Abstract
Magnetic resonance contrast agents that can be activated in response to specific triggers hold potential as molecular biosensors that may be of great utility in non-invasive disease diagnosis. We developed an activatable agent based on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs) that is sensitive to oxidative stress, a factor in the pathophysiology of numerous diseases. SPIOs were coated with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and complexed with poly(gallol), a synthetic tannin. Hydrogen bonding between PEG and poly(gallol) creates a complexed layer around the SPIO that decreases the interaction of solute water with the SPIO, attenuating its magnetic resonance relaxivity. The complexed interpolymer nanoparticle is in an OFF state (decreased T2 contrast), where the contrast agent has a low T2 relaxivity of 7 ± 2 mM−1 s−1. In the presence of superoxides, the poly(gallol) is oxidized and the polymers decomplex, allowing solute water to again interact with the SPIO, representing an ON state (increased T2 contrast) with a T2 relaxivity of 70 ± 10 mM−1 s−1. These contrast agents show promise as effective sensors for diseases characterized in part by oxidative stress such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, and cancer.
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, activatable contrast, nanoparticles, oxidative stress, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
Graphical abstract

1. Introduction
The transverse relaxation time (T2) in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characterizes the time required for dephasing of proton spins [1, 2]. T2 can be decreased by exogenous contrast agents, which are under active investigation in the field of molecular imaging to target molecular markers of diseases [3, 4]. Since faster dephasing, i.e. a decrease in T2, results in diminished signal, these contrast agents are described as showing negative contrast. One common approach to achieving accumulation of the contrast agent at a disease site is to actively target a receptor or biomolecule [5–7], causing a correlation between local contrast and the prevalence of a disease-specific target [8]. Alternatively, recent progress in activatable MR molecular imaging has achieved a type of functional imaging in which a contrast agent exhibits greater or lesser relaxivity, that is, effect on T1 or T2, in response to environmental factors such as the presence of an enzyme [9], light [10], temperature [11], or pH level [12]. In this sense, such activatable agents act as microenvironment biosensors.
A great deal of recent work has demonstrated activatable agents based on paramagnetic gadolinium [13–22], but there are few reports of such use of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs), which exhibit particularly high T2 relaxivity (r2) and biocompatibility [23–25]. Coatings greatly affect the relaxivity of the SPIOs [26–30], providing an opportunity for the tailored design of SPIO-based biosensors. Unlike gadolinium, SPIOs generally have low T1 relaxivity but high T2 and T2* relaxivity. T2 relaxation refers to decay of transverse magnetization caused by spin-spin relaxation, whereas T2* relaxation refers to transverse magnetization decay caused by a combination of spin-spin relaxation and magnetic field inhomogeneity. Since the contribution of SPIOs to magnetic field inhomogeneity is long-range (µm to mm), these effects are likely much harder to silence using a nanoparticle surface coating. Therefore, our investigations primarily focused on the T2 relaxivity of coated SPIOs.
Here we describe the development of an SPIO-based activatable MR contrast agent incorporating a polymer coating that is responsive to oxidative stress produced by local reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are known to contribute to the progression of a number of pathologies [31–33]. Oxidative stress can lead to chronic inflammation, as is seen in numerous diseases including atherosclerosis [34–36], cancer [37, 38], diabetes [34, 35, 39], and pulmonary diseases [40–42]. Thus, a contrast agent sensitive to oxidative stress may be of potential utility in the diagnosis and ongoing evaluation of a number of diseases.
We present the synthesis and characterization of SPIOs with a coating of interpolymer complexed (IPC) poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(gallol), a synthetic dextran-based tannin-inspired polymer [43]. Hydrophilic PEG is able to colloidally stabilize nanoparticles and increase blood circulation time by reducing opsonization and immune response [44–46]. Poly(gallol) polymers are designed to mimic the natural structure of tannins, exhibiting anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-microbial properties [43, 47]. In this nanoparticle, interpolymer complexation relies on hydrogen bonding between PEG and poly(gallol) (Figure 1A). We demonstrate that the presence of solute water surrounding the SPIOs is reduced upon coating them with the complexed PEG and poly(gallol), greatly decreasing their T2 relaxivity. However, when reactive oxygen species oxidize the phenolic groups on the poly(gallol), the polymer side groups lose the hydroxyl needed for complexation with PEG (Figure 1A). The disruption of this hydrogen bonding between the two polymers upon oxidation of the poly(gallol) allows for more water to reach the SPIO, and the T2 relaxivity is regained.
Figure 1.
(A) Poly(gallol) and poly(ethylene glycol) interact via hydrogen bonding when complexed. In the presence of ROS such as superoxides, the poly(gallol) is oxidized and the two polymers can no longer maintain this interaction, leading to decomplexation. (B) During polymer preparation, poly(gallol) is converted to sodium poly(gallate) to improve solubility and storage. During IPC-SPIO synthesis, poly(gallate) salts are returned to poly(gallol)s by adding phosphate buffer to allow for complexation between the polymer and PEG, as illustrated in (A).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
The metallic precursors iron (II) chloride (FeCl2), iron (III) chloride (FeCl3), N,N’-Diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC), 4-dimethylamino-pyridine (DMAP), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dichloromethane (DCM), dimethylformamide (DMF), Pd black, sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), dextran, xanthine oxidase from bovine milk (XOD) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 3,4,5-tris(benzyloxy)benzoic acid (TBBA) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). Ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, 28-30 wt%) was purchased from BDH (Poole, Dorset, UK). Polyethylene glycol with various molecular weights was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Alfa Aesar (Heysham, Lancashire, UK). Phosphotungstic acid hydrate powder was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Heysham, Lancashire, UK). Sodium phosphate monobasic, sodium phosphate dibasic, and potassium hydroxide (KOH) were purchased from Amresco (Solon, OH, USA). Hypoxanthine (HX) was purchased from Research Products International (RPI) Corp. (Mt. Prospect, IL, USA). All chemicals used were of analytical grade.
2.2. Preparation of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIOs)
For the whole process (Scheme 1), N2 purged DI water was used to minimize any unexpected oxidation. A modified coprecipitation method was used for preparation of SPIOs [24, 48–51]. First, 2 mmol of FeCl3 and 1 mmol of FeCl2 were dissolved in two separate beakers containing 50 mL of deionized (DI) water each. The FeCl2 solution was added dropwise to the FeCl3 solution with magnetic stirring. The resulting 100 mL mixture of FeCl2 and FeCl3 solutions was mixed well for 30 minutes under a nitrogen atmosphere with vigorous magnetic stirring. The mixture was heated to 80°C using a silicone oil bath, at which point 30 mL of 1M aqueous NH4OH solution was added dropwise and left to react for 5 hours under nitrogen atmosphere. The solution was then cooled to room temperature and sonicated in a bath sonicator for 1 hour. Afterwards, the solution was washed with DI water until the pH was approximately 7. The black precipitate was separated via magnetic decantation and centrifugation three times. The final product was redispersed into DI water to create a suspension containing 2 mg of SPIOs per mL.
Scheme 1.
Schematic representing formulation of uncoated-SPIOs (step 1), PEGylated SPIOs (step 2), complexed IPC-SPIOs (step 3), and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs (step 4).
2.3. Preparation of PEGylated SPIOs
PEGylated SPIOs were formed via adsorption of PEG on the surface of SPIOs. To vary the PEG surface coverage per particle, four separate PEG solutions were created with PEG 6 kDa, PEG 10 kDa, PEG 35 kDa, and PEG 300 kDa. PEG with lower molecular weight was expected to form a less dense polymer coating, while PEG with higher molecular weight was expected to form a high-density polymer coating on the surface of particles [52]. Each PEG solution was mixed with SPIOs at a PEG:SPIO molar ratio of approximately 18,000:1, 9,000:1, 4500:1, and 150:1 (corresponding to PEG: Fe3O4 molar ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:64) for 6, 10, 35, and 300 kDa PEG molecular weights, respectively. The suspension of SPIOs and PEG solution was stirred for 24 hours with a magnetic stirrer at 1000 rpm. The PEGylated SPIOs were separated with a magnet, and the supernatant was decanted. The solution was washed 3 times with DI water to remove any excess polymer.
2.4. Preparation of poly(gallol)
Poly(gallol) was prepared as described previously [43]. Briefly, TBBA molecules were conjugated to a linear dextran backbone of either 40 or 200 kDa molecular weight and were then converted to phenols via a palladium black catalyzed deprotection reaction. The conjugation of BBAs used an optimized Steglich esterification to bind the carboxyl groups on the BBAs to the free hydroxyl groups on dextran. The type of BBA used and its feed ratio determined the molecular structure of the final polymer and the density of phenolic units. In order to ensure complete deprotection, the feed ratio of free hydroxyl groups on dextran to TBBA was limited to 2:1. Higher degrees of substitution resulted in an inefficient and incomplete deprotection. Poly(gallol)s were dissolved in a 1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 8) to convert the phenolic units to phenoxide salts, making them water soluble while limiting self-complexation and oxidation during storage. These poly(gallate) salts were lyophilized for storage until use [43].
2.5. Preparation of complexed IPC-SPIOs
Complexed IPC-SPIOs were formed by hydrogen bonding between PEG and poly(gallol) [43]. Uncoated SPIOs and PEG 6, 10, 35, and 300 kDa-SPIOs were separately diluted to achieve a concentration of 2 mg of SPIOs per mL. The lyophilized 40 kDa and 200 kDa sodium poly(gallate)s were reconstituted in deionized water at a concentration of 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 mg/mL. Each suspension of uncoated SPIOs or PEGylated SPIOs was mixed with an equal volume of sodium poly(gallate) polymer solution for one hour. Complexation was initiated upon addition of sodium phosphate buffer at a concentration of 1 M and pH 7.4 to convert the poly(gallate) salts into poly(gallol) polymers capable of hydrogen bonding with PEG. In order to have a final concentration of approximately 400 µM of iron and 100 mM of sodium phosphate buffer, a volume ratio of 9:9:2 SPIO suspension: poly(gallate) solution: sodium phosphate buffer was used. Complexation proceeded over several hours, as monitored by UV/Vis spectroscopy, detailed below, prior to characterization of particles.
2.6. Preparation of decomplexed IPC-SPIOs
The decomplexation reaction required an oxidative environment, which was created using xanthine oxidase and hypoxanthine [43]. XOD is an enzyme that produces superoxide (O2−) in the presence of its substrate, HX. When superoxide oxidizes the hydroxyl groups on the poly(gallol), the hydrogen bonding necessary for complexation is disrupted. A 30 mM solution of HX was created by dissolving HX in a 50 mM aqueous stock solution of KOH. Subsequently, the XOD (0.015 units) solution was mixed with 100 mM phosphate buffer, to provide excess oxidative species to the reaction [43]. The complexed IPC-SPIOs were added to HX and XOD for decomplexation at 37°C. In order to have a final concentration of approximately 400 µM of iron and 100 mM of phosphate buffer, a ratio of 20 parts complexed IPC-SPIO suspension: 2 parts HX solution : 0.7 parts XOD solution was used. Serial dilutions were prepared and used fresh.
2.7. Characterization
2.7.1. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM 2100F, Japan) was performed at a voltage of 200 kV to assess the size and morphology of the synthesized particles. Several drops of the diluted suspension were placed on the surface of an ultrathin carbon film on lacey carbon support film grid (400 mesh, Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA, USA). For negative staining, a few drops of 2% phosphotungstic acid aqueous solution were placed on top of the sample TEM grids. The sample TEM grids were dried in a vacuum desiccator overnight. During TEM imaging, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used for a quantitative elemental analysis of uncoated SPIOs (Fe3O4). ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the particle size of uncoated SPIOs and PEG-SPIOs [53].
2.7.2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Uncoated SPIOs and PEG-SPIOs were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Supra 55 VP, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with an accelerating voltage of 2 kV. Each dried sample was placed on a metallic pin stub with adhesive and coated with carbon (Cressington 208C High Vacuum Turbo Carbon Coater, Ted Pella Inc.).
2.7.3. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta-potential
The hydrodynamic size (diameter), size distribution, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta-potential of each sample were determined by dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer, Malvern NanoZS, Worcestershire, UK) at room temperature. For DLS, all samples were suspended in water at a SPIO concentration of 0.05 mg/mL, and placed in a folded capillary cuvette cell.
2.7.4. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)
The hydrodynamic size (diameter) and concentration of each sample were analyzed by NTA (Malvern NanoSight NS300, Worcestershire, UK) using a 532 nm continuous wave (CW) green laser. All samples were introduced into the sample chamber through the inlet tubing by disposable syringe. All measurements were performed at room temperature. The scientific CMOS (SCMOS) camera captured movement of the nanoparticles’ Brownian motion. Then, NTA software (NTA 3.2 Dev Build 3.2.16) was used to identify, track, and size particles individually within each frame.
2.7.5. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR Nicolet 8700 Spectrometer) was used to examine the characteristic bands of PEG 300 kDa, 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol), complexed IPC-SPIOs, and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs. PEG signal was outside the detectable range with the Nicolet Spectrometer, so the PEG spectrum was instead collected using attenuated total reflectance (ATR), which resulted in narrower peaks due to the differences in data collection modes. Samples were deposited onto polished 13mm × 2mm KBr discs (International Crystal Labs, NJ, USA), and spectra were acquired in the range of approximately 2000 - 650 cm−1.
2.7.6 Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (Synergy H1 Microplate reader, BioTek, VT, USA) was used to examine the turbidity of various formulations with 40 and 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) during complexation and in response to superoxide by measuring the absorbance of each sample at 550 nm and 37°C. For this study, three different concentrations (1, 0.5, 0.25 mg/mL) of poly(gallol) were used and the control lacked phosphate buffer. Relative absorbance was calculated as the change in absorbance divided by the absorbance at zero time.
2.7.7. Measurement of magnetic resonance relaxivity
MR relaxivity of suspensions of nanocomplexes was measured. To determine T2, T2*, and T1 relaxivities, samples of particles were suspended at various concentrations in phosphate buffer in a custom built, susceptibility-matched ULTEM 96-well plate [54] and scanned on a 3 T MR scanner using a knee coil (Philips 3T Achieva MRI, Best, Netherlands). In preliminary studies, complexed IPC-SPIOs made with 40 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) and PEG 6, 10, 35, or 300 kDa were scanned. In studies with 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol), un-complexed, complexed, and decomplexed PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs were prepared and scanned. Uncoated SPIOs, uncoated SPIOs exposed to poly(gallol), and water were scanned as controls. A volume of 700 µL of each sample was placed into a well of the custom plate with approximate concentrations of 50, 100, 200, and 400 µM of iron. MR images were acquired for a single, 10 mm thick slice with coronal orientation (i.e. in a plane parallel to the surface of the well plate) and with a field of view of 75 × 75 mm. T2-weighted images of particle suspensions were acquired using a multi-spin echo sequence with echo time (TE) = 7.5 ms, matrix size (MTX) = 256 × 256 pixels, echo train length (ETL) = 32, repetition time (TR) = 680 ms and number of averages (NSA) = 2, resulting in a total scan time of 5.8 minutes. T2*-weighted images of particle suspensions were acquired using a multi-gradient echo sequence with 25 degree flip angle, TE = 3.9 ms, ETL = 30, MTX = 244 × 195 pixels, TR = 500 ms and NSA = 2, resulting in a total scan time of 3.3 minutes. T1-weighted images of particle suspensions were acquired using a Look-Locker gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequence with 14 degree flip angle, TE = 4.5 ms, MTX = 192 × 176 pixels, EPI readout (ETL = 3), TR = 4 s, 55 equally-spaced inversion times (TI) = 50, 100, …, 2750 ms and NSA = 1, resulting in a total scan time of 3.9 minutes. For studies done with 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol), iron concentrations were measured after MR scanning by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES).
After obtaining the MR images, regions of interest (ROI) were drawn for each of the 96 wells, and the average pixel intensity in each ROI as a function of echo time (TE) or inversion time (TI) was measured using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) [53]. These data, omitting the first echo time, were fit to the following T2, T2*, and T1 equations using MATLAB® (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA):
Here, A is a variable offset that partially accounts for the presence of Rician noise in the magnitude MR images while M0 is the T1-weighted proton density, B accounts for incomplete inversion and can be initially set to “1” and T1* is an apparent T1 related to the true T1 by the equation 1/T1 = 1/T1* + ln(cos(α))/τ. Here, α is the Look-Locker flip angle (14 degrees) and τ is the Look-Locker inter-pulse delay (50 ms) [55].
2.7.8. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) assay for iron content
After MR scans, particle suspensions were diluted 1:1000 in 3% HNO3, and the iron content was determined using ICP-OES (Varian Vista-MPX CCD Simultaneous ICP-OES, Varian Inc., Melbourne, Australia). Relaxivity was calculated as the slope of the linear regression of R2 = 1/T2R2* = 1/T2*, or R1 = 1/T1 versus iron concentration, and the standard error of the regression was reported.
2.7.9. Statistics
Mean size data were compared using a one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Student’s t-test with Tukey corrections to determine the p-values. A one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Student’s t-test with Tukey corrections were used to compare mean relativities of different sample types. All statistical analysis was done in Microsoft Excel® (Redmond, WA, USA) or MATLAB® (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation and characterization of nanoparticles
As described previously [43], the synthesis of poly(gallol) consisted of conjugating benzyloxy benzoic acids as side groups to a linear dextran backbone of either 40 or 200 kDa molecular weight and converting the benzoic acids to phenols via a palladium black catalyzed deprotection reaction. Prior to lyophilization, the poly(gallol) was converted to sodium poly(gallate) by dissolution in a 1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 8) to change the phenolic units to phenoxide salts, which are water soluble and more easily storable (Figure 1B).
As illustrated in Scheme 1, the SPIOs were created by coprecipitation of FeCl2, FeCl3, and NH4OH in DI water (step 1) [24, 48–51]. Despite many advantages of the aqueous coprecipitation method for SPIOs synthesis such as ease of implementation, fast reaction, less use of hazardous materials, and high yield, resultant particles are typically quite polydisperse. SPIOs were PEGylated by adsorption of PEG of various molecular weights to the SPIO surface, and the poly(gallate) polymer solutions at various concentrations were mixed with the particles. Complexation was initiated by adding pH 7.4 phosphate buffer to protonate the poly(gallate) polymers back to poly(gallol)s (Figure 1B), allowing for hydrogen bonds to form between the poly(gallol) and PEG at the surface of the SPIOs to form a thick coating [43, 49]. The response of IPC-SPIOs to oxidation was observed in the presence of superoxide (O2−) created by the reaction of XOD and HX. Complexed and decomplexed particles were analyzed extensively, as detailed below.
Uncoated SPIOs, PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs, and PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid aqueous solution were imaged using TEM; representative images are shown in Figure 2A-C. SPIOs were spherical in shape, although particles clumped as an artifact of drying (Figure 2A-C), with the PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs exhibiting a gray halo around the darker SPIO particles, attributable to the polymer coating (Figure 2B). The negative staining technique was used to study the morphological shape and thickness of the dry-state of the polymer coating (Figure 2C). From the TEM images, the mean and standard deviation of particle size for uncoated SPIOs and the thickness of the PEG coating were measured to be 11 ± 4 nm (n=101) and 2.9 ± 1 nm (n=49), respectively. The EDS spectrum of the uncoated SPIOs (Figure 2D) showed peaks for iron and oxygen as expected, while the grid and Si (Li) detector caused peaks for carbon, copper, and silicon. These EDS data did not show any additional elemental peaks from impurities.
Figure 2.
TEM images (scale bar of 20 nm) of uncoated SPIOs (A), PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs (B), and PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (C), and EDS spectrum of uncoated-SPIOs (Fe3O4) (D). SEM images of uncoated SPIOs (E) and PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs (F), scale bar is 100 nm. Diameters were quantified (Table 1).
Uncoated SPIOs and PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs were also imaged by SEM (Figure 2E-F), which showed particles with a relatively spherical morphology and an average diameter slightly increasing with the addition of the polymer coatings from around 19 ± 3 nm (n = 50) for uncoated SPIOs to around 22 ± 3 nm (n = 50) for PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs. The complexed and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs were not suitable for imaging by TEM or SEM due to degradation of the polymer coatings under the electron beam.
As summarized in Table 1, nanoparticle hydrodynamic size was measured by DLS and NTA, and zeta potential was measured using electrophoretic DLS. NTA and DLS techniques measured the hydrodynamic radius in aqueous solutions, which was larger than the dry size measured by SEM and TEM due to solvated polymers and bound water. The mean hydrodynamic diameter of particles increased with the addition of PEG and poly(gallol) to the complex. Additionally, particle size increased during decomplexation, likely demonstrating swelling behavior. The zeta potential of uncoated SPIOs in DI water was −34 mV, similar to published values [56–58]. PEG-SPIOs had a slightly increased zeta potential of −27 mV, compared to uncoated SPIOs, indicating charge shielding due to particle surface coating with PEG [59, 60]. The zeta potential also increased towards neutral after interpolymer complexation with poly(gallol) and again after decomplexation of the IPC-SPIOs. The increase in size of the SPIO polymer coatings moves the slipping plane farther from the SPIO surface, which may explain why the zeta potential shifts towards neutral [61, 62].
Table 1.
Hydrodynamic size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ζP) of uncoated-SPIOs, PEG-SPIOs, complexed IPC-SPIOs, and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs with PEG 300 kDa and 0.25 mg/mL 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) measured in triplicate using a Malvern Zetasizer ZS. Sizes also were measured by TEM, SEM, and NTA. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate tests. The sizes and zeta potentials of the four types of nanoparticles were significantly different (p<0.05).
| Nanocomplexes | TEM Size (nm) |
SEM Size (nm) |
NTA Size (nm) |
DLS Size (nm) |
DLS PDI |
DLS ζP (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncoated SPIOs | 11 ± 4 | 19 ± 3 | 81 ± 21 | 56 ± 1 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | −34 ± 1 |
|
|
||||||
| PEG-SPIOs | 3 ± 1 (coating) | 22 ± 3 | 106 ± 28 | 68 ± 2 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | −27.7 ± 0.4 |
|
|
||||||
| Complexed IPC-SPIOs | - | - | 205 ± 50 | 150 ± 3 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | −10.4 ± 0.4 |
|
|
||||||
| Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs | - | - | 240 ± 60 | 258 ± 1 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | −6.7 ± 0.5 |
FT-IR spectroscopy was performed to demonstrate the successful attachment of PEG and complexation of poly(gallol) on the particles. Figure 3 shows FT-IR spectra of PEG 300 kDa (A), 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) (B), and complexed (C) and decomplexed (D) IPC-SPIOs (synthesized with PEG 300 kDa and 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol)). The PEG spectrum showed peaks for CH2 bending at 1466 cm−1 and 1341 cm−1, C-O-C, OH, and C-O-H stretching at 1279 cm−1, C-O stretching at 1241 cm−1, OH and C-O-H stretching at 1098 cm−1, and C-H bending at 960 cm−1 and 841 cm−1. Poly(gallol) exhibited absorbance at 1590-1700 cm−1, due to C=O stretching in the ester bonds, 1415-1570 cm−1 due to the C=C stretching in the aromatic rings, 1003-1390 cm−1 due to the combination of C-O stretching and in-plane aromatic C-H bending, and 750-900 cm−1 due to the out-of-plane aromatic C-H bending. Figure 3 shows that the peaks in the range of 1590-1700 cm−1 characteristic of poly(gallol) (B) and peaks in the range of 840-960 cm−1 characteristic of PEG (A) were present in the spectrum of complexed IPC-SPIOs (C). This along with the previously published data [43] implies that the two polymers, PEG and poly(gallol), have entangled and created a complexed network. The FT-IR spectrum of decomplexed IPC-SPIOs shows significant overlap between characteristic peaks of PEG and poly(gallol), indicating that both polymers are still present in the swollen particles. Residual xanthine oxidase, hypoxanthine, and ammonium sulfate with peaks at 1632 cm−1, 1680 cm−1, and 1420-1450 cm−1 and 1100 cm−1, respectively, may contribute to peak broadening in Figure 3D (decomplexed IPC-SPIOs).
Figure 3.
Fourier transform infrared spectra of PEG 300 kDa, 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol), complexed IPC-SPIOs and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs synthesized with PEG 300 kDa and 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol).
Based on previous work with IPC particles without SPIOs [43], we initially hypothesized that during decomplexation, the oxidized poly(gallol) would fully detach from the particles due to a disruption of hydrogen bonding between PEG and poly(gallol). However, the particle size, FT-IR spectra, and zeta potential of IPC-SPIOs indicated that decomplexation-dependent swelling of the particles likely occurred as some, but not all, hydrogen bonding was lost between poly(gallol) and PEG. Since the design of the nanocomplexes for MR imaging depends on access of water to the central SPIO, swelling of the particles during decomplexation of IPC-SPIOs was expected to demonstrate a substantial change in relaxivity, as was confirmed in our MR studies below.
3.2. MRI-Based T2-weighted deactivation of complexed IPC-SPIOs
A preliminary investigation of the MR properties of complexed IPC-SPIOs using 40 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol), a SPIO core of 11 ± 4 nm and varying molecular weights of PEG was conducted in a 3T scanner by suspending particles in water in a custom well plate. Complexed IPC-SPIOs were synthesized by separately combining 1 mg/mL 40 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) with serial dilutions of uncoated SPIOs, PEG 6 kDa-SPIOs, PEG 10 kDa-SPIOs, PEG 35 kDa-SPIOs, or PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs. For these samples, measurement of iron content was not performed, so the absolute relaxivities are not reported here. The MR signal arising from complexed PEG 6 kDa-SPIOs, PEG 10 kDa-SPIOs, and PEG 35 kDa-SPIOs samples were all concentration dependent, based on the serial dilutions made. However, the MR signal from the nanocomplexes that made use of 300 kDa molecular weight PEG did not significantly vary with concentration, indicating that these complexes had much lower relaxivity than the other complexes. This lower relaxivity in the complexed, OFF-state is a desirable property for our contrast agents. Uncoated SPIOs mixed with poly(gallol) had the highest signal, likely indicating that the large reduction in relaxivity observed when PEG-SPIOs are mixed with poly(gallol) is due to interpolymer complexation, not merely coating the particle surface with poly(gallol). Low and intermediate molecular weight PEG was not studied further due to its intermediate effect on relaxivity when complexed in the IPC-SPIOs; further studies were conducted with PEG 300 kDa.
To further understand the complexation and decomplexation of these nanoparticles, the UV/Vis absorbance of various formulations was monitored over time at 550 nm for changes in turbidity, which is indicative of nanocomplex size. SPIOs coated with PEG 300 kDa were complexed with poly(gallol) synthesized with either a 40 or 200 kDa dextran backbone at three separate concentrations. Absorbance was measured for 6 hours during complexation (Figure 4). Turbidity increased before leveling off or slightly dropping, likely indicating the completion of complexation. The negative control that lacked phosphate buffer showed insignificant change in turbidity (Figure 4). Following 6 hours of monitoring complexation, IPC-SPIOs were exposed to the superoxide product of HX and XOD to initiate decomplexation. During decomplexation, when poly(gallol)s are oxidized and lose hydrogen bonding with PEG, the absorbance at 550 nm increases, which likely indicated swelling. Controls lacking superoxide showed minimal change in turbidity, confirming minimal if any spontaneous decomplexation within this time period. Furthermore, these absorbance data indicated that the 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) IPC-SPIOs complexed readily and were much more responsive in swelling in the presence of superoxides compared to 40 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) IPC-SPIOs. It is hypothesized that the higher molecular weight dextran backbone promoted more hydrogen bonding with the high molecular weight PEG, which could then be disrupted due to oxidation of the poly(gallol). Subsequent studies utilized 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) as this formed IPC-SPIOs that had greater swelling during decomplexation and were expected to result in more pronounced changes in relaxivity in response to oxidation.
Figure 4.
Relative change in UV/Vis absorbance at 550 nm over time compared to zero time, indicative of increased turbidity upon formation of IPC-SPIOs containing PEG 300 kDa and three different concentrations of 40 or 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) (A, C) and decomplexation in the presence of superoxides (B,D). For complexation, the controls contained all substituents but lack phosphate buffer. For decomplexation, the controls contained complexed particles but no superoxides. Data presented are mean +/− standard deviation, n = 3.
3.3. MRI-Based T2-weighted activation of complexed IPC-SPIOs
Finally, the MR relaxivity of IPC-SPIO particles containing 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) complexed with 300 kDa PEG was measured using a 3T scanner, and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) was used to measure iron content. Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs were formed by placing complexed IPC-SPIOs in an oxidative environment created by XOD and HX. MR relaxivities of uncoated SPIOs, PEG-SPIOs, complexed IPC-SPIOs, and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs were measured (Figure 5) using a spin echo sequence with varying TE, with images of each complex at the highest iron concentration tested shown in Figure 5B. Negative contrast agents result in rapid loss of image intensity with increasing TE as a consequence of shortened T2. Uncoated SPIOs (1) had the highest T2 relaxivity of 470 ± 30 mM−1·s−1 while PEG-SPIOs (2) had a relaxivity of 350 ± 30 mM−1·s−1. Despite low PDI values measured from DLS, the high r2 value of uncoated SPIOs is likely due to polydispersity of the sample. Additionally, the effect of poly(gallol) concentration on T2 relaxivity was measured by varying the concentrations of poly(gallol) (1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 mg/mL) complexed with PEG 300 kDa-SPIOs (Table 2). A poly(gallol) concentration of 0.25 mg/mL yielded the greatest difference between complexed and decomplexed relaxivities, with a complexed relaxivity of 7 ± 2 mM−1·s−1 and decomplexed relaxivity of 70 ± 10 mM−1·s−1. Spin echo images of the complexed IPC-SPIOs (lane 3 in Fig. 8B) decreased in intensity only at long TE, indicating that the polymer coating greatly attenuated the relaxivity of the SPIOs. Finally, images of the decomplexed particles (lane 4) show a substantial increase in T2 relaxivity. This recovery of relaxivity is dependent upon the concentration of poly(gallol), as shown in Table 2, with the ratio of decomplexed to complexed relaxivity being 2.5 ± 0.2a, 5.7 ± 0.6b, 10.3 ± 0.4c, 10.6 ± 1.3c, and 7.2 ± 1.7b,c with poly(gallol) concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 mg/mL, respectively (mean ± standard error, results that do not share letter superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05)). These data indicate that IPC-SPIOs can be formulated to increase relaxivity up to 10-fold upon exposure to physiologically relevant ROS such as superoxides.
Figure 5.
Relaxation rate (R2) plotted against the measured concentration of iron for SPIO particles coated with PEG 300 kDa and complexed with 0.25 mg/mL of 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol), showing low relaxivity when complexed and recovering relaxivity when decomplexed (A) and T2-weighted MR images at the highest tested iron concentration of uncoated SPIOs (1), PEG-SPIOs (PEG 300 kDa) (2), complexed IPC-SPIOs (PEG 300 kDa) (3), and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs (PEG 300 kDa) (4) showing increasing echo time (TE 7.5 ms) from left to right (B).
Table 2.
T2, T2*, and T1 relaxivities of uncoated SPIOs (n = 4), PEG-SPIOs (n = 4), complexed IPC-SPIOs, and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs with PEG 300 kDa and 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) concentrations of 1 mg/mL (n = 12), 0.5 mg/mL (n = 4), 0.25 mg/mL (n = 4), 0.125 mg/mL (n = 4), and 0.0625 mg/mL (n = 4). Relaxivity expressed as linear regression best fit ± standard error of the regression.
| Formulation | Poly(gallol) concentration |
r2(mM−1·s−1) | r2* (mM−1·s−1) | r1 (mM−1·s−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncoated SPIOs | -- | 470 ± 30 | 710 ± 240 | 4.9 ± 0.5 |
|
|
||||
| PEG-SPIOs | -- | 350 ± 30 | 590 ± 60 | 4.3 ± 0.3 |
|
|
||||
| Complexed IPC-SPIOs | 1 mg/mL | 24 ± 4 * | 190 ± 50 * | 0.91 ± 0.04 * |
|
|
||||
| Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs | 1 mg/mL | 60 ± 4 *† | 290 ± 50§ | 0.84 ± 0.02 * |
|
|
||||
| Complexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.5 mg/mL | 14 ± 7 * | 200 ± 60 * | 0.85 ± 0.05 * |
|
|
||||
| Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.5 mg/mL | 80 ± 20 *++ | 300 ± 80 § | 1.23 ± 0.02 *† |
|
|
||||
| Complexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.25 mg/mL | 7 ± 2 * | 230 ± 50 * | 0.70 ± 0.04 * |
|
|
||||
| Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.25 mg/mL | 70 ± 10 *† | 240 ± 50 * | 1.14 ±0.07 *† |
|
|
||||
| Complexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.125 mg/mL | 6 ± 8 * | 210 ± 50 * | 0.65 ± 0.05 * |
|
|
||||
| Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.125 mg/mL | 66 ± 8 *† | 230 ± 50 * | 1.13 ± 0.03 *† |
|
|
||||
| Complexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.0625 mg/mL | 7 ± 12 * | 280 ± 40 § | 0.4 ± 0.2 * |
|
|
||||
| Decomplexed IPC-SPIOs | 0.0625 mg/mL | 51 ± 12 *++ | 210 ± 50 * | 1.13 ± 0.03 *++ |
If denoted, within categories of T2, T2*, and T1 relaxivities, values are significantly different (§ p<0.05, * p<0.005) than the PEG-SPIO relaxivity; relaxivity for decomplexed particles is significantly different (++ p <0.05, † p<0.005) than complexed particles at the matched poly(gallol) concentration.
Our data indicate that SPIOs experienced increased shielding from water when surrounded by the complexed poly(gallol)-PEG IPC, which limited the interaction of solute water with the SPIO surface. Previous work by Bao et al. described the dependence of T2 relaxivity on the thickness of the SPIO surface coating [26, 28]. They found that a coating creates two distinct layers around the SPIO surface: 1) an exclusion radius immediately surrounding the SPIO that water cannot penetrate, and 2) a slow compartment radius in which water diffusion is slowed but water is not excluded. Their Monte Carlo simulations modeled the movement of water protons in a field with SPIOs and showed that increasing the exclusion radius dramatically decreases the effective T2 relaxivity of the particle. However, increasing the thickness of the slow compartment radius slightly increases the T2 relaxivity because slower water diffusion allows for increased residence time of water molecules within the inhomogeneous magnetic field produced by the iron oxide core. This slow compartment effect is outweighed by the negative effect of the exclusion radius on T2 relaxivity, and T2 relaxivity decreases to near zero when the exclusion radius of the coating reaches 50 nm (for a 6.6 nm diameter SPIO core), regardless of the slow compartment radius thickness. The data presented in this paper confirm experimentally that the formation of a ~70 nm interpolymer coating created by the 0.25 mg/mL 200 kDa dextran backbone poly(gallol) and PEG 300 kDa around the 11 nm SPIO core reduced the particle's T2 relaxivity compared to the uncoated SPIO by approximately 99%. In essence, particle complexation turns OFF the T2 contrast-causing ability of the particles. The nature of the hydrogen bond- based complexation between the poly(gallol) and PEG excludes water from the complex. Due to the pre- mixing of PEG-SPIOs and sodium poly(gallate) prior to the addition of phosphate buffer to convert the poly(gallate)s to poly(gallol)s, which initiates the complexation, we hypothesize that PEG and poly(gallol) are intertwined as a coating on the SPIO surface. PEG-poly(gallol) hydrogen bonding is disrupted upon oxidation of the poly(gallol) side groups, leading to particle swelling that concomitantly decreases the exclusion radius of the decomplexed IPC-SPIOs and increases the T2 relaxivity. Despite the fact that the hydrodynamic radius of the particles grows with swelling upon oxidation, the exclusion radius—the distance that water cannot penetrate—decreases. We speculate that SPIO contrast is activatable upon exposure to physiologically relevant ROS as particles decomplex and the exclusion radius of the IPC-SPIOs decrease.
As expected, the OFF/ON activation of this system was not exhibited in T2* relaxation. Since the contribution of SPIOs to magnetic field inhomogeneity in T2* contrast is long-range (µm to mm), these effects are likely much harder to silence using a nanoparticle surface coating. T2* relaxivities of IPC-coated particles were significantly smaller compared to PEG-coated particles, but there was no statistically significant difference in T2* relaxivity between complexed and decomplexed IPC-SPIOs at any of the tested poly(gallol) concentrations. Finally, T1 relaxivity was impacted by the IPC coating in a similar manner to T2with complexed IPC-SPIOs exhibiting a statistically significant lower T1 relaxivity than PEG-SPIOs at all poly(gallol) concentrations. Also, the complexed particles had a lower relaxivity than decomplexed particles at all poly(gallol) concentrations except 1 mg/mL. However, the relative change in T1 relaxivity upon decomplexation was much smaller than that seen for T2 relaxivity, which is attributable to the known dominant effect of SPIO particles on dephasing through establishment of microinhomogeneities in the local magnetic field.
4. CONCLUSIONS
This study shows the successful creation of an activatable MR contrast agent based on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles were synthesized using the coprecipitation method and were coated with PEG via adsorption. PEGylated SPIOs were complexed with poly(gallol) to produce complexed IPC-SPIOs. Finally, complexed IPC-SPIOs were decomplexed in an oxidative environment. The complexed IPC-SPIOs had a low T2 relaxivity, indicating that the polymer coating shielded the SPIO core from interacting with surrounding protons; this represents the OFF stage of the activatable agent. The decomplexed IPC-SPIOs showed a partial but substantial recovery of T2 relaxivity and represent the ON stage of the agent. DLS, zeta potential, and UV/Vis spectroscopy results support evidence of a swelling upon decomplexation. This activatable characteristic of the particles carries the potential to permit measurement of local oxidative stress in a variety of disease states.
Highlights.
An activatable T2 magnetic resonance contrast agent has been created.
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are encapsulated in complexed polymers.
The complexed polymers swell when oxidized, activating the contrast agent.
The activation is confirmed with measurements of MR relaxivity and size changes.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this work was provided by the NIH (1R21EB017504-01) and by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (KFW and RGS). Equipment usage was supported by the Binghamton University Analytical and Diagnostics Laboratory. The authors thank Nancy Pleshko, PhD, who provided consultation on FT-IR data analysis.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Hengerer A, Grimm J. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging. Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal. 2006;2:e8. doi: 10.2349/biij.2.2.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gimi B, Pathak AP, Ackerstaff E, Glunde K, Artemov D, Bhujwalla ZM. Molecular Imaging of Cancer: Applications of Magnetic Resonance Methods. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2005;93:784–99. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2005.844266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morawski AM, Lanza GA, Wickline SA. Targeted contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2005;16:89–92. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.James ML, Gambhir SS. A MOLECULAR IMAGING PRIMER: MODALITIES, IMAGING AGENTS, AND APPLICATIONS. Physiological Reviews. 2012;92:897–965. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chou S-W, Shau Y-H, Wu P-C, Yang Y-S, Shieh D-B, Chen C-C. In Vitro and in Vivo Studies of FePt Nanoparticles for Dual Modal CT/MRI Molecular Imaging. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132:13270–8. doi: 10.1021/ja1035013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Capala J, Bouchelouche K. Molecular imaging of HER2-positive breast cancer - a step toward an individualized "Image and Treat" strategy. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2010;22:559–66. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32833f8c3a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Serkova NJ, Renner B, Larsen BA, Stoldt CR, Hasebroock KM, Bradshaw-Pierce EL, et al. Targeted Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Molecular MR Imaging in Mice. Radiology. 2010;255:517–26. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee GY, Kim J-H, Choi KY, Yoon HY, Kim K, Kwon IC, et al. Hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for active targeting atherosclerosis. Biomaterials. 2015;53:341–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duimstra JA, Femia FJ, Meade TJ. A Gadolinium Chelate for Detection of β-Glucuronidase: A Self-Immolative Approach. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127:12847–55. doi: 10.1021/ja042162r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Osborne EA, Jarrett BR, Tu C, Louie AY. Modulation of T2 Relaxation Time by Light-Induced, Reversible Aggregation of Magnetic Nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society Communications. 2010;132:5934–5. doi: 10.1021/ja100254m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang K, Liu M, Tong X, Sun N, Zhou L, Cao Y, et al. Aptamer-Modified Temperature-Sensitive Liposomal Contrast Agent for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:2618–23. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ling D, Park W, Park S-j, Lu Y, Kim KS, Hackett MJ, et al. Multifunctional Tumor pH-Sensitive Self-Assembled Nanoparticles for Bimodal Imaging and Treatment of Resistant Heterogeneous Tumors. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136:5647–55. doi: 10.1021/ja4108287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cao C-Y, Shen Y-Y, Wang J-D, Li L, Liang G-L. Controlled intracellular self-assembly of gadolinium nanoparticles as smart molecular MR contrast agents. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. 2013;3:1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep01024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santra S, Jativa SD, Kaittanis C, Normand G, Grimm J, Perez JM. Gadolinium-Encapsulating Iron Oxide Nanoprobe as Activatable NMR/MRI Contrast Agent. ACS Nano. 2012;6:7281–94. doi: 10.1021/nn302393e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tu C, Osborne EA, Louie AY. Activatable T1 and T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2011;39:1335–48. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0270-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang C-T, Chuang K-H. Gd(III) chelates for MRI contrast agents: from high relaxivity to “smart”, from blood pool to blood–brain barrier permeable. Medicinal Chemistry Communication. 2012;3:552–65. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Viger ML, Sankaranarayanan J, Lux CdG, Chan M, Almutairi A. Collective Activation of MRI Agents via Encapsulation and Disease-Triggered Release. Journal of the American Chemical Society Communications. 2013;135:7847–50. doi: 10.1021/ja403167p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Urbanczyk-Pearson LM, Femia FJ, Smith J, Parigi G, Duimstra JA, Eckermann AL, et al. Mechanistic Investigation of β-Galactosidase-Activated MR Contrast Agents. Inorganic Chemistry. 2008;47:56–68. doi: 10.1021/ic700888w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bonnet CS, Tóth É. Smart MR Imaging Agents Relevant to Potential Neurologic Applications. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2010;31:401–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tu C, Louie AY. Strategies for the development of Gd–based “q”–activatable MRI contrast agents. NMR in Biomedicine. 2013;26:781–7. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhu L, Yang Y, Farquhar K, Wang J, Tian C, Ranville J, et al. Surface Modification of Gd Nanoparticles with pH-Responsive Block Copolymers for Use As Smart MRI Contrast Agents. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8:5040–50. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Major JL, Parigi G, Luchinat C, Meade TJ. The synthesis and in vitro testing of a zinc-activated MRI contrast agent. PNAS. 2007;104:13881–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706247104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cha E-J, Jang ES, Sun I-C, Lee IJ, Ko JH, Kim YI, et al. Development of MRI/NIRF 'activatable' multimodal imaging probe based on iron oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011;155:152–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thorek DLJ, Chen AK, Czupryna J, Tsourkas A. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Probes for Molecular Imaging. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2006;34:23–38. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-9002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang Y-XJ, Hussain SM, Krestin GP. Superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents: physicochemical characteristics and applications in MR imaging. European Radiology. 2001;11:2319–31. doi: 10.1007/s003300100908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.LaConte LEW, Nitin N, Zurkiya O, Caruntu D, O'Connor CJ, Hu X, et al. Coating Thickness of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Affects R2 Relaxivity. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2007;26:1634–41. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huang J, Zhong X, Wang L, Yang L, Mao H. Improving the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast and Detection Methods with Engineered Magnetic Nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2012;2:86–102. doi: 10.7150/thno.4006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tong S, Hou S, Zheng Z, Zhou J, Bao G. Coating Optimization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for High T2 relaxivity. NANO LETTERS. 2010;10:4607–13. doi: 10.1021/nl102623x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duan H, Kuang M, Wang X, Wang YA, Mao H, Nie S. Reexamining the Effects of Particle Size and Surface Chemistry on the Magnetic Properties of Iron Oxide Nanocrystals: New Insights into Spin Disorder and Proton Relaxivity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Letters. 2008;112:8127–31. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Issa B, Qadri S, Obaidat IM, Bowtell RW, Haik Y. PEG Coating Reduces NMR Relaxivity of Mn0.5Zn0.5Gd0.02Fe1.98O4 Hyperthermia Nanoparticles. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011;34:1192–8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Heitzer T, Schlinzig T, Krohn K, Meinertz T, Münzel T. Endothelial Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2001;104:2673–8. doi: 10.1161/hc4601.099485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vasquez EC, Peotta VA, Gava AL, Pereira TM, Meyrelles SS. Cardiac and vascular phenotypes in the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2012;19:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-19-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reuter S, Gupta SC, Chaturvedi MM, Aggarwal BB. Oxidative stress, inflammation, and cancer: How are they linked? Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2010;49:1603–16. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Giugliano D, Ceriello A, Paolisso G. Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Which Role for Oxidative Stress? Metabolism. 1995;44:363–8. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kojda G, Harrison D. Interactions between NO and reactive oxygen species: pathophysiological importance in atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes and heart failure. Cardiovascular Research. 1999;43:562–71. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(99)00169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ohara Y, Peterson TE, Harrison DG. Hypercholesterolemia Increases Endothelial Superoxide Anion Production. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1993;91:2546–51. doi: 10.1172/JCI116491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kang DH. Oxidative Stress, DNA Damage, and Breast Cancer. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. 2002;13:540–9. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200211000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Visconti R, Grieco D. New insights on oxidative stress in cancer. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery & Development. 2009;12:240–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baynes JW, Thorpe SR. Role of Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Complications. Diabetes. 1999;48:1–9. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.MacNee W. Oxidative stress and lung inflammation in airways disease. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2001;429:195–207. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01320-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bowers R, Cool C, Murphy RC, Tuder RM, Hopken MW, Flores SC, et al. Oxidative Stress in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2004;169:764–9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200301-147OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kinnula VL, Fattman CL, Tan RJ, Oury TD. Oxidative Stress in Pulmonary Fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2005;172:417–22. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200501-017PP. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cheng HA, Drinnan CT, Pleshko N, Fisher OZ. Pseudotannins self-assembled into antioxidant complexes. Soft Matter. 2015;11:7783–91. doi: 10.1039/c5sm01224d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Larsen EKU, Nielsen T, Wittenborn T, Birkedal H, Vorup-Jensen T, Jakobsen MH, et al. Size-Dependent Accumulation of PEGylated Silane-Coated Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Murine Tumors. ACS Nano. 2009;3:1947–51. doi: 10.1021/nn900330m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mahmoudi M, Simchi A, Imani M, Häfeli UO. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Rigid Cross-linked Polyethylene Glycol Fumarate Coating for Application in Imaging and Drug Delivery. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113:8124–31. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alcantar NA, Aydil ES, Israelachvili JN. Polyethylene glycol–coated biocompatible surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B. 2000;51:343–51. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<343::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fisher OZ, Larson BL, Hill PS, Graupner D, Nguyen-Kim M-T, Kehr NS, et al. Melanin-like Hydrogels Derived from Gallic Macromers. Advanced Materials. 2012;24:3032–6. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Elst LV, et al. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chemical Reviews. 2008;108:2064–110. doi: 10.1021/cr068445e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Masoudi A, Hosseini HRM, Shokrgozar MA, Ahmadi R, Oghabian MA. The effect of poly(ethylene glycol) coating on colloidal stability of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as potential MRI contrast agent. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012;433:129–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.KC RB, Lee SM, Yoo ES, Choi JH, Ghim HD. Glycoconjugated chitosan stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles as a multifunctional nanoprobe. Materials Science and Engineering C. 2009;29:1668–73. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sun J, Zhou S, Hou P, Yang Y, Weng J, Li X, et al. Synthesis and characterization of biocompatible Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2006:333–41. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jokerst JV, Lobovkina T, Zare RN, Gambhir SS. Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2011;6:715–28. doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rasband WS. ImageJ. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: U.S. National Institute of Health; pp. 1997–2016. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fishbein KW. In: Susceptibility-Matched Multi-Well Sample Holders for High-Throughput Screening by Magnetic Analysis. Office USPaT., editor. USA: The Government of the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician Distribution of Noisy MRI Data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1995;34:910–4. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bloemen M, Brullot W, Luong TT, Geukens N, Gils A, Verbiest T. Improved functionalization of oleic acid-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Journal of Nanoparticles Research. 2012;14:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1100-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu F, Niu F, Peng N, Su Y, Yang Y. Synthesis, characterization, and application of Fe3O4@SiO2–NH2 nanoparticles. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2015;5:18128–36. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Weng X, Nguyen AV, Mei G, Yu Y. Biodegradable Quaternary Ammonium Salts for Processing Iron Ores. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2014;5:646–54. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kouchakzadeh H, Shojaosadati SA, Maghsoudi A, Farahani EV. Optimization of PEGylation Conditions for BSA Nanoparticles Using Response Surface Methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:1206–11. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9487-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen H, Paholak H, Ito M, Sansanaphongpricha K, Qian W, Che Y, et al. 'Living' PEGylation on gold nanoparticles to optimize cancer cell uptake by controlling targeting ligand and charge densities. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:355101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/35/355101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nag OK, Yadav VR, Hedrick A, Awasthi V. Post-modification of preformed liposomes with novel nonphospholipid poly(ethylene glycol)-conjugated hexadecylcarbamoylmethyl hexadecanoic acid for enhanced circulation persistence in vivo. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2013;446:119–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Boada J, Gallardo M, Alsina MaAn, Estelrich J. Adsorption of cyanuric chloride-activated polyethylene glycol on liposomes. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2001;182:191–8. [Google Scholar]






