Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Hematol. 2017 May 10;54(2):81–86. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2017.05.002

GATA2 deficiency and related myeloid neoplasms

Marcin W Wlodarski a,b,*, Matthew Collin c, Marshall S Horwitz d
PMCID: PMC5650112  NIHMSID: NIHMS878314  PMID: 28637621

Abstract

The GATA2 gene codes for a hematopoietic transcription factor that through its two zinc fingers (ZF) can occupy GATA-DNA motifs in a countless number of genes. It is crucial for the proliferation and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. During the past 5 years, germline heterozygous mutations in GATA2 were reported in several hundred patients with various phenotypes ranging from mild cytopenia to severe immunodeficiency involving B cells, natural killer cells, CD4+ cells, monocytes and dendritic cells (MonoMAC/DCML), and myeloid neoplasia. Some patients additionally show syndromic features such as congenital deafness and lymphedema (originally defining the Emberger syndrome) or pulmonary disease and vascular problems. The common clinical denominator in all reported cohorts is the propensity for myeloid neoplasia (myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], myeloproliferative neoplasms [MPN], chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML], acute myeloid leukemia [AML]) with an overall prevalence of approximately 75% and a median age of onset of roughly 20 years. Three major mutational types are encountered in GATA2-deficient patients: truncating mutations prior to ZF2, missense mutations within ZF2, and noncoding variants in the +9.5kb regulatory region of GATA2. Recurrent somatic lesions comprise monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 karyotypes and mutations in SETBP1 and ASXL1 genes. The high risk for progression to advanced myeloid neoplasia and life-threatening infectious complications guide decision-making towards timely stem cell transplantation.

Keywords: Genetic predisposition, GATA2 deficiency, Familial MDS, MonoMAC, Emberger syndrome, Monosomy 7, Bone marrow failure

1. Introduction

Since its initial description in 2011, GATA2 deficiency has been recognized as a major myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) predisposition syndrome, with nearly 400 patients reported in several case series (Table 1). The phenotypic bias of the reported cohorts with GATA2-related disease exemplifies the clinical heterogeneity of this transcriptopathy disorder. Previously established clinical entities known to be caused by GATA2 mutations include monocytopenia and Mycobacterium avium complex (MonoMAC)/den-dritic cell, monocyte, B and NK lymphoid deficiency (DCML) (MIM #614172) [14], Emberger syndrome (MIM #614038) [5,6], and familial MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (MIM 601626 and 614286) [7]. Additional recurrent manifestations include primary pediatric MDS [8] and chronic neutropenia [9]. However, due to considerable phenotypic overlaps in affected patients these entities are now recognized as a single disorder with pleiotropic manifestations and high risk for myeloid neoplasia [8,1012]. Experimental and clinical evidence implicates that loss of function of GATA2 leads to aberrant hematopoiesis with resulting myeloid neoplasia, often associated with acquisition of certain cytogenetic aberrations or somatic gain of function mutations.

Table 1.

Prevalence of GATA-related myeloid neoplasia.

Year reported Author PMID Screening cohort No. of GATA2-mutated cases No. of cases with myeloid neoplasia Age at Dx of myeloid neoplasia; median (range), years Monosomy 7 &der(1;7), % Trisomy 8, %
2011 Hahn7 21892162 Familial MDS/AML 28 15 10–53 (20.5) 50 10
2011 Ostergaard6 21892158 Emberger syndrome 14 8 9–53 (12) 75 0
2012 Bodor*47 22271902 Familial MDS 5 2 18–23 (20.5) 2/2 0
2012 Kazenwadel39 22147895 MDS/AML 10 9 10–33 (16) 44 11
2012 Holme45 22533337 Familial MDS 4 4 12–48 (20) 25 0
2013 Pasquet9 23223431 Chronic neutropenia 14 10 6–35 (15) 70 0
2013 Hsu48 23502222 MonoMAC 32 20 3–78 (21.5) n.a. n.a.
2014 Spinner12 24227816 GATA2 deficiency 57 42 0.4–78 (19) 21 24
2014 West50 24077845 GATA2 deficiency 48 42 12–78 (35.5) 20 22.5
2014 Dickinson41 24345756 GATA2 deficiency 30 11 4–40 (25) 18 18
2015 Mir*42 25619630 Myeloid neoplasms 5 3 7–38 (22.5) 0 0
2015 Ganapathi41 25359990 GATA2 deficiency 28 28 14–60 (30) 23 23
2015 Churpek69 26492932 Familial MDS 7 6 13–68 (16.5) 0 25
2015 Wang51 26022708 Pediatric MDS 6 5 n.a. 80 20
2015 Zhang52 25239263 Pediatric MDS 5 5 12–22 (16) 0 40
2016 Wlodarski8 26702063 Pediatric MDS 60 57 3–19 (12) 75 9
2016 Novakova43 27013649 Pediatric MDS 12 10 4.4–17 (14.5) 80 10
2017 Schlums49 28209719 GATA2 deficiency 13 5 7–60 (18) n.a. n.a.
Total/avg 378 282 (75%) 19.7 (12–35.5) 41% 15%

Dx = diagnosis; N.a. = data not available.

*

Not included in summary statistics for karyotypes due to low number of reported cases.

2. Mechanistic principles

GATA2 is a nuclear regulatory protein, a member of evolutionary conserved family of transcription factors that regulate the expression of multiple target genes by binding to the consensus DNA sequence T/A(GATA)A/G located in numerous promoters and enhancers [13]. GATA1, GATA2, and GATA3 are primarily expressed in hematopoietic cells [1], whereas GATA4, GATA5, and GATA6 are mainly restricted to tissues of mesodermal and endodermal origin, eg, heart and gut [14].

The human GATA2 gene is positioned on the long arm of chromosome 3 at position 21.3 (3q21.3) and depending on the isoform, it consists of 6 or 7 exons. Its transcription is initiated from the first two exons. The proximal IG exon is exploited in all tissues expressing GATA2, while the distal IS exon is specific for hematopoietic and neuronal cells [15-17]. GATA2 protein contains two highly conserved zinc finger domains (C-ZnF and N-ZnF) responsible for its DNA-binding ability and interaction with other proteins [13]. Additionally, other non-finger domains are distinguished: two transactivation domains, a nuclear localization signal, and a negative regulatory domain [18,19].

GATA2 is highly expressed in immature hematopoietic cells and declines with blood cell maturation. It is crucial for the proliferation and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [13,20]. High GATA2 expression was observed in hematopoietic progenitor cells, early erythroid cells, mast cells, and megakaryocytes [20,21]. However, it is not limited to the hematopoietic lineage, as it can be expressed in endothelial cells, fetal liver, fetal heart, placenta, and central nervous system [15,22-24]. GATA2 gene expression is controlled by a variety of cis-regulatory elements including -77kb (human -110kb), -3.9kb, -2.8kb, -1.8kb, and +9.5 kb (containing E-box regulatory site). Those sites can be occupied by multiple factors affecting gene transcription. GATA2 can bind itself to the sites upstream the gene locus leading to positive autoregulation. It selectively occupies -2.8kb site in the transcriptionally active state in HSCs and progenitor cells, whereas its displacement by GATA1 in erythromyeloid progenitors results in repression of GATA2 transcription [25,26]. It has been observed that -1.8kb site is required to restrain GATA2 expression in late-stage erythroblasts in vivo [27]. This dynamic transition of GATA factors expression referred as the “GATA switch” plays a critical role in differentiation of hematopoietic cells. It is responsible for the maintenance of erythroid homeostasis by the transcriptional regulation of multiple erythroid genes [28].

3. Role in leukemic transformation

GATA2 plays a pivotal role in HSCs emergence from hemogenic endothelium in the process called endothelial to hematopoietic transition (Fig. 1) [29]. Subsequently, it is essential for the maintenance and proliferation of HSCs by the complex interactions with a network of other hematopoietic transcription factors, eg, RUNX1, SCL/TAL1, MYB, GFI1, FLI1, LYL1, or PU.1 [21,29]. Balanced expression of GATA2 is essential for proper hematopoiesis and the disruption of its structure and/or activity can contribute to leukemogenesis. GATA2 overexpression is associated with development of AML and correlates with poor prognosis [30]. Among the cases with normal karyotype, GATA2 overexpression coincided with FLT3-ITD, NPM1 mutations and with WT1 or EVI1 over-expresson [31]. Somatic GATA2 mutations GATA2 are frequent (∼10%) in intermediate-risk karyotype AML with biallelic CEBPA mutations and are associated with favorable prognosis. Most of the reported somatic mutations are located within ZF1, with p. Leu321Phe being the most prevalent [32,33]. Confirmed gain-of-function mutation p. Leu359Val (ZF2) had been identified in 10% of cases with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) during blast transformation [34]. Furthermore, it has been reported that rearrangement of GATA2 distal enhancer -77kb, resulting from chromosomal aberrations inv(3)(q21q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) promotes leukemic transformation [35,36]. Through structural repositioning the regulatory element is displaced into close proximity of EVI1, resulting in its misexpression in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). This disengagement leads to “somatic” GATA2 haploinsufficiency, consequently disrupting homeostasis of hematopoietic progenitors.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mechanistic principles. GATA2 is involved in the emergence of hematopoietic stem cells from hemogenic endothelium. Later, it is essential for the home-ostasis and proliferation of HSCs, at the expense of proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs).

Complete deficiency of GATA2 in a knockout mouse model results in embryonic lethal phenotype due to failure in initial blood cell production [21]. Notably, haploid dose of GATA2 in a haploinsufficient mouse model results in defective HSC production with a 50% reduction of definitive HSC compartment, without the development of MDS or leukemia [37,38]. In the setting of human GATA2 deficiency, it is unclear how germline loss-of-function mutations result in myeloid neoplasms.

4. Hematological presentation of GATA2-related disease

While the common denominator of clinical phenotype are cytopenias and myeloid neoplasms, the initial presentation can be variable. Some patients present early in life with cytopenias, immunodeficiency and hypocellular bone marrow failure, and can experience severe bacterial and viral infections [4,9,11,39-42]. In other patients MDS with excess of blasts (MDS-EB) can develop sporadically without preexisting clinical features or accessory non-hematological phenotypes pointing towards GATA2 deficiency, and without family history of MDS, possibly attributed to the fact that the initial presentation in such cases might be mild and preceding cytopenias undetected. [7,8,43]. The incidence of GATA2 deficiency is unkown, however due to the high disease penetrance and intolerance to deleterious mutations in GATA2 gene (ExAC database: 12 expected, 0 observed loss-of-function mutations), it can be assumed that the majority of mutation carriers will develop hematologic or immunologic problems throughout life (in one study the penetrance was estimated at 90% by the age of 60 years) [12].

Initial hematologic symptoms can include single lineage cytopenias or pancytopenia; however, in contrast to the MonoMAC phenotype, monocytosis can be the initial presenting sign in patients who develop GATA2-related MDS [1,8,9,11,12,40-42,44]. In some cases there is evidence of immune dysregulation with respective manifestations such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia or immune thrombocytopenia-like manifestation. Morphological features are also heterogenous and can involve marrow hypocel-lularity in patients with cytopenas, and normo- to hypercellular marrow in patients presenting with MDS-EB. Multilineage dysplasia is present in most cases. Other features observed are reticulin fibrosis, reduced numbers of bone marrow B and natural killer (NK) cells, and increased numbers of T-cell large granular lymphocytes. Most patients develop MDS (refractory cytopenia of childhood, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, MDS-EB) with high risk of evolution to AML or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), while rather small subset presents with de novo AML [7,8,12,45,46]. The prevalence of myeloid neoplasia can be estimated at approximately 75% of mutation carriers, according to the numbers provided in published case series with approximately 378 mutation carriers (Table 1) [6-9,11,12,39,41-43, 45-51]. The median age at onset of myeloid neoplasia ranges between 12 and 35.5 years and on average equals 19.7 years (Table 1). In children and adolescents with primary MDS, GATA2 deficiency accounts for 7% of all cases, and 15% of patients with MDS-EB. The most common cytogenetic aberrations are monosomy 7 or der(1;7)(q10;p10) leading to a monosomy 7q and a trisomy 1q. Depending on the screening cohort these aberrations can be present in up to 80% of GATA2-related MDS patients, with average estimate of ∼41% (Table 1). Concurrent cytogenetic lesions in patients with monosomy 7, include trisomy 8, or trisomy 21, while complex karyotypes are generally not observed. Isolated trisomy 8 is the second most common cytogenetic category, with prevalence rates up to 40% and a roughly estimated average of 15% (Table 1). Notably, when investigating consecutive primary MDS cohorts in children and adolescents, 37% of patients with monosomy 7 and 16% of patients with trisomy 8 had an underlying GATA2 deficiency. In conclusion, monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 karyotypes are associated with GATA2 deficiency and their presence can serve as diagnostic “red flag” pointing towards underlying GATA2 deficiency.

5. Immunological features of GATA2 deficiency

The immunodeficiency phenotypes initially reported in association with GATA2 mutation included warts, atypical mycobacterial infection, herpes virus infection and fungal disease [3,4,11,12,40,48]. In addition, GM-CSF antibody negative pulmonary alveolar proteinosis autoimmune cytopenias, panniculitis, arthritis and hepatitis and may affect up to 10% of patients. Death from infection or human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-related neoplasia may occur. These presentations have been referred to as MonoMAC or DCML deficiency to describe the immunodeficiency arising from a profound mononuclear cytopenia that can occur in the absence of MDS or AML, or antecedent by decades. Key features include a dendritic cell deficiency and monocytopenia, loss of transitional B cells, absence of CD56bright NK cells, inverted CD4:CD8 ratio and abundance of terminally differentiated CD45RA+ CD8+ Tcells (so-called T-effector memory RA+ or TEMRA cells). Overall, the cellular phenotype is remarkably close to that seen in chronic infection or age-related immunose-nescence [70]. Generally, immunoglobulin (Ig) is preserved, although patients can become markedly hypogammaglobulinemic and be treated as common variable immune deficiency (CVID). Even those with apparently normal Ig levels may suffer frequent sinopulmonary infections and derive benefit from Ig infusion therapy, suggesting that their humoral responses are of poor quality.

Prior immune deficiency in a patient with MDS is a very strong indicator that GATA2 mutation may be present [3,4,40]. However, immune dysfunction is not an invariable feature of GATA2 mutation. Several cohorts of children and young adults with a high rate of GATA2-associated MDS have been described who do not have clinical manifestations of immune dysfunction at the time of diagnosis [7,8]. The question remains open as to whether silent mononuclear cytopenia preceded hematological transformation in these cases or whether abrupt transformation to MDS/AML is possible without any prodromal signs. It is apparent that long-lived plasma cells, memory T cells and stable immunoglobulin affords a significant level of protection to common pathogens, even when bone marrow function is significantly declining. Therefore, it is not surprising that many patients remain without infectious complications unless they are exposed to mycobacterium, H1N1 influenza or other virulent pathogen. Moreover, prospective study of healthy family members carrying GATA2 mutation, indicates that marked and progressive DCML deficiency can be revealed by immunophenotyping whilst the peripheral blood count remains normal [11]. One study reported that the loss of B cells and their precursors is the most constant feature of GATA2 deficiency, especially in patients who develop MDS when monocytopenia might be masked by progenitor cell expansion and total lymphocyte counts are maintained by expanding memory T cells [43].

Prospective immunophenotyping of more healthy relatives carrying familial GATA2 mutation will be required to answer this question definitively. It is possible that declining mononuclear cells may prove a useful adjunct for monitoring such unaffected ‘carriers’. The value of progressively elevated Flt3 ligand and clonal dominance in the bone marrow have also been evaluated in this context. When a relatively healthy individual is identified with GATA2 mutation, it is desirable to avoid exposure to corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs, and suggest regular monitoring of pulmonary function.

6. Extra-hematopoietic manifestations

There is a wide range of dysmorphic features associated with GATA2 deficiency [1,4-9,11,12]. These include deafness due to congenital sensineural defect, hypotelorism, epicanthic folds, long tapering fingers, neck webbing, behavioral disorder/ADHD, hypothyroidism, urogenital malformations, uni-/bilateral ptosis or hydrops fetalis. Primary lymphedema is a common feature and can generally manifest with delayed onset on the limbs or as testicular hydrocele; however, atypical manifestations can also be expected, eg, occurring in the face (Fig. 2). As with immunodeficiency, the occurrence of these features in young patients with MDS should arouse a suspicion of GATA2 mutation.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Atypical lymphedema manifestation in the preauricular region on the face of a teenage patient diagnosed with GATA2 deficiency.

7. Mutational background

To date more than 100 different germline mutations in GATA2 gene had been identified in roughly 400 reported cases [6-9,11,12,39,41-43,45,47-52]. The mutations are scattered throughout the gene but essentially three main types can be specified (Fig. 3). Truncating mutations (stop gain, indel, splice site) prior or within ZF2 are encountered in roughly 60% of reported cases, followed by missense mutations within ZF2 detected in ∼30% of patients. Thirdly, noncoding variants within intron 4 (NM_032638.4) affecting the +9.5kb regulatory site containing E-box and GATA and ETS elements are detected in up to 10% of patients. Rare aberrations reported in single cases are whole-gene deletions, in-frame deletions, and missense mutations C-terminal of ZF2. Additional reported germline variants of unknown significance (p.Pro41Ala, p.Pro250Ser, p.Pro250Ala) are located outside relevant protein domains. Thus far, only a handful of mutations were functionally studied, including p.Thr354Met, p. Thr355del, p.Ala318Thr, p.Leu321Phe, p.Arg396Gln, p.Thr358Asn, p.Ala350_Asn351ins8, p.Arg361Leu, p.Cys373Arg, p.Leu321Pro, p.Pro304His, and p.Arg330X, which are supposed to be loss-of-function mutations with reduced DNA binding ability and/or transactivation activity [6,7,33,5355]. Conversely, somatic GATA2 mutations p.Leu359Val (ZF2) and p.Gly320Asp (ZF1) identified in adult myeloid malignancies were described as gain-of-function mutations [33,56]. Considering these findings, there is an urgent need to perform more mechanistic studies to elucidate the functional consequences of germline GATA2 mutations.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Mutational spectrum in GATA2 deficiency. Peptide sequence involved in the formation of zinc finger (ZnF) 1 and 2 is shown. The majority of germline mutations are truncating mutations ocurring prior or within zinc finger 2 (ZnF2) or missense mutations within ZnF2, while noncoding mutations within +9.5kb regulatory site can be present in up to 10% of patients.

To date, no significant genotype–phenotype association has been established. Although one study reported a possible association of null mutations with lymphedema and severe infections [39], this association could not be confirmed in other cohort studies [8,57]. It can be estimated that approximately 20%–30% of all germ-line mutations are inherited while others occur de novo [8,10 ].

8. Clonal evolution and acquired genetic changes

While roughly 75% of GATA2-deficient patients develop mye-loid neoplasia (Table 1), the drivers of myeloid transformation are not entirely known. Concurrent ASXL1 mutations have been reported in a number of patients with GATA2-related MDS and were postulated as a collaborating event in the development of myeloid neoplasia [47,50,58]. However, this association seems to arise from the bias of monosomy 7, which is the most frequent karyotype in GATA2-related MDS. When investigating larger cohorts of patients primary MDS and monosomy 7, there was no difference in the frequency of ASXL1 mutations between patients with or without germline GATA2 mutation [5961]. Other mutations recurrently encountered in GATA2-related MDS are gain-of-function hotspot SETBP1 mutations [60]. These mutations are common in AML, CMML, and atypical CML, and they are thought to act as strong oncogenic drivers [62,63]. Interestingly, analysis of bone marrow of patients with GATA2-related MDS at the single-cell level revealed a nonrandom nature of clonal evolution, with monosomy 7 developing as an early somatic event that seems to be followed by the acquisition of SETBP1 and ASXL1 mutations (Pastor and Wlodarski, unpublished observations).

9. Therapy and prognostic considerations

Early diagnosis of GATA2-deficiency should help limiting the use of non-curative therapies specifically avoiding immunosuppression. It is evident that AML-type chemotherapy should be avoided in GATA2-related advanced MDS due to the underlying immunodeficiency and stem cell defect. The high risk for progression to advanced disease with high-risk karyotypes guides the decision-making towards timely HSC transplantation (HSCT); however, there is no clear evidence to advocate for early an HSCT in GATA2 mutation carriers who are phenotypically silent. However, it is well accepted that HSCT should be performed before the patients develop MDS-EB with karyotypic abnormalities, severe immunodeficiency with systemic infections, or severe lung disease. The ideal time window for HSCT in GATA2-deficient patients is considered to be during the phase with marrow hypocellularity and before manifestation of severe complications (ie, invasive infections) or development of monosomy 7 and/or blast increase [6468].

No reliable estimates exist on the outcomes GATA2-deficient patients within prospective cohorts. The National Institutes of Health reported a survival rate of 54% at 4 years after HSCT in 21 GATA2-deficient patients transplanted for myeloid neoplasia or immunodeficiency [12]. Notably, in pediatric consecutive MDS cohorts, when examining GATA2 mutational status according to MDS subtypes, GATA2 mutational status did not confer poor prognosis [8]. The comparably favorable 5-year overall survival of 66% in GATA2-deficient children transplanted for MDS with monosomy 7 likely results from the younger age and the lower rate of systemic complications. The preparative regimen for HSCT in GATA2-related MDS can be guided by the known MDS risk factors such as cytogenetic evolution, severity of cytopenias, and advanced disease. These considerations support the need for a close monitoring of patients at risk for the occurrence of any of these complications, with individually tailored surveillance strategies.

Acknowledgments

The authors cordially thank Emilia Kozyra, Sushree Sahoo, and Victor Pastor (Wlodarski Lab, Freiburg) for their helpful comments, helping to prepare the manuscript, and for preparing figures and tables. This work was supported by BMBF DKTK German Cancer Consortium, Molecular Diagnostics of Pediatric Malignancies, the E-RARE EuroDBA Consortium Grant (BMBF #01GM1301 and 01GM1609) and German Cancer Aid (Max Eder Grant No. 109005) to MWW, and Bloodwise Grant No. 14004 to MC, and NIH R01HL130472 to MSH.

References

  • 1.Bigley V, Collin M. Dendritic cell, monocyte, B and NK lymphoid deficiency defines the lost lineages of a new GATA-2 dependent myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica. 2011;96(8):1081–3. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.048355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bigley V, Haniffa M, Doulatov S, et al. The human syndrome of dendritic cell, monocyte, B and NK lymphoid deficiency. J Exp Med. 2011;208(2):227–34. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dickinson RE, Griffin H, Bigley V, et al. Exome sequencing identifies GATA-2 mutation as the cause of dendritic cell, monocyte, B and NK lymphoid deficiency. Blood. 2011;118(10):2656–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-360313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hsu AP, Sampaio EP, Khan J, et al. Mutations in GATA2 are associated with the autosomal dominant and sporadic monocytopenia and mycobacterial infection (MonoMAC) syndrome. Blood. 2011;118(10):2653–5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-356352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mansour S, Connell F, Steward C, et al. Emberger syndrome-primary lymphedema with myelodysplasia: report of seven new cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(9):2287–96. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ostergaard P, Simpson MA, Connell FC, et al. Mutations in GATA2 cause primary lymphedema associated with a predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (Emberger syndrome) Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):929–31. doi: 10.1038/ng.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hahn CN, Chong CE, Carmichael CL, et al. Heritable GATA2 mutations associated with familial myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1012–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wlodarski MW, Hirabayashi S, Pastor V, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis of GATA2-related myelodysplastic syndromes in children and adolescents. Blood. 2016;127(11):1387–97. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-669937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pasquet M, Bellanne-Chantelot C, Tavitian S, et al. High frequency of GATA2 mutations in patients with mild chronic neutropenia evolving to MonoMac syndrome, myelodysplasia, and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(5):822–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-447367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Collin M, Dickinson R, Bigley V. Haematopoietic and immune defects associated with GATA2 mutation. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(2):173–87. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dickinson RE, Milne P, Jardine L, et al. The evolution of cellular deficiency in GATA2 mutation. Blood. 2014;123(6):863–74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-517151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spinner MA, Sanchez LA, Hsu AP, et al. GATA2 deficiency: a protean disorder of hematopoiesis, lymphatics, and immunity. Blood. 2014;123(6):809–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-515528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Orkin SH. Gata-binding transcription factors in hematopoietic-cells. Blood. 1992;80(3):575–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Laverriere AC, MacNeill C, Mueller C, Poelmann RE, Burch JB, Evans T. GATA-4/5/6, a subfamily of three transcription factors transcribed in developing heart and gut. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(37):23177–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dorfman DM, Wilson DB, Bruns GA, Orkin SH. Human transcription factor GATA-2. Evidence for regulation of preproendothelin-1 gene expression in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(2):1279–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wieser R, Volz A, Vinatzer U, et al. Transcription factor GATA-2 gene is located near 3q21 breakpoints in myeloid leukemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;273(1):239–45. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pan X, Minegishi N, Harigae H, et al. Identification of human GATA-2 gene distal IS exon and its expression in hematopoietic stem cell fractions. J Biochem. 2000;127(1):105–12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Minegishi N, Suzuki N, Yokomizo T, et al. Expression and domain-specific function of GATA-2 during differentiation of the hematopoietic precursor cells in midgestation mouse embryos. Blood. 2003;102(3):896–905. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Viger RS, Guittot SM, Anttonen M, Wilson DB, Heikinheimo M. Role of the GATA family of transcription factors in endocrine development, function, and disease. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22(4):781–98. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsai FY, Orkin SH. Transcription factor GATA-2 is required for proliferation/survival of early hematopoietic cells and mast cell formation, but not for erythroid and myeloid terminal differentiation. Blood. 1997;89(10):3636–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsai FY, Keller G, Kuo FC, et al. An early haematopoietic defect in mice lacking the transcription factor GATA-2. Nature. 1994;371(6494):221–6. doi: 10.1038/371221a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Minegishi N, Ohta J, Yamagiwa H, et al. The mouse GATA-2 gene is expressed in the para-aortic splanchnopleura and aorta-gonads and mesonephros region. Blood. 1999;93(12):4196–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ng YK, George KM, Engel JD, Linzer DI. GATA factor activity is required for the trophoblast-specific transcriptional regulation of the mouse placental lactogen I gene. Development. 1994;120(11):3257–66. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.11.3257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nardelli J, Thiesson D, Fujiwara Y, Tsai FY, Orkin SH. Expression and genetic interaction of transcription factors GATA-2 and GATA-3 during development of the mouse central nervous system. Dev Biol. 1999;210(2):305–21. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martowicz ML, Grass JA, Boyer ME, Guend H, Bresnick EH. Dynamic GATA factor interplay at a multicomponent regulatory region of the GATA-2 locus. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(3):1724–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406038200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grass JA, Jing H, Kim SI, et al. Distinct functions of dispersed GATA factor complexes at an endogenous gene locus. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(19):7056–67. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01033-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Snow JW, Trowbridge JJ, Fujiwara T, et al. A single cis element maintains repression of the key developmental regulator Gata2. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9):e1001103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Suzuki M, Kobayashi-Osaki M, Tsutsumi S, et al. GATA factor switching from GATA2 to GATA1 contributes to erythroid differentiation. Genes Cells. 2013;18(11):921–33. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gao X, Johnson KD, Chang YI, et al. Gata2 cis-element is required for hematopoietic stem cell generation in the mammalian embryo. J Exp Med. 2013;210(13):2833–42. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shimamoto T, Ohyashiki K, Ohyashiki JH, et al. The expression pattern of erythrocyte/megakaryocyte-related transcription factors GATA-1 and the stem cell leukemia gene correlates with hematopoietic differentiation and is associated with outcome of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1995;86(8):3173–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vicente C, Vazquez I, Conchillo A, et al. Overexpression of GATA2 predicts an adverse prognosis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and it is associated with distinct molecular abnormalities. Leukemia. 2012;26(3):550–4. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fasan A, Eder C, Haferlach C, et al. GATA2 mutations are frequent in intermediate-risk karyotype AML with biallelic CEBPA mutations and are associated with favorable prognosis. Leukemia. 2013;27(2):482–5. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Greif PA, Dufour A, Konstandin NP, et al. GATA2 zinc finger 1 mutations associated with biallelic CEBPA mutations define a unique genetic entity of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;120(2):395–403. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-403220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang SJ, Shi JY, Li JY. GATA-2 L359 V mutation is exclusively associated with CML progression but not other hematological malignancies and GATA-2 P250A is a novel single nucleotide polymorphism. Leuk Res. 2009;33(8):1141–3. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Groschel S, Sanders MA, Hoogenboezem R, et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell. 2014;157(2):369–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yamazaki H, Suzuki M, Otsuki A, et al. A remote GATA2 hematopoietic enhancer drives leukemogenesis in inv(3)(q21;q26) by activating EVI1 expression. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(4):415–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rodrigues NP, Janzen V, Forkert R, et al. Haploinsufficiency of GATA-2 perturbs adult hematopoietic stem-cell homeostasis. Blood. 2005;106(2):477–84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-2989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ling KW, Ottersbach K, van Hamburg JP, et al. GATA-2 plays two functionally distinct roles during the ontogeny of hematopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med. 2004;200(7):871–82. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kazenwadel J, Secker GA, Liu YJ, et al. Loss-of-function germline GATA2 mutations in patients with MDS/AML or MonoMAC syndrome and primary lymphedema reveal a key role for GATA2 in the lymphatic vasculature. Blood. 2012;119(5):1283–91. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-374363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Calvo KR, Vinh DC, Maric I, et al. Myelodysplasia in autosomal dominant and sporadic monocytopenia immunodeficiency syndrome: diagnostic features and clinical implications. Haematologica. 2011;96(8):1221–5. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.041152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ganapathi KA, Townsley DM, Hsu AP, et al. GATA2 deficiency-associated bone marrow disorder differs from idiopathic aplastic anemia. Blood. 2015;125(1):56–70. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-06-580340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mir MA, Kochuparambil ST, Abraham RS, et al. Spectrum of myeloid neoplasms and immune deficiency associated with germline GATA2 mutations. Cancer Med. 2015;4(4):490–9. doi: 10.1002/cam4.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Novakova M, Zaliova M, Sukova M, et al. Loss of B cells and their precursors is the most constant feature of GATA-2 deficiency in childhood myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica. 2016;101(6):707–16. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.137711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Horwitz MS. GATA2 deficiency: flesh and blood. Blood. 2014;123(6):799–800. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-539858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Holme H, Hossain U, Kirwan M, Walne A, Vulliamy T, Dokal I. Marked genetic heterogeneity in familial myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(2):242–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang MY, Keel SB, Walsh T, et al. Genomic analysis of bone marrow failure and myelodysplastic syndromes reveals phenotypic and diagnostic complexity. Haematologica. 2015;100(1):42–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.113456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bodor C, Renneville A, Smith M, et al. Germ-line GATA2 p.THR354MET mutation in familial myelodysplastic syndrome with acquired monosomy 7 and ASXL1 mutation demonstrating rapid onset and poor survival. Haematol Hematol J. 2012;97(6):890–4. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.054361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hsu AP, Johnson KD, Falcone EL, et al. GATA2 haploinsufficiency caused by mutations in a conserved intronic element leads to MonoMAC syndrome. Blood. 2013;121(19):3830–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-452763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schlums H, Jung M, Han H, et al. Adaptive NK cells can persist in patients with GATA2 mutation depleted of stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 2017;129(14):1927–39. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-734236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.West RR, Hsu AP, Holland SM, Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Hickstein DD. Acquired ASXL1 mutations are common in patients with inherited GATA2 mutations and correlate with myeloid transformation. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):276–81. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.090217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang XA, Muramatsu H, Okuno Y, et al. GATA2 and secondary mutations in familial myelodysplastic syndromes and pediatric myeloid malignancies. Haematologica. 2015;100(10):E398–401. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.127092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang MY, Keel SB, Walsh T, et al. Genomic analysis of bone marrow failure and myelodysplastic syndromes reveals phenotypic and diagnostic complexity. Haematologica. 2015;100(1):42–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.113456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Niimi K, Kiyoi H, Ishikawa Y, et al. GATA2 zinc finger 2 mutation found in acute myeloid leukemia impairs myeloid differentiation. Leuk Res Rep. 2013;2(1):21–5. doi: 10.1016/j.lrr.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cortes-Lavaud X, Landecho MF, Maicas M, et al. GATA2 Germline mutations impair GATA2 transcription, causing haploinsufficiency: functional analysis of the p.Arg396Gln mutation. J Immunol. 2015;194(5):2190–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ping N, Sun A, Song Y, et al. Exome sequencing identifies highly recurrent somatic GATA2 and CEBPA mutations in acute erythroid leukemia. Leukemia. 2017;31(1):195–202. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang SJ, Ma LY, Huang QH, et al. Gain-of-function mutation of GATA-2 in acute myeloid transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(6):2076–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711824105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hirabayashi S, Niemeyer CM, Wlodarski MW. Unexpected high frequency of GATA2 mutations in children with non-familial MDS and monosomy 7. 54th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; Saturday,December 8, 2012; Atlanta, GA: Blood. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Micol JB, Abdel-Wahab O. Collaborating constitutive and somatic genetic events in myeloid malignancies: ASXL1 mutations in patients with germline GATA2 mutations. Haematologica. 2014;99(2):201–3. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.101303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kozyra EJ, Hirabayashi S, Loyola VBP, et al. Clonal mutational landscape of childhood myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2015;126(23) [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Loyola VBP, Hirabayashi S, Pohl S, et al. Somatic genetic and epigenetic architecture of myelodysplastic syndromes arising from GATA2 deficiency. Blood. 2015;126(23) [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pastor V, Hirabayashi S, Karow A, et al. Mutational landscape in children with myelodysplastic syndromes is distinct from adults: specific somatic drivers and novel germline variants. Leukemia. 2017;31(3):759–62. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Makishima H, Yoshida K, Nguyen N, et al. Somatic SETBP1 mutations in myeloid malignancies. Nat Genet. 2013;45(8):942–6. doi: 10.1038/ng.2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Piazza R, Valletta S, Winkelmann N, et al. Recurrent SETBP1 mutations in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45(1):18–24. doi: 10.1038/ng.2495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Grossman J, Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Gea-Banacloche J, et al. Nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for GATA2 deficiency. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(12):1940–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Gea-Banacloche J, Freeman AF, et al. Successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for GATA2 deficiency. Blood. 2011;118(13):3715–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-365049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cuellar-Rodriguez J, Hickstein DD, Grossman JK, et al. Nonmyeloablative versus myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for GATA2 deficiency. Blood. 2014;124(21) doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hickstein DD, Shah NN, Freeman A, Zerbe C, Holland SM. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for GATA2 deficiency. Blood. 2016;128(22) [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Saida S, Umeda K, Yasumi T, et al. Successful reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation for GATA2 deficiency before progression of advanced MDS. Pediatr Transplant. 2016;20(2):333–6. doi: 10.1111/petr.12667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Churpek JE, Pyrtel K, Kanchi KL, Shao J, et al. Genomic analysis of germ line and somatic variants in familial myelodysplasia/acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;(22):2484–90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-641100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-04-641100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Strindhall J, Skog M, Ernerudh J, et al. The inverted CD4/CD8 ratio and associated parameters in 66-year-old individuals: the Swedish HEXA immune study. Age (Dordr) 2013;35(3):985–91. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9400-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES