Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging logoLink to The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging
. 2017 Jul-Sep;27(3):293–297. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_54_17

Endovascular management of iatrogenic renal vascular injuries complicating percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Role of renal angiography and embolization; an analysis of 159 cases

J Venkateswarlu 1,, M Sravan Kumar 1, Ravindra P Babu 1, Anand Abkari 1
PMCID: PMC5644321  PMID: 29089676

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the use of renal angiography in the detection of renal vascular injuries following percutaneous nephrolithotomy and to assess the efficacy of endovascular management of these complications.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective review of 159 consecutive patients over a period of 12 years from 2005 to 2016 who presented with significant post nephrolithotomy hemorrhage and who were evaluated by renal angiography as a first-line diagnostic study, followed by embolization of identified renal vascular injuries in the same session. The parameters assessed for each patient included type of renal vascular injury identified, type of embolic material and therapeutic outcome.

Results:

Renal vascular lesions identified in 119 patients were treated with embolization with complete resolution of hemorrhage, no further clinical deterioration and preservation of renal function.

Conclusions:

Renal vascular injury is a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Early renal angiography and selective embolization can play an integral diagnostic and therapeutic role.

Keywords: Angiography, embolization, nephrolithotomy, percutaneous, therapeutic

Introduction

Percutaneous nephrolithotmy (PCNL) is a safe and effective treatment modality for the management of renal calculi. This technique is associated with high success rates, decreased morbidity and few complications. The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage complicating PCNL ranges from 0.8% to 7.0%. PCNL has largely replaced open surgery for patients of all ages and for nearly all types of renal stones. The reported incidence of vascular injury and hemorrhage is lower for PCNL than for open surgery for renal stones.[1] This study aimed to describe the use of renal angiography in the detection of renal vascular injuries following PCNL, as well as to assess the efficacy of endovascular management of these complications.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This study was a retrospective review of 159 consecutive patients who were referred to a single interventional radiologist over a period of 12 years from 2005 to 2016. The parameters assessed were type of renal vascular injury identified, embolization technique, and therapeutic outcome.

Design

All patients who presented with significant post-PCNL hemorrhage were evaluated by renal angiography as a first-line imaging study. Patients who had vascular complications identified by renal angiography were subsequently treated with embolization in the same session. Common femoral artery access was followed by an abdominal aortogram to demonstrate the vascular anatomy, to determine the presence of accessory renal arteries [Figures 13] and to exclude iatrogenic injury to extrarenal vessels. Selective renal arteriogram on the affected side was then performed following assessment of the anatomical configuration of the ipsilateral renal artery. After the site and type of vascular injury was identified by the renal arteriogram, selective or superselective catheterization of the feeding vessel was then performed using diagnostic or microcatheters. In all affected patients, embolic materials consisting of butyl cyanoacrylate (Glue) [Figure 1], coils [Figures 24] and gelfoam [Figures 5 and 6] and were used to exclude the lesion from the renal circulation without compromising the vascular supply to the rest of the kidney. A completion angiogram was performed after the procedure to document vascular stasis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Post-PCNL hematuria in a 45-year-old women showed pseudoaneurysm on digital subtraction angiogram on the right side. Embolized with n butyl cyano acrylate (glue). Check angiogram showed occlusion of aneurysm. Plain radiograph showed glue cast in the aneurysm area

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Double renal arteries. AVF from lower polar artery on left side embolized with coils. Control angiogram showed occlusion of AVF

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A 31-year-old woman with post-PCNL hematuria showed double renal arteries. AVF from lower polar artery embolized with coil. Control angiogram showed occlusion of AVF

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Large stag horn calculus with hydronephrosis with massive hematuria during 2nd postoperative day. CT angiogram showed large pseudoaneurysm in the right lower polar region. Digital subtraction angiogram showed pseudoaneurysm. Control angiogram after coil embolization showed occlusion of the lesion

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Post-PCNL hematuria in a 42-year-old man showed pseudoaneurysm on digital subtraction angiogram on right side. Embolized with gelfoam. Check angiogram showed occlusion of aneurysm

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Active bleeding noted in multiple areas. Control angiogram showed disappearance of bleeding areas

Results

Renal angiography in 159 consecutive patients who underwent PCNL from January 2005 to 2016 presented with significant post-PCNL hemorrhage showed pseudoaneurysm 83 (52.2%) [Table 1 and Figure 1], arteriovenous fistula (AVF) 21 (13.2%) [Figures 2 and 3], aneurysm and AVF 8 (5%) active bleeding in 5 (4.2%), perirenal hematoma 2 (1.25%) and normal findings in 40 (25.1%). The mean time to presentation was 11.5 days (range, 1 to 60 days) following PCNL. Renal angiograms were performed as first-line imaging studies except a few patients underwent abdominal ultrasound when there was a suspicion of perirenal hematoma, and a single case who underwent CT angiogram prior to renal angiogram. One hundred and nineteen patients underwent embolization in the same sitting of diagnostic renal angiogram. One technical failure due to dissection of renal artery, initially undergone successful embolization subsequently. Embolic materials used were gelfoam [Figures 5 and 6], coils [Figures 24], glue [Figure 1], or combination of materials. Coils were embolic materials in 51 cases (42.8%), coils in (36.1%), gelfoam in 22 (18.5%) and combination of coils and glue in 3 (2.5%). No recurrence of bleeding was noted in the immediate postprocedural follow-up or in embolized group or in normal angiogram group. No empirical embolization was done.

Table 1.

Renal angiogram findings in patients

graphic file with name IJRI-27-293-g007.jpg

Discussion

PCNL is the treatment of choice for most renal calculi. Although the technique is safe and effective, complications of significant postoperative hemorrhage have been reported.[2] Bleeding may also be encountered during puncture and track dilatation, however, this often responds to the tamponade effect provided by placement of the nephrostomy tube. Nephrostomy-related vascular injuries are believed to be the result of trauma to either the anterior or posterior segmental arteries, rather than the smaller peripheral interlobular arteries, which are surrounded by dense parenchyma and therefore easier to tamponade with the nephrostomy tube. Endovascular techniques are increasingly used to accurately diagnose and effectively treat vascular complications arising from percutaneous interventions. The choice of embolic material depends on the site and accessibility of the vessel feeding the pseudoaneurysm or AVF. With the past experience of 30 years in embolization of various renal lesions, choice of embolic material was chosen. For large AVFs coils were choice of embolic material; for aneurysms n butyl cyanoacrylate was the embolic material of choice and for smaller lesions, either a fistula or aneurysm, gelfoam was used. Phadke et al.[3] recommended using steel coils after gelfoam pledgets for medium-sized feeding vessels. We report our experience with transcatheter arterial embolization in a series of 119 consecutive patients with renal bleeding following percutaneous procedures. Treatment was successful in all patients and no complication was observed either at early or late follow-up, confirming the safety and efficacy of this technique. The reported success rate ranges from 80 to 100%.[4,5,6,7,8,9,10] The minimally invasive nature and the rapid cessation of hemorrhage, together with minimal loss of renal function, makes superselective embolization a valuable tool. The authors recognize that renal ultrasonography and CT scans of the kidneys are potentially valuable noninvasive imaging modalities that can also be used to assess pre-angiographic evaluation of lesions for positive or negative findings, which will help in management protocol. Lesions detected on imaging should undergo therapeutic embolization or negative imaging studies may be used to continue conservative treatment.

Conclusion

Our results confirm safety and efficacy of transcatheter renal artery embolization in acute patients with arterial lesions following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. High success rate, low incidence of complications and rapid recovery represent highly appealing reasons for making this technique the first-choice treatment option in cases of severe renal hemorrhage. Hyperselective catheterization and embolization allow parenchymal sparing, thus reducing the incidence of adverse events such as renal dysfunction and hypertension. A close cooperation between interventional radiologists and urologists is mandatory to enable prompt and effective treatment of this rare but severe complication as well as to avoid major surgery.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A. Treatment of complete staghorn stones: A prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2005;173:469–73. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000150519.49495.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An update. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13:235–41. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200305000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Phadke RV, Sawlani V, Rastogi H. Iatrogenic renal vascular injuries and their radiological management. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:119–23. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80104-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martin X, Murat FJ, Feitosa LC, Rouvière O, Lyonnet D, Gelet A, et al. Severe bleeding after nephrolithotomy; Results of therapeutic embolization. Eur Urol. 2000;37:136–9. doi: 10.1159/000020129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vignali C, Lonzi S, Bargellini I, Cioni R, Petruzzi P, Caramella D, et al. Vascular injuries after percutaneous renal procedures: Treatment by transcatheter embolization. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:723–9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang C, Mao Q, Tan F, Shen B. Superselective renal artery embolization in the treatment of renal hemorrhage. Ir J Med Sci. 2013;183:5963. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-0972-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Uflacker R, Paolini RM, Lima S. Management of traumatic hematuria by selective renal artery embolization. J Urol. 1984;132:662–6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49810-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cantasdemir M, Adaletli I, Cebi D, Kantarci F, Selcuk ND, Numan F. Emergency endovascular embolization of traumatic intrarenal arterial pseudoaneurysms with N-butyl cyanoacrylate. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:560. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chiramel GK, Keshava SN, Moses V, Kekre N, Tamilarasi V, Devasia A. Clinical outcomes of endovascularly managed iatrogenic renal hemorrhages. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015;25:380–90. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.169454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin X, Murat FJ, Feltosa LC. Severe bleeding after nephrolithotomy: Results of hyperselective embolization. Eur Urol. 2000;37:136–9. doi: 10.1159/000020129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES