Abstract
Due to the increasing prevalence of clarithromycin resistance, future of management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infections need to be recognized. To now, clarithromycin was the best effective, well-tolerated and safe antibiotic used in treatment of the bacterium, but, increasing trend of resistance reduced efficacy of recommended regimens. Indeed, gastroenterologists are mostly unable to start appropriate therapy-according to the sensitivity profile-due to the certain difficulties in routine H. pylori culture procedure and being time consuming method. This announcement by World Health Organization (WHO) was an onset to reconsider current challenging dilemma about H. pylori clarithromycin resistant isolates. Therefore, investigating of various factors affecting this nomination by WHO is highly welcomed. In fact, WHO enumerated more than 16 pathogens which seriously threats human life and public health, thus better management or effective guidelines are necessary. Here for the first time, we nominated this phenomenon as ‘‘gastroenterologist’s persistence’’ which should be equally investigated as antibiotic resistance. The ability of gastroenterologists to win the game against H. pylori infections is highly influenced by their collaboration with diagnostic laboratories to apply susceptibility patterns before any prescription. In conclusion, closer collaboration between two important partners (gastroenterologists and microbiologists) in management of H. pylori infection may hopefully trigger an era to remedy current crisis in clarithromycin resistance, a later gastric cancer can be practically preventable.
Keywords: Resistance, Clarithromycin, Helicobacter pylori, World Health Organization
Core tip: Due to the increasing prevalence of clarithromycin resistance, future of management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infections need to be rewritten. To now, clarithromycin was the best tolerated and safe antibiotic used in treatment of the bacterium, but, increasing trend of resistance reduced efficacy of therapeutic regimens recommended. In this paper, we discussed that why persistence of gastroenterologists is a critical item need to be considered if we really aim to increase efficacy of prescribed antibiotics against H. pylori.
INTRODUCTION
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is an infectious agent colonizes half of the world population and must be eradicated with suitable antibiotics[1,2]. Of twenty years ago, H. pylori was recognized as a major cause of peptic ulcers, thus many of these clinicians attempted to treat those colonized individuals with antibiotic[3]. Later, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that bacterial elimination can be a useful strategy to decrease mortality of gastric cancer in the world. Subsequently, in the first half of 2017, WHO listed the clarithromycin resistant-H. pylori in the category of high priority which requires intense attention on the treatment. This announcement by WHO is an onset to reconsider current challenging dilemma about H. pylori clarithromycin resistant isolates. Therefore, investigating of various factors affecting this nomination by WHO is highly welcomed. In fact, WHO enumerated more than 16 pathogens which seriously threats human life and public health, thus better management or effective guidelines are necessary. New visions of H. pylori treatment as well as the better insight of uncertain prescription of antibiotics in the fight against this bacterium is guaranteeing the solution to address the dilemma. Until 2004, H. pylori standard triple therapy include proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin providing the acceptable eradication rate, however, increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance hampered continuing the triple therapy for next years. As such, newer formulations were in the focus of researches among the gastroenterologists and microbiologists. As first line treatment for H. pylori-positive subjects, bismuth quadruple therapy or concomitant therapy consisting of a PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole are now highly recommended by many international guidelines[4-11]. Therefore, it seems that clarithromycin has an inevitable role in H. pylori treatment and even bacterial resistance seems not be able to remove its existence from therapeutic lines. In next section, we review the importance of clarithromycin and how the bacterium became resistant to this commonly used drug in treating the H. pylori.
H. PYLORI THERAPY-CLARITHROMYCIN AS KEY ANTIBIOTIC
Due to the traditional microbiologic rule, an infectious agent should be treated with appropriate antibiotics following the susceptibility tests. Despite many problematic infectious bacteria, the story is different for H. pylori. Notably, the success chance of regimen include clarithromycin, if a resistant bacterium exists, is less than 40%. This disappointing rate can apparently reflect the irrefutable role of clarithromycin as a core antibiotic in H. pylori therapy. The problem with this critical role is that antimicrobial resistance to this drug is sharply increasing and our hopes to have successful eradication regimens (i.e., consistent treatment success > 90%) including the clarithromycin is unfortunately falling.
CLARITHROMYCIN MECHANISM OF ACTION AND RESISTANCE
Clarithromycin is a bacteriostatic antibiotic mostly used in childhood to treat upper respiratory infections, but, its application to treat H. pylori is the most used indication[12,13]. The main action mode of clarithromycin as one of the wide-spectrum antibiotics used in H. pylori therapy is to prevent protein translation. Current knowledge about mechanisms of resistance to clarithromycin has shown the importance of several point mutations in the peptidyltransferase region encoded in domain V of 23s rRNA[14-16]. In 1996, versalovic et al[14] has shown that responsible mutations in the peptidyltransferase region cause an inhibition in binding space between the ribosomal subunit dedicated to specific antibiotic-related protein synthesis and clarithromycin.
Following the first exposure to the clarithromycin, spontaneously mutations (in both 23S rRNA operons) confer H. pylori resistance phenotype and genotype. The direct impact of these mutations is emergence of H. pylori strains resistant to clarithromycin. To now, two major mutations A2142G and A2143G were listed as main cause of antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates[17]. Indeed, the problem is started since the first exposure is not occurred against H. pylori. Clarithromycin is usually used to treat upper respiratory infections, therefore, colonized H. pylori is exposed in childhood already, while no gastroduodenal disorders happened! Another problematic side of this scenario is that antibiotic stress can easily increase the frequency of inducing mutations in cells. This fact in light of relevant usage of clarithromycin for upper respiratory infections in childhood can excuse why we need to be worried about wide-spread prescription of clarithromycin in clinical practice. In brief, our bacteria are almost resistant before we start to use clarithromycin against them in anti-H. pylori therapy. In other hands, efflux pump system is also a potential mechanism that confers clarithromycin resistance[18]. Current findings are insisting on at least four families of gene clusters of efflux pumps in H. pylori isolates[18,19]. Of them, the family that is found only in Gram-negative bacteria, is the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND). Bina et al[20] was first reported this family of efflux pumps, but additional data are missing to prove exact role of these structures to induce antibiotic resistance in H. pylori. The present data show that existence of efflux pumps in H. pylori strains can have synergic effect to induce antibiotic resistance in parallel with 23S rRNA mutations. The different angle of the problem is that while we still publishing the papers indicating on increased the emergence of clarithromycin resistance, our holistic view on the rationale for skyrocketing increase in resistance to clarithromycin is missing. Because of antibiotic resistance is a dynamic phenomenon, it may be found with outstandingly different rates even in a state of a country. In reality, the spread of clarithromycin resistant-H. pylori has another dimension which remains often undiscussed. Given a sharp increase in clarithromycin resistance during the last decade worldwide (P value < 0.011), H. pylori become difficult to eradicate even using various treatment guidelines (Figure 1). Within these three 5 years duration, we can understand the clarithromycin is getting more and more useless antibiotic against H. pylori in many countries.
Figure 1.
Resistance to clarithromycin among the Helicobacter pylori isolates in various countries. A: Before 2005; B: 2005-2010; C: 2011-2017.
CLARITHROMYCIN RESISTANCE: MOLECULAR DETECTION METHODS
Indeed, in absence of reliable culture-based method to produce data on susceptibility tests, molecular methods were developed rapidly in last decade[17]. Based on available molecular methods tracking 23S rRNA gene, a long list of methods have been developed to quickly identify resistance in colonized H. pylori strains to the clarithromycin (Table 1).
Table 1.
Molecular methods to identify mutations induce clarithromycin resistance in clinical Helicobacter pylori isolates
Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages | PCR-based method | Ref. |
Real-time PCR | Quick and reliable High specificity, high sensitivity | Relatively expensive | Yes | [21] |
PCR-LiPA | Fast and cheap | Moderate specificity and sensitivity | Yes | [22] |
DNA sequencing | Produce many information, | Expensive, Time-consuming protocol | Yes | [23] |
3’-mismatch PCR | Fast and high specificity | Produce limited data on the gene, not practically useful | Yes | [24] |
RFLP | High specificity, high sensitivity | Risk of contamination Low reproducibility | Yes | [15,25] |
FISH | High specificity, high sensitivity | Need invasive approach so not good for children | No | [26,27] |
FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation; RFLP: Restriction fragment length polymorphism; PCR-LiPA: PCR line probe assay.
Apart from progress have been made, still we are lacking in a quick method with accurate findings. Taking together, real-time PCR can be proposed as best option to be used in hospitals and even smaller centers. During the last years, many companies started to produce this machine and now it is way cheaper than 10 years ago (almost 10 folds). Therefore, we are suggesting to apply this machine to see what kind of mutations are existed 23S rRNA gene and forthcoming susceptibility profile will be easier to present.
NEW DIMENSION OF PROBLEM: GASTROENTEROLOGIST'S PERSISTENCE
Face to face with the problem, we definitely need gastroenterologists more actively involved. So far, due to the clinical and official settings, many of microbiologists do not have any access to the patients. The data for antibiotic susceptibility tests mainly come from laboratories which are dominated by microbiologists. Thus, as a historic conflict between clinicians and basic medical scientists, lack of connection can result in blind antibiotic prescription by the gastroenterologists. Another evidence for this conflict is that almost none of famous microbiologists are co-authored in recently published guidelines on treatment or diagnosis of the H. pylori. Moreover, the story is exacerbated when the microbiology journals have no scope for publishing such guidelines. This existed, but, unwanted gap deserves an intense attention to improve management of patients carrying H. pylori with resistance to clarithromycin. As we described above, in infectious diseases, treatment is highly recommended based on susceptibility pattern, a fact does not follow in the case of H. pylori. In other words, treatment of H. pylori in many of clinics are based on personal experiences by the gastroenterologists than antibiotic susceptibility tests determined in a microbiology laboratory. With this regard, an incoherent connection between those two populations is a major cause of inappropriate drug prescription ending in increased antibiotic resistance worldwide. Therefore, WHO announced that we are facing with the new generation of resistant H. pylori isolates to clarithromycin which endangers effectiveness of current chemotherapy against the bacterium. By continuing the current situation, the replacement of H. pylori by WHO in a critical level of priority in a ranking of threatening pathogen is not far from the mind. The next uninvestigated part of the problem is a natural persistence of clinicians on the application of susceptibility patterns reported by microbiologists! For example, metronidazole resistance is not under 60% in many of regions worldwide[28-31], but any trials can show intrinsic tendency among the clinicians who aim to use this ineffective drug for eradicating the H. pylori. Taking together, our knowledge about antibiotic resistance has evolved nicely during the relatively short time we treating the H. pylori, however, we need new insight on how to increase the reliability among the clinicians to use susceptibility pattern to efficiently eliminate the bacterium especially in patients at least with severe gastroduodenal disorders. Here for the first time, we called this phenomenon as ‘‘gastroenterologist’s persistence’’ which should be equally investigated as antibiotic resistance. The ability of gastroenterologists to win the game against H. pylori infections is highly being influenced by their collaboration with diagnostic laboratories to apply susceptibility patterns before any prescription. Therefore, two major targets should be considered, (1) antibiotic resistance; and (2) clinician’s persistence. Invasive nature of gastroscopy is a considerable factor that influence on rare access to culture-based information on susceptibility tests. Defeating most of the recommended guidelines to eliminate the H. pylori can be a major output of neglecting the clinician’s persistence.
CONCLUSION
Nowadays, therapeutic failures in anti-H. pylori regimens has emerged as major concern for both gastroenterologists and microbiologists. The recent announcement by WHO should be considered as an alarming sound that indicates on emergence of clarithromycin-resistant strains causing global H. pylori treatment failure. Since clarithromycin has a critical role in the success of therapeutic regimens against the H. pylori, the spread of its resistant strains can easily hamper our attempts to eradicate this microbe. Conclusively, it is not the exaggeration to consider this antibiotic as the main drug in the treatment of H. pylori. We need to repeat that all records insisting on using the clarithromycin before recommending as anti-H. pylori agent should be considered as serious alarming item. Although the ideal and effective therapy to eliminate the H. pylori is not available, but optimizing the current formulations especially, cautious application of clarithromycin in regions with resistance rate > 20% is a likely successful approach. New research direction to produce and suggest novel antibiotics are welcomed to compensate the lacking in antimicrobial agents listed as therapeutic options. In future, application of MALDI-TOF as a novel method can be used directly to detect mutations from biopsy sample; a suggestion which is not far away. To my knowledge, this is one the first paper that pinpoints the gap between gastroenterologists and microbiologists following nomination for H. pylori as high priority pathogen by WHO. To be honest, although the persistence of gastroenterologists is a critical factor to increase antibiotic resistance among H. pylori strains, but, difficulties in bacterial culture, time consuming procedure of culture and high cost for rapid detection of resistance are the list which belongs to another side of involving individuals. Finally, closer collaboration between two important partners (gastroenterologists and microbiologists) in management of H. pylori infection may hopefully trigger an era to remedy current crisis in clarithromycin resistance, a later gastric cancer can be practically preventable.
Footnotes
Manuscript source: Invited manuscript
Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of origin: Iran
Peer-review report classification
Grade A (Excellent): A
Grade B (Very good): B, B
Grade C (Good): C, C
Grade D (Fair): D
Grade E (Poor): 0
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Peer-review started: July 4, 2017
First decision: July 28, 2017
Article in press: August 25, 2017
P- Reviewer: Adachi Y, Emara MH, Kocazeybek B, Kreisel W, Lei YC, Yamaoka Y S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: A
E- Editor: Ma YJ
References
- 1.Abadi AT, Ierardi E, Lee YY. Why do we still have Helicobacter Pylori in our Stomachs. Malays J Med Sci. 2015;22:70–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yamaoka Y, Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori virulence and cancer pathogenesis. Future Oncol. 2014;10:1487–1500. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Graham DY. History of Helicobacter pylori, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5191–5204. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, Bazzoli F, Gasbarrini A, Atherton J, Graham DY, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report. Gut. 2017;66:6–30. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’morain CA, Atherton J, Axon AT, Bazzoli F, Gensini GF, Gisbert JP, Graham DY, Rokkas T. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2012;61:646–664. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Howden CW, Hunt RH. Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Ad Hoc Committee on Practice Parameters of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:2330–2338. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00684.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Asaka M, Kato M, Takahashi S, Fukuda Y, Sugiyama T, Ota H, Uemura N, Murakami K, Satoh K, Sugano K; Japanese Society for Helicobacter Research. Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2009 revised edition. Helicobacter. 2010;15:1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2009.00738.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fock KM, Katelaris P, Sugano K, Ang TL, Hunt R, Talley NJ, Lam SK, Xiao SD, Tan HJ, Wu CY, et al. Second Asia-Pacific Consensus Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1587–1600. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05982.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, Hunt R, Rokkas T, Vakil N, Kuipers EJ. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007;56:772–781. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.101634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hunt RH, Xiao SD, Megraud F, Leon-Barua R, Bazzoli F, van der Merwe S, Vaz Coelho LG, Fock M, Fedail S, Cohen H, et al. Helicobacter pylori in developing countries. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guideline. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011;20:299–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Duvnjak M, Lerotić I. Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Dyspepsia in Clinical Practice: Springer; 2011. pp. 89–124. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kraft M, Cassell GH, Pak J, Martin RJ. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in asthma: effect of clarithromycin. Chest. 2002;121:1782–1788. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Müller O. Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31 Suppl E:137–146. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Versalovic J, Shortridge D, Kibler K, Griffy MV, Beyer J, Flamm RK, Tanaka SK, Graham DY, Go MF. Mutations in 23S rRNA are associated with clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:477–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stone GG, Shortridge D, Versalovic J, Beyer J, Flamm RK, Graham DY, Ghoneim AT, Tanaka SK. A PCR-oligonucleotide ligation assay to determine the prevalence of 23S rRNA gene mutations in clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:712–714. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.3.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abadi AT, Taghvaei T, Ghasemzadeh A, Mobarez AM. High frequency of A2143G mutation in clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates recovered from dyspeptic patients in Iran. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:396–399. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.87181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mégraud F, Lehours P. Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:280–322. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kutschke A, de Jonge BL. Compound efflux in Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:3009–3010. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.3009-3010.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hirata K, Suzuki H, Nishizawa T, Tsugawa H, Muraoka H, Saito Y, Matsuzaki J, Hibi T. Contribution of efflux pumps to clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25 Suppl 1:S75–S79. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bina JE, Alm RA, Uria-Nickelsen M, Thomas SR, Trust TJ, Hancock RE. Helicobacter pylori uptake and efflux: basis for intrinsic susceptibility to antibiotics in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:248–254. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.2.248-254.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maurin M. Real-time PCR as a diagnostic tool for bacterial diseases. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012;12:731–754. doi: 10.1586/erm.12.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Owen RJ. Molecular testing for antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Gut. 2002;50:285–289. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Binh TT, Shiota S, Suzuki R, Matsuda M, Trang TT, Kwon DH, Iwatani S, Yamaoka Y. Discovery of novel mutations for clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori by using next-generation sequencing. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1796–1803. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oleastro M, Ménard A, Santos A, Lamouliatte H, Monteiro L, Barthélémy P, Mégraud F. Real-time PCR assay for rapid and accurate detection of point mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin in Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:397–402. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.397-402.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ménard A, Santos A, Mégraud F, Oleastro M. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism can also detect point mutation A2142C in the 23S rRNA gene, associated with Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1156–1157. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1156-1157.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cerqueira L, Fernandes RM, Ferreira RM, Carneiro F, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Figueiredo C, Keevil CW, Azevedo NF, Vieira MJ. PNA-FISH as a new diagnostic method for the determination of clarithromycin resistance of Helicobacter pylori. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vega AE, Alarcón T, Domingo D, López-Brea M. Detection of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in frozen gastric biopsies from pediatric patients by a commercially available fluorescent in situ hybridization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;59:421–423. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shiota S, Reddy R, Alsarraj A, El-Serag HB, Graham DY. Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Among Male United States Veterans. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1616–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Su P, Li Y, Li H, Zhang J, Lin L, Wang Q, Guo F, Ji Z, Mao J, Tang W, et al. Antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori isolated in the Southeast Coastal Region of China. Helicobacter. 2013;18:274–279. doi: 10.1111/hel.12046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee JW, Kim N, Kim JM, Nam RH, Chang H, Kim JY, Shin CM, Park YS, Lee DH, Jung HC. Prevalence of primary and secondary antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Korea from 2003 through 2012. Helicobacter. 2013;18:206–214. doi: 10.1111/hel.12031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abadi AT, Taghvaei T, Mobarez AM, Carpenter BM, Merrell DS. Frequency of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from the northern population of Iran. J Microbiol. 2011;49:987–993. doi: 10.1007/s12275-011-1170-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]