Skip to main content
Case Reports in Dermatology logoLink to Case Reports in Dermatology
. 2017 Sep 15;9(3):169–176. doi: 10.1159/000479922

Successful Topical Treatment of Pigmented Purpuric Lichenoid Dermatitis of Gougerot-Blum in a Young Patient: A Case Report and Summary of the Most Common Pigmented Purpuric Dermatoses

Jeyanthini Risikesan a, Mette Sommerlund b, Mette Ramsing c, Mattias Kristensen b, Uffe Koppelhus b,*
PMCID: PMC5637008  PMID: 29033823

Abstract

We report the case of a 12-year-old girl who presented a rash with reddish-brown patches on the trunk and extremities indicative of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot-Blum (PPLD). The histological findings were characteristic for PPLD, thus supporting the diagnosis. Topically administered corticosteroid led to a fast resolution of all symptoms. PPLD is not seen commonly in young patients and is most often described as responding poorly to treatment with topical corticosteroids. However, the case presented here shows both that PPLD can be seen in adolescence and that the condition may be treated successfully with an intense regime of topical corticosteroids. PPLD belongs to the group of pigmented purpuric dermatoses. The 5 most common pigmented purpuric dermatoses are summarized with respect to their clinical and paraclinical characteristics.

Keywords: Gougerot-Blum, Therapy, Topical corticosteroid, Pigmented purpuric dermatoses

Introduction

Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot-Blum (PPLD) is a chronic, relapsing, uncommon benign variant of pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD), first described by Gougerot and Blum in 1925. It typically affects middle-aged men, although it may present earlier in life [1, 2]. The etiology of PPD is unknown, but triggering or contributing factors such as systemic diseases, infections, drugs, foods, venous hypertension, exercise, and capillary fragility have been suggested [3, 4, 5]. Histologically, the condition is usually characterized by extravasation of red blood cells in the dermis and/or marked hemosiderin deposition. Also, a perivascular lichenoid lymphocytic infiltrate of T cells centered on the superficial small blood vessels of the skin is found suggesting that cell-mediated immunity may play a role in the pathogenesis [6, 7]. Clinically, PPLD is characterized by minute lichenoid papules that tend to fuse into plaques of various hues, with a predilection for the leg. However, unlike Schambergs disease, the lesions of PPLD may occur anywhere on the body [6]. The clinical features of PPLD may be confused with other PPDs. The PPDs are listed in Table 1a, and the differential diagnoses are presented in Table 1b. The pigmented purpuric lichenoid of Gougerot and Blum is likely a variant of Majocchi disease. It mainly affects middle-aged men. Majocchi disease is seen more commonly in females, unlike other PPDs. The two predominant PPDs in children and adolescents are lichen aureus and Majocchi disease. Lichen aureus and PPLD can appear as clusters of papules in children. The characteristics of the 5 most common forms of PPD with respect to the epidemiological parameters, clinical findings, histology, clinical course, and treatment possibilities are summarized in Table 2. Among the types of PPD, lichen aureus resembles PPLD the most, both clinically and histologically [1]. However, the histological pattern of PPLD is different from the pattern of the other PPDs. In the Gougerot and Blum variant of PPD, perivascular infiltrates of lymphocytes which is lichenoid are seen together with macrophages centered on the superficial small blood vessels of the skin with endothelial cell swelling and narrowing of the lumina. A skin biopsy is essential in confirming the diagnosis and to exclude cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, which in the early stages may resemble the clinical changes seen in PPD [8, 9].

Table 1.

Classification of the PPDs (a) and their differential diagnoses (b)

a Classification of the PPDs
 1. Majocchi disease (1896) – purpura annularis telangiectaticum
 2. Schamberg disease (1901)
 3. Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatosis of Gougerot and Blum (1925)
 4. Eczematoid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis (1953)
 5. Itching purpura of Lowenthal (1954)
 6. Lichen purpuricus (Martin, 1958; Haber, 1958), lichen aureus (Calnan, 1960)
 7. Transitory PPD (Osment, 1960)
 8. Linear PPD (Hersh and Schwayder, 1991)
 9. Granulomatous variant (Saito and Matsuoka, 1996)

b Differential diagnoses
 1. Purpuric drug eruption:
  – Carbromal-containing medications
   – acetyl, carbromal, meprobamate, mephenesin
  – Phenacetin
  – Barbiturates
  – Chlorothiazide
  – Gold
  – Isoniazid
  – Quinidine
  – Sulfonamides
  – Ampicillin
  – Zomepirac sodium
 2. Clothing purpura after contact with
  – Wool
  – Rubberized underwear
  – Elasticized underwear
 3. Stasis purpura (venous)
 4. Thrombocytopenia
 5. Hypergammaglobulinemic purpura
 6. Senile purpura
 7. Henoch-Schönlein purpura
 8. Viral illness
 9. Kaposi sarcoma
 10. Mycosis fungoides can present with an early eruption resembling PPD

Adapted from [6] (a) and [2] (b). PPD, pigmented purpuric dermatosis.

Table 2.

The clinical and paraclinical characteristics of PPLD and the 4 most common differential diagnoses

Majocchi disease Schamberg disease PPLD Eczematoid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis Lichen purpuricus (aureus)
Sex Predominantly seen in females Predominantly seen in males Predominantly seen in males Predominantly seen in males Both sexes

Frequency Rare Most common type of PPD Rare Uncommon Rare

Peak incidence Children and young adults Adolescents and young adults Middle-aged Middle-aged Children and young adults

Skin distribution Begins on the lower limb symmetrically and then extends to the trunk and upper extremities Most frequently bilaterally on the tibial regions, but may be unilateral or involve the thighs, buttocks, trunk, or upper extremities Predilection for the legs, and rarely on the trunk and thighs Legs with progression to the thighs, trunk, and upper extremities Lesions frequently occur bilaterally on the lower limbs, although can be unilateral and may affect the trunk and upper limbs; unlike other forms of PPD, the lesions of lichen aureus may also occur in a dermatomal distribution, or can follow the distribution of veins or arteries

Clinical presentation Variable number of annular erythematous plaques and patches, often with central clearing and atrophy Discrete reddish-brown patches that are bordered from red to brown; nonpalpable, pinpoint puncta; Cayenne pepper- like lesions Minute, lichenoid papules that tend to fuse into plaques of various hues Lesions are extensive and patients typically complain of severe pruritus Presents with yellowish or red papules or patches which may either itch or be asymptomatic

Histology Perivascular and predominantly band-like infiltrate of lymphocytes that extend to the overlying epidermis, showing vacuolar alteration of the basal layer and spongiosis; hemosiderin-laden macrophages, and extravasation of red blood cells within the lichenoid infiltrate Perivascular infiltrate of mononuclear cells in the upper dermis, endothelial cell swelling, extravasated red blood cells, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages Perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes which is lichenoid and macrophages centered on the superficial small blood vessels of the skin with endothelial cell swelling and narrowing of lumina Spongiosis with inflammation of the epidermis Perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate in a band-like pattern; hemosiderin-laden macrophages, and extravasation of red blood cells; the epidermis is unaffected

Remission Common Common Often chronic course but spontaneous remission may occur Spontaneous remission may occur, but recurrences may occur Spontaneous remission may occur, but recurrences may occur

Treatment The disorder is benign and self-limiting; treatment is not effective and the lesions may last several months to years Systemic steroids have been reported to result in clearance; ascorbic acid and antihistamines have been used with limited success; PUVA therapy is beneficial; narrow band UVB Difficult; topical and systemic steroids, elastic stockings, antipruritic topical preparations, systemic antihistamines, PUVA, griseofulvin, cyclosporin A, bioflavonoids, and ascorbic acid have been suggested Topical corticosteroids and antihistamines Oral corticosteroids; may resolve spontaneously

Extracted from [2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12]. PPLD, pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot-Blum; PPD, pigmented purpuric dermatosis.

Several regimens have been suggested for PPD including topical and systemic steroids, elastic stockings, antipruritic topical preparations, systemic antihistamines, PUVA, griseofulvin, cyclosporin A, bioflavonoids, and ascorbic acid. However, PPLD is considered difficult to treat and may often take a chronic course [2]. Here, we present a case of PPLD in a 12-year-old girl who was successfully treated with a potent topical corticosteroid.

Case Report

A 12-year-old girl was admitted to our department 8 weeks after a sudden onset of a skin rash. The rash was initially mainly located to the trunk and later spread peripherally to both the upper and lower extremities. The face, palms, and soles were unaffected. The rash was accompanied by a mild itching. It consisted of reddish-brown patches, some of them with a lichenoid thickened appearance. The elements had diameters of 2–5 mm (Fig. 1a, b). Diascopy was negative. The girl was otherwise healthy; she had no past medical history, took no medicine prior to the skin symptoms, and had no known genetic predispositions to skin disease. Physical examination revealed no signs of infection. A broad laboratory workout was performed including infection parameters, hematology, IgE, and tryptase. Also, a punch biopsy was taken showing hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and a predominantly superficial, papillary, diffuse, and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate (Fig. 2a). Basal keratinocytes showed hyperpigmentation and vacuolization, and lymphocytes were found in the epidermis, often in the basal layer representing a lichenoid inflammation. Also a number of plasma cells and mast cells were present and dermal vessels were dilated and red blood cells were escaping capillaries (extravasation) (Fig. 2b). No hemosiderin was present, neither interstitially nor in macrophages.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Clinical features of the reported case. The rash consisted of reddish-brown patches of different thickness with diameters of 2–5 mm. The elements were located to the trunk (a) and (especially the proximal parts of) the over and under extremities (b). Only a few excoriations were seen. (Private photos courtesy of the patient's farther.)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Histological features of the reported case. Punch biopsy from the hip showed hyperkeratosis, slight acanthosis, and a superficial lymphocytic infiltrate, most prominent in the papillary dermis. There is perivascular accentuation of the inflammation (HE ×40) (a). The basal keratinocytes show hyperpigmentation and vacuolization, and lymphocytes are found in the epidermis (lichenoid dermatosis). A diffuse and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate is seen, capillaries are dilated, and there is extravasation of red blood cells (purpura) (HE ×400) (b).

At first, cutaneous mastocytosis was suspected and treatment with oral desloratadine, 5 mg b.i.d., was prescribed in combination with a mild regimen of topical steroid in the form of hydrocortison-17-butyrat (0.1%) q.d. However, this treatment did not resolve any of the symptoms during the course of 2–3 weeks, and when the histological analysis was available and all the biochemical parameters were found to be normal, the diagnosis of purpuric dermatosis of the Gougerot and Blum type was made. A more intensive topical regimen with Mometasonfuroat (0.1%) b.i.d. (thick layers) for 2 weeks followed by a slow tapering was prescribed. The treatment was accompanied an almost complete remission of the skin symptoms within 3–4 weeks. Clinical follow-up after 12 months was normal.

Discussion

PPD are well characterized in the pediatric population, but the pigmented purpuric lichenoid of Gougerot and Blum is extremely rare in children [1, 2]. In the case presented here, a 12-year-old girl presented a clinical picture consistent with a PPD and the histology was characteristic for PPLD. It should be mentioned that in purpuric lesions hemosiderin is usually present, predominantly in the dermal macrophages; however, hemosiderin takes days to accumulate – and is not necessarily seen in early lesions.

The treatment of PPD is challenging, as no specific treatment exist. As mentioned in the Introduction, several regimens have been suggested for the treatment of PPD, but the reported results are conflicting [1, 6, 8, 10, 11]. Treatment with a potent topical corticosteroid may be tried but is often not effective [2]. Especially PPLD seems resistant to treatment and may take a chronical course. In the case reported here, complete remission was achieved with intensive treatment with Mometasonfuroat (0.1%). This finding may indicate that intensive treatment with a potent topical steroid should always be tried and at an as early stage of the disease as possible.

Statement of Ethics

Informed consent for publishing the case was obtained from the patient and her parents.

Disclosure Statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. There was no funding of this work.

References

  • 1.Baselga E, Drolet BA, Esterly NB. Purpura in infants and children. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37((5 Pt 1)):673–705. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(97)70105-1. quiz 6–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim DH, Seo SH, Ahn HH, Kye YC, Choi JE. Characteristics and clinical manifestations of pigmented purpuric dermatosis. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27:404–410. doi: 10.5021/ad.2015.27.4.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharma L, Gupta S. Clinicoepidemiological study of pigmented purpuric dermatoses. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2012;3:17–20. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.93486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Unal E, Ergul G. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis after taking a dietary supplement. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016;35:260–262. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2015.1094488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weiss KT, Karrer S, Landthaler M, Babilas P, Schreml S. Diet-induced pigmented purpuric dermatosis. Australas J Dermatol. 2014;55:e51–e53. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sardana K, Sarkar R, Sehgal VN. Pigmented purpuric dermatoses: an overview. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43:482–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Magro CM, Schaefer JT, Crowson AN, Li J, Morrison C. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis: classification by phenotypic and molecular profiles. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:218–229. doi: 10.1309/AQMU3JFE2A66LC7E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barnhill RL, Braverman IM. Progression of pigmented purpura-like eruptions to mycosis fungoides: report of three cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;19((1 Pt 1)):25–31. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(88)70147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toro JR, Sander CA, LeBoit PE. Persistent pigmented purpuric dermatitis and mycosis fungoides: simulant, precursor, or both? A study by light microscopy and molecular methods. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:108–118. doi: 10.1097/00000372-199704000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kocaturk E, Kavala M, Zindanci I, Zemheri E, Sarigul S, Sudogan S. Narrowband UVB treatment of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis (Gougerot-Blum) Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2009;25:55–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krizsa J, Hunyadi J, Dobozy A. PUVA treatment of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis (Gougerot-Blum) J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27((5 Pt 1)):778–780. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(08)80233-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miller K, Fischer M, Kamino H, Meehan S, Cohen D. Purpura annularis telangiectoides. Dermatol Online J. 2012;18:5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES