Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves interaction between host genetic factors and environmental triggers. CCDC88B maps within one IBD risk locus on human chromosome 11q13. Here we show that CCDC88B protein increases in the colon during intestinal injury, concomitant with an influx of CCDC88B+lymphoid and myeloid cells. Loss of Ccdc88b protects against DSS-induced colitis, with fewer pathological lesions and reduced intestinal inflammation in Ccdc88b-deficient mice. In a T cell transfer model of colitis, Ccdc88b mutant CD4+ T cells do not induce colitis in immunocompromised hosts. Expression of human CCDC88B RNA and protein is higher in IBD patient colons than in control colon tissue. In human CD14+ myeloid cells, CCDC88B is regulated by cis-acting variants. In a cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease, CCDC88B expression correlates positively with disease risk. These findings suggest that CCDC88B has a critical function in colon inflammation and the pathogenesis of IBD.
Hook-related protein family member CCDC88b is encoded by a locus that has been associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Here the authors show that Ccdc88b inactivation in T cells prevents colitis in a transfer model, and detect high colonic levels of CCDC88b in patients with Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis, identifying that expression correlates with disease risk.
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are heterogeneous inflammatory diseases that affect the gastrointestinal tract. In Crohn’s disease (CD) the ileum and colon are primarily affected, whereas in ulcerative colitis (UC) only the distal colon is affected. Both genetic factors and environmental effects (life style, diet, intestinal flora) contribute to IBD pathogenesis. Genetic studies of patients with rare early onset and severe forms of IBD have uncovered >60 causative genes and associated mutations, and genome wide association studies (GWAS) have mapped >200 non-MHC linked loci that affect susceptibility to IBD1–4. However, the effect size and contribution to disease of individual GWAS loci is small; for many IBD loci the causative gene and mechanistic basis of the genetic effect are unknown.
In a forward genetic screen in mice, we identified that Ccdc88b is required for pathological and lethal neuroinflammation5. In mice, Ccdc88b mRNA transcripts are almost exclusively present in haematopoietic organs and the Ccdc88b protein is expressed in CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and myeloid cell subsets5. Ccdc88b mutant (Ccdc88b m1PGrs) T cells have impaired maturation in vivo, and reduced activation, cell division and cytokine production (IFNγ, TNF) in response to specific or non-specific stimuli in vitro5. CCDC88B belongs to the hook-related protein family (CCDC88A, CCDC88B, CCDC88C), which is defined by a conserved region similar to the microtubule binding domain of Hook proteins6. The function of these proteins is unclear, but they seem to functionally couple elements of the cytoskeleton with different cellular processes, such as vesicular transport and cell movement6. Ccdc88b has been shown to interact with the CDC42 guanine nucleotide exchange factor DOCK87. Human DOCK8 mutations cause primary immunodeficiencies associated with perturbed migration, altered function of myeloid and NK cells8,9. CCDC88B (HkRP3) is also required for NK cell cytotoxicity including production and mobilization of cytotoxic granules8.
Human CCDC88B maps to distal chromosome 11 (11q13) within a locus associated with susceptibility to several inflammatory conditions10, including sarcoidosis11, IBD1, psoriasis12, alopecia areata13, multiple sclerosis14 and primary biliary cirrhosis15. The 11q13 locus contains >23 genes in linkage disequilibrium on a 1 Mb segment, making it difficult to identify the gene underlying the pleiotropic effect of this locus on inflammatory diseases. Epigenetic annotation based on recruitment, and transcriptional activation by proinflammatory factors IRF1, IRF8, and STAT1 in response to exposure of myeloid cells to IFNγ (myeloid inflammation score)16, has been used to identify CCDC88B as the top “inflammatory” positional candidate at 11q135.
Here, we show that Ccdc88b+ lymphoid and myeloid cells are recruited to the site of inflammation in experimental colitis. Furthermore, Cccdc88b mutant mice are protected against DSS-induced colitis, and naive Ccdc88b mutant CD4+ T cells do not induce colitis in immunocompromised mice. In humans, CCDC88B mRNA and protein expression is increased in inflamed colons of patients with UC or CD. In human CD14+ cells, CCDC88B mRNA is regulated by cis-acting regulatory SNPs (that is, eQTL), and eQTL effects and disease risk are correlated, with increased CCDC88B expression associated with increased risk. Our study therefore identifies a critical function of CCDC88B in colonic inflammation and IBD.
Results
CCDC88B expression is induced during experimental colitis
The role of CCDC88B in intestinal homeostasis and in pathological inflammation was investigated in the dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) mouse model of intestinal colitis. We found that Ccdc88b mRNA levels gradually increased in the colon of DSS-treated wild-type (WT) mice at day 4 and day 8 following initiation of DSS treatment, when compared to untreated mice (Fig. 1a ). Likewise, Ccdc88b protein level was increased at day 4 and day 8 post-treatment whereas no Ccdc88b expression was detected in the colon of Ccdc88b mutant mice at day 8 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 7a). To investigate the tissue and cell types that express Ccdc88b in the colon during colitis, we performed immunohistochemistry and found Ccdc88b staining in a sub-population of cells that are also positive for the hematopoietic marker CD45 (Fig. 1c ). Interestingly, the rest of the E-cadherin positive intestinal mucosa and associated epithelium were negative for Ccdc88b (Fig. 1c ). Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis (FACS) of mononuclear cells isolated from colons show a significant increase of CD45+Ccdc88b+ cells at day 8 after DSS, confirming recruitment of Ccdc88b+ inflammatory cells (Fig. 1d). Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry studies show that Ccdc88b+ infiltrating cells belong to both the lymphoid (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+) and the myeloid (CD11b+) compartments (Fig. 1e,f). Further FACS analysis of infiltrating cells subsets identified increased recruitment of Ccdc88b+ T cells, NK cells, neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes and macrophages at both day 4 and day 8 post DSS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1). These findings indicate that during experimental colitis with DSS in mice, Ccdc88b+ lymphoid and myeloid cells are recruited to the site of inflammation.
Ccdc88b mutant mice are protected from experimental colitis
To directly assess whether CCDC88B plays a functional role in colitis, we subjected WT and Ccdc88b mutant (Ccdc88b mut) mice to 3% DSS for 5 days followed by water for 3 days and evaluated colitis incidence (Fig. 2). Ccdc88b mut mice showed significantly less body weight loss when compared to WT mice (Fig. 2a), and displayed significantly longer colons at day 8 post-treatment (Fig. 2b). Analysis of hematoxylin and eosin stained colon tissue sections revealed greater repair of the epithelial barrier and colonic crypts, thinner underlying muscle layer, and less abundant cellular infiltration in DSS-treated Ccdc88b mut mice compared to controls (Fig. 2c). Histopathological assessement of a number of cellular and tissue phenotypes associated with colitis were quantified at day 4 and day 8 post-DSS treatment and confirmed reduced pathology and protection against DSS-induced colitis in Ccdc88b mut mice (Fig. 2d). At both days 4 and 8, Ccdc88b mut mice had lower infiltration of inflammatory cells, and reduced overall pathology measured by submucosal edema, gland loss and surface erosion and ulceration when compared to WT (Fig. 2e). No such differences in tissue architecture and histology were seen in untreated mice of either genotype (Fig. 2c).
Chemokines, such as MCP-1 and RANTES play critical roles in recruitment of pro-inflammatory cells to the site of lesions in patients and in mouse models of IBD17–19. We evaluated mRNA expression for different pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in colons of DSS-treated mice at days 4 and 8. We found reduced expression of macrophage and neutrophil chemoattractants MCP1 and KC and of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL1β, TNF and IL6 mRNAs in colons from Ccdc88b mut mice compared to WT at day 4 after DSS treatment (Fig. 3a). Similar results were observed at day 8, with MCP1, TNF and RANTES being significantly lower in Ccdc88b mut mutants. The serum levels of MCP1 and KC, were also significantly decreased in Ccdc88b mut mice compared to WT at day 4, with this difference persisting at day 8 for KC (Fig. 3b). Compared to WT mice, the epithelium of treated Ccdc88b mut mice remained relatively intact with increased cell proliferation and greater number of mucin-containing epithelial goblet cells assesed by Ki-67 and Alcian blue (mucus) staining, respectively (Fig. 3c, d). Hence, Ccdc88b mut mice are protected against DSS-induced colitis, exhibiting less severe pathology and reduced inflammation.
Furthermore, we crossed Ccdc88b mut mice to Rag1 −/− mice and subjected these mice to an acute DSS treatment. We found that Rag1 −/− mice lacking functional Ccdc88b recovered from DSS-induced colitis (increased body weight, lower colonic damage, better total pathology scores) faster and more fully when compared to control Rag1 −/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 2). These results suggest that the absence of Ccdc88b in innate immune cells is sufficient to dampen epithelial barrier dammage, decrease inflammation and protect against experimental colitis.
Ccdc88b is required for T cell-induced colitis
We have previously shown that the Ccdc88b protein is expressed in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and is required for T cell maturation and activation5. We examined the effect of Ccdc88b mutation on the capacity of naïve CD4+ T cell (CD4+CD45RBhi cells, (Supplementary Fig. 3)) to induce colitis upon adaptive transfer into lymphopenic mice20. As previously reported20, Rag1 −/− mice receiving WT CD4+CD45RBhi cells developed symptoms of colitis including significant weight loss by week 6 post transfer (Fig. 4a). In contrast, Ccdc88b mut CD4+ T cells in Rag1 −/−mice failed to induce similar outcomes including weight loss and colon shortening (Fig. 4a, b). Histopathological assessment (Fig. 4c, d) of both groups of Rag1 −/− mice receiving either Ccdc88b mut or WT CD4+ T cells showed the former to display significantly less thickening of the mucosa, lower number and extent of cellular infiltration, number of abscesses and amount of glandular loss (Fig. 4d). The overall pathology score was significantly lower in Rag1 −/− mice receiving Ccdc88b mut vs. WT CD4+ T cells, demonstrating less severe colitis in the former group (Fig. 4e). Finally, the attenuated inflammation in Rag1 −/−mice receiving Ccdc88b mut CD4+ T cells was associated with lower staining of T cells than observed in mice receiving WT CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4f). Our results indicate that Ccdc88b is required for the induction of gut inflammation in the T cell transfer model of colitis.
CCDC88B expression by CD14+ cells correlates with IBD risk
Human CCDC88B maps to an IBD susceptibility locus on chromosome 11 (11q13)1. Analysis of published genetic association data in CD patients1 revealed significant disease association with SNPs from a 600 kb region overlapping CCDC88B association, with the top marker (rs641168; p = 2.1×10−6 using a logistic regression analysis) located 38.5Kb downstream CCDC88B transcription start site (Fig. 5a). Meta-analysis (combining GWAS and Immunochips datasets) showed a maximum association p value of 4.22 10−9 (top marker rs559928) at the CCDC88B locus1. Parallel analysis of CCDC88B mRNA expression in individual cell populations (CD4+, CD8+, CD14+, CD15+, CD19+) from PBMCs of 320 healthy individuals showed robust but variable CCDC88B mRNA expression in CD14+ and CD15+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 4a). eQTL analysis can be used to identify relevant variant:gene pairing among potential combinations of SNPs mapped by GWAS and the adjacent genes21. Because genotype information was available for these individuals, we analyzed the possible effect of 11q13 SNPs near CCDC88B on expression of the gene in these PBMC cell populations. We noted an effect of several SNPs in this region on CCDC88B mRNA expression in CD14+ cells, with the top marker (rs146881600; p = 0.0016) mapping at 6Kb from rs641168 and 32 Kb from CCDC88B (Fig. 5b). If the genetic associations observed for this chromosomal region with CD on the one hand and CCDC88B expression on the other hand are causally related, one predicts that the corresponding association patterns (i.e. the log(1/p) values for all SNPs in the region for CD and CCDC88B expression, respectively) may be similar. Thus, we investigated a possible correlation between the strength of the cis-acting eQTLs effect on CCDC88B expression in CD14+ cells, and strength of the association of the same SNPs with disease in our cohort of CD patients (Fig. 5c) (Equation 1, Methods). This analysis identifies a significant correlation (accounting for LD in the region) between eQTLs effects on CCDC88B expression and association (in GWAS dataset) with CD disease risk (p > 0.01), with increased CCDC88B expression associated with increased risk (Fig. 5c). A similar analysis performed for CD4+, CD8+, CD15+ and CD19+ cell subsets failed to identify such a correlation between eQTL effects on CCDC88B mRNA expression in these cell subsets and association with CD risk (in GWAS datasets) (Supplementary Fig. 4b). These results strongly suggest that differences in the level of expression of CCDC88B expression (eQTL) in CD14+ cells are associated with variable risk of IBD.
CCDC88B is increased in colons from IBD patients
We further evaluated CCDC88B mRNA and protein levels in colon surgical specimens obtained from UC patients (UC; n = 46) and CD patients (CD; n = 11), and from normal controls, consisting of non-inflamed areas of the colon of patients with colorectal cancer or diverticulitis (n = 73). We found a higher expression of CCDC88B mRNA in the colon of patients with IBD in both CD and UC in comparison with non-inflamed mucosa (Fig. 6a). By immunoblotting, using a specific antibody against human CCDC88B (Supplementary Fig. 5) in a subset of colon surgical specimens, we found CCDC88B protein significantly increased in inflamed colons of CD and UC patients compared to non-inflamed controls (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 7b). We also quantified expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8 in a subset of clinical specimens consisting of 69 controls, 7 CD and 38 UC samples; we deetcted increased IL-8 expression in specimens from CD and UC patients compared to NL controls (Fig. 6c).
We used immunohistochemistry to examine the site of CCDC88B protein expression in inflammaed mucosa from IBD patients. First, to confirm the inflamed nature of the tissue samples used in our experiments, blind histological scoring was performed on H&E sections. Apparent chronic inflammation and active inflammation were observed in the colon mucosa of UC and CD patients (Supplementary Fig. 6a), and was paralleled with increased presence of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 6b). CCDC88B expression in inflamed mucosa was limited to non-epithelial cells in the lamina propria, and colocalised with CD4+ and CD68+ infiltrating immune cells (Fig. 6d, e). These CCDC88B+ cells were found in greater numbers in the mucosa from patients with CD and UC compared to non-inflamed controls (Fig. 6d, e). Hence, our data show that human CCDC88B is highly expressed in colon lamina propria cells of inflammed mucosa from UC and CD patients, with its expression limited to infiltrating lymphoid and myeloid cells.
Discussion
We have previously shown that a mutation in Ccdc88b protects mice against lethal neuroinflammation in models of microbial disease5. In these studies, the loss of Ccdc88b did not affect the number of lymphoid and myeloid cells, but it impacted the maturation, and activation of these cells including production of pro-inflammatory cytokines5. Here we show that a mutation in Ccdc88b protects mice against experimental intestinal colitis, both in the DSS-colitis and CD4 T cells transfer models. Studies of the mouse model of colitis have clearly shown that reduced inflammation in situ decreases pathogenesis22. In these models, it has been reported that secretion of of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-9, and TNF drives pathogenesis22–25. In the absence of Ccdc88b, we found that the protection is associated with reduced recruitment of hematopoietic cells to the site of inflammation, concomitant to reduced local and systemic production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In the CD4 T cell transfer model20, absence of Ccdc88b expression in CD45RBhi CD4 T cells is associated with protection against intestinal inflammation.
Leukocytes trafficking and recruitment into the inflamed intestine is fundamental to the development of IBD, including functional interaction between the α4β7integrin expressing T cells and MAdCAM-1+ gut endothelial cells26–29. How does CCDC88B may regulate immune cells function during intestinal inflammation? An interesting clue comes from a recent report documenting physical interaction between CCDC88B (HkRP3) and the CDC42 guanine nucleotide exchange factor DOCK 87. DOCK8 mutations cause primary immunodeficiencies that clinically manifest as severe allergy, skin and lung infections in humans8,9. DOCK8 has been shown to be essential for the homing and function of myeloid (dendritic cells) and NK cells8,9. In addition, CCDC88B (HkRP3) is required for NK cells cytotoxicity and anti-tumor activity in general, and for the production and mobilization of cytotoxic granules in these cells7. It is tempting to speculate that CCDC88B may regulate migratory properties of myeloid and lymphoid cells during intestinal inflammation.
We also show that human CCDC88B mRNA and protein are increased in colon specimens from IBD patients, and linked to presence of CCDC88B+ cells in these tissues. In agreement with previously published results30, we observe that (a) CCDC88B is genetically linked to susceptibility to IBD, and (b) establish that the level of CCDC88B mRNA in normal CD14+ but not to other cells subsets is regulated by cis-acting variants (eSNPs), (c) detect a significant correlation between eQTLs effects and disease risk, with increased CCDC88B expression associated with increased risk and (d) observe that CCDC88B+myeloid and lymphoid cell subsets infiltrate the lamina propria of CD and UC patients. The specificity of the eQTL effect on CCDC88B mRNA expression in human CD14+ myeloid cells and its association with IBD disease risk may seem in apparent contrast to the results obtained in the RAG/lymphocyte deficient reconstitution model and that support a role of CCDC88b in T cells function in this mouse model of intestinal inflammation. We believe this points to a key role of CCDC88B in both lymphoid and myeloid cells, with the former being critical in this mouse model of inflammation, while the latter is possibly more relevant to the human disease and the criteria used to establish diagnosis. Indeed, we have previously demonstrated a role for CCDC88B in the function of both T cells and myeloid cells in other mouse models of inflammation (neuroinflammation)5.
Our results are compatible with a model in which CCDC88B is a microtubule associated protein which physically and functionally interacts with DOCK8, a protein required for mobility and homing of lymphoid and myeloid cells. We propose that genetically regulated levels of CCDC88B in immune cells may impact the recruitment of these cells to the site of tissue injury, causing variable inflammatory response in situ, and variable disease pathogenesis. This model is consistent with the pleiotropic effect of Ccdc88b mutation in different experimental models of inflammation in mice, and the association of the 11q13 locus with several inflammatory diseases in humans.
Methods
Ethics statement
All experiments with live mice conducted in this study were performed in accordance and compliance with the guidelines and regulations of the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). All protocols were approved by the Animal Care Committee of McGill University (protocol number 5287; Principal Investigator: P. Gros). Mice were anesthetized, and euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation, and every effort was made to minimize animal suffering. Sample size to achieve adequate power was chosen on the basis of previous studies with similar methods20,31,32. Briefly, a minimum of 3 mice for control animals and between 4 to 7 mice (per experiment) were used for treated animals. We randomized mice from different cages and different time points to exclude cage or batch variation. Experiments were not performed in a blinded fashion except when specifically indicated. Experiments and data analysis was performed without exclusion criteria, and all data was retained.
For isolation of human PBMC, informed consent was obtained from all donors and approved by the governing ethics committee (Comité d’ethique hospital-facultaire universitaire de Liège; Protocol B70720097536; 2009/256; Principal Investigator: Prof. E. Louis). For clinical specimens, only disposed de-identified segments of surgical specimens from patients undergoing bowel resection as part of their medical care for ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease or colorectal cancer/diverticulitis (controls)at the Mount Sinai Medical Center had been used in this study. The obtained specimens were pathological waste and used for research purposes only. Surgical wastes were completely anonymous and patient’s identifiers had never been communicated to the research team in order to strictly maintain patient’s confidentiality. Once unidentified specimens arrived in the laboratory, they were given lab accession numbers, which were not linked to any of the patient identifiers directly or indirectly. Because of the above process, the institutional review board at the Mount Sinai Medical Center considered this study as being “none human subject” research which fell under the waiver of the Consent Process. As a result, consent forms were not required for this study.
Mice
Wild type C57BL/6 J, Ccdc88b m1PGrs (Ccdc88b mut)5 and Rag1 −/− (RAG) mutant male mice (on B6 background), 8 to 10 weeks of age were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the animal care facility of the Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University. The animal studies were conducted under protocols approved by the McGill Institutional Review Board (protocol number 5287), and following guidelines and regulations of the Canadian Council of Animal Care.
Mouse models of intestinal colitis
To induce colitis mice (8 weeks old, male) were fed 3% (w/v) DSS (dextran sodium sulfate; molecular mass 36–40 kDa; MP Biomedicals) in the drinking water for 5 days. This was followed by normal drinking water until day 8, at which point animals were sacrificed. Mice were co-housed at weaning until the start of the experiment. The animals were weighed daily and monitored for signs of distress. For T cell transfer-induced colitis, naive CD4+ CD45RBhi T cells from WT or Ccdc88b mut mice were enriched (CD4+T Cell Isolation Kit; Miltenyi Biotec) and single-cell suspensions were stained with antibody dilutions 1:300 FITC-anti-CD4 (GK1.5), 1:250 PE-anti-CD25 (PC61.5) and 1:1500 APC–anti-CD45RB (C363.16 A), all from eBioscience33, following purification (>99%) by cell sorting (FACSAriaII). Sex-matched Rag1 −/− recipient mice received 5 × 105 CD4+ CD45RBhi T cells by intravenous (i.v.) injection. Mice were sacrificed when symptoms of clinical disease (significant weight loss) became apparent in control mice receiving WT cells, ~7 weeks after injection.
Lamina propria cell preparation and flow cytometry analysis
Colons were collected from control and DSS-treated mice and tissues were dissociated with Lamina Propria Dissociation Kit, (Miltenyi Biotec), according to the manufacturer instructions. Single-cell suspensions were prepared and cells were first stained with vital dye Zombie Aqua™ dye (at 1/400 dilution) (Biolegend) then surface stained with the following fluorescently-labeled antibodies: 1:300 PerCP-Cy5.5-Ly6G (1A8), 1:200 PE-Dazzle 594-CD3 (17A2), 1:100 BV421-Ly6C (HK1.4) all from Biolengend, 1:300 PE-Cy7-CD4 (GK1.5), 1:200 APC-NK1.1 (PK136), 1:200 Alexa 700-CD8 (53–6.7), 1:300 Evolve 605-CD11b (M1/70) and 1:300 APC-Efluor-780-CD45 (30-F1) all from eBiosicense. After permeabilization, cells were stained with rabbit anti-mouse Ccdc88B and anti-rabbit Alexa 488. Stained samples were analayzed on a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) and the results analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
Anti-human CCDC88B antibody production and purification
Polyclonal rabbit anti-human CCDC88B antiserum was prepared as we have previously described5,34. A recombinant protein consisting of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fused in-frame to a CCDC88B segment corresponding to human amino acid positions 650 to 769, was expressed in E. coli BL21, followed by affinity purification with glutathione-agarose beads (GE Healthcare). Antisera were raised in New Zealand white rabbits using purified protein (0.5 mg per rabbit per injection) emulsified in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant. Affinity purification of the anti-CCDC88B antibody35 was using a recombinant CCDC88B protein (positions 650 to 769) comprising a poly-histidine tail (His)6 fused in-frame at its N terminus, and purified by chromatography onto Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen). The immobilized protein was used to capture the anti-CCDC88B fraction of the hyperimmune serum, which was then released by washing with imidazole-containing buffer34. The specificity of the anti-CCDC88B antibody was tested by western blotting total cell extracts from HEK293T control cells and HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL-11268) stably expressing a full-length human CCDC88B.
Immunoblotting
Tissue homogenates were prepared in lysis buffer solution (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM EDTA, 1.5 mM EGTA and 1% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with a cocktail of protease inhibitors; 50 mM NaF, 10 mM of Na4P2O7;1 mM Na3VO4 in addition to 1X of protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche) using a Polytron Homogenizer (Kinematica AG). Samples were clarified, denatured with SDS buffer, and boiled for 5 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred on Immobilon®-P PVDF Membrane (Millipore). The membranes were immunoblotted with primary rabbit anti-mouse or rabbit anti-human CCDC88B antibodies followed by detection with anti-rabbit antibodies.
Immunohistochemistry
For Ki-67 staining, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were de-waxed and rehydrated, incubated in Diva Decloaker antigen retrieval solution (Biocare) and boiled for 20 min in a pressure cooker. Peroxidase activity was blocked using the Enzyme Block for 15 min (DAKO). Slides were stained with 1:400 anti-Ki-67 (D3B5; Cell signaling) for 1 h followed by another hour of incubation with 1:500 of goat anti-rabbit (Jackson laboratories). Finally, slides were incubated with DAKO DAB substrate (DAKO) for 10 min and counter-stained with hematoxilin, then mounted. For Alcian Blue staining (1% solution, Sigma), slides were stained at room temperature for 30 min and then washed. Cell nuclei were stained with Kernchtrot Nuclear Fast Red stain (1 min). Slides were washed with distilled water, dehydrated with anhydrous alcohol and mounted.
Immunofluorescence
Tissues for cryopreservation were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 6 h, incubated in 20% sucrose overnight, and frozen in Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) medium (VWR International). For immunofluorescence, frozen sections (7 µm) were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), incubated in blocking buffer (10% BSA, 0.4% Triton-X-100 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibody in primary antibody solution (1% BSA, 0.4% Triton-X-100) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies and dilutions used were as follows: 1:200 rabbit antiCcdc88b5, 1:100 rat anti-CD3ε-FITC (145-2C11, BioLegend), 1:100 rat anti-CD11b-APC (M1/70, eBioScience), 1:100 rat anti-CD4-FITC (GK1.5, BioLegend) 1:100 rat anti-CD8-FITC (53–6.7), BioLegend) 1:100 rat anti-E-Cadherin-660 (DECMA-1, eBioScience), 1:100 rat α-CD45-PE (30-F11, eBioScience). Bound antibodies were detected using a 1:1000 dilution of rabbit anti-Cy3, or AlexaFluor488. Immunostained sections were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a 1:3000 or Hoechst at 1:5000 to visualize the nuclei. Images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM710 Meta Laser Scanning Confocal microscope or Axioscope 2 plus, processed with ImageJ, and compiled with Adobe Illustrator. Paraffin-embedded sections of NL, CD and UC specimens were heat treated in citrate buffer (pH 6) for 10 min at 121 °C for antigen retrieval. The section were blocked with 10% normal human serum in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were stained with a combination of 1:100 rabbit anti-hCCDC88B and 1:150 mouse anti-CD68 (KP1, Abcam) or mouse 1:100 anti-CD4 (N1UG0, Affimetrix) to assess colocalization or 1:150 rabbit anti-CD3 (SP7, Abcam) and rabbit anti-CD8 (NBP2-29475, Novus Biologicals). Bound antibodies were revealed using a dilution of 1:500 of mouse anti-AlxaFluor 488 or rabbit anti-AlxaFluor 647 and counterstained with DAPI. Images were aquiered using Olympus VS110 systems and analyzed and processed with Olyvia software (Olympus).
Gene expression and cytokine quantitation in colon tissues
RNA was purified using a FastPrep 24 homogenizer (MP Biomedicals) with lysing matrix D beads (MP Biomedicals) and RNAeasy kits (QIAGEN). RNA purity and quantification was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies). cDNA synthesis was performed using a MMLV reverse transcriptase with a cocktail of Oligo dT and random hexamers (Invitrogen). Human and mouse Ccdc88b mRNA expression were quantified using the following primer sets, mCcdc88b (5′-CCGGGAGCTTCGAGGCCAAC-3′ and 5′-CCTATCTGGCAAGCGGGGC-3′) and h-CCDC88B (5′-GCGTGAGGGGTCCAGGC-3′ and 5′-CTCCTTGCCCCGCACCAC-3′). Cytokines and chemokines were quantified by RT-qPCR using Perfecta SYBR Green PCR kit and the specific primers sets mMCP-1/CCL2 (5′-AGGTGTCCCAAAGAAGCTGTA-3′ and 5′-TCTGGACCCATTCCTTCTTG-3′), KC/ CXCL1 (5′-CACCTCAAGAACATCCAGAGC-3′ and 5′-CTTGAGTGTGGCTATGACTTCG-3′), mIL1-β (5′-CGGCACACCCACCCTG-3′, and 5′- AAACCGCTTTTCCATCTTCTTCT-3′) mTNF- (5′-TCTCAGCCTCTTCTCATTCC-3′ and 5′-AGAACTGATGAGAGGGAGGC-3′), mIL-6 (5′-GAAGTAGGGAAGGCCGTGG-3′ and 5′-GAAGTAGGGAAGGCCGTGG-3′), mRantes/ CCL5 (5′-GCAAGTGCTCCAATCTTGCA-3′ and 5′-CTTCTCTGGGTTGGCACACA-3′), hIL-8 (5′-CTGGCCGTGGCTCTCTTG-3′) and (5′CTTGGCAAAACTGCACCTTCA-3′). Gene expression was normalized to hL32 expression (5′-TGTCCTGAATGTGGTCACCTGA-3′ and 5′-CTGCAGTCTCCTTGCACACCT-3′) and mHprt (5′-TCAGTCAACGGGGGACATAAA-3′ and 5′-GGGGCTGTACTGCTTAACCAG-3′) and relative expressions calculated using the ΔΔCT method. Serum was prepared from blood of DSS-treated animals. MCP-1/CCL2 and KC/CXCL1 chemokine were quantified by ELISA (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Assessment of intestinal inflammation
At experimental endpoints, the entire colons were excised, and their length measured. Colons were fixed overnight in 10% PFA, embedded in paraffin, and 4 μm sections were stained with hematoxylin & eosin. Histology was evaluated blindly by a pathologist to avoid bias. For DSS-induced colitis, histology was scored from 0 to 4 for a combination of inflammatory cell infiltration, surface epithelial erosion / ulceration, and gland loss for a total score of 24. For the transfer of naive CD4+T cells, histology was scored from 0 to 4 for the following criteria; inflammatory cell infiltration, inflammatory cell depth, submucosal edema, increased mucosal thickening, surface epithelial degeneration, gland epithelial apoptosis, gland epithelial degeneration/abscesses, gland goblet/enterocyte ratio decrease, submucosal edema and gland loss for a total score of 36 (detailed pathology scoring in Supplementary Table 1).
Clinical specimens
Disposed anonymous surgical specimens from patients undergoing bowel resection for Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis or colorectal cancer/diverticulitis (controls) at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were acquired as previousely published36,37. Both inflamed CD or UC, and non-inflamed controls were used. RNA was extracted from frozen colonic specimens corresponding to active Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) mucosal tissue along with adjacent normal tissue (Adj, >10 cm from the lesion) from the same patients.
Expression-QTL analyses and data
EDTA-treated blood from 320 individuals were layered on Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare) for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by density gradient centrifugation. CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, CD14+, and CD15+ cells were isolated using MicroBead Technology (Miltenyi Biotec). Total RNA was isolated using the AllPrep Micro Kit on a QIAcube robot (Qiagen). Whole genome expression data were generated for each of the cell/tissue types on Illumina Human HT-12 Expression BeadChips. 8,537 out of 47,231 probes mapping to multiple locations or encompassing known SNPs with MAF ≥0.05 were eliminated from further analyses. Raw fluorescent intensities were variance stabilized38 and quantile normalized39 using lumi R package40. Normalized expression data were corrected for Sentrix ID (random effect), age, sex, smoking status, and number of probes exceeding the detection limit (fixed effects and covariates, if significant (p ≤ 0.05) using a mixed model implemented with lme4 R package. eQTL analyses were performed using PLINK.
Genetic association between CD and CCDC88B expression
The correlation between the genetic association with gene expression level and disease assumes that; (a) genetic variant(s) in a given chromosome region affect the levels of expression of gene(s) in that region and that this affects predisposition to a given disease (CD in this study), one can predict that the corresponding association patterns (i.e. the set of log(1/p) values of association for the SNPs in the region with CD and gene expression, respectively) will be positively correlated. Such positive correlation can correspond to two distinct scenarios: increased gene expression may either be associated with increased or decreased disease risk. This information can be captured by calculating the correlation between log(1/p) values multiplied by the sign of the corresponding genetic effects (β). To avoid that the ensuing metric would be sensitive to the choice of the reference allele, we duplicate each data point in the correlation analysis, respectively considering the two alleles as reference in the association analysis. In summary, we generate a correlation metric, D(isease)E(xpression)C(orrelation), corresponding to:
1 |
Pen is a penalty function that measures the strength of the positive correlation between the log(1/p) values for the disease and eQTL associations respectively. Pen is defined as:
2 |
σ(x,y) corresponds to Spearman’s rank correlation between the log(1/p) values of associations with disease and gene expression for the SNPs in the region, and k1 and k2 to constants that determine the severity of the penalty, and which were empirically set at 30 and 0.3, respectively, in this study. We restrict the analysis to “informative” SNPs that have a log(1/p) value >1.2 for either the disease, or the eQTL or both. SC(x,y) stands for “signed correlation”. It corresponds to Spearman’s rank correlation between two pairs of sign_β*log(1/p) values for each SNP in the studied region. The first pair corresponds to the log(1/p) values multiplied by the sign of the effect of the association on disease and gene expression, respectively, assuming allele 1 as reference. The second pair is identical but assumes allele 2 as reference. We restrict the analysis to “informative” SNPs that have a log(1/p) value >1.2 for either the disease, or the eQTL or both.
To measure the statistical significance of the observed DEC, yet accounting for the LD structure of the studied region, we generated as many eQTL as there are SNPs in the studied region in silico. The in silico eQTL are simulated such that they explain the same variance as the true eQTL. For each simulated eQTL with compute a corresponding “simulated DEC”. The statistical significance of the actual DEC is then measured as the number of simulated DEC that are as large or larger than the true DEC. The log(1/p) values for CD were directly obtained from1. The log(1/p) values for the eQTL were obtained from the dataset described above.
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as mean±SEM. Prism5 (GraphPad) software was used for all statistical tests. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test for comparison of two groups and Mann–Whitney test for intestinal scoring41, unless otherwise indicated. Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05. P-values are indicated by *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article, its Supplementary Information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by research grants to PG from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; grants from WELBIO (Grant CAUSIBD) and from BELSPO (PAI BeMGI) for M.G., E.T., Y.M., J.D. and E.D. Work in the Shoukry lab was supported by pilot project funding from Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Santé (FRQS) AIDS and Infectious Disease Network (Réseau SIDA-MI) and the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C (CanHepC). MFM received fellowships from the Université de Montréal, Bourse Gabriel Marquis and the FRQS. NHS is supported by a Chercheur Boursier salary award from the FRQS. G.Y.’s work at Mount Sinai was supported by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. We thank Dr. Petronela Ancuta (Universite de Montreal) for sharing reagents. We thank Maryse Dagenais, Alexandre Morizot, and Claudia Champagne (McGill University) for technical help. The authors are indebted to Genevieve Perreault for expert technical assistance. S.D. is currently is employed by Sobi, Inc.; the article in no way represents the work product, views or opinions of Sobi, Inc. G.Y. is currently employed by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; the article in no way represents the work, views or opinions of Helmsley.
Author contributions
N.F., N.M. and G.Y., performed western blots, N.F., V.L, M.F.M. and N.H.S., performed IHC experiments, N.F., J.-F.O. and I.R., performed DSS and Flow cytometry experiments, N.F., T.J., A.M., D.B. and G.Y., performed RT-qPCR experiments, R.C. performed histological scoring, N.F. performed CD4+ T cell transfer experiments, M.K., J.D., E.L., E.T., Y.M. and M.G., performed eQTL analysis and genetic studies, S.D. G.Y., provided tissue samples, N.F., M.G., G.Y. and P.G. prepared the manuscript, N.F. and P.G. designed the experiments, conceived and directed the research.
Competing financial interests:
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01381-y.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Nassima Fodil, Email: nassima.fodil@mcgill.ca.
Philippe Gros, Email: philippe.gros@mcgill.ca.
References
- 1.Jostins, L. et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature491, 119-124 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Liu JZ, et al. Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:979–986. doi: 10.1038/ng.3359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015;12:720–727. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fodil N, Langlais D, Gros P. Primary Immunodeficiencies and Inflammatory Disease: A Growing Genetic Intersection. Trends Immunol. 2016;37:126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kennedy JM, et al. CCDC88B is a novel regulator of maturation and effector functions of T cells during pathological inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2014;211:2519–2535. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Le-Niculescu H, Niesman I, Fischer T, DeVries L, Farquhar MG. Identification and characterization of GIV, a novel Galpha i/s-interacting protein found on COPI, endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi transport vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:22012–22020. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501833200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ham H, Huynh W, Schoon RA, Vale RD, Billadeau DD. HkRP3 is a microtubule-binding protein regulating lytic granule clustering and NK cell killing. J. Immunol. 2015;194:3984–3996. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harada Y, et al. DOCK8 is a Cdc42 activator critical for interstitial dendritic cell migration during immune responses. Blood. 2012;119:4451–4461. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-407098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krishnaswamy JK, et al. Coincidental loss of DOCK8 function in NLRP10-deficient and C3H/HeJ mice results in defective dendritic cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:3056–3061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501554112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ellinghaus D, et al. Analysis of five chronic inflammatory diseases identifies 27 new associations and highlights disease-specific patterns at shared loci. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:510–518. doi: 10.1038/ng.3528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fischer A, et al. A novel sarcoidosis risk locus for Europeans on chromosome 11q13.1. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 2012;186:877–885. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201204-0708OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsoi LC, et al. Identification of 15 new psoriasis susceptibility loci highlights the role of innate immunity. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:1341–1348. doi: 10.1038/ng.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Petukhova L, et al. Genome-wide association study in alopecia areata implicates both innate and adaptive immunity. Nature. 2010;466:113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature09114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics C, et al. Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet. 45, 1353–1360 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Juran BD, et al. Immunochip analyses identify a novel risk locus for primary biliary cirrhosis at 13q14, multiple independent associations at four established risk loci and epistasis between 1p31 and 7q32 risk variants. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21:5209–5221. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Langlais D, Barreiro LB, Gros P. The macrophage IRF8/IRF1 regulome is required for protection against infections and is associated with chronic inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:585–603. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mazzucchelli L, et al. Differential in situ expression of the genes encoding the chemokines MCP-1 and RANTES in human inflammatory bowel disease. J. Pathol. 1996;178:201–206. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199602)178:2<201::AID-PATH440>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ajuebor MN, Hogaboam CM, Kunkel SL, Proudfoot AE, Wallace JL. The chemokine RANTES is a crucial mediator of the progression from acute to chronic colitis in the rat. J. Immunol. 2001;166:552–558. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu C, Zhang S, Wang Y, Zhang S, Luo L, Thorlacius H. Platelet-Derived CCL5 Regulates CXC Chemokine Formation and Neutrophil Recruitment in Acute Experimental Colitis. J. Cell Physiol. 2016;231:370–376. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Powrie F, Leach MW, Mauze S, Caddle LB, Coffman RL. Phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+T cells induce or protect from chronic intestinal inflammation in C. B-17 scid mice. Int. Immunol. 1993;5:1461–1471. doi: 10.1093/intimm/5.11.1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nica AC, et al. Candidate causal regulatory effects by integration of expression QTLs with complex trait genetic associations. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:329–342. doi: 10.1038/nri3661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Egger B, Bajaj-Elliott M, MacDonald TT, Inglin R, Eysselein VE, Buchler MW. Characterisation of acute murine dextran sodium sulphate colitis: cytokine profile and dose dependency. Digestion. 2000;62:240–248. doi: 10.1159/000007822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gerlach K, et al. TH9 cells that express the transcription factor PU.1 drive T cell-mediated colitis via IL-9 receptor signaling in intestinal epithelial cells. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:676–686. doi: 10.1038/ni.2920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ten Hove T, et al. Blockade of endogenous IL-18 ameliorates TNBS-induced colitis by decreasing local TNF-alpha production in mice. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1372–1379. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brazil JC, Louis NA, Parkos CA. The role of polymorphonuclear leukocyte trafficking in the perpetuation of inflammation during inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013;19:1556–1565. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318281f54e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nourshargh S, Hordijk PL, Sixt M. Breaching multiple barriers: leukocyte motility through venular walls and the interstitium. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;11:366–378. doi: 10.1038/nrm2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gorfu G, Rivera-Nieves J, Ley K. Role of beta7 integrins in intestinal lymphocyte homing and retention. Curr. Mol. Med. 2009;9:836–850. doi: 10.2174/156652409789105525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sydora BC, et al. beta7 Integrin expression is not required for the localization of T cells to the intestine and colitis pathogenesis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2002;129:35–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01892.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Narahara M, et al. Large-scale East-Asian eQTL mapping reveals novel candidate genes for LD mapping and the genomic landscape of transcriptional effects of sequence variants. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chassaing, B., Aitken, J. D., Malleshappa, M. & Vijay-Kumar, M. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 104, Unit 15 25 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Manicassamy S, Manoharan I. Mouse models of acute and chronic colitis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1194:437–448. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1215-5_25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Read S, Malmstrom V, Powrie F. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2000;192:295–302. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.2.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Canonne-Hergaux F, Gruenheid S, Ponka P, Gros P. Cellular and subcellular localization of the Nramp2 iron transporter in the intestinal brush border and regulation by dietary iron. Blood. 1999;93:4406–4417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Canonne-Hergaux F, Gruenheid S, Govoni G, Gros P. The Nramp1 protein and its role in resistance to infection and macrophage function. Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians. 1999;111:283–289. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1381.1999.99236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bozec D, Iuga AC, Roda G, Dahan S, Yeretssian G. Critical function of the necroptosis adaptor RIPK3 in protecting from intestinal tumorigenesis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:46384–46400. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mathern DR, et al. Mouse and human Notch-1 regulate mucosal immune responses. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:995–1005. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lin SM, Du P, Huber W, Kibbe WA. Model-based variance-stabilizing transformation for Illumina microarray data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e11. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:185–193. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Du P, Kibbe WA, Lin SM. lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1547–1548. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gibson-Corley KN, Olivier AK, Meyerholz DK. Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research. Vet. Pathol. 2013;50:1007–1015. doi: 10.1177/0300985813485099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article, its Supplementary Information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.