Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2017 Oct 7;15:567–572. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.005

Data on the expression of leptin and leptin receptor in the dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord after preganglionic cervical root avulsion

Kai-Ting Chang a,b, Yi-Lo Lin b,c, Chi-Te Lin b,d,e, May-Jywan Tsai b, Wen-Cheng Huang b,f,g,h, Yang-Hsin Shih f, Yi-Yen Lee h, Henrich Cheng a,b,f,g,i, Ming-Chao Huang b,e,h,j,
PMCID: PMC5651484  PMID: 29071294

Abstract

Leptin (Lep) is mainly, although not exclusively, secreted by adipocytes. In addition to regulating lipid metabolism, it is also a proinflammatory factor and involved in the development of neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) (Lim et al., 2009; Maeda et al., 2009) [1,2]. Leptin or its messenger ribonucleic acid expression has been found in various brain regions normally and in the dorsal horn after PNI (Lim et al., 2009; Ur et al., 2002; La Cava et al., 2004; White et al., 2004) [1,[3], [4], [5]]. However, the expression pattern of Lep and Leptin receptor (LepR) after preganglionic cervical root avulsion (PCRA) is still unknown. We provide data in this article related to Chang et al. (2017) [6]. Here, our data showed a profound Lep and LepR expression in the neurons of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) after PCRA. Moreover, the expression of Lep and LepR were also identified in significant portions of the neurons and microglia located in the dorsal horn. The roles of these increased expressions in the development of neuropathic pain after PCRA deserve further study.

Keyword: Leptin, Leptin receptor, Microglia, Root avulsion


Specification Table

Subject area Neuroscience
More specific subject area Leptin (Lep), Leptin receptor (LepR), Neural trauma, spinal cord, dorsal root ganglion (DRG)
Type of data Image (immunofluorescence)
How data was acquired Fluorescent microscope (Axioskop 2 Carl Zeiss, LLC, United States)
Data format Raw
Experimental factors DRG (Fig. 1) and dorsal horn (DH) of spinal cord (Fig. 2, Fig. 3) was obtained from C57BL/6J mice after preganglionic cervical root avulsion (PCRA)
Experimental features The DRG and DH were labeled using primary antibodies raised against leptin, its receptor, ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1, microglia), neuronal nuclei (NeuN, neuron), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, astrocyte).
Data source location Taipei, Taiwan.
Data accessibility Data within this article

Value of the Data

  • Generalized expression of Lep and LepR was noted 7 days after PCRA in DRG neurons. However, it has been reported that around 95% of DRG neurons die after PCRA [7]. The functions and/or effect of the leptin produced by neurons undergoing apoptosis remain to be clarified.

  • Substantial intracellular expression of Lep was noted in the neurons of spinal cord after PCRA. It is known that extracellular leptin acts on its receptor located in the cell membrane of neurons. However, the roles of the intraneuronal Lep in the development of neuropathic pain have not been studied.

  • Significant amount of Lep was noted in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in neurons and microglia, but not in astrocytes. The control mechanism and the significance of this de novo production of Lep are of interest for future investigation.

  • It is reported that LepR has been found to be increased after PNI in neurons, and to a lesser extent in astrocytes [1]. But after PCRA, we found that significant number of microglia has LepR expression. Does this difference be relevant to the different clinical presentation of the neuropathic pain after PNI and PCRA requires further research.

1. Data

We showed that both Lep and LepR were expressed in the DRG on day 7th after PCRA (Fig. 1). By using double immunolabeling for Lep/LepR and markers of specific cell populations, we found that after PCRA, there are increased expression of leptin in the dorsal horn [6]. This increased leptin expression was colocalized with NeuN (19%) and Iba1 (37%), but not with GFAP (Fig. 2). Similarly, increased expression of LepR was also noted [6]. The LepR was also coexpressed with NeuN (56%) and Iba1 (47%), but not with GFAP (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Both leptin (A) and leptin receptor (B) were expressed in the dorsal root ganglion.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Double immunofluorescence staining of leptin with Iba1, NeuN, and GFAP. (A) Leptin was colocalized with Iba1. (B) Leptin was colocalized with NeuN. (C) Leptin was not colocalized with GFAP. Scale bar, 20 µm.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Double immunofluorescence staining of LepR with NeuN, Iba1, and GFAP. (A) NeuN-positive cells were also positive for LepR. (B) Iba1-positive cells were also positive for LepR. (C) GFAP positive cells were not positive for LepR. Scale bar, 20 µm.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Animals

Adult male and female C57BL/6J (n = 10) were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Center in Taiwan. All animals were housed in ventilated and humidity- and temperature-controlled rooms with a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Animals were maintained according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences (National Research Council, USA). All experimental procedures complied with the Ethical Guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain. The protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.

2.2. Surgical procedures

The 13-week-old male and female C57BL/6J mice (23.5 ± 3.8 g) (n = 10) were anaesthetized using isoflurane and placed on a heating pad. Rectal temperatures were monitored during surgery. All animals received a left hemi-laminectomy at the cervical 5th–7th vertebrae. After the dura was opened, the left 6th–8th cervical dorsal roots were identified, gently pulled, and avulsed at their junctions with the spinal cord, leaving no proximal stump.

2.3. Immunofluorescence

Animals were sacrificed 7 days after surgery. Tissues were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and kept in 30% sucrose/15% glycerol at 4 °C. Cryosections (10-µm-thick) were stained using standard immunofluorescence methods. Briefly, the sections were blocked in 5% normal donkey serum (Jackson Immuno-Research, West Grove, PA, USA) and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: microglial marker [Iba1 (1:500; #019-19741, Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany)], astrocyte marker [GFAP (1:1000; AB5804, chemicon, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)], neuronal marker [NeuN (1:100; MAB377, chemicon, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany)], leptin (1:50; AF498, R&D system, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and the LepR (1:100, AF497, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The following fluorescent secondary antibodies were then applied: Alexa 488 donkey anti-rabbit, Alexa 488 donkey anti-mouse, Cy3 donkey anti-goat, and Cy3 donkey anti-rabbit (Jackson Immuno-Research, West Grove, PA, USA). The sections were visualized at 200× magnification under a fluorescence (Axioskop 2 Carl Zeiss, LLC, United States) microscope. The numbers of Lep+, LepR+ with Iba1+, GFAP+, and NeuN+ cells were quantified by counting the percentage of positive cells in the superficial lamina (SL) of the dorsal horn of one or two randomly selected regions in each corresponding area of the spinal cord throughout the 6th–8th levels. In total, 5 sections were selected for each animal. The percentage of Lep and LepR with Iba1, NeuN and GFAP positive cells was counted by dividing the number of Lep, LepR/ Iba1, NeuN and GFAP cells by the number of Iba1, NeuN and GFAP cells. The personnel who were assigned to quantify the results were blinded to the treatment group of the animals in all studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Szu-Han Wang, Yung-Hsin Cheng, Wen-Chi Chang, Hsueh-Chen Huang, Hsiao-Chi Lin, and Ching-Jung Chen for their technical assistance.

Source of funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Science Council [NSC 99-2314-B-075-010-MY3], the Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 102-2314-B-075-031-MY3], the Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V102E6-001, V103E6-001 and V104E6-001], and the Vivian Wu Foundation [VWY 103-001 and VWY 104-001].

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.005.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Transparency document

mmc1.docx (11.5KB, docx)

.

References

  • 1.Lim G., Wang S., Zhang Y., Tian Y., Mao J. Spinal leptin contributes to the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain in rodents. J. Clin. Investig. 2009;119:295–304. doi: 10.1172/JCI36785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maeda T., Kiguchi N., Kobayashi Y., Ikuta T., Ozaki M., Kishioka S. Leptin derived from adipocytes in injured peripheral nerves facilitates development of neuropathic pain via macrophage stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:13076–13081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903524106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ur E., Wilkinson D.A., Morash B.A., Wilkinson M. Leptin immunoreactivity is localized to neurons in rat brain. Neuroendocrinology. 2002;75:264–272. doi: 10.1159/000054718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.La Cava A., Matarese G. The weight of leptin in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:371–379. doi: 10.1038/nri1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White J.R., Harris R.A., Lee S.R., Craigon M.H., Binley K., Price T., Naylor S. Genetic amplification of the transcriptional response to hypoxia as a novel means of identifying regulators of angiogenesis. Genomics. 2004;83:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0888-7543(03)00215-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.>K.T. Chang, Y.L. Lin, C.T. Lin, C.J. Hong, M.J.Tsai, W.C. Huang, Y.H. Shih, Y.Y. Lee, H. Cheng and M.C. Huang, Leptin is essential for microglial activation and neuropathic pain after preganglionic cervical root avulsion, Life Sci. 15 (2017) 31-41. 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Lee L.M., Huang M.C., Chuang T.Y., Lee L.S., Cheng H., Lee I.H. Acidic FGF enhances functional regeneration of adult dorsal roots. Life Sci. 2004;74:1937–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Transparency document

mmc1.docx (11.5KB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES