Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Oct 16;7:13240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12753-1

Role of Mast Cells in clearance of Leishmania through extracellular trap formation

Nilofer Naqvi 1, Kavita Ahuja 2,3, Angamuthu Selvapandiyan 2, Ranadhir Dey 4, Hira Nakhasi 4, Niti Puri 1,
PMCID: PMC5643406  PMID: 29038500

Abstract

Mast Cells (MCs) are one of the first immune cells encountered by invading pathogens. Their presence in large numbers in the superficial dermis, where Leishmania is encountered, suggests that they may play a critical role in immune responses to Leishmania. In this study the interactions of Leishmania donovani, the causative agent of visceral Leishmaniasis, and Leishmania tropica, the causative agent of cutaneous Leishmaniasis with MCs were studied. Co-culture of Leishmania with Peritoneal Mast Cells (PMCs) from BALB/c mice and Rat Basophilic Leukaemia (RBL-2H3) MCs led to significant killing of L. tropica and to a lesser extent of L. donovani. Also, while there was significant uptake of L. tropica by MCs, L. donovani was not phagocytosed. There was significant generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) by MCs on co-culture with these species of Leishmania which may contribute to their clearance. Interactions of MCs with Leishmania led to generation of MC extracellular traps comprising of DNA, histones and tryptase probably to ensnare these pathogens. These results clearly establish that MCs may contribute to host defences to Leishmania in a differential manner, by actively taking up these pathogens, and also by mounting effector responses for their clearance by extracellular means.

Introduction

Mast Cells (MCs) are specialized secretory cells of hematopoietic origin that play a role in innate and adaptive defence to pathogens and in various inflammatory responses. They are found in large numbers in skin, and mucosal lining, and may represent one of the first immune cells encountered by invading pathogens1. MCs have been suggested to contribute to protective immunity against bacterial, nonbacterial, and even parasitic pathogens2. However, few studies have attempted to provide direct evidence for MC-dependent protective effects in settings of parasite infections that originate in the skin. Thus, the role of MCs as players in anti-parasitic immunity remains to be characterized in detail.

Parasites of the genus Leishmania, which are endemic in tropical and subtropical regions around the world, cause a spectrum of diseases ranging from self-healing ulcers to disseminated and often fatal infections, depending on the species involved and on the host immune response. Clinical manifestations of Leishmaniasis include cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL), muco-cutaneous Leishmaniasis (MCL), visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) and post-kala-azar dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL). Leishmania donovani, the species that causes VL, disseminates to spleen, liver and bone marrow (BM), whereas L. major and L. tropica that cause CL, remain in the cutaneous lesion and the draining lymph node. 12 million people are affected worldwide by Leishmaniasis and in the Indian subcontinent, about 200 million people are estimated to be at risk of developing VL; this region harbours an estimated 67% of the global VL disease burden3,4,5. So far no vaccine and also very limited therapeutic avenues are available to control Leishmaniasis.

In recent years, a lot of research effort has focused on interaction of the innate immune system with Leishmania to enable development of better strategies for vaccine and drug development against Leishmaniasis. These studies of host-pathogen interactions have revealed that Leishmania parasites have adapted to hide within different cell types to evade the host immune response. Predominantly myeloid cells harbour this obligatory intracellular parasite6. Macrophages are crucial for parasite survival, as well as for its elimination7. One model called for a ‘Trojan horse’ function of neutrophils whereby apoptotic neutrophils carrying Leishmania parasites are transferred to macrophages8.

A large numbers of MCs are found in the skin, predominantly in the superficial dermis9, where Leishmania is encountered after the bite of infected sand flies and their role in Leishmania major and L. donovani mediated immune responses has been shown. Specifically, L. major has been described to activate MCs to induce the release of proinflammatory mediators, and to be phagocytosed by MCs. There is also evidence of their role in establishment of a Th2 response during L. major infection10. Finally, it has been shown that dermal MCs are required for the recruitment of macrophages during cutaneous granuloma formation, a hallmark feature of parasite induced inflammatory responses11. In contrast, substantial inhibition of IL-10, IL-4, and IL-13 expression and the absence of degranulated MCs within the ears of mice immunized with L. donovani centrin gene deleted live attenuated vaccine candidate and challenged with virulent wild type parasites, suggested a controlled anti-inflammatory response12. As thus observed a distinct dichotomy of opinions exists as to whether MCs can either help or not in the pathogen replication. We, therefore, set out to dissect through this study, the very initial events when MCs encounter Leishmania parasites in the in vitro. It is important to investigate the role of MCs in Leishmaniasis as: firstly, MCs are markedly more numerous at skin regions that are often infected by Leishmania spp.9. Secondly, MCs are critically involved in the induction of innate immune responses; and previous studies have suggested that MCs are also involved in the regulation of immunity against various Leishmania spp.10,12,13. So, the aim of the present study was to determine if MCs are involved in direct clearance of L. donovani, and L. tropica [the two Leishmania spp. that cause very different disease outcomes] promastigotes, by intracellular or extracellular mechanisms, and also to compare the response of MCs to these two Leishmania spp. The differential responses of MCs to the two Leishmania spp. may have some bearing on their disease outcomes.

Results

Co-culture with MCs reduces the recovery and viability of L. donovani and L. tropica (promastigotes) in vitro

Since large numbers of MCs are found in the superficial dermis9, where Leishmania is encountered after the bite of infected sand flies, they may have an important role in Leishmaniasis. To directly explore the interaction of Leishmania with MCs, promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani obtained from Indian clinical isolates were coincubated with Peritoneal Mast Cells (PMCs) and RBL MCs at multiplicity of infection (MOI) 1:10 for indicated time points and their recoveries and viability were calculated. For isolation of pure population of PMCs, cells of peritoneal lavage were double stained with CD117 APC and CD45R and through sorter 2% PMCs were isolated (Fig. 1a). These PMCs were co-cultured with L. tropica and L. donovani for 24 h and viability which was done through MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay has reduced to 86.44 ± 2.5% in case of L. tropica whereas viability has reduced to 91 ± 1% in case of L. donovani (Fig. 1b and c). This reduction in viability by MTT was significant. After 24 h in culture, the recoveries of viable promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani, when cultured alone were 89.3 ± 1.8% and 93.3 ± 2.6% respectively (Fig. 1d and e). There was a marked decrease in the recovery of viable promastigotes of L. tropica (45.7 ± 2.3% recovery) when co cultured with RBL MCs, and a small but significant decrease in the recovery of viable promastigotes of L. donovani (82.3 ± 2.5% recovery) in presence of MCs (Fig. 1d and e). Further to confirm that the death of promastigotes is because of direct contact with MCs and not due to some soluble mediator released by MCs, the respective promastigotes and MCs were co-cultured in transwell system and recoveries of viable promastigotes calculated. Recoveries of promastigotes alone in the transwells were similar as before. L. tropica was 90.5 ± 2.6% and L. donovani was 91.2 ± 2.4%. But recovery of viable promastigotes of L. tropica with MCs in the transwell system increased to 81.24 ± 1.2%. The recovery of L. tropica has significantly reduced from 89.3 ± 1.8% of parasite alone in transwell system to 81.24 ± 1.2% of the parasite along with MCs in nontranswell system. Also, the recovery of viable promastigotes of L. donovani co-cultured with MCs in the transwell system was same as recovery of L. donovani alone. Hence, promastigotes from both spp. showed better recoveries when co-cultured with MCs in the transwell system (Fig. 1d and e). As promastigotes of Leishmania showed reduced viability on co-culture with MCs for 24 h, Phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure on the external leaflet of the plasma membrane of promastigotes was checked to look for signs of death by apoptosis. After 24 h of coculture with RBL MCs, 80.8 ± 2.4% of promastigotes of L. tropica, and 25.2 ± 1.6% of promastigotes of L. donovani showed binding to Annexin V, confirming PS externalization (Fig. 1f).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cell death of promastigotes on co-culture with MCs. PMCs were isolated from Peritoneal lavage of female BALB/c mice and were sorted through flowcytometer (Fig. 1a). PMCs were co-cultured with L. tropica and L. donovani in 96 well plate for 24 h at MOI (1:10). MTT assay was done. The Y-axis represents the relative amount of viable cells after normalization to the Leishmania control (Fig. 1b and c). 0.1 × 106 MCs were seeded in 48 well cell culture plate and cultured overnight in CO2 incubator. L. donovani and L. tropica were added at MOI 1:10. After indicated time points parasites were removed cell viability was counted using trypan blue exclusion method n = 3. Panel d and e represent % cell viability of L. tropica and L. donovani on co-culture with MCs as well as % cell viability of L. tropica and L. donovani on co-culture with MCs in transwell system respectively. 0.1 million cells were seeded in 48 well cell culture plate. Leishmania were syringe separated and added at MOI 1:10 for 24 h. Parasites were harvested washed followed by adding 50 μl of Annexin Binding Buffer and were processed as mentioned in materials and methods. Representative histograms (solid black line) in panels show Annexin APC positive cells in comparison to unstained (filled grey)(Fig. 1f). Each point represents mean ± SEM of values obtained from three independent assays.

MCs show significant uptake of L. tropica but not L. donovani in vitro

Since there was an increase in recovery of promastigotes from both Leishmania spp. in the transwell system in comparison to non transwell normal co-cultures, and MCs are known to internalise various pathogens1417, the uptake of promastigotes by RBL MCs was studied. To monitor this uptake by flow cytometry or immunofluorescence microscopy, promastigotes of Leishmania spp. were labelled with Carboxyfluorescein N-succinimidyl ester (CFSE), and labelling was confirmed by flow cytometry. Promastigotes from both Leishmania spp. showed greater than 90% CFSE labelling (Fig. 1a). When these CFSE labelled promastigotes were co-cultured with MCs, 7.2% ± 2.2% and 11.7% ± 2.7% MCs were found to be positive for CFSE labelled L. tropica at 18 h and 24 h respectively. But no uptake of CFSE labelled L. donovani by MCs was seen at these time points (Table 1). Confocal microscopy also confirmed L. tropica being taken up by MCs after 24 h of co-culture (Fig. 2b), and no uptake of CFSE labelled L. donovani by MCs at any time point (Fig. 2c). Further to confirm that the reduction in live cell recoveries of promastigotes is because of phagocytosis by MCs, we pre-treated MCs with Cytochalasin D, a known inhibitor of actin polymerization, and therefore phagocytosis18, and co-cultured with L. tropica and calculated viability. The viability of promastigotes of L. tropica at 24 h of co-culture with Cytochalasin D treated MCs was found to be 65.3% ± 4%. Hence the viability still shows a statistically significant decrease from cell viability of promastigotes cultured alone, but a statistically significant increase from viability obtained on co-culture of promastigotes with untreated MCs (Fig. 2d). On the other hand when promastigotes of L. donovani were cocultured with Cytochalasin D treated MCs, no change in viable cell recoveries was obtained in comparison to recovery obtained after co-culture with untreated MCs (Fig. 2d). These results again confirm phagocytosis of promastigotes of L. tropica but not of L. donovani by MCs. Further, since phagocytosis is only partially responsible for reduction in recoveries, other non-phagocytic pathways may also be involved in clearance of Leishmania by MCs.

Table 1.

Uptake of Leishmania by Mast Cells

MCs cocultured with the Leishmania Time (h) Leishmania Uptake in MCs (% Gated) Leishmania Uptake in (MFI)
Mast Cells alone 18 1.16 ± 1.2 4.9 ± 2.1
24 1.8 ± 0.8 4.8 ± 1.6
L. tropica 18 7.2 ± 2.2* 18.5 ± 2.3*
24 11.7 ± 2.7* 23.8 ± 3.4*
L. donovoni 18 1.9 ± 2.6 5.2 ± 2.3
24 1.8 ± 3.8 5.1 ± 3.3

0.1 million cells suspended in 1 ml medium were cultured in 48 well plate overnight for adherence and were incubated with late log CFSE labelled Leishmania at MOI 1:10 for 18 h and 24 h at 37 °C in CO2 incubator followed by harvesting and running through flow cytometer. Each value shown is Leishmania uptake in terms of % of total represented as mean ± SEM of values obtained from three independent assays.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Uptake of Leishmania by RBL MCs. Promastigotes were labelled with CFSE and their stability was checked after 24 h as shown in panel a. CFSE labelled promastigotes were syringe separated and incubated with overnight cultured MCs at an MOI 1:10 in 48 well cell culture plate and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. RBL-2H3 were cultured on coverslips overnight. Cells were incubated with CFSE labeled L. tropica and L. donovani for 24 h and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. Cells were examined using a confocal laser scanning microscope under same settings as shown in Fig. 2b and c for L. tropica and L. donovani respectively (magnification 100X). Scale bar represents 5 µm. Panel d represents % cell viability of L. tropica on co-culture with MCs as well as % cell viability of L. tropica on co-culture with MCs treated with Cytochalasin D. Panel e represents co-culture of L. donovani on co-culture with MCs as well as % cell viability of L. donovani on co-culture with MCs treated with Cytochalasin D. Each point represents mean ± SEM of values obtained from three independent assays.

Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and mediator release from MCs in response to direct interaction with promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani

There are reports of killing of Leishmania by ROS1922. Since we observed cell death in promastigotes we further checked whether ROS are generated in MCs upon co-culture with the promastigotes. ROS generation in control and Leishmania co-cultured RBL MCs were estimated by staining MCs with CMH2DCFDA. In untreated controls, 4.33 + 1.2% RBL MCs showed positive ROS generation. We found significantly more ROS generation in MCs upon co-culture with promastigotes of both species compared to their respective controls (Fig. 3a). Co-culture of L. tropica at MOI 1:10 after 24 h resulted in 17.15% ± 2.4% cells generating ROS whereas using transwell system ROS generation was 8.79% ± 2.2%. Co-culture of L. donovani at MOI 1:10 after 24 h resulted in 26.43% ± 1.8% MCs generating ROS whereas using transwell system ROS generation was 4.16% ± 3.6%. To further determine the functional significance of ROS production catalase was used. Catalase converts hydrogen peroxide into H2O and O2 and also reduced NET formation in response to PMA activation23. So MCs were co-cultured with L. tropica and L. donovani in 96 well cell culture plate in the presence or absence of catalase. By MTT assay the absorbance at 595 nm of L. tropica co-cultured without or with MCs was 0.48 ± 0.03 and 0.12 ± 0.01 respectively as shown in Fig. 3b. Similarly, absorbance at 595 nm of L. donovani co-cultured with or without MCs was 0.45 ± 0.02 and 0.23 ± 0.025 respectively (Fig. 3c). Absorbance at 595 nm of L. tropica and L. donovani when co-cultured with MCs in the presence of catalase was around 0.34 ± 0.015 and 0.33 ± 0.023 respectively (Fig. 3b and c). This increase in OD units in both L. tropica and L. donovani is statistically significant as shown in Fig. 3b and c. Similar studies were also carried out with PMCs. The absorbance at 595 nm of L. tropica co-cultured without or with PMCs was around 0.51 ± 0.01 and 0.59 ± 0.014respectively (Fig. 3d). Similarly, absorbance at 595 nm of L. donovani co-cultured with or without PMCs was around 0.52 ± 0.007 and 0.57 ± 0.016 respectively (Fig. 3e). Absorbance at 595 nm of L. tropica and L. donovani when co-cultured with PMCs in the presence of catalase was around 0.55 ± 0.01 and 0.55 ± 0.012 respectively. This increase in OD units in both L. tropica and L. donovani is statistically significant (Fig. 3d and e). Since there are also reports of release of MC mediators upon interaction with few species of Leishmania 10, we checked the release of β-hexosaminidase, as an indicator of MC mediator release on co-culture of both the species. We found low but statistically significant release of β-hexosaminidase by MCs on co-culture with L. tropica and L. donovani compared to resting MCs alone (Fig. 3f and g).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Generation of ROS and release of mediators by RBL MCs on co-culture of promastigotes. 0.3 × 106 MCs were seeded in 24 well cell culture plate and L. donovani and L. tropica were added at MOI 1:10 and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. Representative histograms (solid black line) in panels show CMH2DCFDA stained positive cells in comparison to unstained (filled grey). ROS generation in RBL MCs by Leishmania is shown in panel A, n = 3. RBL MCs (1 × 104 cells/well) in 100 µl medium were cultured in a 96-well plate at 37 °C, and co-cultured with promastigotes alone as well as with catalase for 24 h. Cells treated with medium only served as a negative control group. After removing the supernatant of each well and transferring to another 96-well plate 20 µl of MTT solution was then introduced and then processed as discussed in materials and methods. Panel b and c represent effect of catalase on viability of L. tropica and L. donovani, n = 3. PMCs were cocultured with promastigotes alone as well as with catalase for 24 h. MTT assay was done to assess the viability of promastigotes. Panel d and e represent effect of catalase on viability of L. tropica and L. donovani, n = 3. 0.1 × 106 cells suspended in 1.0 ml medium were co-cultured with 1:10 MOI L. tropica and L. donovani for 1 h and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. Panel D and E represent β-hexosaminidase release (% of total) by MCs on co-culture with L.tropica and L. donovani respectively, n = 5.

Mast cell death by Etosis and release of mast cell extracellular traps (MCETs) on interaction with L. tropica and L. donovani

Another mechanism of extracellular killing of pathogens by immune cells is by formation of extracellular traps (ETs)24. For extracellular trap formation, MCs are known to die by ETosis and release DNA15,2528. So we checked whether the MCs die on co-culture with promastigotes of these Leishmania species. In control RBL MCs the viability was around 96.2% ± 3% at 18 h and 90.5% ± 2.5% at 24 h. The viability of MCs upon co-culture with promastigotes of L. tropica fell to 89.5% ± 2.5% at 18 h and 79.3% ± 3.5% at 24 h which is a statistically significant decrease compared to control (Fig. 4a). The viability of MCs upon co-culture with promastigotes of L. donovani was also 73.6% ± 5% at 24 h which is a statistically significant decrease compared to control (Fig. 4a). There was a concomitant decrease in the recovery of viable MCs at 24 h of co-culture with promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani, respectively (Fig. 4b). Further, to confirm if MC death was by ETosis, we looked for the release of extracellular DNA by Sytox Green staining after co-culturing MCs with the promastigotes of both species. MCs cultured alone showed very low levels of extracellular DNA (2.3% ± 1.5% at 18 h and 3.2% ± 2.3% at 24 h). Significantly higher release of DNA was seen by MCs on co-culture with L. tropica for 18 h (6.5% ± 0.5%), and 24 h (21.6% ± 1.2%) respectively (Fig. 4c), and with L. donovani for 24 h (11.7% ± 0.6%).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cell viability of RBL MCs upon interaction with L. tropica and L. donovani. 0.1 × 106 MCs were seeded in 48 well cell culture plate and L. tropica and L. donovani were added at MOI 1:10 and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. Panel a represent recovery of viable MCs (% of total) on coculture with L. tropica and L. donovani. Panel b represents recovery of live MCs (millions) on coculture with L. tropica and L. donovani. Panel c represent DNA release in a time and dose-dependent manner as determined with Sytox green. The Y-axis represents the percentage of DNA release after normalization to the mast cell lysis control. Each point represents mean ± SEM of values obtained from three independent assays.

Visualization of mast cell extracellular traps containing histones and tryptase in response to L. tropica and L. donovani

As we saw MCs die by releasing DNA on infection with promastigotes of these Leishmania species, we wanted to visualize this phenomenon by microscopy. RBL MCs cultured alone, or co-cultured with promastigotes of L. tropica or L. donovani were fixed, their DNA stained with DAPI (4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), and visualized by confocal microscope. MCs cultured alone showed DNA staining indicating compact intact chromatin in nuclei, MCs co-cultured with Leishmania promastigotes on the other hand showed disrupted/disintegrated chromatin with long extensions as expected in case of MCETs (Fig. 5a). MCs treated similarly were also examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy to confirm release of DNA on infection by promastigotes of these Leishmania species. Figure 5b shows no extension formation or release of DNA by non-co-cultured MCs (Fig. 5b, left panel), whereas in MCs co-cultured with L. donovani (Fig. 5b, right panel) and L. tropica (Fig. 5b, middle panel) we see some extensions of around 0.1 µm diameter. These extensions may be DNA. Images in row 2 are 10000X magnified images and images in row 1 are 2000X magnified images (at least 10 images were visualized in each case). In a few images no L. tropica or 1 ± 1 is seen in total 10 images whereas, 20 ± 5 L. donovani are seen in total 10 images. Both these microscopic studies reveal the formation of more extensive chromatin extensions or traps by MCs in response to L. donovani in comparison to the ones in response to L. tropica.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Visualization of Mast Cell Extracellular Traps. RBL MCs cultured on a cover glass slip for overnight incubated with promastigotes for 24 h at an MOI of 1:10 in RBL complete medium. Cells were washed with PBS thrice, fixed with methanol mounted in medium having DAPI (blue) and visualised under confocal laser scanning microscope as shown in Fig. 5a. Scale bar is 10 µm and magnification is 100X, n = 3. CS refers to Chromatin Structure. 2.5 × 106 MCs were seeded in 6 well plate for overnight and L. donovani and L. tropica were added at MOI 1:10. After 24 h parasites were removed cells were harvested and were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde for 2 h and were processed for Scanning Electron Microscopy. n = 3. Scale bar in top panel of 5b is 10 µm and magnification is 2000X and scale bar in bottom panel of 5b is 2 µm and magnification is 10000X, n = 3. White arrows show Leishmania and black arrow could be DNA fibre.

MCETs comprise of DNA along with histones and tryptase15,2528. RBL MCs were seeded on cover slides and co-cultured with CFSE labelled promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani for 24 h, thereafter DNA was visualized by DAPI staining, tryptase and histones by staining with fluorescently tagged specific antibodies. As is seen in Figs 6 and 7, blue coloured DAPI stained DNA with red coloured tryptase or histone are visible in the extracellular regions. Tryptase staining is extensive in cytosol region of MCs. The images in the insets are further zoomed which depicts co-localized histone (red), DNA (blue) and L. tropica (green) in the extracellular regions (Fig. 6a). Similar staining patterns are also seen in the extracellular areas in case of co-culture of MCs with promastigotes of L. donovani (Fig. 7). Thus, fluorescence images depict release of tryptase (red), histone (red), and DNA (blue) with extracellular trapped promastigotes of L. tropica (green) and L. donovani (green) (Figs 6 and 7). The number of promastigotes of L. donovani in the extracellular regions are much more than the number of promastigotes of L. tropica entrapped in MCETs in all the fields observed.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Immunostaining of MCETs with histone and tryptase on in vitro intreraction of RBL MCs with L. tropica. Cells cultured on a cover glass slip for overnight incubated with L. tropica (green) for 24 h at an MOI of 1:10 in RBL complete medium and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. Panel a represent staining with anti – histone and panel b represent staining with anti – tryptase and were visualized under confocal microscope at 60X. Scale bar is 50 μm, n = 3.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Immunostaining of MCETs with histone and tryptase on in vitro interaction of RBL MCs with L. donovani. Cells cultured on a cover glass slip for overnight incubated with L. donovani (green) for 24 h at an MOI of 1:10 in RBL medium and were processed as discussed in materials and methods. Panel a represent staining with anti – histone and panel b represent staining with anti – tryptase and were visualized under confocal microscopre at 60X. Scale bar is 50 μm, n = 3.

Evidence of extracellular killing of L. tropica and L. donovani by Mast Cell Extracellular Traps

The results so far indicated release of DNA with histones and tryptase forming MCETs in response to promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani. Further to confirm that the MCETs had a role in killing of these promastigotes it was necessary to check whether disrupting DNA could affect the viability of promastigotes. The cells in co-culture were treated with DNase and the viability of promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani showed a significant increase from 45.7% ± 2.3% to 66.7% ± 4.4%, and 82.43% ± 1.2% to 90.16% ± 2.4%, respectively (Fig. 8a and b). So we conclude that MCET formation is important for killing of promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani.Similarly, when PMCs were co-cultured with L. tropica and L. donovani for 24 h viability by MTT assay was reduced to 86.44 ± 2.5% in case of L. tropica whereas viability was reduced to 91 ± 1% in case of L. donovani as shown in Figs 8c and 1d. Further, to confirm the similar effector mechanisms are operating in PMCs as well, DNase treatment was carried out during PMC Leishmania co-culture. The viability by MTT assay has significantly increased from 86.44 ± 2.5% to 96 ± 0.8% in case of L. tropica and the viability has also increased significantly from 91 ± 1% to 94 ± 1.2% in case of L. donovani (Fig. 8c and d). So we conclude that MCET formation is important for killing of promastigotes of L. tropica and L. donovani.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Evidence of extracellular killing of L. tropica and L. donovani by Mast Cell Extracellular Traps. 0.1 × 106 MCs were seeded in 48 well cell culture plate and cultured overnight in CO2 incubator. Panel 8a and 8b represent recovery of RBL MCs (% of total) by trypan blue on co-culture with L. tropica and L. donovani pretreated with DNase. Panel 8c and 8d represent recovery of PMCs (% of total) by MTT assay co-culture with L. tropica and L. donovani pretreated with DNase. Each point represents mean ± SEM of values obtained from three independent assays.

Discussion

The initial interactions between a pathogen and host set the stage for the development of long-term immunity. Among the earliest interactions of a pathogen with the immune system will be those involving MCs as they are part of the resident cells at the interface of the host and its environment1. The vital role of MCs in triggering the innate immune response has been demonstrated following infections with many bacterial and nonbacterial pathogens, especially intestinal parasites2. Only one study so far has looked at the direct interaction between Leishmania promastigotes and MCs, and also the specific MC effector responses10. Specific genetic deletion of mast cells in vivo had different impact on the course of infection with various species of Leishmania9,29. There are reports stating L. major-infected MC-deficient Kit(W)/Kit(W-v) mice developed larger skin lesions than did normal Kit+/+ mice9 whereas C57BL/6 Cpa Cre or BALB/c Cpa Ce had no effect when infected with L. major 29. Others have focused more on recruitment of other cells and inflammatory responses in MC deficient mice2. As the role of MCs in Leishmania infection is not clear, we therefore, explored the very initial events when MCs encounter Leishmania parasites in the in vitro conditions.

When L. tropica and L. donovani were co-cultured with PMCs of BALB/c mice, a strain susceptible to leishmaniasis30, a reduction in their viabilities was observed. Similar results were obtained on their co-culture with RBL-2H3, a rodent mast cell line that has been extensively used to study MC biology in general and MC-pathogen interactions in particular17,3134. There are reports suggesting role of MCs in infection with L. major and L. donovani in rats35,36. We therefore decided to study the direct interaction of RBL MCs with L. tropica and L. donovani, as an in vitro model to study interaction as would happen in skin just after sand fly bite. Significant decrease was seen in viability of both strains more specifically L. tropica, on co-culture with MCs. By using transwell during co-culture studies, we found significant increase in viability of L. tropica, as well as L. donovani. This indicated that direct cell-cell contact between MCs, and promastigotes of both Leishmania species was required for the observed killing of Leishmania promastigotes. Compared to L. tropica, L. donovani is more viable on co-culture with MCs in 24 h. Moreover, the recovery of L. tropica was significantly reduced even in transwell system with MCs. This reduction may be due to some soluble mediators. Previous knockout studies with mice have shown that TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4 and TLR9 may be important for cytokine response, and other effects in response to Leishmania infection3739. Also, in macrophages, the complement receptors, fibronectin receptor, and the mannose-fucose receptor (MR) on the surface of macrophages play important roles in promastigote attachment40. Since all these receptors are expressed on MCs as well, they may be involved in direct interaction, and signalling involved in MC response to Leishmania.

Killing of Leishmania promastigotes by MCs can either be by phagocytosis or by extracellular means by mediator release or Etosis. MCs have been shown to internalise pathogens causing reduction in viability which was dependent on ROS41. By our flow cytometric, and microscopic studies with CFSE-labelled promastigotes, a significant phagocytosis of L. tropica but not of L. donovani by MCs was observed. Cytochalasin D treatment of MCs before co-culture caused a significant increase in cell viability of L. tropica in presence of MCs. This validates, that reduction in viable number of promastigotes of L. tropica may partially be through phagocytosis by MCs. A previous study has reported that Bone Marrow Derived Mast Cells (BMMCs) can bind and internalise promastigotes of L. major and L. infantum 10. Once inside the MCs, the promastigotes may be killed by ROS generated inside host MCs. We did observe significant ROS production in co-cultured MCs, and also apoptosis of extracellular Leishmania parasites, confirmed by Annexin V binding assay. ROS from macrophages has been shown to be required for killing of promastigotes of L. amazonensis and regulation of inflammatory responses42,43. ROS has also been shown to precipitate apoptosis of the L. donovani parasites44. Treatment of catalase increased viability of L.tropica and L. donovani in co-culture studies with PMCs as well as RBL-2H3. As use of transwell system greatly reduced ROS production, we can conclude that direct interaction between cells is required and there does not seem to be much contribution of exosomes from Leishmania to this process.

One interesting observation of our study is that MCs are unable to phagocytose promastigotes of L. donovani, but still co-culture with these promastigotes leads to ROS production in MCs. Previous study with neutrophils also report that uptake of L. donovani by neutrophils was an infrequent event45. Since MCs are not able to take up L. donovani and their viability was unaffected by Cytochalasin D treatment of MCs we can rule out the intracellular killing mechanisms. We saw generation of significant amounts of ROS and release of β-hexosaminidase indicating degranulation. This can also be the reason of reduction in viability of L. donovani. We have observed release of β-hexosaminidase during initial hour of interaction with L. tropica and L. donovani. There are earlier reports also which depict that infection with live, virulent promastigotes leads to the release of preformed β-hexosaminidase and TNF-α and de novo synthesis of TNF-α in BMMCs10.

There are reports of extracellular killing of pathogens by MCs by Etosis28. In our study, the interaction of MCs with both Leishmania species led to significant death of MCs and release of DNA as confirmed by fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy, and Sytox green staining. Thus, we found the formation of MCETs in response to both L. tropica and L. donovani. We found reduction in killing of promastigotes of these parasites by DNase treatment on co-culture with PMCs as well as RBL-2H3. Viability of L. tropica increases upto only ~66% on co-culture with MCs along with DNase treatment, which is far less than ~89% when cultured alone, this can be because of phagocytosis or release of toxic antigens of ETosis mainly ROS after digesting the DNA lump, which adversely affects L. tropica survival46. This leads to the conclusion that promastigotes of both species are susceptible to MCETs. Thus MCETs may not only physically restrict them, but also kill them to some extent. Thus, this is the first report showing direct interaction of MCs with either L. donovani or L. tropica by direct contact leading to generation of ROS and MCETs. ROS is required to initiate Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs)46,47, and similar mechanism may also be operational in MCs. Although L. donovani is not phagocytosed by MCs but still causes ROS generation, which may be important for releasing MCETS. In MCs it is possible that MC-specific tryptase and histones, which were both shown to be present in extracellular regions, co-localizing with extracellular DNA and trapped promastigotes by our confocal fluorescence microscopic study, which have also been shown as a component of MCETs previously may have similar antimicrobial functions32.

Numerous factors influence disease severity, but the most important determinant of the form of Leishmaniasis is the species of Leishmania involved. During this study we were also able to compare the interactions of L. tropica and L. donovani with MCs and found that both show a different response. L. tropica shows greater cell death on interaction with MCs, and is susceptible to phagocytosis but L. donovani is not. Secondly, although both Leishmania species seem susceptible to MCETs, as shown by reduction in cell death by DNase treatment, but in all our images of MCETs relatively higher number of promastigotes of L. donovani in comparison to those of L. tropica are seen. These differences could be due to uptake of a proportion of promastigotes of L. tropica by MCs, and in addition, may be L. tropica promastigotes are more susceptible to killing by MCETs, in comparison to those of L. donovani. Previous reports suggest that viability of L. donovani is less affected to NETs due to an abundant surface virulence glycolipid lipophosphoglycan (LPG)48. L. donovani is able to evade killing which is further reconfirming the previously published report45. There is a report stating that promastigotes of L. infantum induce NET release and evade NET-mediated killing through their 3′- nucleotidase/nuclease activity49 and L. donovani also constitutively secretes a nuclease which may help in immune evasion50,51. Earlier studies also suggest that L. donovani exhibits various evasion strategies including alteration of many signalling pathways in macrophages5255. Both species may lead to differential signalling in different host immune cells, as has been shown for L. major and L. donovani effects on macrophage gene regulation in the past56. Differential signalling or different evasion strategies may lead to different pathogenic outcomes.

In conclusion, since MCs are already present in skin and are one of the first immune cells to encounter Leishmania promastigotes, they are the ones that respond early. The formation of MCETs is also seen, and they are able to kill promastigotes to some extent, and definitely able to trap them. So, overall it can be concluded that MCs play a very important direct role in early innate immune response to L. tropica and L. donovani and it will be important to factor in their interaction and effector responses during Leishmania infection for success of any vaccine or therapeutic approach to Leishmaniasis.

Methods

Animals

Inbred BALB/c female mice (8 to12 weeks old) were used to isolate Peritoneal Mast Cells (PMCs). Animals were obtained from Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India and were maintained in the animal house facility at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, India under pathogen free conditions in positive pressure air-conditioned units (25 °C, 50% relative humidity) at a 12 h light and dark cycle. Both water and food were provided ad libitum. Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), JNU (registration no: 19/GO/ReBi/S/99/CPCSEA) approved all experimental protocols (IAEC Code: 13/2013) requiring the use of animals. All experiments were performed under relevant guidelines and regulations.

Isolation and co-culture of PMCs

PMCs were isolated from peritoneal lavage of female BALB/c mice by double staining with APC anti mouse CD117 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and PE anti mouse CD45R (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and sorting through BD FACS Melody. The isolated PMCs were co-cultured in RPMI media supplemented with 20 ng/ml IL-3 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and Stem Cell Factor (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA)57 with L. tropica and L. donovani at MOI 1:10 in 96 well plate.

Maintenance of cell line

The Rat Basophilic Leukaemia (RBL-2H3) mast cell line was a kind gift from Dr. Paul Roche, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. They were maintained in RBL complete medium containing equal parts of Minimum Essential Medium Eagle with Earle’s salts (Gibco, Life technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (Gibco, Life technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and supplemented with 25 mM HEPES (Sigma, MO, USA) (N-[2- 100 hydroxyethyl]piperazine-N0-[2-ethanesulfonic acid]), 50 µg/ml gentamicin sulfate, and 20% heat- inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Gibco, Life technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cell lines were maintained as adherent cultures and subcultured by trypsinization.

Maintenance of promastigotes of Leishmania

Leishmania donovani 1 S (a cloned line from strain 1 S, WHO designation: MHOM/SD/62/1 S), and Leishmania tropica (Wright) Luhe (ATCC 50129) were used in all experiments. The promastigotes were cultured and harvested as described previously58. Briefly, the parasites were grown in vitro in T25 cm2 culture flasks at 26 °C in medium 199 (Sigma, MO, USA) (pH 6.8) having 8 μM 6-Biotin (Sigma, MO, USA), 25 mM Hepes, 0.1 mM adenine (Sigma, MO, USA) in 25 mM Hepes), 8 μM hemin (Sigma, MO, USA) [4 mM stock made in 50% triethanolamine (Sigma, MO, USA)], 100 U/ml each of penicillin G (Gibco, Life technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and streptomycin (Gibco, Life technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum.

CFSE labelling of Leishmania

1 million parasites in late log phase were labelled with 5 μM CFSE (Sigma, MO, USA) for 10 min in water bath at 37 °C. After two washes with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) at 2000g for 5 min at 4 °C parasites were syringe separated with 26 ½ gauge needle. Flow cytometric analysis by a BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer at FL1 channel using Cell Quest software indicated that by using this protocol, more than 95% of the Leishmania parasites were labelled with CFSE.

In vitro co-culture of MCs and Leishmania promastigotes

0.1 million cells suspended in 1 ml medium were cultured in 48 well plate overnight for adherence. They were incubated with late log CFSE labelled Leishmania in 1 ml RBL complete medium at MOI 1:10 (parasites counted using haemocytometer) for 6 h ,18 h and 24 h at 37 °C in CO2 incubator. MCs were washed 3-4 times to remove the uninfected extracellular parasites. The cells were trypsinized and washed with FACS buffer, fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and analyzed with a BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer in FL1 channel using Cell Quest software. For all FACS experiments, relative fluorescence intensity of 10,000 cells was recorded as single parameter histograms (log scale 1024 channels, 4 decades). Similarly in some co-culture experiments, 0.3 million MCs were seeded in the lower chamber of a transwell polystyrene plate (polycarbonate membrane with 0.4-µm pore size, 6.5-mm diameter; (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA) and promastigotes were added to the top chamber of the transwell plate in 24 well plate. In some assays, 0.1 million MCs were pre-treated with Cytochalasin D (Sigma-Aldrich) at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml to inhibit phagocytosis and promastigotes were co-cultured. To disrupt MCETs, MCs were pre-treated with 40 U/ml DNaseI (Sigma-Aldrich) to degrade DNA and then promastigotes were co-cultured. To inhibit ROS 25 U/ml PEG catalase (Sigma Aldrich, India) was used. Viability of MCs as well as promastigotes was assessed through trypan blue staining.

Assessment of apoptosis

MCs were cultured at a concentration of 0.1 million cells/ml in 48 well cell culture plates. After overnight culture, cells were washed with complete medium to remove debris and dead cells. Cells were co-cultured with promastigotes of Leishmania for 24 h and promastigotes were removed. Promastigotes were washed and double stained with 7-amino actinomycin- D (7AAD) (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and annexin V FITC conjugate (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) to assess the apoptotic and necrotic cells using flowcytometry.

Determination of ROS

MCs were cultured at a concentration of 0.3 million cells/ml in 24 well cell culture plates overnight. Adhered MCs were cocultured with promastigotes directly or in transwell washed with complete medium to remove promastigotes, debris and dead cells. These cells were washed, and resuspended in pre-warmed PBS supplemented with 2% FBS and incubated with 5 μM CMH2DCFDA stain (Molecular Probes; Eugene, OR, USA) in the dark for 30 minutes at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator. The oxidative conversion of CMH2DCFDA to its fluorescent product by ROS was measured immediately by BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer in FL1 channel using Cell Quest software.

MTT assay

To determine cell viability the colorimetric MTT metabolic activity assay was used. MCs in 100 µl medium were cultured in a 96-well plate at 37 °C, and co-cultured with promastigotes for 24 h. Cells treated with medium only served as a negative control group. After removing the supernatant of each well and transferring to another 96-well plate 20 µl of MTT solution (Sigma, MO, USA) (5 mg/ml in PBS) were then introduced. After incubation for another 4 h, the resultant formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (100 µl) and the absorbance intensity was measured by a microplate reader (Spectramax M2, USA) at 595 nm. The relative cell viability (%) was expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control cells.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

2.5 × 106 MCs were seeded in 6 well plate for overnight. L. donovani and L. tropica at their stationary stage from culture were syringe separated and were added at MOI 1:10. After 24 h, parasites were removed and the cells were harvested followed by fixing with 2% glutaraldehyde for 1 h and were processed for Scanning Electron Microscope Zeiss EV040 in Advanced Instrumentation Research Facility.

