Release of HER2 repression of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) expression mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ mammary carcinoma

Qing-Yun Chong; Ming-Liang You; Vijay Pandey; Arindam Banerjee; Yi-Jun Chen; Han-Ming Poh; Mengyi Zhang; Lan Ma; Tao Zhu; Salundi Basappa; Liang Liu; Peter E Lobie

doi:10.18632/oncotarget.18431

. 2017 Jun 9;8(43):74188–74208. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18431

Release of HER2 repression of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) expression mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ mammary carcinoma

Qing-Yun Chong ¹, Ming-Liang You ^1,², Vijay Pandey ¹, Arindam Banerjee ¹, Yi-Jun Chen ^1,², Han-Ming Poh ^1,², Mengyi Zhang ^1,², Lan Ma ³, Tao Zhu ^4,⁵, Salundi Basappa ⁶, Liang Liu ^7,⁸, Peter E Lobie ^1,^2,^3,⁹

PMCID: PMC5650333 PMID: 29088778

Abstract

HER2+/ER+ breast cancer, a subset of the luminal B subtype, makes up approximately 10% of all breast cancers. The bidirectional crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer contributes to resistance towards both anti-estrogens and HER2-targeted therapies. TFF3 promotes breast cancer progression and has been implicated in anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer. Herein, we investigated the cross-regulation between HER2 and estrogen-responsive TFF3, and the role of TFF3 in mediating trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer. TFF3 expression was decreased by HER2 activation, and increased by inhibition of HER2 with trastuzumab in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells, partially in an ERα-independent manner. In contrast, the forced expression of TFF3 activated the entire HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases (HER1-4). Hence, HER2 negatively regulates its own signalling through the transcriptional repression of TFF3, while trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 results in increased TFF3 expression to compensate for the loss of HER2 signalling. In HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells with acquired trastuzumab resistance, TFF3 expression was markedly upregulated and associated with a corresponding decrease in HER signalling. siRNA mediated depletion or small molecule inhibition of TFF3 decreased the survival and growth advantage of the trastuzumab resistant cells without re-sensitization to trastuzumab. Furthermore, TFF3 inhibition abrogated the enhanced cancer stem cell-like behaviour in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. Collectively, TFF3 may function as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer.

Keywords: trefoil factor 3, breast cancer, HER2, trastuzumab resistance, estrogen receptor

INTRODUCTION

HER2/neu- and estrogen receptor α-positive (HER2+/ER+) breast cancer, a subset of the luminal B subtype, makes up approximately 10% of all breast cancers [1, 2]. Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of HER2, and has been approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for early and metastatic HER2+ breast cancers [3, 4]. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is currently the preferred first-line treatment option for most patients with HER2+ disease regardless of the hormone receptor status [5–7]. However, the bidirectional signalling crosstalk between HER2 and ERα in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer has been reported to contribute to resistance towards both anti-estrogen and HER2-targeted therapies, making efficacious treatment of this group of breast cancer a challenge [6, 8].

The administration of combined anti-estrogen and HER2-targeted therapies in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer has been demonstrated to improve overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to anti-estrogen alone [9–11]. However, it is argued that the conventional trastuzumab with chemotherapy is superior in terms of overall survival (OS) rate as compared to this combination therapy although there has been no direct comparison of the two treatment regimens [6, 8]. In addition, HER2+/ER+ breast cancer has recently been shown to be a heterogeneous subgroup, of which patients could benefit from trastuzumab with chemotherapy, combined anti-estrogen and HER2-targeted therapies, or even anti-estrogen alone [8, 12, 13]. The levels of ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression are postulated to determine patients’ response to these different therapies [8, 12, 13]. However, the current treatment strategy for HER2+/ER+ breast cancer lacks defined standards to stratify patients to their respective optimum treatment, and fails to effectively predict for therapeutic resistance [8]. These findings reinforce the need to improve the current treatment strategy for HER2+/ER+ breast cancer [8]. The identification of novel biomarkers to predict treatment efficacy, and additional therapeutic targets to overcome drug resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer, will be beneficial in facilitating the development of more efficacious therapies for the heterogeneous group of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer [8].

Trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), a member of the trefoil factor family, is predominantly expressed and secreted by the goblet cells lining the mucous membrane of the gastrointestinal tract [14, 15]. TFF3 functions in epithelial restitution and maintenance of the mucosal layer [14, 16], while the aberrant deregulation of its expression and function is likely to contribute to oncogenesis [17, 18]. TFF3 is found to be upregulated in and responsible for, the development and progression of several cancers including gastric cancer [19], hepatocellular carcinoma [20–23], prostate cancer [24], cervical cancer [25], lung adenocarcinoma [26, 27] and breast cancer [28, 29]. Notably, TFF3 has been shown to promote oncogenic transformation of immortalized mammary epithelial cell lines [30], and to possess pro-proliferative [29], anti-apoptotic [29], anti-anoikis [29], pro-metastatic [31] and pro-angiogenic [32] properties in breast cancer. Besides being an estrogen-responsive gene, TFF3 has been shown to increase ERα transcriptional activity in breast cancer, thereby promoting estrogen-independent growth and decreasing sensitivity towards anti-estrogens [29, 33]. Moreover, it has been reported that while TFF3 is upregulated in tamoxifen [29] and aromatase inhibitor resistant breast cancers [34], the depletion or inhibition of TFF3 resulted in re-sensitization of these resistant cells to the respective anti-estrogen [29, 34].

HER2-ERα crosstalk has been postulated to be a key contributor to trastuzumab resistance, which is a major challenge in the treatment of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer [6, 8, 35]. TFF3 is estrogen-regulated and has previously been shown to activate ERα, thereby contributing to anti-estrogen resistance [29]. Therefore, we sought to determine if TFF3 possesses a cross-regulatory relationship with HER2, whether in an ERα-dependent or -independent manner. Herein, we report a novel ERα-independent mechanism of HER2-TFF3 cross-regulation. Furthermore, with the presence of this cross-regulation, we have shown that TFF3 is functionally involved in mediating acquired trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer.

RESULTS

HER2 activation decreases TFF3 expression in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells partially in an ERα-independent manner

Given the bidirectional crosstalk between HER2 and ERα, the transcriptional regulation of estrogen-responsive TFF3 by HER2 in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells was investigated. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) binds EGFR, while heregulin (HRG) binds HER3 and HER4, and all three receptors dimerize with HER2 as the preferred co-receptor in HER2+ breast cancer cells, thus increasing HER2 activity [36]. In order to remove the confounding effect of estrogen-induced TFF3 expression, the experiments were performed under both estrogen-depleted and estrogen-replete conditions. We have performed time and dose-dependent analyses of the effect of EGF and HRG treatment on TFF3 expression as shown in Supplementary Figure 1. The optimum doses of EGF and HRG used in the TFF3 expression studies were 500 ng/ml under estrogen-depleted conditions, and 200 ng/ml under estrogen-replete conditions (Supplementary Figure 1A–1D, left panel). The optimum time points for EGF and HRG treatment that resulted in the greatest decrease in TFF3 mRNA levels were 24 and 48 hours respectively under estrogen-depleted conditions (Supplementary Figure 1A and 1B, right panel). Furthermore, EGF and HRG treatment under estrogen-replete conditions were carried out for 48 hours (Supplementary Figure 1C and 1D), when the greatest E2-stimulated increase in TFF3 mRNA levels was observed. Treatment of BT474 cells with EGF or HRG resulted in a significant decrease in TFF3 promoter luciferase activity, mRNA and protein levels under estrogen-depleted conditions (Figure 1A–1C, left panel). Exogenously administered 17β-estradiol increased TFF3 promoter luciferase activity, mRNA and protein levels, while EGF or HRG treatment markedly abrogated the 17β-estradiol-induced upregulation of TFF3 expression in BT474 cells under estrogen-replete conditions (Figure 1A–1C, right panel). Similarly, treatment with EGF or HRG led to a significant decrease in TFF3 promoter luciferase activity, mRNA and protein levels in MDA-MB-361 cells under both estrogen-depleted and estrogen-replete conditions (Supplementary Figure 2A–2C).

(A–C) *Left*, BT474 cells were treated with 500 ng/ml EGF or HRG for 24 and 48 hours respectively, in phenol-red free media supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS. (A–C) *Right*, BT474 cells were treated with 200 ng/ml EGF or HRG for 48 hours in phenol-red free media supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS in the presence of 100 nM 17β-estradiol. (D–F) BT474 cells were treated with 10 µg/ml trastuzumab for 48 hours in phenol-red free media supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS ± 100 nM 17β-estradiol. (A and D) TFF3 promoter luciferase activity was measured with Renilla luciferase activity as transfection control. TFF3 (B and E) mRNA and (C and F) protein levels were determined by qPCR and western blot respectively, with β-ACTIN as input control. The densitometric analyses of protein bands were performed using ImageJ. (G and H) BT474 cells were treated with 10 µg/ml trastuzumab ± 100 nM 17β-estradiol ± 1 µM Tamoxifen for 48 hours in phenol-red free media supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped FBS. (G) ERE and (H) TFF3 promoter luciferase activities were measured with Renilla luciferase activity as transfection control. UT: untreated; E2: 17β-estradiol; Tras: trastuzumab; Tam: tamoxifen; ERE: estrogen response element. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; NS, no significance.

HER2 inhibition by trastuzumab increases TFF3 expression in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells partially in an ERα-independent manner

The regulation of TFF3 expression upon HER2 inhibition by trastuzumab in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells was also investigated under both estrogen-depleted and -replete conditions. An optimum dose of 10 µg/ml and time point of 48 hours trastuzumab treatment were used in the TFF3 expression studies (Supplementary Figure 1E and 1F). Inhibition of HER2 by trastuzumab significantly increased TFF3 promoter luciferase activity, mRNA and protein levels in BT474 cells under estrogen-depleted conditions (Figure 1D–1F, left panel). Under estrogen-replete conditions, TFF3 promoter-luciferase activity, mRNA and protein levels were significantly increased significantly following treatment with 17β-estradiol, and were further upregulated with trastuzumab treatment in BT474 cells (Figure 1D–1F, right panel).

The transcriptional downregulation of TFF3 by HER activation and upregulation of TFF3 by trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 in BT474 cells was observed to occur partially in an estrogen-independent manner. A selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen, was used to inhibit ERα transcriptional activity to further determine the involvement of ERα in the transcriptional activation of TFF3 by trastuzumab. The effect of tamoxifen on ERα transcriptional activity at the estrogen response element (ERE) sites was also studied as a positive control. The inhibition of HER2 by trastuzumab increased ERα-mediated ERE luciferase activity in BT474 cells (Figure 1G), which is consistent with published data [37–44]. The ERα-mediated ERE-luciferase activity induced by trastuzumab, 17β-estradiol, and the combination of trastuzumab and 17β-estradiol in BT474 cells were dramatically abrogated by tamoxifen (Figure 1G). However, tamoxifen did not significantly decrease transcriptional activity of the TFF3 promoter induced by trastuzumab, and the combination of trastuzumab and 17β-estradiol in BT474 cells (Figure 1H). Hence, these results suggest that trastuzumab-stimulated TFF3 transcription in BT474 cells is partially ERα-independent.

TFF3 mediates the activation of HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells

In order to determine potential TFF3 regulation of HER receptors activity, BT474 cells with stable forced expression of TFF3 were generated. The increased levels of TFF3 mRNA (Supplementary Figure 3A) and protein (Figure 2A) in BT474-TFF3 cells as compared to BT474-VEC cells were verified. The forced expression of TFF3 resulted in increased activation of the entire HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases (HER1–4) in BT474 cells, as indicated by the increased phosphorylation of the HER receptors in BT474-TFF3 cells as compared to BT474-VEC cells (Figure 2A). The total EGFR and HER2 levels were also elevated in BT474-TFF3 cells as compared to BT474-VEC cells (Figure 2A). Concordantly, the two main downstream signalling pathways of the HER receptors were activated, as characterised by an increase in phosphorylation of AKT despite decreased total AKT expression, and particularly an increase in phosphorylation of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) associated with increased expression of p44/42 MAPK (Figure 2A).

(A) BT474-VEC and -TFF3 cells were generated. (B) BT474 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of TFF3 inhibitor AMPC in media supplemented with 5% FBS. Subsequently, the levels of TFF3, phosphorylated and total HER receptors and downstream signalling mediators were analysed using western blot. β-ACTIN was used as input control. The densitometric analyses of protein bands were performed using ImageJ. (C) Activated HER2 decreased TFF3 expression, which in turn reduced TFF3-mediated activation of HER2 signalling in a negative feedback loop. (D) Trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 increased TFF3 expression to compensate for the loss of HER2 signalling.

The HER family forms a complex signalling network involving crosstalk with other receptors, thus activating a multitude of downstream effectors including STAT3 and NFκB [45]. We further investigated the effect of forced expression of TFF3 on these HER-related crosstalk pathways in BT474 cells. We observed that the forced expression of TFF3 increased activation (phosphorylation) of cMET and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor β (IGF1Rβ) (Supplementary Figure 3B), both of which crosstalk with HER2 [46, 47]. BT474-TFF3 cells also displayed higher cSRC activation (phosphorylation of Y416) as compared to BT474-VEC cells (Supplementary Figure 3B), consistent with published literature [31]. Furthermore, STAT3 and p65 (subunit of NFκB), which are activated downstream of HER2, exhibited increased activation (phosphorylation) with forced expression of TFF3 (Supplementary Figure 3C), again in accordance with previous reports [31, 32, 48–50]. HER2 has been reported to promote cell cycle progression and enhance cell survival through the modulation of cell cycle and apoptosis regulators [51, 52]. The level of p27^Kip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor reported to be downregulated by HER2 [53, 54], was lower in BT474-TFF3 cells compared to BT474-VEC cells (Supplementary Figure 3D). Furthermore, the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 known to be upregulated by HER2 [55–57], increased its expression in BT474-TFF3 cells as compared to BT474-VEC cells (Supplementary Figure 3D), consistent with a previous study [29].

Conversely, the siRNA mediated depletion of TFF3 decreased the phosphorylation of HER1-4 and the downstream p44/42 MAPK (Supplementary Figure 3E). The effect of TFF3 inhibition on HER signalling was also determined using a novel small molecule TFF3 inhibitor AMPC developed in our laboratory (manuscript in preparation). AMPC treatment decreased TFF3 protein levels in a dose-dependent manner in BT474 cells, with a significant reduction of TFF3 levels at an AMPC concentration of 10 µM and higher (Figure 2B). In contrast to the effect of forced expression of TFF3, the inhibition of TFF3 by AMPC decreased HER1-4 phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2B). The phosphorylation of downstream AKT and p44/42 MAPK decreased proportionately with the inhibition of TFF3 at increasing AMPC concentrations (Figure 2B). Consistent with increased total EGFR and p44/42 MAPK levels with forced expression of TFF3, they were, however, decreased with AMPC inhibition of TFF3 (Figure 2B).

TFF3 was shown herein to be transcriptionally downregulated by HER2 activation and upregulated by trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 in BT474 cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that TFF3 mediated the activation of HER2 signalling in BT474 cells. Taken together, it is proposed that HER2 regulates its own signalling in a negative feedback loop through transcriptional repression of TFF3 in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells (Figure 2C). Activated HER2 decreases TFF3 levels, which in turn reduces TFF3-mediated HER2 activation. In contrast, trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 releases the repression on TFF3 expression to partially negate the loss of HER2 signalling (Figure 2D).

TFF3 increases the 3D growth of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells in the presence of trastuzumab

As we observed that TFF3 expression is HER2-regulated and activates HER signalling, we went on to determine whether TFF3 modulates trastuzumab response in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture is increasingly recognized as an attractive system for the study of drug response since it is more physiologically relevant, and thus is more predictive of in vivo functionality [58]. We hence investigated the effect of TFF3 forced expression on the trastuzumab response of BT474 cells in 3D Matrigel growth assays. Forced expression of TFF3 significantly increased the basal capacity for 3D Matrigel growth of BT474 cells (Figure 3A). In the presence of low trastuzumab concentrations of 1 and 5 µg/ml, BT474-TFF3 cells maintained significantly higher 3D Matrigel growth than BT474-VEC cells (Figure 3A). However, this growth advantage of BT474-TFF3 cells was abrogated in the presence of 10 µg/ml trastuzumab (Figure 3A).

(A) BT474-VEC and -TFF3 cells were cultured in 5% FBS media containing 4% Matrigel and treated with the indicated concentrations of trastuzumab over a period of 8 to 10 days. Cell viability in 3D Matrigel was measured by AlamarBlue assay. (B) BT474 cells were cultured in 5% FBS media containing 4% Matrigel, and treated with AMPC (IC₅₀ ≈ 2 µM in BT474 cells under 3D growth condition) ± 10 µg/ml trastuzumab over a period of 8 to 10 days. Cell viability in 3D Matrigel was measured by AlamarBlue assay. (C) MDA-MB-361 cells were cultured in 10% FBS media containing 4% Matrigel, and treated with AMPC (IC₅₀ ≈ 5 µM in MDA-MB-361 cells under 3D growth condition) ± 10 µg/ml trastuzumab over a period of 8 to 10 days. Cell viability in 3D Matrigel was measured by AlamarBlue assay. Tras: trastuzumab; Vehicle: DMSO solvent for AMPC. Scale bar: 200 µm. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; NS, no significance.

We further examined the effect of siRNA-mediated TFF3 depletion or TFF3 inhibition on trastuzumab response in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells using 3D Matrigel growth assays. The decrease in TFF3 mRNA (Supplementary Figure 4A) and protein (Supplementary Figure 4B) levels upon siRNA-mediated depletion of TFF3 in BT474 cells was verified. Alternatively, BT474 and MDA-MB-361 cells were treated with the TFF3 inhibitor AMPC at approximate IC₅₀ concentrations. The IC₅₀ values of AMPC were determined to be 1.206 ± 0.3822 µM in BT474 cells; and 3.672 ± 0.5883 µM in MDA-MB-361 cells using 3D Matrigel growth conditions. siRNA-mediated depletion or AMPC inhibition of TFF3 significantly reduced the basal capacity for 3D Matrigel growth of BT474 cells (Supplementary Figure 4C and Figure 3B). The AMPC inhibition of TFF3 further significantly decreased the 3D Matrigel growth of trastuzumab-treated BT474 cells (Figure 3B), although the depletion of TFF3 did not further inhibit the 3D Matrigel growth of the trastuzumab-treated BT474 cells when compared to trastuzumab treatment alone (Supplementary Figure 4C). Similarly, the AMPC inhibition of TFF3 significantly decreased the 3D Matrigel growth of MDA-MB-361 cells, in addition to the inhibitory effect of trastuzumab (Figure 3C).

We have previously demonstrated that the siRNA mediated depletion or antibody inhibition of TFF3 decreased the soft agar colony formation and 3D matrigel growth of ER+ MCF7 cells treated with tamoxifen or fulvestrant [29]. As tamoxifen and trastuzumab were shown to exhibit a synergistic effect in inhibiting the growth of BT474 cells [59], we further examined the effect of AMPC inhibition of TFF3 in modulating response towards the combination of trastuzumab and tamoxifen in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. The combination of trastuzumab and tamoxifen treatment markedly decreased the 3D matrigel growth of the HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells, while the AMPC inhibition of TFF3 could further decrease the 3D matrigel growth of these treated cells (Supplementary Figure 4D and 4E).

TFF3 expression is markedly increased in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells

To determine whether TFF3 mediates acquired trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer, trastuzumab resistant BT474 and MDA-MB-361 cells were generated (Figures 4A and 5A) [60]. TFF3 mRNA and protein levels were markedly higher in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells as compared to control BT474 cells (Figure 4B and 4C). In comparison with BT474 cells, MDA-MB-361 cells exhibited lower basal sensitivity towards trastuzumab (Figures 4A and 5A). The trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells also exhibited upregulation of TFF3 mRNA and protein levels as compared to control MDA-MB-361 cells, albeit at a lower level (Figure 5B and 5C).

(A) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of trastuzumab in media supplemented with 5% FBS over a period of 6 days. Cell viability was measured by AlamarBlue assay. TFF3 (B) mRNA and (C) protein levels in control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were determined by qPCR and western blot with β-ACTIN as input control. (D) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were treated with DMSO vehicle or 20 µM AMPC for 24 hours in media supplemented with 5% FBS. The levels of phosphorylated and total HER receptors and downstream signalling mediators in the control and trastuzumab resistant cells were analysed using western blot. β-ACTIN was used as input control. The densitometric analyses of protein bands were performed using ImageJ. Ctrl or C: control cells; Tras Res or TR: trastuzumab resistant cells; Tras: trastuzumab; Vehicle: DMSO solvent for AMPC. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; NS, no significance.

(A) Control and trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of trastuzumab in media supplemented with 10% FBS over a period of 6 days. Cell viability was measured by AlamarBlue assay. TFF3 (B) mRNA and (C) protein levels in control and trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells were determined by qPCR and western blot with β-ACTIN as input control. (D) Control and trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells were treated with DMSO vehicle or 20 µM AMPC for 24 hours in media supplemented with 10% FBS. The levels of phosphorylated and total HER receptors and downstream signalling mediators in the control and trastuzumab resistant cells were analysed using western blot. β-ACTIN was used as input control. The densitometric analyses of protein bands were performed using ImageJ. Ctrl or C: control cells; Tras Res or TR: trastuzumab resistant cells; Tras: trastuzumab; Vehicle: DMSO solvent for AMPC. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; NS, no significance.

Next, we determined HER signalling status, and the interaction between TFF3 and HER signalling in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. The trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells expressed lower levels of the HER family receptors (EGFR, HER2 and HER3) as compared to control BT474 cells (Figure 4D). The levels of HER1-4 phosphorylation were also greatly reduced in the trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, with a concordant decrease in activation of downstream AKT and p44/42 MAPK pathways (Figure 4D). The inhibition of TFF3 by AMPC eliminated the remaining low level of HER signalling activity in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, as indicated by a further decrease in phosphorylation of the HER family of receptors, and the downstream AKT and p44/42 MAPK (Figure 4D). The same trend of reduced HER1-4 levels and signalling activity was observed in trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells as compared to control cells (Figure 5D). Furthermore, AMPC inhibition of TFF3 similarly decreased HER signalling in control MDA-MB-361 cells, and further reduced the low levels of HER signalling in trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells (Figure 5D).

Depletion of TFF3 abrogates the growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells without re-sensitization to trastuzumab

In order to confirm the functional roles of TFF3 in acquired trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells, we depleted endogenous TFF3 in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells with siRNA against TFF3. The level of TFF3 protein in control BT474 cells transfected with the TFF3 siRNA (siTFF3) was markedly reduced as compared to that in control BT474 cells transfected with the scrambled siRNA (siSC) (Figure 6A). However, the knockdown was less efficient in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, even when a higher concentration of siRNA (50 nM) was used for transfection (Figure 6A). This is attributed to the marked upregulation of TFF3 expression in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, and the observed resistance of these cells to transfection with trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells exhibiting a thousand times lower transfection efficiency than control BT474 cells as measured by Renilla luciferase activity.

(A) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated concentrations of scrambled or TFF3 siRNA. TFF3 protein levels were measured with β-ACTIN as input control. (B) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells transfected with either scrambled or TFF3 siRNA were cultured in 5% FBS media containing 4% matrigel, and treated with 10 µg/ml trastuzumab over a period of 8 to 10 days. Cell viability in 3D Matrigel was measured by AlamarBlue assay. Ctrl: control cells; Tras Res: trastuzumab resistant cells. Scale bar, 200 µm. *p < 0.05; NS, no significance.

The basal capacity for 3D Matrigel growth of trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells was markedly increased as compared to control BT474 cells (Figure 6B). The depletion of TFF3 significantly reduced the basal capacities for 3D Matrigel growth of both control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells (Figure 6B). In particular, the siRNA-mediated depletion of TFF3 completely abrogated the growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells in the 3D Matrigel growth assay without an additional inhibitory effect from trastuzumab (Figure 6B). Similarly, the depletion of TFF3 significantly decreased the 3D Matrigel growth of trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells to the levels of the control MDA-MB-361 cells both in the absence and presence of trastuzumab (Supplementary Figure 5A).

Inhibition of TFF3 abrogates the survival and growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells without re-sensitization to trastuzumab

The effect of AMPC inhibition of TFF3 on acquired trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells was also investigated. AMPC treatment decreased TFF3 protein levels in control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells (Figure 7A). A higher concentration of AMPC (20 μM) was required to produce a significant decrease in TFF3 protein in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, which showed a markedly higher TFF3 expression than in control BT474 cells (Figure 7A).

(A) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were treated with 10 µM and 20 µM of AMPC for 24 hours in media supplemented with 5% FBS. TFF3 protein levels were measured with β-ACTIN as input control. Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of AMPC ± 10 µg/ml trastuzumab in media supplemented with 5% FBS. (B) Cell viability was measured by AlamarBlue assay after 6 days. (C) Caspase 3/7 activity was determined after 24 hours. (D) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were cultured in 5% FBS media containing 4% matrigel, and treated with the indicated concentrations of AMPC ± 10 µg/ml trastuzumab, over a period of 8 to 10 days. Cell viability in 3D Matrigel was measured by AlamarBlue assay. The statistical significance in cell viability differences between the AMPC treated cells as compared to vehicle treated cells is represented by the * symbol, while that between the trastuzumab treated as compared to untreated cells is represented by the # symbol. C or Ctrl: control cells; TR or Tras Res: trastuzumab resistant cells; Vehicle: DMSO solvent for AMPC. Scale bar, 200 µm. *p < 0.05; ** or ^##p < 0.01; *** or ^###p < 0.001; NS, no significance.

Similar to depletion of TFF3, AMPC inhibition of TFF3 significantly reduced the basal monolayer cell viability of control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 7B). AMPC at a concentration of 10 μM decreased the monolayer cell viability of control BT474 cells in addition to trastuzumab inhibition, while a higher concentration of AMPC (20 μM) was sufficient to markedly reduce the monolayer cell viability of control BT474 cells without an additional inhibitory effect from trastuzumab (Figure 7B). The trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells with elevated TFF3 expression required a higher concentration of AMPC (20 μM) for a significant reduction of monolayer cell viability in the presence of trastuzumab (Figure 7B). AMPC treatment decreased the monolayer cell viability of trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells without re-sensitizing them to trastuzumab (Figure 7B). Likewise, AMPC treatment also reduced the monolayer cell viabilities of control and trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells, without an additional inhibitory effect from trastuzumab (Supplementary Figure 5B). The inhibition of TFF3 by AMPC reduced the monolayer cell viability of control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells by promotion of apoptosis. AMPC treatment significantly increased caspase 3/7 activities of control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, with the trastuzumab resistant cells requiring a higher concentration of AMPC (20 μM) to stimulate a significant increase in apoptosis (Figure 7C). In addition, the inhibition of TFF3 by AMPC significantly reduced the capacity for 3D Matrigel growth of control BT474 cells and abrogated the 3D growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, without an additional inhibitory effect from trastuzumab (Figure 7D). Similar results upon AMPC treatment were observed in control and trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells (Supplementary Figure 5C).

Inhibition of TFF3 abrogates the increased cancer stem cell (CSC)-like behaviour in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells

It has previously been reported that increased CSC like behaviour plays a key role in acquired trastuzumab resistance [60, 61]. Hence, we also examined whether TFF3 modulates the CSC-like population in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. The mammosphere-forming capacity was greatly enhanced in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells as compared to that in control BT474 cells, as indicated by the greater number and size of viable mammospheres formed by the former under DMSO vehicle treatment (Figure 8A). However, upon inhibition of TFF3 by AMPC, the mammosphere-forming capacities of both control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were greatly reduced (Figure 8A). In particular, the higher mammosphere-forming capacity of the trastuzumab resistant cells was abrogated.

(A) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were seeded in ultra-low attachment plates in mammospheric growth media, and treated with the indicated concentrations of AMPC. After 10 days, mammospheric growth was measured by AlamarBlue. Representative images of mammospheres generated were shown. Scale bar, 200 µm. (B) Control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells were treated with trastuzumab or AMPC or their combination in media supplemented with 5% FBS for 4 days. The cells were then harvested and incubated with ALDEFLUOR substrate (BAAA, BODIPY^®-aminoacetaldehyde) to define the ALDH1-positive population. A specific inhibitor of ALDH1, diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), was used to establish the baseline fluorescence. Flow cytometry plots indicate side scatter (SSC) versus fluorescence intensity. Ctrl: control cells; Tras Res: trastuzumab resistant cells; Vehicle: DMSO solvent for AMPC. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

ALDEFLUOR^™ assay is often used to detect cells that express the cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 (ALDH1). This assay was also performed to study the effect of AMPC on cancer stem cell-like behaviour in control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells. The trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells exhibited a markedly higher ALDH1-positive population than control BT474 cells (Figure 8B). Trastuzumab or AMPC treatment alone significantly decreased the ALDH1-positive population in both control and trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells (Figure 8B). Furthermore, the combination of trastuzumab and AMPC acted synergistically to effectively eliminate the ALDH1-positive population in control BT474 cells and abrogated the elevated ALDH1-positive population in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells (Figure 8B). Therefore, besides inhibiting survival and growth, AMPC treatment also depleted the cancer stem cell-like population in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells. AMPC is hence useful in targeting both the bulk population of non-stem cancer cells and the increased cancer stem cell population in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells with acquired trastuzumab resistance.

DISCUSSION

HER2+/ER+ breast cancer is characterized by HER2-ERα signalling crosstalk, and is prone to resistance towards both anti-estrogen and HER2-targeted therapies [6, 8]. As TFF3 is an estrogen-responsive oncogene [33, 62], our study builds on the existing HER2-ERα crosstalk and established the cross-regulation between HER2 and TFF3 in an ERα-independent manner. Previously, the cross-regulation between ERα and TFF3 has implicated TFF3 in anti-estrogen resistance [29]. In this study, we showed that the cross-regulation between HER2 and TFF3 identifies TFF3 as a mediator of trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer.

Herein, we demonstrated that TFF3 is transcriptionally downregulated by HER2 activation and upregulated by trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. Previously, we observed TFF3 expression to be associated with low HER2 levels in a mammary carcinoma patient cohort, although the difference was not statistically significant [31]. Furthermore, previous studies have reported a negative correlation of TFF3 level and HER2 status, in which TFF3 was found to be more frequently expressed in gastric tumours without HER2 amplification as compared to those with HER2 amplification [63, 64]. Our current findings are consistent with these observations in that HER2 transcriptionally represses TFF3, while trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 releases the transcriptional repression on TFF3 in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. In contrast to our findings of trastuzumab-stimulated upregulation of TFF3 in BT474 cells, Yue et al. observed that the silencing of HER2 induced TFF3 downregulation in HER2+/ER− SKBR3 cells [65]. This discrepancy may be attributed to two reasons. Firstly, the mechanisms of HER2 transcriptional regulation of TFF3 in different breast cancer subtypes are probably varied. We found that TFF3 is negatively regulated by HER2 and is employed by HER2 to maintain the appropriate level of HER signalling in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. However, in HER2+/ER− SKBR3 cells that express relatively low levels of TFF3, it is possible that HER2 may not depend on transcriptional regulation of TFF3 to regulate its own signalling. Secondly, trastuzumab inhibition of HER2 possibly exerts a distinct effect as compared to endogenous knockdown of HER2 since trastuzumab was previously confirmed to enhance HER2 phosphorylation at specific phosphotyrosine sites in trastuzumab-sensitive breast cancer cells [66–68]. It will be necessary to determine whether decreased HER2 levels and signalling can transcriptionally activate TFF3 in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells in general or whether this is a trastuzumab-dependent effect. Specifically, the effect of siRNA-mediated knockdown or lapatinib inhibition of HER2 on TFF3 expression in BT474 and MDA-MB-361 cells can be examined. NFκB is activated by HER2 and is known as a negative transcriptional regulator of TFF3, making it a potential mediator of HER2-regulated TFF3 repression [69–71]. It has been demonstrated that the NFκB binding site at position −97 of the TFF3 promoter is essential for the transcriptional downregulation of TFF3 by NFκB [69].

TFF3 has previously been reported to induce tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of EGFR and HER2 in a colonic epithelial cell line (HT-29), gastric cancer cell line (AGS) and oral keratinocytes [72, 73]. Furthermore, TFF3 has been shown to activate cSRC in MCF7 breast cancer cells, which could in turn mediate EGFR phosphorylation [31, 74]. Although TFF3-mediated activation of HER3 and HER4 have not been reported, these receptors can dimerize with EGFR and HER2 and be activated [36]. As such, our study demonstrated that the forced expression of TFF3 increased, while the depletion or inhibition of TFF3 decreased, phosphorylation of the HER family of receptors in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. Despite studies showing TFF3-stimulated EGFR activation, all attempts have failed to demonstrate direct binding and co-localisation of TFF3 and EGFR [75, 76]. A possible mechanism through which TFF3 activates HER2 is transactivation by crosstalk pathways including cSRC since TFF3 was previously shown to activate cSRC, a known crosstalk partner of HER2 [31, 77, 78]. There is also substantial evidence that TFF3 activates downstream AKT and p44/42 MAPK pathways [72, 73, 79–82]. Consistent with published literature, TFF3 has been demonstrated to increase phosphorylation of AKT and p44/42 MAPK in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells in this study. Besides the activation of HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases, it was demonstrated that TFF3 activates HER family crosstalk partners including cMET and IGF1R. cMET is a receptor tyrosine kinase, which is implicated in enhanced cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis of tumour cells [83]. IGF1R is another transmembrane tyrosine kinase that is critical for cell proliferation, growth, survival and motility [84]. The capacity of TFF3 to activate cMET and IGF1R as newly discovered mechanisms of TFF3 signalling further unveils the importance of TFF3 as a therapeutic target. In addition, our observation of TFF3-mediated activation of cSRC, STAT3 and p65 (subunit of NFκB) in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells is consistent with published literature [31, 32, 48–50].

As a result of the cross-regulation between TFF3 and HER2, we observed that TFF3 partially decreased trastuzumab response in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. Both TFF3 and trastuzumab regulate HER2 activity, albeit in opposing directions. Forced expression of TFF3 in BT474 cells increased HER2 signalling that is in turn inhibited by trastuzumab. This accounts for the observation that TFF3 forced expression only decreased the inhibitory effect of trastuzumab at low concentrations (≤ 5 µg/ml). The TFF3-mediated HER2 signalling was insufficiently inhibited at these low trastuzumab concentrations, resulting in higher 3D growth of BT474-TFF3 cells as compared to BT474-VEC cells. In contrast, a higher concentration of trastuzumab (10 µg/ml) could inhibit TFF3-mediated HER2 signalling and decrease the 3D growth of BT474-TFF3 cells to the same level as that of BT474-VEC cells. Conversely, the inhibition of TFF3, along with trastuzumab, decreased HER2 activity to achieve a greater HER2 inhibitory effect. Nevertheless, TFF3 depletion or inhibition only moderately reduced the survival and growth of the HER2+/ER+ cells in the presence of trastuzumab as TFF3 activates HER pathway, the same pathway that trastuzumab targets.

In our model of acquired trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer, the expression of HER2 and other members of the HER family was markedly downregulated, while TFF3 was highly upregulated. The decrease or loss of HER2 following trastuzumab treatment has previously been reported in a subset of patients in the clinical settings, where HER2 status was evaluated in paired pre-treatment and post-treatment breast tumours using either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) [85–89]. Moreover, loss of HER2 amplification was observed to be associated with a poorer relapse free survival (RFS) of the trastuzumab-treated breast cancer patients in a median follow-up study [88]. Our results are consistent a previous study, whereby BT474 cells with acquired resistance to trastuzumab lost both HER2 amplification and over-expression [88]. Therefore, our findings, along with available clinical evidence, suggest that it may be useful to re-assess HER2 status in recurrent disease and that not all patients will necessarily benefit from the one-year course of adjuvant trastuzumab [88]. Nevertheless, as described above, not all HER2+ breast cancer that progresses on trastuzumab lose HER2 dependence [85, 87–89]. Furthermore, other studies have reported the maintenance or upregulation of HER signalling in acquired trastuzumab resistance [90, 91]. Herein, we observed that the trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells displayed a shift in oncogene addiction away from HER2 to TFF3 with highly upregulated TFF3 expression and downregulated HER signalling. In a neoadjuvant paclitaxel, trastuzumab, carboplatin combination (PTC) trial (GSE41656), TFF3 gene expression was observed to be significantly higher in non-complete responders (non-CR) of the combination of trastuzumab and chemotherapy treatment as compared to complete responders (CR) among both HER2+/ER+ and HER2+/ER- breast cancer patients (Supplementary Figure 6). To date, no clinical study has evaluated the expression of TFF3 in HER2+/ER+ breast cancers which have progressed on trastuzumab. Notably, it can be determined if there exists a clinical correlation between the loss of HER2 and increased TFF3 expression in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer. The loss of HER2 and upregulation of TFF3 may serve as potential biomarkers to select for trastuzumab-refractory HER2+/ER+ breast cancer patients who may benefit from therapeutic inhibition of TFF3.

Collectively, our results suggest that TFF3 functionally mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. The shift in oncogene addiction from HER2 to TFF3 provides justification for the use of TFF3 inhibition to overcome trastuzumab resistance. At a higher concentration, AMPC was able to abrogate the survival and growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells to a level similar to that of control cells. In addition, we observed that the high level of TFF3 in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells maintains the activity of the remaining HER receptors, concordant with our finding that TFF3 activates HER signalling. Hence, AMPC inhibition of TFF3 has the added advantage of abrogating the remaining low level of HER signalling in the trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells such that eradication of these resistant cells did not require re-sensitization to trastuzumab. Trastuzumab tends to show higher efficacy in vivo, the effect being attributed to the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) response [92]. It has been previously reported that trastuzumab resistant breast cancer cells in vitro, which retained HER2 expression, remained sensitive to trastuzumab in vivo through trastuzumab-mediated ADCC [93]. However, the marked downregulation of HER2 in our trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells implies that the resistant cells would probably remain relatively insensitive to trastuzumab in vivo due to the failure of ADCC. Nevertheless, trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells, which have lost HER2 expression but exhibited upregulated TFF3, could potentially be targeted by TFF3 inhibition in vivo. This further reinforces the importance of therapeutic TFF3 inhibition, which can eradicate the trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells alone without the need for trastuzumab re-sensitization.

Lastly, increasing evidence has shown that trastuzumab resistance is associated with increased breast CSC population [60, 61]. Consistently, our study also demonstrated a marked increase in CSC-like behaviour, as characterized by an increase in mammosphere-forming capacity and increased ALDH1-positive population in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells. We have previously shown that TFF3 is responsible for the increased CSC-like population in HCC cells with acquired chemoresistance [23]. Herein, we have provided further evidence of the role of TFF3 in promoting CSC-like behaviour in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer. Furthermore, we observed decreased cancer stem cell-like population in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells with trastuzumab treatment, which is consistent with published literatures [94]. Although trastuzumab treatment did not produce additional survival and growth inhibitory effects on AMPC-treated trastuzumab resistant cells, it was observed that trastuzumab and AMPC act synergistically to decrease the CSC-like population in the trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells. It remains to be determined whether unlike the bulk population of differentiated cancer cells that lost HER2, the CSC-like population retains high HER2 expression, rendering them to be more responsive to trastuzumab [95].

In summary, we revealed a novel mechanism of bidirectional cross-regulation between HER2 and TFF3, which is at least partially ERα-independent. Furthermore, we showed that TFF3 mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer with decreased HER2 expression and signalling. A novel small molecule TFF3 inhibitor eradicated the trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells, without the need for trastuzumab re-sensitization. Hence, we propose TFF3 as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture, transfection and trastuzumab resistant cells generation

The human HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cell lines, BT474 and MDA-MB-361, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and were cultured in conditions as recommended. BT474 cells with forced expression of TFF3 were generated by transfection with empty pIRESneo3 vector or pIRESneo3-TFF3 plasmid as previously described [29]. After 4 weeks of selection in medium containing 800 μg/ml G418, the stably transfected cells were designated as BT474–VEC and BT474–TFF3 cells respectively. The siRNA oligos, namely Silencer^® Select Negative Control No. 1 siRNA and Silencer^® Select TFF3 siRNA (s277470 and s14041), were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). BT474 cells with transient depletion of TFF3 were generated by transfection of the cells with TFF3 siRNA, or scrambled siRNA as a negative control, using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the recommended protocol. The transiently transfected cells were designated as BT474-siSC and BT474-siTFF3 cells respectively. The trastuzumab resistant BT474 and MDA-MB-361 cells were generated as previously described [60]. The parental cell lines were constantly treated with 10 μg/ml trastuzumab for a period of six months until significant trastuzumab resistance was observed in the cell viability assay. Control cells were maintained alongside with normal media.

Reagents

Trastuzumab (Herceptin) was kindly provided by Dr Wang Lingzhi from the National University Hospital (NUH), Singapore. Epidermal growth factor (EGF), 17β-estradiol, tamoxifen and bovine insulin were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Heregulin was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). B27 supplement and basic FGF (bFGF) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).

Luciferase reporter assay

The estrogen response element (ERE) luciferase reporter plasmid (pGL2-ERE) used was previously described [29]. The TFF3 promoter luciferase reporter plasmid used consists of the human TFF3 promoter (−702 to +63) cloned into pGL3-basic vector. To generate the estrogen-depleted experimental condition, the cells were grown in phenol red-free media supplemented with charcoal-stripped FBS for 4 days before experiments. Luciferase assays were performed using the Dual-Luciferase^® Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI) as previously described [31]. Briefly, the pGL3-ERE or pGL3-TFF3 promoter luciferase reporter plasmid was co-transfected with pRL Renilla luciferase control reporter vector into the cells. 24 hours following transfection, the cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of EGF, HRG or trastuzumab in the absence or presence of 100 nM 17β-estradiol or 1 μM tamoxifen in phenol red-free media containing full charcoal stripped-serum for the respective time points before luciferase activities were assayed.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis

qPCR was performed as described earlier [29]. The primers used for qPCR were as follows: TFF3 forward 5′-CTTGCTGTCCTCCAGCTCT-3′, TFF3 reverse 5′- CCGGTTGTTGCACTCCTT-3′, β-Actin forward 5′- GCACTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTT-3′ and β-Actin reverse 5′- GCACTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTT-3′.

Western blot analysis/immunoblotting

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and proteins in the cell lysate were resolved using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [29]. The primary antibodies used are as follows: phospho-AKT1 S473 (Abcam ab66138) [96], pan-AKT (Abcam ab8805) [97], β-Actin (Santa Cruz sc-47778), BCL-2 (Santa Cruz sc-509), phospho-cMET Y1234/1235 (Cell Signaling 3077S), cMET (Cell Signaling 8198S), phospho-cSRC Y416 (Santa Cruz sc-101802), cSRC (Santa Cruz sc-8056), phospho-EGFR Y1068 (Cell Signaling 3777S) [98], EGFR (Abcam ab2430) [99], phospho-p44/42 MAPK T202/Y204 (Cell Signaling 4370S) [100], p44/42 MAPK (Cell Signaling 4695S) [101], phospho-HER2/neu Y1248 (Santa Cruz sc-12352-R) [60], HER2/neu (Abcam ab2428) [102], phospho-HER3 Y1289 (Cell Signaling 4791S) [98], HER3 (Santa Cruz sc-415) [103], phospho-HER4 Y1284 (Cell Signaling 4757S) [104], HER4 (Santa Cruz sc-8050) [105], phospho-IGF1Rβ Y1135/1136 (Cell Signaling 3024S), IGF1Rβ (Cell Signaling 9750S), p27^kip1 (Cell Signaling 3686S), phospho-p65 S536 (Cell Signaling 3033S), p65 (Cell Signaling 4764S), phospho-STAT3 Y705 (Cell Signaling 9131S), STAT3 (Cell Signaling 9139S), and TFF3 (Abcam ab108599) [25]. The secondary anti-rabbit, anti-mouse and anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology.

Cell function assays

The monolayer cell viability, apoptosis and three-dimensional (3D) Matrigel growth assays were performed as previously described [29]. The cell function assays with trastuzumab treatment were carried out in reduced serum media as previously described [106, 107]. In the monolayer cell viability assay, cells were seeded at 5000 cells per well and treated with respective drugs in reduced serum media for 6 days. Cell viability was measured using AlamarBlue assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Apoptotic cell death was measured 24 hours after drug treatment using the Caspase-Glo^® 3/7 Assay kit (Promega Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In the 3D Matrigel growth assay, cells were seeded at 1000 cells per well in media supplemented with 5% FBS and 4% Matrigel onto the solidified Matrigel base. The seeded cells were allowed to grow into 3D colonies in the Matrigel for 4 days before respective treatments were added. The number and sizes of the colonies were visualized under the microscope, and the viability of the colonies was determined using the AlamarBlue assay after 8–10 days.

Cancer stem cell (CSC) assay

The mammosphere formation and ALDEFLUOR assays were performed as described previously [60]. In the mammosphere formation assay, single cells were grown in CSC growth media, which consists of serum-free DMEM/F12 1:1 media supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin, 10 ng/ml recombinant human basic FGF, 20 ng/ml recombinant human EGF, 2% B27 and 5 μg/ml bovine insulin, at a density of 500 cells per well in ultra-low attachment 96-well plate. Mammosphere formation was observed after 7–10 days and mammospheres of greater than 60 µm were counted under the microscope. The viability of the mammospheres was determined using the AlamarBlue assay.

The ALDEFLUOR assay was performed using the ALDEFLUOR assay kit (STEMCELL Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were treated with respective drugs for 4 days in reduced serum media. The resulting harvested cells were incubated with ALDEFLUOR substrate (BAAA, BODIPY^®-aminoacetaldehyde) to define the ALDH1 positive population, while a specific inhibitor of ALDH1, diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), was used to establish the baseline fluorescence.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA) was used to generate graphical presentations and for statistical analysis. All experiments were performed at least three times and numerical data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from a representative experiment performed in triplicate. Statistical significance was assessed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test with p < 0.05 being considered as statistically significant.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES

oncotarget-08-74188-s001.pdf^{(3.1MB, pdf)}

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Wang Lingzhi for providing us with Trastuzumab (Herceptin). We also thank Dr Tan Tuan Zea for his help in analysing the clinical databases.

Authors’ contributions

PEL designed the research, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. QYC designed the research, performed the experiments analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. MLY, VP, AB, YJC, MYZ, TZ, LM, B and LL designed the research. HMP performed the experiments. MLY, VP and AB analysed the data.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

PEL and TZ have previously consulted for Perseis Therapeutics Ltd. PEL is also named on PCT application numbers WO/2006/69253, WO/2008/042435, WO/2009/147530 and WO/2012/150869 and derivatives/national phase components of these applications thereof. VP, B and PEL will be named as inventors on a provisional patent application for inhibition of TFF3 by small molecules. QYC, MLY, AB, YJC, HMP, MZ, LM and LL declare no conflicts of interest.

GRANT SUPPORT

This work was funded by The National Key Scientific Programme of China (2016YFC1302305), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502282, 81472494, 81272925), the Cancer Science Institute through grants from The Ministry of Education, Singapore and National Research Foundation, Singapore and by grants from the National Medical Research Council of Singapore [R-713-000-163-511] and [R-713-000-206-511]. PEL was also supported by The Chinese Academy of Sciences President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI) Grant No. 2015VBA031.

REFERENCES

1.Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, Chen VW, Clarke CA, Ries LA, Cronin KA. US Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Joint Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106 doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Parise CA, Caggiano V. Breast Cancer Survival Defined by the ER/PR/HER2 Subtypes and a Surrogate Classification according to Tumor Grade and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:469251. doi: 10.1155/2014/469251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Mariani G, Fasolo A, De Benedictis E, Gianni L. Trastuzumab as adjuvant systemic therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2009;6:93–104. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Cortes J, Saura C, Bellet M, Munoz-Couselo E, Ramirez-Merino N, Calvo V, Perez J, Vidal M. HER2 and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer–blocking the right target. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:307–311. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Montemurro F, Di Cosimo S, Arpino G. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2715–2724. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Prat A, Baselga J. The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5:531–542. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Wu VS, Kanaya N, Lo C, Mortimer J, Chen S. From bench to bedside: what do we know about hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;153:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Huober J, Fasching PA, Barsoum M, Petruzelka L, Wallwiener D, Thomssen C, Reimer T, Paepke S, Azim HA, Ragosch V, Kubista E, Baumgärtner AK, Beckmann MW, et al. Higher efficacy of letrozole in combination with trastuzumab compared to letrozole monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer - results of the eLEcTRA trial. Breast. 2012;21:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, Bapsy PP, Vaid A, Wardley A, Tjulandin S, Jahn M, Lehle M, Feyereislova A, Révil C, Jones A. Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5529–37. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Schwartzberg LS, Franco SX, Florance A, O’Rourke L, Maltzman J, Johnston S. Lapatinib plus letrozole as first-line therapy for HER-2+ hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:122–29. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Nahta R, O’Regan RM. Therapeutic implications of estrogen receptor signaling in HER2-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:39–48. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Vici P, Pizzuti L, Natoli C, Gamucci T, Di Lauro L, Barba M, Sergi D, Botti C, Michelotti A, Moscetti L, Mariani L, Izzo F, D’Onofrio L, et al. Triple positive breast cancer: a distinct subtype? Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Kjellev S. The trefoil factor family-small peptides with multiple functionalities. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1350–1369. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8646-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Thim L. Trefoil peptides: from structure to function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1997;53:888–903. doi: 10.1007/s000180050108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Taupin DK, Podolsky D. Trefoil factors: initiators of mucosal healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:721. doi: 10.1038/nrm1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Emami S, Rodrigues S, Rodrigue CM, Le Floch N, Rivat C, Attoub S, Bruyneel E, Gespach C. Trefoil factor family (TFF) peptides and cancer progression. Peptides. 2004;25:885–898. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Perry JK, Kannan N, Grandison PM, Mitchell MD, Lobie PE. Are trefoil factors oncogenic? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008;19:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Im S, Yoo C, Jung JH, Choi HJ, Yoo J, Kang CS. Reduced expression of TFF1 and increased expression of TFF3 in gastric cancer: correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:133–140. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Khoury T, Chadha K, Javle M, Donohue K, Levea C, Iyer R, Okada H, Nagase H, Tan D. Expression of intestinal trefoil factor (TFF-3) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;35:171–177. doi: 10.1385/IJGC:35:3:171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Okada H, Kimura M, Tan D, Fujiwara K, Igarashi J, Makuuchi M, Hui AM, Tsurumaru M, Nagase H. Frequent trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) overexpression and promoter hypomethylation in mouse and human hepatocellular carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2005;26:369–377. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Sun Q, Zhang Y, Liu F, Zhao X, Yang X. Identification of candidate biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma through pre-cancerous expression analysis in an HBx transgenic mouse. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:1532–1538. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.10.4683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.You ML, Chen YJ, Chong QY, Wu MM, Pandey V, Chen RM, Liu L, Ma L, Wu ZS, Zhu T, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 mediation of oncogenicity and chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma is AKT-BCL-2 dependent. Oncotarget. 2017;8:39323–44. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16950. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Perera O, Evans A, Pertziger M, MacDonald C, Chen H, Liu DX, Lobie PE, Perry JK. Trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) enhances the oncogenic characteristics of prostate carcinoma cells and reduces sensitivity to ionising radiation. Cancer Lett. 2015;361:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Yuan Z, Chen D, Chen X, Yang H, Wei Y. Overexpression of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) contributes to the malignant progression in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:7. doi: 10.1186/s12935-016-0379-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Qu Y, Yang Y, Ma D, Xiao W. Increased trefoil factor 3 levels in the serum of patients with three major histological subtypes of lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2012;27:1277–1283. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Wang XN, Wang SJ, Pandey V, Chen P, Li Q, Wu ZS, Wu Q, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 as a novel biomarker to distinguish between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Medicine. 2015;94:e860. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Ahmed AR, Griffiths AB, Tilby MT, Westley BR, May FE. TFF3 is a normal breast epithelial protein and is associated with differentiated phenotype in early breast cancer but predisposes to invasion and metastasis in advanced disease. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:904–916. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Kannan N, Kang J, Kong X, Tang J, Perry JK, Mohankumar KM, Miller LD, Liu ET, Mertani HC, Zhu T, Grandison PM, Liu DX, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 is oncogenic and mediates anti-estrogen resistance in human mammary carcinoma. Neoplasia. 2010;12:1041–1053. doi: 10.1593/neo.10916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Pandey V, Zhang M, You M, Zhu T, Xu XQ, Lobie PE. OR25–6: Expression of Two Genetic Elements Is Sufficient to Stimulate Oncogenic Transformation of Human Mammary Epithelial Cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31.Pandey V, Wu ZS, Zhang M, Li R, Zhang J, Zhu T, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 promotes metastatic seeding and predicts poor survival outcome of patients with mammary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:429. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0429-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Lau WH, Pandey V, Kong X, Wang XN, Wu Z, Zhu T, Lobie PE. Trefoil Factor-3 (TFF3) Stimulates De Novo Angiogenesis in Mammary Carcinoma both Directly and Indirectly via IL-8/CXCR2. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.May FE, Westley BR. Expression of human intestinal trefoil factor in malignant cells and its regulation by oestrogen in breast cancer cells. J Pathol. 1997;182:404–413. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199708)182:4<404::AID-PATH875>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Thomsen KG, Lyng MB, Elias D, Vever H, Knoop AS, Lykkesfeldt AE, Laenkholm AV, Ditzel HJ. Gene expression alterations associated with outcome in aromatase inhibitor-treated ER+ early-stage breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154:483–494. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3644-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Giuliano M, Trivedi MV, Schiff R. Bidirectional Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer: Molecular Basis and Clinical Implications. Breast Care (Basel) 2013;8:256–262. doi: 10.1159/000354253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Klapper LN, Glathe S, Vaisman N, Hynes NE, Andrews GC, Sela M, Yarden Y. The ErbB-2/HER2 oncoprotein of human carcinomas may function solely as a shared coreceptor for multiple stroma-derived growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4995–5000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Creighton C, Hilger A, Murthy S, Rae J, Chinnaiyan A, El-Ashry D. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer cells in vitro induces an in vivo molecular phenotype of estrogen receptor alpha-negative human breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3903–3911. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Evans AH, Pancholi S, Farmer I, Thornhill A, Evans DB, Johnston SR, Dowsett M, Martin LA. EGFR/HER2 inhibitor AEE788 increases ER-mediated transcription in HER2/ER-positive breast cancer cells but functions synergistically with endocrine therapy. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1235–1243. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Konecny G, Pauletti G, Pegram M, Untch M, Dandekar S, Aguilar Z, Wilson C, Rong H, Bauerfeind I, Felber M. Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:142–153. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.2.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Oh AS, Lorant LA, Holloway JN, Miller DL, Kern FG, El-Ashry D. Hyperactivation of MAPK induces loss of ERalpha expression in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15:1344–1359. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.8.0678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Sabnis G, Schayowitz A, Goloubeva O, Macedo L, Brodie A. Trastuzumab reverses letrozole resistance and amplifies the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to estrogen. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1416–1428. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Stoica A, Saceda M, Doraiswamy VL, Coleman C, Martin MB. Regulation of estrogen receptor-alpha gene expression by epidermal growth factor. J Endocrinol. 2000;165:371–378. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1650371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Tang CK, Perez C, Grunt T, Waibel C, Cho C, Lupu R. Involvement of heregulin-beta2 in the acquisition of the hormone-independent phenotype of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3350–3358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Xia W, Bacus S, Hegde P, Husain I, Strum J, Liu L, Paulazzo G, Lyass L, Trusk P, Hill J, Harris J, Spector NL. A model of acquired autoresistance to a potent ErbB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a therapeutic strategy to prevent its onset in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7795–7800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602468103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–137. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Nahta R, Yuan LX, Zhang B, Kobayashi R, Esteva FJ. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterodimerization contributes to trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11118–11128. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Tanizaki J, Okamoto I, Sakai K, Nakagawa K. Differential roles of trans-phosphorylated EGFR, HER2, HER3, and RET as heterodimerisation partners of MET in lung cancer with MET amplification. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:807–813. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Chen YH, Lu Y, De Plaen IG, Wang LY, Tan XD. Transcription factor NF-kappaB signals antianoikic function of trefoil factor 3 on intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;274:576–582. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Rivat C, Rodrigues S, Bruyneel E, Pietu G, Robert A, Redeuilh G, Bracke M, Gespach C, Attoub S. Implication of STAT3 signaling in human colonic cancer cells during intestinal trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) — and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated cellular invasion and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2005;65:195–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Zhu YQ, Tan XD. TFF3 modulates NF-{kappa}B and a novel negative regulatory molecule of NF-{kappa}B in intestinal epithelial cells via a mechanism distinct from TNF-{alpha} Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;289:C1085–1093. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00185.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Carpenter RL, Lo HW. Regulation of Apoptosis by HER2 in Breast Cancer. J Carcinog Mutagen. 2013;2013:S7. doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.S7-003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Lane HA, Beuvink I, Motoyama AB, Daly JM, Neve RM, Hynes NE. ErbB2 potentiates breast tumor proliferation through modulation of p27(Kip1)-Cdk2 complex formation: receptor overexpression does not determine growth dependency. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:3210–3223. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.9.3210-3223.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Yakes FM, Chinratanalab W, Ritter CA, King W, Seelig S, Arteaga CL. Herceptin-induced inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and Akt Is required for antibody-mediated effects on p27, cyclin D1, and antitumor action. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4132–4141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Yang HY, Zhou BP, Hung MC, Lee MH. Oncogenic signals of HER-2/neu in regulating the stability of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:24735–24739. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000147200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Kumar R, Mandal M, Lipton A, Harvey H, Thompson CB. Overexpression of HER2 modulates bcl-2, bcl-XL, and tamoxifen-induced apoptosis in human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:1215–1219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Milella M, Trisciuoglio D, Bruno T, Ciuffreda L, Mottolese M, Cianciulli A, Cognetti F, Zangemeister-Wittke U, Del Bufalo D, Zupi G. Trastuzumab down-regulates Bcl-2 expression and potentiates apoptosis induction by Bcl-2/Bcl-XL bispecific antisense oligonucleotides in HER-2 gene--amplified breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7747–7756. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Siddiqa A, Long LM, Li L, Marciniak RA, Kazhdan I. Expression of HER-2 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells modulates anti-apoptotic proteins Survivin and Bcl-2 via the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12:207–218. doi: 10.1089/adt.2014.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Argiris A, Wang CX, Whalen SG, DiGiovanna MP. Synergistic interactions between tamoxifen and trastuzumab (Herceptin) Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1409–1420. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1060-02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Ding K, Banerjee A, Tan S, Zhao J, Zhuang Q, Li R, Qian P, Liu S, Wu ZS, Lobie PE, Zhu T. Artemin, a member of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family of ligands, is HER2-regulated and mediates acquired trastuzumab resistance by promoting cancer stem cell-like behavior in mammary carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:16057–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.529552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Korkaya H, Kim GI, Davis A, Malik F, Henry NL, Ithimakin S, Quraishi AA, Tawakkol N, D’Angelo R, Paulson AK, Chung S, Luther T, Paholak HJ, et al. Activation of an IL6 inflammatory loop mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer by expanding the cancer stem cell population. Mol Cell. 2012;47:570–584. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.May FE, Westley BR. TFF3 is a valuable predictive biomarker of endocrine response in metastatic breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:465–479. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Gu J, Zheng L, Zhang L, Chen S, Zhu M, Li X, Wang Y. TFF3 and HER2 expression and their correlation with survival in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:3001–3007. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2933-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Xu CC, Yue L, Wei HJ, Zhao WW, Sui AH, Wang XM, Qiu WS. Significance of TFF3 protein and Her-2/neu status in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209:479–485. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Yue L, Xiang J, Shen Z, Wang Z, Yao Y, Zhou Q, Ding A, Qiu W. Inhibition of ErbB-2 induces TFF3 downregulation in breast cancer cell lines. APMIS. 2014;122:628–635. doi: 10.1111/apm.12203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Dokmanovic M, Wu WJ. Trastuzumab-induced HER2 phosphorylation: exploring the mechanisms and implications. Receptors Clin Investig. 2014;1:e340. [Google Scholar]
67.Dokmanovic M, Wu Y, Shen Y, Chen J, Hirsch DS, Wu WJ. Trastuzumab-induced recruitment of Csk-homologous kinase (CHK) to ErbB2 receptor is associated with ErbB2-Y1248 phosphorylation and ErbB2 degradation to mediate cell growth inhibition. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;15:1029–1041. doi: 10.4161/cbt.29171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Gijsen M, King P, Perera T, Parker PJ, Harris AL, Larijani B, Kong A. HER2 phosphorylation is maintained by a PKB negative feedback loop in response to anti-HER2 herceptin in breast cancer. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Baus-Loncar M, Al-azzeh ED, Romanska H, Lalani el N, Stamp GW, Blin N, Kayademir T. Transcriptional control of TFF3 (intestinal trefoil factor) via promoter binding sites for the nuclear factor kappaB and C/EBPbeta. Peptides. 2004;25:849–854. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Loncar MB, Al-azzeh ED, Sommer PS, Marinovic M, Schmehl K, Kruschewski M, Blin N, Stohwasser R, Gott P, Kayademir T. Tumour necrosis factor alpha and nuclear factor kappaB inhibit transcription of human TFF3 encoding a gastrointestinal healing peptide. Gut. 2003;52:1297–1303. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.9.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Merkhofer EC, Cogswell P, Baldwin AS. Her2 activates NF-kappaB and induces invasion through the canonical pathway involving IKKalpha. Oncogene. 2010;29:1238–1248. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Kinoshita K, Taupin DR, Itoh H, Podolsky DK. Distinct pathways of cell migration and antiapoptotic response to epithelial injury: structure-function analysis of human intestinal trefoil factor. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:4680–4690. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.13.4680-4690.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Storesund T, Schenck K, Osmundsen H, Roed A, Helgeland K, Kolltveit KM. Signal transduction and gene transcription induced by TFF3 in oral keratinocytes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:511–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74.Biscardi JS, Maa MC, Tice DA, Cox ME, Leu TH, Parsons SJ. c-Src-mediated phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor on Tyr845 and Tyr1101 is associated with modulation of receptor function. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:8335–8343. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Hoffmann W. Trefoil factors TFF (trefoil factor family) peptide-triggered signals promoting mucosal restitution. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2932–2938. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5481-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Taupin D, Wu DC, Jeon WK, Devaney K, Wang TC, Podolsky DK. The trefoil gene family are coordinately expressed immediate-early genes: EGF receptor- and MAP kinase-dependent interregulation. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:R31–38. doi: 10.1172/JCI3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Belsches-Jablonski AP, Biscardi JS, Peavy DR, Tice DA, Romney DA, Parsons SJ. Src family kinases and HER2 interactions in human breast cancer cell growth and survival. Oncogene. 2001;20:1465–1475. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Hoffmann W. TFF (trefoil factor family) peptides and their potential roles for differentiation processes during airway remodeling. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:2716–2719. doi: 10.2174/092986707782023226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Lin J, Sun Z, Zhang W, Liu H, Shao D, Ren Y, Wen Y, Cao L, Wolfram J, Yang Z. Protective effects of intestinal trefoil factor (ITF) on gastric mucosal epithelium through activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;404:263–270. doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2386-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Lin N, Xu LF, Sun M. The protective effect of trefoil factor 3 on the intestinal tight junction barrier is mediated by toll-like receptor 2 via a PI3K/Akt dependent mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;440:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Sun Z, Liu H, Yang Z, Shao D, Zhang W, Ren Y, Sun B, Lin J, Xu M, Nie S. Intestinal trefoil factor activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to protect gastric mucosal epithelium from damage. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:1123–1132. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Taupin DR, Kinoshita K, Podolsky DK. Intestinal trefoil factor confers colonic epithelial resistance to apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:799–804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83.Ma P, Maulik G, Christensen J, Salgia R. c-Met: structure, functions and potential for therapeutic inhibition. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:309–325. doi: 10.1023/a:1023768811842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84.Iams WT, Lovly CM. Molecular Pathways: Clinical Applications and Future Direction of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Pathway Blockade. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:4270–4277. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85.Burstein HJ, Harris LN, Gelman R, Lester SC, Nunes RA, Kaelin CM, Parker LM, Ellisen LW, Kuter I, Gadd MA, Christian RL, Kennedy PR, Borges VF, et al. Preoperative therapy with trastuzumab and paclitaxel followed by sequential adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2 overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:46–53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Harris LN, You F, Schnitt SJ, Witkiewicz A, Lu X, Sgroi D, Ryan PD, Come SE, Burstein HJ, Lesnikoski BA, Kamma M, Friedman PN, Gelman R, et al. Predictors of resistance to preoperative trastuzumab and vinorelbine for HER2-positive early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1198–1207. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87.Hurley J, Doliny P, Reis I, Silva O, Gomez-Fernandez C, Velez P, Pauletti G, Powell JE, Pegram MD, Slamon DJ. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1831–1838. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Mittendorf EA, Wu Y, Scaltriti M, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt KK, Dawood S, Esteva FJ, Buzdar AU, Chen H, Eksambi S, Hortobagyi GN, Baselga J, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Loss of HER2 amplification following trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy and survival outcomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7381–7388. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Pectasides D, Gaglia A, Arapantoni-Dadioti P, Bobota A, Valavanis C, Kostopoulou V, Mylonakis N, Karabelis A, Pectasides M, Economopoulos T. HER-2/neu status of primary breast cancer and corresponding metastatic sites in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based therapy. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:647–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90.Ritter CA, Perez-Torres M, Rinehart C, Guix M, Dugger T, Engelman JA, Arteaga CL. Human breast cancer cells selected for resistance to trastuzumab in vivo overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor and ErbB ligands and remain dependent on the ErbB receptor network. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4909–4919. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Wang YC, Morrison G, Gillihan R, Guo J, Ward RM, Fu X, Botero MF, Healy NA, Hilsenbeck SG, Phillips GL, Chamness GC, Rimawi MF, Osborne CK, et al. Different mechanisms for resistance to trastuzumab versus lapatinib in HER2-positive breast cancers–role of estrogen receptor and HER2 reactivation. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R121. doi: 10.1186/bcr3067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Gennari R, Menard S, Fagnoni F, Ponchio L, Scelsi M, Tagliabue E, Castiglioni F, Villani L, Magalotti C, Gibelli N, Oliviero B, Ballardini B, Da Prada G, et al. Pilot study of the mechanism of action of preoperative trastuzumab in patients with primary operable breast tumors overexpressing HER2. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5650–5655. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Kute TE, Savage L, Stehle JR, Jr, Kim-Shapiro JW, Blanks MJ, Wood J, Vaughn JP. Breast tumor cells isolated from in vitro resistance to trastuzumab remain sensitive to trastuzumab anti-tumor effects in vivo and to ADCC killing. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:1887–1896. doi: 10.1007/s00262-009-0700-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Martin-Castillo B, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Vazquez-Martin A, Cufi S, Moreno JM, Corominas-Faja B, Urruticoechea A, Martin AG, Lopez-Bonet E, Menendez JA. Basal/HER2 breast carcinomas: integrating molecular taxonomy with cancer stem cell dynamics to predict primary resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) Cell Cycle. 2013;12:225–245. doi: 10.4161/cc.23274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Magnifico A, Albano L, Campaner S, Delia D, Castiglioni F, Gasparini P, Sozzi G, Fontanella E, Menard S, Tagliabue E. Tumor-initiating cells of HER2-positive carcinoma cell lines express the highest oncoprotein levels and are sensitive to trastuzumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2010–2021. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Zhu C, Qi X, Zhou X, Nie X, Gu Y. Sulfatase 2 facilitates lymphangiogenesis in breast cancer by regulating VEGF-D. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:3161–3171. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Xu S, Sui S, Zhang J, Bai N, Shi Q, Zhang G, Gao S, You Z, Zhan C, Liu F, Pang D. Downregulation of long noncoding RNA MALAT1 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the PI3K-AKT pathway in breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:4881–4891. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Baumann J, Wong J, Sun Y, Conklin DS. Palmitate-induced ER stress increases trastuzumab sensitivity in HER2/neu-positive breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:551. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2611-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Harrison H, Simoes BM, Rogerson L, Howell SJ, Landberg G, Clarke RB. Oestrogen increases the activity of oestrogen receptor negative breast cancer stem cells through paracrine EGFR and Notch signalling. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R21. doi: 10.1186/bcr3396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.He YY, Cai B, Yang YX, Liu XL, Wan XP. Estrogenic G protein-coupled receptor 30 signaling is involved in regulation of endometrial carcinoma by promoting proliferation, invasion potential, and interleukin-6 secretion via the MEK/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1051–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01148.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Novotny CJ, Pollari S, Park JH, Lemmon MA, Shen W, Shokat KM. Overcoming resistance to HER2 inhibitors through state-specific kinase binding. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:923–930. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102.Thakkar A, Wang B, Picon-Ruiz M, Buchwald P, Ince TA. Vitamin D and androgen receptor-targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;157:77–90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3807-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Yang S, Raymond-Stintz MA, Ying W, Zhang J, Lidke DS, Steinberg SL, Williams L, Oliver JM, Wilson BS. Mapping ErbB receptors on breast cancer cell membranes during signal transduction. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2763–2773. doi: 10.1242/jcs.007658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104.Blancafort A, Giro-Perafita A, Oliveras G, Palomeras S, Turrado C, Campuzano O, Carrion-Salip D, Massaguer A, Brugada R, Palafox M, Gomez-Miragaya J, Gonzalez-Suarez E, Puig T. Dual fatty acid synthase and HER2 signaling blockade shows marked antitumor activity against breast cancer models resistant to anti-HER2 drugs. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105.Di Cara G, Marengo G, Albanese NN, Marabeti MR, Musso R, Cancemi P, Pucci-Minafra I. Proteomic profiling of Trastuzumab (Herceptin(R))-sensitive and -resistant SKBR-3 breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:489–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106.Lu Y, Zi X, Pollak M. Molecular mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced attenuation of the growth-inhibitory activity of trastuzumab (Herceptin) on SKBR3 breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:334–341. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107.Oliveras-Ferraros C, Corominas-Faja B, Cufi S, Vazquez-Martin A, Martin-Castillo B, Iglesias JM, Lopez-Bonet E, Martin AG, Menendez JA. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) confers primary resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) Cell Cycle. 2012;11:4020–4032. doi: 10.4161/cc.22225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oncotarget-08-74188-s001.pdf^{(3.1MB, pdf)}

[R1] 1.Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, Chen VW, Clarke CA, Ries LA, Cronin KA. US Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Joint Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106 doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R2] 2.Parise CA, Caggiano V. Breast Cancer Survival Defined by the ER/PR/HER2 Subtypes and a Surrogate Classification according to Tumor Grade and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;2014:469251. doi: 10.1155/2014/469251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R3] 3.Mariani G, Fasolo A, De Benedictis E, Gianni L. Trastuzumab as adjuvant systemic therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2009;6:93–104. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R4] 4.Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R5] 5.Cortes J, Saura C, Bellet M, Munoz-Couselo E, Ramirez-Merino N, Calvo V, Perez J, Vidal M. HER2 and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer–blocking the right target. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:307–311. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R6] 6.Montemurro F, Di Cosimo S, Arpino G. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2715–2724. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R7] 7.Prat A, Baselga J. The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5:531–542. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R8] 8.Wu VS, Kanaya N, Lo C, Mortimer J, Chen S. From bench to bedside: what do we know about hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;153:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R9] 9.Huober J, Fasching PA, Barsoum M, Petruzelka L, Wallwiener D, Thomssen C, Reimer T, Paepke S, Azim HA, Ragosch V, Kubista E, Baumgärtner AK, Beckmann MW, et al. Higher efficacy of letrozole in combination with trastuzumab compared to letrozole monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer - results of the eLEcTRA trial. Breast. 2012;21:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R10] 10.Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, Bapsy PP, Vaid A, Wardley A, Tjulandin S, Jahn M, Lehle M, Feyereislova A, Révil C, Jones A. Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5529–37. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R11] 11.Schwartzberg LS, Franco SX, Florance A, O’Rourke L, Maltzman J, Johnston S. Lapatinib plus letrozole as first-line therapy for HER-2+ hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:122–29. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R12] 12.Nahta R, O’Regan RM. Therapeutic implications of estrogen receptor signaling in HER2-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:39–48. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R13] 13.Vici P, Pizzuti L, Natoli C, Gamucci T, Di Lauro L, Barba M, Sergi D, Botti C, Michelotti A, Moscetti L, Mariani L, Izzo F, D’Onofrio L, et al. Triple positive breast cancer: a distinct subtype? Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R14] 14.Kjellev S. The trefoil factor family-small peptides with multiple functionalities. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1350–1369. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8646-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R15] 15.Thim L. Trefoil peptides: from structure to function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1997;53:888–903. doi: 10.1007/s000180050108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R16] 16.Taupin DK, Podolsky D. Trefoil factors: initiators of mucosal healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:721. doi: 10.1038/nrm1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R17] 17.Emami S, Rodrigues S, Rodrigue CM, Le Floch N, Rivat C, Attoub S, Bruyneel E, Gespach C. Trefoil factor family (TFF) peptides and cancer progression. Peptides. 2004;25:885–898. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R18] 18.Perry JK, Kannan N, Grandison PM, Mitchell MD, Lobie PE. Are trefoil factors oncogenic? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008;19:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R19] 19.Im S, Yoo C, Jung JH, Choi HJ, Yoo J, Kang CS. Reduced expression of TFF1 and increased expression of TFF3 in gastric cancer: correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:133–140. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R20] 20.Khoury T, Chadha K, Javle M, Donohue K, Levea C, Iyer R, Okada H, Nagase H, Tan D. Expression of intestinal trefoil factor (TFF-3) in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;35:171–177. doi: 10.1385/IJGC:35:3:171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R21] 21.Okada H, Kimura M, Tan D, Fujiwara K, Igarashi J, Makuuchi M, Hui AM, Tsurumaru M, Nagase H. Frequent trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) overexpression and promoter hypomethylation in mouse and human hepatocellular carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2005;26:369–377. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R22] 22.Sun Q, Zhang Y, Liu F, Zhao X, Yang X. Identification of candidate biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma through pre-cancerous expression analysis in an HBx transgenic mouse. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:1532–1538. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.10.4683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R23] 23.You ML, Chen YJ, Chong QY, Wu MM, Pandey V, Chen RM, Liu L, Ma L, Wu ZS, Zhu T, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 mediation of oncogenicity and chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma is AKT-BCL-2 dependent. Oncotarget. 2017;8:39323–44. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16950. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R24] 24.Perera O, Evans A, Pertziger M, MacDonald C, Chen H, Liu DX, Lobie PE, Perry JK. Trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) enhances the oncogenic characteristics of prostate carcinoma cells and reduces sensitivity to ionising radiation. Cancer Lett. 2015;361:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R25] 25.Yuan Z, Chen D, Chen X, Yang H, Wei Y. Overexpression of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) contributes to the malignant progression in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:7. doi: 10.1186/s12935-016-0379-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R26] 26.Qu Y, Yang Y, Ma D, Xiao W. Increased trefoil factor 3 levels in the serum of patients with three major histological subtypes of lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2012;27:1277–1283. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R27] 27.Wang XN, Wang SJ, Pandey V, Chen P, Li Q, Wu ZS, Wu Q, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 as a novel biomarker to distinguish between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Medicine. 2015;94:e860. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R28] 28.Ahmed AR, Griffiths AB, Tilby MT, Westley BR, May FE. TFF3 is a normal breast epithelial protein and is associated with differentiated phenotype in early breast cancer but predisposes to invasion and metastasis in advanced disease. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:904–916. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R29] 29.Kannan N, Kang J, Kong X, Tang J, Perry JK, Mohankumar KM, Miller LD, Liu ET, Mertani HC, Zhu T, Grandison PM, Liu DX, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 is oncogenic and mediates anti-estrogen resistance in human mammary carcinoma. Neoplasia. 2010;12:1041–1053. doi: 10.1593/neo.10916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R30] 30.Pandey V, Zhang M, You M, Zhu T, Xu XQ, Lobie PE. OR25–6: Expression of Two Genetic Elements Is Sufficient to Stimulate Oncogenic Transformation of Human Mammary Epithelial Cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[R31] 31.Pandey V, Wu ZS, Zhang M, Li R, Zhang J, Zhu T, Lobie PE. Trefoil factor 3 promotes metastatic seeding and predicts poor survival outcome of patients with mammary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:429. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0429-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R32] 32.Lau WH, Pandey V, Kong X, Wang XN, Wu Z, Zhu T, Lobie PE. Trefoil Factor-3 (TFF3) Stimulates De Novo Angiogenesis in Mammary Carcinoma both Directly and Indirectly via IL-8/CXCR2. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R33] 33.May FE, Westley BR. Expression of human intestinal trefoil factor in malignant cells and its regulation by oestrogen in breast cancer cells. J Pathol. 1997;182:404–413. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199708)182:4<404::AID-PATH875>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R34] 34.Thomsen KG, Lyng MB, Elias D, Vever H, Knoop AS, Lykkesfeldt AE, Laenkholm AV, Ditzel HJ. Gene expression alterations associated with outcome in aromatase inhibitor-treated ER+ early-stage breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154:483–494. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3644-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R35] 35.Giuliano M, Trivedi MV, Schiff R. Bidirectional Crosstalk between the Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer: Molecular Basis and Clinical Implications. Breast Care (Basel) 2013;8:256–262. doi: 10.1159/000354253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R36] 36.Klapper LN, Glathe S, Vaisman N, Hynes NE, Andrews GC, Sela M, Yarden Y. The ErbB-2/HER2 oncoprotein of human carcinomas may function solely as a shared coreceptor for multiple stroma-derived growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4995–5000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R37] 37.Creighton C, Hilger A, Murthy S, Rae J, Chinnaiyan A, El-Ashry D. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer cells in vitro induces an in vivo molecular phenotype of estrogen receptor alpha-negative human breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3903–3911. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R38] 38.Evans AH, Pancholi S, Farmer I, Thornhill A, Evans DB, Johnston SR, Dowsett M, Martin LA. EGFR/HER2 inhibitor AEE788 increases ER-mediated transcription in HER2/ER-positive breast cancer cells but functions synergistically with endocrine therapy. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1235–1243. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R39] 39.Konecny G, Pauletti G, Pegram M, Untch M, Dandekar S, Aguilar Z, Wilson C, Rong H, Bauerfeind I, Felber M. Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:142–153. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.2.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R40] 40.Oh AS, Lorant LA, Holloway JN, Miller DL, Kern FG, El-Ashry D. Hyperactivation of MAPK induces loss of ERalpha expression in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15:1344–1359. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.8.0678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R41] 41.Sabnis G, Schayowitz A, Goloubeva O, Macedo L, Brodie A. Trastuzumab reverses letrozole resistance and amplifies the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to estrogen. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1416–1428. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R42] 42.Stoica A, Saceda M, Doraiswamy VL, Coleman C, Martin MB. Regulation of estrogen receptor-alpha gene expression by epidermal growth factor. J Endocrinol. 2000;165:371–378. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1650371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R43] 43.Tang CK, Perez C, Grunt T, Waibel C, Cho C, Lupu R. Involvement of heregulin-beta2 in the acquisition of the hormone-independent phenotype of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3350–3358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R44] 44.Xia W, Bacus S, Hegde P, Husain I, Strum J, Liu L, Paulazzo G, Lyass L, Trusk P, Hill J, Harris J, Spector NL. A model of acquired autoresistance to a potent ErbB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a therapeutic strategy to prevent its onset in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:7795–7800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602468103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R45] 45.Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–137. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R46] 46.Nahta R, Yuan LX, Zhang B, Kobayashi R, Esteva FJ. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterodimerization contributes to trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11118–11128. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R47] 47.Tanizaki J, Okamoto I, Sakai K, Nakagawa K. Differential roles of trans-phosphorylated EGFR, HER2, HER3, and RET as heterodimerisation partners of MET in lung cancer with MET amplification. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:807–813. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R48] 48.Chen YH, Lu Y, De Plaen IG, Wang LY, Tan XD. Transcription factor NF-kappaB signals antianoikic function of trefoil factor 3 on intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;274:576–582. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R49] 49.Rivat C, Rodrigues S, Bruyneel E, Pietu G, Robert A, Redeuilh G, Bracke M, Gespach C, Attoub S. Implication of STAT3 signaling in human colonic cancer cells during intestinal trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) — and vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated cellular invasion and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2005;65:195–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R50] 50.Zhu YQ, Tan XD. TFF3 modulates NF-{kappa}B and a novel negative regulatory molecule of NF-{kappa}B in intestinal epithelial cells via a mechanism distinct from TNF-{alpha} Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;289:C1085–1093. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00185.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R51] 51.Carpenter RL, Lo HW. Regulation of Apoptosis by HER2 in Breast Cancer. J Carcinog Mutagen. 2013;2013:S7. doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.S7-003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R52] 52.Lane HA, Beuvink I, Motoyama AB, Daly JM, Neve RM, Hynes NE. ErbB2 potentiates breast tumor proliferation through modulation of p27(Kip1)-Cdk2 complex formation: receptor overexpression does not determine growth dependency. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:3210–3223. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.9.3210-3223.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R53] 53.Yakes FM, Chinratanalab W, Ritter CA, King W, Seelig S, Arteaga CL. Herceptin-induced inhibition of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and Akt Is required for antibody-mediated effects on p27, cyclin D1, and antitumor action. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4132–4141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R54] 54.Yang HY, Zhou BP, Hung MC, Lee MH. Oncogenic signals of HER-2/neu in regulating the stability of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:24735–24739. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000147200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R55] 55.Kumar R, Mandal M, Lipton A, Harvey H, Thompson CB. Overexpression of HER2 modulates bcl-2, bcl-XL, and tamoxifen-induced apoptosis in human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:1215–1219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R56] 56.Milella M, Trisciuoglio D, Bruno T, Ciuffreda L, Mottolese M, Cianciulli A, Cognetti F, Zangemeister-Wittke U, Del Bufalo D, Zupi G. Trastuzumab down-regulates Bcl-2 expression and potentiates apoptosis induction by Bcl-2/Bcl-XL bispecific antisense oligonucleotides in HER-2 gene--amplified breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7747–7756. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R57] 57.Siddiqa A, Long LM, Li L, Marciniak RA, Kazhdan I. Expression of HER-2 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells modulates anti-apoptotic proteins Survivin and Bcl-2 via the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R58] 58.Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12:207–218. doi: 10.1089/adt.2014.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R59] 59.Argiris A, Wang CX, Whalen SG, DiGiovanna MP. Synergistic interactions between tamoxifen and trastuzumab (Herceptin) Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1409–1420. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1060-02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R60] 60.Ding K, Banerjee A, Tan S, Zhao J, Zhuang Q, Li R, Qian P, Liu S, Wu ZS, Lobie PE, Zhu T. Artemin, a member of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family of ligands, is HER2-regulated and mediates acquired trastuzumab resistance by promoting cancer stem cell-like behavior in mammary carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:16057–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.529552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R61] 61.Korkaya H, Kim GI, Davis A, Malik F, Henry NL, Ithimakin S, Quraishi AA, Tawakkol N, D’Angelo R, Paulson AK, Chung S, Luther T, Paholak HJ, et al. Activation of an IL6 inflammatory loop mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer by expanding the cancer stem cell population. Mol Cell. 2012;47:570–584. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R62] 62.May FE, Westley BR. TFF3 is a valuable predictive biomarker of endocrine response in metastatic breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:465–479. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R63] 63.Gu J, Zheng L, Zhang L, Chen S, Zhu M, Li X, Wang Y. TFF3 and HER2 expression and their correlation with survival in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:3001–3007. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2933-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R64] 64.Xu CC, Yue L, Wei HJ, Zhao WW, Sui AH, Wang XM, Qiu WS. Significance of TFF3 protein and Her-2/neu status in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209:479–485. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R65] 65.Yue L, Xiang J, Shen Z, Wang Z, Yao Y, Zhou Q, Ding A, Qiu W. Inhibition of ErbB-2 induces TFF3 downregulation in breast cancer cell lines. APMIS. 2014;122:628–635. doi: 10.1111/apm.12203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R66] 66.Dokmanovic M, Wu WJ. Trastuzumab-induced HER2 phosphorylation: exploring the mechanisms and implications. Receptors Clin Investig. 2014;1:e340. [Google Scholar]

[R67] 67.Dokmanovic M, Wu Y, Shen Y, Chen J, Hirsch DS, Wu WJ. Trastuzumab-induced recruitment of Csk-homologous kinase (CHK) to ErbB2 receptor is associated with ErbB2-Y1248 phosphorylation and ErbB2 degradation to mediate cell growth inhibition. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;15:1029–1041. doi: 10.4161/cbt.29171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R68] 68.Gijsen M, King P, Perera T, Parker PJ, Harris AL, Larijani B, Kong A. HER2 phosphorylation is maintained by a PKB negative feedback loop in response to anti-HER2 herceptin in breast cancer. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R69] 69.Baus-Loncar M, Al-azzeh ED, Romanska H, Lalani el N, Stamp GW, Blin N, Kayademir T. Transcriptional control of TFF3 (intestinal trefoil factor) via promoter binding sites for the nuclear factor kappaB and C/EBPbeta. Peptides. 2004;25:849–854. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R70] 70.Loncar MB, Al-azzeh ED, Sommer PS, Marinovic M, Schmehl K, Kruschewski M, Blin N, Stohwasser R, Gott P, Kayademir T. Tumour necrosis factor alpha and nuclear factor kappaB inhibit transcription of human TFF3 encoding a gastrointestinal healing peptide. Gut. 2003;52:1297–1303. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.9.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R71] 71.Merkhofer EC, Cogswell P, Baldwin AS. Her2 activates NF-kappaB and induces invasion through the canonical pathway involving IKKalpha. Oncogene. 2010;29:1238–1248. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R72] 72.Kinoshita K, Taupin DR, Itoh H, Podolsky DK. Distinct pathways of cell migration and antiapoptotic response to epithelial injury: structure-function analysis of human intestinal trefoil factor. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:4680–4690. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.13.4680-4690.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R73] 73.Storesund T, Schenck K, Osmundsen H, Roed A, Helgeland K, Kolltveit KM. Signal transduction and gene transcription induced by TFF3 in oral keratinocytes. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:511–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R74] 74.Biscardi JS, Maa MC, Tice DA, Cox ME, Leu TH, Parsons SJ. c-Src-mediated phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor on Tyr845 and Tyr1101 is associated with modulation of receptor function. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:8335–8343. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R75] 75.Hoffmann W. Trefoil factors TFF (trefoil factor family) peptide-triggered signals promoting mucosal restitution. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:2932–2938. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5481-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R76] 76.Taupin D, Wu DC, Jeon WK, Devaney K, Wang TC, Podolsky DK. The trefoil gene family are coordinately expressed immediate-early genes: EGF receptor- and MAP kinase-dependent interregulation. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:R31–38. doi: 10.1172/JCI3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R77] 77.Belsches-Jablonski AP, Biscardi JS, Peavy DR, Tice DA, Romney DA, Parsons SJ. Src family kinases and HER2 interactions in human breast cancer cell growth and survival. Oncogene. 2001;20:1465–1475. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R78] 78.Hoffmann W. TFF (trefoil factor family) peptides and their potential roles for differentiation processes during airway remodeling. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:2716–2719. doi: 10.2174/092986707782023226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R79] 79.Lin J, Sun Z, Zhang W, Liu H, Shao D, Ren Y, Wen Y, Cao L, Wolfram J, Yang Z. Protective effects of intestinal trefoil factor (ITF) on gastric mucosal epithelium through activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;404:263–270. doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2386-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R80] 80.Lin N, Xu LF, Sun M. The protective effect of trefoil factor 3 on the intestinal tight junction barrier is mediated by toll-like receptor 2 via a PI3K/Akt dependent mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;440:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R81] 81.Sun Z, Liu H, Yang Z, Shao D, Zhang W, Ren Y, Sun B, Lin J, Xu M, Nie S. Intestinal trefoil factor activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to protect gastric mucosal epithelium from damage. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:1123–1132. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R82] 82.Taupin DR, Kinoshita K, Podolsky DK. Intestinal trefoil factor confers colonic epithelial resistance to apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:799–804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R83] 83.Ma P, Maulik G, Christensen J, Salgia R. c-Met: structure, functions and potential for therapeutic inhibition. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:309–325. doi: 10.1023/a:1023768811842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R84] 84.Iams WT, Lovly CM. Molecular Pathways: Clinical Applications and Future Direction of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Pathway Blockade. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:4270–4277. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R85] 85.Burstein HJ, Harris LN, Gelman R, Lester SC, Nunes RA, Kaelin CM, Parker LM, Ellisen LW, Kuter I, Gadd MA, Christian RL, Kennedy PR, Borges VF, et al. Preoperative therapy with trastuzumab and paclitaxel followed by sequential adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2 overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: a pilot study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:46–53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R86] 86.Harris LN, You F, Schnitt SJ, Witkiewicz A, Lu X, Sgroi D, Ryan PD, Come SE, Burstein HJ, Lesnikoski BA, Kamma M, Friedman PN, Gelman R, et al. Predictors of resistance to preoperative trastuzumab and vinorelbine for HER2-positive early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1198–1207. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R87] 87.Hurley J, Doliny P, Reis I, Silva O, Gomez-Fernandez C, Velez P, Pauletti G, Powell JE, Pegram MD, Slamon DJ. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1831–1838. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R88] 88.Mittendorf EA, Wu Y, Scaltriti M, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt KK, Dawood S, Esteva FJ, Buzdar AU, Chen H, Eksambi S, Hortobagyi GN, Baselga J, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Loss of HER2 amplification following trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant systemic therapy and survival outcomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7381–7388. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R89] 89.Pectasides D, Gaglia A, Arapantoni-Dadioti P, Bobota A, Valavanis C, Kostopoulou V, Mylonakis N, Karabelis A, Pectasides M, Economopoulos T. HER-2/neu status of primary breast cancer and corresponding metastatic sites in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-based therapy. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:647–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R90] 90.Ritter CA, Perez-Torres M, Rinehart C, Guix M, Dugger T, Engelman JA, Arteaga CL. Human breast cancer cells selected for resistance to trastuzumab in vivo overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor and ErbB ligands and remain dependent on the ErbB receptor network. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4909–4919. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R91] 91.Wang YC, Morrison G, Gillihan R, Guo J, Ward RM, Fu X, Botero MF, Healy NA, Hilsenbeck SG, Phillips GL, Chamness GC, Rimawi MF, Osborne CK, et al. Different mechanisms for resistance to trastuzumab versus lapatinib in HER2-positive breast cancers–role of estrogen receptor and HER2 reactivation. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R121. doi: 10.1186/bcr3067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R92] 92.Gennari R, Menard S, Fagnoni F, Ponchio L, Scelsi M, Tagliabue E, Castiglioni F, Villani L, Magalotti C, Gibelli N, Oliviero B, Ballardini B, Da Prada G, et al. Pilot study of the mechanism of action of preoperative trastuzumab in patients with primary operable breast tumors overexpressing HER2. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5650–5655. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R93] 93.Kute TE, Savage L, Stehle JR, Jr, Kim-Shapiro JW, Blanks MJ, Wood J, Vaughn JP. Breast tumor cells isolated from in vitro resistance to trastuzumab remain sensitive to trastuzumab anti-tumor effects in vivo and to ADCC killing. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58:1887–1896. doi: 10.1007/s00262-009-0700-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R94] 94.Martin-Castillo B, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Vazquez-Martin A, Cufi S, Moreno JM, Corominas-Faja B, Urruticoechea A, Martin AG, Lopez-Bonet E, Menendez JA. Basal/HER2 breast carcinomas: integrating molecular taxonomy with cancer stem cell dynamics to predict primary resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) Cell Cycle. 2013;12:225–245. doi: 10.4161/cc.23274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R95] 95.Magnifico A, Albano L, Campaner S, Delia D, Castiglioni F, Gasparini P, Sozzi G, Fontanella E, Menard S, Tagliabue E. Tumor-initiating cells of HER2-positive carcinoma cell lines express the highest oncoprotein levels and are sensitive to trastuzumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2010–2021. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R96] 96.Zhu C, Qi X, Zhou X, Nie X, Gu Y. Sulfatase 2 facilitates lymphangiogenesis in breast cancer by regulating VEGF-D. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:3161–3171. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R97] 97.Xu S, Sui S, Zhang J, Bai N, Shi Q, Zhang G, Gao S, You Z, Zhan C, Liu F, Pang D. Downregulation of long noncoding RNA MALAT1 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the PI3K-AKT pathway in breast cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:4881–4891. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R98] 98.Baumann J, Wong J, Sun Y, Conklin DS. Palmitate-induced ER stress increases trastuzumab sensitivity in HER2/neu-positive breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:551. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2611-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R99] 99.Harrison H, Simoes BM, Rogerson L, Howell SJ, Landberg G, Clarke RB. Oestrogen increases the activity of oestrogen receptor negative breast cancer stem cells through paracrine EGFR and Notch signalling. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R21. doi: 10.1186/bcr3396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R100] 100.He YY, Cai B, Yang YX, Liu XL, Wan XP. Estrogenic G protein-coupled receptor 30 signaling is involved in regulation of endometrial carcinoma by promoting proliferation, invasion potential, and interleukin-6 secretion via the MEK/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1051–1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01148.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R101] 101.Novotny CJ, Pollari S, Park JH, Lemmon MA, Shen W, Shokat KM. Overcoming resistance to HER2 inhibitors through state-specific kinase binding. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:923–930. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R102] 102.Thakkar A, Wang B, Picon-Ruiz M, Buchwald P, Ince TA. Vitamin D and androgen receptor-targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;157:77–90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3807-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R103] 103.Yang S, Raymond-Stintz MA, Ying W, Zhang J, Lidke DS, Steinberg SL, Williams L, Oliver JM, Wilson BS. Mapping ErbB receptors on breast cancer cell membranes during signal transduction. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2763–2773. doi: 10.1242/jcs.007658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R104] 104.Blancafort A, Giro-Perafita A, Oliveras G, Palomeras S, Turrado C, Campuzano O, Carrion-Salip D, Massaguer A, Brugada R, Palafox M, Gomez-Miragaya J, Gonzalez-Suarez E, Puig T. Dual fatty acid synthase and HER2 signaling blockade shows marked antitumor activity against breast cancer models resistant to anti-HER2 drugs. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R105] 105.Di Cara G, Marengo G, Albanese NN, Marabeti MR, Musso R, Cancemi P, Pucci-Minafra I. Proteomic profiling of Trastuzumab (Herceptin(R))-sensitive and -resistant SKBR-3 breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:489–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R106] 106.Lu Y, Zi X, Pollak M. Molecular mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced attenuation of the growth-inhibitory activity of trastuzumab (Herceptin) on SKBR3 breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:334–341. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[R107] 107.Oliveras-Ferraros C, Corominas-Faja B, Cufi S, Vazquez-Martin A, Martin-Castillo B, Iglesias JM, Lopez-Bonet E, Martin AG, Menendez JA. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) confers primary resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin) Cell Cycle. 2012;11:4020–4032. doi: 10.4161/cc.22225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Release of HER2 repression of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) expression mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+/ER+ mammary carcinoma

Qing-Yun Chong

Ming-Liang You

Vijay Pandey

Arindam Banerjee

Yi-Jun Chen

Han-Ming Poh

Mengyi Zhang

Lan Ma

Tao Zhu

Salundi Basappa

Liang Liu

Peter E Lobie

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

RESULTS

HER2 activation decreases TFF3 expression in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells partially in an ERα-independent manner

Figure 1. Activation of HER2 decreased TFF3 expression, while inhibition of HER2 increased TFF3 expression in BT474 cells partially in an ERα-independent manner.

HER2 inhibition by trastuzumab increases TFF3 expression in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells partially in an ERα-independent manner

TFF3 mediates the activation of HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells

Figure 2. Forced expression of TFF3 activated HER signalling activity, while inhibition of TFF3 by AMPC decreased HER signalling activity in BT474 cells.

TFF3 increases the 3D growth of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells in the presence of trastuzumab

Figure 3. Forced expression of TFF3 increased, whereas AMPC inhibition of TFF3 decreased 3D Matrigel growth of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells in the presence of trastuzumab.

TFF3 expression is markedly increased in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells

Figure 4. TFF3 is highly upregulated, while HER signalling is markedly decreased in trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells as compared to control cells.

Figure 5. TFF3 is upregulated, while HER signalling is decreased in trastuzumab resistant MDA-MB-361 cells as compared to control cells.

Depletion of TFF3 abrogates the growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells without re-sensitization to trastuzumab

Figure 6. Depleted expression of TFF3 decreased 3D Matrigel growth of trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, without re-sensitization to trastuzumab.

Inhibition of TFF3 abrogates the survival and growth advantage of trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells without re-sensitization to trastuzumab

Figure 7. AMPC inhibition of TFF3 decreased monolayer cell viability, increased apoptosis and decreased 3D Matrigel growth of trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells, without re-sensitization to trastuzumab.

Inhibition of TFF3 abrogates the increased cancer stem cell (CSC)-like behaviour in trastuzumab resistant HER2+/ER+ breast cancer cells

Figure 8. Trastuzumab resistant BT474 cells exhibited higher cancer stem cell-like behavior that was abrogated by AMPC inhibition of TFF3.

DISCUSSION

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture, transfection and trastuzumab resistant cells generation

Reagents

Luciferase reporter assay

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis

Western blot analysis/immunoblotting

Cell function assays

Cancer stem cell (CSC) assay

Statistical analysis

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FIGURES

Acknowledgments

REFERENCES

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases