Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate beneficial effect of aqueous extract of Phyllanthus fraternus (AEPF) on bromobenzene (BB) induced changes on cytosolic glutathione S-transferase (GST) isozymes in rat liver. Administration of BB significantly decreased the activity of GST, however, prior administration of AEPF prevented the BB induced decrease in GST activity. Further the cytosolic GSTs were purified from 3 groups of animals (control, BB and AEPF+BB administered) and resolved into three protein bands on SDS-PAGE. Densitometric analysis showed a significant decrease in BB group compared to control. Further, 2D PAGE analysis resolved these proteins into 8 bands which were identified as five isozymes of alpha, two of Mu and one of theta by MALDI-TOF MS and also observed decreased levels of isozymes in BB group. However, on prior administration of AEPF significantly prevented the BB induced decrease in GSTs and restored to normal levels.
Abbreviations: AEPF, aqueous extract of Phyllanthus fraternus; BB, bromobenzene; CDNB, 1-chlro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene; CHAPS, (3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammino]-1-propane sulfonate); 2DE, two dimensional gel electrophoresis; DTT, dithiothretol; GSTs, glutathione S transferases; IPG, immobilized pH gradient; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry; PMF, peptide mass fingerprint; ROS, reactive oxygen species
Keywords: Bromobenzene, Phyllanthus fraternus, Oxidative stress, Glutathione S transferase
Highlights
-
•
AEPF prevented bromobenzene induced decline in GST activity in rat liver.
-
•
BB decreases GST (GSTA3, M1 and A2) and on AEPF administration restores to control.
-
•
Purified GSTs consisted of 8 isozymes and identified as 5 α, 2 µ and 1 Ѳ.
-
•
AEPF suppressed BB induced decreased GST isozymes and their degradation.
1. Introduction
Glutathione S-transferases (GST) (EC 2.5.1.18) are ubiquitous multifunctional enzymes and represent 10% of cytosolic proteins and catalyze the conjugation of toxic xenobiotics and oxidatively produced compounds, and thus facilitate their metabolism, removal and provide protection against oxidants [1], [2]. There are three major families that exhibit GST activities are cytosolic, mitochondrial and microsomal [3]. Cytosolic GSTs comprise a large family of detoxification enzymes that function as hetero or homodimers and are classified into seven classes termed as alpha (α), mu (µ), theta (θ), pi (π), zeta (ζ), chi (χ) and sigma (σ) [4], [5], [6]. The most abundant classes expressed in mammalian tissues are Alpha (GSTA), Mu (GSTM) and Pi (GSTP) [7], [8]. The pattern of expression of these isozymes are specific for species, age and organs [9]. These enzymes also show variable expression towards certain highly reactive chemical contaminants and remarkable affect on resistance/sensitivity to chemical toxicities. Variations in GST isozyme expression have profound effects on health. For example, low expression of human GSTM is associated with an increased incidence of bladder [10], and colon cancer [11]. Therapies that increase the expression of GST isozymes may be useful in disease prevention.
Medicinal plants are used to prevent many diseases since ancient days, and there is a growing interest in the pharmacological evaluation of various plants used in Indian traditional system of medicine. Phyllanthus fraternus (Euphorbiaceae), a medicinal herb commonly known as nelausari, distributed in India, Pakistan, South Arabia, Africa and West Indies [12]. It is widely used in traditional and folk medicine for the treatment of various diseases of liver [13] and also as natural remedy for a number of viral infections [14]. The aqueous and alcoholic extracts were reported to have an antidiabetic activity in alloxan induced diabetes [15].