Examination of MCETs

RBL cells were seeded on 10 mm diameter coverslips and kept for adherence at 37 °C in CO2 incubator. CFSE labelled L. tropica and L. donovani were added to the cells at MOI 1:10 for 24 h. The medium was removed and cells were fixed with 2% PFA in PBS for 30 min and excess PFA quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS. The PFA fixed cells were then incubated with 3% normal goat serum (Sigma, MO, USA) for 1 h to prevent nonspecific protein binding. Rabbit Anti-Histone H2A (acetyl K5) antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and Mouse anti-Mast Cell Tryptase antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) diluted in the same buffer were added to the cells, and incubation was conducted for 2 h. After washing, this was followed by 30-min incubation in the presence of secondary goat Abs conjugated to Alexa Fluor 546 (red). Coverslips were mounted in Vecta shield containing DAPI (Vector, Vector Lab. Inc.) to stain nucleus. The images were visualized under Nikon Real Time Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope Model A1R with motorized inverted microscope having Live Cell and Spectral Imaging – Model Ti-E at 60X.

β-hexosaminidase release

RBL-2H3 cells (0.3 × 106) adhered on plate were washed with RPMI (without phenol red) (Sigma, MO, USA) and co-cultured with L. donovani and L. tropica in a final volume of 1.5 ml. Plates were incubated at 37 °C, aliquots of the medium were withdrawn at various times and β-hexosaminidase activity released into the medium was measured. Mock degranulation studies were carried out in parallel by using medium alone59. To determine β-hexosaminidase activity, aliquots of the supernatants and cell lysates were incubated with the substrate solution ((Sigma, MO, USA) 1.3 mg/ml of p-nitrophenyl- N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 4.5) for 90 mins at 37 °C. Absorbance was read at 405 nm and the amount of exocytosis was expressed as the percentage of total β-hexosaminidase activity released in the supernatant.

Quantification of DNA released by MCs

DNA release by MCs was quantified using a Sytox Green-based assay. MCs (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in a 96 well plate wrapped in aluminium foil in the presence of 2.5 μM Sytox Green (Molecular Probes; Eugene, OR, USA) and infected with promastigotes of L. donovani and L. tropica - MOI 1:1, 1:10- or left untreated. The same amount of L. donovani and L. tropica served as viability control whereas triton-lysed MCs served as a reference for 100% DNA release.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism 5 software (San Diego, USA). The significance of any difference was calculated by using Mann-Whitney U Test. *p < 0.05 represent statistically significant difference between the samples.

Acknowledgements

We thank Confocal Fluorescent Microscopy Facility and Scanning Electron Microscopy Facility, AIRF (Advanced instrument research facility), JNU for help with image analysis. We are highly thankful to Dr. Pradeep kumar Rai (Application Scientist, BD-JH FACS Academy, BDB, India) for helping extensively in cell sorting. This work was supported by research grants from Department of Science and Technology (DST) Govt. of India (SR/SO/HS-0122/2009; and DST-PURSE), and University Grants Commission (UGC), India (UPE-II Project ID-54; and UGC-resource networking) to NP. NN was supported by a grant from UGC. K. A. was supported by a grant from DST.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: N.P. Performed the experiments: N.N. and K.A. Analyzed the data: N.P., N.N. and A.S. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: N.P., A.S. and R.D. Wrote the paper: N.P., N.N., A.S. and H.N.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Abraham SN, Malaviya R. Mast cells in infection and immunity. Infection and immunity. 1997;65:3501–3508. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.9.3501-3508.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saha B, Tonkal AM, Croft S, Roy S. Mast cells at the host-pathogen interface: host-protection versus immune evasion in leishmaniasis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;137:19–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02505.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ashford RW. The leishmaniases as emerging and reemerging zoonoses. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1269–1281. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00136-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chappuis F, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:873–882. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alvar J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PloS one. 2012;7:e35671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rittig MG, Bogdan C. Leishmania-host-cell interaction: complexities and alternative views. Parasitol Today. 2000;16:292–297. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(00)01692-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Diefenbach A, et al. Type 1 interferon (IFNalpha/beta) and type 2 nitric oxide synthase regulate the innate immune response to a protozoan parasite. Immunity. 1998;8:77–87. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80460-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van Zandbergen G, et al. Cutting edge: neutrophil granulocyte serves as a vector for Leishmania entry into macrophages. Journal of immunology. 2004;173:6521–6525. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.11.6521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maurer M, et al. Skin mast cells control T cell-dependent host defense in Leishmania major infections. FASEB J. 2006;20:2460–2467. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-5860com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bidri M, et al. Evidence for direct interaction between mast cells and Leishmania parasites. Parasite Immunol. 1997;19:475–483. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1997.d01-153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.von Stebut E, Metz M, Milon G, Knop J, Maurer M. Early macrophage influx to sites of cutaneous granuloma formation is dependent on MIP-1alpha /beta released from neutrophils recruited by mast cell-derived TNFalpha. Blood. 2003;101:210–215. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dey R, et al. Characterization of cross-protection by genetically modified live-attenuated Leishmania donovani parasites against Leishmania mexicana. Journal of immunology. 2014;193:3513–3527. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Romao PR, et al. Mast cell degranulation contributes to susceptibility to Leishmania major. Parasite Immunol. 2009;31:140–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2008.01084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Arock M, et al. Phagocytic and tumor necrosis factor alpha response of human mast cells following exposure to gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Infection and immunity. 1998;66:6030–6034. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.12.6030-6034.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lopes JP, Stylianou M, Nilsson G, Urban CF. Opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans elicits a temporal response in primary human mast cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12287. doi: 10.1038/srep12287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shin JS, Gao Z, Abraham SN. Involvement of cellular caveolae in bacterial entry into mast cells. Science. 2000;289:785–788. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5480.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wesolowski J, Caldwell V, Paumet F. A novel function for SNAP29 (synaptosomal-associated protein of 29 kDa) in mast cell phagocytosis. PloS one. 2012;7:e49886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Casella JF, Flanagan MD, Lin S. Cytochalasin D inhibits actin polymerization and induces depolymerization of actin filaments formed during platelet shape change. Nature. 1981;293:302–305. doi: 10.1038/293302a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Channon JY, Blackwell JM. A study of the sensitivity of Leishmania donovani promastigotes and amastigotes to hydrogen peroxide. I. Differences in sensitivity correlate with parasite-mediated removal of hydrogen peroxide. Parasitology. 1985;91(Pt 2):197–206. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000057309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murray HW. Cell-mediated immune response in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. II. Oxygen-dependent killing of intracellular Leishmania donovani amastigotes. Journal of immunology. 1982;129:351–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pearson RD, Harcus JL, Roberts D, Donowitz GR. Differential survival of Leishmania donovani amastigotes in human monocytes. Journal of immunology. 1983;131:1994–1999. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zarley JH, Britigan BE, Wilson ME. Hydrogen peroxide-mediated toxicity for Leishmania donovani chagasi promastigotes. Role of hydroxyl radical and protection by heat shock. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1991;88:1511–1521. doi: 10.1172/JCI115461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fuchs TA, et al. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;176:231–241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brinkmann V, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303:1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Campillo-Navarro M, et al. Listeria monocytogenes induces mast cell extracellular traps. Immunobiology. 2017;222:432–439. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lin AM, et al. Mast cells and neutrophils release IL-17 through extracellular trap formation in psoriasis. Journal of immunology. 2011;187:490–500. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scheb-Wetzel M, Rohde M, Bravo A, Goldmann O. New insights into the antimicrobial effect of mast cells against Enterococcus faecalis. Infection and immunity. 2014;82:4496–4507. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02114-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.von Kockritz-Blickwede M, et al. Phagocytosis-independent antimicrobial activity of mast cells by means of extracellular trap formation. Blood. 2008;111:3070–3080. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-104018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Paul C, et al. Mast cells have no impact on cutaneous leishmaniasis severity and related Th2 differentiation in resistant and susceptible mice. European journal of immunology. 2016;46:114–121. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sacks D, Noben-Trauth N. The immunology of susceptibility and resistance to Leishmania major in mice. Nature reviews. Immunology. 2002;2:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nri933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Bernard M, et al. The Helicobacter pylori VacA cytotoxin activates RBL-2H3 cells by inducing cytosolic calcium oscillations. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:191–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mollerherm H, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Branitzki-Heinemann K. Antimicrobial Activity of Mast Cells: Role and Relevance of Extracellular DNA Traps. Frontiers in immunology. 2016;7:265. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Munoz S, Hernandez-Pando R, Abraham SN, Enciso JA. Mast cell activation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: mediator release and role of CD48. Journal of immunology. 2003;170:5590–5596. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.11.5590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sakurai A, Yamaguchi N, Sonoyama K. Cell Wall Polysaccharides of Candida albicans Induce Mast Cell Degranulation in the Gut. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2012;31:67–70. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.31.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fulton JD, Joyner IP. Infections by Leishmania donovani in the Cotton Rat. J Gen Microbiol. 1948;2:103–109. doi: 10.1099/00221287-2-1-103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nolan TJ, Farrell JP. Experimental infections of the multimammate rat (Mastomys natalensis) with Leishmania donovani and Leishmania major. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1987;36:264–269. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Charmoy M, et al. Leishmania major induces distinct neutrophil phenotypes in mice that are resistant or susceptible to infection. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2007;82:288–299. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0706440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murray HW, et al. Regulatory actions of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 in Leishmania donovani infection in the liver. Infection and immunity. 2013;81:2318–2326. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01468-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pandey SP, Doyen N, Mishra GC, Saha B, Chandel HS. TLR9-deficiency reduces TLR1, TLR2 and TLR3 expressions in Leishmania major-infected macrophages. Experimental parasitology. 2015;154:82–86. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kane MM, Mosser DM. Leishmania parasites and their ploys to disrupt macrophage activation. Curr Opin Hematol. 2000;7:26–31. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200001000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Malaviya R, et al. Mast cell phagocytosis of FimH-expressing enterobacteria. Journal of immunology. 1994;152:1907–1914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Roma EH, et al. Impact of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the control of parasite loads and inflammation in Leishmania amazonensis infection. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:193. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1472-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carneiro PP, et al. The Role of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species in the Killing of Leishmania braziliensis by Monocytes from Patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. PloS one. 2016;11:e0148084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Das M, Mukherjee SB, Shaha C. Hydrogen peroxide induces apoptosis-like death in Leishmania donovani promastigotes. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:2461–2469. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.13.2461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gabriel C, McMaster WR, Girard D, Descoteaux A. Leishmania donovani promastigotes evade the antimicrobial activity of neutrophil extracellular traps. Journal of immunology. 2010;185:4319–4327. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stoiber W, Obermayer A, Steinbacher P, Krautgartner WD. The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the Formation of Extracellular Traps (ETs) in Humans. Biomolecules. 2015;5:702–723. doi: 10.3390/biom5020702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;191:677–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Spath GF, Garraway LA, Turco SJ, Beverley SM. The role(s) of lipophosphoglycan (LPG) in the establishment of Leishmania major infections in mammalian hosts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9536–9541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530604100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guimaraes-Costa AB, et al. 3′-nucleotidase/nuclease activity allows Leishmania parasites to escape killing by neutrophil extracellular traps. Infection and immunity. 2014;82:1732–1740. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01232-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dwyer DM, Gottlieb M. Surface membrane localization of 3′- and 5′-nucleotidase activities in Leishmania donovani promastigotes. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 1984;10:139–150. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(84)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Joshi MB, Dwyer DM. Molecular and functional analyses of a novel class I secretory nuclease from the human pathogen, Leishmania donovani. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282:10079–10095. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610770200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Murray HW, Masur H, Keithly JS. Cell-mediated immune response in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. I. Correlation between resistance to Leishmania donovani and lymphokine-generating capacity. Journal of immunology. 1982;129:344–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nandan D, Reiner NE. Attenuation of gamma interferon-induced tyrosine phosphorylation in mononuclear phagocytes infected with Leishmania donovani: selective inhibition of signaling through Janus kinases and Stat1. Infection and immunity. 1995;63:4495–4500. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.11.4495-4500.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Prive, C. & Descoteaux, A. Leishmania donovani promastigotes evade the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinasesp38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 during infection of naive macrophages. European journal of immunology30, 2235-2244, 10.1002/1521-4141(2000)30:8<2235::AID-IMMU2235>3.0.CO;2-9 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 55.Shadab M, Ali N. Evasion of Host Defence by Leishmania donovani: Subversion of Signaling Pathways. Molecular biology international. 2011;2011:343961. doi: 10.4061/2011/343961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gregory DJ, Sladek R, Olivier M, Matlashewski G. Comparison of the effects of Leishmania major or Leishmania donovani infection on macrophage gene expression. Infection and immunity. 2008;76:1186–1192. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01320-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dahdah A, et al. Mast cells aggravate sepsis by inhibiting peritoneal macrophage phagocytosis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2014;124:4577–4589. doi: 10.1172/JCI75212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Selvapandiyan A, et al. Centrin gene disruption impairs stage-specific basal body duplication and cell cycle progression in Leishmania. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:25703–25710. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402794200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Vaidyanathan VV, Puri N, Roche PA. The last exon of SNAP-23 regulates granule exocytosis from mast cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:25101–25106. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103536200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES