ABSTRACT
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Kentucky (S. Kentucky) is frequently isolated from dairy cows in the United States, but is an infrequent cause of human salmonellosis. To investigate the genomic features of S. Kentucky strains isolated from a single dairy farm, the genomes of eight isolates were sequenced and added to the public domain.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Salmonella enterica is a major foodborne and livestock pathogen worldwide. There are over 2,500 recognized serovars of S. enterica, and some of these are more frequently associated with specific animal hosts than others (https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/reportspubs/salmonella-atlas/serotyping-importance.html). Several serovars, such as S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Kentucky (S. Kentucky), are polyphyletic within the Salmonella phylogeny (1) and are known to have multiple sequence type (ST) assignments, suggesting that different strains of the same serovar may have different ecologies. This, however, has yet to be fully investigated. S. Kentucky ST198 has received the most attention due to the epidemic status of multidrug-resistant strains among humans in Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia, with cases in North America and Europe primarily linked with travel to those regions (2–6). S. Kentucky ST152 is rarely isolated from humans but is frequently isolated from asymptomatic cattle and poultry across the United States (7–10).
To further investigate the ecology of S. Kentucky, the genomes of eight ST152 isolates collected from different cows at different time points on a single dairy farm in Pennsylvania were sequenced and added to the public database. Isolates were first screened using the PCR-based serogrouping scheme as described by Karns et al. (11) with subsequent serovar level identification done by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL; Ames, IA). Confirmed S. Kentucky isolates were then grown overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. DNA was extracted from overnight cultures using a Qiagen DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Paired-end libraries were constructed using a Nextera XT kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA), and these libraries were sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology (Illumina). Genomes were assembled using SPAdes v3.0 (12) into 124 to 365 contigs with an average coverage between 37× and 66× and N50 contig lengths ranging between 332,848 and 438,375 bp. The genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. There were between 4,703 and 4,889 genes identified in these genomes.
Acquired antibiotic resistance genes were not identified in any of the genomes using the ResFinder database with the threshold for percent identification (% ID) set at 95% and the minimum alignment length set at 100% (13). Homologues of Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI) 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 as well as the centisome 63 pathogenicity island (C63PI) were detected in all genomes using SPIFinder with default parameters (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org/). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) types identified in Enterobase were 1,097 (isolates CFSAN011775, CFSAN011776, CFSAN011779, and CFSAN011782) and 3,620 (isolates CFSAN011778, CFSAN011780, CFSAN011781, and CFSAN011777) (http://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/). In a whole-genome multilocus sequence type (wgMLST), all genomes were identified as different sequence types (STs) (ST-26854, ST-26850, ST-26844, ST-26846, ST-26843, ST-26848, ST-26842, and ST-21107), indicating that there is an appreciable level of diversity among S. Kentucky isolates from the same herd (http://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/).
Accession number(s).
This genome sequence project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers LOBM00000000, LOBK00000000, LOBJ00000000, LOBH00000000, LOBG00000000, LOBL00000000, LOBF00000000, and LOBI00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, LOBM01000000, LOBK01000000, LOBJ01000000, LOBH01000000, LOBG01000000, LOBL01000000, LOBF01000000, and LOBI01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was supported by internal FDA and USDA, ARS research funding.
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Footnotes
Citation Haley BJ, Luo Y, Wang C, Brown E, Allard M, Karns JS, Van Kessel JAS. 2017. Genome sequences of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Kentucky sequence type 152 isolated from dairy cows in the United States. Genome Announc 5:e01119-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01119-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Timme RE, Pettengill JB, Allard MW, Strain E, Barrangou R, Wehnes C, Van Kessel JS, Karns JS, Musser SM, Brown EW. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity of the enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica inferred from genome-wide reference-free SNP characters. Genome Biol Evol 5:2109–2123. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Le Hello S, Harrois D, Bouchrif B, Sontag L, Elhani D, Guibert V, Zerouali K, Weill FX. 2013. Highly drug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198-X1: a microbiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 13:672–679. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70124-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Le Hello S, Bekhit A, Granier SA, Barua H, Beutlich J, Zając M, Münch S, Sintchenko V, Bouchrif B, Fashae K, Pinsard JL, Sontag L, Fabre L, Garnier M, Guibert V, Howard P, Hendriksen RS, Christensen JP, Biswas PK, Cloeckaert A, Rabsch W, Wasyl D, Doublet B, Weill FX. 2013. The global establishment of a highly-fluoroquinolone resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198 strain. Front Microbiol 4:395. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Le Hello S, Hendriksen RS, Doublet B, Fisher I, Nielsen EM, Whichard JM, Bouchrif B, Fashae K, Granier SA, Jourdan-Da Silva N, Cloeckaert A, Threlfall EJ, Angulo FJ, Aarestrup FM, Wain J, Weill FX. 2011. International spread of an epidemic population of Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky ST198 resistant to ciprofloxacin. J Infect Dis 204:675–684. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mulvey MR, Boyd DA, Finley R, Fakharuddin K, Langner S, Allen V, Ang L, Bekal S, El Bailey S, Haldane D, Hoang L, Horsman G, Louis M, Robberts L, Wylie J. 2013. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky in Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 19:999–1001. doi: 10.3201/eid1906.121351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rickert-Hartman R, Folster JP. 2014. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Kentucky sequence type 198. Emerg Infect Dis 20:910–911. doi: 10.3201/eid2005.131575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wells SJ, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Dargatz DA, Ferris K, Green A. 2001. Fecal shedding of Salmonella spp. by dairy cows on farm and at cull cow markets. J Food Prot 64:3–11. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Edrington TS, Hume ME, Looper ML, Schultz CL, Fitzgerald AC, Callaway TR, Genovese KJ, Bischoff KM, McReynolds JL, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. 2004. Variation in the faecal shedding of Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 in lactating dairy cattle and examination of Salmonella genotypes using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:366–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01495.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Van Kessel JA, Karns JS, Wolfgang DR, Hovingh E. 2013. Regional distribution of two dairy-associated Salmonella enterica serotypes. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10:448–452. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haley BJ, Allard M, Brown E, Hovingh E, Karns JS, Van Kessel JS. 2015. Molecular detection of the index case of a subclinical Salmonella Kentucky epidemic on a dairy farm. Epidemiol Infect 143:682–686. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814001289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karns JS, Haley BJ, Van Kessel JA. 2015. Improvements to a PCR-based serogrouping scheme for Salmonella enterica from dairy farm samples. J Food Prot 78:1182–1185. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]