Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases logoLink to Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
. 2017 May 27;11(2):211–225.

Larval Habitats Characteristics of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in North-East of Iran

Aioub Sofizadeh 1, Seyed Hassan Moosa-Kazemi 2,*, Hossein Dehghan 2
PMCID: PMC5641610  PMID: 29062846

Abstract

Background:

There are unorganized, published documents about the ecology of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in northeastern part of Iran. The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution and characteristics of larval habitats of Culicidae in Kalaleh County.

Methods:

Larvae were collected using dipping method and adults by human landing catch technique during April–October, 2012. Larval habitat characteristics were recorded such as vegetation status, and sunlight, water situation. Lacto-phenol and de Faure’s media were used for conserving and mounting samples. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software, version 11.5.

Results:

Out of the 395 larvae collected, 332 were adult mosquitoes comprising; Culiseta, Culex, Anopheles and Ochlerotatus genera and 14 species including An. superpictus, An. maculipennis s.l., An. hyrcanus, An. psudopictus, An. claviger, Culex pipiens, Cx. theileri, Cx. perexiguus, Culiseta longiareolata, Cs. subochrea, Ochlerotatus caspius, Oc. echinus and Oc. geniculatus. Culex pipiens larvae were predominant (27.6%) and Cs. subochrea (1%) was found as the lowest species in terms of number. In the adult form, Cx. pipiens (28.9%) was predominant whereas, Cs. subochrea and Cx. perexiguus were reported to have had the lowest frequency.

Conclusion:

The larvae of An. superpictus and An. maculipennis species as the main vectors of malaria in north of Iran were reported in permanent habitats with clear water and vegetation, full and partial sunlight situations and muddy as well as sandy substrates that are important in larvicide application programs. Exclusive studies are necessary to diagnose An. maculipennis species complex using molecular and morphological analysis in the future.

Keywords: Larval habitats, Mosquitoes, Iran

Introduction

Culicidae family is one of the largest and most medically important families of Diptera. By now, 64 species and 3 subspecies have been identified in seven genera and 16 subgenera in Iran (Azari-Hamidian 2007a). Habitats of the mosquito larval stages affect the distribution pattern of adult stages. Mosquito habitats are classified as natural or artificial, permanent or temporary. Indeed, larval habitats are considered as specific for each mosquito species. Moreover, studies on mosquito larval habitats could be useful for vector control programs (Bruce-Chawat 1980).

There are scattered studies on bionomics and ecology of mosquitoes in northeast of Iran. Macan (1950) mentioned some ecological aspects of Anopheles species in the near East of Iran. Dow (1953) reported some characteristics of larval habitats of six Culex species. Larval habitats of Cx. pipiens were previously studied in Tehran Province (Golestani 1967). Lotfi (1970, 1973, and 1976) studied temperature and pH of larval habitats of mosquito larvae in Iran. The characteristics of larval habitats of mosquitoes were subsequently reported in Minab area, south of Iran (Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. 1986). The distribution and characteristics of larval habitats of mosquitoes in Iran were studied by Zaim in 1987. The ecology and fauna of mosquitoes were reported in Esfahan Province (Mousa-Kazemi et al. 2000a). Azari-Hamidian (2005, 2006, 2007b, 2011) and Azari-Hamidian et al. (2011) reported diversity and larval habitats of mosquitoes in the north of Iran. Besides, physical and chemical factors affecting larval habitats of Anopheles species were studied in southeast of Iran (Ghanbari et al. 2005). Some studies about the ecology and fauna of mosquitoes were reported in Neka County, northern part of Iran (Nikookar et al. 2015). Ecology and morphological characteristics of mosquitoes were reported in Yazd City, central Iran (Dehghan et al. 2010). Larval habitats and biodiversity of anopheline mosquitoes and some environmental characteristics were studied in southern Iran (Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2012, Soleimani-Ahmadi et al. 2013).

There are scattered information about fauna and ecological characteristics of mosquitoes in Golestan Province. By now, 10 Anopheles and 14 Culicinae species were identified using morphological characters and the surface patterns of eggs. Earlier studies had been conducted in northeastern part of Iran including Mazandaran and north Khorasan Provinces (Gutsevich 1943, Zolotarev 1945, Dow 1953, Zaim 1987, Sedaghat et al. 2003, Nikookar et al. 2015).

Mosquito-borne diseases including malaria, arboviral diseases and filariasis are the most common arthropod borne diseases in the world (Gubler 1998). Presently, malaria is one of the most important problems in Iran. Golestan Province was one of the malaria foci in Iran but there are no imported cases in the province. Recently, number of endemic foci of malaria has been identified in different neighboring countries of Iran including Afghanistan, Pakistan and Tukmenistan and potential vectors are widely dispersed. However, a rapid spread of the diseases is likely to occur due to the lack of vector control programs (Ministry of Health and Medical Education, 2012).

Epidemics occur in Turkmenistan, a neighboring country of Iran, climate change and the imported cases are considered as the most reasons for the increase in diseases from 2003–2004 (Ministry of Health and Medical Education, 2012). Kalaleh County is located in the north-east of Iran. Because of favorable weather which supports the breeding of mosquitoes, risk of malaria transmission, immigration and lack of malaria control, it is important to obtain adequate information in the field of malaria epidemiology in order to optimize the implementation of fundamental research programs. In addition, study on the ecology of malaria vectors in this area will help obtain better management of vector control and proper approach to malaria control programs.

Therefore, this study was carried out to determine some ecological aspects of the Culicidae species and characteristics of their habitats in Kalaleh County, Golestan Province, northeast of Iran.

Materials and Methods

Study area

A cross-sectional study was carried out in Kalaleh County, Golestan Province, northern Iran from April to October 2012. This study took place in seven randomly selected rural villages of the County (37° 70 ′N 55°81′ E). The samples were collected in plain, slope and mountainous areas. The province is bounded by Caspian Sea and Mazandaran Province in the West, Semnan Province in the South, North Khorasan Province in the East and Turkmenistan Country in the North (Fig. 1). Most parts of Golestan Province are plain and more than 2/3 of the plain areas have arid and semiarid climates and 1/3 of others have a mild climate. This County has 4962km and a population of 153261 people and is located in northeast of Golestan Province. The main agricultural products are Alfa alfa, water melon and cotton. Maximum and minimum of precipitation were recorded as 40.8 and −0.02 respectively and mean annual relative humidity was recorded as 67%. The total annual rainfall was 772mm, the minimum in August and maximum in February.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

The study area of Kalaleh County, Golestan Province, North of Iran

Mosquito sampling

Sampling was carried out using dipping method for collecting mosquito larvae and night catch for adult collection. Larval sampling method was carried out using standard dipper of 350ml. Each habitat was sampled in different parts of the larval habitats for 10 times. In order to clarify the samples collected, they were conserved and transported to the laboratory in vials containing lacto-phenol solution. The vials were labeled based on sample’s date code and their associated habitats. Features such as larval habitat status (permanent or temporary, stagnant or slow-running water), vegetation type, substrate type, habitat types and position of the sunlight were recorded on special forms. The night catch method was carried out using suction tubes from animal baited traps. Animal baited collection was conducted from 18.00 PM to 03.00 AM monthly in fixed animal shelters randomly placed in each village. Sample containers were protected from light and heat and were transferred to the Laboratory of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, where the authors identified the specimens using the taxonomic keys of Shahgudian 1960, Zaim and Cranston 1986, Harbach 1985, and Azari-Hamidian and Harbach 2009. The mosquito name abbreviations were cited based on Reinert (2009).

Results

Overall, 395 larvae and 332 adult mosquitoes in 4 genera and 14 species in seven sampling places were found in this area. Four species of Culex, five species of Anopheles, two species of Culiseta and three species of Ochlerotatus were identified. The species of mosquito larvae which were reported included: An. superpictus Grassi, An. maculipennis s.l, An. hyrcanus (Pallas), An. psudopictus, An. claviger (Meigen), Cx. pipiens Linnaeus, Cx. theileri Theobald, Cx. hortensis Ficalbi, Cx. perexiguus Theobald, Cs. longiareolata (Macquart), Cs. subochrea (Edwards), Oc. caspius s.l (Pallas), Oc. echinus (Edwards) and Oc. geniculatus (Olivier). All the species were found in adult forms except Cx. perexiguus.

Culex pipiens and Cs. longiareolata were the dominant species reported. The larvae and adult species of Cx. theileri, Cx. pipiens, Oc. caspius and Oc. echinus in all larval habitats were collected and presented in Table 1 and 2. The association of Cx. pipiens larvae with the other Culicidae species was more than the other species (Table 3).

Table 1.

Frequency of mosquito larvae which were collected by dipping method in Kalaleh County, 2012

Places Kheder -Olia jungle Ghoshe saver jungle Beili jungle Gorgandoz Barbar ghaleh Sade chamran Gharanki Jangal total Percentage
Species
An. claviger 1 0 1 4 2 5 1 14 3.5
An. superpictus 0 1 0 7 3 1 1 13 3.3
An. maculipennis s.l 1 2 4 1 2 5 4 19 4.8
An. psudopictus 1 1 2 4 0 2 5 15 4
An. hyrcanus 2 4 2 6 1 0 5 20 5.1
Cs. longiareolata 4 12 11 10 12 11 11 71 18.2
Cs. subochrea 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 4 1
Cx. theileri 10 10 8 4 2 4 1 39 9.9
Cx. hortensis 2 1 3 4 3 2 5 20 5.1
Cx. perexiguus 1 1 4 1 4 1 5 17 4.3
Cx. pipiens 15 14 24 15 14 14 13 109 27.6
Oc. caspius 6 4 6 5 6 3 1 31 7.8
Oc. echinus 2 1 3 1 2 4 2 15 3.8
Oc. geniculatus 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 6 1.5
Total 46 53 69 63 52 53 57 393 100
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Frequency of adult mosquitoes which were collected by night catch method from animal baited traps in Kalaleh County, 2012

Places Kheder Olia jungle Ghoshesaver jungle Ghoshechashme jungle Beili jungle Parpari jungle Aghsou jungle Azizabad total Percentage
Species
An. claviger 0 0 1 2 5 1 3 12 3.6
An. superpictus 5 1 0 3 1 5 2 17 5.1
An. maculipennis s.l 8 2 4 2 5 1 1 23 7
An. psudopictus 11 1 2 0 2 3 1 20 6
An. hyrcanus 12 4 2 1 0 3 3 25 7.6
Cs. longiareolata 4 2 3 2 1 0 4 16 4.8
Cs. subochrea 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.6
Cx. theileri 10 10 11 10 10 4 10 65 19.5
Cx. hortensis 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0.6
Cx. pipiens 15 14 12 14 14 12 15 96 28.9
Oc. caspius 6 4 2 6 3 4 5 30 9
Oc. echinus 2 1 2 2 4 1 1 13 3.9
Oc. geniculatus 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 11 3.3
Total 74 41 41 44 48 37 47 332 100
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

Association of mosquito larvae collected in Kalaleh County, 2012

Species No of larvae habitates An. claviger An. superpictus An. maculipennis s An. psudopictus An. hyrcanus Cs. longiareolata Cs. subochrea Cx. theileri Cx. hortensis Cx. perexiguus Cx. pipiens Oc. caspius Oc. echinus Oc. geniculatus
An.claviger 5 ✷ 1 3 2 5 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1
An. superpictus 5 1 ✷ 2 3 1 5 1 4 2 6 3 2 1 5
An.maculipennis sl 8 2 4 ✷ 2 5 1 4 3 6 2 1 5 2 6
An. psudopictus 11 1 2 1 ✷ 2 3 5 6 1 2 1 4 2 5
An. hyrcanus 12 4 2 3 1 ✷ 3 5 5 1 1 2 2 1 4
Cs. longiareolata 14 12 13 14 12 11 ✷ 11 12 14 11 9 8 7 9
Cs. subochrea 5 2 3 5 4 1 2 ✷ 1 2 5 4 3 2 1
Cx. theileri 15 12 14 15 12 13 14 12 ✷ 11 12 9 8 6 8
Cx. hortensis 5 1 2 4 3 2 1 5 1 ✷ 2 4 5 3 6
Cx. perexiguus 5 1 2 1 4 1 2 5 1 4 ✷ 4 5 3 4
Cx. pipiens 15 14 12 15 14 14 12 13 11 14 12 ✷ 12 14 15
Oc. caspius 6 4 2 5 6 3 4 1 5 2 5 2 ✷ 4 5
Oc. echinus 4 1 2 1 2 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 ✷ 3
Oc. geniculatus 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 ✷
Open in a new tab

Larval habitats of some mosquito species were diverse. Anopheles claviger and Oc. geniculatus larvae were collected only in permanent larval habitats (Table 4). An. claviger, An. superpictus, An. hyrcanus, Oc. geniculatus larvae were found in the larval habitats without vegetation, whereas Cs. longiareolata and Cs. subochrea were collected from habitats with vegetation (Table 4). Most larval habitats were found with substrate of mud and sand bottom and fewer larvae were collected in rocks and cement substrates. Besides, total number of samples of Anopheles species was collected in fresh water (Table 4).

Table 4.

Larval habitat characteristics of mosquitoes collected in Kalaleh County, 2012

Larval habitat An. claviger An. superpictus An. maculipennis sl An. psudopictus An. hyrcanus Cs. longiareolata Cs. subochrea Cx. theileri Cx. hortensis Cx. perexiguus Cx. pipiens Oc. caspius Oc. echinus Oc. geniculatus
Habitat
Permanent 100 92.8 92.7 64.3 95.5 77.2 21 73 65.3 36.1 93.8 93 89 100
Temporary 0 7.2 7.3 35.7 4.5 22.8 79 27 34.7 63.9 6.2 7 11 0
Slow-running water 8 55.5 85 63 12 32 45 64 2.3 9 65.5 61 69 100
Stagnant water 92 45.5 15 37 88 68 55 36 97.7 91 35.5 39 31 0
Vegetation
With 0 0 95.3 89 0 100 100 55 36 59 69.7 59 94 0
Without 100 100 4.7 11 100 0 0 45 64 41 29.3 41 6 100
Substrate
Mud 100 80 14 39 79 69 65 45 65 73 31.3 96 89 100
Sand 0 20 86 61 21 21 35 35 25 27 47.7 3 11 0
Rock and Cement 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 20 10 0 21 1 0 0
Water Situation
Turbid 0 0 0 0 0 65 78 64 49 61 81 79 0 55
Clear 100 100 100 100 100 35 22 36 51 39 19 21 100 45
Sunlight situation
Full sunlight 0 0 94.5 79 21.8 89 24 56 61 59 63 69 69 56
Partial sunlight 65 65 5.5 21 41 11 76 44 39 41 37 31 31 44
Shaded 35 35 0 0 37.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Habitat Kind
Natural 100 55.9 55.8 35.5 100 65 82 87 71 89 100 36 74 69
Artificial 0 44.1 44.2 64.5 0 35 18 13 29 11 0 64 26 31
Open in a new tab

Discussion

In our study, a total of 395 larvae and 332 adults were found in 4 genera and 14 species. The mosquito species that were identified included, An. claviger, An. hyrcanus, An. maculipennis s.l, An. psudopictus, An. superpictus, Cx. hortensis, Cx. perexiguus, Cx. pipiens, Cx. theileri, Cs. longiareolata, Cs. subochrea, Oc. caspius, Oc. echinus and Oc. geniculatus.

The checklist of Culicidae has been prepared and reported in Mazandaran, Golestan and North-Khorasan Provinces (Dow 1953, Zaim 1987, Sedaghat et al. 2003, Sedaghat and Harbach 2005, Azari-Hamidian et al. 2011, Nikookar et al. 2015). The mosquito species which were recorded in this area were discovered by other authors who used PCR technique and those that were not identified or reported in our study are shown by asterisk (*) as follows:

Anophles claviger Meigen, An. hyrcanus Pallas, An. maculipennis Meigen, An. melanoon Hackett*, An. persiensis Linton, Sedaghat and Harbach*, An. plumbeus Stephens*, An. pulcherrimus Theobald*, An. pseudopictus Grassi, An. sacharovi Favre*, An. superpictus Grassi, Aedes vexans Meigen*, Culex hortensis Ficalbi, Cx. mimeticus Noe*, Cx. perexiguus Theobald, Cx. pipiens Linnaeus, Cx. theileri Theobald, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus Giles*, Cx. modestus Ficalbi*, Culiseta annulata Schrank*, Cs. longiareolata Macquart, Cs. subochrea Edwards, Ochlerotatus caspius s.l. Pallas, Oc. echinus Edwards, Oc. geniculatus Olivier, Oc. pulcritarsis* Rondani, Uranotaenia unguiculata Edwards*.

Dow (1953) mentioned Anopheles mosquito fauna in Gorgan (Aliabad and Ramian) including: An. hyrcanus var. pseudopictus (in the now An.pseudopictus), An. pulcherrimus, An. superpictus, and An. maculipennis group (An. maculipennis, An. melanoon subspecies subalpinus (in the now subspecies of “subalpinus” is synonym of “melanoon”) (in and An. sacharovi). Anopheles pulcherrimus was reported from Ali-Abad of Golestan Province by Dow in 1953. This species was reported in North-Khorasan (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2011), Moreover, the occurrence of this species in Golestan Province needs more considerations for future studies. Sedaghat et al. (2003) reported the occurrences of An. maculipennis, An. sacharovi, An. persiensis based on molecular identification and ITS2 sequences in Mazandaran Province which was bordered with Golestan. Sedaghat and Harbach (2005) confirmed the presence of An. melanoon, An. persiensis and An. pseudopictus species in Mazandaran Province.

Zaim (1987) reported 12 Culicinae species in Mazandaran including: Ae. vexans, Oc. geniculatus, Oc. pulcritarsis, Oc. echinus, Cx. hortensis, Cx. mimeticus, Cx. perexiguus, Cx. pipiens, Cx. theileri, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Culiseta longiareolata, Cs. subochrea. Nikookar et al. (2015) reported nine species of mosquito including: An. claviger, An. maculipennis, An. plumbeus, An. superpictus, Cs. annulata, Cs. longiareolata, Cx. mimeticus, Cx. pipiens, and Oc. geniculatus in Neka County, Mazandaran Province. Azari-Hamidian et al. (2011) reported fourteen species of mosquito representing five genera in North-Khorasan Province including: An. claviger, An. maculipennis, An. superpictus, An. pulcherrimus, Cx. hortensis, Cx. mimeticus, Cx. modestus, Cx. perexiguus, Cx. pipiens, Cx. theileri, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Cs. longiareolata, Oc. caspius and Ur. unguiculata

In our research, An. claviger was collected in permanent and stagnant habitats with muddy substrate, clear water, without vegetation. This species was only collected from natural habitats. In parallel, larval habitats of this species were reported in spring pools with partial sunlight, slow running water and shaded streams in Iraq and western Iran (Macan 1950). Other larval habitats of this species were expressed as small shallow and shaded stream, with vegetation in Maragheh area in northwestern part of Iran (Dow 1953). Nikookar et al. (2015) had found the larvae of An. claviger in permanent and stagnant water environments with vegetation and clay and stone substrate. In parallel, Macan (1950) had found An. claviger larvae in semi sunlight springs, and slow running pools of water in Iraq and western Iran. Dow (1953) reported the larval habitat of this species in shallow and small pools with little vegetation.

In this present study, An. maculipennis larvae were mainly collected from permanent and slow running water environments with vegetation. The other characteristics of larval habitat of the species were found as clear water, sunlight situations, and habitats with sandy substrate. The presence of An. maculipennis larvae was reported in permanent, transparent, semi-shady natural larval habitats with vegetation and cement or stone substrate (Nikookar et al. 2015). In parallel, the larva of this species was found in habitats with gravel substrate, sunny springs, and pools with stagnant water (Azari-Hamidian 2007b, Azari-Hamidian et al. 2011). At least 12 palearctic members of An. maculipennis complex were reported including An. atroparvus, An. beklemishevi, An. labranchiae, An. maculipennis, An. martinius, An. melanoon, An. messeae, An. sacharovi, An. persiensis, An. daciae, An. lewisi and An. Artemievi (White 1978, Ribeiro et al. 1988, Linton et al. 2002, Sedaghat et al. 2003a,b Djadid et al. 2007). Dow (1953) had reported the occurrence of An. subalpinus (in the now “subalpinus” is synonym of “melanoon”) in Sari, Babolsar, Mazandaran Province.

Saebi (1987) also cited the occurrence of An. messeae and An. melanon from Guilan Province, and An. sacharovi and An. hyrcanus in Golestan Province. This species has been identified in Guilan Province (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2004), Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces (Zaim et al. 1986). Anopheles maculipennis s.l. associated with An. hyrcanus, An. claviger from Mazandaran Province previously (Nikookar et al. 2015). An. sacharovi was cited in Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces (Sedaghat et al. 2003). Presently, five members of An. maculipennis complex have been reported. Anopheles maculipennis and An. sacharovi were identified based on the characteristics of eggs, larvae and adults as well as through the PCR technique, An. messeae, An. persiensis and An. melanoon were identified based on pattern of eggs surface and PCR technique (Sedaghat and Harbach 2005). Anopheles maculipennis was reported more in rice fields, while An. sacharovi was found more in mountainous areas (Mousa-Kazemi et al. 2000, Sedaghat et al. 2003). Although, it is difficult to find the difference between An. maculipennis and An. sacharovi species in larval stages, but in our research An. maculipennis species was identified based on the Azari-Hamidian and Harbach (2009)’s systematic key.

Anopheles superpictus was reported as one of the main malaria vectors and salivary infection was found as ranging from 0.65 to 4.6% (Manuchehri et al. 2003). This species with An. maculipennis was considered as the malaria vector during the outbreak of the diseases which had occurred in Azerbaijan at the borderline of the country, Armenia, and Turkey countries in 1990. However, after the independence of the southern republics of the former Soviet Union, Iran was threatened by imported malaria cases (Oshaghi et al. 2011). In present study, An. superpictus was collected in natural habitats. The characteristics of larval habitat of this species were mainly in permanent water without vegetation, clear water, semi-sunlight and shaded habitats with muddy substrate. Zolotarev (1945), Dow (1953) and Nikookar et al. (2015) have reported the occurrence of this species in Mazandaran Province. Anophles superpictus larvae was found in permanent, stagnant, with muddy substrate, transparent water, semi-shady, natural with vegetation habitats in Neka county, northern Iran (Nikookar et al. 2015). Moreover, Azari-Hamidian et al. (2011) have stated its presence in stagnant, transient, muddy substrate, full sunlight water with vegetation in natural habitats in Guilan Province, northern Iran. Further support for our results comes from some previous studies carried out in Kermanshah and Kurdistan Provinces, western Iran (Moosa-Kazemi et al. 2015, Macan 1950), Zarrin-Shahr and Mobarakeh areas of Isfahan Province, center of Iran (Mousa-Kazemi et al. 2000a), Ardabil Province, northwestern Iran (Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. 2001), Rasht County of Guilan Province, northern Iran (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2002b) and in Iranshahr, southeastern part of the country (Ghanbari et al. 2005). Three genotypes named X, Y, and Z within An. superpictus during the molecular study were reported in Iran (Oshaghi et al. 2008). By now, there are no reports about the genotypes of this species in Golestan Province. However, it needs to be studied in the future.

In our study, An. hyrcanus was found as the dominant species in larval habitats followed by An. maculipennis in Kalaleh County. An. hyrcanus larvae were collected from habitats with varieties of 95.5% permanence, 88% stagnant water, and were only collected in clear water, natural habitats without vegetation. Different sunlight situations characterized the larval habitats of this species. The current species prefer the permanent habitats to temporary larval habitats. Moreover, An. pseudopictus prefers the habitats with slow running water while An. hyrcanus prefers the stagnant water habitats.

Three species of the hyrcanus Group including An. hyrcanus, An. peditaeniatus and An. pseudopictus have been reported in Iran (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2006, Azari-Hamidian 2007a). Several species of An.hyrcanus Group have been reported as the malaria vectors in the Oriental and Palearctic Regions, however, this species was reported as a potential malaria vector based on the molecular study in Guilan Province (Djadid et al. 2009). Shahgudian (1960) made mention of An. nigerrimus species as a variety of An. hyrcanus in its systematic key, Moreover, identification of these species is very difficult and is based on this systematic key and this old record needs to be verified. Glick (1992) published keys for the identification of female anophelines of southwest Asia, which mentioned the females of the Hyrcanus Group, however these characters were not reliable for distinguishing the females of An. peditaeniatus from other species of hyrcanus group. One character distinguished the larvae of An. hyrcanus from those of An. pseudopictus (Darsie and Samanidou-Voyadjoglou 1997). An. hyrcanus and An. pseudopictus were reported as a single species in southeastern France based on PCR technique (Ponçon et al. 2008). ‘The systematics of the Iranian species of the Hyrcanus Group’ was published by Azari-Hamidian and Harbach in 2009.

In our study, Cx. pipiens larvae were identified in this area based on the larval seta 1 of abdominal segments III and IV. This character was observed as double seta in all of Cx. pipiens larvae samples and this confirmed the occurrence of Cx. pipiens species. This species is cosmopolite and is distributed in all parts of the country (Zaim 1987, Nikookar et al. 2015).

Culex pipiens was predominant in larval (27.6%) and adult (28.9%) stages. Further support to this result also came from previous study, Cx. pipiens was reported as the dominant species in Yazd Province (Dehghan et al. 2010). Culex pipiens was reported as the predominant species in Guilan Province and dominant species in Isfahan Province (Mousa-Kazemi et al. 2000a, Azari-Hamidian 2007b). Larval habitats of this species were diverse in Kalaleh County but all samples of this species were collected in natural habitats. Similarly, Zaim (1987) cited the fresh water environments such as marshes, channels and artificial irrigation and rain-filled pools and drums as the main larval habitats of Cx. pipiens. Distribution and abundance of Cx. pipiens species were in close relationship with economic activities and development of new territories (Vinogradova 2000). Underground train systems, coal mines, drains, wells, septic tanks, abandoned and variety of the natural and artificial habitats were reported as the main larval habitats of Cx. pipiens (Horsfall 1955, Zaim 1987, Harbach 1988).

In our study, Cx. pipiens larvae were collected only in natural larval habitats, further support of this result came from the previous study, Dow (1953), Lotfi (1970, 1976), Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. (1986), Zaim (1987) and Azari-Hamidian (2007b) found this species mostly in natural habitats. Moreover, Mousa-Kazemi et al. (2000), Azari-Hamidian et al. (2002b) have reported the presence of these species from rice fields and man-made habitats respectively. Water and sewage wells as well as house ponds were reported as the main habitats of Cx. pipiens in cities (Golestani 1967, Lotfi 1976, Zaim 1987, Dehghan et al. 2010, 2011).

In our study, Cx. theileri was found as predominant species at larvae and adult stages. This species was known as one of the predominant species in Northwest of Iran (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2009). Moosa-Kazemi et al. (2010) had reported that the Cx. theileri species was the second dominant species in Kurdistan Province followed by Cx. pipiens. Larval habitats of this species in our research were found as natural habitats, and permanent habitats with vegetation such as irrigation ditches, different pools, open cisterns, dis-used wells seepage water and swamps (Harbach 1988).

Lotfi (1970, 1976) had reported that the predominant species were in larval habitats such as grassy and ponds, rice fields, seepages and agricultural pools in Iran.

In our study, Cx. theileri larvae was collected from different types of habitats with 73% permanence, 64% slow running water, turbidity of 64% and 87% in natural habitats. The breeding place preferences of this species were full and partial sunlight habitats. In parallel, Azari-Hamian (2007b) had reported different types of larval habitats. Dehghan et al. (2010) reported that the larval habitats of this species were swam plants, permanent, and with vegetation outside or inside water environments in Hamadan Province. Dow (1953) reported that the larvae of Cx. theileri were accumulated in the pit and irrigation channels and water intakes and shallow rivers and river beds. Larval habitats of the species have been found as algae, water intake and water pits, and a crock pot, household pits along the river margins, floating and submerged plants (Horsfall 1955). Natural and artificial habitats of Cx theileri were cited in the Country (Dow 1953, Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. 1986). Mousa-Kazemi et al. (2000) also discovered the presence of Cx theileri larvae in the rice field, however Zaim (1987) had reported their presence in natural habitats. Natural habitats such as pools were reported as the main habitats of this species (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2002b, 2007b).

In this study, more samples of Cx. hortensis larvae were collected from natural habitats. Moreover, this species prefers permanent and stagnant water habitats. This species is associated with An. superpictus and Oc. Geniculatus, both of which prefer habitats without vegetation so that 66% of the larval samples of this species were collected in habitats without vegetation. Culex hortensis species were found more in muddy beds and habitats with full and partial sunlight.

Horsfall (1955) had reported that the main larval habitats of Cx. hortensis were algal mats, seeps, brackish pools, domestic containers, and cement channel. This species was reported in pools in the river beds, the irrigation ditches, small, spring pools of the river banks and shallow pools (Dow 1953). Natural habitat was reported as the main habitat of this species (Zaim 1987, Azari-Hamidian 2007b). This species was collected in seepages and agricultural water storage pools (Lotfi 1976).

In our study, Cx. perexiguus was collected and reported at the first timein Golestan Province. More of these species were collected in natural habitats. Mousa-Kazemi et al. (2000a) have reported the occurrences of Cx. pipiens, Cx. theileri and Cx. perexiguus in Zarrin-Shahr and Mobarakeh areas of Isfahan Province.

By now, 5 species of Culiseta have been reported in Iran and they included: Cs. Allotheobaldialongiareolata, Cs. Culisetaalaskaensis, Cs. Culiseta) annulata, Cs. (Culicella) morsitans and Cs. (Culiseta) subochrea (Azari-Hamidian 2005). In our studied species, Cs. logiareolata and Cs. subochrea were collected. There is little information available about the ecology of the Culiseta species. Larval habitats of Cs. longiareolata contained organic materials with high abundance in artificial pits of Yazd Province (Dehghan et al. 2010). Association of this species with Cx. pipiens was found in the larval habitats which were contaminated with soil and wastewater in drinking troughs made of cement, a place to store water for animals and livestock in Yazd Province (Dehghan et al. 2010). In our study, Cs. longiareolata larvae were abundant, followed by Cx. pipiens and more were collected from permanent, stagnant and full sunlight habitats with vegetation. In contrast, the larval habitat of this species was without vegetation in Hamadan Province (Dehghan et al. 2011). This species has high adaptability to different ecological conditions. More Cs. subochera were collected in natural and temporal habitats. Similarly, these species were collected in the same larval habitats (Zaim 1987) while all the other larvae of the species were collected from permanent habitats in Hamadan Province. Moreover, Cs. subochrea had low abundance in this area. This species has been identified in various studies in Iran. Similarly, this species was collected as the lowest species in Hamedan Province (in terms of abundance), located in the western part of Iran. They prefer the habitats with turbid water to clear water and full sunlight habitats to shaded habitats. In Hamadan area of western Iran, the larval habitat of this species was reported as the same larval habitat in our study in turbid to clear water and full sunlight habitats. Unlike the previous study, we found more larvae in shaded habitats (Dehghan et al. 2011).

In our study, 3 species of Ochlerotatus including Oc. caspius, Oc. echinus and Oc. geniculatus were collected; Nikookar et al. (2015) had reported the occurrence of Oc. echinus and Oc. geniculatus in tree hole habitats in northern part of Iran. In our study, all the current three Ochlerotatus species preferred the permanent habitats with slow-running water and muddy bed. In addition, Oc. echinus preferred the clear water habitats while Oc. caspius preferred the larval habitats with turbid water and Oc. geniculatus was found in habitats without vegetation.

Ochlerotatuscaspius was reported as a potent vector for Rift Valley fever viruses as well as Dirofilaria immitis in the world (Azari-Hamidian 2006). This species loves feeding more on mammals and human and was found more in their dwellings (Azari-Hamidian 2006). In our research, this species comprised 7.8% of the larval collection and 9% of adult catches by animal baited trap collection method in various areas of Golestan Province, northeastern Iran. Further support to this result comes from some previous studies carried out in Kermanshah and Kurdistan Provinces, western Iran (Mousa-Kazemi et al. 2015), Zarrin-Shahr and Mobarakeh areas of Isfahan Province, center of Iran (Mousa-Kazemi et al. 2000a), Guilan Province, northwestern Iran (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2002a), Bushehr Province, southern Iran (Dow 1953), Eastern part of the country (Minar 1974) and various parts of Iran (Zaim 1987). In Kurdistan Province, Cx. theileri was next in abundance after this species (Moosa-Kazemi et al. 2010).

Ochlerotatusechinus was distributed in the Mediterranean region, north of Africa and southern Europe. In our study, out of the 9% total larvae collected from adult catches using animal baited traps in various areas of Golestan Province-northern Iran, 7.8% were Oc. echinus. In parallel, this species was reported in Mazandaran Province (Zaim 1987, Nikookar et al. 2015). This species has been reported in Guilan Province, northern Iran (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2002a).

Ochlerotatusgeniculatus was distributed in the Palearectic Region, Europe, North of Africa and Southeast Asia. In our research, this species comprised 1.5% of the larval collection and 3.9% of adult catches by animal baited traps in various areas of Golestan Province, northern Iran. This species was reported for the first time in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran (Gutsevich 1943). This species has been reported in Guilan Province, northern Iran (Azari-Hamidian et al. 2002a).

Conclusion

The present investigation indicates some biological characteristics of mosquitoes in the northern areas of Iran. Because of diversity in larval habitats and variety in species of mosquito in the County, results of this study could be useful in vector control programs. Several species of Anopheles were found in a lot of areas in the county. The larval habitats of Anopheles were found and reported in permanent habitats with clear water. Besides, the larvae of An. superpictus and An. maculipennis species which are the main vectors of malaria in the north of Iran were reported in habitats with vegetation, under full and partial sunlight situations and muddy and sandy substrates that are important in larviciding programs. Bionomic studies of other mosquitoes need to be more rigorously studied in the future. Also, more studies should be obtained in order to complete information about of bionomics of mosquitoes in other parts of Iran.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the people of villages in Kalaleh County for their kind cooperation during the study. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Azari-Hamidian SH, Joeafshani MA, Mosslem M, Rassaei MR. (2002a) Mosquitoes of the genus Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Guilan. J Med Fac Guilan Univ Med Sci. 11(43): 29–42 (Persian). [Google Scholar]
  2. Azari-Hamidian S, Joeafshani MA, Mosslem M, Rassaei AR. (2002b) Taxonomic survey of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicida) in Guilan Province with reporting of a subgenus new to Iranian mosquito fauna. The 15th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, 7–11 September 2002, Razi University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran, pp. 319–320 (Persian). [Google Scholar]
  3. Azari-Hamidian S, Joeafshani MA, Rassaei AR, Mosslem M, Mousavi-Eivanaki E. (2004) mosquito fauna of the genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) in Guilan Province. Modarres J Med Sci. 6: 11–22 (Persian). [Google Scholar]
  4. Azari-Hamidian S. (2005) Larval habitat characteristics of mosquitoes of the genus Culiseta Felt, 1904 (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Caspian Sea littoral, Iran. Zool Middle East. 36(1): 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  5. Azari-Hamidian S. (2006) On the ecology of the tribe Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae in the Caspian sea littoral, Iran. The 11th International Congress of Parasitology, 2006 August, 6–11, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. [Google Scholar]
  6. Azari-Hamidian S, Abai MR, Ladonni H, Vatandoost H, Akbarzadeh K. (2006) Anopheles peditaeniatus (Leicester) new to the Iranian mosquito fauna with notes on Anopheles hyrcanus group in Iran. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 22(1): 144–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Azari-Hamidian S. (2007a) Checklist of Iranian mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Ecol. 32: 235–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Azari-Hamidian S. (2007b) Larval habitat characteristics of mosquitoes of the genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Guilan Province, Iran. Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 1(1): 9–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Abai MR, Mobedi I, Linton YM, Harbach RE. (2009) Distribution and ecology of mosquitoes in a focus of dirofilariasis in northwestern Iran, with the first finding of filarial larvae in naturally infected local mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 23(2): 111–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Azari-Hamidian SH, Harbach RE. (2009) Keys to the adult females and forth-instar larvae of the mosquitoes of Iran. Zootaxa. 2078(1): 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  11. Azari-Hamidian S, Abai MR, Arzamani K, Bakhshi H, Karami H, Ladonni H, Harbach RE. (2011) Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of North Khorasan Province, northeastern Iran and the zoogeographic affinities of the Iranian and middle Asian mosquito fauna. J Entomol. 8(3): 204–217. [Google Scholar]
  12. Azari-Hamidian S. (2011) Larval habitat characteristics of the genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) and a checklist of mosquitoes in Guilan Province, northern Iran. Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 5(1): 37–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bruce-Chwatt LJ. (1980) Essential malariology. Vol. 1. Oxford Press, London. [Google Scholar]
  14. Darsie RF, SamanidouVoyadjoglou A. (1997) Keys for the identification of the mosquitoes of Greece. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 13(3): 247–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dehghan H, Sadraei J, Moosa-Kazemi SH. (2010) The morphological variations of Culexpipiens larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Yazd Province, Central Iran. Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis. 4(2): 42–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dehghan H, Moosa-Kazemi SH, Zahirnia AH, Davari B, Sharifi F. (2011) Larval habitat diversity and species composition of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Hamadan Province. Sci. Hamadan J Univ Med Sci. 18(3): 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  17. Djadid ND, Gholizadeh S, Tafsiri E, Romi R, Gordeev M, Zakeri S. (2007) Molecular identification of Palearctic members of Anopheles maculipennis in northern Iran. Malar J. 6: 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dinparast Djadid N, Jazayeri H, Gholizadeh S, Pashaei Rad SH, Zakeri S. (2009) First record of a new member of Anopheles hyrcanus group from Iran: Molecular identification, diagnosis, phylogeny, status of kdr resistance and Plasmodium infection. J Med Entomol. 46 (5): 1084–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dow RP. (1953) Notes on Iranian Mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2(4): 683–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghanbari MR, Rakhsh Khorshid A, Salehi M, Hassanzehi A. (2005) The study of physical and chemical factors affecting larval habitats of Anopheles in Iranshahr. Tabib-e-Shargh, J Zahedan Univ Med Sci. 7(3): 221–227 (Persian with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Glick JI. (1992) Illustrated key to the female Anopheles of southwestern Asia and Egypt Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Syst. 24(2): 125–153. [Google Scholar]
  22. Golestani J. (1967) The methods of the mosquito Culex control in Tehran City. J General Med Tehran Univ Med School. 6: 376–379 (In Persian). [Google Scholar]
  23. Gubler DJ. (1998) Resurgent Vector-Borne Diseases as a Global Health Problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 4(3): 442–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gutsevich AV. (1943) on the mosquitoes of north Iran. Comptes Rendus Academic Science USSR. 40(3): 123–125. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Charrahy Z, Haghdoost AA, Sedaghat MM, Abedi F, Soltani M, Raeisi A. (2012) Larval habitats and biodiversity of anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a malarious area of southern Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 49(2): 91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Harbach RE. (1985) Pictorial keys to the genera of mosquitoes, subgenera of Culex and the species of Culex (Culex) occurring southwestern Asia and Egypt, with a note on the sub generic placement of Culexdeserticola (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Syst. 17(2): 83–107. [Google Scholar]
  27. Harbach RE. (1988) The mosquitoes of the subgenus Culex in southwestern Asia and Egypt (Diptera: Culicidae). Am Entomol Inst. 24(1): 1–236. [Google Scholar]
  28. Horsfall WR. (1955) Mosquitoes. Their Bionomics and Relation to Disease. Hafner Publishing Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  29. Linton YM, Samanidou-Voyadjoglou A, Har-bach RE. (2002) Ribosomal ITS2 sequence data for Anopheles maculipennis and An. messeae in northern Greece, with a critical assessment of previously published sequences. Insect Mol Biol. 11: 379–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lotfi MD. (1970) Iranian species of genus Culex (Diptera: Culicinae). Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 63: 399–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lotfi MD. (1973) Iranian species of genus Culex II Report of four species of larvae and 14 adult species. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 66(1): 204–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lotfi MD. (1976) Key to Culicinae of Iran, genus Culex and their biology (Diptera: Culicidae). Iran J Public Health. 5: 71–84. [Google Scholar]
  33. Macan TT. (1950) Anopheles and malaria in the Near East. The Anopheline mosquitoes of Iraq and North Persia. Vol .7. HK and Lewis Press, London. [Google Scholar]
  34. Minar J. (1974) Results of Czechoslovak-Iranian entomological expedition to Iran, Diptera: Culicidea. Acta Entomol Mus Nat. Pragae. 6: 87–89. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran (2012) Annual report of malaria control department. CDC, Teheran, Iran. [Google Scholar]
  36. Moosa-Kazemi SH, Vatandoost H, Nikookar H, Fathian M. (2009) Culicinae (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes in Chabahar County, Sistan and Baluchistan Province, Southeastern Iran. Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis. 3(1): 29–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moosa-Kazemi SH, Karimian F, Davari B. (2010) Culicinae mosquitoes in Sanandaj County, Kurdistan Province, Western Iran. J. Vector Borne Dis. 47(1): 103–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moosa-Kazemi SH, Zahirnia AH, Sharifi F, Davari B. (2015) The fauna and ecology of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Western Iran. J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 9(1): 49–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mousa-Kazemi S, Zaim M, Zahraii A. (2000a) Fauna and ecology of Culicidae of the Zarrin-Shahr and Mobarakeh area in Isfahan Province. Armaghan Danesh, J Yasuj Univ Med Sci. 5(13): 46–54 (Persian with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  40. Mousa-Kazemi SH, Motabar M, Majdzadeh SR. (2000) Malaria status in Hormozgan Province. 5th IEA Eastern Mediterranean Regional Scientific Meeting, Manameh, Bahrain, pp. 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nikookar SH, Moosa-Kazemi SH, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Ataei A, Anjamrooz M. (2015) Fauna and larval habitat characteristics of mosquitoes in Neka County, Northern Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 9(2): 253–266. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Gorouhi A, Abai MR, Madjidpour A, Arshi S, Sadeghi H, Nazari M, Mehravaran A. (2011) Anopheline species composition in borderline of Iran-Azerbaijan. Acta Trop. 119(1): 44–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ponçon N, Toty C, Kengne P, Alten B, Fontenille D. (2008) Molecular evidence for similarity between Anopheles hyrcanus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anopheles pseudopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), sympatric potential vectors of malaria in France. J Med Entomol. 45(3): 576–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reinert JF. (2009) List of abbreviations for currently valid generic-level taxa in family Culicidae (Diptera). Eur Mosq Bull. 27: 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ribeiro H, Ramos HC, Pires CA, Capela RA. (1988) An annotated checklist of the mosquitoes of continental Portugal (Diptera: Culicidae). Congreso Ibérico de Entomologia. 3: 233–254. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sedaghat MM, Linton YM, Nicolescu G, Smith L, Koliopoulos G, Zounos AK, Oshagi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach RE. (2003a) Morphological and molecular characterization of Anopheles sacharovi Favore, a primary vector of malaria in the Middle East. Syst Entomol. 28: 241–256. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sedaghat MM, Linton YM, Oshagi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach RE. (2003b) The Anophelesmaculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran: Molecular characterization and recognition of a new species. Bull Entomol Res. 93: 527–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sedaghat MM, Harbach RE. (2005) An annotated checklist of the Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran. J Vector Ecol. 30(2): 272–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sedaghat MM, Linton Y-M, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Harbach RE. (2003) The Anophelesmaculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran: molecular characterization and recognition of a new species. Bull Entomol Res. 93(6): 527–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shahgudian ER. (1960) A key to anophelines of Iran. Acta Med Iran. 3(3): 38–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Soleimani-Ahmadi M, Vatandoost H, Shaeghi M, Raeisi A, Abedi F, Eshraghian MR, Madani A, Safari R, Shahi M, Mojahedi A, Poorahmad-Garbandi F. (2012) Vector ecology and susceptibility in a malaria-endemic focus in southern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 18(10): 1034–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Soleimani-Ahmadi M, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Zare M, Safari R, Mojahedi A, Poorahmad-Garbandi F. (2013) Environmental characteristics of anopheline mosquito larval habitats in a malaria endemic area in Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 6(7): 510–515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Vinogradova EB. (2000) Culex pipienspipiens mosquitoes: taxonomy, distribution, ecology, physiology, genetics, applied importance and control. Pensoft Series Parasitologica. Vol 2. Pensoft Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Zaim M, Manouchehri AV. (1986) Studies on the biology of the mosquitoes in the district of Minab. Hormozgan Province, Iran, (1983–1984) 1-characteristics of the larval breeding sites. J Environ Study. 13(1: 17–39 (Persian). [Google Scholar]
  55. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Namazi J, Piazak N. (2001) Bionomics of Anopheles sacharovi in Ardebil Province, north western Iran during a larval control program. Acta Trop. 78(3): 207–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. White GB. (1978) Systematic reappraisal of the Anopheles maculipennis complex. Mosq Syst, 10: 13–44. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zaim M, Cranston PS. (1986) Checklist and keys to the Culicinae of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq Syst. 18(3–4): 233–245. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zaim M, Manouchehri AV, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR. (1986) Mosquito fauna of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae) other Culicinae. Iran J Public Health. 15(1–4): 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zaim M. (1987) The distribution and larval habitat characteristics of Iranian Culicinae. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 3 (4): 568–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zolotarev ER. (1945) Anopheles maculipennis of northern Iran. Med Parazitol (Mosk). 14: 50–57 (Russian). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES