao Deng 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5636729  PMID: 28341977

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and has an elusive etiology. It is likely multifactorial, and genetic defects contribute to its pathogenesis. At least 25 genetic loci and 20 monogenic genes have been identified in monogenic PD. Recessive F-box protein 7 gene (FBXO7) mutations reportedly cause hereditary parkinsonism. To explore the roles of four paralogs (FBXO2, FBXO6, FBXO12, and FBXO41) in PD development, their variants (rs9614, rs28924120, rs6442117, and rs61733550, respectively) were analyzed in 502 Han Chinese patients with PD and 556 age, gender, and ethnicity-matched normal participants in mainland China. Statistically significant differences in genotypic and allelic frequencies were detected only in the FBXO2 variant rs9614 (P = 0.001 and 0.023, respectively; odds ratio 0.819, 95% confidence interval 0.690–0.973) between patients and controls. These results suggest that the FBXO2 variant rs9614 C allele may decrease the PD risk in mainland Han Chinese and may be a biomarker for PD.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, FBXO2, FBXO6, FBXO12, FBXO41, Variant

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD, OMIM 168600) is a common, progressive, multifactorial, neurodegenerative disease caused by genetic and environmental risk factors [13]. It is age-related, affecting ~1% of the population over 60 years of age, rising to 4% in people over 85 [4, 5]. Motor parkinsonism, defined as bradykinesia plus rigidity or rest tremor, is the cardinal clinical feature [6]. Other motor and non-motor symptoms are also frequently observed in PD [7]. Pathologically, PD cases have dopaminergic neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta. Lewy bodies, which are substantial intracytoplasmic inclusions with ubiquitylated alpha-synuclein, form in surviving neurons [7, 8]. Degeneration and death of dopaminergic neurons in PD are postulated to result from pivotal cellular system impairments, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, disrupted proteolysis referring to the ubiquitin-proteasome system or lysosomal autophagy, neuroinflammation, and/or excitotoxicity [911]. Although the pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear, at least 25 loci and 20 disease-linked genes have been identified to be responsible for monogenic PD [7, 1214]. It has been reported that mutations in a critical domain of a gene such as leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) can cause monogenic PD, whereas variants in a non-crucial region may either increase the risk or play a protective role [1517]. Known heritable components are responsible for 5%–10% of PD patients. Most cases are sporadic forms resulting from a combination of multiple factors [13, 18]. It has been proposed that variants, particularly nucleotide alterations causing amino-acid changes in disease-causing genes or their biologically relevant paralogous genes, play a role in the risk of sporadic PD [12, 1921]. It has been reported that homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the F-box protein 7 gene (FBXO7, OMIM 605648) cause hereditary parkinsonism including parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome and typical PD (PARK15, OMIM 260300). This aroused our interest in evaluating the roles of the F-box gene family [2225]. In this study, four variants (rs9614, rs28924120, rs6442117, and rs61733550) in the paralogs of FBXO7 (FBXO2, FBXO6, FBXO12, and FBXO41), which putatively alter amino-acids and affect protein functions, were studied in Han Chinese PD patients.

Materials and Methods

Participants

We recruited 502 patients with sporadic PD (65.7 ± 10.2 years; onset age, 62.3 ± 7.6 years, 63 cases with onset age ≤50 years; disease duration, 1–26 years; male/female ratio, 302/200) and 556 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched healthy individuals (65.9 ± 10.1 years, male/female ratio, 335/221) from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. All patients resided in south China and were not related. All were examined by experienced neurologists, and the diagnosis of PD was established according to clinical criteria [6, 26]. Written informed consent was given by all participants prior to enrollment. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.

Some patients were negative for causative mutations in PD-associated genes. The following occurred in the following percentages of patients: no vacuolar protein sorting 35 gene (VPS35) mutations in 24.1% (121/502), no F-box protein 48 gene (FBXO48) mutations in 65.7% (330/502), or no mutations in the S100 calcium binding protein B gene (S100B), the alpha-synuclein gene (SNCA), or the RAB39B gene (RAB39B, member of RAS oncogene family) in 74.9% (376/502) [27]. Of those tested, 59.2% (297/502) were negative for point mutations (p.A502V and p.R1205H) in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1 gene (EIF4G1), and 97.6% (490/502) had no rs10788972 or rs12046178 variants in the transcription elongation factor A N-terminal and central domain containing 2 gene (TCEANC2) [21, 28].

Variant Genotyping

The National Center for Biotechnology Information database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was used to search for F-box genes, including the FBXO7 gene. Four variants in the paralogs of the FBXO7 gene with a frequency >5%, rs9614 (c.353A>C, p.K118T), rs28924120 (c.840G>C, p.E280D), rs6442117 (c.496T>C, p.W166R), and rs61733550 (c.1568G>A, p.R523H), were obtained from the public database of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/). They were described as putatively damaging by the bioinformatics tools Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (http://sift.jcvi.org/), Polymorphism Phenotyping version 2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), or MutationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/). No FBXO7 gene variants matched the criteria. The four variants were genotyped using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry following protocols in the iPLEXTM Gold Application Guide (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA) to reveal any potential involvement in PD pathogenesis [20, 29]. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using standard protocols [30]. Primers amplifying short segments for mass spectrometry were designed using Sequenom Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA) and are shown in Table 1. Multiplex and single-base extension reactions generated allele-specific short products for the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry assay. MassARRAY Typer 4.0 software (Sequenom) obtained the genotype of samples from spectral peaks [31]. Mass spectrometric genotyping concordance was tested by performing Sanger sequencing in 8% of randomized samples with the Applied Biosystems 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA) [20, 30]. Primer pairs for locus-specific amplification and sequencing were designed using online Primer3 (http://primer3.ut.ee/, Table 1), and the specificity was checked using Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast).

Table 1.

Primer sequences for rs9614, rs28924120, rs6442117, and rs61733550.

rs9614 rs28924120 rs6442117 rs61733550
Forward primer sequence for amplicon 1a (5′→3′) acgttggatgACTGGCAGCAGTTCTACTTC acgttggatgTCTGGACAACAGCTCGGTAG acgttggatgAGATGCATCTCGCCATCACT acgttggatgTGATGACCTCATTGGAGCGT
Reverse primer sequence for amplicon 1a (5′→3′) acgttggatgTTTCGGCCCATTTCGCAGCA acgttggatgAACAGCAGCATTGTCGTCAG acgttggatgATGCAATAACAGGGCTGTGG acgttggatgTCCACGCTCACTTTTGAACC
Amplicon 1 length (bp) 121 121 109 110
Extending primer sequencea (5′→3′) GTTCTACTTCCTGAGCA GCATGGACAGGAGGA CCACACTTTGATAGTTTTTTTCC cccgaCCACTGCCTCCCTCGGGG
Forward primer for amplicon 2b (5′→3′) GTACCTGGACGAGCTGCC CCCGGCCTGAAAACATTTATTAC GGGCAGAATGAAAGCACAGT CCAGGTAGGTGAAGATGCAGA
Reverse primer for amplicon 2b (5′→3′) CCAGGCGCTTAATCCCATTT AACAGCAGCATTGTCGTCAG TCAGGGCTCACTTACCATCA CAAAGGACAGGGAGGCAGAG
Amplicon 2 length (bp) 356 307 293 291

aLower case letters in the primer sequences are 5′-end tags (forward and reverse primers for amplicon 1) or non-homologous sequences (extending primer) to increase the mass of primers.

bPrimers used for locus-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification (amplicon 2) and Sanger sequencing.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Predictive Analytics Software Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Genotype and allele frequencies were calculated, and Pearson’s χ 2 test was applied to genotypic and allelic frequency differences. A two-sided P value of 0.05 was set as the threshold for statistical significance [20].

Results and Discussion

The genotypic and allelic frequencies are summarized in Table 2. No deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was evident in the normal control cohort (P >0.05). Statistically significant differences in genotypic and allelic frequencies were identified in the FBXO2 variant rs9614 between patients and controls (P = 0.001 and 0.023, respectively; odds ratio = 0.819, 95% confidence interval = 0.690–0.973), especially between male patients and male controls (P <0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively; odds ratio = 0.724, 95% confidence interval = 0.580–0.903). The frequency of the minor C allele was 0.427 in patients and 0.477 in controls. No significant differences were found in genotypic and allelic frequencies in the FBXO12 variant rs6442117 between PD patients and total controls (P = 0.529 and 0.311, respectively; odds ratio = 1.099, 95% confidence interval = 0.916–1.319). Monomorphism (genotype CC) was found in the genotypes of rs28924120 and rs61733550, and no further evaluation was performed.

Table 2.

Genotypic and allelic distributions of rs9614 and rs6442117 in patients with sporadic PD and normal controls.

Variants Genotype/Allele Total PD (n = 502) Total controls (n = 556) Male PD (n = 302) Male controls (n = 335) Female PD (n = 200) Female controls (n = 221) P value (χ 2)a P value (χ 2)b P value (χ 2)c
rs9614 AA 178 142 111 77 67 65
AC 219 298 116 167 103 131
CC 105 116 75 91 30 25 0.001 (13.949) <0.001 (15.213) 0.247 (2.795)
A 575 582 338 321 237 261
C 429 530 266 349 163 181 0.023 (5.181) 0.004 (8.243) 0.953 (0.003)
rs6442117 TT 228 264 148 158 80 106
TC 214 237 122 144 92 93
CC 60 55 32 33 28 22 0.529 (1.272) 0.797 (0.453) 0.190 (3.321)
T 670 765 418 460 252 305
C 334 347 186 210 148 137 0.311 (1.028) 0.833 (0.045) 0.066 (3.381)

Significant P values <0.05 are shown in bold.

PD Parkinson’s disease.

aAll PD compared with total controls.

bMale PD compared with male controls.

cFemale PD compared with female controls.

PD is a genetically heterogeneous disorder, and great progress has been achieved in identifying disease-causing genes for monogenic PD since 1997. However, the genetic basis is yet to be described. This is particularly true regarding variants that either exert an increased risk or play a protective role against sporadic PD development [1, 4, 5]. The FBXO7 gene, located in chromosome 22q12.3, was first identified as the disease-causing gene for autosomal recessive early-onset parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome (PARK15) in a large Iranian pedigree [22]. To date, at least five mutations have been reported to be associated with the development of parkinsonism [2225].

Here, we performed a case-control study in a Han Chinese population cohort with 1058 participants to assess the role of four variants (FBXO2 rs9614, FBXO6 rs28924120, FBXO12 rs6442117, and FBXO41 rs61733550) in the development of sporadic PD. Statistically significant differences were only identified in the genotype and allele of the FBXO2 variant rs9614 (p.K118T), which was predicted to be “probably damaging” by Polymorphism Phenotyping version 2, indicating that it is associated with PD. The minor C allele of rs9614 may result in a decreased risk of PD in mainland Han Chinese, and it may be a biomarker for PD, especially in males. However, the other three variants, rs6442117, rs28924120, and rs61733550, play no apparent role in PD development.

The FBXO2 gene (OMIM 607112), located in chromosome 1p36.22, lies in tandem with the FBXO6 gene and spans over 6 kb. It consists of six exons, encodes a protein with 296 amino-acids, and is specifically expressed in the brain [32]. The protein, similar to FBXO7, belongs to the F-box protein family, which is defined by the presence of an F-box domain [33]. It is a component of the Skp1-cullin-F-box ubiquitin E3 ligases, and plays important roles in the ubiquitin-proteasome protein-degradation pathway and mitochondrial maintenance, both of which are robustly associated with PD pathogenesis [8, 9, 22, 25, 34, 35]. In this scenario, the primary hypothesis was confirmed and we reasoned that the rs9614 variant exerted a protective role in PD development in our participants, by sharing a common or similar molecular pathway with FBXO7. Many factors such as sample size limitations and the rarity of genotype or allele in the Han Chinese population may account for the negative results in the other three variants. Furthermore, cohort composition, clinical heterogeneity, methodology, synergistic or antagonistic interaction with other variants and environmental factors, and other confounding factors should be taken into account with regard to the findings in this study.

In summary, our findings suggest an association between the FBXO2 gene and development of PD. Given that different populations are genetically heterogeneous and variants have population-specific frequencies, additional gene variant studies in independent larger cohorts and in cohorts with different geographical origins, along with functional investigations of the candidate gene, are warranted to confirm any risk or protective roles of the four variants in PD development.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants and investigators involved in this study. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1306604), the National Basic Research Development Program of China (2014CB542400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271921 and 81670216), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2015JJ4088 and 2016JJ2166), the Construction Fund for Key Subjects of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics), the New Xiangya Talent Project of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (20150301), Mittal Students’ Innovative Project of Central South University (15MX50 and 15MX53), and the National-level College Students’ Innovative Training Plan Program of China (201610533288, 201610533290 and 201610533292).

Contributor Information

Hongwei Lu, Email: hwlv2226@163.com.

Hao Deng, Email: hdeng008@yahoo.com.

References

  • 1.Farlow JL, Robak LA, Hetrick K, Bowling K, Boerwinkle E, Coban-Akdemir ZH, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in familial Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:68–75. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Alonso-Navarro H, Garcia-Martin E, Agundez JA. Advances in understanding genomic markers and pharmacogenetics of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12:433–448. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2016.1158250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cai Z, Zeng W, Tao K. E Z, Wang B, Yang Q. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: roles in neuroprotection. Neurosci Bull. 2015;31:452–458. doi: 10.1007/s12264-015-1540-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Lau LM, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–535. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kalinderi K, Bostantjopoulou S, Fidani L. The genetic background of Parkinson’s disease: current progress and future prospects. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;134:314–326. doi: 10.1111/ane.12563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1591–1601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deng HX, Shi Y, Yang Y, Ahmeti KB, Miller N, Huang C, et al. Identification of TMEM230 mutations in familial Parkinson’s disease. Nat Genet. 2016;48:733–739. doi: 10.1038/ng.3589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martins-Branco D, Esteves AR, Santos D, Arduino DM, Swerdlow RH, Oliveira CR, et al. Ubiquitin proteasome system in Parkinson’s disease: a keeper or a witness? Exp Neurol. 2012;238:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin CH, Chen ML, Lai TT, Tai CH, Wu RM. Mutational analysis of FBXO7 gene in Parkinson’s disease in a Taiwanese population. Neurobiol Aging 2013, 34: 1713.e1–1713.e4. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Salat D, Noyce AJ, Schrag A, Tolosa E. Challenges of modifying disease progression in prediagnostic Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:637–648. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu S, Zhou J. Finding the ‘guilty’ gene variant of sporadic Parkinson’s disease via CRISPR/Cas9. Neurosci Bull. 2017;33:115–117. doi: 10.1007/s12264-016-0065-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yuan L, Song Z, Deng X, Zheng W, Guo Y, Yang Z, et al. Systematic analysis of genetic variants in Han Chinese patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33850. doi: 10.1038/srep33850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hernandez DG, Reed X, Singleton AB. Genetics in Parkinson disease: Mendelian versus non-Mendelian inheritance. J Neurochem. 2016;139(Suppl 1):59–74. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sudhaman S, Muthane UB, Behari M, Govindappa ST, Juyal RC, Thelma BK. Evidence of mutations in RIC3 acetylcholine receptor chaperone as a novel cause of autosomal-dominant Parkinson’s disease with non-motor phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2016;53:559–566. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toft M, Mata IF, Kachergus JM, Ross OA, Farrer MJ. LRRK2 mutations and Parkinsonism. Lancet. 2005;365:1229–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74809-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tan EK, Peng R, Teo YY, Tan LC, Angeles D, Ho P, et al. Multiple LRRK2 variants modulate risk of Parkinson disease: a Chinese multicenter study. Hum Mutat. 2010;31:561–568. doi: 10.1002/humu.21225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ross OA, Soto-Ortolaza AI, Heckman MG, Aasly JO, Abahuni N, Annesi G, et al. Association of LRRK2 exonic variants with susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:898–908. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70175-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Noyce AJ, Lees AJ, Schrag AE. The prediagnostic phase of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:871–878. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Soto-Ortolaza AI, Ross OA. Genetic susceptibility variants in parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22(Suppl 1):S7–S11. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yuan L, Song Z, Deng X, Xiong W, Yang Z, Deng H. Association of the MTHFR rs1801131 and rs1801133 variants in sporadic Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurosci Lett. 2016;616:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tan T, Song Z, Yuan L, Xiong W, Deng X, Ni B, et al. Genetic analysis of TREM2 variants in Chinese Han patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2016;612:189–192. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shojaee S, Sina F, Banihosseini SS, Kazemi MH, Kalhor R, Shahidi GA, et al. Genome-wide linkage analysis of a Parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome pedigree by 500 K SNP arrays. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:1375–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Di Fonzo A, Dekker MC, Montagna P, Baruzzi A, Yonova EH, Correia Guedes L, et al. FBXO7 mutations cause autosomal recessive, early-onset parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72:240–245. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000338144.10967.2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lohmann E, Coquel AS, Honore A, Gurvit H, Hanagasi H, Emre M, et al. A new F-box protein 7 gene mutation causing typical Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1130–1133. doi: 10.1002/mds.26266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Conedera S, Apaydin H, Li Y, Yoshino H, Ikeda A, Matsushima T, et al. FBXO7 mutations in Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy. Neurobiol Aging 2016, 40: 192.e1–192.e5. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:368–376. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yuan L, Deng X, Song Z, Yang Z, Ni B, Chen Y, et al. Genetic analysis of the RAB39B gene in Chinese Han patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2015, 36: 2907.e11–2907.e12. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Guo Y, Tan T, Deng X, Song Z, Yang Z, Yang Y, et al. TCEANC2 rs10788972 and rs12046178 variants in the PARK10 region in Chinese Han patients with sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2015, 36: 3335.e1–3335.e2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Buetow KH, Edmonson M, MacDonald R, Clifford R, Yip P, Kelley J, et al. High-throughput development and characterization of a genomewide collection of gene-based single nucleotide polymorphism markers by chip-based matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:581–584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xiu X, Song Z, Gao K, Deng X, Qi Y, Zhu A, et al. Genetic analysis of the FBXO48 gene in Chinese Han patients with Parkinson disease. Neurosci Lett. 2013;541:224–226. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Johansen P, Andersen JD, Borsting C, Morling N. Evaluation of the iPLEX® Sample ID Plus Panel designed for the Sequenom MassARRAY® system. A SNP typing assay developed for human identification and sample tracking based on the SNPforID panel. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2013, 7: 482–487. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Ilyin GP, Serandour AL, Pigeon C, Rialland M, Glaise D, Guguen-Guillouzo C. A new subfamily of structurally related human F-box proteins. Gene. 2002;296:11–20. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00867-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Deng H, Liang H, Jankovic J. F-box only protein 7 gene in parkinsonian-pyramidal disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:20–24. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kang J, Chung KC. The F-box protein FBXO7 positively regulates bone morphogenetic protein-mediated signaling through Lys-63-specific ubiquitination of neurotrophin receptor-interacting MAGE (NRAGE) Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:181–195. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1665-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Burchell VS, Nelson DE, Sanchez-Martinez A, Delgado-Camprubi M, Ivatt RM, Pogson JH, et al. The Parkinson’s disease-linked proteins Fbxo7 and Parkin interact to mediate mitophagy. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1257–1265. doi: 10.1038/nn.3489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neuroscience Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES