Skip to main content
World Journal of Oncology logoLink to World Journal of Oncology
. 2017 May 4;8(2):53–57. doi: 10.14740/wjon998w

Gliosarcoma in Young Adults: A Rare Variant of Glioblastoma

Neha Kakkar a, Jaspreet Kaur a,d, Gunjesh Kumar Singh a, Pragya Singh b, Fouzia Siraj c, Ajay Gupta a
PMCID: PMC5649997  PMID: 29147435

Abstract

Gliosarcoma is a rare central nervous system (CNS) malignancy. It is characterized by classical biphasic histological pattern with both glial and sarcomatous components, often seen in fifth and sixth decade of life. They are generally located in the supratentorial region. Due to its rarity, exact treatment recommendations are not available in literature. Since it is considered as a variant of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), it is treated with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide-based chemotherapy. We present a series of four cases of this rare malignancy that were treated at our institute.

Keywords: Gliosarcoma, Surgery, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Young adults, Outcome

Introduction

Gliosarcoma is a rare primary malignant tumor of central nervous system with reported incidence being 0.59-0.76% of all adult brain tumors. It has a biphasic morphological pattern with both glial and malignant mesenchymal components. It is considered as a variant of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) representing only 2% of all GBM cases [1]. It usually affects fifth and sixth decade of life (average age of onset is 54 years) with slight male preponderance (males being affected twice as often as females) [2]. Therapeutic modalities are surgical resection, external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy but prognosis remains poor in terms of survival [3]. We present here four cases of gliosarcoma who were treated at our institute (Table 1).

Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Treatment Details.

Patients 1 2 3 4
Age 35 years 35 years 16 years 23 years
Sex Male Female Male Female
Site of tumor Frontal lobe Parieto-occipital lobe Fronto-temporo-parietal region Frontal lobe
Surgery Complete macroscopic tumor removal Gross total excision Fronto-temporo-parietal craniotomy with cyst decompression and excision Gross total excision
Radiotherapy 60 Gy/30 fractions
Over 6 weeks with concurrent temozolmide
60 Gy/30 fractions
Over 6 weeks with concurrent temozolmide
60 Gy/30 fractions
Over 6 weeks with concurrent temozolmide
60 Gy/30 fractions
Over 6 weeks with concurrent temozolmide
Chemotherapy Six cycles with temozolomide Six cycles with temozolomide Six cycles with temozolomide Six cycles with temozolomide
Follow-up (months) Recurrence after 1.5 years, re-excision followed by six cycles chemotherapy with temozolomide. Now on follow-up for 9 months 6 months 4 months 11 months

Case Reports

Case 1

A 35-year-old gentleman presented in 2012 to neurosurgery outpatient department with complaints of headache and vomiting for 1 month. There was no deficit in neurocognitive functions. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) of head was done which showed an approximately 6.5 × 4.4 cm sized heterogeneous lesion containing multiple necrotic areas in left frontal region surrounded by significant vasogenic edema. Moderate mass effect was seen over left lateral ventricle with midline shift of approximately 18 - 19 mm towards right side. Patient underwent left fronto-temporo-parietal flap craniectomy with C-patch duraplasty and complete macroscopic tumor removal. Postoperative histopathology report showed features of gliosarcoma, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) focal positivity with spindle cells showing vimentin positivity and desmin negativity. Patient was started on adjuvant radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide followed by six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide and kept on regular follow-up. After a period of 1.5 years after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, patient developed recurrence of measuring approximately 2.2 × 1.3 cm in left fronto-temporal region. The lesion appeared as hyperdense enhancing mass on contract-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan. The patient underwent re-excision of the recurrent mass and was again started on temozolomide-based chemotherapy with the dose of 250 mg daily for 5 days every 28 days for six cycles and is on follow-up since 9 months.

Case 2

A 35-year-old female presented to neurosurgery department of our institute, with complaints of predominantly left-sided headache, vomiting and right-sided weakness for the last 2 months. There was no associated history of seizures, visual disturbances, fever or loss of consciousness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain showed heterogeneously enhancing mass measuring 4.9 × 8.4 × 4.5 cm with large central necrosis and perilesional edema seen in parieto-occipital lobe (Fig. 1a). A complete metastatic workup was done, which showed no evidence of disease elsewhere. Mass was completely excised in the neurosurgery department (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MRI of brain showing hyperintensity in the parieto-occipital lobe of brain (a). MRI of brain showing postoperative defect after complete excision of tumor (b).

Histopathological examination revealed gliosarcoma (Fig. 2). Patient was referred to our department for postoperative radiotherapy. On examination, patient’s general condition was stable. She was fully conscious, cooperative and well oriented to time and space. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 1. All the baseline blood investigations were normal. Patient was treated by concurrent chemoradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with temozolomide (dose 75 mg/m2) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide (dose 250 mg/m2) for 5 days every 28 days for six cycles. She is now on follow-up since 6 months.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Tumor cells arranged in diffused sheets with areas of necrosis and vascular endothelial proliferation (× 40). Cells show marked nuclear atypia, pleomorphism and hyperchromasia along with atypical mitosis and focal areas of elongated and spindle shaped tumor cells.

Case 3

A 16-year-old male child was referred to us who had progressed from low grade astrocytoma to gliosarcoma over a long period of 15 years. The child was diagnosed as a case of pilocytic astrocytoma at 6 months of age (in September 2000). The presenting signs and symptoms were progressive increase in head size for 3 weeks with tense and bulging fontanelle, refusal to take feed for 2 days and loss of consciousness for 1 day. CECT scan of head revealed a large cystic space occupying lesion of size 13.7 × 6.7 cm replacing most of the left cerebral hemisphere with an enhancing soft tissue component in its wall suggestive of pilocytic astrocytoma. The infant underwent tapping of tumor cyst followed by left parietal craniotomy and excision of tumor. The postoperative histopathology report showed features suggestive of pilocytic astrocytoma. The child was not planned for any adjuvant radiation and was kept on regular follow-up.

Patient was referred to our center when he developed presenting complaints of headache on and off with multiple episodes of vomiting and disturbance of gait for 1 month at the age of 16 years. On examination, his Glasgow coma score (GCS) was E4M5V6 (15/15) and power was grade 4/5 in right side upper and lower limbs and 5/5 with normal tone and reflexes on the left side. On further investigation, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) of brain showed a well-defined extra-axial collection in left fronto-temporo-parieto-occipital region with nodular thickening of the meninges on the medial aspect of collection displaying intense enhancement on post-contrast images. A patchy ill-defined non-enhancing edema was noted in left temporo-parietal region which was further continuous in the posterior fossa extending into left CP angle compressing and displacing the midbrain and pons towards right. The significant mass effect on the left lateral ventricle with midline shift towards right was seen. CECT scan of head was also done which revealed ill-defined multilobulated, cystic solid lesion measuring approximately 10 × 6 × 6.5 cm, with significant enhancement on post-contrast study, involving left occipito-parietal region with soft tissue contents of lesion being hyperdense and cystic contents hypodense. A large hypodense concavo-convex collection was also seen in left fronto-parieto-occipito-temporal region causing significant mass effect in form of displacement of midline structures towards right side by 21 mm causing compression of ventricular system resulting in hydrocephalus without any evidence of hemorrhage. Atrophy of left cerebral hemisphere was seen. Thus, the features on CECT suggested pilocytic astrocytoma with cyst rupture resulting in left subdural collection with obstructive hydrocephalus.

The patient underwent left fronto-temporo-parietal craniotomy with cyst decompression and excision of the tumor. Postoperative histopathology report showed features of high grade malignant tumor with variable morphology in the lateral and medial aspects. On the lateral aspect, the tumor cells showed mainly papillary and perivascular arrangement with cells being round to ovoid in shape with moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm and markedly pleomorphic round nuclei. Brisk mitotic activity and necrosis was also noted. On IHC, the tumor cells showed diffuse positivity with GFAP and were negative for epithelial membrane antigen. On the medial aspect, the tumor cells were predominantly oval to spindle in shape, arranged in interlacing fascicles and bundles, showing marked nuclear atypia and brisk mitoses. Tumor giant cells were interspersed. Occasional papillary configuration was also noted. On IHC, the tumor cells in sarcomatous areas showed diffuse positivity for vimentin, while the glial areas are highlighted by GFAP. CSF cytology showed no presence of malignant cells. Chest X-ray and ultrasound of abdomen were done to assess for any distant metastases, which were reported as normal studies. The child received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and is being followed up since 4 months.

Case 4

A 23-year-old female patient had developed complaints of giddiness and two episodes of loss of consciousness for 10 days. She also complained of headache and vomiting for 3 days before she was investigated. The patient did not have any neurological deficit. CECT scan showed solid and cystic lesion measuring 4.7 × 5.7 cm in right frontal region with perifocal edema. The solid component of the lesion was contrast enhancing while the cystic part was non-enhancing. Mass effect was seen causing compression over right lateral ventricle with midline shift and subfalcine herniation to left with descending transtentorial herniation. The patient underwent right frontal free bone flap craniotomy and gross total excision of tumor. Histopathology report showed features of mixed spindle cell and glial tumor. The spindle cell component shows a fascicular architecture with moderate nuclear pleomorphism and collagenous stroma. A few atypical mitotic figures were seen. The spindle cell confluent was seen to intimately infiltrate and intermingle with the glial component. The glial component showed mild hypercellularity of astrocytic cells. Oligodendroglial cells were also noted. No necrosis was seen. IHC of tumor cells was immunopositive for vimentin and GFAP. Immunostain for IDH and reticulin was noncontributory. The final impression was gliosarcoma WHO grade 4. The patient was treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide.

Discussion

Gliosarcoma was first described by Stroebe in 1895. Gliosarcoma is an uncommon brain tumor and the reported incidence is 1-8% of all malignant gliomas and thus represents an exceptionally rare malignancy [1]. It is a mixed tumor with components of both gliomatous and sarcomatous elements. Since the glial component is histologically similar to typical glioblastoma tissue, it shares similar clinical and genetic features [4]. Exact pathogenesis is unknown, but earlier it has been postulated that the sarcomatous components originated from malignant transformation of hyperplastic blood vessels commonly found in high grade gliomas [5, 6]. Many studies have revealed identical genetic alterations in terms of chromosomal aberrations and cytogenetic imbalances and identical p53 mutations in the gliomatous and sarcomatous components of gliosarcoma, proving their monoclonal origin [7].

Gliosarcoma usually presents in age of 50 - 60 years [2]. However, in this series, all the cases were seen in young age. The median age of presentation was 45 years in a series of 27 cases of primary gliosarcoma [8]. The younger age of distribution was also seen in two other series from India and may be due to geographical variation of presentation of gliosarcoma [9, 10].

Gliosarcomas are generally located in supratentorial region with the commonest site being temporal region followed by the frontal, parietal and occipital lobes [11]. In a series by Kumar et al, 37.5% of patients had primary gliosarcoma located in temporal lobe [10]. Here in one case tumor was located in parieto-occipital lobe which is an uncommon location site for gliosarcoma while in another case, a large cystic mass was seen occupying left fronto-temporo-parietal region with multiple calcific foci in soft tissue components. Though distant metastasis to lung, bone and lymph nodes has been reported in the literature, no systemic metastasis was seen in this series [12].

Treatment for gliosarcoma is similar to GBM [13] as the precise treatment recommendations are still not available due to small number of patients in the available case series and case reports. Thus, tumor resection, postoperative radiation therapy, and chemotherapy with nitrosureas, misonidazole, dacarbazine, mithramycin, ametophterin, thalidomide, temozolomide, irinotecan, vincristine, cisplatin, or doxorubicin are the treatment modalities for gliosarcoma [13]. Treatment with concurrent chemoradiation with temozolomide is suggested to improve overall survival [14]. But the prognosis remains in dismay despite of treatment with the mean survival being 13 months (6.9 - 19.4 months) [3, 15].

Adjuvant radiotherapy dose is generally 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks delivered in two phases though hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy/15 fractions) can be given in patients with poor performance status [16]. Phase I planning (46 Gy/23 fractions/4.5 weeks) is done taking into account the initial tumor and edema with sufficient margins followed by boost to tumor bed in phase II planning (14 Gy/7 fractions/1.5 weeks). Adjuvant radiotherapy improves median survival as documented in a study by Perry et al [17]. The adjuvant radiotherapy is added with concurrent chemotherapy temozolomide 75 mg/m2 followed by six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide 150 - 200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 4 weeks as per Stupp regimen [18]. Stupp regimen results in better survival when compared to RT alone (though not statistically significant) as reported in a study by Salvati et al [7]. In the Indian series of 27 cases of gliosarcoma, the median overall survival (OS) reported was 16.7 months and 2-year OS was 32.6% [8]. Further improvement in survival can be achieved by more conformal dose delivery techniques and finding novel therapies for treatment with the help of molecular studies with more focus on biology of gliosarcoma.

In this series, we have reported four cases of gliosarcoma who have been treated on the lines of GBM. All the cases are being followed up regularly to look into the natural course of the tumor.

Conclusion

Gliosarcoma is a rare central nervous system malignancy. Here we have reported four cases of gliosarcoma. As gliosarcoma is considered as a variant of GBM, it is treated similarly to GBM but optimum treatment recommendations are yet to be defined. Gliosarcoma carries poor prognosis. The studies focusing on cellular and molecular biology of gliosarcoma are required which would aid in identifying new modalities of treatment and bring hope to improve outcomes in patients diagnosed with gliosarcoma.

References

  • 1.Kozak KR, Mahadevan A, Moody JS. Adult gliosarcoma: epidemiology, natural history, and factors associated with outcome. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(2):183–191. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.di Norcia V, Piccirilli M, Giangaspero F, Salvati M. Gliosarcomas in the elderly: analysis of 7 cases and clinico-pathological remarks. Tumori. 2008;94(4):493–496. doi: 10.1177/030089160809400409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lutterbach J, Guttenberger R, Pagenstecher A. Gliosarcoma: a clinical study. Radiother Oncol. 2001;61(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00415-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Galanis E, Buckner JC, Dinapoli RP, Scheithauer BW, Jenkins RB, Wang CH, O'Fallon JR. et al. Clinical outcome of gliosarcoma compared with glioblastoma multiforme: North Central Cancer Treatment Group results. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(3):425–430. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.3.0425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feigin IH, Gross SW. Sarcoma arising in glioblastoma of the brain. Am J Pathol. 1955;31(4):633–653. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khanna M, Siraj F, Chopra P, Bhalla S, Roy S. Gliosarcoma with prominent smooth muscle component (gliomyosarcoma): a report of 10 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54(1):51–54. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.77324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Salvati M, Caroli E, Raco A, Giangaspero F, Delfini R, Ferrante L. Gliosarcomas: analysis of 11 cases do two subtypes exist? J Neurooncol. 2005;74(1):59–63. doi: 10.1007/s11060-004-5949-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rath GK, Sharma DN, Mallick S, Gandhi AK, Joshi NP, Haresh KP, Gupta S. et al. Clinical outcome of patients with primary gliosarcoma treated with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide: A single institutional analysis of 27 cases. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52(4):599–603. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.178407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Biswas A, Kumar N, Kumar P, Vasishta RK, Gupta K, Sharma SC, Patel F. et al. Primary gliosarcoma - clinical experience from a regional cancer centre in north India. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25(6):723–729. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.570881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kumar P, Singh S, Krishnani N, Datta NR. Gliosarcoma: an audit from a single institution in India of 24 post-irradiated cases over 15 years. J Cancer Res Ther. 2008;4(4):164–168. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.44286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vukelic Z, Kalanj-Bognar S, Froesch M, Bindila L, Radic B, Allen M, Peter-Katalinic J. et al. Human gliosarcoma-associated ganglioside composition is complex and distinctive as evidenced by high-performance mass spectrometric determination and structural characterization. Glycobiology. 2007;17(5):504–515. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwm012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weaver D, Vandenberg S, Park TS, Jane JA. Selective peripancreatic sarcoma metastases from primary gliosarcoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(3):599–601. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.3.0599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Prados MD, Parsa AT. Primary gliosarcoma: key clinical and pathologic distinctions from glioblastoma with implications as a unique oncologic entity. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(3):313–320. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9973-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Walker GV, Gilbert MR, Prabhu SS, Brown PD, McAleer MF. Temozolomide use in adult patients with gliosarcoma: an evolving clinical practice. J Neurooncol. 2013;112(1):83–89. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-1029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Chang SM, Parsa AT. Secondary gliosarcoma: a review of clinical features and pathological diagnosis. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(1):26–32. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.JNS081081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kumar N, Bhattacharyya T, Chanchalani K, Shalunke P, Radotra BD, Yadav BS. Impact of changing trends of treatment on outcome of cerebral gliosarcoma: A tertiary care centre experience. South Asian J Cancer. 2015;4(1):15–17. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.149931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perry JR, Ang LC, Bilbao JM, Muller PJ. Clinicopathologic features of primary and postirradiation cerebral gliosarcoma. Cancer. 1995;75(12):2910–2918. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2910::AID-CNCR2820751219>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK. et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459–466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Oncology are provided here courtesy of Elmer Press

RESOURCES