Bromobenzene (BB) is a toxic chemical that is converted to bromobenzene 3, 4-oxide in liver, which binds GSH and they depletes it. This leads to an impaired protection against reactive oxygen species (ROS) [16] which leads to lipid peroxidation and altered calcium homeostasis that damage the cell and cell organelles [17]. Earlier studies from this laboratory have shown that mitochondrial dysfunction in liver caused by the administration of thioacetamide [18] or carbon tetrachloride [19] or alcohol [20] or allyl alcohol [21] or bromobenzene [22] could be prevented by prior administration of AEPF. Bromobenzene induced mitochondrial dysfunction was also detected in rat kidney and efficiently protected by prior administration of AEPF [23]. Not much information is available on BB induced changes on the pattern of cytosolic GST isozymes and protective effect of Phyllanthus fraternus extract in rat liver. The present study is aimed to isolate and characterize the GST isozymes in BB administered rat liver and protective role of Phyllanthus fraternus extract.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animals
Male Wistar rats weighing 100±40 g were used in this study. They were kept in the animal house facility of University of Hyderabad in polypropylene cages at an ambient temperature of 25±2 °C and humidity of 45–60% with 12 h day – night cycles. They had free access to standard rodent pelleted food (Hindustan lever Ltd., India) and water ad libitum. The growth of the rats was monitored for at least one week before starting the experiment. This study was carried out with approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IEAC) of University of Hyderabad.
2.2. Chemicals
Epoxy activated sepharose 6B and glutathione (GSH) were purchased from sigma chemical co. (St. louis, MO, USA). IPG strips, IPG buffer, DTT, CHAPS and urea were obtained from Amersham biosciences, NJ, USA. Rabbit polyclonal anti-GST antibody, Goat anti- rabbit IgG ALP conjugate secondary antibody, BCIP-NBT substrate for alkaline phosphatase and protein molecular weight marker were obtained from Bangalore Genei, India. All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were obtained from local firms.
2.3. Plant material and preparation of AEPF
Plants were collected from their natural habitat in the University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad-500046, India and voucher specimen with a number OHS-SG-1005, has been deposited at the Herbarium, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India [22]. The whole plant including roots were cleaned with water, air dried and powdered using mortar and pestle. 60g of this powder was mixed with 300 ml of double distilled water followed by centrifugation at 3000g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, filtered (by using cheese cloth) and used as an aqueous extract in this study. The dry weight was determined gravimetrically by drying the extract in hot air oven for 4 h. The yield of the extract was 5% (w/w).
2.4. Experimental design
The animals were divided into 4 groups of 6 rats in each.
Group A: Rats received a single dose of 0.1 ml of coconut oil through intragastric tube and sacrificed after 19 h. This is control group.
Group B: Received a single dose of 10 mmol of bromobenzene in 0.1 ml of coconut oil through intragastric tube and sacrificed after 19 h. This is BB treated group.
Group C: Received AEPF orally (100 mg/kg body wt.) for a period of 8 days and sacrificed 19 h after the last dose. This is AEPF treated group.
Group D: Received AEPF orally (100 mg/kg body wt.) for 8 days and then after 24 h of last dose a single dose of 10 mmol of bromobenzene in 0.1 ml of coconut oil was give through intragastric tube and sacrificed after 19 h. This is BB+AEPF treated group.
All 4 groups were fasted for 43 h before sacrifice (24 h before and 19 h after the plant extract/toxin/coconut oil administration).
2.5. Estimation of flavonoids, total phenols and tannins
The presence of secondary metabolites from AEPF was quantitatively determined by adopting standard protocols. Flavonoids were estimated by Swain and Hillis [24], tannins by Vanillin–HCl method of Price et al. [25] and total phenols by Folin–Ciocalteu method of Singleton et al. [26]. The results were expressed as mg/gm dry weight.
2.6. Preparation of the glutathione – affinity matrix
Affinity matrix was prepared according to Simmons and Vander Jagt [27]. Epoxy activated Sepharose 6B (16.3 g) was washed with 2 l of Milli Q water on Buchner funnel, followed by 200 ml of 44 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0. The slurry was transferred to a side armed conical flask and the volume was adjusted to 100 ml with the same buffer and nitrogen gas was passed through for 5 min. To this, 325 mM GSH (100 mg/ml) of pH 7.0 was added and coupling was allowed to proceed for 24 h at 37 °C with gentle shaking on a Dubnoff metabolic incubator. The coupled gel was washed with 400 ml of Milli Q water and the remaining active groups were blocked by allowing the gel to stand in 1 M ethanolamine for 4 h. Then the gel was washed sequentially with 400 ml each of 0.5 M KCl in 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 4.0), 0.5 M KCl in 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.0) and with starting buffer of the column.
2.7. Preparation of tissue homogenates
Rat liver was homogenized in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.25 M sucrose and 1 mM phenyl methane sulphonyl fluoride (PMSF) using a glass homogenizer which was immersed in an ice bottle and care was taken to minimize the froth formation. The homogenate was passed through two layers of cheese cloth and centrifuged at 100,000g at 4 °C for 30 min. The resulting supernatant is used as crude cytosolic fraction.
2.8. GSTs assay
GST activity was measured at 25 °C using CDNB (1-chlro-2,4-dinitrobenzene) as a substrate to determine total GST activity according to Habig et al. [28].
2.9. Purification of GSTs from rat liver cytosol
The crude cytosolic fraction was subjected to dialysis at 4 °C for 1 h in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer without KCl to remove the endogenous GSH, which may interfere with binding of GSTs to affinity column. Then the dialyzed sample was diluted with equilibration buffer (10 mM potassium phosphate buffer with KCl pH 7.0) and loaded on to the GSH –Sepharose 6B affinity column which was previously equilibrated with equilibration buffer and washed with the same buffer. The bound GSTs were then eluted with elution buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and 50 mM GSH) and eluted fractions in 2 ml volume were collected and measured the protein and enzyme activity. Active fractions were pooled and then concentrated by using amicon filters (cut off 5 kDa, Millipore). Protein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm in the chromatographic fractions and the protein in the crude cytosol and purified GSTs were measured according to methods of Gornall et al. [29] and Bradford [30], respectively.
2.10. SDS–PAGE and Western blotting analysis
Proteins were separated on 12% polyacrylamide gels by a modified method of Laemmli, [31] and were visualized either by silver or coomassie staining [32]. Western blotting analysis using rabbit anti-GST polyclonal antibody against the three subunits was carried out according to Towbin et al. [33]. Densitometric analysis was performed using image J software (NIH, USA).
2.11. Two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE)
Purified cytosolic GSTs were rehydrated for 1 h in a volume of 350 μl in a reswelling tray on immobiline dry strip (IPG) of 18 cm pH 6–11 in 8 M Urea, 2% (v/v) CHAPS, 15 mM DTT, 2% (v/v) IPG buffer pH 6–11% and 1% bromophenol blue. Isoelectric focusing of samples was performed on a Multiphor II Electrophoresis unit for 60,000 V h using the following programme: 12 h at 20 V; 500 V for 30 min (gradient); 500 V for 30 min (step); 8000 V for 3 h (gradient); 8000 V to reach 60,000 V h. Subsequently, Immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips were equilibrated for 30 min in equilibration buffer (containing 6 M urea, 29.3% (w/v) glycerol, 2% SDS in 75 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.8, containing 0.001% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 0.2 g acrylamide and 0.1 g DTT). Second dimension electrophoresis was performed according to the method of Gorg et al. [34] on 12.5% polyacrylamide gels using the DALT multiple casting chamber (Amersham Biosciences). Molecular masses were determined by running standard protein markers (Bangalore Genei). Gels were silver stained for visualization of proteins. Scanning of the gels was done with Typhoon Trio+(GE health care) and the images were stored in tiff formats.
2.12. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS analysis)
The GST spots separated on 2D Electrophoresis were excised, destained with 1:1 mix of 30 mM potassium ferricyanide and 100 mM sodium thiosulphate and incubated at room temperature for 30 min followed by 5 min in 100% acetonitrile. After drying, the spots were incubated with 10 mM DTT at 56 °C for 1 h followed by 55 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature in the dark for 45 min. Furthermore, after the spots had been washed and dried with 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) and 100% acetonitrile (CH3CN) respectively, they were incubated with 10 ng of trypsin at 37 °C overnight. The digested peptides were extracted by adding acetonitrile:trifluoroacetic acid (TFA):water (50:1:49) and vortex the tubes for 5 min. The extracted peptides were mixed with an equal volume of HCCA matrix (10 mg/ml α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% (v/v) CH3CN, 0.1% TFA, 2:1 ratio) and 2 μl of this mixture was applied onto a MALDI target plate. MALDI-TOF-MS peptide mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker Daltonics Autoflex, Bremen, Germany. PMF searches were done within the publicly available MASCOT search tool and Rattus norvegicus of the Swiss Prot non-redundant database provided by Matrix Science Ltd., UK. Protein identification searches allowed carbamidomethylation of cysteines as a fixed modification and oxidisation of methionines, acetylation of peptide N-terminus and glutamine to pyroglutamic acid, also of the peptide N-terminus as possible modifications. Trypsin was specified as the enzymatic choice to generate peptide fragments. 1–2 maximum missed cleavage was allowed with a peptide mass tolerance of 0.2–1.2 Da.
2.13. Statistical analysis
All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD). “Student's” t-test was used for statistical analysis and statistical significance was defined as P<0.05 or P<0.001.
3. Results
The protective effect of prior administration of an AEPF against BB induced changes on the levels of cytosolic GST isozymes in rat liver was studied. For calculating the protective effect, the results of all groups were first normalized relative to control, which was taken as 100. The percent protective effect was calculated as [100/100−B group value]×(value of group D−value of group B). In other words a 100% protection (on a given parameter) means that the value is back to the control level which is normalized as 100.
Initially to know the hepatotoxicity of aqueous extract of Phyllanthus fraternus (AEPF) increasing dose of 20, 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/Kg body weight was administered to male wistar rats. The protection observed was concentration dependant and saturated (i.e. 90–100% protection) at the dose of 100 mg/Kg body weight. Administration of the AEPF up to 400 mg/Kg body weight did not show any toxic effects on liver as compared with controls. Lipid peroxidation was used as a parameter for this study. Hence, 100 mg/Kg body weight was chosen for all our studies to demonstrate the protective effect against the hepatotoxicity induced by thioacetamide [18] or carbon tetrachloride [19] or alcohol [20] or allyl alcohol [21] or bromobenzene [22] and including for current study. So in the present study also, a dose of 100 mg AEPF was used.
3.1. Effect of administration of AEPF on the BB induced decrease GST activity
The activity of crude cytosolic GST was significantly decreased (46%) due to administration of BB (group B) when compared to control (group A). However, on prior administration of AEPF (group D) offered a significant protection of 74% (Fig. 1). Control group and AEPF extract administered groups were not different when compared with each other and hence only one group i.e. control group was used for all further studies.
Fig. 1.
Effect of administration of bromobenzene with or without the prior administration of aqueous extract of Phyllanthus fraternus (AEPF) on GST activity in the liver. Values are given as percent control, and are mean±SD of 6 rats. GST activity was expressed as units per mg protein. ap<0.05 vs. control group (Group A); bp<0.001 vs. BB group (Group B). One unit of enzyme is defined as 1 μmol of thioether formed per minute. The control value of GST is 5.3±0.14.
3.2. Purification of cytosolic GSTs from rat liver
Liver cytosolic GSTs were purified through GSH–Sepharose affinity column to homogeneity from groups A, B and D. The extent of purification fold obtained was 40 (with a yield of 78%), 15 (with a yield of 69%) and 23 (with a yield of 76%) in the groups of A, B and D, respectively.
Affinity chromatography purified cytosolic GSTs were separated on 12% SDS–PAGE and observed as three protein bands with molecular weights of 25.6, 27 and 28 kDa which were designated as A2, M1 and A3 (Fig. 2, lanes 6 and 7) respectively.
Fig. 2.
12% SDS PAGE analysis of affinity purified GSTs. Lane1: Marker, 2: Crude extract, 3: Dialyzed, 4: Flow through, 5: Wash, 6 and 7: Elutions.
3.3. AEPF prevents BB induced cytosolic GST degradation in the rat liver
Purified GSTs and crude cytosolic GSTs isolated from the groups A, B and D were separated on SDS-PAGE and analyzed on western blotting. The results were depicted in Fig. 3. Densitometric analysis showed a significant decrease on the levels of A3, M1 and A2 subunit proteins in the group B when compared with group A in both crude cytosolic and purified GSTs. In affinity purified GSTs of group B there were additional bands (~13 and 15 kDa) at the lower end of the gel which were the degraded products of subunits A3 and M1 (panel D). These were further identified through MALDI-TOF. However, on prior administration of AEPF increased the levels of these three subunits to control level and offered significant protection (p<0.001).
Fig. 3.
A representative of one of the SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis for liver crude cytosolic and purified GSTs from four independent experiments, 10 μg protein was loaded. β- Actin used as a loading control. Lane 1: Markers, lane 2: Control, lane 3: BB administered, lane 4: AEPF+BB administered. Densitometric analysis of purified GSTs A3, M1 and A2 of GST in arbitrary units (Western blot). aP<0.001 vs. Group A and bP<0.001 vs group B.
3.4. AEPF suppresses the BB induced decreased levels of expression of GST isozymes and their degradation
The purified GSTs were resolved into eight spots on a pH scale of 6–11 by 2D PAGE. Panels I, II and III in Fig. 4 shows 2D gel electrophoretic pattern of affinity purified cytosolic GSTs of groups A, B and D respectively. Each spot was analyzed on MALDI-TOF MS to generate peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) data (Fig. 5A, a representative of spot 1 and others were given as Fig. 5B–H in Supplementary data). Based on peptide mass fingerprints, spectra (specific peaks from PMF spectra) and MASCOT search, the spots were identified as five isozymes of alpha (GSTA1 to A5) and two of Mu (GSTM1 and M2) and one of theta (GSTT1) in rat liver as shown in Table 1. The isozymes of GSTs were quantitated respectively from the groups of A, B and D by densitometric analysis (Table 2). In group B there was a significant decrease in the levels of all the isozymes of the GSTs i.e. A4, M2, T1, A1, A5, M1, A3 and A2 (spots 1–8) by 27%, 44%, 25%,15%, 20%, 19%, 10% and 10% respectively compared with group A. In addition, two more spots (9 and 10) appeared in group B which were identified by MALDI-TOF MS analysis as the degraded products of A3 and M1 (Panel D in Fig. 3). However, prior administration of AEPF (group D) significantly increased the levels of all the isozymes of GSTs like A4, M2, T1, A1, A5, M1, A3 and A2 and offered good protection of 150%, 100%, 55%, 120%, 97%, 36%, 100% and 100% respectively compared to group B and the spots 9 and 10 (degraded products of A3 and M1) were not detected.
Fig. 4.
Representative images of one of the two dimensional gel electrophoretic analyses of rat liver cytosolic affinity purified GSTs from four independent experiments. 40 μg proteins were resolved on a pH 6–11 IPG strip in the first dimension and separated on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE in the second dimension and silver stained as described in Section 2. The spots were identified by MALDI TOF-MS. Panels I: Control, II: BB administered, III: AEPF+BB administered.
Fig. 5.
A representative of mass spectra of spot1 of the control. The data represent the peptide mass fingerprints generated by MALDI TOF MS analysis. The figure represents a corresponding protein to GST-A4.
Table 1.
MALDI-TOF MS analysis of affinity purified cytosolic GSTs of rat liver separated on 2DE.
| Spot no. (rGST) isozymes |
Swiss accession number | pI (theoretical) |
Molecular weight (theoretical), Da |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (A4) | P14942 | 6.77 | 25,550 |
| 2 (M2) | P08010 | 6.90 | 25,837 |
| 3 (T1) | Q01579 | 7.12 | 27,735 |
| 4 (A1) | P00502 | 8.87 | 25,388 |
| 5 (A5) | P46418 | 8.42 | 25,347 |
| 6 (M1) | P04905 | 8.27 | 25,360 |
| 7 (A3) | P04904 | 8.78 | 25,657 |
| 8 (A2) | P04903 | 8.89 | 25,558 |
Table 2.
Densitometric analysis of GST isozymes from groups control, BB and AEPF+BB.
| Spot no. |
Control (A) |
BB (B) |
AEPF+BB (D) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (A4) | 100% | 27a | 150b |
| 2 (M2) | 100% | 44a | 100b |
| 3 (T1) | 100% | 25a | 55b |
| 4 (A1) | 100% | 15a | 120b |
| 5 (A5) | 100% | 20a | 97b |
| 6 (M1) | 100% | 19a | 36b |
| 7 (A3) | 100% | 10a | 100b |
| 8 (A2) | 100% | 10a | 100b |
Values are given as percent control.
p<0.05 vs. Group A.
p<0.05 vs. Group B.
3.5. AEPF extract exhibited higher levels of phytochemicals
The quantity of secondary metabolites like flavonoids, phenolics and tannins in the AEPF extract were measured and shown in Table 3. AEPF showed high levels of total phenolics and flavonoids and offered significant protection against bromobenzene induced oxidative stress which further effects on GST degradation and expression.
Table 3.
Levels of flavonoids, polyphenols and tannins in aqueous extract of Phyllanthus fraternus (AEPF).
| S. no | Constituent of PF extract | Amount (mg/g dry wt) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Flavonoids | 1.84±0.1 |
| 2. | Total phenols | 2.16±0.3 |
| 3. | Tannins | 1.56±0.15 |
Values are given as mean±SD of 5 samples.
4. Discussion
GSTs represent one of the major cellular defense mechanisms against electrophilic xenobiotics and their metabolites. In this study, we demonstrated the beneficial effect of AEPF on BB induced changes on cytosolic GSTs. The total GST activity in rat liver cytosol was significantly decreased in the BB administered compared to control. This effect can lead to toxic consequences, because the detoxification activity will be less and other electrophilic compounds will not be detoxified leading to the damage of DNA, proteins and lipids. However, prior administration of AEPF increased the GST activity which indicates the induction of the detoxifying system to enhance the conjugational capacity for inactivation of electrophiles. Similar enhanced activity of GST with methanol extract of Alisma orientale rhizome was reported by Hur et al. [35].
In rat liver, the GST isozymes are mainly made up of three major subunits, the GSTA3, M1 and A2. Each subunit has specific function [36]. Previous studies had shown the role of alpha class GSTs in the defense against oxidative stress [37]. In this study, administration of BB induced a significant decrease on the levels of these 3 subunits in crude cytosolic as well as affinity purified GSTs. However, in the affinity purified GSTs two extra bands were seen at the lower end on the blot (Fig. 3 panel D) as well as on 2DE (Fig. 4 panel II) which are identified and confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS analysis as the degraded products of the GST A3 and M1 subunits indicating the toxic effects of BB. However, prior administration of AEPF showed a significant increase in the levels of these GST subunits and no degraded products of alpha subunits were identified. These results suggested that AEPF role in counteracting the oxidative stress induced by BB.
Recent studies indicated that antioxidant response element (ARE), a cis-acting regulatory element in the gene promoter, plays a key role in regulating mRNA expression of phase II drug metabolizing enzymes such as GSTs, NAD(P)H: ubiquinone oxidoreductase and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase [38]. Natural compounds like flavonoids (quercetin and flavone), isothiocyanates, orthophenols and sulforaphane have the ability to induce enzymes of phase II metabolism through a mechanism involving antioxidant response element (ARE). Most naturally occurring phenolic acids like protocatechuic and tannic acids are known to modulate the activity of GSTs (mGSTA, mGSTP, mGSTM and mGSTT) in hepatic tissues and exhibit antioxidant activity [39], [40]. In this study, presence of high phenolics and flavonoids in AEPF appear to be responsible for the up-regulation of the isoenzyme of GSTs and thus offer protection against oxidative stress. Increased mRNA expression by quercetin was reported in rat liver for GSTA3, GSTP1 and GSTT3 and also observed moderately increased GSTM (Odbayer et al. [40]). Diet-derived compounds like ortho-phenols [41], butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) [42], sulforaphane [43] and flavone [44], [45], [46] reported to up-regulate the GST activity.
In conclusion, our findings indicated that the prior administration of phenolic rich AEPF showed beneficial effect against the BB induced changes on cytosolic GST isozymes and thus prevented BB induced oxidative stress. These results indicate that AEPF may serve an effective chemopreventive agent against oxidative stress induced hepatic diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors, SG thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, India, for providing the financial assistance in the form of JRF/SRF. VR is also thankful to DBT CREBB for financial support. Help rendered by Prof. S. Dayananda and his research scholars Paul and Toshi, Department of animal sciences, Dr. S. Rajagopal, department of biochemistry and Monica, Scientific technician university of Hyderabad for 2DE and MALDI-TOF MS analysis are highly acknowledged.
Footnotes
Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.04.001.
Contributor Information
Sriram Gopi, Email: gopsriram@gmail.com.
Ramakrishna Vadde, Email: vrkbtbi@yogivemanauniversity.ac.in, vrkrishna70@gmail.com.
Oruganti H. Setty, Email: ohssl@uohyd.ernet.in, ohsetty@gmail.com.
Appendix A. Transparency document
Supplementary material
.
Supplementary material: Supplementary Figures 5B to 5H. Mass spectra’s obtained by MALDI-TOF MS analyse. Supplementary Figure 5B to 5H. A representative of Mass spectra of spots 2–8.
.
References
- 1.Halliwell B. The wanderings of free radicals. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009;46:531–542. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mazzetti A.P., Fiorile M.C., Primavera A., Bello M.L. Glutathione transferases and neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem. Int. 2015;82:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hayes J.D., Flanagan J.U., Jowsey I.R. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005;45:51–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Strange R.C., Spiteri M.A., Ramachandran S., Fryer A.A. Glutathione S-transferase family of enzymes. Mutat. Res. 2001;48:221–226. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00206-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oakley A. Glutathione transferases: a structural perspective. Drug Metab. Rev. 2011;43:138–151. doi: 10.3109/03602532.2011.558093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wu B., Dong D. Human cytosolic glutathione transferases: structure, function, and drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012;33:656–668. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Egaas E., Falls J.G., Dauterman W.C. A study of gender, strain and age differences in mouse liver glutathione-S-transferase. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 1995;110:35–40. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(94)00079-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gopal P.V., Sriram A.V., Sharma D., Singh R. Glutathione-S-transferase in the ageing rat brain cerebrum and the effect of chlorpromazine. Gerontology. 2000;46:7–11. doi: 10.1159/000022126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rowe J.D., Nieves E., Listowsky I. Subunit diversity and tissue distribution of human glutathione S-transferases: interpretations based on electrospray ionization-MS and peptide sequence-specific antisera. Biochem. J. 1997;325(Pt 2):481–486. doi: 10.1042/bj3250481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Daly A.K., Thomas D.J., Cooper J., Pearson W.R., Neal D.E., Idle J.R. Homozygous deletion of gene for glutathione S- transferase M1 in bladder cancer. BMJ. 1993;307:481–482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Strange R.C., Matharoo B., Faulder G.C., Jones P., Cotton W., Elder J.B., Deakin M. The human glutathione S-transferases: a case-control study of the incidence of the GST1 0 phenotype in patients with adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 1991;12:25–28. doi: 10.1093/carcin/12.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.S. Abedin, J.S. Mossa, M.S. AI-said, M.A. Ai-Yahya, in: S.A. Chaudhury (Ed.), Flora of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, National Agriculture and Water Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2001, p. 298.
- 13.K.R. Kirtikar, B.D. Basu, in: Lalit Mohan Babu, et al., Indian Medicinal Plants, vol. 1, second ed., Allahabad, 1975, p. 2225.
- 14.Jayaram S., Thyagarajan S.P., Sumathi S., Manjula S., Malathi S., Madangopalan N. Efficiency of Phyllanthus treatment in acute viral hepatitis A, B and non A and non B; an open clinical trial. Ind. J. Virol. 1997;13:59–64. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Garg M., Dhar V.J., Kalia A.N. Antidiabetic and antioxidant potential of Phyllanthus fraternus in alloxan induced diabetic animals. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2008;4:138–143. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jollow D.J., Mitchell J.R., Zampaglione N., Gillette J.R. Bromobenzene induced liver necrosis: protective role of glutathione and evidence for 3,4-bromobenzene oxide as the hepatotoxic metabolite. Pharmacology. 1974;11:151–169. doi: 10.1159/000136485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang B.H., Zuzel K.A., Rahman K., Billington D. Protective effects of aged garlic extract against bromobenzene toxicity to precision cut rat liver slices. Toxicology. 1998;126:213–222. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(98)00018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.P. Padma, O.H. Setty, Protective effect of Phyllanthus fraternus against thioacetamide induced mitochondrial dysfunction, J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr., 22, 1997, pp. 113–123.
- 19.Padma P., Setty O.H. Protective effect of Phyllanthus fraternus against carbon tetra chloride induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Life Sci. 1999;64:2411–2417. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00195-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sebastian T., Setty O.H. Protective effect of Phyllanthus fraternus against ethanol induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Alcohol. 1999;17:29–34. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(98)00029-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sailaja R., Setty O.H. Protective effect of Phyllanthus fraternus against allyl alcohol induced oxidative stress in liver mitochondria. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;105:201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gopi S., Setty O.H. Protective effect of Phyllanthus fraternus against bromobenzene induced mitochondrial dysfunction in rat liver mitochondria. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010;8:2170–2175. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ramakrishna V., Gopi S., Setty O.H. Protective effect Phyllanthus fraternus again bromobenzene induced mitochondrial dysfunction in rat kidney. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2012;10(5):328–333. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Swain T., Hillis W.E. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1959;10:63–68. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Price M.L., Van Scooc S., Butler L.G. A critical evaluation of the vanillin reaction as an assay for tannins and sorghum grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1978;26:1214. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Singleton V., Orthofer R., Lameula-Raventós M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Method Enzymol. 1999;299:152–178. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Simmons P.C., Vander jagt D.L. Purification of glutathione S – transferases from human liver glutathione affinity chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 1977;82:334–341. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90169-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Habig W.H., Pabst M.J., Jakoby W.B. Glutathione S-transferase. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Biol. Chem. 1974;249:7130–7139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gornall A.G., Bardawill C.J., David M.M. Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 1949;17:751–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blum H., Beier H., Gross H.J. Silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis. 1987;8:93–99. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon L. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets, procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1979;76:4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gorg A. The current state of two dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis. 1988;9:531–546. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150090913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hur J.M., Choi J.W., Park J.C. Effects of methanol extract of Alisma orientale rhizome and its major component, alisol B 23-acetate on hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes in rats treated with bromobenzene. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2007;30:1543–1549. doi: 10.1007/BF02977323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Eaten D.L., Bammler T.K. Concise review of the glutathione S-transferases and their significance to toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 1977;49:156–164. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/49.2.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sharma R., Yang Y., Sharma A., Awasthi S., Awasthi Y.C. Antioxidant role of glutathione S-transferases: protection against oxidant toxicity and regulation of stress-mediated apoptosis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2004;6:289–300. doi: 10.1089/152308604322899350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu C., Li C.Y., Kong A.N. Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2005;28:249–268. doi: 10.1007/BF02977789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Krajka-Kuzniak V., Szaefer H., Dubowska W. Hepatic and extrahepatic expression of glutathione S-transferase isozymes in mice and its modulation by naturally occurring phenolic acids. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008;25:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2007.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Odbayer T.O., Kimura T., Tsushida T., Ide T. Isoenzyme specific up-regulation of glutathione transferase and aldo-keto reductase mRNA expression by dietary quercetin in rat liver. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2009;325:121–130. doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0026-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fiander H., Schneider H. Dietary ortho phenols that induce glutathione S-transferase and increase the resistance of cells to hydrogen peroxide are potential cancer chemopreventives that act by two mechanisms: the alleviation of oxidative stress and the detoxification of mutagenic xenobiotics. Cancer Lett. 2000;156:117–124. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(00)00368-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nijhoff W.A., Peters W.H. Induction of rat hepatic and intestinal glutathione S-transferases by dietary butylated hydroxyanisole. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992;4:596–600. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(92)90456-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Munday R., Munday C.M. Induction of phase II detoxification enzymes in rats by plant-derived isothiocyanates: comparison of allyl isothiocyanate with sulforaphane and related compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:1867–1871. doi: 10.1021/jf030549s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nijhoff W.A., Bosboom M.A., Smidt M.H., Peters W.H. Enhancement of rat hepatic and gastrointestinal glutathione and glutathione S-transferases by alpha-angelicalactone and flavone. Carcinogenesis. 1995;16:607–612. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.3.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kang K.W., Park E.Y., Kim S.G. Activation of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta by 2′-amino-3′-methoxyxavone (PD98059) leads to the induction of glutathione S-transferase A2. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:475–482. doi: 10.1093/carcin/24.3.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burns S.A., Hong Y.J., Mitchell A.E. Direct liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the detection of glutathione S transferase isozymes and investigation of their expression in response to dietary flavone. J. Chromatogr. B. 2004;809:331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material
Supplementary material: Supplementary Figures 5B to 5H. Mass spectra’s obtained by MALDI-TOF MS analyse. Supplementary Figure 5B to 5H. A representative of Mass spectra of spots 2–8.





