Abstract
pyrE (STM3733) encodes orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRTase; EC 2.4.2.10), the fifth enzyme of the de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway. We identified a ΔpyrE mutant as under selection in screening of a Salmonella mutant library in 4-day old chicks. Here, we confirm that a ΔpyrE mutant colonizes 4-day old chicks poorly in competitive infection with isogenic wild type, and that the ability of this mutant to colonize chicks could be restored by providing a copy of pyrE in trans. We further show that our ΔpyrE mutant grows poorly in nutrient poor conditions in vitro, and that the ability of this mutant to grow is restored, both in vitro and in chicks, when precursors to the pyrimidine salvage pathway were provided. This finding suggests that the environment in the chick intestine during our infections lacks sufficient precursors of the pyrimidine salvage pathway to support Salmonella growth. Finally, we show that the colonization defect of a ΔpyrE mutant during infection occurs in to chicks, but not in CBA/J mice or ligated ileal loops in calves. Our data suggest that de novo pyrimidine synthesis is necessary for colonization of Salmonella Typhimurium in the chick, and that the salvage pathway is not used in this niche.
Introduction
Organisms can acquire pyrimidines by two mechanisms, they can either generate them de novo, or acquire them via a salvage pathway. De novo pyrimidine synthesis occurs in all organisms [1] and is accomplished by the sequential reactions of six enzymes (Fig 1): carbamyl phosphate synthetase (CPSase; EC 2.7.2.5), aspartate transcarbamylase (ATCase; EC 2.1.3.2), dihydroorotase (DHOase; EC 3.5.2.3), dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHOdehase; EC 1.3.3.1), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRTase; EC 2.4.2.10), and orotidylate decarboxylase (OMPdecase; EC 4.1.1.23) [2–4]. These six enzymes are encoded by six unlinked genes in all organisms [1, 5]. In the second mechanism, the pyrimidine salvage pathways converts preformed pyrimidine bases or nucleosides into pyrimidine nucleotides [6]. Enzymes including uridine kinase (udk, EC 2.7.1.48), UMP pyrophosphorylase (upp, EC 2.4.2.9), uridine phosphorylase (udp, EC 2.4.2.3), and cytidine deaminase (cdd, EC 3.5.4.5) are involved in this process [7].
In Salmonella Typhimurium, the common pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway consists [1] of six enzymes involved in the pathway that are encoded by six unlinked genes, pyrA (STM0067), pyrB (STM4460), pyrC (STM1163), pyrD (STM1058), pyrE (STM3733) and pyrF (STM1707) respectively (Fig 1) [5]. Several studies of the regulation of expression of the pyr genes and their role in virulence have been reported [8–12]. Fox and Bzik have reported that de novo pyrimidine synthesis is required for virulence of Toxoplasma gondii [11] and recently it has been reported that pyrimidine biosynthesis modulates production of biofilm determinants in E. coli [12].
We became interested in pyrE (STM3733) because we identified this gene as under selection in a genetic screen for mutants required for Salmonella Typhimurium infection of 4-day old chicks [13]. pyrE (STM3733), encodes orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRTase; EC 2.4.2.10), needed for the fifth step of pyrimidine biosynthesis and catalyzes the formation of orotidine 5’-monophosphate (OMP) from orotic acid (OA) and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) [14]. In Listeria monocytogenes pyrE expression was induced preferentially when this organism was inside J774 murine macrophage-like cells, and the Listeria pyrE null is a pyrimidine auxotroph [15]. However, mutations in pyrE did not reduce virulence of Listeria in either C3H or BALB/C mice [15, 16]. In contrast, some transposon mutants of Salmonella Typhimurium that cannot survive within macrophages and are less virulent in Salmonella-sensitive BALB/C mice were also reportedly purine or pyrimidine auxotrophs [17]. There have been no studies to assess the pyrE requirements for colonization and persistence in other animal models.
We studied the role of pyrE in intestinal colonization of the chick by Salmonella. We confirm that a mutant lacking pyrE is severely impaired for colonization in 4-day old chicks from day 1 post infection, and determined that mutants in this gene are pyrimidine auxotrophs. We further show that the pyrE mutant colonizes other animal models similar to the wild type, and that uracil supplementation restored the ability of the pyrE mutant to colonize chicks.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
All strains in this study are derived from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC14028 (Manassas, VA) and are listed in Table 1. Strains were routinely cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and agar plates supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. Bacterial cultures used to infect chicks were grown to stationary phase in LB broth at 41°C with aeration and were supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics. Antibiotics and other supplements were used at the following concentrations: 40 mg/L 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (XP), 50 mg/L kanamycin (Kan), 100 mg/L nalidixic acid (Nal), and 100mg/L carbenicillin (Carb).
Table 1. Strains used in this study.
Strain | Genotype | Reference |
---|---|---|
HA383 | S. enterica sv. Typhimurium ATCC14028s | ATCC |
HA420 | WT 14028s NalR | [18] |
HA431 | HA420 ΔphoN::KanR | [18] |
HA877 | HA420 ΔphoN::NalR pWSK29 | This study |
HA1293 | ΔSTM3733::KanR pWSK29::STM3733 | This study |
HA1301 | ΔSTM3733::KanR pWSK29 | This study |
HA1470 | HA420 ΔSTM3733::KanR | This study |
pWSK29 | Cloning vector, AmpR | [19] |
Testing growth in vitro
Growth was tested in vitro by quantifying individual growth of the mutant and the wild type HA431 (HA420 ΔphoN::KanR), and competitive growth of these strains in co-culture. Both individual and co-culture assays were performed in LB and M9 media [20, 21]. For measuring individual growth in LB broth, overnight cultures of mutant and wild type were sub-cultured 1:100 into sterile LB supplemented with kanamycin. For testing individual growth in M9 broth, 1 ml of bacteria was collected from overnight cultures by centrifugation and bacterial pellets were washed twice in M9 broth. Washed bacteria were resuspended in 1 ml of M9 and a 1:50 dilution was made into fresh M9 supplemented with kanamycin. All sub-cultures were grown at 37°C with aeration for 24 hours. The number of bacterial colony forming units (CFU) was evaluated at 1, 2, 5, 7, and 24 hours of subculture by plating serial ten-fold dilutions in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) on LB agar supplemented with kanamycin.
For testing competitive growth, overnight culture of mutant and wild type (HA431) were mixed in 1:1 ratio. This equal mixture was sub-cultured in fresh LB or M9 broth supplemented with kanamycin. Overnight cultures of mutant and wild type were washed twice in M9 broth prior to being mixed in equal proportions and grown in M9 broth. At 1, 2, 5, 7 and 24 hours of sub-culture, aliquots were collected, serially diluted, and plated on LB agar containing appropriate antibiotics and supplements for enumeration of CFU. The ratio of recovered mutant to wild type was normalized by the input ratio to determine the competitive index. All experiments were done three times on three separate occasions. Mean bacterial number was calculated and converted logarithmically. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s two-tailed t-test with significance set at p < 0.05.
Plasmid construction
A plasmid containing the intact pyrE gene (STM3733) and flanking regions was constructed in the following way. A fragment containing the pyrE gene and approximately 200 base pairs upstream as well as 50–100 base pairs downstream was amplified using following primers; STM3733EcoRIF, 5’- accgaattcgtacagggtaccgcggaagg-3’ and STM3733HindIIIR, 5’- accaagcttggtaaagcgccaccgggcaa-3’. PCR products were generated using pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies) in 50 μl volume, and an annealing temperature of 58°C for 30 cycles. PCR products were digested with EcoRI and HindIII as per manufacturer instructions (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). Digested PCR products were ligated into pWSK29 previously cut with the same enzymes [19]. Each ligation was transformed into XL1-Blue and positive clones were selected on LB plates containing carbenicillin. Correct inserts were confirmed by restriction digest and sequencing.
Uracil supplementation
A sterile uracil stock solution (1%, Acros Organics) was used to supplement M9 minimal media (20 mg/L) or chick diets (1% wt/wt). To supplement uracil to chick diets, 100 g of chick diet (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) was soaked in 100 ml of 1% uracil solution and permitted to air dry [22].
Animal experiments
Ethics statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendation in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Texas A&M University (AUP permits: 2010–038 (chicks), 2011–167 (mouse), 2012–095 (calf).
Chick hatching
Specific pathogen free (SPF) eggs were obtained from Charles River SPAFAS (North Franklin, CT). Eggs were incubated in an egg incubator (GQF Manufacturing Co.) at 38°C and with 58–65% of humidity for 21 days. Eggs were periodically rotated for the first 18 days and then moved to the hatching tray for the last 3 days pre-hatch [20]. Chicks were housed in a poultry brooder (Alternative Design Manufacturing, Siloam Springs, AR) at 32°C to 35°C with ad libitum access to tap water and irradiated lab chick diet (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI).
Competitive infections in the chick
Four-day old specific pathogen free (SPF) White Leghorn chicks were used. ΔpyrE and wild type, HA431 (ATCC14028 ΔphoN::KanR) [20] were grown to stationary phase in LB supplemented with kanamycin at 41°C with aeration, and mixed in 1:1 ratio. Groups of 5 chicks were orally infected with 1x109 CFU of this mixed inoculum. Infected animals were monitored twice daily for signs of illness. On days 1, 3, and 9 post-infection, chicks were humanely euthanized. The ceca, cecal tonsil, spleen, liver, and bursa were excised, homogenized in phosphate buffered saline (1ml PBS for cecal tonsil, 3 ml for all other organs), serially diluted, and plated on LB agar plate supplemented with kanamycin and XP. Inactivation of phoN, encoding alkaline phosphatase, abolishes the ability to cleave 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (XP) resulting in the formation of white colonies on LB plates supplemented with XP while phoN+ strains appear blue. However mutations in phoN do not affect the ability of S. Typhimurium to colonize or persist of in murine or chick models [23] (and data not shown).
For the infection in chicks fed uracil supplemented diets, chicks were randomly divided into 3 groups after hatching as follows; (1) chicks fed uracil untreated diets (Ura -/-), (2) chicks fed uracil supplemented diets until day 3 post-infection and then switched to un-supplemented diets (Ura +/-), (3) chicks fed uracil supplemented diets throughout the study (Ura +/+). Chick body weights were measured before infection and at time of euthanasia determine weight gain.
Competitive infections in the Salmonella-resistant mice
Groups of five 8- to 10-week-old female CBA/J mice (Jackson Laboratory) were infected by gavage with mixture of a ΔpyrE mutant and the wild type, HA431 (ATCC14028 ΔphoN::KanR) as described previously [18]. Briefly, strains were grown to stationary phase at 37°C with aeration and mixed in a 1:1 ratio of ΔpyrE to wild type. Five mice were infected with 1x109 CFU of equal mixture of ΔpyrE and wild type and infected mice were observed daily for signs of illness. Feces were collected every 3 days, homogenized in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS), serially diluted and plated to enumerate colony forming units (CFU) of each strain. On day 41 post-infection, mice were euthanized. The cecum, Peyer’s patch, mesenteric lymph node, spleen and liver were excised, homogenized, serially diluted in PBS, and plated on LB supplemented with kanamycin and XP to enumerate CFU.
Competitive infection in ligated ileal loops in the calf
We purchased Angus cross calves from a breeding herd at the Veterinary Medical Park at Texas A&M University. Calves were separated from the dam at approximately 24 hours after birth, and measurement of total serum protein was used to evaluate adequate passive transfer. Calves were housed in an AAALAC-approved barn, fed milk replacer twice daily, and provided with water and grass hay. Selective fecal cultures were performed at least once weekly to ensure calves remained negative for Salmonella spp. [24] [25]. At 3 to 6 weeks of age, calves were anesthetized for ligated ileal loop surgery and surgery was performed as previously described [26] [27]. Ligated ileal loops were infected by intraluminal injection of 3 ml of a 1:1 mixture of the ΔpyrE mutant bearing the empty vector (HA1301, ΔSTM3733::KanR pWSK29) and wild type, HA877 (HA420 ΔphoN::NalR pWSK29) containing approximately 1x109 CFU total. At 12 hours post infection, tissue, mucus, and luminal fluid were collected, homogenized, serially diluted in PBS, and plated to enumerate CFU. Calves were humanely euthanized by barbiturate overdose (pentobarbital) administered intravenously. These infections were performed in three different animals.
Results
Salmonella Typhimurium ΔpyrE mutant is attenuated during chick oral infection
We identified the pyrE gene as a candidate needed for colonization and persistence of Salmonella Typhimurium after oral infection of 4-day old chicks. pyrE encodes orotate phosphoribosyltransferase, the fifth enzyme involved in pyrimidine biosynthesis. PyrE catalyzes the formation of orotidine 5’-monophosphate (OMP) from orotate and phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (Fig 1A) [14]. The genomic context of pyrE (STM3733) is shown in Fig 1B (annotated as orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.2.4.10, OPRTase).
To confirm the requirement for pyrE during colonization and persistence in this animal model, we retested the ΔpyrE mutant in chicks in competitive infection with isogenic wild type, HA431 (ATCC14028 ΔphoN::KanR). A mutant in pyrE colonized all organs tested poorly from the earliest points in infection. The pyrE null mutant had a significant reduction in colonization of all organs that was most severe in the gastrointestinal tract with greater than a 1000-fold reduction relative to the wild type at day 3 post infection (Fig 2A). Returning an intact copy of pyrE in trans to a ΔpyrE mutant reversed the colonization defect of the deletion mutant in chicks in all organs we examined (Fig 2B). Thus, we confirmed that enzymes needed for de novo pyrimidine synthesis in Salmonella Typhimurium are needed for colonization of 4-day old chicks. In addition, we infer that precursors of the salvage pathway are either not present or not available in high enough quantity to support the growth of the pyrE mutant in chicks.
ΔpyrE mutant in Typhimurium is defective for growth in M9 minimal media
Previous studies using L. monocytogenes showed that pyrE mutants in Listeria are pyrimidine auxotrophs [15, 28]. Thus, the inability of a ΔpyrE mutant of S. Typhimurium to colonize chicks could be due to a growth defect under pyrimidine-limited conditions. In order to test this hypothesis, we measured growth of Typhimurium ΔpyrE mutant in LB and M9 minimal broth. The ΔpyrE mutant grew indistinguishably from wild type in LB, but grew poorly in M9 broth (Fig 3A). The growth defect of the ΔpyrE mutant was also observed in competitive growth with isogenic wild type, HA431 in M9 broth. The ΔpyrE mutant maintained the same cell density as the wild type during first 2 hours of subculture but a growth defect became apparent at 5 hours (Fig 3B). The ΔpyrE mutant grew approximately 10-fold less than the wild type at 24 hours and this was consistent with our other results.
Uracil supplementation reverses growth defect of ΔpyrE mutant in M9 media
To investigate whether the growth defect of ΔpyrE mutant in M9 minimal media is due to the lack of active de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway, we examined whether the salvage pathway could rescue the growth defect of the ΔpyrE mutant in M9 media. We supplemented solid or liquid M9 minimal media with 20 mg/L of uracil, which can be converted to UMP through the pyrimidine salvage pathway (Fig 1A). Addition of uracil to the M9 plates restored the ability of the ΔpyrE mutant to grow to levels similar to the wild type organism (Fig 4A). We observed similar results when the wild type and the ΔpyrE mutant bacteria were grown in M9 broth supplemented with uracil (Fig 4B and 4C). Growth of the ΔpyrE mutant was nearly equal to wild type in uracil supplemented M9 broth (Fig 4B and 4C). These results support the hypothesis that the growth defect of the ΔpyrE mutant in pyrimidine limited conditions is due to restriction of de novo pyrimidine synthesis, and this growth defect can be rescued when the salvage pathway is activated through uracil supplementation. This result is consistent with the previous study by Klarsfeld et al. [15].
Colonization defect of Salmonella Typhimurium ΔpyrE mutant is restricted to chickens
Previously it has been reported that a ΔpyrE mutant in Listeria monocytogenes does not have reduced virulence in mice [15, 16]. We show that a ΔpyrE mutant in S. Typhimurium colonizes 4-day old chicks very poorly (Fig 2A). We wanted to further investigate the ability of S. Typhimurium ΔpyrE mutants to survive in other animal models. First, we tested the ability of the ΔpyrE mutant to survive intestinal inflammation during a 12 hour incubation in ligated ileal loops in calves, a model that closely resembles the early stages of human infections with non-typhoidal Salmonella. We found that survival of the ΔpyrE mutant was very similar to the wild type organism in ligated ileal loops, in the face of robust fluid generation in the loop (Fig 5A, Left panel = fluid generation in the loop, Right panel = mutant survival relative to WT survival). This data suggested that disruption of pyrimidine biosynthesis does not limit Salmonella survival and growth in intestinal fluid, mucus or tissue during short-term infections.
We also infected Salmonella-resistant CBA/J mice with an equal mixture of the ΔpyrE mutant and isogenic wild type, HA431 (ATCC14028 ΔphoN::KanR), and monitored shedding of these strains in feces to 41 days post-infection (Fig 5B and 5C). In contrast to infection in chicks, the ΔpyrE mutant was able to colonize the intestinal tract of CBA/J mice well, and was shed in feces at levels similar to the wild type between 1 and 9 days post-infection. At 13 days post-infection and beyond, the ability of this mutant to colonize the intestinal tract in mice, although it appears to be reduced relative to the wild type, is not statistically significantly different from the wild type organism (Fig 5B). At 41 days post infection, the ability of the ΔpyrE mutant to colonize the ceca, Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen and liver in infected CBA/J mice was not statistically significantly different from the wild type organism. Our data suggest that pyrmidine biosynthesis by the de novo pathway is not required during non-typhoidal Salmonella infection in mice, in contrast to the requirement for this pathway during infection in chicks.
Uracil-supplemented diet rescues colonization defect of Salmonella Typhimurium ΔpyrE mutant in 4-day old chicks
A previous study has reported that the enzyme activity of carbamyl phosphate synthetase (CPSase; EC 2.7.2.5) and aspartate transcarbamylase (ATCase; EC 2.1.3.2), the first 2 enzymes in de novo pyrimidine synthesis are extremely low in 3-week-old chicks compared to other animals such as mice, rats or pigeons [29]. We hypothesized that the host specific colonization defect of ΔpyrE mutant in chickens is linked to insufficient pyrimidine precursors or synthesis in the chick. We randomly divided chicks into two groups immediately after hatching and each group was fed either uracil supplemented (uracil +) or regular (uracil -) diets, respectively. At day 4 post-hatch, both groups of chicks were infected with equal mixtures of ΔpyrE mutant and isogenic wild type, HA431.
At day 3 post-infection, chicks from both groups were euthanized and various organs were collected and processed to assess Salmonella colonization. At this point, remaining chicks from the uracil-supplemented group were subdivided into 2 groups. The first group was maintained on uracil-supplemented food (uracil +/+) while the second group had uracil withdrawn from their diets (uracil +/-). At day 9 post-infection, these remaining chicks were euthanized and organs were collected and processed to compare Salmonella colonization between groups (Fig 6A outlines this scheme).
Uracil supplementation is well tolerated by chicks of this age, as uracil supplementation did not affect weight gain or general health of the chicks (data not shown). As expected, the ΔpyrE mutant colonized chicks fed regular diets poorly. However, the colonization defect of the ΔpyrE mutant was reversed in chicks fed diets supplemented with uracil in ceca, cecal tonsil, and bursa at day 3 post-infection (Fig 6B). Moreover, the ΔpyrE mutant was able successfully compete with wild type for colonization of all organs on Day 9 post infection in chicks continuously fed uracil supplemented diets (Fig 6C triangles). Finally, withdrawal of uracil from the chick diet at day 3 post-infection (Uracil +/-) resulted in an immediate decrease in colonization by the ΔpyrE mutant in ceca but not in cecal tonsil and bursa (Fig 6D square marks). These data support the hypothesis that pyrimidine supply is limited in the chick gastrointestinal tract, and that precursors of the salvage pathway are also not readily available.
Discussion
The synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides occurs through two distinct pathways: via pathway for de novo synthesis of pyrimidines from small molecules, or by a salvage pathway that utilizes preformed pyrimidine bases or nucleosides. The de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway is highly conserved between animals and microorganisms [6] and it is accomplished by the sequential reaction of six enzymes that are encoded by six unlinked genes in Salmonella Typhimurium [1]. Both a previous genetic screen we performed, and a screen performed by others suggested that genes in the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway were under selection during colonization of chicks [30]. We now show that de novo pyrimidine synthesis in Salmonella is critical for this organism to colonize the intestine in chicks.
Our mutant lacking pyrE, which behaves as a pyrimidine auxotroph in vitro, has a severe colonization defect in this chicks. The growth defect of our ΔpyrE mutant in minimal media is reversed when uracil is provided and the salvage pathway can be used instead (Figs 3 and 4). Consistent with our findings, Salmonella mutants lacking pyrD (STM1058), the fourth enzyme in the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway encoding dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHOdehase; EC 1.3.3.1), also grow poorly in pyrimidine limited conditions [31], and appear to be under selection during a genetic screen 1-day old chicks [32]. Furthermore, pyrC, the third enzyme in the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway (DHOase; EC 3.5.2.3) (Fig 1B), is up-regulated in cecal tissue harvested from chickens infected with Salmonella Typhimurium [33]. Our findings and those of others suggest that in young chicks, the de novo pathway for pyrimidine biosynthesis is critical for the establishment of non-typhoidal Salmonella infection.
Although our pyrE deletion mutant colonized chicks very poorly, it appears to colonize ligated ileal loops in calves and orally infected CBA/J mice very similar to the wild type organism. The activities of pyrA and pyrB, encoding carbamyl phosphate synthetase (CPSase; EC 2.7.2.5) and aspartate transcarbamylase (ATCase; EC 2.1.3.2), respectively, differ in various animals including rat, mice, pigeon and chick but are especially low in 3-week old chicks compared to other animal models, supporting our findings [29]. Additional work on pyrE mutants in Listeria monocytogenes also indicated that pyrE is not involved in virulence and colonization of Listeria in C3H and BALB/c mice [15]. These findings support the hypothesis that the chick intestine, but not the murine intestine, is a pyrimidine-limited. Furthermore, the salvage pathway for pyrimidine synthesis does not appear to be functional in young chicks, perhaps because precursors such as uracil may not be present in the intestine in high enough quantity.
Finally, the colonization defect of our ΔpyrE mutant was rescued by the addition of uracil to the chick diets over the 9-day infections we performed. While the ΔpyrE mutant colonized similar to the wild type when the diet was supplemented with uracil, uracil deprivation after the establishment of infection resulted in the immediate loss of the ability of the ΔpyrE mutant to colonize the intestinal tract. However, withdrawal of uracil supplementation after the establishment of infection in the presence of uracil did not affect the ability of the pyrE mutant to colonize and persist in the cecal tonsil and bursa. These results are in agreement with previous findings that a ΔpyrE mutant in Listeria monocytogenes is pyrimidine auxotroph, and uracil supplementation restores the growth of this mutant to wild type levels [15].
To summarize, we show that a ΔpyrE mutant in Salmonella Typhimurium does not grow in pyrimidine-limited media, and poorly colonized in 4-day old chicks. Reduced growth of the ΔpyrE mutant in pyrimidine-limited conditions could be restored through addition of uracil, which can be utilized in a salvage pathway to generate pyrimidines. Moreover, it appears that pyrimidine biosynthesis is not limiting to Salmonella growth during infection of every animal model, suggesting that one could use auxotrophies to probe the nutritional environment of different niches during infection.
Supporting information
Data Availability
The minimal underlying data set necessary for replication of this study is available within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (CSREES 2009-03579, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI083646, R21AI083964, R56AI077645) to HAP. In addition, this work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI075093 and HHSN272200900040C, and the US-Isreal Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund grant # IS-4671-13CR) to MM. LB is supported in part by a subsidy to support the competitive growth of Kazan Federal University. The sponsors had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.O'Donovan GA, Neuhard J. Pyrimidine Metabolism in Microorganisms. Bacteriological reviews 1970;34:278–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jones M, Spector L, Lipmann F. Carbamyl Phosphate, the carbamyl donor in citrulline synthesis J Am Chem Soc. 1955;77 (3):819–20. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lieberman I, Kornberg A. Enzymic synthesis and breakdown of a pyrimidine, orotic acid. I. Dihydro-orotic dehydrogenase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1953;12(1–2): 223–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lieberman I, Kornberg A. Enzymatic Synthesis and Breakdown of a Pyrimidine, Orotic Acid: II. Dihidroorotic Acid, Ureidosuccinic Acid, and 5-Carboxymethylhydantoin Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1954;207(2):911–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sanderson KE. Linkage map of Salmonella typhimurium, Edition IV. Bacteriological Reviews 1972;36:558–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nyhan WL. Nucleotide Synthesis via Salvage Pathway. In: John Wiley & Sons L, editor. eLS; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.00039092005. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beck CF, Ingraham JL, Neuhard J, Thomassen E. Metabolism of Pyrimidines and Pyrimidine Nucleosides by Salmonella typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology. 1972;110(1):219–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jensen KF. Regulation of Salmonella typhimurium pyr Gene Expression: Effect of Changing Both Purine and Pyrimidine Nucleotide Pools. Microbiology. 1989;135(4):805–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Turnbough CL, & Switzer R. L. Regulation of Pyrimidine Biosynthetic Gene Expression in Bacteria: Repression without Repressors. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2008;72(2):266–300. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jensen KF, Neuhard J, Schack L. RNA polymerase involvement in the regulation of expression of Salmonella typhimurium pyr genes. Isolation and characterization of a fluorouracil-resistant mutant with high, constitutive expression of the pyrB and pyrE genes due to a mutation in rpoBC. EMBO J 1982;1(1):69–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fox BA, Bzik D. De novo pyrimidine biosynthesis is required for virulence of Toxoplasma gondii. Nature. 2002;415(21):926–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garavaglia M, Rossi E, Landini P. The Pyrimidine Nucleotide Biosynthetic Pathway Modulates Production of Biofilm Determinants in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang HJ, Bogomolnaya LM, Elfenbein JR, Endicott-Yazdani T, Reynolds MM, Porwollik S, et al. Novel Two-Step Hierarchical Screening of Mutant Pools Reveals Mutants under Selection in Chicks. Infect Immun. 2016;84(4):1226–38. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01525-15. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4807481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.González-Segura L, Witte J, McClard R, Hurley T. Ternary complex formation and induced asymmetry in orotate phosphoribosyltransferase. Biochemistry 2007;46 ((49)):14075–86. doi: 10.1021/bi701023z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Klarsfeld AD, Goossens PL, Cossart P. Five Listeria monocytogenes genes preferentially expressed in infected mammalian cells: plcA, purH, purD, pyrE and an arginine ABC transporter gene, arpJ. Molecular Microbiology. 1994;13(4):585–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marquis H, Bouwer HG, Hinrichs DJ, Portnoy DA. Intracytoplasmic growth and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes auxotrophic mutants. Infection and Immunity. 1993;61(9):3756–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fields P, Swanson R, Haidaris C, Heffron F. Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium that cannot survive within the macrophage are avirulent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83(14):5189–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bogomolnaya LM, Santiviago CA, Yang HJ, Baumler AJ, Andrews-Polymenis HL. 'Form variation' of the O12 antigen is critical for persistence of Salmonella Typhimurium in the murine intestine. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70(5):1105–19. Epub 2008/10/02. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06461.x. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang RF, Kushner SR. Construction of versatile low-copy-number vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991;100:195–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sivula C, Bogomolnaya L, Andrews-Polymenis H. A comparison of cecal colonization of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in White Leghorn Chicks and Salmonella-resistant mice. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:182 doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maniatis T, Sambrook J, Fritsch EF. Molecular cloning 2nd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Evans ME, Tian J, Gu LH, Jones DP, Ziegler TR. Dietary Supplementation With Orotate and Uracil Increases Adaptive Growth of Jejunal Mucosa After Massive Small Bowel Resection in Rats. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2005;29 (5):315–21. doi: 10.1177/0148607105029005315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weening EH, Barker JD, Laarakker MC, Humphries AD, Tsolis RM, Baumler AJ. The Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium lpf, bcf, stb, stc, std, and sth fimbrial operons are required for intestinal persistence in mice. Infect Immun. 2005;73(6):3358–66. PubMed doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3358-3366.2005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Santos RL, Zhang S, Tsolis RM, Baumler AJ, Adams LG. Morphologic and molecular characterization of Salmonella typhimurium infection in neonatal calves. Vet Pathol. 2002;39(2):200–15. Epub 2002/05/15. PubMed doi: 10.1354/vp.39-2-200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frost AJ, Bland AP, Wallis TS. The early dynamic response of the calf ileal epithelium to Salmonella typhimurium. Vet Pathol. 1997;34(5):369–86. Epub 1997/11/05. PubMed doi: 10.1177/030098589703400501 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang S, Santos RL, Tsolis RM, Stender S, Hardt WD, Baumler AJ, et al. The Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium Effector Proteins SipA, SopA, SopB, SopD, and SopE2 Act in Concert To Induce Diarrhea in Calves. Infect Immun. 2002;70:3843–55. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3843-3855.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Elfenbein JR, Endicott-Yazdani T, Porwollik S, Bogomolnaya LM, Cheng P, Guo J, et al. Novel determinants of intestinal colonization of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium identified in bovine enteric infection. Infect Immun. 2013. Epub 2013/09/11. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00874-13. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC 3811824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Klarsfeld A, Goossens P, Cossart P. Five Listeria monocytogenes genes preferentially expressed in infected mammaiian ceiis: picA, purH, purD, pyrE and an arginine ABC transporter gene, arpJ. Molecular Microbiology 1994;13(4):585–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jones SEHaME. A Glutamine-dependent Enzyme for the Synthesis of Carbamyl Phosphate for Pyrimidine Biosynthesis in Fetal Rat Liver. THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY. 1967;242(24):5674–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chaudhuri RR, Morgan E, Peters SE, Pleasance SJ, Hudson DL, Davies HM, et al. Comprehensive assignment of roles for Salmonella typhimurium genes in intestinal colonization of food-producing animals. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(4):e1003456 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003456. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3630085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khatiwara A, Jiang T, Sung S, Dawoud T, Kim J, Bhattacharya D, et al. Genome Scanning for Conditionally Essential Genes in Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012;78(9):p. 3098–107. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06865-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morgan E, Campbell JD, Rowe SC, Bispham J, Stevens MP, Bowen AJ, et al. Identification of host-specific colonization factors of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54(6):994–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Harvey PC, Watson M, Hulme S, Jones MA, Lovell M, Berchieri A Jr., et al. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium colonizing the lumen of the chicken intestine grows slowly and upregulates a unique set of virulence and metabolism genes. Infect Immun. 2011;79(10):4105–21. Epub 2011/07/20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01390-10. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3187277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The minimal underlying data set necessary for replication of this study is available within the paper and its Supporting Information files.