Abstract
In recent years, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have demonstrated marked progress in the field of oncology. General nanoparticles are widely used in tumor targeting, and the intrinsic magnetic property of MNPs makes them the most promising nanomaterial to be used as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and induced magnetic hyperthermia. The properties of MNPs are fully exploited when they are used as drug delivery agents, wherein drugs may be targeted to the desired specific location in vivo by application of an external magnetic field. Early diagnosis of cancer may be achieved by MRI, therefore, individualized treatment may be combined with MRI, so as to achieve the precise definition and appropriate treatment. In the present review, research on MNPs in cancer diagnosis, drug delivery and treatment has been summarized. Furthermore, the future perspectives and challenges of MNPs in the field of oncology are also discussed.
Keywords: cancer, magnetic nanoparticles, cancer diagnosis, drug delivery, treatment
1. Introduction
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are a kind of intelligent nanomagnetic material, with small particle size, large specific surface area, magnetic response and superparamagnetism (1). MNPs may be assembled and positioned under a constant magnetic field, and the heat is absorbed by the electromagnetic wave in the alternating magnetic field. In biomedical applications, MNPs are generally in the superparamagnetic state (2,3). The most frequently used nanomaterial is the iron oxide nanoparticle, including magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) (4). It is well known that MNPs have an important role in cancer diagnosis, drug delivery and treatment. For cancer diagnosis, tumor imaging technology opened the possibility of early detection of disease. Common imaging modalities include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (5), magneto acoustic tomography (MAT) (6), computed tomography (CT) (7) and near-infrared (NIR) imaging (8). Among them, MRI has a strong influence in the early diagnosis of cancer, and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are the most representative as a contrast agent for MRI (9). Currently, certain iron oxide-based MNPs have been approved for use in clinical MRI, for example ferumoxil (GastroMARK) enhances imaging of the bowel (10). Due to the small size and large specific surface area of MNPs, they are able to easily reach the location of the lesion (11). Therefore, MNPs as a drug carrier for drug delivery is an application that cannot be ignored. This property of MNPs is fully exploited when they are used as drug delivery agents, wherein drugs may be targeted to the desired specific location in vivo by application of an external magnetic field (12). In general, MNPs are used as drug carriers by binding antibodies (13) and chemotherapeutic drugs (14). Commonly, chemotherapeutic drugs are loaded in MNPs, and they are involved in cancer treatment. MNPs in the field of cancer therapy are generally used in several different ways: Chemotherapy; magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) (15); photodynamic therapy (PDT) (16); and photothermal therapy (PTT) (17). In order to achieve an improved therapeutic effect, the general method used is combination therapy. The present review provides a framework for the application of MNPs in medicine, such as cancer diagnosis, drug delivery and treatment. Furthermore, nanotoxicity is also reviewed, as well as the potential challenges and the opportunities.
2. Cancer diagnosis
When cancer is discovered earlier, the cure rate is greatly improved. Therefore, early detection and timely diagnosis of cancer is key to reduce the mortality rate of patients (18). Tumor imaging technology has an important role in cancer diagnosis and the choice of late clinical treatment options. Furthermore, MNPs are the contrast agents that are most widely researched and used in cancer imaging. Here, the imaging methods and the imaging positions of MNPs are discussed.
Imaging methods
MRI
Due to the high spatial resolution and tomographic capabilities of MRI, it has been considered to be one of the most valuable noninvasive imaging techniques (19), and MNPs have been recently proposed as a contrast agent for MRI (20). In general, in order to overcome the colloidal instability of MNPs, it is necessary to conduct surface modification of nanoparticles (NPs) by inducing the magnetic dipole interaction and its intrinsic surface energy (21). For example, water-dispersible polyethyleneimine (PEI)-coated Fe3O4 NPs were prepared, and then sequentially modified with PEGylated folic acid (FA) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FI) via PEI mediated conjugation chemistry (21). The remaining PEI surface amines were subjected to acetylation to form the colloidally stable FA-functionalized Fe3O4 NPs for MRI (21). In MRI, research has demonstrated that early lesion detection of a 6-year old boy with glioblastoma multiforme may be achieved by sensitive imaging of superparamagnetic NPs or aggregates (22). Furthermore, research on Au nanorod@polypyrrole@iron oxide (Au NR@PPy@FexO) nanocomposites has demonstrated that these systems exhibit a low r2/r1 ratio of 4.8, making them efficient T1 positive contrast-enhancing agents for MRI (19). The study also indicated that the multifunctional nanocomposites exhibited the potential of the combination of therapeutic and diagnostic features (23).
Other imaging methods
A study by Mariappan et al (6) presented magneto acoustic tomography, which uses magnetomotive force due to a short pulsed magnetic field to induce ultrasound in SPION-labeled tissue and estimates an image of the distribution of the NPs in vivo with ultrasound imaging resolution. Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) allows high spatial resolution and sensitivity as a tomographic imaging technology. A study by Lindemann et al (24) suggested that University of Luebeck Dextran-coated SPIONs are a promising tracer material for use in innovative tumor cell analysis in MPI. In addition, photoacoustic imaging has gained increasing attention as a potential imaging tool. A study by Li et al (25) developed a new generation of magnetomotive photoacoustic featuring cyclic magnetic motion and ultrasound speckle tracking, whose imaging capture frame rate is several hundred times faster than the photoacoustic speckle tracking method that has previously been demonstrated (26). Stone et al (8) demonstrated a magnetic NP system that may be used to observe the NP fate within a biofilm using NIR imaging. Additionally, Xi et al (27) presented a breast imaging technique combining high-resolution NIR light induced photoacoustic tomography (PAT) with NIR dye-labeled amino-terminal fragments of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-targeted magnetic iron oxide NPs (NIR830-ATF-IONP) for breast cancer imaging using a murine model of orthotopic mammary cancer. Other studies have demonstrated that ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging (28) and MPI (29) may improve the detection of MNPs in cancer.
For MNPs, in addition to MRI, other imaging methods are used in combination. This dual imaging method may improve the accuracy of diagnosis. For instance, dual imaging of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and MRI has been utilized in pancreatic (4) and breast (30) cancer. A study by Jang et al (31) demonstrated the synthesis and the use of monodisperse iron oxide NPs coated with fluorescent silica nano-shells for fluorescence and magnetic resonance dual imaging of tumors. Furthermore, Sun et al (32) utilized MRI and optical imaging (OI) for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Imaging position
Pancreas
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in the world due to its late presentation (33). Therefore, early diagnosis will increase the cure rate of patients. When chitosan-coated MNPs and survivin antisense oligonucleotides (ASON) are conjugated to give Sur-MNPs, the MNPs functionalized with ASON lead to targeted localization in pancreatic tumors (34). Survivin-targeted NPs could be used by MRI for detection of pancreatic tumors (34). Taking into account the more sensitive diagnostic tools to allow early medical imaging, biodegradable NPs prepared using recombinant human serum albumin and incorporated iron oxide (maghemite, γ-Fe2O3) NPs were developed (4). Improved targeting and imaging properties were demonstrated in mice using SPECT-CT and MRI (4).
Breast
A study by Bucci et al (35) outlined some guidelines for the design of the imaging device for MNPs to enhance the microwave imaging of breast cancer. The results demonstrated that MNP-enhanced microwave imaging may reliably detect cancer lesions even using low-complexity arrangements, when designed according to the devised guidelines. An investigation by Kato et al (36) concluded that liposome encapsulation significantly improved the delivery and retention of SPIONs in breast tumors, and targeted SPION liposomes have significantly improved accumulation in breast tumors, which could be the optimal option for MRI detection of breast tumors. With magnetic nanoclusters coated with ruthenium (II) complexes doped with silica (fluorescent magnetic NPs; FMNPs), Sun et al (32) demonstrated that more peptide cyclic-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-FMNPs accumulated around the tumors than FMNPs. The result indicated the potential application of RGD-FMNPs as a targeting molecular probe for detection of breast cancer using MRI and OI (32). In order to make more accurate and specific diagnosis of breast cancer, Bevacqua and Scapaticci (37) adopted a compressive sensing approach for three-dimensional breast cancer microwave imaging. In their paper, an ad hoc compressive sensing algorithm was developed by exploiting the knowledge of the maximum concentration of MNPs that may be targeted in human tissues (37).
Prostate
MRI provides the best soft tissue resolution and has an important role in the management of prostate cancer as it is the recommended imaging modality for patients with prostate cancer (38). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation in patients with prostate cancer is commonly performed via lymphoscintigraphy following injection of radiolabeled tracers (39). For example, patients underwent MRI at 1.5 T before and 1 day after SPION injection using T1-, T2- and T2*-weighted sequences (39). This was the first study to use intraprostatic injection of SPIONs to visualize SLNs by MRI in patients with prostate cancer (39). A study by Winter et al (40) indicated that using a transrectal intraprostatic injection of SPIONs for magnetic marking in prostate cancer is safe, feasible and reliably identifies SLNs and lymph node metastases in the majority of patients. In other cases, diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI is sensitive to water diffusion throughout tissues, which correlates with the Gleason score, a histological measure of prostate cancer aggressiveness (40). The incorporation of DW-MRI-based prostate cancer stratification and monitoring could increase the accuracy of preclinical trials using mice with transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (41).
Lung
To improve the sensitivity of detection of metastasis of lung cancer, Wan et al (42) created immune SPIONs used in magnetic resonance immune imaging. These SPIONs were coated with oleic acid and carboxymethyl dextran, and then conjugated to mouse anti-cluster of differentiation (CD) 44v6 monoclonal antibody (42). The prepared SPIONs are potentially useful for lung tumor-targeting diagnosis. In addition, targeted pulmonary inhalation aerosol-based delivery facilitates the direct application of drugs to the lungs in a controlled manner, and has inherent advantages (43). Therefore, Nishimoto et al (29) investigated the feasibility of applying MPI to pulmonary imaging using nebulized MNPs and to quantify the mucociliary clearance in the lung, using small animal experiments.
Other
Common contrast agents are frequently used in the pancreas, breast and prostate. In other cases, the diagnosis and treatment are carried out in combination, with a variety of imaging modalities, as outlined in Table I.
Table I.
Author, year | Imaging method | Treatment modality | Treatment site | (Refs.) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wang et al, 2014 | MRI | PDT | Head and neck | (44) |
Bhattacharya et al, 2016 | MRI | Targeted therapy | Head and neck | (45) |
Pilapong et al, 2014 | MRI | Targeted therapy | Liver | (46) |
Wu et al, 2015 | MRI | PTT | Liver/cervical | (47) |
Azhdarzadeh et al, 2016 | MRI | PTT | Colon | (48) |
Yu et al, 2015 | MRI/photoacoustic tomography | PTT | Liver/cervical | (49) |
Zhou et al, 2015 | MRI/photoacoustic imaging | Photothermal ablation | Breast | (50) |
Lin et al, 2015 | MRI/fluorescence imaging | Targeted therapy | Cervical | (51) |
Wang et al, 2014 | MRI/fluorescent imaging | Targeted therapy | Stomach | (13) |
Li et al, 2015 | MRI/infrared thermal imaging | Chemotherapy/MHT | Liver | (52) |
Kim et al, 2016 | MRI/optical imaging | PDT/MHT | Melanoma | (53) |
Sun et al, 2016 | MRI/computed tomography | Targeted therapy | Brain | (54) |
Zhao et al, 2014 | Near-infrared fluorescence imaging | PDT | Head and neck | (55) |
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PTT, photothermal therapy; MHT, magnetic hyperthermia.
3. Drug delivery
Magnetic targeted drug delivery has been used to improve the therapeutic performance of drugs and reduce the side effects associated with the conventional treatment of cancer. MNPs coated with a stabilizing shell have been successfully used as contrast agents for MRI (56). On the basis of early diagnosis, the treatment may be carried out at the same time, and the efficiency may be greatly improved. Therefore, MNPs are essential for drug delivery. By binding antibodies, chemotherapeutics or other drugs, MNPs may be used as drug carriers.
Antibodies
Research has demonstrated that antibody-conjugated MNPs may not only be used for detection of ovarian cancer biomarkers, but may also treat ovarian cancer due to their high-level accumulation within cancer cells (57,58). A study by Wang et al (13) reported, for the first time, that anti-α-subunit of adenosine triphosphate synthase antibody, HAI-178 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-conjugated fluorescent MNPs, was successfully used for targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of in vivo gastric cancer. As for human breast cancer, Shanehsazzadeh et al (59) demonstrated disappointing in vivo results that had very low accumulation of nanoprobes in the targeted site when conjugating ultra-small SPIONs with C595 mAb. On the contrary, a study by Rasaneh and Dadras (60) suggested that combining MNPs and a permanent magnet may increase the therapeutic efficacy of herceptin for increased accumulation in the tumor site.
In order to improve the therapeutic efficiency, the combination of antibodies and chemotherapeutic drugs is attracting increasing attention. A study by Aires et al (61) presented a novel multi-functionalized iron oxide MNP with anti-CD44 antibody and gemcitabine derivatives, and their application for the selective treatment of CD44-positive cancer cells. In addition, Huang et al (62) developed an ovarian cancer dual-targeting therapy involving magnetic Fe3O4 NPs grafted with single-chain antibody and docetaxel loaded β-cyclodextrin. These studies have demonstrated the great potential of the combination of antibodies and chemotherapeutic drugs.
Chemotherapeutic drugs
Commonly used chemotherapy drugs include doxorubicin (DOX), paclitaxel, cisplatin, gemcitabine, methotrexate, docetaxel, sorafenib and mitomycin C, as outlined in Table II. DOX is the most widely applied chemotherapy drug in targeted delivery systems (63). MNPs have limits in their stability because of hydrophobic coating (64). To address this issue, a reducible copolymer self-assembled with SPIONs was developed to deliver DOX for cancer therapy (14). The copolymer of reducible polyamidoamine with polyethylene glycol/dodecyl amine graft was synthesized by Michael addition (14). Additionally, research has demonstrated that the application of iron oxide MNPs improved DOX-NP cell penetration compared to free DOX and achieved a cellular response to DOX-NP conjugates similar to that of DOX alone (65). SPIONs have also been investigated as a carrier for targeted drug delivery. For example, Cicha et al (66) set up an in vitro system to analyze the different aspects of cellular responses to mitoxantrone-carrying SPIONs and to the drug released from SPIONs.
Table II.
Author, year | Drug | Polymer modification | Average size, nm | Cancer cell line | (Refs.) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zohreh et al, 2016 | Doxorubicin | Starch-g-poly (methylmethacrylate-co-PEG-acrylamide) | 93 | HeLa | (67) |
Frounchi and Shamshiri, 2015 | Poly (lactic acid)/PEG | 22 | – | (68) | |
Bhattacharya et al, 2016 | Polyethyleneimine cross-linked Pluronic F127 copolymer | ~91 | HeLa | (45) | |
Pilapong et al, 2014 | Carboxymethyl | 5 | K562/ADR | (69) | |
Wu et al, 2014 | APS-PEG-TFEE | 20 | MCF-7 | (70) | |
Chandra et al, 2015 | L6-PEG-PAMAM and S6-PEG-PAMAM | 9.6±0.13 | – | (71) | |
Hałupka-Bryl et al, 2015 | PEG-poly (4-chloromethylstyrene) | 8–12 | – | (72) | |
Zou et al, 2015 | Chitosan | ~120 | MCF-7 | (73) | |
Tansik et al, 2014 | PLGA | 74 | MCF-7 | (74) | |
Ghorbani et al, 2016 | Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-IA) | 30 | HeLa | (75) | |
Mangaiyarkarasi et al, 2016 | Paclitaxel | Chitosan | 19–37 | A549 | (76) |
Lin et al, 2015 | Poly[(N-isopropylacrylamide-r-acrylamide)-b-L-lactic acid] | 229.0±13.2 | HeLa | (77) | |
Fazilati, 2014 | Cisplatin | Heparin | 45±15 | CP70 | (78) |
Parsian et al, 2016 | Gemcitabine | Chitosan | 4 | SKBR; MCF-7 | (79) |
Roy et al, 2016 | Methotrexate | Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)-co-tyrosine | 10–15 | MCF-7 | (80) |
Nagesh et al, 2016 | Docetaxel | Cyclodextrin and F127 polymer | 139.5±2.16 | C4-2 | (81) |
Li et al, 2015 | Sorafenib | PEGylated PLGA | 205±3.12 | BEL7402 | (82) |
Türkmen et al, 2014 | Mitomycin C | Poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) | 200 | – | (83) |
Unsoy et al, 2014 | Bortezomib | Chitosan | 5–7 | HeLa; SiHa | (84) |
PEG, polyethylene glycol; APS-PEG-TFEE, Polyethylene glycol dicarboxylic acid; PLGA, Poly (DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid).
Other
In addition to chemotherapy drugs, some traditional Chinese medicine monomers have been utilized as anti-cancer drugs in targeted drug delivery. A study by Nigam and Bahadur (85) demonstrated the fabrication and characterization of dendrimerized MNPs as delivery vectors for epigallocatechin gallate. Recently, curcumin has been widely applied in the drug delivery of MNPs in breast and ovarian cancer. A study by Mancarella et al (86) developed a layer by layer functionalization of Fe3O4 NPs by coating them in Dextran and Poly(L-lysine), which obtained a high upload of curcumin in Fe3O4 NPs for treating ovarian cancer. Furthermore, magnetic Fe3O4@zirconium phosphate core-shell NPs and magnetic Fe3O4@hydroxyapatite-PEI-b-cyclodextrin NPs have been demonstrated to be effective drug carriers for the delivery of curcumin, and these were both used to treat breast cancer (87,88).
In other cases, oligonucleotides are applied in drug delivery. A study by Pourianazar and Gunduz (89) utilized three-layer MNPs composed of a Fe3O4 magnetic core, an aminosilane interlayer and a cationic poly(amidoamine) dendrimer, which enhanced the accumulation of CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides molecules in tumor cells as a novel targeted delivery system. Furthermore, 2-amino-2-deoxy-glucose was conjugated to -COOH-modified cobalt ferrite MNPs, which were designed to target tumor cells as a potential targetable drug/gene delivery agent for cancer treatment (90). In summary, MNPs may provide a high-efficiency drug delivery system with the potential to achieve drug targeting.
4. Cancer treatment
As a drug carrier, the ultimate goal of MNPs is to treat. This section discusses and provides examples of the use of MNPs in MHT, PDT, PTT and combined treatment.
MHT
MHT has attracted a lot of interest in recent years due to its potential use in medicine. MNPs are able to convert electromagnetic energy into heat (91). Therefore, the most popular application for MNPs is most likely the destruction of tumor cells by heating them to their apoptosis threshold (92). Magnetic field strength and frequency, NP size, NP concentration and solution viscosity are important parameters and may improve the efficiency of heat generation for effective cancer therapy while administering a low NP treatment dose (93). Although MNPs represent an area of active development for MHT, the in vivo anti-tumor effect under a low-frequency magnetic field using MNPs has not yet been demonstrated. A study by Cheng et al (94) demonstrated the successful use of spin-vortex, disk-shaped permalloy magnetic particles in a low-frequency, rotating magnetic field for the in vitro and in vivo destruction of glioma cells. In addition, the hysteresis loss is also important for MHT, as increasing the hysteresis loss is improving the heating efficiency (94). A study by Sasayama et al (95) examined the hysteresis loss of magnetically fractionated MNPs for hyperthermia application. They concluded that the efficiency of hyperthermia is improved by magnetically separating MNPs (95). Generally, MHT may enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs to some degree. For instance, by combining SPIONs (MF66) functionalized with Nucant multivalent pseudopeptide (N6L), DOX and MHT, the therapeutic effects of MHT in breast cancer could be strongly enhanced (96). Furthermore, dual-functional Pt-Fe-hydroxyapatite MNPs were developed for chemo-hyperthermia treatment of lung cancer (97). In addition, research has indicated that MHT of MNPs enhanced radiation therapy in murine models of human prostate cancer (98). In other cases, gene delivery also has an important role in MHT (99,100).
PDT
PDT is an externally-activated and minimally invasive modality for cancer treatment. The process of PDT involves the systemic or local application of photosensitizing drugs, called photosensitizers (PSs), followed by photoexcitation of the PSs in the tissue using light of the appropriate wavelength and power (16). In the presence of oxygen, the PS is excited from the ground state to the excited state following activation with light of an appropriate wavelength, and an electron is transferred to nearby tissue oxygen, producing oxygen free radicals or excited singlet oxygen (101). These substances are also known as reactive oxygen species (ROS) (102,103), which cause cell damage, and eventually lead to cancer tissue damage. To enhance the effect of PSs, building a targeted drug delivery system with MNPs has become of interest. For instance, a study by Park et al (104) synthesized multifunctional cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) NPs [CoFe2O4-hematoporphyrins (HPs)-FAs] functionalized by coating them with HP for introducing photo-functionality and by conjugating with FA for targeting cancer cells. Furthermore, other research has revealed that the Fe3O4@HP particles demonstrated remarkable and efficient photodynamic anticancer activity, and exhibited strong anticancer effects on human prostate cancer (PC-3) and breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cell lines (105). Pyropheophorbide-a (PPA) as a novel chlorin PS was prepared for PDT. PPA-coated multifunctional magneto-fluorescent NPs, Fe3O4@SiO2@CS@PPA (MFCSPPA) were designed (106). The experiments demonstrated that MFCSPPA had strong photodynamic therapy activity and low dark toxicity, and cell viability of human HeLa cervical cancer cells was reduced to 18% following treatment with PDT (106).
PTT
As a light absorbent of low toxicity on skin and deep tissue penetration, NIR may directly kill cancer cells by PTT, which has become a controlled treatment method (107). PTT using photothermal agents in combination with NIR has also gained increasing attention for cancer treatment (108). An example of this is engineering phosphopeptide-decorated MNPs as efficient photothermal agents for solid tumor therapy (109). Notably, the photothermal effect of MNP clusters was initially reported for the photothermal ablation (PTA) of tumors in vitro and in vivo. Compared with individual magnetic Fe3O4 NPs, clustered Fe3O4 NPs may result in a marked increase in NIR absorption (17). Upon NIR irradiation at 808 nm, clustered Fe3O4 NPs inducing higher temperatures were more cytotoxic against A549 cells (17). In the majority of cases, PTT and MRI are carried out in combination (110,111). However, a study indicated that, compared with their large counterparts, small Fe3O4 NPs exhibited greater cellular internalization, thus enabling a higher PTA efficacy in vitro (112). In addition, 120 nm may be the optimal diameter of Fe3O4 NPs for MRI and PAT in vitro (112). Therefore, the size of MNPs may be an important factor for PTT.
Combined treatment
In general, MNPs act as drug carriers for targeted delivery systems. The nanocomplex with PTT agents and PSs together may be used for combined cancer PTT and PDT. A study by Bhana et al (113) demonstrated the first application of magnetic-optical hybrid nanosystems for magnetic-field-guided drug delivery and dual mode PTT and PDT. The composite NPs may generate heat and ROS simultaneously upon NIR laser irradiation, and may even be selectively delivered to the mitochondria (114). Furthermore, MNPs have been demonstrated to have the dual capacity to act as both magnetic and PTT agents for amplification of heating efficiency (115). In conclusion, these results demonstrated high accumulation of MNPs in tumors and excellent tumor regression.
5. Conclusions and perspectives
MNPs as contrast agents of imaging have a great potential in adjuvant therapy. However, due to some toxicity being associated with the use of MNPs, many restrictions have been applied in their application. Surface coatings of MNPs are known to influence advantageous features of MNPs, as well as potential toxicity. Research has indicated that the larger the size of the MNPs, the greater the accumulation in vivo. Therefore, controlling the size and surface coatings of MNPs could reduce toxicity and improve magnetic behaviors.
In the present review, we focused on cancer diagnosis by imaging, drug delivery and treatment using MNPs. Despite many successful studies using MNPs as a theranostic material, there are still some challenges. While many MNP formulations have demonstrated excellent results in small animal models, they cannot reach the clinical requirement. By focusing on improving their drug loading capacity, and increasing their specificity and affinity to target cancer cells, MNPs may become suitable for clinical use with integrated imaging and multimodal therapy in the near future and dramatically impact the treatment of cancer.
Acknowledgements
The present review was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81473361).
References
- 1.Yarar E, Karakas G, Rende D, Ozisik R, Malta S. Influence of surface coating of magnetic nanoparticles on mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Journal. 2016 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Briguet A, Jeandey C, Tournier E. System of coils for producing additional fields for obtaining polarization fields with constant gradients in a magnet having polarization pole pieces for image production by nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal. 1988 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dan M, Bae Y, Pittman TA, Yokel RA. Alternating magnetic field-induced hyperthermia increases iron oxide nanoparticle cell association/uptake and flux in blood-brain barrier models. Pharm Res. 2015;32:1615–1625. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1561-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosenberger I, Strauss A, Dobiasch S, Weis C, Szanyi S, Gil-Iceta L, Alonso E, Esparza González M, Gómez-Vallejo V, Szczupak B, et al. Targeted diagnostic magnetic nanoparticles for medical imaging of pancreatic cancer. J Control Release. 2015;214:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lu AH, Zhang XQ, Sun Q, Zhang Y, Song Q, Schüth F, Chen C, Cheng F. Precise synthesis of discrete and dispersible carbon-protected magnetic nanoparticles for efficient magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy. Nano Res. 2016;9:1460–1469. doi: 10.1007/s12274-016-1042-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mariappan L, Shao Q, Jiang C, Yu K, Ashkenazi S, Bischof JC, He B. Magneto acoustic tomography with short pulsed magnetic field for in-vivo imaging of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2016;12:689–699. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.FitzGerald PF, Butts MD, Roberts JC, Colborn RE, Torres AS, Lee BD, Yeh BM, Bonitatibus PJ., Jr A proposed computed tomography contrast agent using carboxybetaine zwitterionic tantalum oxide nanoparticles: Imaging, biological and physicochemical performance. Invest Radiol. 2016;51:786–796. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stone RC, Fellows BD, Qi B, Trebatoski D, Jenkins B, Raval Y, Tzeng TR, Bruce TF, McNealy T, Austin MJ, et al. Highly stable multi-anchored magnetic nanoparticles for optical imaging within biofilms. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;459:175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhou Q, Wei Y. For better or worse, iron overload by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as a MRI contrast agent for chronic liver diseases. Chem Res Toxicol. 2017;30:73–80. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tse BW, Cowin GJ, Soekmadji C, Jovanovic L, Vasireddy RS, Ling MT, Khatri A, Liu T, Thierry B, Russell PJ. PSMA-targeting iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles enhance MRI of preclinical prostate cancer. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2015;10:375–386. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ahmed M, Douek M. The role of magnetic nanoparticles in the localization and treatment of breast cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:281230. doi: 10.1155/2013/281230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Singh A, Dilnawaz F, Mewar S, Sharma U, Jagannathan N, Sahoo SK. Retraction notice for composite polymeric magnetic nanoparticles for codelivery of hydrophobic and hydrophilic anticancer drugs and MRI imaging for cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interf. 2014;6:4595. doi: 10.1021/am500410q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang C, Bao C, Liang S, Zhang L, Fu H, Wang Y, Wang K, Li C, Deng M, Liao Q, et al. HAI-178 antibody-conjugated fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and simultaneous therapy of gastric cancer. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9:274. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen J, Shi M, Liu P, Ko A, Zhong W, Liao W, Xing MM. Reducible polyamidoamine-magnetic iron oxide self-assembled nanoparticles for doxorubicin delivery. Biomaterials. 2014;35:1240–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yin PT, Shah BP, Lee KB. Combined magnetic nanoparticle-based microRNA and hyperthermia therapy to enhance apoptosis in brain cancer cells. Small. 2014;10:4106–4112. doi: 10.1002/smll.201400963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li L, Nurunnabi M, Nafiujjaman M, Jeong YY, Lee Yk, Huh KM. A photosensitizer-conjugated magnetic iron oxide/gold hybrid nanoparticle as an activatable platform for photodynamic cancer therapy. J Mat Chem B. 2014;2:2929–2937. doi: 10.1039/c4tb00181h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shen S, Wang S, Zheng R, Zhu X, Jiang X, Fu D, Yang W. Magnetic nanoparticle clusters for photothermal therapy with near-infrared irradiation. Biomaterials. 2015;39:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang H, Li J, Hu Y, Shen M, Shi X, Zhang G. Folic acid-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of human ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2016;9:19. doi: 10.1186/s13048-016-0230-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luo Y, Yang J, Yan Y, Li J, Shen M, Zhang G, Mignani S, Shi X. RGD-functionalized ultrasmall iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted T1-weighted MR imaging of gliomas. Nanoscale. 2015;7:14538–14546. doi: 10.1039/C5NR04003E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yadollahpour A, Hosseini SA, Rashidi S, Farhadi F. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles as contrast agents in MRI: Recent advances and clinical challenges. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2016 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li J, Hu Y, Yang J, Sun W, Cai H, Wei P, Sun Y, Zhang G, Shi X, Shen M. Facile synthesis of folic acid-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles with ultrahigh relaxivity for targeted tumor MR imaging. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:5720–5730. doi: 10.1039/C5TB00849B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li Z, Hsu CH, Dimitrov N, Hwang DW, Chang HW, Hwang LP, Lin YY. Sensitive imaging of magnetic nanoparticles for cancer detection by active feedback MR. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Apr 4; doi: 10.1002/mrm.25832. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yang Z, Ding X, Jiang J. Facile synthesis of magnetic-plasmonic nanocomposites as T1 MRI contrast enhancing and photothermal therapeutic agents. Nano Res. 2016;9:787–799. doi: 10.1007/s12274-015-0958-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lindemann A, Lüdtke-Buzug K, Fräderich BM, Gräfe K, Pries R, Wollenberg B. Biological impact of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging of head and neck cancer cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:5025–5040. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S63873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li J, Arnal B, Wei CW, Shang J, Nguyen TM, O'Donnell M, Gao X. Magneto-optical nanoparticles for cyclic magnetomotive photoacoustic imaging. ACS Nano. 2015;9:1964–1976. doi: 10.1021/nn5069258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jaeger M, Preisser S, Kitz M, Ferrara D, Senegas S, Schweizer D, Frenz M. Improved contrast deep optoacoustic imaging using displacement-compensated averaging: Breast tumour phantom studies. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5889–5901. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/18/008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xi L, Grobmyer SR, Zhou G, Qian W, Yang L, Jiang H. Molecular photoacoustic tomography of breast cancer using receptor targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents. J Biophotonics. 2014;7:401–409. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201200155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang L, Zhong X, Qian W, Huang J, Cao Z, Yu Q, Lipowska M, Lin R, Wang A, Yang L, Mao H. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of receptor targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in mouse tumor models. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:1071–1081. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nishimoto K, Mimura A, Aoki M, Banura N, Murase K. Application of magnetic particle imaging to pulmonary imaging using nebulized magnetic nanoparticles. Open J Med Imag. 2015;5:49. doi: 10.4236/ojmi.2015.52008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deng S, Zhang W, Zhang B, Hong R, Chen Q, Dong J, Chen Y, Chen Z, Wu Y. Radiolabeled cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic (RGD)-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dual-modality agents for imaging of breast cancer. J Nano Res. 2015;17:19. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2845-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jang H, Lee C, Nam GE, Quan B, Choi HJ, Yoo JS, Piao Y. In vivo magnetic resonance and fluorescence dual imaging of tumor sites by using dye-doped silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. J Nano Res. 2016;18:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11051-016-3353-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sun J, Teng ZG, Tian Y, Wang JD, Guo Y, Kim DH, Larson AC, Lu GM. Targeted fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for imaging of human breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:4747–4758. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Karelia D, Pandey MK, Irby R, Amin S, Sharma AK. Abstract 3439: Suppression of pancreatic cancer cell growth by NISC-6 through activation of Par-4 and death receptor 5. Exp Mol Ther. 2013;73 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang Z, Tong M, Chen X, Hu S, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Wu Y, Li X, Li D. Survivin-targeted nanoparticles for pancreatic tumor imaging in mouse model. Nanomedicine. 2016;12:1651–1661. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bucci OM, Crocco L, Scapaticci R. On the optimal measurement configuration for magnetic nanoparticles-enhanced breast cancer microwave imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:407–414. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2355411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kato Y, Zhu W, Backer MV, Neoh CC, Hapuarachchige S, Sarkar SK, Backer JM, Artemov D. Noninvasive imaging of liposomal delivery of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to orthotopic human breast tumor in mice. Pharm Res. 2015;32:3746–3755. doi: 10.1007/s11095-015-1736-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bevacqua MT, Scapaticci R. A Compressive sensing approach for 3D breast cancer microwave imaging with magnetic nanoparticles as contrast agent. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35:665–673. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2490340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guneyli S, Erdem CZ, Erdem LO. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Clin Imaging. 2016;40:601–609. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Winter A, Kowald T, Paulo T, Goos P, Engels S, Gerullis H, Chavan A, Wawroschek F. 1060 Magnetic resonance sentinel lymph node imaging in prostate cancer using intraprostatic injection of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: The first in-human results. Europ Urol Suppl. 2016;15:e1060. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(16)61061-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Winter A, Woenkhaus J, Wawroschek F. 979 Magnetic marking and intraoperative detection of primary draining lymph nodes in prostate cancer using intraprostatic injection of superparamagnetic iron oxid nanoparticles. Europ Urol Suppl. 2015;14:e979. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(15)60967-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hill DK, Kim E, Teruel JR, Jamin Y, Widerøe M, Søgaard CD, Størkersen Ø, Rodrigues DN, Heindl A, Yuan Y, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for early detection and characterization of prostate cancer in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate model. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43:1207–1217. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wan X, Song Y, Song N, Li J, Yang L, Li Y, Tan H. The preliminary study of immune superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for the detection of lung cancer in magnetic resonance imaging. Carbohydr Res. 2016;419:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stocke NA, Meenach SA, Arnold SM, Mansour HM, Hilt JZ. Formulation and characterization of inhalable magnetic nanocomposite microparticles (MnMs) for targeted pulmonary delivery via spray drying. Int J Pharm. 2015;479:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang D, Fei B, Halig LV, Qin X, Hu Z, Xu H, Wang YA, Chen Z, Kim S, Shin DM, Chen ZG. Targeted iron-oxide nanoparticle for photodynamic therapy and imaging of head and neck cancer. ACS Nano. 2014;8:6620–6632. doi: 10.1021/nn501652j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bhattacharya D, Behera B, Sahu SK, Ananthakrishnan R, Maiti TK, Pramanik P. Design of dual stimuli responsive polymer modified magnetic nanoparticles for targeted anti-cancer drug delivery and enhanced MR imaging. New J Chem. 2016;40:545–557. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ02504D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pilapong C, Sitthichai S, Thongtem S, Thongtem T. Smart magnetic nanoparticle-aptamer probe for targeted imaging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Pharm. 2014;473:469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wu M, Zhang D, Zeng Y, Wu L, Liu X, Liu J. Nanocluster of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with poly (dopamine) for magnetic field-targeting, highly sensitive MRI and photothermal cancer therapy. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:115102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/11/115102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Azhdarzadeh M, Atyabi F, Saei AA, Varnamkhasti BS, Omidi Y, Fateh M, Ghavami M, Shanehsazzadeh S, Dinarvand R. Theranostic MUC-1 aptamer targeted gold coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy of colon cancer. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;143:224–232. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yu J, Yin W, Zheng X, Tian G, Zhang X, Bao T, Dong X, Wang Z, Gu Z, Ma X, Zhao Y. Smart MoS2/Fe3O4 nanotheranostic for magnetically targeted photothermal therapy guided by magnetic resonance/photoacoustic imaging. Theranostics. 2015;5:931–935. doi: 10.7150/thno.11802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhou M, Singhana B, Liu Y, Huang Q, Mitcham T, Wallace MJ, Stafford RJ, Bouchard RR, Melancon MP. Photoacoustic- and magnetic resonance-guided photothermal therapy and tumor vasculature visualization using theranostic magnetic gold nanoshells. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11:1442–1450. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2015.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lin J, Li Y, Li Y, Wu H, Yu F, Zhou S, Xie L, Luo F, Lin C, Hou Z. Drug/dye-loaded, multifunctional PEG-chitosan-iron oxide nanocomposites for methotraxate synergistically self-targeted cancer therapy and dual model imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:11908–11920. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b01685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li J, Hu Y, Hou Y, Shen X, Xu G, Dai L, Zhou J, Liu Y, Cai K. Phase-change material filled hollow magnetic nanoparticles for cancer therapy and dual modal bioimaging. Nanoscale. 2015;7:9004–9012. doi: 10.1039/C5NR01744K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim KS, Kim J, Lee JY, Matsuda S, Hideshima S, Mori Y, Osaka T, Na K. Correction: Stimuli-responsive magnetic nanoparticles for tumor-targeted bimodal imaging and photodynamic/hyperthermia combination therapy. Nanoscale. 2016;8:12843. doi: 10.1039/C6NR90122K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sun L, Joh DY, Al-Zaki A, Stangl M, Murty S, Davis JJ, Baumann BC, Alonso-Basanta M, Kaol GD, Tsourkas A, Dorsey JF. Theranostic application of mixed gold and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle micelles in glioblastoma multiforme. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016;12:347–356. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2016.2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhao X, Chen Z, Zhao H, Zhang D, Tao L, Lan M. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles for simultaneous cancer near-infrared imaging and targeting photodynamic therapy. RSC Adv. 2014;4:62153–62159. doi: 10.1039/C4RA10801A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Khalkhali M, Rostamizadeh K, Sadighian S, Khoeini F, Naghibi M, Hamidi M. The impact of polymer coatings on magnetite nanoparticles performance as MRI contrast agents: A comparative study. Daru. 2015;23:45. doi: 10.1186/s40199-015-0124-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pal MK, Rashid M, Bisht M. Multiplexed magnetic nanoparticle-antibody conjugates (MNPs-ABS) based prognostic detection of ovarian cancer biomarkers, CA-125, β-2M and ApoA1 using fluorescence spectroscopy with comparison of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;73:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.05.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ndong C, Toraya-Brown S, Kekalo K, Baker I, Gerngross TU, Fiering SN, Griswold KE. Antibody-mediated targeting of iron oxide nanoparticles to the folate receptor alpha increases tumor cell association in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:2595–2617. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S79367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shanehsazzadeh S, Gruettner C, Lahooti A, Mahmoudi M, Allen BJ, Ghavami M, Daha FJ, Oghabian MA. Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo. Contrast Media Mol Imag. 2014;10:225–236. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rasaneh S, Dadras MR. The possibility of using magnetic nanoparticles to increase the therapeutic efficiency of Herceptin antibody. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2015;60:485–490. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Aires A, Ocampo SM, Simões BM, Rodríguez Josefa M, Cadenas JF, Couleaud P, Spence K, Latorre A, Miranda R, Somoza Á, et al. Multifunctionalized iron oxide nanoparticles for selective drug delivery to CD44-positive cancer cells. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:065103. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/6/065103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Huang X, Yi C, Fan Y, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Liang Z, Pan J. Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles grafted with single-chain antibody (scFv) and docetaxel loaded β-cyclodextrin potential for ovarian cancer dual-targeting therapy. Mat Sci Eng. C. 2014;42:325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jia Y, Yuan M, Yuan H, Huang X, Sui X, Cui X, Tang F, Peng J, Chen J, Lu S, et al. Co-encapsulation of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and doxorubicin into biodegradable PLGA nanocarriers for intratumoral drug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1697–1708. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S28629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Singh M, Ulbrich P, Prokopec V, Svoboda P, Šantavá E, Štěpánek F. Effect of hydrophobic coating on the magnetic anisotropy and radiofrequency heating of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. J Magnet Magn Mat. 2013;339:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.02.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Augustin E, Czubek B, Nowicka AM, Kowalczyk A, Stojek Z, Mazerska Z. Improved cytotoxicity and preserved level of cell death induced in colon cancer cells by doxorubicin after its conjugation with iron-oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016;33:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cicha I, Scheffler L, Ebenau A, Lyer S, Alexiou C, Goppelt-Struebe M. Mitoxantrone-loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as drug carriers for cancer therapy: Uptake and toxicity in primary human tubular epithelial cells. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10:557–566. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1095364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zohreh N, Hosseini SH, Pourjavadi A. Hydrazine-modified starch coated magnetic nanoparticles as an effective pH-responsive nanocarrier for doxorubicin delivery. J Indus Eng Chem. 2016;39:203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Frounchi M, Shamshiri S. Magnetic nanoparticles-loaded PLA/PEG microspheres as drug carriers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103:1893–1898. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pilapong C, Keereeta Y, Munkhetkorn S, Thongtem S, Thongtem T. Enhanced doxorubicin delivery and cytotoxicity in multidrug resistant cancer cells using multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B: Bio. 2014;113:249–253. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wu J, Wang Y, Jiang W, Xu S, Tian R. Synthesis and characterization of recyclable clusters of magnetic nanoparticles as doxorubicin carriers for cancer therapy. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;321:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chandra S, Noronha G, Dietrich S, Lang H, Bahadur D. Dendrimer-magnetic nanoparticles as multiple stimuli responsive and enzymatic drug delivery vehicle. J Magn Magn Mat. 2015;380:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hałupka-Bryl M, Bednarowicz M, Dobosz B, Krzyminiewski R, Zomasz T, Wereszczyńska B, Nowaczyk G, Jarek M, Nagasaki Y. Doxorubicin loaded PEG-b-poly(4-vinylbenzylphosphonate) coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. J Magn Magn Mat. 2015;384:320–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.02.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zou Y, Liu P, Liu CH, Zhi XT. Doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous magnetic nanoparticles to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biomed Pharm. 2015;69:355–360. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tansık G, Yakar A, Gündüz U. Tailoring magnetic PLGA nanoparticles suitable for doxorubicin delivery. J Nano Res. 2014;16:2171. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-2171-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ghorbani M, Hamishehkar H, Arsalani N, Entezami AA. Surface decoration of magnetic nanoparticles with folate-conjugated poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-itaconic acid): A facial synthesis of dual-responsive nanocarrier for targeted delivery of doxorubicin. Int J Poly Mat Poly Bio. 2016;65:683–694. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2016.1157800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mangaiyarkarasi R, Chinnathambi S, Karthikeyan S, Aruna P, Ganesan S. Paclitaxel conjugated Fe3O4@LaF3:Ce3+,Tb3+ nanoparticles as bifunctional targeting carriers for Cancer theranostics application. J Magn Magn Mat. 2016;399:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.09.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lin MM, Kang YJ, Sohn Y, Kim DK. Dual targeting strategy of magnetic nanoparticle-loaded and RGD peptide-activated stimuli-sensitive polymeric micelles for delivery of paclitaxel. J Nano Res. 2015;17:248. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-3033-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fazilati M. Anti-neoplastic applications of heparin coated magnetic nanoparticles against human ovarian cancer. J Inorg Organ Poly Mat. 2014;24:551–559. doi: 10.1007/s10904-013-0005-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Parsian M, Unsoy G, Mutlu P, Yalcin S, Tezcaner A, Gunduz U. Loading of gemcitabine on chitosan magnetic nanoparticles increases the anti-cancer efficacy of the drug. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;784:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Roy E, Patra S, Madhuri R, Sharma PK. Stimuli-responsive poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide)-co-tyrosine@ gadolinium: Iron oxide nanoparticle-based nanotheranostic for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Coll Surf B: Bio. 2016;142:248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nagesh PK, Johnson NR, Boya VK, Chowdhury P, Othman SF, Khalilzad-Sharghi V, Hafeez BB, Ganju A, Khan S, Behrman SW, et al. PSMA targeted docetaxel-loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for prostate cancer. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;144:8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Li YJ, Dong M, Kong FM, Zhou JP. Folate-decorated anticancer drug and magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated polymeric carrier for liver cancer therapeutics. Int J Pharm. 2015;489:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Türkmen D, Bereli N, Çorman ME, Shaikh H, Akgöl S, Denizli A. Molecular imprinted magnetic nanoparticles for controlled delivery of mitomycin C. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2014;42:316–322. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2013.823094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Unsoy G, Yalcin S, Khodadust R, Mutlu P, Onguru O, Gunduz U. Chitosan magnetic nanoparticles for pH responsive Bortezomib release in cancer therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2014;68:641–648. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nigam S, Bahadur D. Dendrimerized magnetic nanoparticles as carriers for the anticancer compound, epigallocatechin gallate. IEEE Transact on Magn. 2016;52:1–5. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2517602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mancarella S, Greco V, Baldassarre F, Vergara D, Maffia M, Leporatti S. Polymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles for curcumin delivery to cancer cells. Macromol Biosci. 2015;15:1365–1374. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201500142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kalita H, Rajput S, Kumar BP, Mandal M, Pathak A. Fe3O4@zirconium phosphate core-shell nanoparticles for pH-sensitive and magnetically guided drug delivery applications. RSC Adv. 2016;6:21285–21292. doi: 10.1039/C5RA27215G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Akrami M, Khoobi M, Khalilvand-Sedagheh M, Haririan I, Bahador A, Faramarzi MA, Rezaei S, Javar HA, Salehi F, Ardestani SK, Shafiee A. Evaluation of multilayer coated magnetic nanoparticles as biocompatible curcumin delivery platforms for breast cancer treatment. RSC Adv. 2015;5:88096–88107. doi: 10.1039/C5RA13838H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Pourianazar NT, Gunduz U. CpG oligodeoxynucleotide-loaded PAMAM dendrimer-coated magnetic nanoparticles promote apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biomed Pharm. 2016;78:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Aşık E, Aslan TN, Volkan M, Güray NT. 2-Amino-2-deoxy-glucose conjugated cobalt ferrite magnetic nanoparticle (2DG-MNP) as a targeting agent for breast cancer cells. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016;41:272–278. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lee JH, Jang JT, Choi JS, Moon SH, Noh SH, Kim JW, Kim JG, Kim IS, Park KI, Cheon J. Exchange-coupled magnetic nanoparticles for efficient heat induction. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:418–422. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Guibert C, Dupuis V, Peyre V, Fresnais J. Hyperthermia of magnetic nanoparticles: Experimental study of the role of aggregation. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:28148–28154. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Shah RR, Davis TP, Glover AL, Nikles DE, Brazel CS. Impact of magnetic field parameters and iron oxide nanoparticle properties on heat generation for use in magnetic hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015;387:96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cheng Y, Muroski ME, Petit DCMC, Mansell R, Vemulkar T, Morshed RA, Han Y, Balyasnikova IV, Horbinski CM, Huang X, et al. Rotating magnetic field induced oscillation of magnetic particles for in vivo mechanical destruction of malignant glioma. J Control Release. 2016;223:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Sasayama T, Yoshida T, Tanabe K, Tsujimura N, Enpuku K. Hysteresis loss of fractionated magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia application. IEEE Trans Magn. 2015;51:1–4. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2438858. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kossatz S, Grandke J, Couleaud P, Latorre A, Aires A, Crosbie-Staunton K, Ludwig R, Dähring H, Ettelt V, Lazaro-Carrillo A, et al. Efficient treatment of breast cancer xenografts with multifunctionalized iron oxide nanoparticles combining magnetic hyperthermia and anti-cancer drug delivery. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:66. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0576-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tseng CL, Chang KC, Yeh MC, Yang KC, Tang TP, Lin FH. Development of a dual-functional Pt-Fe-HAP magnetic nanoparticles application for chemo-hyperthermia treatment of cancer. Ceram Int. 2014;40:5117–5127. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.09.137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Attaluri A, Kandala SK, Wabler M, Zhou H, Cornejo C, Armour M, Hedayati M, Zhang Y, DeWeese TL, Herman C, Ivkov R. Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia enhances radiation therapy: A study in mouse models of human prostate cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31:359–374. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1005178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yin PT, Shah S, Pasquale NJ, Garbuzenko OB, Minko T, Lee KB. Stem cell-based gene therapy activated using magnetic hyperthermia to enhance the treatment of cancer. Biomaterials. 2016;81:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Yuan C, An Y, Zhang J, Li H, Zhang H, Wang L, Zhang D. Magnetic nanoparticles for targeted therapeutic gene delivery and magnetic-inducing heating on hepatoma. Nanotechnology. 2014;25:345101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/34/345101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cheng J, Tan G, Li W, Li J, Wang Z, Jin Y. Preparation, characterization and in vitro photodynamic therapy of a pyropheophorbide-a-conjugated Fe3O4 multifunctional magnetofluorescence photosensitizer. RSC Adv. 2016;6:37610–37620. doi: 10.1039/C6RA03128E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Hou W, Xia F, Alves CS, Qian X, Yang Y, Cui D. MMP2-targeting and redox-responsive PEGylated chlorin e6 nanoparticles for cancer near-infrared imaging and photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mat Interfaces. 2016;8:1447–1457. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b10772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Li H, Song S, Wang W, Chen K. In vitro photodynamic therapy based on magnetic-luminescent Gd2O3:Yb, Er nanoparticles with bright three-photon up-conversion fluorescence under near-infrared light. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:16081–16090. doi: 10.1039/C5DT01015B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Park BJ, Choi KH, Nam KC, Ali A, Min JE, Son H, Uhm HS, Kim HJ, Jung JS, Choi EH. Photodynamic anticancer activities of multifunctional cobalt ferrite nanoparticles in various cancer cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11:226–235. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2015.2031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Nam KC, Choi KH, Lee KD, Kim JH, Jung JS, Park BJ. Particle size dependent photodynamic anticancer activity of hematoporphyrin-conjugated Fe3O4 particles. J Nanomaterial. 2016;2016:1. doi: 10.1155/2016/3613928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Cheng J, Tan G, Li W, Zhang H, Wu X, Wang Z, Jin Y. Facile synthesis of chitosan assisted multifunctional magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2@CS@pyropheophorbide-a fluorescent nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy. New J Chem. 2016;40:8522–8534. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ01765G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Cheng L, Yang K, Chen Q, Liu Z. Organic stealth nanoparticles for highly effective in vivo near-infrared photothermal therapy of cancer. ACS Nano. 2012;6:5605–5613. doi: 10.1021/nn301539m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Liang X, Li Y, Li X, Jing L, Deng Z, Yue X, Li C, Dai Z. PEGylated polypyrrole nanoparticles conjugating gadolinium chelates for dual-modal MRI/Photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy of cancer. Adv Func Mat. 2015;25:1451–1462. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201402338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wu M, Guo Q, Xu F, Liu S, Lu X, Wang J, Gao H, Luo P. Engineering phosphopeptide-decorated magnetic nanoparticles as efficient photothermal agents for solid tumor therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;476:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Yu J, Ju Y, Zhao L, Chu X, Yang W, Tian Y, Sheng F, Lin J, Liu F, Dong Y, Hou Y. Multistimuli-regulated photochemothermal cancer therapy remotely controlled via Fe5C2 nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2016;10:159–169. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhang M, Cao Y, Wang L, Ma Y, Tu X, Zhang Z. Manganese doped iron oxide theranostic nanoparticles for combined T1 magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Mat Interfaces. 2015;7:4650–4658. doi: 10.1021/am5080453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Guo X, Wu Z, Li W, Wang Z, Li Q, Kong F, Zhang H, Zhu X, Du YP, Jin Y, et al. Appropriate size of magnetic nanoparticles for various bioapplications in cancer diagnostics and therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:3092–3106. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b10352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bhana S, Lin G, Wang L, Starring H, Mishra SR, Liu G, Huang X. Near-infrared-absorbing gold nanopopcorns with iron oxide cluster core for magnetically amplified photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:11637–11647. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b02741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Guo R, Peng H, Tian Y, Shen S, Yang W. Mitochondria-targeting magnetic composite nanoparticles for enhanced phototherapy of cancer. Small. 2016;12:4541–4552. doi: 10.1002/smll.201601094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Espinosa A, Di Corato R, Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, Flaud P, Pellegrino T, Wilhelm C. Duality of iron oxide nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Amplification of heating efficiency by magnetic hyperthermia and photothermal bimodal treatment. ACS Nano. 2016;10:2436–2446. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]