Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Med Clin North Am. 2016 Jul;100(4):791–805. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.03.006

Pharmacologic Therapy in Men’s Health

Hypogonadism, Erectile Dysfunction, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Kathryn E Berkseth a,*, Arthi Thirumalai b, John K Amory c
PMCID: PMC5639879  NIHMSID: NIHMS909997  PMID: 27235615

INTRODUCTION

Male reproductive, sexual, and urologic health concerns are common presenting complaints in both primary care and subspecialty clinic settings. This article reviews current pharmacologic treatment options for 3 common men’s health concerns: hypogonadism, erectile dysfunction (ED), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

TESTOSTERONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN MALE HYPOGONADISM

Male hypogonadism, defined as signs and symptoms of low testosterone combined with confirmation of low serum testosterone concentration, is estimated to affect 2% to 12.8% of adult men.1 The prevalence of hypogonadism is higher among certain populations, including the elderly and the obese. It is anticipated that the prevalence of male hypogonadism in the United States will likely increase over the coming years due to a combination of factors, including the aging of the population and increases in comorbid conditions associated with increased risk of hypogonadism such as obesity and diabetes.1 The evaluation and diagnosis of male hypogonadism are reviewed elsewhere.2 Here we will focus treatment using testosterone replacement therapy.

Benefits, Side Effects, and Risks

Among men with symptomatic hypogonadism, the potential clinical benefits of testosterone replacement therapy include increased libido, improved muscle strength, improved body composition (eg, decreased fat mass and increased lean mass), maintenance or improvement in bone mineral density, improved mood and cognition, improved erectile function, and maintenance or improvement in secondary sexual characteristics.2

The potential clinical benefits must be carefully weighed against potential risks for each patient. Potential adverse effects of testosterone replacement include erythrocytosis, increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and worsening of prostate disorders (eg, BPH symptoms), worsening of existing obstructive sleep apnea, and dermatologic effects such as acne and skin irritation.2 Testosterone replacement therapy is not appropriate for hypogonadal men who desire fertility because testosterone suppresses luteinizing hormone production and thus can reduce spermatogenesis by lowering intratesticular testosterone concentration.3

In addition, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently added a warning to all testosterone preparations regarding possible increased risk of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction and stroke in patients taking testosterone. Ongoing studies are attempting to better assess this risk. At this time, clinicians in practice should discuss this warning with all patients when starting or continuing testosterone treatment.4,5

Testosterone Preparations

There are a variety of testosterone preparations currently available in the United States (Table 1). The choice of preparation should be determined by the clinician in conversation with each individual patient and should take into consideration patient preference as well as cost and convenience. The most widely used testosterone preparations in the United States are transdermal and injectable preparations due to their ease of use (transdermal) and relatively low cost (injectable).

Table 1.

Testosterone preparations

Formulation Preparation (US Tradename) Dosage Forms Usual Dosinga Site of Application Advantages Disadvantages and Risks Approximate Cost per Monthb
Intramuscular
 Long-acting Testosterone cypionate (Depo-Testosterone) 100 mg/mL or 200 mg/mL 100–200 mg every 2 wk or 50–100 mg every 1 wk Thigh or buttock Home IM injection, infrequent treatment, low cost, high efficacy Peak effects or fluctuating testosterone levels, pain or irritation at injection site $15–60 (generic)
$50–70 (brand)
Testosterone enanthate (Delatestryl) 200 mg/mL $15–35 (generic)
$45–50 (brand)

 Extra–long-acting Testosterone undecanoate (Aveed) 250 mg/mL 750 mg initially, then 750 mg at 4 wk, then 750 mg every 10 wk ongoing Buttock Long-acting Administered in office or hospital by REMS-certified provider, risk of pulmonary oil microembolism and anaphylaxis $1050 (plus cost of injection)

Transdermal
 Gels Androgel (1% gel) 25 mg in 2.5 g packet OR
50 mg in 5 g packet
50–100 mg daily Dry intact skin or back, abdomen, upper thighs or arm Steady serum testosterone concentration Risk of transfer, requires daily application, may not achieve normal testosterone levels in all men, occasional skin irritation $175–400 (generic)
$500–525 (brand)
Testim (1% gel) 50 mg in 5 g packet $160–320 (generic)
$480–520 (brand)
Androgel (1.62% gel) 20.25 mg in 1.25 g packet
40.5 mg in 2.5 g packet
20.25 mg per actuation, metered-dose pump
20.25–81 mg daily $480–550 (brand only)
Fortesta (2% gel) 10 mg per actuation, metered-dose pump 10–70 mg daily Dry intact skin of front and inner thighs Ease of application, $160–400
Axiron (2% solution) 30 mg per actuation, metered-dose pump 30–120 mg daily Dry, intact skin of axilla Ease of application reduced risk for transfer $260–1200

 Patch Androderm 2 mg/24 h patch
4 mg/24 h patch
2–6 mg daily Dry intact skin of arm or torso Limited risk of transfer, no injection Skin irritation or rash (about 1/3 of men), daily application $475–510

Other
 Implanted Subcutaneous Pellet Testopel 75 mg pellets 150–450 mg every 3–6 mo Implanted into subcutaneous fat of buttock, lower abdominal wall or thigh No risk of transfer, no daily treatment Extrusion, infection, fibrosis at pellet sites
Placed in clinic or hospital by trained provider under sterile conditions
$150–175 (plus cost of pellet placement) cost estimate based on dose 150 mg mg every 3 mo

 Nasal Natesto 5.5 mg per actuation, metered-dose pump applicator 11 mg (2 pumps, 1 in each nostril) 3 times daily Intranasal Minimal risk of transfer Frequent administration, rhinorrhea, epistaxis, sinusitis, nasal scab $600–700

 Buccal Striant SR 30 mg buccal system 30 mg twice daily Adhere to No injection depression in the gingiva superior to upper incisors Frequent administration, gingival irritation $550–600

 Oral Generally not recommended

Abbreviations: IM, intramuscular; REMS, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy.

a

Usual doses are listed but dosing should be adjusted based on specific patient factors and clinician judgment.

b

Cost data based on average cost purchasing monthly supply, various suppliers as listed on goodrx.com at the time of publication and estimated costs at University of Washington Medical Center for facility administered testosterone undecanoate and Testopel.

Injectable preparations

Testosterone enanthate and testosterone cypionate are widely used long-acting injectable testosterone preparations.6,7 Both forms are administered as intramuscular (IM) injections and most patients are able to administer injections independently at home with the help of a partner. These preparations are highly effective in improving symptoms of hypogonadism and maintaining virilization. In addition, the long-acting preparation allows most men to administer IM injections every 2 weeks (instead of the daily application of a transdermal preparation). With long-acting IM preparations, testosterone concentration and clinical effects (eg, impacts on mood and libido) peak around 1 to 2 days after the injection and wane over the subsequent 2 weeks.8 For some patients, these fluctuations in testosterone effect are particularly bothersome. In these cases, alternate dosing of 100 mg every week or use of an alternate testosterone preparation may be preferred.

An extra–long-acting IM testosterone preparation, testosterone undecanoate, has also recently been approved for use in the United States. This preparation is administered as a deep IM injection at baseline, 4 weeks, and then every 10 weeks. This preparation reduces the frequency of IM injection. However, due to risk of pulmonary oil microembolism and anaphylaxis, the drug is only available through a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program and must be administered by a trained and registered care provider in an office or hospital setting. Thus, this formulation is not recommended unless patients are unable to tolerate or access other available preparations.

Transdermal preparations

There are several transdermal gels currently available in the United States, including Androgel, Testim, Fortesta, and Axiron. Gels are supplied in packets or tubes or in a metered-dose pump and are applied by hand to dry, intact skin on the arms, torso, or thighs. They should not be applied to the scrotum. Gels are generally well-tolerated. They offer the benefit of minimal fluctuation in testosterone concentration from day to day and may be preferable for patients who struggle with peak effects from IM injections. They are occasionally associated with mild skin irritation. Use of gels is limited by the potential for skin-to-skin transfer to others and patients should be instructed to limit this risk by carefully washing their hands after gel application and avoiding skin-to-skin contact with others (particularly female partners or children) on the gel-treated areas.9 Additionally, some men do not achieve normal testosterone concentrations due to poor absorption of topical applications and monitoring of serum testosterone concentration is important to confirm adequate dosing with these preparations.

One testosterone patch preparation (Androderm) is currently available in the United States. The patch reduces the risk of skin-to-skin transfer of testosterone and is preferable for some patients. However, up to one-third of men who use the patch may have significant rash or skin irritation preventing its ongoing use. Patches should not be applied to the scrotum. Monitoring of testosterone concentration is also important with transdermal patches because absorption can be variable similarly to gel preparations.

Other available preparations

One preparation of subcutaneous testosterone pellet is currently available (Testopel).10 Pellets are placed in the subcutaneous fat of the buttock, lower abdomen, or thigh every 3 to 6 months. Pellets are placed in sterile conditions in an office or hospital setting. They are associated with risks, including infection, fibrosis, and pellet extrusion. Benefits include avoiding skin-to-skin transfer, no need for self-injection, and infrequent dosing.

Nasal and buccal testosterone preparations are also available. These preparations are infrequently used due to limitations of nasal, sinus, or gingival irritation. In addition, there are limited published data on use of nasal preparation and animal studies suggest possible increases in central nervous system testosterone levels higher than that expected with other preparations.

Oral preparations of testosterone (eg, methyltestosterone) have been available for many years. However, use of these preparations for treatment of male hypogonadism is not recommended because of concerns about possible lack of efficacy in producing virilization, reports of hepatic toxicity with these drugs,11 and the wide availability of more preferred preparations.

Monitoring and Dose Adjustment

Patients on testosterone replacement therapy should be followed to assess improvement in hypogonadal symptoms and to achieve serum testosterone concentrations in the normal reference range. Among patients being treated with testosterone cypionate or enanthate IM injection every 2 weeks, the clinician should target testosterone levels in the middle to normal range (400–700 ng/dL) 1 week after the last injection.2 Generally, patients should be seen back approximately 3 months after starting or changing a testosterone dose for clinical assessment; testosterone serum concentration monitoring; if needed; and monitoring of hematocrit and PSA. Once on stable treatment, continued clinical and laboratory follow-up every 6 to 12 months is recommended.2

Various formulations of testosterone are available and choice of treatment formulation should be based on discussion of risks and benefits between the provider and each patient. Injectable and transdermal preparations of testosterone are the most widely used in clinical practice and are generally effective and well-tolerated. Alternative testosterone preparations, including subcutaneous testosterone pellets, buccal, and nasal preparations can be considered for patients in whom injectable or transdermal preparations are ineffective or poorly tolerated.

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION

Erectile Dysfunction

ED is defined as the inability to achieve and maintain an erection sufficient for intercourse. ED is a common complaint of sexually active men, with a lifetime prevalence of 70%.12 ED is commonly associated with systemic disorders such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, or harmful behaviors such as tobacco or drug use. Other factors that can cause ED include neurologic diseases, hypogonadism, mood disorders, and medications. In addition, the prevalence of ED increases significantly with age, such that most men in their 80s have ED and require treatment if they wish to remain sexually active.13 Fortunately, there are many efficacious therapies for the treatment of ED in men. Indeed, with current therapies, most men can be successfully treated for ED using 1 of the following therapies.

Approach to Erectile Dysfunction

Before an ED medication is prescribed, it is useful to review the patient’s symptoms, sexual frequency, and erectile function. In particular, low libido may be a sign of underlying hypogonadism, which would trigger a measurement of a morning serum total testosterone concentration and possible treatment with testosterone. In addition, several common medications can adversely affect sexual function, including antihypertensives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiandrogens (eg, spironolactone and cimetidine), and opiates. Often, ED can be improved by substitution of 1 of these medications for another that is less likely to interfere with erectile function. For example, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors commonly impair sexual function, both in terms of ED and anorgasmia. Alternative antidepressants, such as bupropion and venlafaxine are associated with a lower incidence of sexual side effects and may result in improvement in symptoms of ED.14

Other important historical clues include prior pelvic surgery or the rapid loss of an erection soon after the initiation of sexual activity, which might suggest either anxiety or a venous leak. On physical examination, evidence of neuropathy or testicular atrophy would suggest systemic disease such as diabetes or hypogonadism. Treating men with low serum testosterone concentrations is likely to improve libido and erectile function, as well as improve muscle and bone density, and is reasonable in patients with truly low serum testosterone. If these approaches to treatment do not result in satisfactory improvement in symptoms, it is reasonable to suggest specific treatment of ED with 1 of the following medications.

Oral Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Treatment of ED with as-needed oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (Table 2) is recommended as initial therapy for ED because these agents are relatively safe, easy to administer, and have a high likelihood of greatly improving symptoms of ED in most men. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors improve erectile function by increasing the production of nitric oxide in the corpora cavernosum, resulting in increased penile blood flow and improved erectile function. The 4 currently available phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors have some minor differences in terms of their half-life and dosing. In particular, tadalafil has the longest half-life and excellent bioavailability. Therefore, tadalafil can be dosed with food in contrast to sildenafil and vardenafil, which require dosing on an empty stomach 30 to 60 minutes before intercourse.15 Tadalafil can also be dosed daily at lower doses for men who do not respond to as-needed treatment with some improvement in overall efficacy.16

Table 2.

Medications for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Drug Name Tradename Dose Range Side Effects Notes
Oral
 Sildenafil Viagra 25–100 mg as needed Headaches, dyspepsia, hypotension, rhinitis, visual disturbance (ie, Viagra) Avoid coadministration with nitrates & alpha-antagonists
 Vardenafil Levitra 5–20 mg as needed Use with caution in liver & kidney dysfunction
 Tadalafil Cialis 10–20 mg as needed or 2.5–5 mg daily Avoid strong CYP3A4 inhibitors
 Avanafil Stendra 50–200 mg as needed

 Trazadone Desyrel 50–300 mg each night, orally Sedation, dizziness, weight gain, priapism Potential for QTc prolongation
Less potent than PDE-5 inhibitors

Intraurethral Pellet

 Alprostadil Muse 125–1000 mcg Vasodilatation, penile pain, priapism Can be used twice daily
Avoid in hematological disease

Intrapenile Injections

 Alprostadil Caverject, Edex 5–40 mcg Injection site pain, priapism Max use 3 times weekly, and once in 24 h
Avoid in anticoagulated patient

Abbreviations: PDE-5, phosphodiesterase type 5; QTc, corrected QT interval.

Oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors are contraindicated in men taking nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, because severe hypotension can develop. Similarly, caution should be exercised when combining these medications with alpha-adrenergic antagonists, especially older nonselective alpha-antagonists prescribed for the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia. Because of the potential for hypotension from the combination of alpha-adrenergic antagonists and oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors, it is frequently recommended that the initial dose of a phosphodiesterase inhibitor be reduced by half, then the dose increased slowly from there to the minimum required for an erection sufficient for intercourse. In addition, switching from a nonselective alpha antagonist, to an alpha1 selective antagonist (see later discussion) in men receiving both therapies is recommended.17 Common side effects of these medications include headaches, dyspepsia, diarrhea, epistaxis, and a blue tinge to vision (with sildenafil). In addition, all of these medications are metabolized by CYP3A4, so coadministration of any of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors with a CYP3A4 inhibitor results in increased drug concentrations, which could increase the risk of side effects such as hypotension.

Other Oral Medications for Erectile Dysfunction

The antidepressant trazadone has been reported to benefit some men with ED and is occasionally prescribed in men with mild depression and ED for a double effect. Side effects of this medication include dizziness, sedation, and weight gain. In addition, priapism has been rarely reported with this medication.18 Therefore, men should be counseled to seek medical attention for erections that last more than 4 hours while taking this medication. Finally, yohimbine is occasionally prescribed for ED in the setting of low libido in men with a normal testosterone, although the data supporting this indication are not strong19 and this medication is not currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of ED. Side effects with yohimbine are frequent and can include potentially serious increases in blood pressure and heart rate. Yohimbine is a common ingredient in nonprescription dietary supplements marketed for sexual potency, so eliciting a history of supplement use in patients with ED may reveal exposure to this drug.

Intraurethral and Intrapenile Alprostadil

Alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) is a direct vasodilator that relaxes vascular smooth muscle to increase blood flow in the penis and results in an erection sufficient for intercourse in most men. Alprostadil is available in both intraurethral forms (tradename Muse in the United States), and intrapenile injection (tradenames Edex and Caverject). Intraurethral alprostadil is introduced into the urethra by an applicator. The penis is then massaged to allow for absorption of the drug into the corpora cavernosum. With treatment, approximately two-thirds of men will experience an erection sufficient for intercourse.20 Side effects other than penile pain are uncommon. This medication should not be used in men with Peyronie disease, sickle cell anemia, or myeloproliferative disorders due to the risk of priapism.

Intrapenile alprostadil is appropriate for patients who can be trained to perform self-injections and is an especially good choice for those who perform these injections routinely (eg, diabetics using insulin). The sterile alprostadil solution is reconstituted immediately before use and injected into 1 penile corporeal body. Connected circulation between the 2 corpora then delivers the drug to the uninjected side, allowing for a symmetric erection that may last for more than an hour. Almost 90% of men who use intrapenile injections of alprostadil are satisfied with their erectile function with this technique; however, penile pain is a frequent complaint and may lead to discontinuation.21 Systemic anticoagulation is a contraindication to the use of these injections. Similarly, either form of alprostadil should not be used in men with a penile implant due to the risk of infecting the implant. Intrapenile alprostadil is occasionally combined with other drugs, such as phentolamine and papaverine, by compounding pharmacies; however, these preparations have not been rigorously tested and safety concerns exist regarding these combination therapies, such as penile nodules, hematoma formation (with papaverine), and hepatitis.22

Nonpharmacological Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

Patients who may not respond to pharmacologic therapies, may experience intolerable side effects, may have contraindications to therapy, or may prefer nonmedical therapy do have options for treating ED. Mechanical vacuum pumps can be used to generate an erection sufficient for intercourse, although the necessary occlusive ring placed at the base of the penis often interferes with ejaculation. Penile prostheses are a highly effective form of treated ED. These devices are usually reserved for men who have failed pharmacotherapy and have no contraindications to surgery. Patient satisfaction with these devices is high.

Oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors are initial pharmacotherapy for ED. Intraurethral or intrapenile alprostadil can be used for men who don’t have a satisfactory response to oral medications.

PHARMACOLOGIC TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

BPH is a common cause of morbidity in older men. Autopsy studies have shown that the prevalence of BPH starts increasing from 40% to 50% around age 50 to more than 80% older than age 80 years.23 Using history and digital rectal examinations, the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging also found similar clinical prevalence rates.24 Symptoms may include a variety of lower urinary tract symptoms, including urinary frequency, urgency, hesitancy, nocturia, and weak urinary stream. The severity of these symptoms can be variable with an insidious onset and slow progression. A meta-analysis of studies that followed untreated men with BPH for 2.6 to 5 years showed that 16% remained stable and 38% showed improvement in symptoms.25 Therefore, in most men, the decision to treat is based on how much they are affected by their symptoms. The American Urological Association symptoms index, or the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS),26 can be a useful tool to assess the severity of a patient’s symptoms and help identify men who may warrant therapy.

Medical Management

In men with mild-to-moderate symptoms (IPSS<19), monotherapy with alpha1-adrenergic antagonists can be the starting point. Men with more severe symptoms may need to start with combination therapy.

Alpha1-Adrenergic Antagonists

Alpha1-adrenergic antagonist drugs relax the smooth muscle in the bladder neck, prostate capsule, and prostatic urethra, countering the dynamic component of bladder outlet obstruction. There are 5 FDA-approved agents in the United States: terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin, and silodosin. When compared with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, these agents have a faster onset of therapeutic benefits (6–12 months vs 1–2 weeks) and are more effective at improving urinary symptoms in the short and long term.27 A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials and comparative studies among terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin showed these agents reduced IPSS scores by 30% to 40% and increased urinary flow rates by 16% to 25%.28 All the drugs were more effective than placebo and similar in efficacy to each other. Therefore, when choosing between them, cost, side-effect profile, and drug interactions should be determining factors in the decision. Common side effects of these medications include nasal congestion, dizziness, and headache. Table 3 summarizes the different approved agents with their side-effect profiles and costs. The nonuroselective agents, terazosin and doxazosin, need to be initiated at a lower dose and then titrated up over several weeks due to the side effect of hypotension. Taking these medications at bedtime also minimizes the postural lightheadedness that may be seen with initial doses.

Table 3.

Alpha1-adrenergic antagonists with their side-effect profiles and cost

Drug Uroselective Hypotension PDE-5i
Worsen
Hypotension
Ejaculatory
Dysfunction
Cost per Month
Terazosin No ↑↑↑ Yes No $48
Doxazosin No ↑↑↑ Yes No $118 (ER)
$43 (IR, generic)
$107 (IR, Cardura)
Tamsulosin Yes No Yes $126 (generic)
$226 (Flomax)
Alfuzosin Yes No No $126 (generic)
$690 (Uroxatral)
Silodosin Yes No Yes $227

Abbreviations: ER, extended release; IR, immediate release; PDE-5i, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors

5-Alpha-reductase inhibitor medications act by reducing the size of the prostate gland; therefore, therapeutic effects may not be seen until after 6 to 12 months of therapy. This is why these agents are more effective in men with larger prostates. In general, these agents can be used in men who desire medical therapy for BPH but are not able to tolerate alpha1-adrenergic antagonists or for combination therapy in men with severe symptoms (IPSS>20). There are 2 approved agents for use: finasteride and dutasteride. A study of 895 men with BPH treated with finasteride for a year noted increased maximal urinary flow rate, 19% decrease in mean prostate volume, and 23% lowering of obstructive and 18% lowering of nonobstructive symptom scores.29 A study of more than 3000 men has shown that these benefits are sustained for 4 years30 and 6 years.31 Additionally, finasteride therapy may halve the risk of needing prostate surgery and acute urinary retention compared with placebo.30 Dutasteride seems similar to finasteride on all fronts. A trial comparing finasteride and dutasteride therapy for 12 months showed no differences in reduction of prostate volume, improvement in urinary flow rates, urinary symptoms scores, or adverse-effect profiles.32 In addition, in patients with gross hematuria secondary to BPH or uncertain cause, finasteride has been shown to reduce the rate of recurrent hematuria as well as the need for surgery.33

Side effects of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors

  1. Prostate cancer risk: Two large, randomized controlled trials have shown that in men with BPH, although there is overall lower risk of prostate cancer with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor therapy, the risk of high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score>7) is increased.34,35 This has led to an FDA warning label to ensure men are evaluated for prostate cancer before initiation of therapy. A suggested approach is to perform digital rectal examinations and obtain PSA levels before starting the medication and monitoring these while on treatment. Because these agents can lower PSA by up to 50%, any increase in PSA on therapy warrants further evaluation.

  2. Sexual dysfunction: Commonly noted problems include decreased libido, ejaculatory dysfunction, and ED; however, these may only manifest in the first year of therapy.36

Anticholinergic Agents

Anticholinergic agents are useful in patients with predominantly irritative urinary symptoms (eg, frequency, urgency, incontinence) either as monotherapy or in combination with alpha1-adrenergic antagonists. Commonly used agents include tolterodine and oxybutynin. Other approved agents are darifenacin, solifenacin, fesoterodine, and trospium. Therapy comes with the side effects of peripheral anticholinergic action, including drowsiness, decreased cognitive function, blurry vision, dry mouth, tachycardia, and constipation.

Phosphodiesterase-5-Inhibitors

Tadalafil is the only approved agent in the phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor class for use in BPH in the United States. It is worth considering in men with symptomatic BPH and ED. It has been shown to improved urinary flow rate and urinary symptom scores.37,38

Herbal Therapies

There is no concrete evidence to support the efficacy of agents such as saw palmetto, beta-sitosterol, cernilton, and pygeum africanum. None of these agents are approved for the treatment of BPH in the United States.

The decision to treat men with BPH is based on severity of symptoms and their impact on a patient’s life. Alpha1-adrenergic antagonists are first-line therapy with comparable efficacy of the different agents. Their side-effect profiles and cost may be the determining factors for which agent is chosen for treatment. 5-Alpha-reductase inhibitors are useful in men with large prostates or those unable to tolerate alpha1-adrenergic antagonists.

KEY POINTS.

  • Injectable and transdermal preparations of testosterone are the most widely used in clinical practice. Alternative testosterone preparations, including subcutaneous pellets, buccal, and nasal preparations, can be considered for patients in whom injectable or transdermal preparations are ineffective or poorly tolerated.

  • Oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors are initial pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction. Intraurethral or intrapenile alprostadil can be used for men who do not have a satisfactory response to oral medications.

  • Alpha1-adrenergic antagonists are first-line therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. 5-Alpha-reductase inhibitors are useful in men with large prostate glands or those unable to tolerate alpha1-adrenergic antagonists.

Footnotes

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.Zarotsky V, Huang MY, Carman W, et al. Systematic literature review of the risk factors, comorbidities, and consequences of hypogonadism in men. Andrology. 2014;2(6):819–34. doi: 10.1111/andr.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2536–59. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men. World Health Organization Task Force on methods for the regulation of male fertility. Lancet. 1990;336(8721):955–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goodman N, Guay A, Dandona P, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Position Statement on the Association of Testosterone and Cardiovascular Risk. Endocr Pract. 2015;21(9):1066–73. doi: 10.4158/EP14434.PS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morgentaler A, Miner MM, Caliber M, et al. Testosterone therapy and cardiovascular risk: advances and controversies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(2):224–51. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Snyder PJ, Lawrence DA. Treatment of male hypogonadism with testosterone enanthate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(6):1335–9. doi: 10.1210/jcem-51-6-1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sih R, Morley JE, Kaiser FE, et al. Testosterone replacement in older hypogonadal men: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(6):1661–7. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.6.3988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schurmeyer T, Nieschlag E. Comparative pharmacokinetics of testosterone enanthate and testosterone cyclohexanecarboxylate as assessed by serum and salivary testosterone levels in normal men. Int J Androl. 1984;7(3):181–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1984.tb00775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Swerdloff RS, Wang C, Cunningham G, et al. Long-term pharmacokinetics of transdermal testosterone gel in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(12):4500–10. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.12.7045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCullough AR, Khera M, Goldstein I, et al. A multi-institutional observational study of testosterone levels after testosterone pellet (Testopel(®)) insertion. J Sex Med. 2012;9(2):594–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Westaby D, Ogle SJ, Paradinas FJ, et al. Liver damage from long-term methyltestosterone. Lancet. 1977;2(8032):262–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grant P, Jackson G, Baig I, et al. Erectile dysfunction in general medicine. Clin Med. 2013;13(2):136–40. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-2-136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shamloul R, Ghanem H. Erectile dysfunction. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):153–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60520-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Safarinejad MR. The effects of the adjunctive bupropion on male sexual dysfunction induced by a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: a double-blind placebo-controlled and randomized study. BJU Int. 2010;106(6):840–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Corbin JD, Francis SH. Pharmacology of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Int J Clin Pract. 2002;56(6):453–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shabsigh R, Seftel AD, Kim ED, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction who reported no successful intercourse attempts at baseline. J Sex Med. 2013;10(3):844–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02898.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miller MS. Role of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(2):278–83. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carson CC, 3rd, Mino RD. Priapism associated with trazodone therapy. J Urol. 1988;139(2):369–70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42419-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ernst E, Pittler MH. Yohimbine for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Urol. 1998;159(2):433–6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63942-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Padma-Nathan H, Hellstrom WJ, Kaiser FE, et al. Treatment of men with erectile dysfunction with transurethral alprostadil. Medicated Urethral System for Erection (MUSE) Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(1):1–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701023360101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Linet OI, Ogrinc FG. Efficacy and safety of intracavernosal alprostadil in men with erectile dysfunction. The Alprostadil Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(14):873–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604043341401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Levine SB, Althof SE, Turner LA, et al. Side effects of self-administration of intracavernous papaverine and phentolamine for the treatment of impotence. J Urol. 1989;141(1):54–7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40585-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, et al. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132(3):474–9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49698-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guess HA, Arrighi HM, Metter EJ, et al. Cumulative prevalence of prostatism matches the autopsy prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 1990;17(3):241–6. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990170308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Isaacs JT. Importance of the natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the evaluation of pharmacologic intervention. Prostate Suppl. 1990;3:1–7. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990170502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, Jr, O’Leary MP, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol. 1992;148(5):1549–57. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5. discussion: 1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tacklind J, Fink HA, Macdonald R, et al. Finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD006015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006015.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Djavan B, Marberger M. A meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):1–13. doi: 10.1159/000019919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gormley GJ, Stoner E, Bruskewitz RC, et al. The effect of finasteride in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Finasteride Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(17):1185–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199210223271701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, et al. The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(9):557–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802263380901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roehrborn CG, Bruskewitz R, Nickel JC, et al. Sustained decrease in incidence of acute urinary retention and surgery with finasteride for 6 years in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2004;171(3):1194–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000112918.74410.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nickel JC, Gilling P, Tammela TL, et al. Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS) BJU Int. 2011;108(3):388–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Foley SJ, Soloman LZ, Wedderburn AW, et al. A prospective study of the natural history of hematuria associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and the effect of finasteride. J Urol. 2000;163(2):496–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(3):215–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Brawley OW, et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1192–202. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wessells H, Roy J, Bannow J, et al. Incidence and severity of sexual adverse experiences in finasteride and placebo-treated men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2003;61(3):579–84. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02401-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oelke M, Giuliano F, Mirone V, et al. Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2012;61(5):917–25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Porst H, Oelke M, Goldfischer ER, et al. Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: subgroup analyses of pooled data from 4 multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies. Urology. 2013;82(3):667–73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES