Abstract
Objective
Radiotracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have increasingly been recognized as showing uptake in a number of normal structures, anatomic variants, and non-prostate-cancer pathologies. We aimed to explore the frequency and degree of uptake in peripheral ganglia in patients undergoing PET with the PSMA-targeted agent 18F-DCFPyL.
Methods
A total of 98 patients who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging were retrospectively analyzed. This included 76 men with prostate cancer (PCa) and 22 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 13 men, 9 women). Scans were evaluated for uptake in the cervical, stellate, celiac, lumbar and sacral ganglia. Maximum standardized uptake value corrected to body weight (SUVmax), and maximum standardized uptake value corrected to lean body mass (SULmax) were recorded for all ganglia with visible uptake above background. Ganglia-to-background ratios were calculated by dividing the SUVmax and SULmax values by the mean uptake in the ascending aorta (Aortamean) and the right gluteus muscle (Gluteusmean).
Results
Overall, 95 of 98 (96.9%) patients demonstrated uptake in at least one of the evaluated peripheral ganglia. With regard to the PCa cohort, the most frequent sites of radiotracer accumulation were lumbar ganglia (55/76, 72.4%), followed by the cervical ganglia (51/76, 67.1%). Bilateral uptake was found in the majority of cases [lumbar 44/55 (80%) and cervical 30/51 (58.8%)]. Additionally, discernible radiotracer uptake was recorded in 50/76 (65.8%) of the analyzed stellate ganglia and in 45/76 (59.2%) of the celiac ganglia, whereas only 5/76 (6.6%) of the sacral ganglia demonstrated 18F-DCFPyL accumulation. Similar findings were observed for patients with RCC, with the most frequent locations of radiotracer uptake in both the lumbar (20/22, 90.9%) and cervical ganglia (19/22, 86.4%). No laterality preference was found in mean PSMA-ligand uptake for either the PCa or RCC cohorts.
Conclusion
As PSMA-targeted agents become more widely disseminated, the patterns of uptake in structures that are not directly relevant to patients’ cancers must be understood. This is the first systematic evaluation of the uptake of 18F-DCFPyL in ganglia demonstrating a general trend with a descending frequency of radiotracer accumulation in lumbar, cervical, stellate, celiac, and sacral ganglia. The underlying biology that leads to variability of PSMA-targeted radiotracers in peripheral ganglia is not currently understood, but may provide opportunities for future research.
Keywords: 18F-DCFPyL, Imaging pitfalls, Prostate cancer, PSMA, Ganglia
Introduction
Recently, PET radiotracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), labeled with either 68Ga or 18F, have demonstrated favorable results for imaging men with prostate cancer (PCa) in a variety of clinical contexts [1–3]. Moreover, the potential utility of imaging non-prostate malignancies such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has begun to be more widely reported [4]. Compared to the more commonly used 68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted agents, the 18F-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand 18F-DCFPyL possesses the inherent advantages of a longer physical half-life, lower positron energy, and higher positron yield, and there have also been suggestions of a higher detection rate for sites of disease as well as an increased tumor-to-background ratio [5].
Regarding the biodistribution of PSMA-targeted agents, the variability of 18F-DCFPyL uptake in several solid organs was recently assessed and demonstrated a visually homogenous uptake in the normal liver along with intrinsic variability even lower than 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG). Uptake was also noted in the lacrimal glands, salivary glands, spleen, kidneys, and small bowel [6]. 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC, the most commonly used of the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers, parallels the biodistribution of 18F-DCFPyL, with focal uptake in all the same organs and with both radiotracers having the highest uptake in the kidneys [6]. The similar biodistributions of these PSMA-targeted agents suggest that normal variant sites of uptake and potential interpretive pitfalls will be similar between these compounds. Indeed, a number of potential false-positive findings have been described that the interpreting imaging specialist should be aware of while analyzing 18F-DCFPyL or 68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted PET scans, including increased radiotracer accumulation in various benign entities (e.g., in adrenal or thyroid adenomas as well as in Paget’s disease [7–9]).
Interestingly, PSMA expression has been described in nervous tissue, where this protein is known as glutamate carboxypeptidase II or N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase (NAALADase). In fact, PSMA has been recognized as a potential therapeutic target in several neurological disorders [10, 11]. PSMA-targeted PET radiotracer uptake has also been seen in sympathetic chain and ganglion structures and should be considered physiologic rather than pathologic, particularly in the celiac and stellate ganglia [12]. To further investigate the pattern of PSMA-targeted radiotracer uptake within ganglia on a larger scale, we performed a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the peripheral ganglia of patients with PCa and RCC who were imaged with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT on one of several prospective protocols evaluating this radiotracer. We would anticipate that the results of this study would be applicable to other PSMA-targeted radiotracers.
Patient and methods
Patient population
In total, 98 patients who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging between March 2015 and October 2016 were included in this retrospective post hoc evaluation: 76 men with known PCa and 22 patients (9 women) with diagnosed RCC [4]. All patients were originally imaged as part of institutional review board-approved protocols prospectively evaluating 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02151760, NCT02523924, NCT02687139). All patients signed written informed consent and 18F-DCFPyL was used under the auspices of an FDA Investigational New Drug application (IND 121064).
Imaging procedure
As per our standard practice, patients were asked to be nil per os (with the exception of water and medications) for at least 4 h prior to radiotracer injection. 18F-DCFPyL was synthesized as previously described [13]. Integrated PET/CT using either a Discovery RX 64-slice PET/CT (General Electric, Waukesha, WI, USA) or a Biograph mCT 128-slice PET/CT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) operating in 3D emission mode with CT attenuation correction was performed in all patients. 18F-DCFPyL ≤9 mCi (≤333 MBq) was administered intravenously and after an uptake time of approximately 60 min, acquisitions from the mid-thigh to the vertex of the skull were conducted, covering six to eight bed positions (depending on patient height and the scanner) with patients in the supine position.
Imaging analysis
Imaging data were analyzed using a Syngo.via workstation (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). PET, CT, and hybrid PET/CT imaging overlay could be assessed for viewing in all 98 patients. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians (SPR and RAW) evaluated each PET for abnormal findings in the expected locations of the cervical, stellate, celiac, lumbar, and sacral dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Only those lesions that were visually determined as positive (i.e., those which demonstrated focally, discrete radiotracer retention matched to an area on CT in the expected location of a ganglion) were measured and included in the quantitative analysis. Examples of detected lesions are provided in Figs. 1, 2, 3.
Fig. 1.
a Anterior view of 18F-DCFPyL maximum intensity projection (MIP) image from a 56-year-old PCa patient undergoing preoperative staging. Mild radiotracer uptake is seen in multiple cervical DRG bilaterally (red arrows). b Axial 18F-DCFPyL PET and c axial 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT fusion images from the C5–6 level also show mild radiotracer uptake in the C6 DRG bilaterally (red arrows). Note normal physiologic biodistribution of this radiotracer including uptake in the major salivary glands and structures of the larynx
Fig. 2.
a Sagittal view of 18F-DCFPyL MIP image from a 58-year-old female patient with history of metastatic RCC and undergoing a staging examination. Multiple lumbar and sacral DRG show mild uptake (red arrows). b Axial 18F-DCFPyL PET and c axial 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT through the S1–2 level both demonstrate mild uptake of the S1 DRG (red arrows). Again, a portion of the normal physiologic biodistribution of the radiotracer is apparent including uptake in the patient’s remaining kidney, liver, and bowel
Fig. 3.
a Axial 18F-DCFPyL PET and b axial 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT images from a 66-year-old male patient undergoing staging evaluation for recurrent PCa. Focal mild-moderate radiotracer uptake is noted in the left celiac ganglion (red arrow). A similar degree of uptake was seen in the right celiac ganglion (not shown). c Axial 18F-DCFPyL PET and d axial 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT images from a 67-year-old male with recurrent PCa. Mild uptake is present in the stellate ganglia bilaterally (red arrows)
To derive maximum standardized uptake value corrected to body weight (SUVmax) and maximum standardized uptake value corrected to lean body mass (SULmax), a spherical volume of interest (VOI) was placed over each ganglion on the PET images. While at our institution, we prefer SULmax for clinical 18F-FDG PET reads; our group has previously found that SUVmax is a simpler and equivalent semi-quantitative metric for 18F-DCFPyL PET [6]. Subsequently, the readers ruled out that that no other abnormal 18F-DCFPyL uptake findings could be detected in the volumes. A reference region was defined by drawing a VOI (diameter of 30 mm) involving the ascending aorta (Aortamean) and the right gluteus muscle (Gluteusmean) to derive ganglia-to-aorta as well as ganglia-to-muscle ratios.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Analysis was performed on a patient-, side- (left/right) and ganglia-level basis. To determine the significance of differences between two groups, the independent Student’s t test and paired t test (left vs. right side analysis) were performed. A two-tailed p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (v.22, Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
A total of 76 PCa patients with a mean age of 64 ± 7.2 years (range 47–81 years) and 22 RCC patients with a mean age of 57.8 ± 10.1 (range 34–73 years) were included in our analysis. The majority of the subjects were of white race for both the PCa (n = 65, 85.5%) and the RCC (n = 21, 95.5%) cohort. The clinical indication for imaging included preoperative PCa staging (18/76, 23.7%) and evaluation of recurrent/metastatic disease (58/76, 76.3%). For the RCC patients, similar indications were noted with preoperative staging in 6/22 (27.3%) and recurrent/metastatic disease evaluation in 16/22 (72.7%).
All patients
In 95/98 (96.9%) patients, visually discernible PSMA-targeted ligand uptake in at least one of the above-indicated peripheral ganglia were identified (96.0% of PCa and 100.0% RCC patients). PSMA-ligand uptake above background was found in 70/98 (71.4%) patients in cervical ganglia, 60/98 (61.2%) patients in stellate ganglia, 57/98 (58.2%) patients in celiac ganglia, 75/98 (76.5%) patients in lumbar ganglia, and 8/98 (8.2%) patients in sacral ganglia. The mean SUVmax ± SD were 1.82 ± 0.34, 1.67 ± 0.47, 1.77 ± 0.59, 1.76 ± 0.31, and 1.91 ± 0.45 in the cervical, stellate, celiac, lumbar and sacral ganglia, respectively.
No laterality preference was found in 18F-DCFPyL uptake in cervical, stellate, celiac, lumbar and sacral ganglia when comparing the left and right SUV values, neither for the PCa nor for the RCC cohort (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).
Table 1 summarizes the frequency of 18F-DCFPyL uptake and the involved peripheral ganglia in both the PCa and RCC cohorts. The mean SUVmax, SULmax and the background ratios (Aortamean, Gluteusmean) of the detected ganglia are given in Table 2. The displayed uptake values are generally quite low; however, the low blood pool and background activity of 18F-DCFPyL enable a robust differentiation of ganglia from surrounding tissue [3].
Table 1.
Characteristics of peripheral ganglia identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET in patients with prostate cancer (n = 76) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 22)
| Peripheral ganglia | No. of positive patients | No. of positive patients with bilateral involvement | No. involved ganglia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate cancer | |||
| Cervical | 51/76 (67.1%) | 30/51 (58.8%) | 102 R, 86 L |
| C3 | 16/76 | 11/16 | 14 R, 13 L |
| C4 | 22/76 | 10/22 | 18 R, 14 L |
| C5 | 20/76 | 11/20 | 19 R, 12 L |
| C6 | 29/76 | 14/29 | 23 R, 20 L |
| C7 | 20/76 | 11/20 | 14 R, 17 L |
| C8 | 19/76 | 5/19 | 14 R, 10 L |
| Stellate | 50/76 (65.8%) | 20/50 (40.0%) | 41 R, 29 L |
| Celiac | 45/76 (59.2%) | 30/45 (66.7%) | 39 R, 36 L |
| Lumbar | 55/76 (72.4%) | 44/55 (80.0%) | 111 R, 103 L |
| L2 | 13/76 | 8/13 | 10 R, 11 L |
| L3 | 38/76 | 29/38 | 34 R, 33 L |
| L4 | 46/76 | 30/46 | 40 R, 36 L |
| L5 | 28/76 | 22/28 | 27 R, 23 L |
| Sacral | 5/76 (6.6%) | 2/5 (40.0%) | 4 R, 3 L |
| Renal cell carcinoma | |||
| Cervical | 19/22 (86.4%) | 15/19 (78.9%) | 44 R, 48 L |
| C3 | 12/22 | 9/12 | 10 R, 11 L |
| C4 | 5/22 | 2/5 | 2 R, 5 L |
| C5 | 10/22 | 5/10 | 7 R, 8 L |
| C6 | 9/22 | 4/9 | 6 R, 7 L |
| C7 | 12/22 | 9/12 | 10 R, 11 L |
| C8 | 10/22 | 5/10 | 9 R, 6 L |
| Stellate | 10/22 (45.4%) | 7/10 (70.0%) | 8 R, 9 L |
| Celiac | 12/22 (54.5%) | 1/12 (8.3%) | 5 R, 8 L |
| Lumbar | 20/22 (90.9%) | 17/20 (85.0%) | 43 R, 44 L |
| L2 | 7/22 | 4/7 | 6 R, 5 L |
| L3 | 15/22 | 12/15 | 13 R, 14 L |
| L4 | 17/22 | 11/17 | 13 R, 15 L |
| L5 | 13/22 | 8/13 | 11 R, 10 L |
| Sacral | 3/22 (13.6%) | 1/3 (33.3%) | 1 R, 3 L |
R right, L left
Table 2.
Quantitative analysis of the investigated peripheral ganglia identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET for both cohorts
| Peripheral ganglia | SUVmax | SULmax | SUVmax/Gluteusmean | SULmax/Gluteusmean | SUVmax/Aortamean | SULmax/Aortamean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate cancer | ||||||
| Cervical | 1.82 (0.36) | 1.36 (0.26) | 4.37 (1.30) | 4.16 (1.21) | 1.36 (0.39) | 1.49 (1.00) |
| Stellate | 1.69 (0.49) | 1.28 (0.37) | 4.23 (1.48) | 3.93 (1.31) | 1.30 (0.45) | 1.45 (1.05) |
| Celiac | 1.69 (0.58) | 1.28 (0.46) | 4.29 (2.11) | 4.11 (1.70) | 1.26 (0.57) | 1.43 (1.43) |
| Lumbar | 1.78 (0.31) | 1.34 (0.22) | 4.55 (1.14) | 4.26 (1.34) | 1.35 (0.36) | 1.47 (0.74) |
| Sacral | 1.85 (0.52) | 1.33 (0.30) | 4.20 (1.97) | 3.85 (1.16) | 1.37 (0.39) | 1.37 (0.39) |
| Renal cell carcinoma | ||||||
| Cervical | 1.81 (0.29) | 1.30 (0.22) | 3.73 (1.33) | 3.67 (1.39) | 1.48 (0.91) | 1.60 (1.13) |
| Stellate | 1.56 (0.36) | 1.17 (0.36) | 3.45 (1.90) | 3.35 (2.00) | 1.06 (0.29) | 1.08 (0.30) |
| Celiac | 2.06 (0.55) | 1.44 (0.42) | 4.30 (1.61) | 3.90 (1.84) | 2.18 (2.14) | 2.09 (2.03) |
| Lumbar | 1.71 (0.32) | 1.21 (0.17) | 3.43 (1.13) | 3.43 (1.21) | 1.43 (0.88) | 1.52 (1.05) |
| Sacral | 2.03 (0.38) | 1.42 (0.38) | 4.30 (2.59) | 4.29 (2.63) | 3.73 (2.26) | 3.64 (2.14) |
Mean and standard deviation are given
Uptake in ganglia of PCa patients
With regard to the cervical ganglia, 51/76 (67.1%) PCa patients had uptake in at least one cervical ganglia with similar findings for both sides [left 86 ganglia, right 102 ganglia, with bilateral uptake in at least one ganglion in 30/51 (58.8%) patients]. The most frequent site of radiotracer accumulation was observed at the C6 level with 29/76 (38.2%) patients having positive uptake. Regarding the stellate ganglia, 50/76 (65.8%) were positive [left 29 ganglia, right 41 ganglia, and bilateral 20/50 (40.0%)], whereas for celiac ganglia, 45/76 (59.2%) showed 18F-DCFPyL uptake [left 36 ganglia, right 39 ganglia, and bilateral 30/45 (66.7%)]. Of note, the lumbar ganglia were positive in the majority of the subjects (55/76, 72.4%) with closely analogous findings for both sides [left 103 ganglia, right 111 ganglia, and bilateral 44/55 (80.0%)]. Discernible radiotracer uptake was most commonly observed at the L4 level with 46/76 (60.5%) positive subjects. Regarding sacral ganglia, only 5/76 (6.6%) demonstrated 18F-DCFPyL accumulation [left 3 ganglia, right 4 ganglia, and bilateral 2/5 (40%)].
Uptake in ganglia of RCC patients
Radiotracer uptake was observed in the cervical ganglia in 19/22 patients with RCC [86.4%; left 48 ganglia, right 44 ganglia, and bilateral 15/19 (78.9%)]. Most frequently uptake could be found in the level of C3 and C7 in 12/22 (54.5%), respectively. In the stellate ganglia, 10/22 (45.5%) of the patients demonstrated discernible radiotracer uptake and in the celiac ganglia, 12/22 (54.5%) subjects were positive. Of note, the most frequent site of uptake was in the lumbar ganglia [20/22 (90.9%), left 44 ganglia, right 43 ganglia and bilateral, 17/20 (85%)] with most frequent findings in L4 [17/22 (77.3%)]. Only 3/22 (13.6%) of the RCC patients demonstrated 18F-DCFPyL accumulation in sacral ganglia.
Discussion
The present study describes the uptake patterns in peripheral ganglia, which can act as potential pitfalls when clinically interpreting 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT scans for both PCa and RCC. There was a general trend with a descending frequency of radiotracer accumulation in lumbar, cervical, stellate, celiac, and sacral ganglia. An inexperienced clinical reader could identify uptake in these physiological structures as potential sites of metastatic disease, although many of the peripheral ganglia that have been observed to have uptake are somewhat separated anatomically from typical lymph nodes that become involved with metastatic disease (the most clear exception being the celiac ganglia). Additionally, the cervical, lumbar, and sacral ganglia could potentially be mistaken for bone metastatic disease, particularly if there is slight misregistration between the PET and CT acquisitions or if the uptake is distinctly unilateral.
Generally, the stellate ganglion can also be easily identified on anatomical imaging and this was a common site of uptake in our study (65.8% in PCa) [14]. The ganglia most likely to be misinterpreted as disease-involved lymph nodes are the celiac, as described in a manuscript with extensive pathologic correlation by Krohn and coworkers who were utilizing the PSMA-targeted agent 68Ga-PMSA-HBED [12]. Recently, using the same radiotracer, Kanthan et al. reported similar results, with up to 81% positive uptake findings in the celiac and 74% in the stellate ganglia [15]. In the present study, we evaluated the PSMA-targeted ligand uptake across all peripheral ganglia, both in RCC and PCa patients using 18F-DCFPyL. Compared to the above-mentioned investigations, our number of positive findings was lower in the celiac (59.2%) and stellate ganglia (65.8%). This may be due to a variety of factors including potential improved spatial/contrast resolution of an 18F-labeled radiotracer [16] or perhaps the different underlying chemical structures of the radiotracers which could profoundly impact localization in a primarily hydrophobic environment such as a ganglion [5, 17]. Moreover, the study population of our cohort was almost 10 years younger than the populations in the studies by Krohn [12] and Kanthan [15]. In a study of more than 7400 participants, Steiber and coworkers concluded that the average physical health in an elder population declines age-dependently [18]. Keeping in mind that physical inactivity is an important cause of most chronic diseases as well as playing a role in pain perception [19], our “younger” population included in the current study might have suffered from less biological chronic disease/pain-associated sensation of the celiac ganglia.
Investigating lumbar DRG by 3D magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers, 90% of the DRG showed an intermediate signal intensity, which is in line with the frequency of uptake in our PCa (72.4%) and RCC (90.9%) cohorts [20]. Hence, while interpreting 18F-DCFPyL PET, a clinical reader should keep in mind that physiological uptake in the lumbar region is a frequent phenomenon which could be falsely mistaken as a metastatic site, similar to potential false-positive findings in the celiac ganglia [12]. The same tendency of gradually increasing findings of DRG from L1 to L5 [entire cohort: L2, 20/98 (20.4%) vs. L4, 63/98 (64.3%)], the more frequent occurrence of bilateral ganglia in L4 (entire cohort: 41/63, 65.1%) as well as the fact that the right-left difference in PSMA-uptake reached no significance, could also be observed in the present study [20, 21].
This study has several limitations. First, given its retrospective nature, further confirmatory studies are warranted. Second, no histologic proof of the obtained PET results can be given in light of the benign nature and characteristic locations of ganglia. Moreover, ganglia uptake may be underestimated as partial volume effects have to be considered in small structures less than 15 mm.
Conclusion
Clinical readers should be conscious of potential false-positive findings while interpreting PSMA-targeted PET, and uptake in the lumbar, cervical, stellate and celiac ganglia could be potentially misinterpreted as metastatic lesions. We provide a description of the patterns of 18F-DCFPyL uptake in peripheral ganglia in a large and varied patient cohort. Future research should aim to define the mechanisms underlying the variability of PSMA-targeted radiotracer uptake by peripheral ganglia.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate research funding from NIH CA134675, CA183031, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant agreement.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
MGP is a coinventor on a US Patent covering 18F-DCFPyL, and as such is entitled to a portion of any licensing fees and royalties generated by this technology. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. MAG has served as a consultant to Progenics Pharmaceuticals, the licensee of 18F-DCFPyL. MAG, KJP, MGP, and SPR have received research support from Progenics Pharmaceuticals.
Sources of funding
The Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award, philanthropy raised by the James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, and National Institutes of Health Grants CA134675 and CA183031. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant agreement.
References
- 1.Kiess AP, Banerjee SR, Mease RC, Rowe SP, Rao A, Foss CA, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen as a target for cancer imaging and therapy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;59(3):241–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(4):226–235. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, Plyku D, Nidal R, Eisenberger MA, et al. Initial evaluation of [(18)F]DCFPyL for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17(4):565–574. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Hammers HJ, Som Javadi M, Hawasli H, Szabo Z, et al. Imaging of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma with PSMA-targeted (1)(8)F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29(10):877–882. doi: 10.1007/s12149-015-1017-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dietlein M, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Stockter S, Fischer T, Schomacker K, et al. Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17(4):575–584. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li X, Rowe SP, Leal JP, Gorin MA, Allaf ME, Ross AE, et al. Semiquantitative parameters in PSMA-targeted PET imaging with 18F-DCFPyL: variability in normal-organ uptake. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(6):942–946. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Law WP, Fiumara F, Fong W, Miles KA. Gallium-68 PSMA uptake in adrenal adenoma. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016;60(4):514–517. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kanthan GL, Drummond J, Schembri GP, Izard MA, Hsiao E. Follicular thyroid adenoma showing avid uptake on 68 Ga PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(4):331–332. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rowe SP, Deville C, Paller C, Cho SY, Fishman EK, Pomper MG, et al. Uptake of 18F-DCFPyL in Paget’s disease of bone, an important potential pitfall in clinical interpretation of PSMA PET studies. Tomography. 2015;1(2):81–84. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2015.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barinka C, Rojas C, Slusher B, Pomper M. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II in diagnosis and treatment of neurologic disorders and prostate cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(6):856–870. doi: 10.2174/092986712799034888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mesters JR, Barinka C, Li W, Tsukamoto T, Majer P, Slusher BS, et al. Structure of glutamate carboxypeptidase II, a drug target in neuronal damage and prostate cancer. EMBO J. 2006;25(6):1375–1384. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Krohn T, Verburg FA, Pufe T, Neuhuber W, Vogg A, Heinzel A, et al. [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED uptake mimicking lymph node metastasis in coeliac ganglia: an important pitfall in clinical practice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):210–214. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2915-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ravert HT, Holt DP, Chen Y, Mease RC, Fan H, Pomper MG, et al. An improved synthesis of the radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen inhibitor, [(18)F]DCFPyL. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2016;59(11):439–450. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hogan QH, Erickson SJ. MR imaging of the stellate ganglion: normal appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(3):655–659. doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1739014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kanthan GL, Hsiao E, Vu D, Schembri GP. Uptake in sympathetic ganglia on 68 Ga-PSMA-HBED PET/CT: a potential pitfall in scan interpretation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kesch C, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Kopka K, Giesel FL. 68 Ga or 18F for prostate cancer imaging? J Nucl Med. 2017;58(5):687–688. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eder M, Neels O, Muller M, Bauder-Wust U, Remde Y, Schafer M, et al. Novel preclinical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: a new PET tracer for imaging of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014;7(7):779–796. doi: 10.3390/ph7070779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Steiber N. Population aging at cross-roads: diverging secular trends in average cognitive functioning and physical health in the older population of Germany. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(2):1143–1211. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shen J, Wang HY, Chen JY, Liang BL. Morphologic analysis of normal human lumbar dorsal root ganglion by 3D MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(10):2098–2103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hasegawa T, Mikawa Y, Watanabe R, An HS. Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(9):1005–1009. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]